was at andrew weissmann and his staff? >> sean: the words that came out of his mouth were dumb. you have to blame the guy who spoke them. reading from a prompter or some paper, but we'll get to the bottom of it. >> it's a big conspiracy, sean.e believe you me. >> sean: thank you, sir. joining us now, house intelligence committee t republican congressman devin nunes. it is now inevitable, congressman.n. it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when. we have talked about five separate buckets. we talked about the fisa applications, 303s, exculpatory evidence, more. now the president the classifieds, the game changer, the ig report, and mr. durham, and john huber, and the attorney general. tell us what you see unfolding and when. >> i want to start to make sure what mueller did yesterday, i thought you did a pretty good job but people forget one important point. mueller tried to do this a victory lap.t he tried to talk about the russians they found, the russians they prosecuted.. i want to remind people that the house republicans on the intelligence committee had that over a year

andrew weissmann at the victory party. the pit bull, the atrocious record. jeannie rhee, he could not find one republican donor, not one? >> what struck me today is that 's peddling two stories. he tells the american people that he could not bring an obstruction case against the president because of an office of legal counsel opinion -- which by the way, the advisory is not mandatory -- and he told william barr, the attorney general, not once, not twice, but three times, something completely different. >> sean: by the way, there were witnesses to this. >> he said the opinion had nothing whatsoever to do with my nondecision decision.o so who's telling the truth here? 's core argument, this man's core argument that you see on the screen is, we cannot approve the president did not commit obstruction of justice. think about what that means. that is a double negative. he is reversing the burden of proof and inverting the presumption of innocence. prosecutors are not of the business of exonerating people. he is tainting and smearing the president and forcing them

it is andrew weissmann who wrote that letter. and that was a legacy letter and designed to cover their tuitions because don't like the reaction of their report which was a sophomoric, adolescent 400 pages of very, poorly written legal work. it is kind of first year law school writing. in my opinion. now kamala harris, she is running for president. she does what she does. she is snooty and she did her little thing. and i think i'm a quite frankly, they have embarrassed themselves and embarrassing the united states senate. and kamala harris with mazie hirono and you have the monsters and quite remarkable. >> laura: shawn dimmick john, you, the idea of someone with experience, the wealth of legal knowledge, the gravitas all those words apply to bill barr. you know him, we've all known him i guess on this panel have known him for a couple of decades, all of us, but the idea of these people one after the other trying to destroy a man entire legacy based on bob mueller's team being upset about the tone as saul said and not being fleshe

it is andrew weissmann who wrote that letter. and that was a legacy letter and designed to cover their tuitions because don't like the reaction of their report which was a sophomoric, adolescent 400 pages of very, poorly written legal work. it is kind of first year law school writing. in my opinion. now kamala harris, she is running for president. she does what she does. she is snooty and she did her little thing. and i think i'm a quite frankly they have embarrassed themselves and embarrassing the united states senate. and kamala harris with mazie hirono and you have the monsters and quite remarkable.it >> laura: john, you, the idea of someone with experience, the wealth of legal knowledge, the gravitas all those words apply to bill barr. you know him, we've all known him i guess on this panel have known him for a couple of decades, all of us, but the idea of these people one after the other trying to destroy a man's entire legacy based on bob mueller's team being upset about the tone as sol said and not being flushed out in a b

why would he ever give so much power to andrew weissmann, hyper partisan, hillary-loving hack, at hillary's victory party with an atrocious protectional track record. when did he realize russia collusion never happened? when did he learn about hillary's bought and paid for russian dossier. and by the way, to impact the race, that's important. mueller needs on answer, if he had time to investigate taxi medallions, decades old tax returns, bank fraud on loan applications, perjury, he didn't have time on look into real evidence of collusion? because it featured hillary, the heart of his so-called mandate? and christopher steele, multiple foreign governments no, time for that either. by the way, i have bad news for the democrats, look at this poll, most americans, they are not interested in mueller appearing before congress. they got it. they read it. it's over. you just don't recognize a simple truth. the mitch hunt is done. the only thing -- the witch hunt is done. the second act that, curtain goes up, but you have it rad cam base of the democratic party calling for impeachment long into trum

why would he ever give so much power to andrew weissmann,? hyper-partisan, hillary-loving hack, at hillary's victory party with an atrocious professional track record. when did he realize russia collusion never happened? when did he learn about hillary's bought-and-paid-for russian dossier. and by the way, to impact the race, that's important. mueller needs to answer, if he had time to investigate taxi medallions, decades-old tax returns, bank fraud on loan applications, perjury, he didn't have time on look into real evidence of collusion? because it featured hillary, the heart of his so-called mandate? and, of course, christopher steele, multiple foreign governments, no time for that, either. by the way, i have bad news for the democrats: look at this poll. most americans, they are not interested in mueller appearing before congress. they got it. they read it. it's over. you just don't recognize t a a simple truth. the witch hunt is done. the only thing left now, yes, the second act. that curtain goes up. but you will have the radical base o

