, he has said. not saying anymore. doesn't want to have to go before congress and testify. he defended the investigation. he was very specific in articulating its conclusions. >> there were a number of things he said that could be interpreted as specific pushbacks to things that we hear from the white house. but i have to say, the last statement he made, one presumes that he thinks that that is the most important thing that he's saying, because it's what he's leaving everybody with. that is, there were multiple, systemic attempts, by the russians, to interfere in the 2016 election. and that is something that amidst all of the political back and forth, all of the false claims from the white house and from the president's detractors, keeps getting lost. other countries are trying to interfere in our elections and we are not, according to experts, doing enough to stop that. and that is, i think, what he wanted his last message to be. beyond that, there were a number of things he said that i thought wer

again, i want you to contrast what barr said with what mueller said. here it is. >> the deputy attorney general and i concluded that the evidence developed by the special counsel is not sufficient to establish that the president committed an obstruction of justice offense. >> if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. >> and there's more. >> we did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime. the introduction to the volume 2 of our report explains that decision. it explains that under longstanding department policy, a present president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. that is unconstitutional. even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that, too, is prohibited. a special counsel's office is part of the department of justice, and by regulation, it was bound by that department policy. charging the president with a crime was, therefore, not an option we could consider. >> did you fall for the okey-doke initiall

they said, no. we want you to go talk to the husband. >> reporter: she asked harold how it happened. he said he wasn't entirely sure. >> he did tell me that some lug nuts had fallen underneath the car and she must have gone underneath the car to get those lug nuts and somehow jarred the car. >> reporter: or, harold thought, he might have jarred the car himself when he tossed the bad tire into the trunk. roxanne tried to reassure him that they could still save lynn. was she hanging by a thread? do you think she had already died and they were trying to revive her? >> when you're doing cpr, they're actually dead at that point and, you know, so you're trying to pump their heart. we had called for a helicopter because sometimes when you do cpr you can actually, you know, revive somebody. >> reporter: and miraculously, it seemed, they did manage to revive lynn. >> we actually had a paramedic show up also on the scene, gave her a shot of epinephrine. her heart started beating again, so we were all real hop

this is a he said, he said. this opinion of the olc -- and the olc stance or office of legal counsel. these are the legal gurus who do research for the justice department. when the justice department itself needs to know what the law is, where it's unclear, they get an opinion from the olc. this olc report is dated octobe. it says that a sitting president should not -- not cannot -- should not be indicted while still in office because of material disruption to his constitutional duties. guess what happened 60 days later? in late november and early december of 2000? the justice department charged bill clinton with lying under oath and obstruction of justice. and guess what he did a month later? two weeks before george w. bush was sworn in as president? pleaded guilty to lying under oath. that was under indictment, that was under information. the document filed when the government and the defendant agree on the allegations. that tells you that this olc report is advisory only. it is not mandatory. it is there to u

i said 19. they said we don't employ xix-year- olds. we employ 21 years old. so i just left and then before i went out the door the guy that interviewed me said why don't you come back this afternoon, we may have a job for you. so i just hung around there. 1:00 i went back there and the guy said did you say you are 21 years old? all i could say is yes yes yes yes i am 21 years old. we got you a job for you. you can go this afternoon he told me. so i was 19 years old in the morning, at about 1130, and 1:00 in the afternoon i became 21 years old. that's how i got drafted and i never went home. i went into war thinking that the tribal council says you do this for your family and for your land. i said okay i believe in that. i went and joined the marines and fought for whatever that was said was belonged to be here. after the war 1946 i came back, went back home, i found out the land i was born and somebody was living on it. then i went over there and said hey it's mine. they said nope you have been away for years and never bothered to do anything with it so it's

that said, rick i'll bring you in. before the comments today there was a -- should democrats go for it or is it too politically risky? >> i have argued they need to take their time. impeachment is a process not a thing. they need to move towards it with a strategy. and make sure they're bringing the american people along with them in the process and building the case before you get to impeachment. there are investigatory benefits and accountable benefits. that hold people to account. bring them on the deck and get testimony. and you build the atmosphere where if you reach impeachment and today mueller put the ball firmly in their court and said over to you, nancy. if you do reach that point, you're ready to go. you have it built up and the case made. not only in the court of public opinion but in the political space. >> this is your expertise. you have correctly predicted the last nine presidential elections. from reagan. to trump. nothing is final yet. you are predicting trump will win unless democrats impeach him. ex

he never explicitly said there was no collusion. trump, barr, and graham said that. >> we have been hearing about collusion for so long and now all of us and there's a pivot to we don't want to talk about collusion because at the end of the day the mueller report came out and said there were no charges to be brought here and attorney general bar is correct that the judicial process should not be weapon ice for political ends and that is the point senator graham was making. want to talk about collusion, let's talk about collusion, it is not there. >> you saw katherine's report, the members talked about the origins of this thing and what bar is doing, he said he's working with christopher ray to look, the us attorney looking at things, the inspector general of the doj, barr said he's talking to him as well and senator josh holly who sits on the committee tweeted this. you want to know why the fbi spied, donald trump voters, unelected progressive elites and the government have nothing but contempt for them, to complete contempt. what d

