likely you and the united states we don't do this. we don't have the resources or manpower to organize this total state of control, not part of our plan and it is clear we did nothing of the kind against trump. >> i would like to ask a couple specific questions about nato. if nato were to move to at ukraine or georgia to the alliance how we respond? >> translator: negatively. the situation around nato is going along those lines. i have a clear understanding of the decisions i made. before the consensus-based decisions are made on the organization there is an opportunity for bilateral conduct with member states, poland, romania which deploy elements of the strategic antimissile defense of the united states, direct and immediate. accordingly, moving this nato infrastructure towards our borders would be a threat and reaction would be extremely negative. >> secondly there are two major nato exercises leaders this year, anaconda and trident. did you and donald trump discuss those and did he give any indication as he did with chairman kim o

but we also have to be fair to the people of the united states and the taxpayers of the united states. youprime minister, thank again for joining me for these important discussions. we are both outsiders to politics. can you believe it? to politics.ers i look at all these wonderful politicians. we are determined to protect the rights and needs and interests of our citizens. i look forward to partnering with you to build on the incredible it from -- incredible friendship between our countries and to creating a brighter future for both the people of italy and the people of the united states. and with that, i want to thank you very much for coming to the white house. it is my great honor. prime minister conte: good afternoon, i want to thank you for your hospitality is it -- hospitality. it is a sign of the special attention to italy and me as well. forgive me, but i don't want to renounce the privilege for speaking in my wonderful language now. translator: i wish -- for all of families of the victims the fires at the place in california. i wish to say a very affectionate hello to all ou

of relations between the united states and russia. person he hasn't and blames the person he stood shoulder to shoulder with today, vladimir putin. on friday, rob rosenstein and bob mueller and it president trump the evidence that president clinton had requested, between nine page on -- undyed is amazingdictment work and is what the president should have used to stand up to mr. putin. he should have demanded justice. rather than take the opportunity to confront putin, rather than take the opportunity to demand that putin hand over the named agents, thelligence president sided with vladimir putin's denial over the unanimous conclusion of the united states intelligence community. kgb overhe word of the the men and women of the cia. blame onan placing , the president put what is best for him over what is and for the security well-being of the united states. what if now looms, anything will congress do in response to this awful trip? where are our republican colleagues? where are the republicans who roared approval when reagan told gorbac

, not denying that the united states is a democracy. do you believe the united states is a democracy and if so, if it is a democratic state, then the final conclusion in this kind of dispute can only be levered by rial, by the court, not by the executive, by the law enforcement. for instance, the concord company that was brought up is being accused of judgments, but this company does not represent the russian state, and i rought several examples. well, you have a lot of individuals in the united states, take george soros, with multimillions in capital, but it does not make the posture the posture of the united states. no, it does not. it is the same case. there is the issue of trying the case in the court, and the final stage is for the court to deliver. we are now talking about the private individuals, not about particular states and as far as that most recent allegation regarding russian intelligence officers, we do have an intergovernmental treaty. please, do send us the request. we will analyze it properly and we'll send a formal re

you're not denying united states is a democracy do you believe united states is a democracy? if so, if it is a democratic state then the final conclusion in this kind of dispute can only be levered by trial. by the court not by the executive, by the law enforcement. for instance, the concord company that was brought up is being accused, it's being accused of interference, but this company does not constituently russian state, does not represent russian state and i brought several examples before well, you have a lot of individuals in the united states, take george soros, for example with multi-million capitals but doesn't make his posture, the posture of the united states. no, it does not. satisfaction there is the issue of trying the case in the court, and the final say is for the court to deliver. we're now talking about private individuals and not about particular states and as far as the most recent allegation is concerned about russian intelligence officers, we do have an intra governmental treaty please do send us the request. we'll analyze it properly and we'll send a

states senate, the united states house, and the united states president. >> the forensic evidence and the allegation. remember, every one of them supported by evidence of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is enormously compelling but also equally important is what's left unsaid to the americans who are named in the indictment, not by name but, in fact, they are included. and the other americans that may be targets of the investigation. there's also a message to the members of the house of representatives who engaged in that stunning spectacle last week where they were ha ranging and harassing constituents their concerted campaign to discredit and stop this investigation. it is about our national security. the next step for the united states congress has to be to persuade or compel the president to address this threat to our national security. it affects not only our american democracy but also democracies around the world. and now more than ever at a time of threat to western democracy from this cyberattack by vladimir putin, we need to be rallying together. i think the united states se