bruce ohr, andrew weissmann, and other people who worked on the former dossier team come up they are looking at this very salacious and unverified information and not one of them sits there and says, where does this come from, bruce ohr? where did this come from? oh, my wife is doing it. my wife is working for fusion dps working for the democrats and clinton campaign. that was a whole thing. it's so serious but you want to laugh. but at the same time you hope that justice is actually served for these criminals. >> sean: if you listen to the attorney general when he went before senator graham's committee, is he interested wanting to get to the bottom of the fisa abuse? we know that bruce ohr behind closed doors testified, he warned everybody that hillary paid for it, steele hates trump. ten days before, a state department official catherine before comey signed off, says verified but an unverifiable document, but steele doesn't stand by his own words. are those people going to be held accountable? do you see any way they get out of what i would think is an indictment to commit fraud an

after all, the same andrew weissmann, he was attending hillary clinton's election night party that never happened. but the same partisan hack who donated thousands of dollars to democrats. the same guy, according to sidney powell's book, "license to lie," known forr withholding exculpatory evidence, tens of thousands of jobs were loste at andersen accounting because of his wrongful prosecution in the case. remember that case was overturned 9-0. why did mueller hire this guy in the u.s. supreme court? thn't forget, he is the guy who put four merrill executives in jail for a year. that case was overturned by the fifth circuit. one year of four people's lives ruined. yet bob mueller appointed him to be the most powerful person in this entire witch-hunt investigation which at the end of the day, frankly, in retrospect, gives so much more weight to the fact that they found nothing. now make no mistake, mueller's hyperpartisan team of investigators, they were hell bent on taking down a duly elected president of the united states. they were no different than many other high ranking unelected go

why did you have hired a man named andrew weissmann, your pit bull according to "the new york times" who has nothing but a long track record? license to lie, sidney powell, withholding exculpatory evidence, of losing tens of thousands of americans jobs in the enron case. it being beaten down 9-0 in the u.s. supreme court, putting for merrill executives in jail for a year and that was overturned by the fifth circuit. how did you hire that guy? by the way, he also attended hillary clinton's victory party on election night 2016. not one republican donor. by the way, a hillary clinton super fan investigating her political rival. why didn't mueller hire any republican donors? when did he determine there was no collusion? i'd like that question answered. why was he more interested in fair and taxi medallions and loan application than he was about a dirty brush an dossier russian disinformation that i opposition party candidate paid for and then was used to spy on the opposition party? that, people you hired said should win 100000000-0 that trump was loathsome. and they had an insurance pol

why did he appoint andrew weissmann and a band of democrats? let's see, people that withheld exculpatory evidence in the past and people that represented hillary clinton. nobody that donated to republicans. i like a few of those questions. why did robert mueller not touch hillary clinton's bought and paid for dirty russian dossier? i know he was busy. he was looking into violations. the bad loan applications. incomplete tax returns, taxi medallions. too busy to investigate hillary's bought and paid for russian lies and propaganda to impact the 2016 election, which was part of the mandate of what he was supposed to be doing, not taxi medallions or violations. watch this. >> should we take the president's tweet from this past week and as order to bill barr to not allow robert mueller to testify? >> i think that's a determination to be made at this point. that's the president's feeling on the matter and the reason is because we consider this as a case closed, as a finished process and again, i think most americans think that this is finished. >> s

that is what my entire book is about and how the government particularly, andrew weissmann and he was mueller's pit bull and running this entire special counsel investigation left to hide, exculpatory evidence and sent the missing people to prison. we will find a lot of violations of the brady rule in the conduc conduct. >> dan: one quick follow-up. this gang of eight briefing that brennan gives in august, he has on tape saying he hasn't seen the dossier till december. if that is declassified in that game, how much trouble is he in? >> he ought to be in trouble never the less, whatever comes out because we know he was pushing this dossier purposefully by linking it to congress outside of the gang of eight briefing with harry reid who then, unsurprisingly essentially leaked it through public letters back to the obama administration. just quickly, these are primary documents that need to be released and we can't trust mueller to characterize them correctly. that is why the attorney general should release that actually should determine for ourselves what mueller is telling us. >> dan: th

even the guy that was at hillary's victory party, mueller's pitbull, andrew weissmann, , and atrocious track record, and of course that included the hillary clinton attorney as it relates to the clinton foundation. take a look. >> the letter is a bit snooty and i think it was written by one of the staff people. >> did you make a written memorandum of your conversation? did you make a memorandum or anyone else? did anyone, either you or anyone on your staff, memorialize your conversation with robert mueller? >> yes. >> who did that? >> there were notes taken. >> may we have those notes? >> no. >> sean: no. [laughs] you have got to love that. let's take a moment to lay out the facts one more time. well, some people just need to know where this is going. we are trying to educate them. and it is hard. they are so entrenched in their own conspiracy theories, lies in their own mind, i think they actually believe their lies at this point. zero evidence that anyone in the trump campaign colluded with russia. mueller did not make a determination on obstruction. the attorney general indicated th

