complete lie. >> tucker: does the democratic party ever become the democratic party of 2012? or 1998? or a party concerned with the economics and something other than identity politics? >> it doesn't look like it. there was an interesting article. you won't hear these words out of my mouth often. in the "new york times" this week by thomas edsall breaking down the polls on how the democratic party has changed. i just noticed looking at it, looking at nancy pelosi. white liberal women have gone off the charts on left wing crazeness and nothing to do with the economics. the democratic party as some of us notice in the clinton era. that is when it began in the clinton era. abandon the working class. it's pedal to the metal on the identity politics and the yupie lifestyle. yuppie and welfare demographic. >> tucker: ann coulter. "resistance is futile." thank you. the wife of bruce ohr appeared on capitol hill. we have details from that after the break. there are so many toothpastes out there which one should i use? choose one that takes care of your gums and enamel. crest gum & en

me of that and this is and this is where the democratic party the radical democratic party the rat lab will try to take us back to its way around value with the presumption of innocence no lie or lie could be utterly let me and let me go to los angeles ron how do you know but are you ready to die the democratic party but peter ok daniel real quick a little good around here democratic party is not a radical left party sorry well that's really the point ron you know i don't have to go to rowan ragout up really early for this scared her up and run a lot has been said go ahead in riyadh. oh yeah i kind of echo yeah the democratic party is not a radical left party they're not even a left party in my opinion i would describe them as a center right party. and i think that's kind of the when i say we're in neutral you know the best kind of what i'm referring to you know going forward when we're looking towards the midterms. you know people are saying there's going to be some blue wave i do think that trump fatigue is going to be enough to pick up a little on the democratic side but as far as f

party the radical democratic party the rat lab will try to take us back to his way our value with the presumption of innocence now my life could be utterly let me and let me go to los angeles run how do you know you want to die the democratic party but peter ok daniel real quick a little good around here democratic party is not a radical left party sorry well that's really the point ron you know i don't have to go to rowan ragout up really early for this fear of ron a lot has been said go ahead in the aggregate. yeah i kind of go yeah the democratic party is not a radical left party they're not even a left party in my opinion i would describe them as a center right party. and i think that's kind of the when i say we're in neutral you know the best kind of what i'm referring to you know going forward when we're looking towards the midterms. you know people are saying there's going to be some blue wave i do think that trump fatigue is going to be enough to pick up a little on the democratic side but as far as framing a messy. jen framing policy positions and framing boyd is in actual op

party but peter ok daniel real quick a little bit around here democratic party is not a radical left party sorry well that's really the point ron you know i don't let me go to ron ragout up really early for this fear of ron a lot has been said go ahead in the aggregate. oh yeah i kind of go yeah the democratic party is not a radical left party they're not even a left party in my opinion i would describe them as a center right party. and i think that's kind of the when i say we're in neutral you know the best kind of what i'm referring to you know going forward when we're looking towards the midterms. you know people are saying there's going to be some blue wave i do think that trump fatigue is going to be enough to pick up a little on the democratic side but as far as framing a messy. jen framing policy positions and framing in actual opposition the democratic establishment has not done that they largely have not done that. so when you don't really have a real opposition in our politics which i would say at the establishment level we really don't have. you know you just kind of have.

party but peter ok jenny real quick a little bit around here a democratic party is not a radical left party sorry i truly the point ron you know i don't even go to run ragged up really early for this. run a lot has been said i got it in riyadh. yeah i kind of echo yeah the democratic party is not a radical left party they're not even a left party in my opinion i would describe them as a center right party. and i think that's kind of the when i say we're in neutral you know that's kind of what i'm referring to you know going forward when we're looking towards the midterms. you know people are saying there's going to be some blue wave i do think that trump is going to be enough to pick up a little on the democratic side but as far as framing a message and framing policy positions and framing boyd is in actual opposition the democratic establishment has not done that they largely have not done that. so when you don't really have a real opposition in our politics which i would say at the establishment level we really don't have. you know you just kind of have. the nonstop echoes fear of t

eight no party like a democratic party because the democratic party don't stop.