so he said okay. because i knew from greensboro to durham he would be there before i would. >> could you tell whether he had any idea of this? >> he didn't let on like he was aware. >> reporter: word spread fast that something had happened at the apartment complex. the apartment complex.. edythe called to check on denita. >> and she wasn't answering. which was you know, after i call your phone several times as a best friend, you know, somebody's going to call you back. so i was like, that's strange. so my instinct just said call jermeir really quick just to touch bases with him. >> reporter: by now jermeir stroud had left work and was racing to durham. >> i spoke to jermeir. and i'm like, "have you made contact with her?" but i felt like i didn't get a definite answer. it seemed like there was a little bit of confusion. >> what do you mean? >> like when i said, "did you speak with her," and he didn't really give me a yes or a no. >> he just sound a little rushed like, "edythe, you know, just sit tight

you said -- taht leaked. you said it was october 23. no, i'm sorry. i started right after the saturday night massacre. >> what year? >> 1973. we got to know what's on those tapes. i was doctoring these five minutes ago. thank you for bringing that to my attention. i deny everything. ma'am? itit's my understanding doesn't get past until after watergate. >> yes. not claim did nixon executive privilege on the tapes? had he fought it, those tapes would never have been released. >> no, that's not true. the question is why didn't the claim executive privilege? that was the fight over the first nine tapes, where they subpoenaed nine within days of the disclosure of the system. argument, it an -- it was appealed by nixon to the d.c. circuit. and the d.c. circuit said don't make us decide. work out a compromise. that's where cox came up with the idea of third-party authentication. when we lost, we refused that offer. after we lost at the circuit level, we said let's go back to the original idea. he didn't like the idea anymore, having one. that fight, we lost

and i said i don't really have any quotes about that and she said you know it's a love story. there's a happy ending by the way. i won't spoil i it but there's a happy ending between the two. she said give me a little something here. be creative for little. and i do generally know what he's thinking and what she was thinking. so, there was a little. so as it were that close everything i try to keep out because they said no, i can't, i don't want to put that in a. so anyway, we had a little battle over that but then "the wall street journal" picked the one thing that wasn't in the original manuscript. there's about 50 reviews and they are all wonderful except for that one but they dropped anchor on the same thing, just a small comment about it. >> how much spycraft training -- >> where is that question time from? how much training in prayer before the first assignment? >> how much spy training. all soe operatives if you work for m.i. five that handles the double agents, they are all trained extremely well and basically two different training camps if you will. there's one place

when he said that he is not going to ask for immunity and not play those dirty tricks of. foaming of personally loss and fighting with the supreme court and doing everything to undermine the israeli democracy there are only just people who believe that it's democracy is about all in israel who hated what they saw and i think that there will be pressure more and more pressure from the constituency on the attorney general to stop this madness i don't have any other definition to what's happening it's chaos it's madness and it's. maybe something else that starts with c. it's what we can you know is doing is corrupting the israeli society and i think that this is going to be the ultimate test for the very conspicuous either the israeli people and to the tourney general this was the 1st time that we saw the supreme court justice the president of the supreme court judges making very clear statements. about the conduct of the prime minister we saw more than 50000 people are saturday. in a rally and there will be more of that so i think that there is a moment to and if you ask peo

he said i am from san diego. do you believe that? he said we need that wall. in san diego as you know, it is going up. here's what they did and california. they wanted the wall so badly. i said maybe i shouldn't do it, politically, let them ask. i didn't and now it's beautiful. people not coming in, it's beautiful. now they go out and say, we didn't want the wall of the first place! they wanted the wall desperately because they were being flooded with illegal immigrants. is that right? now they don't have that. that is okay. we always went back. somehow we always find a way it would be awfully good if we sat down and we could put that border up so perfectly. the laws of the judges are so against us at sexually incredible but we will win and were winning now it shouldn't be hard, it should be early easy. do know the word raise taxis? does anybody like that? they go out and saying we want to raise your taxes. we want to shut down your energy. they think these are good things. they want to destroy your second amendment. no more second amendment. the republican ca

the couple said their cancer was caused by roundup. the jury found it was a substantial factor in causing the cancer. >> it was good to sigh see that the jury saw what happened to us. >> i think the message is unequivocal, roundup can cause cancer, and it's clear monsanto has known about this for 45 years. >> bayer said we have great simply for mr. and mrs. piliod, but both have long histories of illnesses that are known risk factors for lymphoma. >>> police in pacifica are asking for the public's help in finding a woman who they consider at risk. 67-year-old carmelo leonard smith left her home yesterday afternoon, and she may have been seen later at the bart station. it's believed she took the bus there. she speaks spanish. 5'4", 130 pounds, and her picture is on your screen. she was last seen wearing a red fleece jacket, legs, and new balance tennis shoes. she may be carrying several purses. anyone who has seen her is doesed to call pacifica police. >>> code words with online classified. >> 2 investigates found a lack of resources ca

