hillary clinton is dirty. when the fbi writes in exoneration before the investigation and jury, that is wrong, and don't you come out and tell me that everybody does it, nobody does that. you do an investigation and then you make a decision. >> he's got to fire mueller. he's got to shut this down. i say to the american people right now as a formal federal agent, you are getting worked. you are being played for fools. if any more of this comes out, he's got to shut that down, they have to clean house at the top of the fbi. there is no other way. >> sean: who's going to fire him? >> he can't fire him. that's the problem. you've got to have -- sessions has got to exercise some control and appoint special counsel himself. rod rosenstein is running everything from the department of justice. >> sean: this is a goodhi question, where is the attorney general of this country? where is he? >> thank you. that's the problem. rosenstein -- sessions has backed off because rosenstein has told him that he's got to. >> he's go

>> yes. >> sean:n: hillary clinton? >> oh, yeah. i think she has been worried about this for a long time. >> sean: cheryl mills? >> absolutely. >> sean: huma? >> absolutely. >> sean: anyone else can you think of? >> peter strzok, lisa page. they are already in trouble. >> sean: do you agree with that? >> yes.? i think there is a likelihood that clinton investigation gets reopened and the mueller investigationmi is derailed basd on having a special agent involved. the number two deputy being a hillary clinton activist, going to her election night party, sending an email to sally yates, praising her anti-trump actions as obamama holdover. >> sean: all good information. >> just as you know sean, we looked at the prosecutors a mueller hired. we couldn't find anyone who was a registered republican. we did find 10 registered democrats. r no registered republicans onno mueller's team. >> sean: exit question, yes or no question. bigger than watergate? >> in so many different ways it is. >> sean: sara? >> it's more pervasive. >> sean: sara?

for sending anti-trump, flo hillary clinton text messages. fox news tonight has learned that strzok's role in the clinton email investigation is now under review. i will address that. and strzok is directly tied to everything. the clinton email probe, the so-called russia investigation. we have an investigative reporter sarah carter reporting that strzok even interviewed lieutenant general michael flynn and hillary clinton in both cases and fox news has confirmed that the former fbi official changed the language, he did it, in james comey's draft letter about hillary clinton from grossly negligent to "extreme callousness." plus, the deputy fbi director andrew mccabe. he has been identified tonight as the key witness that congress wants to interview in regards to the anti-trump face news dossier and propaganda. and media insanity. abc news suspends reporter brian ross after he is caught red-handed spreading more fake news and outright lies about general flynn and the president. we also have very serious questions tonight about the rule of law.

but hillary clinton, not so much. you also got to remember, one of the little-known facts there is the department of justice, via the fbi, was handing out immunity like candy. in those immunity agreements, they were not required to cooperate with government officials. you can track that was general flynn, who had to plead guilty and has to cooperate. here you are giving out immunity. these witnesses had no obligation to work with government officials and investigators and there are still, sean, to this day, tens of thousands of documents, hillary clinton emails, that have not been shared with congress. they are still sitting at the department of state. >> sean: unbelievable. wouldn't you have to redo this investigation, knowing what we know now, about how the fix was in? >> absolutely. the entire campaign, over andwa over, was lying. there was collusion, coordination betweenor the campaign, the state department, focus on the hill, as i have said over and o over again. a very coordinated effort, strategically, by those

hillary clinton -- she has every advantage possible. all of the kings horses and kings men, so much more money and so much more personnel. she has all of the mainstream media. she has all of the democrats behind her. the two presidents and her husband and her predecessor. his record did not get a third term to her presidency. all of these advantages, and then after she loses she still has advantages. she still has people going for her. donald trump won the issues, he won. he was a better communicator. his ideas prevailed, hers failed. and this idea on his health is offensive. i will not even dignify except to say, remember when hillary clinton folded like an accordion in front of the whole world on 9/11? we said nothing about it the whole day at the campaign. zero. she folded in front of everyone. apparently she had had pneumonia two days earlier. you know what she did that night? she was at a restaurant with her high class donors. and then she takes five days off before the debate, donald trump's doing seven rallies a day and beating h

