of the united states. against donald john trump, president of the united states. in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him for high misdemeanors committed as president constituting harm to american society to the manifest injury of the people of the united states. article 1. in his capacity as president of the united states, unmindful of the high duties of his high office and the dignity and proprieties thereof and of the harmony and courtesy necessary for stability within the society of the united states donald john trump has with his statements done more than incite individuals and groups of americans, more than insult individuals and groups of americans. he has harmed the society of the united states, brought shame and dishonor to the office of , esident of the united states sowing discord among the people of the united states by associating the imagine industry dignity of the presidency with causes rooted in white supremacy, bigotry, racism, anti-semitism, white nationalism or neonewt s

was of the united states towards this war effort? >> it is a good question. a difficult question to answer. thee is no question that divisions we were discussing d.rlier persiste war, and the to first several months of 1917, when you had the acceleration of these events happening -- i agree it is not just one thing that sets off the war. put those who are opposing war or intervention on the background. there are still divisions. inyou look at the votes congress on wilson's war message , they are fairly decisive. it is a decisive vote. the opponents of intervention had drawn the line in the sand earlier. senators stand from the very -- senator stone who was for wilson opposes the war 1914.es in the run uup to the decision to arm those merchant ships was an admission that the united states would be involved in war. stone turns back and supports wilson in april of 1917. he falls in line. but this unity in the democratic party persists. once you declare war, there are so many issues to decide and all those things will be deeply contentio

i would like to point out, as president of the united states, we have to remember that the united states itself has such an important relationship with this country in terms of keeping us safe as well. before we rush to make those urge alli would honorable members to keep that in mind. i hope he has heard this morning tout how seriously we take make sure all is illegal and extreme content is taken down from twitter and other online platforms and that they take more of an active role themselves in making sure this material does not stay up there. attempt, the -- sought to organize a march. nine people showed up, but that is nine to many. there is still work to do to make sure that the views of bdl and britain first do not represent this country and disabuse those who hold those views and do more. >> absolutely right. they in no way represent the views of the british people as he and i and the rest of the honorable members know them to be. as has been pointed out in the house today, the real danger of encouraging activity and extremism is increasingly online and that is where we are focusi

the united states to support the resolution 470. in his remarks, then secretary of state said the following. the draft resolution before us today is illustrated with a preoccupation that has produced a series of unbalanced and unrealistic text on middle east issues. specifically regarding the provision on diplomatic missions the secretary said in our judgment this provision is not binding on it is without force and we reject it as a disrupted attempts to dictate to other nations. it does nothing to promote a resolution of the difficult problems facing israel and its neighbors. it does nothing to advance the cause of peace. that was in 1980. it is equally true today. the united states will not be told by any country where we can put our embassy. buried even deeper in the jargon of the resolution is the accusation that the united states is setting back the prospect of peace in the middle east. that is a scandalous charge. of those who are making it should consider that it only harms the very palestinian people they claim to speak for.

the bank of the united states and this is the second bank of the united states because as you recall, from earlier in the semester there was a first bank of the united states. 1791 alexander hamilton. pushes through congress a bank of the united states. this bank a private bank with stockholders and dividends. this bank hamilton says will benefit not only financial -- private financial interests but will benefit the country, the public, how will it benefit the public, because the treasury, the u.s. treasury, will deposit money in the bank, money coming in from taxes and the treasuries, can also borrow money from the bank. this bank has a 20-year charter but it has lots of opponents. you remember, that chief opponent, thomas jefferson, hates the bank. the bank jefferson believes is an institution that imperils american liberty by elevating to power a wealthy financial elite, nonproductive elite. jefferson opposes it and jefferson comes to power in 1800, so does his party the bank of the united states the first bank the charter expires in 1811, but one year later a war erupts with brita

domestic and external problems of the united states. the expulsion of russian search of seizure and our diplomatic property, along with the removal of state flags of the russian federation, infringement of rights of the russian media, all these actions are destroying the foundation of the russian-american federation. constantly threat is used as a pretext -- the so-called transatlantic solidarity, which takes forms of military planning. hypear example is all the around military exercises in 2017 conducted by russia and belarus in september. we were accused of preparing for invasion of the baltic countries for occupation of ukraine. there were rumors that once the exercise was over the russian troops would remain in belarus. none of this happened. it was all fake news. states, the united canadian, german and british contingents which were pulled up have the pretext of this stayed and are still there in the proximity of the russian borders. comments are unnecessary. the fact we are not welcome at the u.s. congress, a place where all kinds