of the united states. ideally, if the sides would write down in simple clear terms what denuclearization covers so there is no misunderstanding down the road. other questions? go ahead. identify yourself. >> thank you. is --stion [indiscernible] i was wondering if the u.s. should accept north korea's demands to some extent, or just focus on denuclearization? kelsey: one thing the trump administration has rightly acknowledged is that onuclearization and progress peace and security on the korean peninsula need to go hand-in-hand. there needs to be a reciprocity between the steps. i think figuring out when to how the reciprocal steps might be is important. the enda declaring to of the korean war, and negotiating a treaty on it. i do not think declaring an end gives up all of the leverage united states has in that space immediately. i do think it is important to commitmentss a vis on the nuclear side. daryl: the heart of your question is one of the fundamental points we are trying to make. secretary pompeo jus

by and large, that is what we do with the united states. we can do more, and we can work with our central american friends. i think there is sufficient common ground in that respect. walter: a question from the audience that leads into our discussion, i think, concern about the drug cartels and wondering how policy might change vis-a-vis the narco trafficking with the new administration, what the state of play is, how effective have we been at limiting the rise of these cartels? amb. gutierrez fernandez: if you look at what most people think, i think it is clear we have not been successful enough. that's another statement. security, or rather insecurity, is something that gravitated very much in mexico's election. for the right reasons. i can only think, first of all, the last two administrations in mexico have confronted, as best as possible, organized crime. by many different metrics, we are not doing a good enough job. it wouldn't be appropriate not to recognize that. i think it's a very -- i think number one, we need to take into accoun

i don't think the united states can be satisfied. i don't think we can be satisfied and i don't think central americans can neither be satisfied. it's a very complex issue. you need to address the root causes of migration. and that's not easy. we must do everything we can, mexico, central america, to make sure that immigration -- as it has happened in a vast majority of the cases. that's not the responsibility of the united states. that's on us, i think. we certainly welcome the support of the united states in that regard. and the measures that have been taking over the years to address prosperity and security in the region are welcome. i just think we should do enough -- we have not done enough. i think it's appropriate to recognize that. i think it's in the interest of the united states to work with central america and mexico in that regard. i've seen an openness to address these issues on the part of president trump's administration. next week is there will be a working meeting and we expect to have a second conference either late

the largest nail plant in the united states. it's not an industry that has been particularly well in the united states. they have largely displaced the u.s. nail industry. we would have this conversation outside on the lawn. it was trying to hold itself against the tide. it was brought by their provider of steel. in the first encounter in the story of the book. they go to the midcontinent plant and says were going to expand the plant. down the street they have just closed and air-conditioning print and moved it to mexico. they have every reason to believe that they are next. i talk about this. this is a complex relationship. our relationship with mexico has been critical in creating jobs overall in the united states. there is a net benefit to us economically. you can't separate the industrial platform. it doesn't mean that no jobs had ever moved to mexico. it doesn't mean that no american companies had ever come in this is a complex relationship. a lot of things happen. the workers look to him distrust fleet fully with every rea

that is what we do with the united states. can do more and we can work with our central american friends. there is sufficient common ground in that respect. theer: a question from audience of that leads into our concern about the drug cartels and wondering how change vis-a-vis the narco trafficking with the new administration, what the state of clay is, how effective have we been in limiting the rise of these cartels? amb. gutierrez fernandez: if you look at what most people think, we have not been successful enough. insecurity, has gravitated in mexico's election. think that the last haveistrations in mexico confronted as best as possible, organized crime. methods, where not doing a good enough job. it would not be appropriate not to recognize that. i think, we need to take into account that this is an issue that takes a long time to address. experience in other areas of the world would point to the fact that there are no silver bullets to address this. number two, we need to do a better job in the conversations we've had wit

work that the united states wants to have. is that consideration is extremely important so i personally still think that the united states we need to find a way around delay the solution. on the margins of me getting back to it but it cannot be implemented in a way that is seriously actually makes the ability of india to be a part of this defense bill what the united states wants to have now i personally see it as a bit of a paradox of the american power structure when the defense policy of the world's second most populous country reaches india is being held hostage to some senators you know in new jersey or a club i wonder how is it perceived in india the fact that any given country would . attempt at least to tell you who to do business with and who not to do business with you know is as countries grow bigger. they see that. the orly's a quid pro quo kind of place and certainly prime minister more they has built many many bridges in his forty years. you know he has gone to some fifty five different countries to build his bri