complete lie. >> tucker: does the democratic party ever become the democratic party of 2012? or 1998? or a party concerned with the economics and something other than identity politics? >> it doesn't look like it. there was an interesting article. you won't hear these words out of my mouth often. in the "new york times" this week by thomas edsall breaking down the polls on how the democratic party has changed. i just noticed looking at it, looking at nancy pelosi. white liberal women have gone off the charts on left wing craziness and nothing to do with the economics. the democratic party as some of us notice in the clinton era. that is when it began in the clinton era. abandon the working class. abandon the flyover people. it's pedal to the metal on the identity politics and the yuppie lifestyle. yuppie and welfare demographic. >> tucker: ann coulter. "resistance is futile." thank you. the wife of bruce ohr appeared on capitol hill. she testified about her work with fusion fusion gps. we have details from that after the break. ♪ d to. but then, we were like. what are we do

it is called the democrat party. i watch what they say -- the democratic party. in many cases, those are the people who want to make it look as good as possible. it is the democrat party which does not read well. the other reads better. we will call it the democrat party, and it is openly inviting millions of illegal aliens to break our laws, violate our borders, and overwhelm our nation. [booing] pres. trump: the democrats want caravans and like them. a lot of people say, i wonder who started them? mexico has been so incredible. the leaders of mexico, thank you. do you know why? mexico respects the leadership of the united states. thank you, mexico and we appreciate it. what they want -- and by the way, we started the wall and it is moving along. i want to build it rapidly. i can do it in a year. we did $1.6 billion. we have another 1.6 billion and it sounds like when you are pres. trump: the democrats do not care about what the extremist agenda will do to your hospitals into your schools. the democrats don't know that a flood of illegal immigration will bankrup

a member of the european social democratic party or a member of the italian or the german social democratic party. and we had the idea wouldn't it be good to develop this one step further wouldn't be good to have a leader or a peon wide political party that you can become a member of so that would be just one example there's a whole range of issues that we need to just break down in terms of what they mean if we're probably european so that would be just one aspect. i'd be interested in knowing often you said that. the question is that the s p d wants to work through you want to conclude these until the party congress twenty nineteen so what are these issues and is that mean the process of renewing the s.p.d. will be concluded in january. where we came up with a couple of issues that. are scaling back to myself think are important to debate but there are some others that are being debated as well and we will conclude the list as it were of issues by next week you know what are we going to do with the social welfare and climate protection labor. issues around spelling out what being pro euro

party but peter ok jenny real quick a little good around here a democratic party is not a radical left party sorry i truly the point ron you know i don't let me go to rowan ragout up really early for this fear of ron a lot has been said i got it in riyadh. yeah i kind of echo yeah the democratic party is not a radical left party they're not even a left party in my opinion i would describe them as a center right party. and i think that's kind of the when i say we're in neutral you know that's kind of what i'm referring to you know going forward when we're looking towards the midterms. you know people are saying there's going to be some blue wave i do think that trump fatigue is going to be enough to pick up a little on the democratic side but as far as framing a message and framing policy positions and framing what is in actual opposition the democratic establishment has not done that they largely have not done that. so when you don't really have a real opposition in our politics which i would say at the establishment level we really don't have. you know you just kind of have. the nonst

, the incumbent senator is disavowing the democratic party. watch this. >> i would say this, i would noa call my colleagues crazy, but elizabeth warren sure went after me when i advocated tooling back some of the regulations for small banks and credit unions. i certainly disagree with bernie sanders on a bunch of stuff. >> tucker: for the record, there is literally no difference between elizabeth and warren and claire mccaskill, but whatever. lisa boothe has been on these campaigns for us for a while now and doing a great job. i sense a theme here. let's start with the mccaskill clip that we just played were some democrats in some states are pretending to be much more moderate than their voting records suggest they really are. >> claire mccaskill has said that elizabeth warren is one oft those crazy democrats, yet she>> has voted with her 60% of the time and she has voted with senator chuck schumer 80% of the time entries only voted with president trump 45% of the time but guess what, she's trying to show that she is chummy with president trum

>> well, it makes me wonder if there is room for moderate democrats in the democratic party nowadays. there were some elected officials who said that they acknowledge that they've known me and i am not a racist. however, it was insensitive. and unfortunately, if my patriotism and standing up for family friends has become insensitive, then i think we as democrats need to stop and reevaluate exactly what we stand for. >> tucker: if standing up for the flag is considered racist, then what happens to the country do you think going forward? >> that's a good question. i'm a little worried about that. >> tucker: what are you going to do? >> well, i would like to continue to bring this to light and continue to voice concern for this very issue. and then in the short term, ironically, my son is going in the air force in 60 days so i'm going to spend some time with him, and then i will continue to fight this because as long as i can and continue to clear my name. >> tucker: god bless. and let me just say, again, i'm not a supporter of the democratic party, but i hope you stay in that party beca