states i would have to tell you that it's very clear that it was a farce that the united states really pulled the wool over the world's eyes and declaring and making its way after having won world war two they made them the fall guy for war two two and equate out of the this misunderstanding of war what that first cold war was america has spent a fortune fighting this war and it's deprived its own people us the american people of better education better system more security health welfare all these things that are giving us problems now this social net that's disappearing could have come out of that instead of beans the the money being spent on the cold war so we paid a huge price for it and it never let up i remember in eighty nine there was talk of a peace dividend they talk of it what happened to the peace dividend a few weeks after the berlin wall fell mr bush sr was. going into iraq sending five hundred thousand troops to the middle east and i pointed out it was a big thing because we went when we said five hundred thousand troops to vietnam was actually under lyndon johnson that

right now the united states it's of course not just. contradicting international law but also they are becoming increasingly threats to multilateralism opportunity for. britain's prime minister theresa may says all sides of the budget negotiations are now ready to move on to the next stage of talks however there are still many obstacles the u.k. is expecting to face as artie's on this. ports. certainly in the bronx it's a deadline is looming time is ticking at what we've seen so far is that these negotiations have been anything but very simple especially maybe according to those who expect to things to move forward much quicker we've seen a theresa may and european commission president john clarke basically pot themselves on the box for breaking through with this first round of discussions when it comes to the issue of irish borders now they're looking forward to moving on to issues such as trade however we have seen the european council president donald tusk come out and say that they're going to be really some different harsh realitie

states marine, but my life never of the into the uniform united states, but every time i am with men and women of our armed forces, i am inspired. by your courage, by your selflessness, by your love of country and your patriotism. you stand here on a frontier of freedom. you stand tall and proud in defense of our families, our citizens, and our most cherished values. your mission is vital. today, on behalf of your commander-in-chief, i say to all ahead,-- in the days find your mission, take care of one another, respect the unified chain of command and never doubt that every day, every operation and every decision that you make matters to the united states of america. .ore than you may ever know you know, many people live their entire lives wondering if they have made a difference. .ut you won't have that problem everyone standing before me , stepand around me today forward to join this all-volunteer military -- stepped forward to join this all volunteer military. you chose to be part of something larger than yourselves. you have made a difference in the world. you have done a world o

nato states condemning this action by the united states and boldly disagreeing with the usa for what took place that nikki haley the u.s. ambassador took to the floor and she defended the actions by the united states and when she spoke she said that the united nations should be ashamed of this proposal that was put forward she was ashamed of the vote which had taken place she accused the united nations of not being supportive of israel of being anti israel and she was harshly critical of the international community for the proposed resolution the accusation that the united states is setting back the prospects of peace in the middle east that is a scandalous charge what we witnessed here today in the security council is an insult. it won't be forgotten the fact that this veto is being done in defense of american sovereignty and in defense of america's role in the middle east peace process is not a source of embarrassment for us it should be an embarrassment to the remainder of the security council that in response to the united states we have seen a statement from the palestinian auth

states they do so very wrong i think it's unfortunate that the united states finds itself under this kind of leadership which is undermining the standing of this country internationally the international community did not create the united nations because that was a luxury created by the following to bloody that world wars in order to prevent chaos and war in order to make sure that international law is is respected and if countries acquiesce to the us and if they accept being punching bag for the american administration and voting in accordance with directives from nikki haley then what's the point of having the united nations fact that nikki haley is threatening to derail the entire organization puts the united states in confrontation with the entire world. ten times more iraqi civilians may have been killed than previously thought during the u.s. led operation to liberate mosul from isel that's according to new research by the associated press the news agency obtained data from iraqi mosques as well as non-governmental organizations this is as many as eleven thousand civilians may