you want to whip up on hillary clinton. hillary clinton is not the issue here. the issue is trump and potential collusion. >> kimberly: the juxtaposition between the two. >> jesse: i will tell you the difference. hillary clinton put national security at risk. hillary clinton repeatedly didn't tell the truth. she destroyed her emails after they were subpoenaed. she smashed blackberries with hammers. when she went in for the fbi interview, she never was put under oath. general flynn never put national security at risk, never did it and never destroyed the evidence. yet he was put under oath without a lawyer and he has now lost everything. >> juan: there's no evidence -- you say that. nothing revealed. >> brian: because she bleached her emails. >> juan: nobody says she was hacked or any foreign government gained information. >> katie: just because there is a double standard does not mean michael flynn is lying to the fbi, which even president trump admits he did. however there is a double standard, and in america, people have serious questions about our federal ins

they are defending hillary clinton in court, sean. it is worse than you even know in the sense that -- >> sean: i don't get jeff sessions. my patience is friday at this point. i don't know what's going on over there but if we believe in our constitution, we believe in equal justice under the -- they have got to step up here. and i don't know what it's going to take. sarah carter, let me go to you. this is blockbuster. we are talking about the fourth amendment. illegal search and seizure. you have talked to long serving nsa legal officials and others about the fbi's use of this nsa surveillance program? and that in fact, it's being misused specifically explain. >> specifically what they do is they have, you know, the nsa has a surveillance program that's meant to capture everything on foreigners. but what they have done is used it as a back door. the fbi uses that as a back door to do warrantless searches on americans. this is a huge problem. i mean, they have admitted to it we know that comey testified about this just before he was fi

hillary clinton -- she has every advantage possible. all of the kings horses and kings men, so much more money and so much more personnel. she has all of the mainstream media. she has all of the democrats behind her. the two presidents and her husband and her predecessor. his record did not get a third term to her presidency. all of these advantages, and then after she loses is she still has advantages. donald trump on the issues, he won. he was a better communicator. his ideas prevailed, hers failed. and this idea on his health is offensive. i will not even dignify except to say, remember when hillary clinton folded like an accordion in front of the whole world on 9/11? we said nothing about it the whole day at the campaign. a zero. she pulled in front of everyone. apparently she had had pneumonia two days earlier. you know what she did that night? she was at -- with her high class donors. and then she takes five days off before the debate, donald trump's doings doing seven rallies a day and beating her. and she is taking time off of t

they took a shot at hillary clinton in the video. it was a parody giving funny reasons why hillary clinton should not run again the new year. they got a lot of backlash from their readers would call the video sexist. you will hear the apology and why president trump's calling "vanity fair" out for all of this when we come back. from the very beginning ... it was always our singular focus, a distinct determination. to do whatever it takes, use every possible resource. to fight cancer. and never lose sight of the patients we're fighting for. our cancer treatment specialists share the same vision. experts from all over the world, working closely together to deliver truly personalized cancer care. specialists focused on treating cancer. using advanced technologies. and more precise treatments than before. working as hard as we can- doing all that we can- for everyone who walks through our doors. this is cancer treatment centers of america. and these are the specialists we're proud to call our own. treating cancer isn't one thing we do. i

clinton e-mail investigation, there was partisan support for hillary clinton, comey mccabe and others watered down the entire investigation to help hillary clinton. that's what the republicans are alleging. >> it's interesting, if you look at whole admittedly unusual steps that jim comey took, first announcing investigation, then saying it's over, then right before the election saying it's back, at any given point of time clinton people were outraged, then the republicans, then the clinton people. what jim comey did was unusual and we'll be debating for years about whether making the public announcements was right thing to do. and by the way when history weighs in, as member of the intelligence committee, not all the facts are known. facts that impacted his thinking. when history judges this, i think will be regarded as quandary he was put in but not a shred of evidence he was acting in partisan manner. evidenced by angering both campaigns. >> do you fear or think the president might try to fire andrew mccabe by putting pressure on rod rosenstein or christopher ray? >> i really do. we

a close aide to hillary clinton weighs in life. plus, a republican lawmaker calls for a purge at the fbi. now seems to be backtracking. we will get live reaction from congressman matt gates. and melania trumps christmas tweet gets trolled. why are democrats constantly ripping into her? and he literally wrote the book on first ladies. he will give us the inside scoop. ♪ >> ed: good evening and welcome again to fox news at night. i'm ed henry in washington in for shannon bream all week. new tonight in an unfolding controversy involving president barack obama and president donald trump, the longtime obama advisor says tonight the former president did indeed take a shot at president trump during an interview with britain's prince prince harry. despite not naming the current president directly in the sit down. what's more, he's accusing the current commander-in-chief of using social media to "divide the american community, part of a plague on the entire conversation on the internet." the attacks mirror those from his former boss, bara

