i don't know how fast it will be in ttp but i hope faster than wto. if so, you are likely to see countries rather using these provisions in the ttp rather than going to the wto. finally, i want to make two other quick points here and then move onto politics. one of the advantage of ttp that got not mentioned until the tail end of the last panel discussion is the advantage of being on the inside of a trade agreement rather than on the outside. the benefits if you will, preferential treatments with ttp. it is going to be in the inside. that's a lot better than on the outside looking in. you know we should not under estimate that. look at the benefits in nafta which is another agreement that people supposedly want to throw out now. look at what we have done to develop north american business enterprises and not u.s. or canada or mexico, but north american business enterprises who have a huge advantage in international competition over tl re the rest of the world because they are on the inside and not on the outside of nafta. my other point here is u.s. l

at the wto, for a whole series has reached a deadlock. that is why two and a half years ago in nairobi it and in december, the wto moved forward with the first case of multilateral trade facilitation agreements. in nairobi, an agreement on export subsidies. also a recognition there was no theer a consensus that mandate should continue as is and that we should be focusing on creative ways of dealing with outstanding issues but also new issues facing the multilateral trading system whether it is e-commerce or small-medium-sized businesses. the http nt tip, we will have free trade for two thirds of the global economy. otheren is also with countries. when you have two thirds of the global economy getting there around a certain set of rules in to open markets and sign up to higher standards, it gives momentum to the multilateral process as well. to see those roles multilateral highest. right now is probably the most open, honest, frank discussion in 15 years,he wto where the ministers into ambassadors in geneva are talking about what is it we

since that round, the wto process just hasn't worked very well. part of that is because there's so many more countries in, you know? it was about a hundred when we did the urugyay round. now you've got to hurd a lot more than that, almost -- herd a lot more than that, almost double, and the negotiators have found that to be very, very difficult. when we finished the uraguay round, just to give you a personal touch to this, i said i thought it might be the last round of trade negotiations ever. and maybe i will turn out to be correct in terms of successful multilateral trade negotiations. i'm sorry about that, but it's been happening since then. our hope with tpp and with ttip or at least the hope of some of us has been that if you could do tpp and then do ttip, you cover a vast amount of world trade. and if you can then fold those agreements into the wto, you could, you know, in a significant way improve the wto and do it without having 180-nation trade negotiation. so i still have some hope for that. but we've got to get tpp right, and we've got

trade representative to bring trade cases against china, both in this country and at the wto. [applause] mr. trump: china's unfair subsidy behavior is prohibited under the terms of its entrance to the wto. i intend to enforce those rules and regulations. basically, i intend to enforce the agreements for all countries, including china. [applause] mr. trump: seven, if china does not stop illegal activities, including the theft of american trade secrets, i will use every lawful -- this is so easy, i love saying this -- i would use every lawful presidential power to remedy trade disputes, including the application of tariffs consistent with section 201 and 301 of the trade act of 1974, and section 232 of the trade expansion act of 1962. when they say trade expansion, they are talking about other countries, not us. there is no expansion. they get the expansion, we get the joblessness. that is the way it works. it is not going to happen anymore. [applause] mr. trump: president reagan deployed similar trade measures when motorcycle and semi conductor imports threatened u.s. industry.

but there are wto agreement provisions on both of these issues. technical barriers trade basically says that product regulations can't be discriminatory. sanitary rules say that food safety measures have to be based on science. so, the tpp has rules on these same things. the first point that i want to make is that because we already have rules at the wto that say something very similar, i'm a little skeptical that the tpp will do much more than has already been done. if there are complaints about another country using food safety measures to restrict trade, which there often are, governments have in the past gone to the wto. i would think they in the future would do the same thing, so i'm not sure that the tpp adds that much. there are, especially in the issue of technical barriers to trade, there are new rules, annexes that cover specific issues in more detail. i will show you one of them. as you can see from the text, it's complicated. there's debate about what this particular provision means related to governments requiring private companies to