this has been shown to benefit have more states, we high skilled and high paying jobs in the united states to run these manufacturing organizations. it's a transitional area. jobs in manufacturing have been declining since the 50's, we used to have 35% of the workforce in manufacturing and percent, itst nine following the trend of agriculture due to high levels of productivity. it's also true that other countries have not been working or treating the united states fairly when it comes to market access and exports. this is where we need to keep our focus. the key for the united states is that what is produced here can actually be sold on a competitive basis in other markets. that is where we need to focus our trade policy. instead of doing the opposite. comments onle of twitter. the people getting degrees for skill sets that are overpopulated and the workforce, we need to focus on skills-based secondary education, vocational and trade schools. another says remember when the gop was pro-free trade? , me china shop. that wholet's not cars can import from other countries, it's that car parts,

the tactics we now see where the united states imposes tariffs, the united states threatens more tariffs and china responds appears to have gotten their attention but more tariffs is not the answer. any further escalation will cause undue harm to u.s. farmers, to farm families, manufacturers, consumers and businesses. the very people and industries that ustr is designed to help. the effects is very real in my home state of kansas and they're feeling the pressure. a farmer in cloud county, kansas, stacy forcy and her husband grow corn and raise cattle. they will begin the fall harvest in the coming months and it's coincided with the reduced farm income. which has fallen by 50% since 2013 is driving kansas farmers like them to the edge. all told it has been an estimated $361 million of kansas exports are being threatened by various tariffs. bottom line, trade and exports are how we earn a living and farmers and ranchers and our nation's manufacturers cannot afford a prolonged trade war. ambassador lighthizer, thank you for joining us this morning and i long forward to your testimony. i'd l

the united states are feeling the pressure. a former in kansas, fifth-generation family of farmers where they gross way beans, corn, wheat and also raise cattle -- they and many of their neighbors will begin fall harvest in a couple of months. the increased prices was. have already reduced from income, which has fallen by 50% in 2013. it is driving kansas farmers like them to the edge. all told. estimated $361n million of kansan exports being threatened by these terrorists. bottom line, trade and exports are hardly earn a living in kansas, and farmers, ranchers and our nations manufacturers cannot afford a prolonged trade war. thank you for joining us this morning, i look forward to your testimony. i would now like to recognize the ranking member of this committee, senator shaheen, for her opening remarks. sen. shaheen: thank you for being here this morning, i appreciate it the opportunity to speak with you early this week. the senate commerce bill for provides $57.69 million for the united states trade representative, as well

either a country which has tweeted the united states -- treated the united states unfairly gets a fair deal or gets hit with tariffs. remember we are the piggy bank that is being robbed. all will be great. what effect could trade disruption have on eli lilly? david: the president of the united states right now is speaking at a vfw convention in kansas city, missouri. >> this incredible organization. that's what it is. it's incredible. i'm honored to be here today in kansas city, missouri area -- missouri. to pay tribute to the men and women who make freedom possible to francis -- kansas city and what a special place. what a special group of people. the veterans of foreign wars. very proudshould be of yourselves. i want to personally thank each and every one of you who have served our country in uniform, defended our nation in battle and protected our great american flag. i also want to recognize a great kansas city legend who i met today at the plane. somebody i have been a fan of for a long time. a member of the baseball hall of fame. george brett of the kansas city royals. he's aroun

the intelligence agencies of the united states but also the people of the united states. he took a kgb officer, a known liar's word for it. why he did so if it had to do with the desire to not be seen as illegitimate, i don't know. i can't really get into that. i'm not a doctor. but i can tell you, on the facts the united states was attacked. and president trump today sided with the enemy. >> how unprecedented is that, especially here on foreign soil? >> it's -- i mean, first of all, we say this about president trump every week i think. doing something unprecedented. it's incredibly unprecedented. also, when's really shocking is there used to be a thing in the country where if a poll sirn didn't try to understand what was special about the united states of america, and the ideals to which we strive, the fact that we don't think of ourselves as brutal, we think of ourselves as at least trying to spread democracy throughout the world, and with the foreign aid we offer, et cetera, president trump -- used to be if you didn't express belief for that in politics you were dead i

states and the taxpayers of the united states. mr. prime minister, thank you again for meeting me for these important discussions. we are both outsiders to politics. can you believe it? we are outside of politics. we're both determined to protect the rights, interests, and dreams of our citizens. we will do that. i look forward to partnering with you in building on the incredible partnership of our countries and creating a brighter huge are for both the people of italy and the people of the united states. with that, i want to thank you for coming to the white house. it is my great honor. thank you. >> good afternoon. i wish to thank you for the kind invitation and warm hospitality. after the -- of my government. of specials a sign attention to italy and to me as well. forgive me but i do not want to -- speaking in my wonderful language now. >> [translator speaking] thank you to all of the families and of --s of families the fires that took place in california -- also an affectionate hello to france. our relationship goes way back.