many of them went to hillary clinton. those dues went to hillary clinton who actually they ended up buying off russian informants in an acquire-style dossier. and they were actually voting for donald trump. >> it's exactly what they say they don't like about trump that they can't prove for a year. last thing, what do we do? i don't even know what to do about roberts mueller, congressman gates, last word. >> sean, what i would say is first thing we need to do is get rid of this mueller investigation. the attorney general jeff sessions sees the same things we see. i don't know why jeff sessions has not fired bob mueller yet as a consequence of terrible investigation. second thing we need to do is set up procedures at the fbi where there is more oversight and transparency so this never happens again. so we never gate rogue director like jonbenet ramsey. >> is this the worst you have ever seen it? >> it is unquestionably. time now for jeff sessions to do his job. if he doesn't do his job you, step aside and let somebody else

one person who has been silent as hillary clinton. she initially defended to franken when the first accusations against him surface surfaced. he apologized. so hillary clinton, where arefe you now. dooc you agree with the fellow democrats? do you think you should step down? we reached out to clinton spokesman for a comment. shockingly, we have not heard back. l i guess they lost our number. joining me now with reaction, former clinton pollster, doug schon, monica crowley, andrew becker rose woodland. i'm making the case here, 30 years or defending the clintons, defending that predator bill clinton, and her money that she took from all of these countries that abused women, killed gays and lesbians, this is political expediency. all of this, the flood, it was clearly orchestrated by the democrats. there is a political strategy behind it. i do agree with that? >> i think the strategy is we cannot support men who are sexual abusers. a sexual assault is not acceptable.>> >> sean: wrong answer. i think -- they turn on him because they have

. >> did james coming back water down his infamous statement to protect hillary clinton? bombshell evidence

but you give hillary clinton a pass. flynn either had a bad lawyer or he thought there was something wrong with that russian phone call. it was not illegal or improper. lou: it sounds like there was a breakdown between the legal team and between the general and the president. >> it sounds like he's in pardon territory and it sounds like mueller has to be removed. put in a new prosecutor to better manage the situation. >> the collusion case looks like that attractive girlfriends who lives in canada town never meet her. lou: i think the president now has a major legislative victory. this is moving ahead. the president is stronger, i think, by orders of magnitude than was a week ago. this meeting between the house and senate, just shore up the differences in the bill. thursday senators schumer and pelosi did not show up the first time. they said yes they will be there thursday, so you can't claim only one party is working on it. mark: they are struggling to couple with a tax plan. the companies that buy back the stock, that

probe of hillary clinton's private e-mail server. he basically congratulated lisa page after clinton clenched the democratic party nomination saying this "congrats that a woman nominate nominated for president in a major party" and he wrote that within days of the fbi then director james comey clearing hillary of criminal wrongdoing right? >> well don't get me started on comey. >> liz: what about the text messages? >> people are entitled to have an opinion but it strikes me that if you're involved in the lead investigator in this and helping you make decisions about who gets put under oath and what order you take-- >> liz: and what is the charge from gross negligence to extrem- >> you ought to be very careful. those people ought to be very careful about demonstrating any bias even in private conversation. my experience with the fbi agents has been that they've been very restrained if you will about their personal views . this guy was not which he should have been involved in the hillary clinton investigation and when it was found out

clinton's campaign, so weisman or strzok or mccabe, they gave money to hillary clinton's campaign. should they be working on this investigation about donald trump i mean the same people who worked on the investigation of hillary clinton were clearly against donald trump and they said so in their texts. >> right. in par she all it is probably a myth, i think judges all have opinions prosecutors all have opinions and these conflicts of. maria: but they don't have to give money. >> right and i feel stronger about some issues than i do others and it's up to me at the starting point to go to my superior and say this isn't the right investigation for me. that agent should be out investigating atm thefts in kansas the rest of his career but there's larger problems here about the management and decisions that were made and again it's breath taking to think it could go this far with these partisans and their reliance on the manufactured evidence that hillary clinton campaign and others paid for. maria: well that's a good point because do we know if the fbi actually paid? the fbi will not an

