. >> thank you, mr. knapp. one final question. i'm not sure if you commented on this item revising the social history or reviewing section eight, which includes relevant information, the founding of the ymca >> that was the thing -- the way the planner and i both saw it eye-to-eye. the historian in sacramento said move all that stuff to the end, which i did and then the planner didn't even get the photos, by the way. so the communication here is not seamless so she didn't know that the order you see it in was what the historian in sacramento judged best. >> ok. thank you. >> are there any questions for mr. knapp or for staff? that the time, we'll take public comment at this time. any member of the public have any comments? seeing none -- >> actually, i do have a question. >> ok, commissioner pearlman. >> that last point that mr. knapp made about whether it should go in as a community building or not, can you exmine why you think it should'nt? >> because by suggesting that it was a community building type that it was relevant to th

mr. knapp? >> the proof is in the pudding on timing. can we all do it in time and get it on the agenda? i'm happy to work with it. i don't know, you are out workload. i don't know the workload of the historian. i don't know how many days ahead she has to have it final. so that would be my only concern. >> mr. knapp, i'm sorry. tim frye, department staff. if i could interrupt for a second. i don't believe this would feel to come before the commission again. so, that may address your concern. i think what the commission would do is direct staff to make edits and send a positive resolution to the state commission. >> at the state level, you may want to make the tweaks. >> commissioner johnck? >> i'd like the get this right. thinking about what mr. churney said about the coit tower. [laughter] and i think if all of this is a tweak and the staff can get it done. i mean, i'm just -- >> mr. knapp would be doing it and staff would be reviewing it. correct. ok. >> the something usually the commissions have to get out the agenda with the staff re

i'm just wondering if there is something about this particular date, mr. knapp? you know something about this? >> maybe i didn't explain it before. they meet four times a year only. and in the hopper of nominations, the staff in sacramento have approved, they can't hear them all at one hearing and there is this jockeying. so my concern is not only could we get bumped three months, then we could be competing with other people who are better at lobbying than we are and find ourselves bumped six months. that is my concern. >> ok. i appreciate that. thank you. that's helpful. thank you. is >> commissioners -- >> oh, ok. [laughter] i'll move that we -- i'll move the staff recommendation that we do the edits, that we explained here and described today. and that mr. knapp work with our staff to support our recommendation for nomination to the national register [inaudible]. >> thank you. commissioner hyland? >> i just want to understand mr. frye and ms. mcmillan is -- can we commit to working with mr. knapp to get the edits done so it doesn't get booted off of this -- >>

mr. knapp, are you making your presentation? >> will five minutes be adequate? >> i'll fry. yeah. thank you. [whispering]