kind of like i said and. it runs 300 kilometers from source to mouth and there are over $200.00 industrial facilities ranged its banks. i don't like the men getting in. the room here against the 4000 rice fields and supplies drinking water to 25000000 people. at the mall when yes. so many possible that are so many of our people here. join me every thursday on the alec simon show and i'll be speaking to us from the world of politics sports business i'm show business i'll see you then. welcome back as the world arguably said on the precipice a full scale military confrontation between nuclear power is going to be more timely to recall stanley kubrick's iconic black comedy dr strangelove and the end of the world a new exhibition of the legendary director's work seeks to illustrate the 21st century relevance of his entire film all graphy from the warnings about ai in 2001 a space odyssey to the end to u.s. imperialism of full metal jacket we went down to the exhibition at the design museum to speak to stanley kub

he said $15 billion a number of years ago. i said is at the most, he said yes. some people say closer to 20 but $15 billion was about the most. i said good. i'm gonna take $15 billion out of the hundred billion dollars enemy to give that to our farmers. now i don't have to give all that. [inaudible] >> i don't have to give all of it because they're going to be able to sell at a much lower price. the difference between where they were and the lower price, so maybe if it's a 15 billion-dollar amount, they may end up getting six or seven or ten or whatever it is , but they will be able to sell. >> 's are compensating them. >> will tell you an interesting story. i met with farmers about three weeks ago. first of all they are unbelievable patriots. they said sure, we don't want a subsidy, we just want a level playing field. we also know we are being killed by these countries. china is just so much bigger than everybody else. but i said what you mean you don't want subsidy. everybody that comes to see me, they all want to hand out to the only ones that don't want. all

report would have said so it also said his investigation did find that russia attempted to interfere in the 26th presidential election mr maule and also appeared to rule out testifying before congress saying this his testimony was contained in the investigations report on this he has nothing to add 16 presidential election let's get more from the top correspondent to all of the salat in the washington welcome all of our tell us more about what robert mueller has been saying. well there was a very dramatic moment here after 2 years of complete and utter silence this was the very 1st moment that robert mahler took to the public that robert lawler 1 spoke and addressed the public of alt the findings office reports on the investigation of russian interference in the 2016 election so since the start of this investigation he did not speak out publicly this was the 1st time he did and his findings came as a setback for the u.s. president as well for the attorney general william barr and he said the president cannot be charged while in office so this is certainly this was known before but if

and what robert mueller said versus what attorney general barr says that mueller said. is that net carbs or total?... eh, not enough fiber... chocolate would be good... snacking should be sweet and simple. the delicious taste of glucerna gives you the sweetness you crave while helping you manage your blood sugar. glucerna. everyday progress ♪ ♪ this simple banana peel represents a bold idea: a way to create energy from household trash. it not only saves about 80% in carbon emissions... it helps reduce landfill waste. that's why bp is partnering with a california company: fulcrum bioenergy. to turn garbage into jet fuel. because we can't let any good ideas go to waste. at bp, we see possibilities everywhere. to help the world keep advancing. you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term memory. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. ♪work so hard give it everything you got♪ ♪strength of a lioness tough a

so i shouldn't have said it. again, you go back 30 years, you're gonna be able to find clips er and over and over again about me. i have a long paper trail. i mean, there's no question about it. and i say things that are kind of jokes that if people want to pick them apart, then i probably won't, you know, gete federal reserve board. that's why i keep circling this back to, "do you like myas economic i i want blacks to make more money. i want women to make more money. i'y said, you know, prosper is a women's issue, it's a race, isnd it makes everyone -- a rising tide really does liftbo als. i mean, why are people so afraid of having me on the fed? and i think mainly 'cause a lot of my intellectualdversaries are afraid that if i go over there, that i will prevail on a lot of my ideas. >> but, i mean, do you think that's possible, though? do you think you have theto ability ersuade -- >> there's a lot of people on that board. you know, i'll be 1 of 12 votes, so -- but -- >> so which is it? wi you be able to persuad

i think it was in senegal, he said, said, why would you do what your father said? he has your best interest at heart. i said, were moving to senegal. in terms of the role model, arthur goldberg. a second was -- i worked for him for a summer. when he was in the watergate, an honest man. truly an honest man. he was doing his job and i thought he was great. in the third, i learned an awful lot from senator kennedy. when i talk to the students, i say, the thing i put first, one of the things i quote is, i try to live up to it, his credit is a weapon, don't worry about getting the credit for something. don't worry about being a hero to a group of people and getting wonderful credit, worry about getting some accomplishment there. and by the way, if you do achieve something, there will be plenty of credit to go around. if you don't, who once the credit? what he would say, i think he did this, when you're trying to reach agreement on a bill for example, with somebody who does not like it very much or wants a lot of changes, listen to what they say. and if they talk for a w