but there are wto agreement provisions on both of these issues. technical barriers trade basically says that product regulations can't be discriminatory. sanitary rules say that food safety measures have to be based on science. so, the tpp has rules on these same things. the first point that i want to make is that because we already have rules at the wto that say something very similar, i'm a little skeptical that the tpp will do much more than has already been done. if there are complaints about another country using food safety measures to restrict trade, which there often are, governments have in the past gone to the wto. i would think they in the future would do the same thing, so i'm not sure that the tpp adds that much. there are, especially in the issue of technical barriers to trade, there are new rules, annexes that cover specific issues in more detail. i will show you one of them. as you can see from the text, it's complicated. there's debate about what this particular provision means related to governments requiring private companies to

wto and the world bank cutting their forecast for global growth. rosalind: the g-20 trade ministers said they see global trade falling between 10% to 15% this year. itsworld bank cutting forecast, said the outlook for global gdp is down to 2.4%. says business funding has weakened in advanced economies, ies are struggling with lower prices. also said that downside risks are more pronounced for the year ahead. last week, the wto projected there would be sluggish sales globally in july and august. ministers want to bolster international trade, and they said they are pledging to increase efforts to do so, trying to find an reement to facilitate world trade this year. they say they oppose protectionism and support setting up new investment principles that are open, transparent, and predictable. all of this paving the way ahead of the leaders meeting in september. yvonne: in terms of the g7, g-20, one big issue is steel and the overcapacity issues there, particularly in china, even though they don't say the name really. said the euey have and the u.s. ha

in what we believe is a violation of the bta will -- of wto rules. william: international monetary fund has slashed its growth forecast after britain voted last month to leave the eu. the imf still believe there is a chance for economic downturn. after the brexit, the imf had slashed its outlook for global growth to 3.1 this year and 3.4 for next year. may not sound like much but it is tantamount to hundreds of billions of dollars. it says the uk's will be the worst affected of all advanced economies revising down this year's forecast to 1.5% and shaving almost a full percent off next year's forecast down to 1.3%. despite the low number is, the british government is keeping at school. lundy -- keeping its london says it will not rush into formal exit negotiations. philip hammond faced parliament for the first and since he became british finance minister. he revealed there will be no major fiscal policy decisions until the end of the year statement. it is clear that the referendum decision represents a shock to the u.k. economy, thanks to the actions

and if you can then fold those agreements into the wto, you could in a significant way improve the wto and do it without having 180-nation trade negotiation. so i still have some hope for that. but we've got to get tpp right. and we've got to get tpp approved before we can even think about whether that can be a base for a, you know, maybe a partial wto negotiation that would move a lot of that outcome into the wto. >> so i agree with all of that. what i would add, i like this image of trying to herd 100 cats. one of the things that was available in the uruguay round was you at least had one effective threat. if a country wanted to be recalcitrant, wanted to hold out, you say you won't be a found member of the wto. that was a one-time trick. that's what we found in the doha talks. you do that, now you have 150 some countries in there, maybe 160. and now you got to try to get unanimity. the big split we saw comes back to the big question the u.s. approach versus the chinese approach. do you try for high standards and ambition or try for something less ambitious and less useful. countries

china is not honoring many aspects of the wto. if you look at nafta, there are areas of nafta that are not being honored. in nafta there is a component that is supposed to be reviewed after time. i think it will be a combination of reviewing existing agreements , making sure countries are living up to what they would do and looking at changes that are important for american interests. sees lifet heart he in terms of winning and losing and he sees life in terms of on the other hand in negotiation. steven: i think the first part of it to the winning and losing is, he has to wind become president. he's focused on doing that. , this isof negotiation a man who has negotiated successful agreements through his life and he knows in dealing with other countries throughout the world it is going to be a negotiation. negotiation -- the worst thing you could do is put the other person to walk through like they have been beaten to death. you want people coming out thinking they have been w a winner as well. steven: the trump presidency wants ag

or world bank or the imf or the wto, they are now huge bureaucracies themselves. they are not going to erode themselves. at a time when we are sitting here saying there is no way out of entitlement, how do you reverse the budget for anything? it is not the president. i mean, the president is a conciliator. he is an executive. charlie: when he has all these names in calling hillary clinton "crooked," "lying ted cruz," and all the things that he said -- even what he said about john mccain, does that have a purpose? tom: look, he's a friend, so i can disagree with him. i don't personally like any of it, and the reason i don't like any of it is because he's better than that. he doesn't need to go there. charlie: so, why does he? tom: because he caught onto something, this fissure in the american people that is against the grain that worked. if he would have been presidential -- and he could have, by the way -- the way we would have liked him to do it -- he would still be on "the apprentice." charlie: he can only be where he is if he did what he did? tom: i think so. a