states i would have to tell you that it's very clear that it was a farce that the united states really pulled the wool over the world's eyes and declaring and making the soviet union the fall guy after having won world war two they made them the fall guy for war two two and equated hitler with stalin and also all this stuff went on it comes out of the this misunderstanding of what that first cold war was america has spent a fortune fighting this war and it's deprived its own people us the american people of better education better system more security health welfare all these things that give me those problems now this social net that's disappearing could have come out of that instead of being the the money being spent on the cold war so we paid a huge price for it and it never let up i remember in eighty nine there was talk of a peace dividend they talk of it what happened to the peace dividend a few weeks after the berlin wall fell mr bush sr was. going into iraq sending five hundred thousand troops to the middle east point it was a big thing because we went when we said five hundred

the united states would support a two state solution. if agreed to by both sides. in the meantime i call on all parties to maintain the status quo at jerusalem's holy sites, including the temple mount and also known as haram esh-sharif. our greatest hope is that for peace, the yearning in every human soul. there will of course be difficult human disagreement ad dissent regarding this announcement. we are confident that ultimately as we work through these disagreements, we will arrive at a piece and a place far greater in understanding and cooperation. in this sacred city should call forth the best in humanity. lifting our sites, not pulling us back and down to the old fights that have become so totally predictable. peace is never beyond the grasp of those willing to reach. so today we call for calm, for moderation and for the voices of tolerance to prevail over the purveyors of hate. our children should inherit our love, not our conflicts. i repeat, the message i deliver at the historic and extraordinary senate in saudi arabia earlier this year, the middle east is

i would point out, as president of the united states, we have to remember that the united states itself has such an important relationship with this country in terms of keeping us safe as well. before we rush to make those changes, i would urge all honorable members to keep that in mind. i also hope he has heard this morning about how seriously we take the issue of making sure all illegal and extreme content is taken down from twitter and other online platforms and that they take more of an active role themselves in making sure this material does not stay up there. >> in a cynical attempt to harness the brexit vote, they suck it organize a far right march. just nine people showed up, but that is nine too many. the you agree with me there is still work to do to make sure that the views of bdl and britain first do not represent the mainstream of this country and they are of horrid there is work to make sure -- we should bring forth more to make sure theirs we can do? >> my friend is absolutely right. they in no way represent the views of the british people as he and i and the rest of the

states, but clearly this is an overwhelming defeat for the united states. does it mean much? that remains to be seen. most of the speakers said basically that declaring jerusalem the capital of israel is illegal. it violates international law. it violates at least a dozen or so previous u.n. security council and other resolutions. that's their point. and they said essentially this body and their countries are not for sale. they called what the united states is doing blackmail, bullying, and they said they would not stand up to it. where this goes from here is unclear. does this help the peace process? most people don't seem to think it will. the united states has been saying all along that they think there will be a short-term negative reaction to their declaration about jerusalem and their announcement to move the embassy, but they've believed all this opposition will go away. the israelis think it will make it possible for peace because the palestinians will understand they're not going to get to their capital. but the backers strongly disagree with that.

united nations because the united nations spends so much money in the united states in new york so in so many ways the united nations among other global institutions serve american interests even if sometimes in the case of israel they continue to criticize or to condemn israel simply because the united states continues to defend israel and reject and veto any criticism or condemnation of israeli occupation and violation of international law so really this more than blackmail there's a certain. type approach when the american president goes like this and says you will pay and we will make a lot of money off you that's not that's not the global system that america built i don't know how my naive thinking oh start rethinking that this goes ahead happens behind the scenes anyway it's just an extraordinary thing for the president to say it publicly but there are just tuning in for in this diplomatic channels where people say make sure you vote the right way surely that's been happening for other yeah but i mean there's also something to be said about. going public with intimidating leader

the united states can't wish it away and pretend it can remain the global power. it's a new reality that china and the united states are coe global powers and have to find a way to coexist and solve together global problems rather than butting up against other and confronting. >> president trump actually spoke very moderately with moderation when he delivered the executive summary. y actual 55 pages contains very harsh language about china. the strategic competitor and taking america for a ride and having an unfair program. if you were china, what would you be thinking at a time when america wants to you help tame north korea? >> first of all i think china sees the trump presidency as more of an opportunity than a threat. i think they believe that they can deal with president trump and thou play him. this is a big strategic opportunity for china to displace the american power influence around the world. if you go to european capitals, you ask what is the most important. they will say international trading system. we agree with china on that and they will see the r