the mueller report said in the trump tower meeting said the office spoke to every participant except veselnitskaya, and trump jr., the latter of whom declined to be voluntarily interviewed by the office, followed by multiple redactions there. what do you think the redactions could reveal? >> i think there might have been some negotiation to get donald trump jr. to testify. there was probably some sticking point that they couldn't resolve. i think the special prosecutor didn't want to poke the bear, the bear being the president of the united states. but, you know, we're several steps beyond where mueller was when he was doing his investigation. the country is in much greater crisis and i think there are senators and members of the house who want to do something about it. >> it's not the truth. if you look at what's in the report and you look at what don jr. -- we know about the trump tower meeting and also the involvement. michael cohen said he knew about the trump tower moscow project. >> there's no chance that the president didn't know about all of this personally. >> yeah. "new yor

she said, i have to give this back. i said, it is just plain money. she said no, it is a $25,000 check. this was after the show, after the hypnotist had left the area. mys was not staged for benefit. i realized, my god, she is still in a trance. you couldn't tell otherwise. she looked entirely like before the show. but she was seeing something that wasn't there. i mistakenly thought, maybe i can help her out of it. i am late, can i hold that with you? let's bring this closer and look at it. do you see this number here? she says, no, it's a $25,000 check. my heart broke. wow. that is when i realized, that is what they did to sirhan. they painted him this other reality, and when he was in the pantry, he was seeing something else. i didn't know what that something else was at the time. it took a while before i found dr. dan brown's sessions with sirhan. he spent 60 hours with sirhan. his original him a test because -- his original hypnotist believe it or not, the defense did bring in hypnotists to try to get him to "remember" the crime, and basically end

kind of like i said. it runs 300 kilometers from source to mouth and they're out of the $200.00 industrial facilities range tony's bangers. and mash and your muscle. to do 3 things. i would like to tell them and to be. the room irrigates over 4000 rice fields and supplies drinking water to 25000000 people . at the most yes i. want to so many of us about us all. welcome back to crossfire we're all things considered i'm peter lavelle to mind you were discussing some real news. ok now we're joined by alexander macarius in london he is a writer on legal affairs as well as editor in chief of the duran dot com let me go ok before this program was actually yesterday we were talking about your appearance on this program today and you said just a phrase that caught my ear you told me that the u.k. is becoming ungovernable. because of this whole eggs briggs and process here bring us up to speed on what's going on with this dreadful dreadful story bragg's that go ahead alex yes i think it's actually very easy to und

i said, grandma, every car? she said every car. sure enough, we did. so i as a 14-year-old was in charge of the black box operations of that campaign. >> [laughter] sen. gillibrand: anyway, it really created a fondness in me and a real love for public service and for women and women's voices, and that our voices need to be elevated in magnitude, and magnified so that we can be heard. that's never really left me since. when i first ran for congress, i wanted to run in my home district in upstate new york and i did call a friend who is an expert, a pollster, and i said jeffrey, i want to run in new york 20, tell me what my chances are, do you think i can win? he looks up the statistics for new york 20 and it is 2-1 republican so he said no, you actually can't win the district. i said, really? i have been helping candidates for a decade now. i can raise money. i know how to raise money, i can get my message out. he said it doesn't matter, it's 2-1 republican. there's not enough democrats to vote for you. i said well, what happens if i run the perfect camp

i said i agree, but where will you find the money? she said oh, we are going to find the money. for several months, we went a greatnd the library with us but it was an important -- an important manuscript. get theught we should money toward the end of the year when we have end of year funding. so our acquisition office came up with the money. sotheby andted with eventually we purchased it. now, omar ibn said was a scholar. he was born in what is now -- betweenqueathed the rivers of senegal. is one of the most important tribes of west africa. today, the number is about 14 million people. born in this region. school,up, and went to we have to assume it was one of the mosques where he learned to read and write in arabic. but, in his autobiography, he having spent over 25 years studying. >> my name is omar ibn said. betweenplace is futor, the two river spirit i thought numbers -- i thought knowledge under my own brother. i continued my studies for 25 years, then returned to my home where i remained six years. ms. deeb: we're not quite sure what he was studying, but we do know he was

while they have said we do not spy. fact? while they have said we do not spy. no, but the chinese government is what i am talking about. sign is a surveillance state, of course they had their different values to what we have in britain. they are not a democracy, they do not believe in human rights in the same way that we do in the west. they have said they are prepared to sign a this binding agreement. they report that is out today says that does not hold water, because it is a national intelligence law in china that came out in 2017 which obliges companies to share information data and intelligence with state security if asked. labour has announced plans to re—nationalise the national grid for electricity and gas, to provide what the party says will be a better dealfor the public. national grid says the idea would delay investment. labour also says it would install solar panels on nearly two million homes to generate electricity, as part of a new energy policy. labour's big increase in solar panels would build on community projects like this in south london,

