. , but theyto be big will be bigger. they have not been properly represented. because of that, workers in our country have not been properly represented. we are going to build our steel industry back and we are going to build our aluminum industry back. you to hear from a couple of folks in the room. we will have a few speak and i might want to start with u.s. steel. a massive company years ago and got smaller and smaller. for 33with caterpillar years. he did a great job. they brought him in and he has been there for a short while. he wants to build it back up. dave, maybe you can say little bit to the room into the press about u.s. steel, where they were, where they are going, and what did you think of what we're going to do? >> thank you, mr. president. and thank you very much you for your leadership on this issue. and commerce secretary, thank you very much. this is vital to the interests of the united states. this is our moment. and it's really important that we get this right. the alternatives that the commerce secretary presented were all good alternative

trump is hoping the tariffs will theyto negotiations, but are not really the most direct tool to address the issues. rishaad: what is? negotiations have been tried. there has been a lot of lip service paid to protecting intellectual property. we know from diverse sources that it has been just that, lip service. >> the debbi tos adjudication process needs to be accelerated -- wto's adjudication process needs to be accelerated. if it wants to survive as a referee and the global trading system, it needs to make that change, but basically is some off youromeone rips intellectual property, you sue them. think about the iphones made in china. now they will face a 25% tariff. does that protect apple's intellectual property? no. haidi: i'm going to be glass half-full, if you will, and i wanted to get your views on how this plays out for china's economy. is this going to be perversely positive when it comes to forcing structural reforms, overcapacity, and forcing china to rebalance quickly away from manufacturing toward services, and could even be good for domestic producers and domestic consumpt

of the frustration of get into talks with north korea and not succeeding buying them time to do what theyto want to do. dso i have very, very confidene in what their intent might -- if their intent is for denuclearizing we have sewn no that point. to that decision -- >> general do you have a view on this question? >> ie agree with the director. i mean everything we've seen, leads uss down a path that realy the preservation of the regime from many kind of external threat is central to that weapons program. and lessons he's taken away from gadhafi that have given up programs puts him at risk. and it was surprising to see that. in the papern this morning, and we'll see where the talks go. >> thank you. >> thank you, senator cruz. me make a comment about that because i'm glad you brought that up senator cruz we talked about this earlier. and general ashley and i had a disagreement about this. let me tell you why i feel a little differently than both of you. i -- i too have been here while you've been here dan, and we've listened to this. we've seen this movie before and all of that. but you've