rometty: our founder, thomas watson. david: now, watson got some attention because of jeopardy. ms. rometty: the game show. it is funny how many people still remember that. i really give us credit if i might for having sort of relit the world of a.i. you asked what i did early in my career. i was an a.i. specialist at one time. that would be a couple decades ago. it isn't like a.i., itself, is brand new. there is a number of things that make it different at this point in time. what we did back then, it was 2011, with "jeopardy" and we had been working on a.i. for a good five years before. this gets back to this idea of if you're always moving to where you think there is value, in tech, we believed there would be value in this data and you had to be prepared for this world to do it cost effectively and, more important, you had to have technology that didn't get programmed. that is the difference. that's what watson and a.i. is. meaning what watson does, you don't say if this, do that. every device you have has been programmed, if this, do that. somebody had to tell it what to do. you

david: watson is named after -- ginni: our founder, thomas watson. david: watson got some attention because of "jeopardy." ginni: it is funny how many people still remember that. in fact, that was -- i really give us credit, if i might, for having, sort of, relit the world of ai. you asked what i did early in my career -- i was an ai specialist at one time. so that would be a couple of decades ago. so it isn't like ai itself is brand-new. there are a number of things that make it different at this point in time. and what we did back then -- it was 2011 with "jeopardy" -- we had been working on ai for a good five years before. and this gets back to this idea if you are always moving to where you think there is value in tech, we believe there would be value in this data, and that you had to be prepared for this world to do it cost-effectively, and more important, you would have to have technology that did not get programmed. and that is the difference with what our -- that is what watson and ai is. meaning what watson does -- you do not say, what watso

david: watson is named after -- ginni: our founder, thomas watson. david: ok. watson got some attention because of "jeopardy." ginni: it is funny how many people still remember that. in fact, that was -- i really give us credit, if i might, for having, sort of, relit the world of ai. you asked what i did early in my career -- i was an ai specialist at one time. so that would be a couple of decades ago. so it isn't like ai itself is brand-new. there are a number of things that make it different at this point in time. and what we did back then -- it was 2011 with "jeopardy" -- we had been working on ai for a good five years before. and this gets back to this idea of if you are always moving to where you think there is value in tech, we believe there would be value in this data, and that you had to be prepared for this world to do it cost-effectively, and more important, you would have to have technology that did not get programmed. and that is the difference with what our -- that is what watson and ai is. meaning what watson does -- you do not say, "if this, do t

david: watson is named after -- ginni: our founder, thomas watson. david: ok. watson got some attention because of "jeopardy." ginni: it is funny how many people still remember that. him people still remember that. in fact, that was -- i really give us credit, if i might, for having, sort of, relit the world of ai. you asked what i did early in my career -- i was an ai specialist him career -- i was an ai specialist him at one time. so that would be a couple of decades ago. so it isn't like ai itself is brand-new. there are a number of things that make it different at this him him that make it different at this point in time. and what we did back then -- it was 2011 with "jeopardy" -- we had been working on ai for a good five years before. and this gets back to this idea of if you are always moving to where you think there is value in tech, we believe there would be value in this data, and that you had to be prepared for this him you had to be prepared for this and him and world to do it cost-effectively, and more important, you would have to have technology th

thomas w watson rushes engagement syria what outcome would please moscow. momost has been involved i n this is you know for a very lolong time it't's been inid militarily and of course financially as well as a lot of money. on the fight will those missiles and so over those more than two years thatat it's been involved is built up a huge amount influences place itself very much in the sense that. all a a peace broker. in the syrian civil war that'ss why we in sochi that's why. i'm here in boss's day in these. by half thousand delegates. here is well suck. buses home remade concrete dispsposition in n syria ann thesee peace. negotiations whatat it wantnt now is very much a attention to howow t. that the warar is mostly ovr of course russia wants peace up on its terms and the more that the accents place despite moscow's rhetoric the mall that the accent is placed on. these sought she talks. on the less on the geneva talks the better from russia not all were arrestea most of a moves up they got party says he will run for the country's top job. the just last we