i don't think it's fair to the united states. so, we're going to have to do something because we're not going to put up with it, we can't put up with it and it's inappropriate. so, we have to talk about the billions and billions of dollars that's being paid to the country that we're supposed to be protecting you against. you know, everybody's talking about it all over the world. they'll say, wait a minute, we're supposed to be protecting you from russia, why are you paying billions of dollars to russia for energy? why are countries in nato, namely germany, having a large percentage of their energy needs paying, you know, to russia and taken care of by russia. now, if you look at it, germany is a captive of russia because they supply-- they got rid of their coal plants and got rid of nuclear, getting so much oil and gas from russia. i think it's something that nato should look at it. you and i agreed that it's inappropriate. i don't know what you do about it, but it doesn't make sense that we have to defend them against russia. >>

on foreign soil, president trump said the united states was equally to blame with russia in the state of the relationship countries,ween the trashed american intelligence, took the word of the kgb over the men and women who work so hard at the cia. the president's behavior has left everyone in the united states scratching their heads. his behavior was so bizarre, so to americaneterious interests and our national security that millions of americans are left wondering if putin indeed has something over the president. that is indeed the most logical explanation of the president's behavior. now the question looms -- what will the senate do in response? republicans seem to be shrugging their shoulders. some of them claiming they have done all they can. statements are not enough. we need action. republicanst unless and join us in bipartisan action. here are a few things that the senate can do immediately in response to the president's disastrous summit. we can ratchet up sanctions on russia and not water them down. in the senate, they have not been even fully implemented. we want to make su

maybe he won't squeeze the president of the united states either in the next election. the thing that is that. is the perception right now that trump is the united states look or see this because he is the president but he is the united states fully the full use of research so there really be people in. the year in japan in canada says yes flipping to react and we're going to deal with whatever he's shows it does but let's not go all the way let's take a look you know in another couple of years what's going to happen are the americans still going to be gung ho after an american america first america alone president or they can just say chickie was recorded all wrong so i think that right now while all different various governments state the trying to whether it's the. the canadians or the e.u. or japan they're likely to be very grown up about this and say yes we're going to react to specific cities said the trumpet ministration it certainly does but let's not go sort of let's not hyperventilate just. go but. do you agree with that or does it matter if the rest of the wo

states and selling them in the united states. not far down the road there is a tortilla company owned by mexico and there is a plan to the next town over in hazleton and was also potato chips if any of you have been on the east coast the official potato chip from the boston red sox owned by a mexican company. factories arthe factories are in owned by the companies hiring american workers and it is an interesting story not because this is the story of the freetown in the united states because of some of the complexities and the relationship between the two countries that we do not often think about in the period that there were lots of people across the border, the flu that largely ended up after 2007 mexican capital coming across the border and it is a story that we know very little about but it's fascinating. it's not just bread and tortillas, but they are among the largest in milk and yogurt, hot dogs and lunchmeat, cement, pre- paid self-service and the port of los angeles largely operated by a joint mexican venture, the comme

not including the united states. and the united states commitment to nato is very strong, remains very strong, but primarily because everyone, the spirit they have, the amount of money they're willing to spend, the additional money that they will be putting up, has been really, really amazing to see it, to see the level of spirit in that room is incredible, and i hope that we're going to be able to get along with russia. i think that we probably will be an i believe to. the people in the room think so, but nevertheless, they stepped up their commitment and stepped it up like they never have before. so we took in an additional 33-- the number could actually higher than 40 when they give you the final number. the secretary-general will give those sometime probably today in his concluding press statement, but we are doing numbers like they've never done before or ever seen before, and you'll be seeing that and i guess you'll be hearing that a little bit later. okay. we have our secretary of state, as you know, and we ha

lend lease did, indeed, rescue britain but also rescued the united states. it mobilized the nation's industrial might from coast to coast. factories that had produced lawn mowers, vacuum cleaners, textiles started making gas masks, automatic pistols and high-precision instruments. the automobile factories began to build cars and labor force was booming, millions of men and women of all ages streamed into factories and worked on assembly lines, vocational high schools were on overtime, training and retraining american men and women for new roles in the workforce. the manager of the state employment service in the small city of york, pennsylvania, said in january 1941 a year ago our task was to define jobs for men, now our task is to find men for jobs. and what about housing? all the new workers needed places to live near the factories and so roosevelt set up an agency called the division of defense housing that supervised the construction of 2 and a half million new homes along with schools and recreational facilities. all this powerful activity and energy pr