i've got to go. >> did a hillary clinton lie under oath? they indicted roger clemens for lying under oath and they didn't even touch her with clinton. >> martha: thank you, thank you very much. good to see you tonight. it is a case that led to the burning of a major american city. officers accused of wrongdoing in the death of freddie gray. now in the clear and back on the job. so what does it tell us about the way the story unfolded, and all that was lost along the way? the prosecutor's handling of this case, we will speak with one of the dads of one of the officers because the officers are not allowed to speak out yet. but we have an exclusive with his father. plus, former president obama has a way to end sexual harassment, perhaps, in washington. he said we should elect more women. brian kilmeade and jessica tarlov will be here to take that on when we come back. ♪ today we're out here to test people's knowledge about type 2 diabetes. so you have type 2 diabetes? yes i do. true or false... type 2 diabetes more than doubles your chance o

jillian: fox news exclusive revealing brand-new review into hillary clinton's e-mail investigation as president trump takes aim at the fbi. rob: and the season for holiday grinches. the store that banned the salvation army bell ringers, "fox & friends first" continues right now? ♪ ♪ jillian: yes, the quiet dark start to monday morning but it's time to wake up. good morning u you're watching "fox & friends first", i'm jillian mele. rob: president trump unleashing on the fbi and demanding answers. this after fox news exclusive reveals a tainted top agent sent antitrump text messages, griff jenkins live innation's -- at our nation's capital. >> good morning, rob, quite a tweet storm by president's standards, but mainly the tweet criticizing the fbi this one after years of comey with the phoney and dishonest clinton investigation and more running the fbi, its reputation is in tatters, worst in history but fear not, we will bring it back to greatness, that drew strong reaction to former attorneys eric holder and sallyuates, -- sally yates. the dedicated men and women to have fbi deserv

always see special exceptions for hillary clinton. the clinton campaign don't exist anymore, which why they're not taking millions of dollars. but it's very disturbing to folks and who knows if there's more -- i'm glad they took action and got rid of this guy because a lot of damage has aalready been done. we're also seeing now more information being released about that famous tarmac meeting that wasn't just about golf and grandchildren we would imagine between then attorney general lynch and president bill clinton. the only president of clinton we'll ever have. people want to know so you talk about golf and grandkids for the first three minutes. what was the rest of the conversation that lasted for nearly an hour. so there's many people right now who watch people for a living and type what we talk about that they can't just stop talking about hillary clinton. because she never goes away. now we find out that the fbi had pro-hillary antitrump people at the heart of the hillary investigation. very troubling. >> kelly, we just found out

lisa: moving on with hillary clinton. so there is this vanity fair or video that shows staffer staffers. pete: please, will the book tour continue. lisa: sham page smugly suggesting to new year's resolutions she should perhaps invest in. so take a look. >> time to start working on your sequel to your book what happened. what the hell happened. >> get someone on your tech staff to disable auto fill on your iphone so typing an f doesn't become form exploratory committee in 2020. take up a new hobby in the new year. volunteer work, knitting, improv comedy. anything that would keep from you running again. >> finally put away your james comey voodoo doll. we know you think james comey caused you to lose the a election. move on. >> cheers to you, hillary clinton. >> cheers to you, hillary. pete: so it's clear these are former hillary clinton for president staffers, giving a toast to their former candidate. not as friendly you might expect. >> i think it was mark twain who said that humor is the good natured side of truth. it wo

hillary clinton lost pennsylvania. here is what is interesting, and but we didn't see until about two and a half or three weeks ago in other states like this. the margin of victory's in the suburbs was pretty similar in terms of what obama had done in 2008 and 2012. the average margin of victory in the suburban philadelphia counties, you get about a hundred and 7000 votes for hillary clinton. in philadelphia -- philadelphia county, it is going democrats getsback to 1988 and she margin 65,000 votes of a of error. it is not quite what obama had done, but at that with the margin of victory she had enjoyed in the philadelphia counties -- she is basically where obama was. philadelphia,in how they expected in terms of turnout by different age groups, african-americans, anglos. philadelphia is in the southeast corner. bush won in 88, and clinton wins in his two races. see that bush beat kerry there by 350,000, and in 2012, romney defeated clinton and -- obama by 300,000. 700,000, more than the differential he was down in the