if you look at china, china is not honoring many aspects of the wto. if you look at nafta there are specific areas of nafta that are not being honored. in nafta there is a component that is supposed to be reviewed after a period of time. so i think it's going to be a combination of reviewing the existing agreement, making sure the countries are living up to what they said they would do. and then looking at where there are changes that are important for american interests and american workers. >> rose: that at heart he seeslife life in terms of winning and losing, number one. and he sees life in terms of, on the other hand, a negotiation, is that a fair appraisal? >> that is. and i think the first part of it, the winning and losing is he has to win to become president. he's very focused on doing that. but in terms of negotiation, this is a man who has negotiated very successfully-- successful agreements through his life and he knows in dealing with other countries throughout the world, it is going to be a negotiation. but in terms of-- . >> rose: and a

using these sps provisions in the tpp rather than going through the wto. finally two of the quick points and move on. one advantage of tpp that got no mention until the last panel discussion, the advantage of being on the inside of a trade agreement rather than the outside. the benefits if you will of preferential treatment. with tpp the us is on the inside, a lot better than being on the outside looking in. we should not underestimate things. look at the benefits of nafta, which was another agreement people want to throw out now but look what we have done to develop north american business enterprises. not us or canada or mexico but north american business enterprises who have a huge advantage in international competition over the rest of the world because they are on the inside rather than the outside of nafta. secondly my other point is us leadership. we haven't talked about that a lot today but that is important in the tpp context. only one country can lead what we call the western world and that is the us, tpp is an opportunity for the us to exercise

wtoe failure of naftata and the , chinese ascension into the wto, all of wto, all of those programs, the failure e was not to have nearly strong e enough anand forceful enough labor and environmental side agreements. number two, not to have adjustment mechanisms here in the unitited states for people o lost their jobs s to help them t good jobs that w were new jobs r the jobs they lostst. could havers in t trade compensated the losers and still comeme out ahead, but they did not. that is a a structural, politicl problem in thihis country that e have to address. it is also a problem with regard toto technological displacement. technology is displacing and will continue to disisplace more good jobs in the future, but we haveve no strarategy for d dealg with that. right now, the burdens of technological displacement are falling oncece again on the working middle class, , lower income people who have very few alternatives. driving a greater and greater wedge between those who are lucky enough to have ririch parents or be well educated or be well-connected and everybody else. we cannot go

. >> and now we get this bomb shell on "meet the press" he might leave the wto. >> sure. this is steve moore and larry kudlow on a panel i participated in and at each point where one of the objectionable trade policies arose, tariffs on chinese products or ripping up and a half ta and starting over or leaving a trade deal he's much more flexible we're talking to him he's going to moderate his position. we heard that. i didn't see sunday's announcement as moderation. >> yes. do you understand why he's doing this? because it resonates so well in the rust belts and the swing states? >> i don't think it's just that, simon, though certainly that's at the political core of it. i think leaving the wto is perfectly consistent with donald trump's view on trade and globalization. he has consistently argued that globalization doesn't need to be reshaped, that's more of the clinton view, it needs to be restrained. he's talked about building walls and raising tariffs that both doug and i agree would be reckless economics. so leaving the wto is part and parcel of a kind of nostalgic wo

from the wto and refused to rule out handing immigration from france and germany saying both have been compromised by terrorism. let's take a live look outside. sweltering on this sunday. josh tracking a hotter day tomorrow and also, tells us when kimberly: nothing could stop new hampshire couple from celebrate your big day, not even a summer storm. take a look at this tree that came crashing down on the tent where the newlyweds were having the reception. after pausing to make sure everyone is ok, the party was -- and some people reported hail, the national weather service has said nothing about a twister. kind of scary for you are under a tent. josh: you know there is some severe weather in the area but you just, that's why when we get these warnings you have to take them seriously. it does not have to be our tornado warning to cause serious damage. everybody lucky there. kimberly: welcome back into the a.c. josh: had the sleeves rolled up. tomorrow morning, it will smack everybody in the face but you've got your work clothing on trying to get to work and we are really going to be fee