energy states and the united states are also a very important. resources state and we can work together in markets and it's. drained also from all of the sectors of the economy possible of course to have ellen she has a very important. resource. we are not interested. in too high prices because it will make it difficult to develop processing capacity capacities in developed economies and so there is a few for cooperation even between countries as far as north stream too is concerned. mr president you have talked to your concern regarding the transit through ukraine and i can assure you that russia is willing and ready to keep this transit through the crane up and as far as the translates contract is concerned when you reduce. of coolers. they also an operation pending still in stockholm between emergency business companies orders. thank you mr president you tweeted this morning that it's u.s. foolishness stupidity and the muller probe that is responsible for the decline in u.s. relations with russia. do you hold russia at all accountable for anyt

look at the united states how the european union has taken advantage, systematically of the united states on trade. it's a disgrace. so, it's not an easy negotiation. >> mr. president-- >> can i ask you a question. john roberts, go ahead. >> can i ask you a question. >> no, no, john roberts go ahead. >> cnn is fake news, i don't take questions from cnn. cnn is fake news. john roberts from fox, let's go to a real network. >> we're a real network, too, sir. >> some people have suggested the relationships between the united states and russia are at the lowest point since the end of the cold war and you have stated many, many times you think it's important to have a better relationship with russia. is there any way for relations between the united states and russia to improve as long as putin continues to occupy crimea. >> yes, i think so. i think i had a he have a very good relationship with president putin, i may be wrong, it didn't work out, but i'm different from other people. i think we're hurt badly by the-- i'd call it the witch hunt. i'd call it the rigged witch hunt after watching so

i don't play games between russia and the united states. i don't hold it hostage on this internal political struggle. and it's quite clear to me this is used in the internal political struggle. and it's nothing to be proud of to use such dirty methods and political rivalry. >> do you think that mr. mueller is trying to sabotage the relationship? >> translator: i don't want to make any assessments about his operation. it is his congress that appointed him, to do this, to assess his performance. and i think court had some doubts about appointing special counsel mueller to the position he now holds. but that's none of my business. >> says none of his business there. let me get a quick reaction. >> none of my business, of course not. this is covert action, the part that conducts the covert action furthermore why would hi ever comment. this is a brilliant success. if your goal is interfering in an american election, to sew discord, how about the president with allies, he didn't have a conversation with the eu and the brits. it why would he comme

the united states looks pretty unstable. bullying could get you, you know, some investment, but, you know, lots of firms have announced that they are moving their investment out of the united states, letting people go. excuse me, i misspoke, i said lots, it's not lots but it's starting to happen. i think in particular for industries that need immigrants, they are getting a very hostile message. now, is it happening with tons of disinvestment? not yet. so i don't want to be misleading and say, but i see lots of evidence happening in the most competitive sectors, and that freaks me out. >> mark? >> if i could just jump in here, too, because, i was in london last week, and there was a big anti-brexit demonstration at the time. and one of the things that's quite striking is that this is not just an american phenomena. the british are going through exactly the same thing, and are perhaps a bit ahead of us in facing the challenges of how you remove yourself from an international system of trade and replace it, and what's becoming

russia and united states. definitely you can take over leadership in this is your and organize their cooperation at all that come here any tearing crisis to help during the foot return or for two to literally refuse to return to their homes for their effective cooperation in syria we have all the necessary components i want to remind of our military man they've got experience of all called coordination they have parity of channels of cooperation which enabled us to not to allow dangerous incidents and put. unpredictable collisions on soil on it and i want to stress after the defeat of terrorist in the southeast of syria in the south the zones this is the situation today holland hides should be. in compliance with the with the agreement of nineteen seventy four on the separation of israeli and syrian. forces it would allow to return peace to the whole and hides. so that will peace between syria and israel and to that to ensure the safety of the syrian state. and i would like russia is interested in such a devel

the russian president or the united states official who work for you? and asked him whether he would denounce moscow's meddling to president putin? here's how president trump responded. >> why haven't they taken the server? why was the fbi told to leave the office of the democratic national committee? i've been asking that for months and months and tweeting it out and calling it out on social media? where is the server and what is the server saying. with that being said, all i can do is ask the question. my people came to me, dan coats came to me and some others and they said they think it's russia. i have president putin. he just said it's not russia. i'll say this. i don't see any reason why it would be but i do want to see the server. but i have -- i have confidence in both parties. i really believe that this will probably go on for a while. i don't think it can go out without finding out what happened to the server. what happened to the servers of the pakistani gentleman that worked on the dnc? where are those servers? they're missing. where are the