and five of them are donors to hillary clinton. and we know that there is no apparent republican on there. we have combbed, the national media combed to find them. and they are unavailable to us. >> lou, i may be embarrassed by the answer. i like hillary clinton and a dopor. and i voted for her. and if i had been asked to serve if i were younger to serve on this investigative group and i think i would have and i think i would have been fair and never have sent messages like that and i wouldn't hold those views and i don't think that just being a supporter of hillary clinton makes you unfit to sit on investigative group. i agree with you, that everybody on the group. >>>> lou: it if it is it politically charged and political moments this is not a good time to be a partis an. >> look, i don't think it should be partis an. and a justice who was appointed in the supreme court never voted because he department want to be partison. prosecutors have to stop being partisan. and that is the key. >> lou: i wished that judgment had been never

including hillary clinton and sean mills. that looks like a sham to me. >> the new talk about the immunity agreements, they gave them -- they basically blocked the fbi from looking at certain emails that would have proven up certain of justice. they love them to then destroy their computers. this is not an investigation -- >> tucker: if someone like hillary clinton does this, she gets off. >> we see this now, they use it as a political weapon. see the politicization of the fbi, so we're losing confidence in these institutions that should be bedbugs of our democracy. again, i have no idea why the fbi doesn't just come clean and provide this information to congress. what are they trying to hide? were they trying to cover up? >> tucker: how can you exonerate someone before interviewing that person or other key figures? have the answer that? >> absolutely not. other than hiding behind the nda, they are not telling us what why they won't release this information. >> tucker: you're a branch of government, you were elected by voters

my view as i say in the book t the liberal side of e hillary clinton aside tended to permeate the press and the narrative against trump was ubiquitous and yet he won: so i guess the commentary that is that despite the money spent and despite many republicans, democrats and the media against donald trump somehow defied the smear and that's why i call him the wild-card candidate of the book. host: what is the smear industry? guest: a collection of groups i've defined and some of them are paid groups, nonprofits. an example, pr firms that have crisis management functions, llc, global law firms, nonprofits, charities in some cases, websites all work together and have components that are designed to take down ideas that they oppose often by personally attacking the people most eloquent at expressing the ideas they oppose and what differentiates i like to say at least in of "the smear" from the truth is because there are often elements of truth within the smear, but it's purpose is rooted in annihilationsero and those who are directing the smear often hidden from the public want to remain inv

written by various women on what exactly they learned from hillary clinton and as an american female i feel as though i've learned so much from her myself so here's my list number one it's perfectly ok to be totally hypocritical i believe. that marriage is. not just a bond but a sacred bond between a man and a woman i support marriage for lesbian and gay couples i support it personally and as a matter of policy and law number to deflect criticism by shaming anyone who criticizes you as sexist this is a man who has called women pigs slobs and dogs number three never take responsibility for your failures last but not least number four blame russia for everything that was on the way to winning until the combination of jim crow means letter on october twenty eighth and russian wiki leaks raise doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me but got scared off the one thing that i would say that i've learned the most from hillary would be to be as far away from her brand of politics and divison from this as i can possibly be hillary has spent an entire career trying to chop

in the original version he finds hillary clinton broke the law. somebody changed the language to absolve her. who did that? and isn't that obstruction of justice if they did it for a political reason? >> the elements of obstruction of justice would be met if you had senior officials changing this statement prepared by james comey. that is the definition of obstruction of justice. there is a team of people that appear to have been involved in the drafting of this exoneration statement. james comey was involved. there were drafts sent around to other people. we'll get to the got tomorrow of who had their nantd cookie jar as hillary clinton was held to a different standard. she got special treatment because she was a asked for president. and people at the highest levels our government were helping her. gregg: .you have any evidence that would demonstrate that? >> we are in the process of taking confidential witness statements. last week we had andrew mccabe before the committee. after giving that sworn testimony andrew mccabe decided to end his caree