amy: donald trump has called for getting rid of the wto, the wto. totally challenging the tpp, mixed message from the democrats. are you concerned d about this d do you think donald trump could win? the polls show he is ahead right now. mr. stiglitz: he could win. it is not just the polls. bush did not get a majority of votes, gore got many more votes than bush, but the way our electoral system works is that you can become the president even with a minority of the. , he does notould even have to win a majority of votes. he could win in the electoral college. yes, i'm very worried. one of the things i've been hasing recently is he already done an enormous amount of damage to the united states. amy: the trump campaign chief said today that mr. trump has said his taxes are under audit and he will not be releasing them. why dodoes that matter?? mr. stiglitz: it matters because there is a good reason why we suspect that he has not been honest about where his wealth is or what his charitable contributions are or that he has paid a fair share of his taxes.

e will see you again wto okay, ready? whoa! [ explosion ] nothing should get in the way of the things you love. ♪ >>> on this saturday night, deadly coup attempt. nearly 200 killed. thousands arrested in turkey after members of the military try to seize power. tonight the u.s. with urgent calls for calm inside this critical ally. >>> the ticket. donald trump officially introducing indiana governor mike pence as his vice president pick. will joining forces unite a divided party? >>> was he radicalized? new details tonight about the truck driver who committed mass murder in france as his father speaks out for the first time about his son's troubled past. >>> and an officer's best friend. dogs once abandoned in shelters given a second chance to help police in the

or world bank or imf or the wto, there are now -- they are now huge bureaucracies themselves. they are not going to erode themselves. at a time when we are sitting here saying there is no way out of entitlement, how do you reverse the budget for anything? the president is a conciliator. he is an executive. charlie: when he has all these names in calling hillary clinton ted cruz,""lying even what he said about john mccain, does that have a purpose? tom: look, he's a friend, so i can disagree with him. i don't personally like any of it, and the reason i don't like any other is because he's better than that. he doesn't need to go there. charlie: so, why does he? tom: because he caught onto something, this fisher in the american -- fissure in the american people that is against the grain but cworked. if he would have been presidential -- and he could have, by the way -- the way we would have liked him to do it -- charlie: he can only be where he is if he did what he did? tom: i think so. how can you say hillary clinton is not capable? imeleyan, yale, two-t senator, wife of the pre

if you look at china, china is not honoring many aspects of the wto. if you look at nafta, there are specific areas of nafta that are not being honored. in nafta, there is a component that it was supposed to be reviewed after a period of time. i think it's going to be a combination of reviewing existing agreements, making sure the countries are living up to what they said they would do, and looking at where there are changes, they are important -- where there are changes that are important to american interests and workers. charlie: at heart, he sees life in terms of winning and losing. he sees life, on the other hand, as a negotiation. is that a fair appraisal? steven: that is. i think the first part, the winning and losing is. he has to win to become president. this is a man that has negotiated very successful agreements in his life. he knows that dealing with other countries around the world will be a negotiation. charlie: in a good negotiation, everybody knows the worst thing you could do is for the other person to walk away feeling like they have

the officials say if negotiations fail, they'll ask the wto to set up a panel to set up the dispute. >>> discarded automobiles generate large amounts of waste. it's a problem worldwide. it's one that businesses in japan are working to solve. and a new program is helping to share advanced japanese technology with the places that need it most. >> reporter: these cars have reached the end of the road but their components will be reborn in new products. this plant uses highly detailed methods. a group of researchers from brazil came to see how it works. they were invited by the japanese international cooperation agency. the group included engineers and set up a progrgram back home. professor daniele castro helped organize the visit. >>. >> we have now this process for cars. we have a lot of use of cars that needs to be recycled. >> reporter: when cars reach the end of their useful life, most are dumped. castro says they often leak oil and lead contaminating soil and ground water. he and his team want to use what they learn in japan to turn things around. they're hoping their trainees wil