his innocence had been proven let's take a look at what he said he said nothing changes from the miller report there was an sufficient evidence and therefore in our country a person is innocent the case is closed thank you. our washington correspondent for salat sent us this reaction. to years of utter and complete silence and for the 1st time since robert a smaller launched his investigation on russian interference in the 2016 election campaign he actually spoke to the public and while many were wondering if this would mark the end of the saga it could in fact be the beginning of something new robert muller delivered a clear statement essentially saying that if you could have indicted the us president he would have done it and that's not the exoneration donald trump and his attorney general have been claiming it's a setback for him and his rhetoric calling the investigation an illegal witch hunt but it also in bolton's democrats whose calls for impeachment have been getting louder and louder every week. well our correspondent was in washington when the miller investigation began she's

and how he said it. listen to the soundbite. >> through a program we had through community colleges we said, look, put together a program for us where we can teach people how to code so they went out literally into the hood, and they found, turned out 54 all women, the vast majority were women of color, no one with more than a high school degree. >> now, niger, in the interest of fairness, i'll even start with you first. do you believe that what joe biden said there and the way he said it was offensive to people of color? >> look, on my side of the line ideological line we are not politically correct, nor are we obsessed with identity politics to the same degree that my friends on the other side of the line are, and the problem is not from folks like us, i mean, you know, we may try to score a few political points because joe yet again has put his mint flavored chew in his mouth on this on china and the campaign has just got started, so looking forward to it, but no, it's not a big deal. i don't see it a

she said, we -- i said, what do you mean? she said, we did it, you're outta there. i started screaming and jumping and just praising god in that little room. i'm just going crazy in there, and kim is trying to -- she's asking them, she didn't know, they tell her you're the first one who's telling her. she thought that i knew. and i'm so glad that it was kim who told me. ainsley: what do you say to create sicks that say, look -- critics that say, look, these are the laws, she's supposed to be behind bars for the rest of her life. what do you say to those folks? >> i would tell them that mercy, that judgment or justice without mercy is not justice at all. that what is the worst thing that you've ever done in your life. do you want to pay for the rest of your life with that? no matter what i did, that there was never an opportunity for redemption, for me to get a second chance. and i've gotten a second chance. and i don't take it lightly. ainsley: ask you don't deny that you did something wrong, and you should have had some time. >> absolutely. i should have had some t

and here is what flood said. i'm reading from the report, the special counsel instead produced a prosecutorial curiosity part truth commission report and part law school exam paper. essentially flood is accusing the special counsel of simply just transmitting evidence without making it clear that he wasn't going to charge the president with obstruction of justice. and then he goes on to say that the report is being seen now about congressional democrats, particularly house judiciary committee chairman jerry nadler as a, quote, road map for continuing to investigate the president over obstruction. that, too, is something that flood is objecting to saying that is simply not the role of the special counsel at all. >> the letter also specifically addresses white house -- the white house allowing advisers to be interviewed by house democrats. what is the take on that? well this is the next step here. so now that congressional democrats are saying they want people like don mcgahn, the former white house counsel, to tes

so i shouldt have said it. again, you go back 30 years, you're gonna be able to findve clips over andand over again about me. i have a long paper trail. i mean, there's no question about it. and i say things that are kind of jokes that if people want to pick them apart, then i probably won't, you know, get on the federal reserve board. k that's whyp circling this back to, "do you like my economic ideas?" i want blacks to make more money. i want women to make more moneyu i've said,now, prosperity is a women's issue, it's a race issue, and it makes everyone -- a rising tide really does lift all boats. i mean, why are people so afraid of having me on the fed?th and k mainly 'cause a lot of my intellectual adversaries are afraid that if i go over there, that i will prevail on a lot of my ideas. >> but, i mean, do you thinkos that'sble, though? do you think you have the ability to persuade -- >> there's a lot of people on that board. you know, i'll be 1 of 12 tes, so -- but -- >> so which is it? will you be able to

justin amash said, you know, it's in your lap. it's in our court. the timing is in nancy pelosi's court. she wants her caucus to overwhelmingly be for this. she wants to bring the public along. one other data point. there's only one republican now. but that one republican coming out, justin amash, is putting pressure on others. time may -- and i emphasize "may" -- move people where if and when she moves to impeachment it is seen as something that the public supports and that is bipartisan on some level. >> it's the bipartisan point you can't overestimate. as a practical and political matter you cannot have impeachment unless the republicans support it. we are a long way off. amash is a caucus of one essentially. we learned yesterday and it changes the framing of the mueller report is possibly from jump robert mueller was constrained by the office of legal counsel guidance that sitting presidents cannot be indicted. that was never on the table for him. therefore, the only remedy to hold a president accountable in office is impeachment. that's effecti