you are in the united states where we're talking to you. do you think that this administration is minded to help pursue these kinds of moral and judicial cases and accountability and let's not forget it was the united states under the obama administration which moved mountains to norm normalize relations with myanmar and support democracy there. >> we have grave concerns about the withdrawal from the human rights community by the united states, that includes withdrawing from the human rights commission. these cornerstones or accountability, the icc, the rome statute, the international criminal court, those represent international rules that we have worked toward to establish accountability for perpetrators. so to the extent the u.s. withdraws from those mechanisms we believe that is not just counterproductive, it emboldens future perpetrators. >> dr. homer venters, thank you for joining us. >> thank you so much. >>> we reached out to the myanmar government for a response to allegations raised by this report and in that interview but we have

many of us in the united states feel the way she does. she's touched on trauma that affects young children. thed you talk about what trauma is for these young kids? these kids are going to grow up. what lasting effects might there be, and how does that affect the foster care system? i work with foster care kids in the courts. the system is taxed already. i wonder if you could talk about the long-term effects. guest: thank you for your comments. the long-term effects are deeply documented. there's a long history of child develop and research that talks weut the lovers of all, think about children from the border, the consequence the having a level of toxic stress that creates lifelong impact, potentially. for the children we interviewed, the millions of children who are fearntly being affected by , stress, the lack of access to health and nutrition that they need, by uncertainty in their housing and their parents' jobs, for those children there is also a powerful body of research about the individual consequences of each of those things. t

soldiers back to the united states. our military has moved coffins to the demilitarized zone to prepare for north korea's return of the remains. this issue comes up when i talk to veterans in wyoming and i wouldn't be surprised if it came up when the president was there with the vfw. could you give us any update on north korea's compliance, what they had agreed to do relating to the remains of our veterans. >> they reaffirmed their commitment to return remains that they have in their possession as well as to begin to work on an agreement that had been in place previously about how we would conduct recovery operations inside of north korea and we will in relatively short order if the north fulfill s its commitment begin to put teams back in place so that we can return not only the repatriation of existing remains but the recovery of remains that have not yet been recovered. i understand it's not directly on point with denuclearization. i get that, but for the families that are missing loved ones, it's a big deal and i'm

the united kingdom and the united states are bound together by a common historic heritage, language, and heroes. the traditions of freedom, sovereignty, and the true rule of law were our shared gift to the world. they are now our priceless inheritance to a civilization. we must never cease to be united in their defense and in their renewal. before our dinner last night, melania and i joined prime minister may, mr. may, and the duke and duchess of marlboro for a tour of the winston churchill exhibit at blenheim palace. it was something, something very special. it was from right here at chequers that prime minister churchill phoned president roosevelt after pearl harbor, in that horrific war american and british service members bravely shed their blood alongside one another in defense of home and in defense of freedom. and together we achieved a really special, magnificent victory. and it was total victory. prime minister may and i have just come from a very productive nato summit that was truly a productive summit. where my top priority was getting other nato members to pay their full

look at the united states. how the european union has taken advantage systemically of the united states on trade. it's a disgrace. so it's not an easy negotiation . reporter: since you attacked cnn, can i ask you a question? president trump: john ronts, go ahead. no, john roberts, go ahead. cnn is fake news. i don't take questions from cnn. cnn is fake news. i don't take questions from cnn. john rockets of fox. let's go to a ale -- roberts of fox. let's go to a real network. reporter: thank you, mr. president. some people have suggested that relations between the united states and russia are at their lowest point since the end of the cold war. you have stated many, many times that you think it's important to have a better relationship with russia. is there any way for relations between the united states and russia to improve, as long as putin continues to occupy crimea? president trump: yes, i think so. i think i'd have a very good relationship with president putin, if we spent time together. i may wrong. other

least, the secretary of state would use the same terminology to address the goal the united states is pursuing. if the two sides would write down what right what the new -- what -- what denuclearization covers. it seems to me dplk is -- ifing denuclearization the rest of man's, it would lose u.s. demands, it would lose -- the trump administration has rightly acknowledged denuclearization and progress on peace and security on the peninsula need to go hand-in-hand. there needs to be a reciprocity between the steps. declare aut when to declaration on the korean war and how it fits is important. declaring the end of the korean war and renegotiating a tree on it. eclaring an end -- renegotiating -- renegotiating a treaty on it. declaring an end -- nuclear side. question heart of your is a fundamental point, it is to be an action for action process. potn senator pompeo went to -- given secretary pompeo went to ponding -- to pyongyang -- they emphasize the steps they were taking, the mandy moore from the other side. as a result, they went away from the discussions disappointed. bothderscores