, the democratic party, fought for this nomination? obviously this was a very closely fought nomination. senator manchin crossed over, appears to be a yes vote tomorrow as well as a yes vote for cloture today. other than that, all democrats held together against this nomination. there was a very fierce fight in the judiciary committee every step of the way over this nomination. democrats i think went as hard as they could against this nomination. it does not seem to have been successful in the end. are there other things that you think democrats could have done or should have done better? was this a winnable fight? >> well, it's hard to win when you're not in the majority. and that's why elections matter. i will tell you what was so inspiring to me is my daughter was 8 years old with me back in 1991 watching clarence thomas/anita hill hearings. and today she is a mother with two young daughters. and she sent me a text during the first hearings and said to me, mom, look at the democratic side. unlike when you and i were watching it many

chess and democratic parties also have to change because what it has done so far hasn't kept a lot of it's also held. men and women in power when it needs also highlight more diverse voices and how it onto a status quo that's not going to cut it anymore because it doesn't include enough. or we begin the day that around the world is being referred to as the day after her announcement it has been twenty four hours since german chancellor angela merkel told the country she will not seek reelection at the end of her term in two thousand and twenty one three more years before she exits the political stage it only took a few hours for several would be medical replacements to throw their names into the ring and there is already a clear favorite according to a new spiegel online poll more germans would like to see friedrich merits take over from miracle as head of the conservative c.d.u. party later this year now the job of party leader usually goes hand in hand with becoming chancellor but before he left politics merits was considered america's loudest rival within the conservative party cou

>> well, it makes me wonder if there is room for moderate democrats in the democratic party nowadays. there were some elected officials who said that they acknowledge that they've known me and i am not a racist. however, it was insensitive. and unfortunately, if my patriotism and standing up for family friends has. become insensitive, then i think we as democrats need to stop and reevaluate exactly what we stand for. >> tucker: if standing up for the flag is considered racist, then what happens to the country, do you think,p going forward? >> that's a good question. i'm a little worried about that. >> tucker: what are you going to do? >> well, i would like to continue to bring this to light and continue to voice concern for this very issue. and then in the short term, ironically, my son is going in the air force in 60 days, so i'm going to spend some time with him, and then i will continue to fight this cause as long as i can and continue to clear my name. >> tucker: god bless. and let me just say, again, i'm not a supporter of the democratic party. but i hope you stay in that party b

that's what this new democratic party is a part. >> lou: this new democratic party that he has much to do with transforming. holder tweeted in part well, i'm obviously not advocating violence. i'm saying republicans are undermining our democracy and democrats need to be tough, proud and stand up for the values we believe in. what values does he believe in? he's the only sitting cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of congress. it's quickly becoming a party of hate fake outrage. what are those democratic values he's talking about? we have been told by trysail presidential candidate, hillary clinton that it is not civility. >> you cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. if we are fortunate enough to win back the house and or the senate, that is when civility can start again. >> a price for civility. the price tag is high. all hillary clinton wants his control of the government. her recommended lack of civility has been seen over the past two weeks. radical leftist client at the doors of the supreme court to try to assaul

party and precisely because they are the backbone of the democratic party we should never take them for granted and we have. shannon: this is what he said in july, african-americans in particular generally are the backbone of the party because they are. we should never take them for granted. in the past we have. i want to apologize for this. any better in engaging? >> they are doing better engaging. in the race we are talking about, i spent two weeks in missouri and st. louis in the ferguson crisis and there was lack of engagement and the municipal government is failing because there was not something we had time to get into but as you see the party trying to engage african-american voters, by running african-american candidates and by listening to african american voters in a transformative way and have them be part of the process. we saw that in the dow jones race where they took the race over-the-top for doug jones and in florida where gillam is leading because african american voters took him over the edge of the primary they will take more in the general election. shannon: how

why do you think the democratic party explicitly attacks people from towns like yours? >> i think that we have become in their minds the deplorable's. that wasn't just a slip of the tongue by hillary clinton. the people who cling to our guns and our god and that's a bad thing. famous words spoken by president obama. so for whatever reason we have become expendable and i think part of that is because we don't have the numbers that you will find in more urban areas that can bring boats and so our interests aren't of interest and that's frankly the bottom line. it's a political calculus that we are not as important as we once used to be, which by the y will end end up hurting us big time. >> tucker: certainly it will. a despised minority group under attack by politicians. rural america. pretty disgusting. he put it so nicely. great to see you. our show is over. we are sad about that but we will be back again tomorrow night at 8:00 p.m. this war that is the sworn enemy -- all in great abundance right now. this won't last forever. good night from washington. guess who's next