you have the marshal plan, you have the wto, you have the imf. >> rose: right. >> nobody knows what any of these entities do, and why are we paying for them. it is all foreign policy, it is all foreign policy related and our foreign policy doesn't work. so i think what he is doing, in a smart way, is saying, look, i am throwing a little bit of fire and i know into the frying pan, and people are going to be concerned. but them being concerned is a good thing. >> rose: so you are actually saying that while you think he understands the issues he also understands the value of inflammatory rhetoric? >> yes. absolutely. >> rose: so when he has all of these names and calling hillary clinton crooked, calling ted cruz lying ted cruz, and all of the things that he said, and even when, what he said about john mccain, does that have a purpose? >> look, he is a friend so i can disagree with him. i don't personally like any of it, and the reason i don't like any of it is he is better than that. he doesn't need to go there. >> rose: joining me now is roger stone, he is a republican strategist and a lo

you have new tariffs, worldwide under wto rule. it is expense. not a single process. you probably jump. manus: the whole leave campaign was predicated on immigration. and was predicated on controlling immigration. and if you go in under what is the norway option, you have no control over the free movement of people, under that style with which already exist. stephen: the norway view, though attractive, is going to be longer-term. there are two possibilities. one one of course, and this is a long shot, starting to revise the freedom of movement, that we can't rely on that. break, we, over the ourselves might change our mind. we can rely on that either. most likely thing is that we find ourselves over quite a long period of time, and maybe having gone out under wto negotiating some kind of free-trade deal on the canada model or something similar. anna: just briefly, the most important visit the new prime minister will have to make is to germany perhaps. we have this trade flow graphic in terms of trade. stephen: germany, paris and berlin are the obvious places, but of c

. +++ actions at the wto. we have a lot of pending action. some actions already coming from the u.s. it would not be that much of a divergence. he says he is going to instruct the u.s. trade representative office to find every trade violation that is currently happening from other countries and he will bring actions to the wto. experts say there is no such list. it is hard to figure out what the violations are. case is good evidence that is brought to the deputy oh do not have that much of an effect on trade. it's not like you can go and bring a court case and when it in world trade organization -- win it.en it shery: you can have no trade and perfect sovereignty, all on north korea. explain this to us. brendan: there was a bit of north korea, u.k. in his speech. he has the same challenge that the brexiteers have. he says i want trade with protection without a loss of sovereignty. that's the same thing they are saying in the u.k.. europe, it is the european court of justice that defines what free-trade is. you can compare apples to apples and

strongest economies, many competitive advantages would more than compensate for any tears which the wto will ensure cannot be punitive even if they were imposed while nations around the world are already including australia, including new zealand are already knocking at our door with regard to trade deals? >> no one is more impressed by the strength of the british economy than me. i think it is strong. it's got many advantages, many key industries that are admired the world over. and we have to recognize its going to be hard and difficult negotiations in many ways because we are negotiating with a block of 440 million people. but sort of we should make the most of our strength. i think this idea that terrorists can be compensated for in other ways is quite dangerous talk to if you think about the car company and others who invested a want to come and invest year and then pay tariffs. i think they are all on the whole to be avoided. >> this campaign undoubtedly made -- [inaudible] the evolving exposed accordingly. but coming back to the issue which has been raised a number of occasions t

walmart has been blamed for helping -- the wto, nafta and other things in china they have done. famous for really pushing companies to lower costs. pennyating over a p and that is what pushed companies to go overseas and move production to china to meet the demands of walmart. the irony here is walmart has been blamed for sending hundreds of thousands of jobs outside the , really here they are the only retailer making a major push to try to bring made in the usa products back. carol: roughly three years ago that they set out on this mission. is it working? \ shannon: there is a group that walmart has worked with that is supportive. they tallied up the number of jobs that have been created based on public announcements the company has made. we are at about 7000 jobs. carol: is it too early to tell? maybe it does take a while. can they actually make a difference and create a lot of jobs by doing this mission? shannon: if walmart spends $250 billion they will be able to create 250,000 jobs in the manufacturing sector. when you count all the indirect jobs like, someone has a job so