today no country does more two-way trade in the indo-pacific than the united states. in southeast asia, the u.s. is the single largest form of investment larger than china, japan and the european union. open amount of the indo-pacific today and it's dotted with u.s. and efforts to build self-reliant business institutions and promote private sector growth. the philippines, there was a business that helped the country return into a crucial part of the semiconductor semi chain. in malaysia general electric invested in a sales and service center, and today, 1300 employees in the country from kuala lumpur. i want them and their leaders to know that america stands ready as we always do for partners around the region, to deepen government, people to people ties based on our shared democratic values, i'll travel there in the week ahead. chevron was the first company ever branded oil expiration rights in thailand and in 1973, they discovered the first hydrocarbons in thai waters. this gave birth to a major local industry. today chevron is thailand's top natural gas and crude o

interests most people in the united states think that putin has the goods some dirt on trump so this is not just me this is what the public thinks now normally want to hear it because it doesn't comport with his view the were eight hundred million to one going to happen here i'm going to know how you know this that you you know i know i'm really sorry we can carry on this debate a little bit later but for the time being i'm afraid i have to say that this whole fire is not so gentlemen thank you very much indeed. mo news the top of the hour. this is a poem bus broadcast around the world from washington d.c. i'm partial to thanks for joining us we appreciate you hanging out with us coming up today we focus on inequality around the planet we'll be joined by professor richard wolfe and our t. correspondent on your part and bill looks at a recent united nations report on poverty in the united states and some reactions at home and abroad plus the c.e.o. of straw market we're word which looked at the wealthiest and poorest nations around the world and r.t. correspondent trinny charges goes

what if they make a deal as reported in the united states that the united states agrees to allow assad to stay where he is and pulls out troops and hoping that russia can move iran back and then abandon the field to russia and iran. it is really serious. these things and putin comes in well prepared. we were talking to jake the last time and president kennedy when he met with his russian leader in '61 was unprepared a. >> there is certainly plenty to be on the table. what will be on the table and how is it discussed? we will see and see together. christiane amanpour and jake tapper, thank you. we will go back to new york. we will keep you aware of the schedule as people are showing up. good to see you both. >> you, too, chris. great to have out the ground for us. we are mention away from putin and trump meeting. our analysts are here next. lilly. she pretty much lives in her favorite princess dress. but once a week i let her play sheriff so i can wash it. i use tide to get out those week old stains and downy to get it fresh and soft. you are free to go. tide and downy together. send yo

we saw the chief law enforcement officer of the united states, the president of the united states, stand up next to a russian dictator and take his side against the law enforcement agencies of the united states. that's a stunning development. if you saw that in a movie, you would question it and say it was absurd. so it's a very dangerous state of affairs there. trump's mastery of what -- when asked about the intelligence officers that committed a crime against our republic starts talking about hillary clinton's e-mails. there's absolutely no symmetry between that at all. he's trying to deflect that. one of the things i think that's been a problem and i don't know how to address it. i'm sort of with bill, gobsmaged and flummoxed at the same time. we are under attack from russia. if there were physical missiles, americans would be in the streets and protesting and asking for the president to protect us. these are invisible missiles. these are digital missiles going into our system. we can't see them. we have a hard time explaining them. dni coats said the red light was blinking like just

kingdom and the united states are also strengthening cooperation between our armed forces who served together in battlefields all around the world today the prime minister and i viewed several u.s. u.k. special forces demonstration. we saw some demonstrations today frankly that were incredible the talent of these young brave strong people. we saw it at the royal military academy at sandhurst seamless cooperation between our militaries is really just vital to addressing the many shared security threats we have threats far different than we've ever had before they've always been out there but these are different and they're severe and we will handle them well we also recognize the vital importance of border security and immigration control in order to prevent foreign acts of terrorism within our shores we must prevent terrorists and their supporters from gaining admission in the first place border security is a national security problem and in the united states we are working very hard to get the democrats to give us a couple of votes so we can pass meaningful and powerful border secur

so that part of that income generated in the united states stays in the united states but the taxpayers don't have to pick up the difference of that 138 billion. with a small fee, 1%, two, it makes me no difference. my question is what's your opinion of that and i'll ask ms. lynch what your opinion is. >> that's an interesting thought. i don't think, i think that could be potentially subject for legislation should you decide to go that route. we, i will say there's other countries in the hemisphere that do tax remittances that happens as they come in. haiti is an example in a case that i know of. beyond that i don't think i would choose to comment. >> okay. >> ms. lance, do you have an opinion? >> i also think it's very interesting, i think we would have to do further analysis. i know sometimes remittances are something we look at as a way to reduce foreign assistance. we would be happy to look into this and analyze it. >> i think congress ought to consider it strongly so we keep some of the money in the united states but 138 billion is a lot of money even for us. >> thank you, mr. chai