it's a moment i don't see sold many different directions with and yes in the christian democratic party i think they're still in the beginning of the process also looking for success or not because names have been dropped but i don't think these and their names which has been dropped and it's a moment are a real choice for what this huge or similar thing to on some similar development is going on in the social democratic party has so i mean on the what we are. heading for is a kind also weakened government and this move create much more distrust and do not judge confidence in the billion government among the german population and especially our next particular time when the whole of europe is in turmoil and of this is a very dangerous. situation we're in that's a moment where medical survived many political ups and downs they've had nineteen years a cd leader and thirteen years of chancellor as well but in many way she's still popular but will the attention now change and move to who the succession successor is or what the succession plan will be. and that the search is on the definitel

the democratic party was no longer the party of tip o'neill. they gave that up and they are more interested in other things that had nothing to do with ordinary concerns of ordinary americans. it was for private unions. the message was clear on their side o the public sector is something else. it was deeply a branch of the democratic party taking on issues that has nothing much to do with the concerns of ordinary workers. >> host: william, your thought? >> guest: the republican party has changed a little bit. now it's here for billionaires and what gets me mad is cool was a dead industry going to solar and nuclear and electric and we are just wasting our time putting ourselves in a draconian era. trump is fiddling and the east of the mississippi is apocalyptic proportions. to me he is dick cheney on steroids. >> guest: you've identified a whole bunch of issues that i described van delete democratic party and what iat said was we e not going to put all of our money onth things like climate changein but on things like getting our jobs back. >> ho

there's no more moderates in the democratic party. it's a party now of smearing, slanders, lies, for searching besmirch meant, character assassination, carrot up down my character bludgeoning with the laughable sad double standard. don't forget about the deputy chair of this party, the dnc, keith ellison. he's facing abuse allegations leveled by his ex-girlfriend, karen monahan, who had supportively produced radical atomic medical records, therapist notes, text messages and apparently she has recordings as well, but the left doesn't believe her. they are not standing by her side. if neither to the lawyer who cleared ellison in the report to the state democratic party of minnesota, a law firm donated 500 grand to the democrats. now the police are looking into it tonight. senator cory booker, a.k.a. spartacus, 1992. look at what he wrote in his own high school groping escapades while the senate democrats demanded an fbi investigation into kavanaugh's high school years, what about his misconduct? now we have also tonight beto o'rourke, t

why democrats are not going out to vote is the democratic party are left liberal alone. you don't do anything particularly with immigration. we have a lot of people sitting, you know, [indiscernible] in new york who cannot work or having problem meeting their family. don't have no way around. you live up to what you present. the people. you do not do anything for us. why are we going to leave our jobs, lose money and go vote for us when you are not there for us? you are only for one party. you don't talk about anymore who we are. represent us. you know, when i talk about, i talk about example. pedro: ok. gotcha. gotcha. when it comes to those democrats in new york, per se what is the , breakdown for someone who identifies themselves a moderate democrat versus a progressive democrat? jeanne: this is something i find identifies our state today and increasingly the country when you mentioned the democratic already. we mentioned our incumbent governor who is running for his third term, andrew cuomo, usually defined as a moderate democrat who faced the primary challenge from

it is called the democrat party. i watch what they say -- the democratic party. in many cases, those are the people who want to make it look as good as possible. it is the democrat party which does not read well. the other reads better. we will call it the democrat party, and it is openly inviting millions of illegal aliens to break our laws, violate our borders, and overwhelm our nation. [booing] pres. trump: the democrats want caravans and like them. a lot of people say, "i wonder who started them?" mexico has been so incredible. the leaders of mexico, thank you. do you know why? mexico now respects the leadership of the united states. thank you, mexico, and we appreciate it. what they want -- and by the way, we started the wall and it is moving along. i want to build it rapidly. i can do it in a year. we did $1.6 billion. we have another 1.6 billion and it sounds like a lot, when you are going for a thousand miles. the wall is moving. i want to approve the wall. [cheering] pres. trump: the democrats do not care about what the extremist agenda will do to your h