nancy pelosi has said the same. at what point for do you have to make a decision one way or the other, either rule it out or get it started? >> well, it is not on the table and it is not off the table because we are still in evidence gathering mode. we still want to see the unredacted mueller report because we can't trust -- >> are you willing to punt the question if you don't see the unredacted report? some are arguing that you have to launch impeachment proceedings just to see the grand jury information. >> jerry nadler's position has been let's proceed with the heari hearings. and i support that. but he also said let's get the unredact bed mueller report, let's get the underlying documentation particularly because bob mueller won't draw a conclusion, so we needed evidence ourselves so we can arrive at a conclusion. and i still believe bob mueller should testify publicly to the american people. this was a 22 month long investigation that -- >> so do you think jerry nadler subpoena robert mueller? >> we all have a

said he said there was no collusion i think that mahler said maybe not collusion but there was massive interference so i think what muller was trying to do is everybody's interpretating what my report says that the president the attorney general the congress democrats so i'm going to say what i have concluded with after 2 years and i think he came off as a statesman in my judgment so the case for impeachment is it stronger now. it's stronger now but i would follow the leader pelosi i think the congress's job is to legislate and continue investigating their 20 probes going on beyond what moller has come up with the president is resisting the checks and balances of the congress's duty to investigate i think you have to see where this falls but you know there's 40 members of the house that want impeachment proceedings to start there's about 220 i think palosi is right let's do this correctly don't bring politics totally into this let's see where these probes end up but if the president keeps resisting he's got a big his own hole on starting these impeachment proceedings how risky is this

cory booker said the same thing. amy klobuchar said, impeachment proceedings are one way to investigate and hold this administration accountable. when i've been on the campaign trail with amy klobuchar, i regularly ask her about this and she really has said as a senator she's the jury on this so she doesn't want to weigh in either way. the thing she tends to focus on is how do we make our elections secure and the legislation she's tri tried to enact to do that. she's someone who i'm watching. once she gets there, it's going to be interesting to hear her reasoning why. cory booker was pretty forceful about this when he was on msnbc last night. listen to what he said. >> i know the politics of this is problematic. but this is a very deeply principled moral moment in america. for a guy, let me just be clear, who didn't even win the majority of votes in america, who won this through the mandates of our constitution and the electoral college, i mean dear god, this guy cannot in any way be allowed to be above the law. >> a

iraq is forced to take a side, he said, it won't be with america. and he said its country stands with its neighbor, iran and offered to mediate between teheran and washington. so the delicate balancing act continues. >>> coming up why rolling thunder says this memorial weekend ride is its last. my digestive system used to make me feel sluggish but now, i take metamucil every day. it traps and removes the waste that weighs me down, so i feel lighter. try metamucil, and begin to feel what lighter feels like. >>> rolling thunder is going out with a roar this memorial day weekend a a 32-year run, tlouns of motorcyclers are making their final rude in washington d.c. today. security demand and the cost of p permits are to blame. president trump is hoping riders return next year. it began as a way to raise attention for u.s. service men missing in vietnam. >>> finally tonight the wounds of war can cut deeply. in a nation where 20 veterans die by suicide each day, dogs are on the front lines to keep them safe at home. >> reporter: with his gentle devotion t

did you hear what i said? i said there is no tool in our toolbox that we should not explore. >> and yet, with that escalating battle as backdrop, in a truly surreal scene, chuck schumer and nancy pelosi took a group of democrats to the white house today to try and make a deal with the president on a bipartisan infrastructure bill. joining me now, uc berkeley professor, former labor secretary, who argues in a new column for "newsweek" that congress should be ready to arrest the attorney general if he defies a subpoena. and former congresswoman who voted to impeach richard nixon. let me start with you as a former member of congress. there's a question about how much you should be dual tracking the way that you relate to the white house, right? what do you think about the fact that they are waging this sort of defensive battle against oversight and that at the same time you have democratic leaders going to the white house to be like, hey, maybe we can make an infrastructure deal? >> well, i know it's kind of craz

beijing has already said it will retaliate. it hasn't said how. it has a number of options before it. there's every expectation they will follow through on them. farmers and farm exports are likely to be first target because they know it can cause some political pain for president trump as well. while president trump is saying that it will be china that will bear the brunt of the trade war his top economic adviser larry kudlow suggested on fox news yesterday that both sides will pay the price. for americans that means paying more for everything, luggage, sporting equipment, food and seafood. and officials here are saying that there can be no agreement until all tariffs are cancelled. the sticking point appears to be subsidies. the u.s. has a problem with the way that china will give grants and cheap loans to chinese companies. the u.s. says that this muddies competition. but china is saying it's not going to let any foreign country tell it to change its laws. >>> thank you. >>> let's turn to one of china's allies north korea. president trump is do