or into the united states from abroad. if companies are trying to serve foreign markets, their incentive may not be to pick up and moving factory already in production because those are huge investments with long lifespans. about ahey are think new factory or production line, they definitely could take these tariffs into account. this was an example of the steel and aluminum tariffs. recently we saw harley-davidson make an announcement, saying it did not want to pay this tariff that the eu put onto its bikes in response to president trump steel and aluminum tariffs and would be shifting production out of the united states for bikes it provides to the eu. host: this is from a union at hyundai, saying their alabama plant could be the first to shut down under the president's tariff plant. that could endanger 20,000 jobs. guest: that is a huge number of jobs. the president has celebrated every job he has brought into the united states. that has been a big focus for him, to bring factories back and the united states. this idea

he said i think the united states has been foolish. insulting and blaming the united states, saying i think we're all to blame. those are his real feelings. he shared his real feelings in helsinki, so now what? >> when i talk to the folks that are still doing the heavy lifting, they continue to do their duty. they expect to tell the truth in a way best suited to communicate to this president to get it in his head. that is a challenge that we have with all of our chief exec tiffs. >> how do they phrase things to get in his head. how do you do it with this president who seems to reflexively revert. and in this particular case. they say it had no influence on the election, and occasionally you can get him to say something like the russians meddle. i thought it was striking when he said i agree with the agreement that the russians meddled, but he didn't say who or why. i would have been struck and impressed if they said that yesterday. >> it's worse than we know because your friend has said that the warning signs, the warning lights, are b

united states. the problem today is not the russian people. the problem that needed to be .amed today was vladimir putin instead, our president decided to advance a fake moral equivalency the place right into the hands of vladimir putin's bloody hands. everybody in this body should be disgusted by what happened in helsinki today. i yield the floor. announcer: democrat chris murphy also spoke out against the summit on the senate floor. murphy:: madam president, in my lifetime, no american president has ever had more disastrous overseas trip than the one that was just concluded by president trump. five days of disaster after disaster, insult after insult, capitulation after capitulation. today, donald has america weaker in the world the end at any time in recent memory. let's start with what happened today that has the whole world reeling. to the shock and horror of the american public, president trump stood on stage with vladimir putin and told the world that he believes putin when putin insists russia did not try to interfere in the american e

states and the united kingdom. countries that of course are very much opposed to trump's policies in many ways his policies of trying to seek some kind of agreement with most. countries and certainly with russia and probably behind the scenes with china and as we saw korea of course we can talk and we have talked many times in the past on this program. about the vested interest in not promoting that kind of cooperative agenda there's an agenda of course of confrontation and there are too many vested interests and now we can go into so i think from what i've expected to be a response he received and he's played that quite well he's if you like go to the media go to the deep state establishment the political establishment united states by saying hey we're inviting this arch enemy of the entire world and he's portrayed in the media over here to the very homeland itself then when there was the shock and awe over that and then when nobody reaction came by saying ok well and then of course in steps. chessmaster and invit

i think the united states can help with regards to lng. quite frankly, when you challenge our traditional trade partners in europe with tariffs, it does not necessarily get the type of response you want from their political system. i still believe the president's way of doing business has created a lot of uncertainty, which is not good. david: fair enough. isn't there at least the lowering not just tariffs, but also barriers to trade that should have been done some time ago? senator cardin: we will see. we wanted to enter into a trade agreement with europe. that was on the table before the trump administration took office. we do need to improve, remove some of the barriers that exist between europe and the united states. that's one of the reasons why it started in the last administration. there were talks about trade agreements with europe. wery: and also today, saying are close to finishing an agreement on nafta. even if theyn -- even of an timement is made, is there to get a vote on this this year? senator cardin: i've been told that it

the united states is trying to be in a region. when they are there the only job thier doing and they have shown that they do is creation of the terrorist group who are risking tone during the time his tenure in the foreign ministry he. has so a meeting. she. disappeared in the creation of the terrorist group in syria and iraq if you recall in the. states. president trump. choose into the new or the people who are. here ultimately agree with mr trump in the in these coalition he wanted to in a change in into the only change you follow the same policy that. created do you think you may have other things in common with mr trump and at least in the way how he conceptualizes there is no and you come in purple common policy between us and the sutra and there could be no more overlap of views on how the region develops we're not. because we know that. he. has your only policy you know or the war you're against any kind o. expansionism and any kind of. or any other country now as the americans keep on insisting on the. removal of the iran