what all of us in the united states senate would call casework. somebody brings us a problem and we work to solve it. and the goal, and in fact my belief is the outcome of this legislation reduces the amount of casework, which isn't about reducing our workload. it's about making certain that veterans don't have to come to their congressman or woman, don't have to come to a united states senator to get the services they are entitled to by law and by moral obligation. we don't learn from history. we need transformation. we need something more than just saying let's keep the current process in place for awhile longer. you know, following world war ii, general omar bradley was assigned the task of overhauling the v.a. for the millions of americans who were returning home from world war ii. he said some important things back at that point in time. bradley rightfully kept the needs of veterans at the forefront. he said we're dealing with -- quote -- we're dealing with veterans, not procedures. with their problems, not ours. the goal and the outcome of g

the united states owned 1/5 of its capital stock, $7 million, and the president of the united states appointed five of the bank's 25 board members of -- member of the board of directors. it did the functions of today's treasury department. it broke her to federal loans, federal loans, it received a stored, it transported and paid out government funds. it issued bank notes, which were the countries only paper currency. the bank was also a commercial business. it loaned money in competition with other banks. it made profits, and it paid dividends. clothed by its charter with -- and these words are in the charter -- with exclusive privileges and benefits. operating throughout the land when every other bank in the country was confined to a single state and most to a single city. at a time when the treasury department itself consisted of a few dozen washington clerks on a scattering of land offices and custom offices throughout the country. the bank of the united states was literally the only national financial institution in the country. it held immense power over the functions of govern

thing the united states is asking china to do more on the korean peninsula but the united states is insulting and humiliating china are many other fronts and this is not a consistent message from washington i think the better message from washington is to create consistency and continuities of its positions and asking china really to get along with the united states i think in this way china and the united states will be better to coordinate their actions on the d.p. r. k. nuclear weapon question but also on other major issues in the world involving major international issues but also major pilots are all issues between china and the united states richard waits in washington there are military exercises planned for just around the corner if those military exercises were canceled or delayed would that help because you then give you then give a signal surely to pyongyang that china is not going to wobble because pyongyang needs to know that that security aspect is there and arguably the south koreans would be happy as well the idea i can't tell when these exercises it's something that

united states. he can order that the football, which is communications package and strike options package be brought to him. he can choose a strike package within a minute and using the communications authentication device in his pocket, he can order the nuclear forces to launch a minuteman three missile in 30 minutes it will strike north korea and detonate. no one is in that chain to stop him. >> one thing you hear people say is well maybe someone will tackle the president or prevent the president from doing something. isn't it illegal in this instance of a nuclear monarch, isn't it illegal for someone to disrupt that chain of command if a nuclear order is given by the president of the united states? >> when you and i had this conversation in early september 2016 and you wrote a "washington post" op ed about nuclear weapons, i told you about a period where it was at a nuclear command post pulling a watch shift. we asked how do you stop this. the joke there was tackle him. of course you know that's

states more in the past by the united states. but pakistan as a neighbor. there are two two. strong contrasts they had in our views with regard to pakistan. when we became refugees after the soviet invasion of afghanistan the pakistani people who welcomed us tremendously and believably like brothers and sisters and we lived as if we lived in our own homes in afghanistan and that will continue a very bags they're making for the v.a. back in the in which you. i thought it out that area that carried the welcomed us tremendously as as refugees but then as backers of the afghan resistance against of the former soviet union them and the americans also. did the most horrible. activity of trying to weaken the afghan traditional system of our own to weaken our moderation to weaken to weaken our tolerant society and to turn our asian into an extreme tool in their hands against the soviet union for the americans and for their own purposes for pakistan which we resisted which we denounced but which would lead to the eleventh which would lead