kennedy: i was in seattle for the wto protests. they were bane large center entertaining. but then the protests turned violent and police turned on the protesters and it got out of hand with the anarchists. but there is a lot more than anarchists for law enforcement to worry about. as we saw in dallas you have lone wolves who may use facebook live to do that. we have people with political agendas in this country. you could argue on both sides and i almost think as david brown, the police chief in dallas said, we are asking law enforcement to do too much, and maybe we are doing that in cleveland. >> they will have a lot on their hands. >> we have a lot on our hands. mark ruffalo comes up with a solution to police relations. donald trump met with indiana governor mike pence and former house speaker newt gingrich today. when you booked this trip, you didn't know we had hundreds of thousands of places to stay all over the world. or that we searched billions of flights to get you here. a few weeks ago, you didn't even know where here was. now the only thing you don't know, is h

the wto and the world federation of trade unions will also attend ahead of this weekend. an annual meeting with leading economic groups. they did gather in china for the g-20 meeting this week and global finance ministers saying discussions likely to include the impact of brexit. >> there has been significant in the macroeconomic section of great britain over the last five years. we have seen it move from a 10% fiscal deficit to more than half. my recommendation would be to really reduce the level of uncertainty, identify clearly what the goals are, identify the that it, and understand will take time but it will require understanding on both sides in order to eliminate the trade uncertainty, the uncertainty, the passport uncertainty, and a whole range of issues which need to be addressed which have brought the european countries together and from which clearly the united kingdom as indicated in its intention to withdraw. >> are you pleased with what you have seen out of the european leaders so far? g 20o in a few days to the meetings. we are focused on the united kingdom.

manus: surely that is where people would say, use the wto menu. talk to me about theresa may. very interesting, these nuances in terms of how we think the negotiation of start and go in terms of theresa may's ambition to have access to the eu, but to reduce immigration. square the circle. rob: well you can't. there is a fundamental trade-off. full membership of the single market requires free movement of workers. if you restrict free movement, it jeopardizes full access to the single market. that is the choice the u.k. faces. outside the single market, you can have free trade agreement, but the single market goes a lot further than that, which is why it is so important. manus: is that when the reality check comes, when people realized access to the eu is not something that you get unless you've got immigration? rob: when does the reality hit? manus: if that is the scenario. rob: it feels like a lot of decisions have been pushed out with article 50 maybe not being triggered until the new year. ande that gives relief comes back when it becomes clear that single market access is

blamed for been helping -- there is wto and nafta and everything they have done. walmart was really famous in the 1990's and early 2000's for pushing companies to lower costs, negotiating ruthlessly over a penny and that drive for lower costs is what needs to go overseas and move production to china to meet the demands of walmart. walmart has been blamed for sending hundreds of thousands of jobs outside the u.s. and here they are, the only retailer making a major push to bring made in the usa products back. carol: roughly 2 1/2 years ago they set out on this mission. is it working? >> there's a group that was supportive of what walmart is doing. but they tallied up the number of jobs that have been created aced son public announcement companies have made. we are at about 7000 jobs. carol: is it too early to tell? can they actually make a difference and create a lot of jobs by doing this in the u.s.? >> if walmart spends $250 billion they will be able to create 250,000 jobs in the manufacturing sector. when you count all the indirect jobs, someone is getting there

walmart has been blamed for helping -- there is wto and nafta and everything they have done. walmart was really famous in the 1990's and early 2000's for pushing companies to lower costs, negotiating ruthlessly over a penny and that drive for lower costs is what needs to go overseas and move production to china to meet the demands of walmart. walmart has been blamed for sending hundreds of thousands of jobs outside the u.s. and here they are, the only retailer making a major push to bring made in the usa products back. carol: roughly 2 1/2 years ago they set out on this mission. is it working? >> there's a group that was supportive of what walmart is doing. but they tallied up the number of jobs that have been created based on public announcement companies have made. we are at about 7000 jobs. carol: is it too early to tell? can they actually make a difference and create a lot of jobs by doing this in the u.s.? >> if walmart spends $250 billion they will be able to create 250,000 jobs in the manufacturing sector. when you count all the indirect jobs, someone is getting there

countries outside the eu have access to the single market, some through a trade deal, some through wto rules. is tosly, the best access be a member of the single market, and what the country will have to decide and the next prime minister will have to decide is what access do we want, what are the costs and benefits of having that access, and i ensure we will talk on that when i give my statement. on the european council. mr. speaker: neil gray? gray: the prime minister is uck in myt terex tr constituency is consulting with staff in unions. will you commit to meet with me to discuss this perilous situation for the company that has worked for us and what support his government can provide? prime minister cameron: first of all, i am aware about the announcement of further job losses, and this will obviously be a difficult time for the workers and their families. i understand the scottish and u.k. government have been working with them as part of a partnership action for continuing and employment scheme. scotland is also keeping a close eye on the situation, and i am happy to meet with th