that is what this new democratic party is about. >> lou: this new democratic party that he had much to do with, well, transforming. holder tweeting in part tonight. "i'm obviously not advocating violence. i'm saying republicans are undermining our democracy and the democrats need to be tough, proud and stand up for the values we believe in." what values does he believe in? he is the only sitting cabinet member ever to have been held in contempt of congress. someone who represents what is becoming quickly a party of hate and fake outrage. so what are the democratic values that he is talking about? we have already been told by twice failed presidential candidate hillary clinton that it's not civility. >> you cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. if we are fortunate enough to win back the house and/or the senate, that is when civility can start again. >> lou: a price for civility. the price tag is high. all hillary clinton wants is well, control of the government. her recommended look of civility has already been seen in the

in 2010 come all the way up to 2016, the democrat party has lost 1200 seats. national, state, local. you have to count all the way down to the dog catcher, they have lost. they have the least amount of electoral political power in washington since the '20s. where is this blue wave? where's the evidence that people can't wait to vote democrat? the evidence as they are are doing the exact opposite. trump is out there continuing to do the things he did that won him the election in 2016, all of these rallies. they have been unable to get rid of him. they have thrown everything at us before that usually gets rid of republican opponents, and nothing has worked. and they're just frustrated as they can be, and i think they are so overplaying this, and they are going way beyond the bounds of anywhere near propriety. what they think, most americans want to be encouraged to do mob-like behavior, getting people's faces. i don't think pete we have lost the country to that extent that that wins elections. >> sean: how big an impact -- ohr to me a tipping point. i think most

democrat party. i watch where they say the democratic party. usually, in many cases, those are people that want to make it look as good as possible but it is, it's the democrat party, which doesn't read well. the other reads better. but we're going to call it the democrat party and it's openly inviting millions of illegal aliens to break our laws, violate our borders. >> not even sure really where to start with that. president trump says of course, that he shouldn't shoulder the blame if republicans lose control of the house. and an interesting poll to show you chuck todd flagged of people that don't like either political party. 59% say they will vote for democrats compared to 17% for republicans up 16 points since last month. so i'm going to get joe and phil in on this conversation, too. congressman, i want to allow you to respond to the president and what he said about the democratic party of which you are a member. >> it's the democratic party and newt gingrich started rebranding us as the democra

chess and democratic parties also have to change because what it has done so far hasn't kept a lot of it's also held. men and women in power when it's also highlight more diverse voices and how than to have status quo that's not going to cut it anymore because it doesn't include enough people. or we begin the day that around the world is being referred to as the day after her announcement it has been twenty four hours since german chancellor and america told the country she will not seek reelection at the end of her term in two thousand and twenty one three more years before she exits the political stage it only took a few hours for several would be miracle replacements to throw their names into the ring and there is already a clear favorite according to a new spiegel online poll more germans would like to see friedrich mir take over from miracle as head of the conservative c.d.u. party later this year now the job of party leader usually goes hand in hand with becoming chancellor but before he left politics merits was considered until america was loudest rival within the conservative

democratic parties also have to change because what it has done so far hasn't kept a lot of it's also held. men and women in power when it's also highlighted more diverse voices and how it onto its status but that's not going to cut it anymore because it doesn't include enough. or we begin the day that around the world is being referred to as the date after her announcement it has been twenty four hours since german chancellor angela merkel told the country she will not seek reelection at the end of her term in two thousand and twenty one three more years before she exits the political stage it only took a few hours for several would be merkel replacements to throw their names into the ring and there is already a clear favorite according to a new spiegel online poll more germans would like to see friedrich mir take over from miracle as head of the conservative c.d.u. party later this year now the job of party leader usually goes hand in hand with becoming chancellor but before he left politics merits was considered miracles loudest rival within the conservative party could his return

and then democratic strategist donna brazil on how the democratic party is trying to appeal to female voters in campaign 2018. and liz mayer tries to talk about the republican parties's ef -- party's effort to attract female voters. join the discussion on tuesday morning. >> caroline shapiro is the co-director on the supreme court of college law and joining us on a historical perspective on supreme court nominations. you wrote about the hearing process, but if you applied it to the confirmation process overall, you said it is -- it is exciting and part disappointment. what did you mean by that? >> in part it is aspect cal. it is exciting to hear this person who may become a supreme court, get a sense of who they are in terms of their public personality and intelligence. i think that is regardless of who the nominating president is. it is frustrating because the nominees don't tell us things that people really want to know. >> has that been a constant theme of those appearing for -- ap peering before the -- appearing before the senate or is that a more recent thing? to some extent the