i just listened to her use the word matter. >> it's he said/she said. both of them have been painted and james comey most recently by the president, as a liar. somebody's not telling the truth or there's been a complete misunderstanding of the english language with regard to that meeting. i hear what you're saying but i disagree. what i think it is, the court of public opinion has never really been included to this degree. we are releasing the transcripts. you can see what loretta lynch said. this is all ab saving face for themselves. >> based on the meeting loretta lynch had with bill clinton on the tarmac, i'm sure he wanted to translate the matter. >> okay. president trump speaking at a rally in central pennsylvania last night, accusing those who investigated his 2016 campaign of committing treason. and saying attorney general william barr is going to get to the bottom of it all. >> there was treason. it should never be allowed to happen to another president again, ever! ever! ever! we have a great new attorney general who's gonna give it a very fair

chairman nadler asked the attorney general to come and he said yes. after the attorney general said he would come to the committee, to speak to every member, they moved to change the rules. even cnn cannot find any history of that happening before. the only time an individual, a staffer questioned somebody was during watergate. nadler has been wanting to impeach the day after the election. he can't have the facts to prove of why he should, but he will not stop. this is what the american public is frustrated about, the politics of attacking individuals. when you look at the democratic party, they now want to weaponize the irs. they want to go after -- continue to go after the president. they are trying to go after his family. this has got to stop. the american public wants us to move forward and solve the problems. yes. reporter: do you think speaker pelosi should bring to the floor [indiscernible] mr. mccarthy: i believe nancy pelosi should bring it to the floor. one of the major questions that democrats asked before it would come to the floor is that

you said it, i didn't. [laughter] [inaudible conversations] i'm a joe biden fan, i just think his time was four years ago. trish: -- on this network and, you know, joe biden, obviously, we've watched him throughout the years. and i think he has a personality that people find appealing and that resonates. in fact, i think if the democrats put joe biden up, he would have been a much harder candidate to beat instead of hillary. >> agreed. trish: but now i look at him and some to have recent comments on china or margaret thatcher suggest he's a little out of touch in a way that, you know, tim ryan isn't. i mean, tim ryan -- and, again, i've spoken to him on the program, and i know a lot of people won't like him because he's a democrat period, but he gets the trade issues which you confront out there in ohio and the country con fronts overall. >> exactly. this is exactly why it's not just because he's from my hometown, but he has a really good mix of being younger, having experience and also being from the middl

they initially said no, at least their lower-level people said no. told them to shop it to dhs and see if dhs one of the citizenship question. dhs said, not our work. go back to doj. they go back to doj, the people they are in touch with, that are not low-level, but they're not the highest level, say no. and secretary of commerce speaks to the head of the doj, and the head of the doj says, we will give you anything you need. they do a letter, the letter says the acs is not enough. what the letter doesn't say is, if you supplemented with administrative records, which 60 let you do and tells you you should do to maximize the extent possible, that the actual count is accurate, and we do know that there will be less people being reported which is the whole purpose of the survey. how many people there are, and nobody doubts that there will be less people reported, the maximum need of the census survey report, not citizenship. let's not confuse the two things. the enumeration is how many people reside here. not how many are citizens. that's what the census

chemical attack conclusions in its in inverted commas their chemical attack i've always said alleged because the evidence was never forthcoming now it looks like a leak is showing that those of us that said alleged were right all along go ahead charles. yes you're right remember even in the immediate aftermath of the do a chemical attack alleged chemical attack in march 2018 in which dozens of people civilians were 40 to have been killed graphic photos you remember video shots especially of many children who suffered apparent catastrophic deaths and i think as much doubt that people did actually die systems how they died and who was responsible that was the issue when you remember that the white house mates as with all of these alleged atrocities was there producing video that was then used as evidence by the u.k. in the us remember the u.k. actually founded the white helmets the u.k. the u.s. and others in the west funding the organization purported rescuers who produced endless propaganda. against assad think they they hide that that will actually do try and hide it against assad b

he said yes. grace reached out to birch and he not only sent grace a copy of one of his amicus briefs, he talked to her on the phone about the history of the bill and how life was for girls before it was passed. he saw something and he did something. i served as grace's scheduler and one of my conversations with perch he said these girls today expect to be treated equally. pause. and he added, that was exactly the point. [applause] mrs. magnus-stinson: i have kept email i willnd one share, high, call me on my ship -- on my cell, birch. [laughter] mrs. magnus-stinson: his generosity touch is greatly. in 2012, the indiana fever hosted a celebration of the anniversary of title ix. birch was the star of attraction along with my colleague. due in noration was small part to the work of kelly who was a knowledge that the outset of our ceremony the first woman to serve as an assistant general manager in the nba. in many ways, i see kelly as the fulfillment of the dream in title ix's objective to well done