i am a liberal democrat who voted for and contributed to hillary clinton. but i could be fair, i never expressed publicly any views of hatred toward donald trump or anyone e else who is being investgalitied. when you have people tweeting, sending e-mails expresses rate rihatredand prejudice against te potential subject of investigation, there is a problem of bias. mueller has to do something about it. he should bring on his team, a consultant on ethics. a former judge, someone who has respect of everyone, a nonpartisan person, li -- let hr her go through investigators and prosecutors and see if there is bias among any of the people who remain on task force, and make sure this you have to be -- i cannot give the other side weapons and ammunition to attack the integrity of your prosecution, mueller has given them ammunition. lou: your recommendations are terrific, i would hope there would be within the justice department of those including the attorney general, the deputy attorney general, who would say to mueller, you just violated every ethical standard ima

couldt you pursue it as it related to hillary clinton? say if you are going to investigate one, you should investigate both. that seems to be the best standard. >> kimberly: it supposed to be fair and impartial, a thorough investigation regardless of political persuasion unless you have a vested interest in it is determined it out nomadic outcome. thank you so much, peter. here with us, tom felton ande gregg jarrett. to get you to comment in terms of the information we heard from peter and where the investigation stands and where you think it is going to go.er >> these people at the fbi were capable of protecting and absolving hillary clinton in the email case, notwithstanding overwhelming evidence of crimes. are they also, kimberly come up capable of protecting her in the uranium onee? case? it's a crime to use your office to confer a benefit to a foreign government in exchange for money. it's wire fraud, its mail fraud, its bribery, it could even be money laundering if you are foundation as a receptacle of that money. it's all kinds of

clinton and targeting president trump, in one of the reasons they were protecting hillary clinton refusing to enforce the law against the mishandling of classified information. they left this classified intel on the internet equivalent of a bench.ourk >> brian: ifç you want to know how somebody might be the president, was the last outcome and how did he like? how did they likeast to make usg a private server. how do you handle it? stay truthful, how do they likea you make on-site information on that, denying the data, and then having to turn up? and then getting angry when it is discovered in october beforeb the election that she sent classified, her chief of staff, said to back toassi her house, s is a secret, and these four cases, you found for classified emails already, only through a couple of hundred, and now almost 3,000. it is her actions that prompted law enforcement to haveç to ac, you might love comey, hate h comey, he did not want to do this. her actions f forced him toor fd this and then make a decision. correct.then make a decision. i think don lemon is going to be the fol

>> i believe hillary clinton. i know hillary clinton did not lie to the fbi. she did not lie to any committee she testified to and she did not lig lie to the public. she was a beacon of honesty in this whole matter. one way to look at it, these are not parallel investigations. the fbi investigation into secretary clinton's e-mail started in 2015 and ended by the campaign but about a year ago. donald trump is in the middle of an investigation by the fbi and special counsel. imagine if last year every other day or multiple times a day hillary clinton would tweet comey is crazy, this is a witch hunt, i don't know why anyone is listening to this guy, the fbi is in tatters. it would be absolutely insane to imagine a person running for president doing that, let alone a sitting president doing that. >> and let alone a man who did things like that, did run for president and he beat hillary clinton. >> he did. he did. in part with some help from jim comey. but i would say that there's a difference now. last year president trump used twitter very effectively. but primar

now then in a year that has seen hillary clinton try to explain away her failure to become the u.s. president with a tell all book she's now got america in her sights are washington correspondents american shares her thoughts on that. and that's exactly what hillary clinton's been doing since she lost the election searching for any way whatsoever to get back under the spotlight and when teen vogue invited her to guest at it it's december issue what resulted was an ode to hillary never the less we resist guest edited by hillary rodham clinton and it features no less than three essays written by various women on what exactly they learned from hillary clinton and as an american female i feel as though i've learned so much from her myself so here's my list number one it's perfectly ok to be totally hypocritical i believe. that marriage is. not just a bond but a sacred bond between a man and a woman i support marriage for lesbian and gay couples i support it personally and as a matter of policy and law number to deflect criticism by shaming anyone who criticizes you as sexist this is a m

clinton. -- bringing up hillary clinton. tom fitton from "judicial watch" is next. you can't predict the market. but through good times and bad... ...at t. rowe price... ...we've helped our investors stay confident for over 75 years. call us or your advisor. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. ... >> liz: let's get to your money. look at the u.s. dollar, jumping today after the senate approved a tax overhaul over the weekend, the dow transports the russel a lot of market action, positive, moves on this information coming in about the senate basically taking the bill now to the house it's going to go to conference and try to iron out the differences we could see a tax bill, but the senate's approval moves president trump and the gop closer to the largest change to u.s. tax law since the 1980s and this morning president trump commenting on general michael flynn. he compared michael flynn's predicament in treatment by the fbi to hillary clinton. let's listen. >> president trump: hillary clinton lied many times to the fbi, no