and the united states. nafta, that will dissipate, no question. old -- we are concerned about a of the strong relationship built over the last 25 years between canada -- mexico and the united states. a broader point here, what is the message to the rest of old -- the rest of the world? cannot geted states along with her two neighbors, mexico and canada, and they have to destroy a create -- a trade agreement, which has done tremendous positive results for all three countries, if they cannot get together with her two neighbors, how will they get together with other countries and other parts of the world? carla made the point a little earlier on a trade agreement with another country, how can you count on the united states? so there is that. the third point i would make is on order management. i was ambassador, after 9/11, a real challenge we had was order management. if there is a breakdown in attitudes toward managing the border in the positive way, we are going to get affected in canada almost as much as it

of the united states should not. act by pressure and coercion on other states i think is it's there's not a fan as this is not compatible as he saw in the quality of stays states must be able to all pronounce themselves freely in the general assembly of the united nations and take said decisions freely was out i eat outside hindrance i think and if president trump takes it personally is this a not good parameter because it's not a personal matter between him and the palestinians he's a president of the united states and he should take care of the interests of the united states and also over israel saying we also have to take care of see long term interests of the jewish people. you have an interest in peace and stability in the middle east how unprecedented is this move by haley sending a memo to one hundred eighty countries basically instructing them how to vote does this happen knowledge time in today's united nations well you know you can always as i do a stage you can always suggest stars or countries that they s

think in the long run this will pressure to see united states president see interests of the united states the united states is visibly isolated on that issue and if you are alone or if you'll act alone without the support of your allies and friends this will put you in a very difficult situation and in the long run at least you know be very harmful to your own interests. all right we're going to take a short break right now and when we're back we'll continue disk. the u.s. recognition of jerusalem as israel's capital. into the fragile middle east peace talks with christian former head of the u.n. international law commission. you mean you don't. see. what they did they could put it. to what they did not through only ten space. let alone kill said. no servant it must be that. you speak french. let's. send. the bill to its left it's called. the skies are fine it will survive a little taste a little bit of l. i'd. love to visit this is a central plank support dying at the moment i'm going to call them when they stop to. about it under them i did but that's not a cut i didn't know me much. on

what you think is the right step for the united states? and to your point about congressional authorization. where is the republican party leadership and the senate on that? and what kind of signals are you getting from the white house from the president, from the national security advisor? >> well loved, neck, i think they're both questions. as i mentioned i think they're interrelated. i think that your diplomacy as i mentioned, is much more effective if your adversaries believe that it is a continuum. and the military, credible military options are part of that continuum. ... >> chick really given this regime how unpredictable they are. i think the focus of our diplomacy is not necessarily negotiations with north korea. who decade after decade proves to be a very unreliable partner to negotiate with and don't think they have ever kept one bargain ever they have agreed to with united states. you cannot trust them or the iranians. that is our focus with regard to diplomacy and private lead discussions with regard to china on how to solve t

states or rely on the united states either for their own security and survival or rely on the united states in terms of conflicts that they themselves are waging either amongst themselves or against other states and in that context i don't think they're going to privilege anything concerning the palestinians over the their bilateral relations with with the united states and i think you know nevertheless it's it's not meaningless that at a time when arab states and governments are so divided over the various conflicts in the region syria yemen libya and so on that they could at least. not be divided by the palestine question as well that's not meaningless but under the circumstances it's certainly not particularly significant either you now have what might be called an incipient rebellion in the occupied territories that needs concrete support and assistance and none of that has been forthcoming either from the arab league or from the organization of the islamic conference similarly these states could for example have put in provisions to make their own relations with third parties wh

thing the united states is asking china to do more on the korean peninsula but the united states is insulting and humiliating china are many other fronts and this is not a consistent message from washington i think the better message from washington is to create consistency and continuities of its positions and asking china really to get along with the united states i think in this way china and the united states will be better to coordinate their actions on the d.p. r. k. nuclear weapon question but also on other major issues in the world involving major international issues but also major pilots are all issues between china and the united states richard waits in washington there are military exercises planned for just around the corner if those military exercises were canceled or delayed would that help because you then give you then give a signal surely to pyongyang that china is not going to wobble because pyongyang needs to know that that security aspect is there and arguably the south koreans would be happy as well the idea i can't tell when these exercises is something that o