he said no, gavin williamson said something very similar. there we re said something very similar. there were tory mps who are pointing the finger at mr williamson, they said he had a record of leaking things to the press and causing mischief. but asi the press and causing mischief. but as i say, he is absolutely denying any involvement in this. subsequently followed are... let's just concentrate on that investigation pretty mode. as we sign the letter, theresa may said, a piteous evening the later information —— i put to you this evening the latest information about the investigation. have they given any more information about that investigation how is conducted? leg no, there was some scepticism about this investigation doesn't these things have been better get in the past and it is really hard to prove. you might have the phone records of someone's adviser or the abdomen so themselves, they may have a vehicle ofa themselves, they may have a vehicle of a phone call. that is the problem, to have conclusive evidence can be difficult. this has been carried out pretty quickly by

even steph curry said they stole this one. it was right there for the blazers, and the warriors had a monster 3rd quarter. they win 114-111. early on, all blazers. cannot miss the shoes. finishing with 3, down by 15 at the break. the warriors, curry unloading one of his own, and that's a 3. steph just getting started, and he had a little help, too. how about clay thompson, and he will play with 24, stops, hops, nails that one as part of his 39-point 3rd quarter for the warriors. and now watch steph's brother. that was mom and dad. under 30 seconds to play, and that's beautiful. an open draymond green, and that was your ball game. the warriors win game 2, 114- 111, now the commanding lead in the series, and here's the coach on the game that could have gone either way. >>> we have been here before. i think the experience helped us, and we have done this a few times, and yeah, we stole it for sure. they outplayed us. >> everyone contributed. very exciting way to win. you have to play better than the 1st half, for sure. >> the win

their real obsession, zuck said people think we're all about data. he said what we're really all about is attention, which i was surprised to hear. >> brown: in 30 se, onnce you talked to him, what's your sense of how confident he ises about changes and how committed he is to real change, especially concerning privacy. >> i think mark zuckerberg has always been a person who cared more about human behavior and growth than actual money. rememb, he wanted to connect the world and make facebookhe freepeople didn't want facebook to be free. so i think he's confident that if we n in the atttion game, the dollars will follow and, so, all street rewards that. in terms of the sincerity around preracy, just remember, in o to get people's attention, as mark says that's the most important thing, you need to know things aboutem th you need to collect data. it's deeply in that company's dnto profile your behavior, to understand behavior, to create psychological learning tactics, to keep your attention there, and i don't see that ging away. >> brown: elizabe dwoski

because barr said, look, if he wanted to say that trump should be indicted, he should have just said that trump should be indicted. but mueller was following the policy of the department of justice. he couldn't indict trump. he knew he couldn't indict trump. and the whole reason he didn't come to that conclusion, as he said, was because he didn't want to have an unfair situation where he made an accusation to which trump didn't have a form to defend himself. so the idea that mueller could have dropped the ball or was too lazy or too incompetent to come to a conclusion seems precisely wrong here. >> how significant, evan, will all of this be when mueller finally, and i assume it will happen probably sooner rather than later, when mueller appears before a congressional committee? >> well, it's imperative that he does. and according to bill barr, he has no objection to this. so i think it's clear that the house democrats will probably be the venue for that, according to lindsey graham. he's not very interested. but again, if lindsey graham, as you heard in the hearing today, lindsey gra

what's also new is that robert mueller said congress said here it is, take it. it's different from what william barr said. >> he did. the magnitude of the president's misconduct comes through differently when you hear it directly from mueller himself, especially since we haven't heard his voice in two years. i would caution, however, that there are -- what did we say? 38 democrats that called for impeachment hearings. do you know what that means? 85% of democrats in the house haven't called for the hearings. the idea that there is a tidal wave of support for impeachment hearings in the house of representatives is not true. that's why i think nancy pelosi's position won't change. >> david gregory, what do you think changed yesterday if anything? >> there was something powerful. i agree with what was said. something powerful about to me mueller saying two things. every american ought to pay attention to the fact that russia tried to interfere, did interfere in our presidential election and tried to hurt one of our candidates, namely hillary clinton. and saying it

you said there was no discussion of war. but what was discussed >> this is purely iranian and proxy-based threat at this point in time. that was discussed. the secretary said he complied with the law. and yeah, i think it's premature though to be talking about an aumf when we are in a mode of deterrence. we are not in a mode of aggression. we are protecting if our soldiers are attacked we will respond in full force. >> you know, the iranian say they see it differently they don't view it as deterrence they view it as aggression. isn't that important, too how the iranianens view it. >> i think it's always important inside the head of your enemy. but the facts is they are the ones being aggressive. they are the ones launching the attacks and the vessels and the persian gulf. they are the ones firing a rocket in the green zone. near our embassy. we cannot sit back and allow those attacks to occur without a proper defense and deterrent strategy. >> you say you are not going to where. does that exclude strategic military strike, i