, the democratic party, fought for this nomination? obviously this was a very closely fought nomination. senator manchin crossed over, appears to be a yes vote tomorrow as well as a yes vote for cloture today. other than that, all democrats held together against this nomination. there was a very fierce fight in the judiciary committee every step of the way over this nomination. democrats i think went as hard as they could against this nomination. it does not seem to have been successful in the end. are there other things that you think democrats could have done or should have done better? was this a winnable fight? >> well, it's hard to win when you're not in the majority. and that's why elections matter. i will tell you what was so inspiring to me is my daughter was 8 years old with me back in 1991 watching clarence thomas/anita hill hearings. and today she is a mother with two young daughters. and she sent me a text during the first hearings and said to me, mom, look at the democratic side. unlike when you and i were watching it many

in 2010 come all the way up to 2016, the democrat party has lost 1200 seats. national, state, local. you have to count all the way down to the dog catcher, they have lost. they have the least amount of electoral political power in washington since the '20s. where is this blue wave? where's the evidence that people can't wait to vote democrat? the evidence as they are are doing the exact opposite. trump is out there continuing to do the things he did that won him the election in 2016, all of these rallies. they have been unable to get rid of him. they have thrown everything at us before that usually gets rid of republican opponents, and nothing has worked. and they're just frustrated as they can be, and i think they are so overplaying this, and they are going way beyond the bounds of anywhere near propriety. what they think, most americans want to be encouraged to do mob-like behavior, getting people's faces. i don't think pete we have lost the country to that extent that that wins elections. >> sean: how big an impact -- ohr to me a tipping point. i think most

trish: one of the problems in 2016 for the democratic party. hillary clinton i know you like her a lot. but she wasn't warm and fuzzy and she didn't go to the states she needed to go to and she didn't connect with people. do they run the risk of putting forward somebody who doesn't connect with your average voter? >> i think that's a risk for any political party jockying amongst a lot of people who want to be running in 2020. elizabeth warren was never my choice for a candidate, i think she is too far left. that's something we have to contend with in our party. she does have a number of professors she worked with at harvard law school and elsewhere who said she did not get hired because of her native american heritage. but she comes from a poor family in oklahoma you would usually think is republican based. but it's a liberal family. she advocated tirelessly for the poor. trish: but she is increasingly left left left and that's a problem. >> they are making a stampede to the far left because they don't want to alienate the base. do we have time

the democratic party has struggled with that. to have a clear seat at the table for everyone is something give-- some people have to up room. that has been a struggle in the democratic party. have permanent interests. vehiclearty presents a to carry those interests, that is where we will be. that i can assure you if that interest is not carried by one or both of the parties, we will seek out another way to make sure there is inclusion at the table. is there a way to reach out about these issues and how they should be manifested? guest: we are talking to both parties about our interests. there are some republicans who agree with us on criminal justice reform. we communicate openly with them. democrats talk about access to quality education. we are agnostic to who we talked to to advance our interests. that goes across the aisle. host: from the republican line, steve is in new jersey. caller: how are you? i would like to address the issue of a formative -- affirmative action as it applies to the selection process in universities, e

she and he rejuvenated the democratic party in wisconsin. there had been no democratic party to speak up for 20 years in the 1950's when they and a handful of others brought it back to life. >> the democratic party did not exist in wisconsin. there was the progressive party and the republican party. there was a small group of men, including warren, carl thompson, who began the murmurs of a political unit that would oppose or be different from the progressive movement and republican party. he ran three times for governor and lost all three times, so we thought the career was over. we had no plans ever to run again for anything. and then fortuitously, mccarthy died in the spring of 57. people started calling bill saying you have to run, you are the best-known democrat. >> she talks in the second interview about how she found in his top dresser drawer near the end of his career a pamphlet he picked up about alzheimer's disease and recognizing the symptoms in oneself. >> in 1988, nobody talked about alzheimer's. nobody knew what it was. some yea

over hillary clinton in two thousand and sixteen now many are asking what does the democratic party stand for other than standing against the will draw. if there is a blue wave coming to washington it might look something like this during brett kavanaugh confirmation hearings for the u.s. supreme court angry activists of all genders and colors turned up to protest in numbers this is a key strategy the democrats have been banking on make people show up and party leaders are pushing the message that to restore democrats to office people especially women need to vote well just let women know in america that their voices do matter that their vote the votes matter and that what they do with their time between now and november absolutely matters is how do you think the democrats are going to do in the midterms they often have i think they will with. many democrats agree with gillibrand assessment they think voters are motivated and of just enough show up the democrats will have an easy victory. people are really fired people are angry and people are going to vote i do hope so i think that