or two states wednesday blue state that's not up to me i'm from the united states i don't live there but with israel having now sent six hundred fifty thousand illegal settlers into palestinian territory there is no contiguous territory available to create a state so the notion that there's going to be a state there's going to be two capitals for two states is simply not such a given it's one of many possibilities and it's by far not the most likely right now so i think that we have to go back to international law that says jerusalem is a separate body it's not part of the there is it's a lionel a palace that is an issue it is a corpus separate i'm missing a middle status issue exactly mr melbourne i mean if you look at the situation right now i mean if there's been this attempt to create a deal a conventional way led by joe but you see of the backlash in the arab and muslim world people now no longer believe the americans are honest brokers there is a new dynamic in the region there is turkey which is seen as spearheading first to save the palestinians isn't this something which is

that's analogous to what's happening the united states and this best case scenario here in the united states has fifty odd sites with communities schools that i looked at that are mile from burn sites also similarly being exposed to these clouds of toxins and you know it was a long fight to bring attention to the issues of the burn pits overseas there's been no fight to do this similar so you know take any sort of action here in the united states no measurement of what is in the pollution that's you know dead. that's touching the school grounds or the residential areas around these bases no statement from the department of defense in my reporting that that was worthwhile or something that they should do and really i mean and that's with laws that are supposed to limit this and promise that it's not and say so i'm glad that you mentioned that the really lack of some might say accountability others might say recognition i do want to share this because as we mentioned the department of veterans affairs applying to join our show today but this is what it says on their website at this time

the united states would be taking names in fact and the president of the united states donald trump also reiterating backing up those claims saying that the u.s. would in fact reduce eight of those countries who voted in favor of this rejecting the u.s. moving its embassy from tel aviv to jerusalem recognize interesting as the capital carson just tell us briefly is this to be taken seriously these threats from the united states the strong language. a kind of rule that the u.s. not seeing of the few countries to make an example of them and actually reduce it but if you look at most of the countries and have pushed this vote here countries like egypt like turkey like jordan the u.s. is not supporting them because the us is so nice in this regard it's because the united states has strategic interests in supporting these countries militarily and otherwise so once again i'm not sure that this will do a lot but irritating a lot of allies of the united states on the world stage karsten tell us a little bit more about the domestic situation there in the united states and why these words mig

together without the united states and in a way that will welcome the united states should if you turn ministration as jim says the side to get back in the game of multilateral trade agreements so they're continuing to press the administration on this issue but we've not actually seen any progress so far gentlemen we have to move on many thanks don't call me that in sydney and also jim walsh in boston great to get your joint insights on that developing story many thanks. the palestinian leadership is condemning the u.s. veto of a u.n. draft resolution on jerusalem it would have required president trump to rescind his recognition of jerusalem as israel's capital the u.s. was on its own at the security council with the other fourteen members all voting in favor of the resolution mike hanna reports now from the united nations those against. the u.s. exercises its veto when the resolution fails and then at some bastard a sharpie attacks the fourteen other members of your security council that voted in favor what we witnessed here today in the security council is an insult it won't be forgo

shall not accept any role for the united states in the peace process. on the other hand you have president trump and you're always vaunting this ultimate deal as they called it supposedly in the pipeline and will be revealed next year if and when such a proposal comes forward from the united states what will happen to it if the palestinians are prepared to negotiate first there will be no deal without a palestinian partner i mean this is i mean this is the strongest point that. can hold true. so if he threatens that he will not be part of any sort of peace process if he's not he's not going to be in this. vision i think that it will be no deal this is why we believe that the weakest side in this equation might also be moved to be the strongest one because of course you can all sort of brush up on me you can actually sort of decisions against me but you cannot actually have this process without me so it's it's me who is going to legitimize your efforts in order to build peace in this in this region or to solve this almost seventy years or conflict now so

their social media if they want to say the president the united states or canada candidate for the united states presidency trump he's an idiot that's fine with me that's a personal opinion but when you start talking about an insurance policy that's when i start getting concerned because these are unelected officials meddling in the election. and these are these people are supposed to be apolitical it least nominal p. there is a really hard time for a new church commission to be instituted in the west to get the crimes committed and the we want you and me my only a few words with the church commission is all over the church commission was a commission existed in the seventy's after the water great their great crisis it was obvious that during watergate and long before it the f.b.i. and other special series of churches conducted. on the us territory against us citizens that were eagle that were unlawful and there was widespread. feeling of distrust there were towards. be icy and other special seriousness and the church community was setting the wish to carry those crimes and set new standa