hillary clinton lacks that. democrats should beware of her reappearing. gregg: no one sees her trying to be funny in public. chris bedford, mark simone, good to see you. that will do it for us. thanks for joining us. steve forbes and ed rollins are >> another win for the president. the government avoiding a shutdown. what's next on the trump agenda? >> watch the go. stocks got a lift from the tax victory. good news, u.s. stock market futures poised to move higher at the open, about tenth of a percent. s&p and nasdaq doing well too. lauren: european investors are focused on spain where proindependance parties win in the catalonia region. will spain break apart. >> in china, the shanghai composite drifted lower. that's wha

so hillary clinton gets special justifiable. and at the same time we're sick of people who hate the president who have a bias against him on him and that's deeply unfair and something we have got it look into. brian: it's not just hearsay. here is the quote on people on mccabe. the people made to investigate it at head quarterbacks with a small team. the washington field office provided personnel to the effort. it was referred to as special and i was not given any details about it that was mccabe who, by the way, cannot go in front of the investigative committee. he has a scheduling conflict. one person will be going and that is peter strzok. so you have a problem with peter strzok who has been struck out of this. who struck out of this investigation. but his fingerprints were all over. this he did the 35,000 emails anthony weiner's laptop. he is the one who interviewed hillary clinton. he is the one who maybe trapped michael film knowing that he had the intercept. so the damage has been done from strzok. i'm curious when muelle

but hillary clinton thrustt herselfad -- if hillary clinton wants to move to barbados and do whatever hillary clinton does in her spare time, that's fine for me. hillary clinton placed herself at the center of public attention for almost a year trying to sell this book. i think it's fair to respond. i don't think i'm hillary obsessive or hater or anything like that. she is jumping around trying to be relevant. >> she is not a public figure. she is not in public office. why does she even have an approval ratings? she is a civilian. i also don't think that -- this is the most watched cable news network in the country. i don't think that you guys can spend a lot of time inordinately bashing hillary clinton and then wonder why peoplequ don't like her. >> tucker: i'm not actually bashing. let me ask you one final question. okay? i don't want to be mean, but, can you think of a single interesting or insightful thing hillary clinton has ever said? i have covered her since 1992. and i have never hard one. have you?er an >> yes. i can think of many interesting and insightful things. >> tucker:

when this was written, basically exonerating hillary clinton, they had not interviewed hillary, cheryl mills, and about a dozen other people. that looks like a sham to me. >> then you take a look at the immunity agreements they gave to cheryl mills and heather samuelson, they basically blocked the fbi from looking at certain emails for certain timeframes that would have proven potentially obstruction of justice. they allowed them to then destroy their computers. this is not an investigation about uncovering the truth. >> tucker: if i am looking at this from home -- and i don't live in washington -- why shouldn't i conclude that the powerful get a pass? if i did this, i would be charged with a felony. someone like hillary clinton does this, she gets off. >> that's the problem. we see this now, with lois lerner in the irs, politicizing the most fearsome government agency from the standpoint of most americans, used as a political weapon. we have seen the politicization of the fbi, so we're losing confidence in these institutions that should be bedrocks of our democracy. again, i have no i

over half the people on the hillary probe donated to hillary clinton or barack obama. have you weissmann, the number two, praising people for defying orders from the president of the united states and then peter strzok, the very person who may have dressed this up dossier as an intelligence document going from the clinton scandal to the trump investigation carrying his bias with him and then planning, actually planning action to undermine the president. >> tucker: do we know if the fbi paid for the dossier or any part of the dossier? >> we have asked that question of the attorney general, the fbi director, and roach stein. and none of them will tell us. how arrogant is that, tucker, that our own government will not tell us if they used our money to go and pay russians in conjunction with the democratic party? this is stuff that you would see any a banana republic. not the united states. >> tucker: i'm confused none of those people were elected by investigators. you are elected by voters. this is a democracy, supposed to be in charge of the way the government operates,