that is what my entire book is about and how the government particularly, andrew weissmann and he was mueller's pit bull in running this entire special counsel investigation loved to hide, exculpatory evidence and sent the missing people to prison. we will find a lot of violations of the brady rule in the conduct. >> dan: one quick follow-up. this gang of eight briefing that brennan gives in august, he has on tape saying he hasn't seen the dossier till december. if that is declassified in that game, how much trouble is he in? >> he ought to be in trouble never the less, whatever comes out because we know he was pushingg this dossier purposefully by linking it to congress outside of the gang of eight briefing with harry b reid who then, unsurprisingly, essentially leaked it through public letters back to the obama administration. just quickly, these are primary documents that need to be released and we can't trust mueller to characterize them correctly. that is why the attorney general should release that so we can actually determine for ourselves what mueller is telling us. >> dan: th

that's right, the andrew weissman, of all people. now we know why mueller's team was filled with, oh, far left clinton allies, zero republican donors. after all, the same

why did he hire andrew weissmann, licensed to lie, in sidney powell's book, he once withheld exculpatory evidence, most atrocious record, enron accounting and merrill executives, 9-0 he lost in the supreme court? would you like the answer to ?those questions? because i would. >> yeah, i would ask them, did you find any collusion between the trump campaign and russia? did president trump do anything to stop you from doing your job, is what i would ask him. the answer is no, trump did not collude with the russians.no we know for sure he didn't. we now know that trump gave 1.4 million documents to the special counsel. everybody around the president testified for hours.ts the bottom line is the democrats want an outcome, the mueller report did not give them the outcome they wanted. they'rehe going to keep going until they get the outcome they want. and here's what is going to happen. if the president focuses on infrastructure, keeping the country safe, he is going to win. nancy pelosi and that crowd is going to get kicked out of office. >> sean: is there a justifiable reason withfi that broa

why did he hire andrew weissmann, licensed to lie, in sidney powell's book, he wants withheld exculpatory evidence, most atrocious record, nonzero he lost in the supreme court? would you like the answer to those questions? because i would peer at >> if you find collusion between the trump campaign and russia, did president trump do anything to b is what i would ask him. the answer is no, trump did not collude with russia. we know for sure he didn't. we now know that trump gave 1.4 million documents to the special counsel. everybody around the president testified four hours. the bottom line is the democrats want an outcome, the mueller report did not give them the outcome they wanted. they're going to keep going until they get the outcome they want. and here's what is going to happen. if the president focuses on infrastructure, keeping the country safe, he is going to win. nancy pelosi in that crowd is going to get kicked out of office. >> sean: is there a justifiable reason without broad mandate that mueller had? it wasn't broad, took him way off course. how does he then justify the main

. >> andrew weissmann-- he has a reputation for being a scorched-earth prosecutor. >> mueller put greg andres on his team, who s an experienced mob prosecutor in new york. >> i mean, that was the first sort of warning signhe trump white house, because, "they're killers," steve bannon calls them. >> narrator: mueller's team had broad authority to investigate trrussian interference, thp campaign, and, in the wake ofme the firing, possible f.struction of justice by the president himsel trump was under siege. in anger, he launched a counterattack. >> this is the single greatest witch hunt of a politician in american history. (tweet sends) there is no collusion and no obstruction. i should be given apology! (tweet sends) you are witnessing the single greatest witch hunt american political history, led by some very bad and conflicted people. >> the president definitely seized on that term "witch hunt." hesed it again and again. he used it in tweets. he used it when he was at a microphone.hi it's som that he felt was working to undermine the mueller investigation. >> after seven months of inv

weissmann mile's team was in touch with -- officials in cypress to discuss manafort and isil something inas iedous going on i think bills in athens must be examined by the investigators, because i think they are marked going all the way back to doj, under the previous fbi under comey even the mueller team if mueller team is going around en trapping campaign associates and trump associates, the way they did to me i am sure it wasn't just me they did it to, going to open up a massive can of worms i think we need to get to the bottom of exactly not only how did this story start, but why were they en trapping us forward. >> so extraordinary i want to make sure audience says with us i take you back we are going to take a short break to reiterate, in the beginning of 2016, you ben carson drops out of the race you are without a job somebody reaches route to you linkedin offers a job for international center for law practice we realize that is connected to fbi you are work for international law practices practices tell them you are going to quit you want to work for trump they say wait don't g

there were people in mueller's committee in the group of people like andrew weissmann who is a diehard hillary supporter probably ticked off the press was covering it. this is probably what the letter was about and the phone call afterwards where mueller was not blaming him. it was just a misunderstanding he was blaming the press coverage. we'll find out what happens. >> sandra: they stay again on the record he offered robert mueller the opportunity to see the findings before he made this public. robert mueller said no. >> i guess that would have created some accountability for mr. mueller and you saw that part of what came through is sort of barr saying in a more polite way, you know, mueller, you had one job and you didn't do it. i think the fact that mr. barr did exactly what he said he was going to do. even gave mueller a chance to look at it and put out the findings as soon as he could and put out the report. >> one word we didn't hear yesterday was collusion. >> the word of the day yesterday was snitty. >> bill: chicago, illinois, prosecutor -- a judge deciding whether or not to