of the united states. jackson kept a private memorandum book in which he jotted down occasional notes to himself. into this private memo book he copied hamilton's entire memorandum on the bank, 6 1/2 pages long. parts of it are traceable in jackson's own veto of the bank of the united states two 1/2 years later. well, in january 1832, four years before its charter was due to expire the bank formally applied to congress for a renewal. this timing was not accidental. a presidential election was coming up in the fall. jackson had declared against the bank in three annual messages. his opponent, henry clay was an advocate for it bank. and clay and bittal, president of the bank who were in communication with each other, calculated the bank was so obviously if had dispensable to the country that jackson would not dare to veto a charter and if he did, they'd make anni iss out of it. some of jackson's counselors favored rechartering the bank and that has fooled historians if had to thinking there was possibly some

around a table of dialogue with the united states? because they will think that, perhaps, after years of talks and potential agreement, the next u.s. administration could step over or pull out of the agreement achieved. so such potential action by the trump administration will block such potential roads to success in resolution of regional problems around the world. >> if you were to meet president trump, what would you say to him? >> [ speaking persian ] >> translator: the way in which, currently, thus far, the u.s. administration has chosen to stand against iran and the jcpoa has been the wrong one. and the proof has been experienced by previous administrations in the united states, and the conclusion is natural to reach, that what the obama administration did in order to achieve success in this engagement, vis-à-vis the jcpoa and iran, drew upon the unsuccessful experiences of previous administrations. however, the path undertaken today by this u.s. administration is a return to the past, to a distant past that goes all the way ba

the united states has attempted to respond to this challenge. through continuing dialogue to what has been referred to as an offset strategy. the development, evaluation, and ultimate fielding of new capabilities intended to preserve and extend the technological advantage of u.s. forces and our allies. these technologies are likely to include new systems capable of operating at extended range. now cause hopes to create a video of man, in the air, on and under the sea, and in space. it will leverage advances in robotics, machine learning, and intelligent systems to provide operational advantage. the united states deputy of defense and -- have both emphasized the critical cavity of innovation, experimentation, and new technology in recent remarks. both are working to line planning with modernization of objectives. and to accelerate these efforts. leadership has been emphasizing the same themes. u.s. industrial leaders have emphasized they are working on delivering the capabilities envisioned in the third offset discussion. i see a similar emphasis

there's a vivid example of the united states golf courses and. swimming pools and all kinds of manatees. right next to it is what was called the slum of the pacific and said it's a challenge by. is in great need right now we talked about infrastructure one of the projects the u.s. is working with our australian colleagues and with the asian development bank is a sewer and water project desperately needed for e-vite he buys overcrowded schools need repair actually the u.s. military did a survey back in the seventy's and found that the sewers didn't work and the water didn't run and the electricity wasn't there and only happened nor all that long ago they found almost exactly the same thing why why hasn't that been fix we've there's complete agreement that by should be a priority and not only because of the current activities of the ronald reagan space and missile defense site but there's also now an additional component that is providing for global security and that's the space fence project by the air force. every missile fired on the marshall is

apparently now north corÁns have capability to hit anywhere in the united states. they are progressive more than we give them credit. why do we do this? what do we do? we are talking about stiffer sanctions, someone is providing something to north koreans to keep them through sanctions, would they do the trick? >> the united states has not applied hardly any pressure against the country who has aided and abetted north korea and that's china, until we begin that in earnest, whether affecting banking industry, we still have lots of economic and measures that we can employ along with diplomacy to be able to head off any kind of military action. on one hand, while we need to prepare it. we need to put systems in place, whether it's that'd -- thaad or be prepared when this threat continues to grow, oarpd, we need to have a lot more pressure put on china because they are the ones causing this. neil: you know, commander, i'm wondering if the chinese, i'm sure they were given a heads up of launch missile test before north koreans did it, maybe not, they had senate represen