kennedy: i was in seattle for the wto protests. they were bane large center entertaining. but then the protests turned violent and police turned on the protesters and it got out of hand with the anarchists. but there is a lot more than anarchists for law enforcement to worry about. as we saw in dallas you have lone wolves who may use facebook live to do that. we have people with political agendas in this country. you could argue on both sides and i almost think as david brown, the police chief in dallas said, we are asking law enforcement to do too much, and maybe we are doing that in cleveland. >> they will have a lot on their hands. >> we have a lot on our hands. mark ruffalo comes up with a solution to police relations. donald trump met with indiana governor mike pence and former house speaker newt gingrich today. ♪ [announcer] is it a force of nature? or a sales event? the summer of audi sales event is here. get up to a $5,000 bonus on select audi models. by switching to xfinity x1. rio olympic games show me gymnastics. x1 lets you search by sport, watch nbc's highli

vonnie: wto's, nato. >> the council of europe, eurozone, economic area, and even today, is not in the heart of europe. area whichnot in the allows border-free travel between member countries. for britain to move from this spot in the venn diagram to maybe this spot, it is not as if texas were to secede from the u.s. vonnie: there have been all sorts of agreements in place even before there was free movement of labor. there had been agreements with other countries, but will it be easy to resurrect those agreements, or put in place new agreements, now that they have rejected the european union ideal? >> there will be some real cost to this, which is why you will have the morris campaign may be unduly the whole thing. theresa may, for example, is saying no, the people have spoken. we have to go ahead with this. there will be consequences. but i try to make the point that it is not an all or nothing situation. it is a good thing that europe has differential integration, to wantxact amount you vonnie:. what doesn't mean for central bankers, reacting or being proactive? will react, and we h

carol: he talked about china and the wto. he thinks there should be penalties, right, when people do not abide by the rules. ellen: and he -- whether that will work is questionable because i have been some studies that show even after there is litigation in these trade organizations they are often -- it is not more advantageous for the country that is suing. carol: let's talk about the opening remarks and bernie sanders. because he can't seem to walk away. ellen: he can't. and we call it bern out. ] iggling we thought we were clever. we basically talk about why bernie sanders cannot bring himself to admit defeat and embrace the democratic party and hillary clinton. and what josh green, our author says is that this is the way he has always operated. carol: you mentioned joshua green. josh: the thing that puzzled so many democrats and alarm liberals is that he has not embraced her the way the runner-up usually does when you get to this point in a race. not only has he declined to endorse her, he is out there often attacking her

carol: he talked about china and the wto. he thinks there should be penalties when people do not abide by the rules. ellen: and he -- whether that will work is questionable because i have been some studies that show even after there is litigation in these trade organizations they are often -- it is not more advantageous for the one that is suing. carol: let's talk about the opening remarks and bernie sanders. he can't seem to walk away. ellen: he can't. we call it bern out. we thought we were clever. we basically talk about why bernie sanders cannot bring himself to admit defeat and embrace the democratic party and hillary clinton. and what josh green, our author says is that this is the way he has always operated. carol: you mentioned joshua green. josh: the thing that puzzled so many democrats and alarm liberals is that he has not embraced her the way the runner-up usually does when you get to this point in a race. not only has he declined to endorse her, he is out there often attacking her and sending mixed signals that su

i was in the middle of wto riots in 1989 and we have seen tactics begin to change as police officers determined that one of the ways to control a crowd is to divide and conquer. we have seen that happen the last few years. i think the important point to make here today is what's causing these flare-ups and riots and protests in the first place. that's where we need to direct our attention. charles: what's causing them? a lot of times they feel spontaneous, but with the advent of social media i'm sure there is some planning as well. >> i think that's one of the problems. we live in this high-tech age and communication is so easily disseminated to thousands of people in an instant that you can gather up large groups immediately and all of a sudden the police are confronted with a large angry crowd. part of the problem here is while i think the main issue is, there is no longer trust that exists between the police and community. in some smaller community you might find that trust. but as we go across the country and watch these protests. that trust has begun to deteriorate and disappear