the green party is a party firmly anchored in the democratic spectrum it is a party of liberal democratic values it has a lot of very forward looking policies voters in bavaria voters in hasn't said they like where that party is going. and where it could take their states and presumably germany as well so one thing that we may be seeing in all of this current disorder or in the shifting political landscape is the rise of a party that can become a serious contender on the national level in a potential future coalition possibly with a newly reformed christian democratic party the chancellor's party under new leadership that would be a coalition that many people in this country find very interesting in terms of putting in place a politics that is both oriented to the needs of citizens and voters but also possibly with real new wind in terms of how to get the german economy ready for the future whether it's in the area of digitalisation investment energy policy that is truly sustainable all of that could be a strength of such a new party with the greens in place so there's some very good news

should you splinter the democratic party overall? no. i think it is a disastrous idea and will help the right-wing win. >> are you saying you don't pick it should happen, but you are talking about civil war. cenk: no, i think there will be healthy and sometimes not healthy fight over ideas. we're not going to bow our heads. when they say let's take donor money and keep spending for defense contractors from our answer is no, hard no. what you want to do? this is democracy, so we debate. you leave then party. if anyone should leave the party, it should be them, not us. if they want to join the republicans and celebrate donors, they are welcome to it. >> are you supporting bernie sanders for 2020? cenk: so, i supported bernie sanders in 2016 based on the field. the field is not set yet, so no, right now i have an open mind and i want to see who the candidates are and what their positions are going to be. >> who are candidates emerging you see besides bernie sanders and elizabeth warren? cenk: almost obviously cory booker will run. obviously

>> disrespect of the democratic party has for african-americans into new phenomena. by way of the candidates we see locally. let's talk about what's going on in illinois right now. a candidate running for governor in illinois who has democratic staff that african-americans are suing informational discrimination. this is happening all across. i thought we were going to have a real bipartisan conversation on this. we know the democrats simply aren't doing enough to recruit. on the other end, republicans are doing enough either but it looks a little different. look at the 2016 race. african-americans and hispanics running for president. who do we have on the other side running on the democratic side? >> i guess you could say that argument. let's be real. you had president donald trump so yesterday he accused democratic candidate for governor of florida -- he called him a thief with absolutely no evidence. >> shannon: he's referring to the fbi investigation in which it has been revealed that there were broadway tickets that were very expensive to hamilton, i have not see

our fed -- our organization works with both parties and leadership in the state, democratic party that are unhappy with the politicians both in minneapolis and in st. paul. jillian: lieutenant kroll thank you for your time, appreciate it. >> thanks for having me. rob: 35 minutes after the hour, the left calling on supporters to kick republicans. >> michelle says when they go low, we go high. no, no. [laughter] >> they go low, we kick them. rob: that's from former attorney general, from socialist to violent riots and the call for open borders is this new democratic party really the way to win in the midterms, we will debate that coming up next why bother mastering something? because when you want to create an entirely new feeling, the difference between excellence and mastery, is all the difference in the world. introducing the all-new lexus es. a product of mastery. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. . . . no matter how much you clean, does your house still smell stuffy? that's because your home is filled with soft surfaces that trap odors and release them back into the room. so,

the democratic party also fired the chair of the national party, right? chaos in the party. those leaks were specifically designed and curated to stoke maximum dissent among different factions of democrats so the convention wouldn't unify them and wouldn't bring them together to mount a single effort for the election. republicans of course were ecstatic about it. they loved it. and soon republican candidate donald trump was calling on national television for russian hackers to please hack and steal hillary clinton's personal e-mails as well. we found out later in an indictment from robert mueller and the special counsel's office that in fact russian military intelligence officers tried to do just that the very day that donald trump asked them to do it. by the following month, by august, august 15th, we now know the fbi was investigating not only what russia was trying to do to intrude in our election, but also whether the russians might have any american confederates who were trying to help them. by august 15th, the homeland security secretary jay johnson convened a conferen

what does the democratic party stand for today? >> kevin, what is the message for democrats? >> well, exactly. i think that's the question as we head into the midterm elections and as we head into the 2020 cycle. it's never too early to talk presidential politics. i can't wait to get back on the presidential campaign trail. for vice president joe biden, he's someone trying to go after the union voters. he's trying to specifically target their 70,000 voters that were the swing vote in michigan, ohio, wisconsin, pennsylvania. the trump coalition was able to carry. senator bernie sanders was in michigan and on the midterm campaign trail campaigning with debbie steb now. he thanked the crowd for their upset victory in the hillary clinton primary. look, the democrats, after the midterms, i would anticipate there's going to be a bevy of early jockeying, early positioning. it's already going on, by the way, at the staff level with camilla harris and elizabeth warren. has been for quite some time, as well as vice president joe biden. >> i totally agree with what john allen just said.