states to legally be in the united states. there was a discussion on capitol hill as to how you would make these 11 million people leave the country and then come back legally to then start whatever process of immigration and legalization was put on the table for them. mexico at the time told congress, one thing is mexicans or central americans were relatively close. if you are from india or china or poland, and you go back and then come in, it is a bit of a challenge. mexico said, we would be want to 11 millionto take in people if you could process them in mexican consulates, and then that way we could help ensure that those individuals in the country without papers could come back in with a legal status so we can get that off the table. that debate which was happening 2009, today in the current circumstances despite how important it would be to what we've the needle forward, it is off the table. it would be political suicide for anyone in mexico today -- to put that on the table. that is an example of how this use of mexico

the united states is by far the single largest contributor to the united nations and its agencies. we do this in part to advance her values and interests. when that happens our participation in the un produces great good for the world. together we see, close, and educate desperate people. we hold out machines accountable. we do this because it represents who we are, it is our american way. but, we will be honest with you, when we make generous contributions to the un, we also have a legitimate expectation that are good willis recognized and respected. when a nation is singled out for attacking this organization, that nation is disrespected. what's more, that nation is asked to pay for the privilege of being disrespected. in the case of the united states, we are asked to pay more than anybody else for that privilege. unlike in some un member countries, the united states government answers to its people. as such, we have an obligation to acknowledge when our capitals being poorly spent. we have an obligation to demand more for investment. if our investment fails we have an obligation

states and will raise further questions about whether the whether or not the united states can be an honest broker in working out an arrangement between israel and the palestinians many people argue this has little to do with peace or security but instead is about boosting the political standing of a beleaguered american president for months the trump administration has been dealing with the impact of a scandal that seemed former top officials criminally charged god bless israel god bless the palestinians and so the jerusalem announcement breaking decades of protocol allows trump to keep a campaign promise and refocus attention on his policies he won the election not in washington he won it in wisconsin and michigan and places like that and what he said was the problem is with washington and if he didn't do this he would becoming part of washington in so. therefore his own base not not on this issue but on keeping your word is important. but white house officials admit it could be years before the embassy moves which virtually insurer's this will be an issue in the next presidential

how do you ski for the united states and openly say you despise the president of the united states. should she be allowed to ski under those circumstances? >> oh, judge jeanine. we do have freedom of speech in this country. judge jeanine: that's a very good answer. but it is very disappointing. >> people are looking for an escape. they can't go watch the nfl anymore. award shows have turned into one political rally after another. now the olympics are going there as well. judge jeanine: michael tammero, it's so good to have you in studio. "street justice" is next. to thil money managers are pretty much the same. but while some push high commission investment products, fisher investments avoids them. some advisers have hidden and layered fees. fisher investments never does. and while some advisers are happy to earn commissions from you whether you do well or not, fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management. coaching means making tough

first, the involvement of the united states and the war with the united states. when we think of america's relationship with the first world war as being from 1917 to 1918, we are missing the main point. united states was deeply involved in this war in a variety of ways. much earlier than american entry in 1917. the other thing this poster is attempting to get across is it is part of the movement that began -- that was known as prepared ms. p but the united states should or should not do to change its own society. to change its way of thinking. in response to events with -- that were going on in europe. the question of how the united states interacted with the first world war before entry is something we have a lot of wisdom on,l half-baked ideas, but not really a lot of solid research. the book i worked on, path to war, was an attempt to do this. to understand how a large, diverse, complicated society, like the united states, was responding to the events in europe and how that response condition that only american howy in the war, but americans responded to what

right now the united states it's of course not just. contradicted in the national law but also they are becoming increasingly a threat to multilateralism. closed its airspace to all drones including those are paraded by the united states as story much more after a short break you are watching our two international. why i want to raise it then how did return to london why it's a liberal city was it is a cool learning the more important. that i learned the plants the airports in the south and invincibility percent of the in many liberated why why do you think you have to meet. no russian flag will fly at the twenty eight winter olympics but there will be russian athletes. the russian national anthem will play out during official ceremonies but fans will probably acappella rendition you can take the athletes out of the country but can you take the country out of the athletes. or welcome back you're watching our international have with us now britain's prime minister theresa may says that all sides of the budget negotiations are now ready t