rea and have relations on the european union on wto rules? this is what theresa may will have to decide with her team. vonnie: we will have to wait and see. and i guess it will be up to the new ministry to figure that out. john, the first question will be who will be the chancellor? john: and we will discover the answers quite soon. -- has been seen someone who doesn't have a massive finance responsibility previously, i know that george osborne would like to say on if he gets a big job. i think the foreign secretary would also be saying. i think theresa may has said publicly that you want to bring in more women than david cameron has. thate: and she has said you wants to deliver serious social reform and make an economy that works for everyone. it sounds like she means fiscally as well as socially. john: as the secretary she was in charge of the justice system. she has already shown some signs -- and this is the thing that drove margaret thatcher slightly, she has started talking about bringing workers onto the boards. those are slightly germ

we are out of the wto, others will exit. or even worse, they will stay in and we will be excluded. not a good phenomenon. >> what sorts of things are you looking for in the siding who you would like to be president? >> i want somebody reasonable and logical who is kind of in the middle like i feel 70% of the american population is, and just says, can we all get along and just do something to advance arguingtry rather than ideologically and come rushing absolutely nothing at a time when the world is changing with the growth of china, population growing from 7 billion until 10 billion, and the digital age and the digital centric and i would like somebody who focuses on that and says, how do we get things done >>make the country better? coming up in the next 20 minutes of bloomberg market, the democratic national convention this week, already going off script as the fbi launched an investigation into the hack of the dnc e-mails that may be linked to the russian government. vonnie: after announcing sales to horizon, marissa mayer's discusses. >> let's take a look at where the u.s. majo

he had a map that he looked at planning the march exactly where they were going to g he wto go, see the crops produced in all of these counties, how many hogs, how much corn, wheat, et cetera. ise going he's going to try to through the bread basket because he's living off the land. he told grant don't try it, it won't work and then it did and sherman went, wow, it worked and tested it at meridian, in february of 64 and saw that it would work, so when it became time to march across georgia, he implemented it on a much grander scale. when they get past millageville, you're starting to move into an area of georgia that is what we call the pine barrens. food is scarce so they've got to keep moving. you're wearing out shoes, you're wearing out the uniforms. one of the first things they requested when they got to the coast was shoes. so, part of it, too, was to just keep moving in as much of a straight line as possible. that would be the best explanation that i could give in terms of why they skipped augusta. march to the sea, not to augu a augusta, that's right. towards the city. and there w

and others that showed how in china, they joined the wto in 2001. there are a certain very specific set of communities in the country. they were really devastated by that. people like you were saying, when you do have retraining programs, help for these people. but it didn't, we did not really deliver. charlie: we did not retrain, we did not do a range of things. there was no commitment in washington. gridlock. tom friedman: so what happens, basically, there is a giant acceleration around 2007, and then 2008 came along, we were looking the other way. got the great recession, washington went into total gridlock. so the conveyor belt suddenly sped up. in that disjunction, you have a lot of trouble. charlie: as technology has moved forward on them, taken from you, politics, technology has moved forward in the age of acceleration. government has not been able to keep up. we are in this place where this is going here, and government, for all kinds of reasons, whether it is gridlock, new dilemmas, and problem-solving necessary, has not addressed some of t

and others that showed how in china, they joined the wto in 2001. they are a certain very specific set of communities in the country. they were really devastated by that. saying,ike you were when you do have retraining programs, help for these people. but it didn't, we did not really deliver. charlie: we did not retrain, we did not do a range of things. there was no commitment in washington. gridlock. tom friedman: so what happens, basically, there is a giant acceleration around 2007, and then 2008 came along, we were looking the other way. got the great recession. washington went into total deadlock. so the conveyor belt suddenly spread up. -- sped up. in that disjunction, you have a lot of trouble. charlie: as technology has moved forward on them, taken from you, politics, technology has moved forward in the age of acceleration. government has not been able to keep up. we are in this place where this is going here, and government, for all kinds of reasons, whether it is gridlock, new dilemmas and problem-solving necessary, has not addressed some o