there are virtually no moderates left in the democratic party. john podesta's group advised congressional hopefuls don't talk about immigration, don't do it. meanwhile party leaders are making democrats not to talk about plans to impeach the president. some like maxine waters, she is admitting they are telling her not to talk about it but she can't help yourself. take a look. >> i'm in this fight. i'm in this fight and i'm not going to move. as you know, there's a difference with how some of our leadership talks about how we should handle all of this. they say please don't say impeachment anymore. when they said that i say impeachment, impeachment, impeachment. [laughter] [applause] >> sean: don't talk about impeachment even though we really agree with that, don't talk about immigration even though we want open borders eliminating ice. light of the american people, that's their strategy. many other prominent democrats are busy demonizing political differences with what is now a hyperpartisan divisive atmosphere with divisive rhetoric including se

angst chess and democratic parties also have to change because what it has done so far hasn't kept a lot of it's also held. men and women in power when it meets also highlight more diverse voices and how it onto its status but that's not going to cut it anymore because it doesn't include enough people. or we begin the day that around the world is being referred to as the date after her announcement it has been twenty four hours since german chancellor angela merkel told the country she will not seek reelection at the end of her term in two thousand and twenty one three more years before she exits the political stage will it only took a few hours for several would be miracle replacements to throw their names into the ring and there is already a clear favorite according to a new spiegel online poll more germans would like to see friedrich mir take over from miracle as head of the conservative c.d.u. party later this year now the job of party leader usually goes hand in hand with becoming chancellor but before he left politics merits was considered until america was loudest rival within

the democratic party has been attracting more women than men. when it comes to the central valley -- and if we want to even talk more generally about the political geography of takeornia, you can almost the state and draw a line down the middle. the coast goes blue. the coast goes pretty democratic most of the time. is whered counties republicans have gathered and lived and settled. the inner part of the state tends to be read. but even in parts of the state where you do have latino/ hispanic majority or coming up on a plurality, those are places where you either have people at who are able to appeal to those constituents either because of a kind of name recognition, or because they do actually make appeals in the way that they take policy stances. for example, you have people like jeff denham, who is in a district where he's been able to say i support dreamers. if that is the only method you here as a voter, you might say that is actually something that i support as well. now, the entire voting record of the republicans clearly are not democrat

the democratic party also fired the chair of the national party, right? chaos in the party. those leaks were specifically designed and curated to stoke maximum discontent among different factions of democrats. so that convention wouldn't unify them or bring them together to mount a single effort for the election. desired effect achieved. republicans of course were ecstatic about it. they loved it. and soon republican candidate donald trump was calling on national television for russian hackers to please hack and steal hillary clinton's personal e-mails as well. we found out later in an indictment from robert mueller and the special counsel's office that in fact russian military intelligence officers tried to do just that the very day that donald trump asked them to do it. by the following month, by august, august 15th, we now know the fbi was investigating not only what russia was trying to do to intrude in our election, but also whether the russians might have any american confederates who were trying to help them. by august 15th, the homeland security secretary jeh johnson

, the democratic party fought for this nomination? obviously this was a very closely fought nomination. senator manchin crossed over, appears to be a yes vote tomorrow as well as yes vote for cloture today. other than that, all democrats held together against this nomination there was a very fierce fight in the judiciary committee every step of the way over this nomination. democrats i think went as hard as they could against this nomination. it does not seem to have been successful in the end. are there other things that you think democrats could have done or should have done better? was this a winnable fight? >> well, it's hard to win when you're not in the majority. and that's why elections matter. i will tell you what was so inspiring to me is my daughter was 8 years old with me back in 1991 watching clarence thomas/anita hill hearing. and today she is a mother with two young daughters. and she sent me a text during the first hearing and said to me, mom, look at the democratic side. unlike when you and i were watching it many year