to chris for a f.b.i. director talking about the pain of losing agents in the line of duty i think we're still we're kind of just warming up here i think what many are expecting to be later of a more lively exchange and hearing at the senate judiciary committee they're looking into well they're kind of investigating the rush of investigations of the origins of that investigation amid concerns among some members of congress that it was too politicized. now a major challenge facing britain's new prime minister is to reduce tension with iran iranian diplomats do in vienna on sunday to discuss how to save the 2015 nuclear deal they're meeting representatives from britain china france germany and russia britain's foreign secretary is calling for a european led naval mission to ensure the safety of shipping in the gulf also jabari has more of the iranian capital. iran's foreign minister mohammad javad zarif is the 1st official to comment on the latest developments out of london the foreign minister tweeted that

fired steele a top f.b.i. investigator and his lover another top f.b.i. official constantly texted about how much they hated trump and wanted to stop him from being elected and the entire investigation was opened based not on 5 eyes intelligence but on a tip from a foreign politician about a conversation involving joseph of miffs it is a maltese diplomat who's widely portrayed as a russian agent but seems to have far more connections with western governments including our own f.b.i. and our own state department than with russia brazenly ignoring all these red flags as well as the transparent absurdity of the claims they are making the democrats of argued for nearly 3 years that evidence of collusion is hidden just around the corner like the loch ness monster insist it's there even if no one can find consider this in march 2017 democrats on this committee said they had more than circumstantial evidence of collusion but they couldn't reveal it yet mr moeller was soon appointed and they said he would find the collusion and when no collusion was found and mr

f.b.i. he is head of the hate crime and terrorism investigation. the f.b.i. has spearheaded efforts to protect places of worship from violence including trainings on out to make them more secure. thank you very much for being with us here today, director ray. [applause] >> thanks, beth. on april th, of 1968, a day after this assassination of dr. martin luther king jr., robert kennedy lamented what he called the mindless menace of violence in america. he said that whenever we tear at the fabric of life that people have woven for themselves and their families, the whole nation is degraded. and he called on americans to remember that those who live with us are our brothers and sisters who seek and i quote nothing but the chance to live out their lives in purpose and happiness." and in many ways we still confront that same mindless menace of violence. we still confront people who trade in hatred, people who seek to harm others because of where they come from, how they worship, what they look lik

records so they do not just turn them over just because the f.b.i. or ice or homeland security requests that they require a court order but so many other states have not required that so that's that's the 1st point but the 2nd point is that you're absolutely right consent is key here there is no consent on the part of the driver there is no consent on the part of the citizen who is having their face collected as part of this and if you say well but look but the state own the d.m.v. records right there are the ones who take the pictures they're the ones who issued the licenses that's true. but facial recognition is not the collection of driver's licenses facial recognition is taking bio metric data standing that processing it and placing it into a catalog system your biometric data meaning your facial imprint meaning the the 14 or 32 points on your face that are required in order to get a biometric scan are actually your property it's your likeness it actually belongs to you and so they don't have the right to simply take that in collected at will the

source one provided reliable information to the f.b.i. the f.b.i. believed source one as reporting to be credible. do you believe the f.b.i.'s assertion that it was credible is accurate. ? >> i won't answer that. >> you won't respond to any questions with regard to christopher steele or your interviews with him. >> as i said this morning that was one of the investigations i could not speak to. >> i don't understand how if you intervaoufd an individual in the purview of this investigation that you have closed the investigation how it is not in your purview to tell us about the investigation and who you interviewed. >> i have nothing to add. >> the american people want to know and i'm very hopeful and glad that a.g. barr is looking into this and the inspector general because you are unwilling to answer the questions of the american people as it relates to the very basis of this investigation into the president and the very basis of this individual who you did interview. you have are just refusing to answer those questions. can't the president fire the

essentially you think about it this way the f.b.i. has decided and ice and other federal agencies have decided that they don't need your permission to log you into a mass of an ever growing facial recognition database and in order to get your image they have done something that's actually fairly expedient which is to go around to states all around the country and to access the department of motor vehicles the d.m.v. records which houses photographs of millions of americans and to access those photographs by simply sending an e-mail to the state and saying we want to go through your your records and the states are agreeing to this 21 states to have a have agreed to allow the f.b.i. and ice and other agencies for as little as just an email requesting permission have agreed to allow those federal agencies to scan in to catalog and to create their ever expanding as i said facial recognition platform by using department of motor vehicle pictures and the bottom line is that you as a driver that i as a driver have never signed up for this we

whereby source one provided reliable information the f.b.i. the f.b.i. believes source one's reporting here and to be credible do you believe the f.b.i. has representation that source ones reporting was credible to be accurate. so you're not going to respond to any of the questions regarding christopher steele or your interviews with them as i said at the outset this morning that was one of the investigations i could not speak too well i don't understand how if you interviewed an individual in the purview of this investigation that you're testifying to us today that you've closed that investigation how that's not within your purview to tell us about that investigation and who you interviewed nothing dad. ok well the i can guarantee that the american people want to know and i'm and i'm very hopeful and glad that 80 bars looking into this inspector general's looking into this because you're on willing to answer the questions of the american people as a relates to the very basis of this investigation into the president and the very basis of this individual

>> i would say i personally know, but the f.b.i. quite obviously has the attacks such as russia took in 2016. >> now, director mueller, is there any information you'd like to share with this committee that you have not so far today? >> that's a broad question. and it will take me a while to get an answer to it, but i'll say no. >> mr. mueller, you sahd that every american should pay very close attention to the systematic and sweeping fashion in which the russians interfered in our democracy. are you concerned that we are not doing enough currently to prevent this from happening again? >> i'll speak generally, and what i said in my opening statement this morning and here, that no, much more needs to be done in order to protect against this intrusion, not just by the russians, but others as well. >> thank you, director. >> we have two five-minute periods remaining. mr. niewn expes myself. mr. nunes, you are recognized. >> mr. mueller, it's been a long day for you. and you've had a long great career. i want to thank you for your longti

records so they do not just turn them over just because the f.b.i. or ice or homeland security requests that they require a court order but so many other states have not required that so that's that's the 1st point but the 2nd point is that you're absolutely right consent is key here there is no consent on the part of the driver there is no consent on the part of the citizen who is having their face collected as part of this and if you say well below that the state own the d.m.v. records right there are the ones who take the pictures they're the ones who issued the licenses that's true but facial recognition is not the collection of driver's licenses facial recognition is taking bio metric data standing that processing it and placing it into a catalog system your biometric data meaning your facial imprint meaning the the 14 or $32.00 points on your face that are required in order to get a biometric scan are actually your property it's your likeness it actually belongs to you and so they don't have the right to simply take that in collected at will th

essentially you think about it this way the f.b.i. has decided and ice and other federal agencies have decided that they don't need your permission to log you into a massive an ever growing facial recognition database and in order to get your image they have done something that's actually fairly expedient which is to go around to states all around the country and to access the department of motor vehicles the d.m.v. records which houses photographs of millions of americans and to access those photographs by simply sending an e-mail to the state and saying we want to go through your your records and the states are agreeing to this 21 states to have a have agreed to allow the f.b.i. and ice and other agencies for as little as just an email requesting permission have agreed to allow those federal agencies to scan in to catalog and to create their ever expanding as i said facial recognition platform by using department of motor vehicle pictures and the bottom line is that you as a driver that i as a driver have never signed up for this we

records so they do not just turn them over just because the f.b.i. or ice or homeland security requests that they require a court order but so many other states have not required that so that's that's the 1st point but the 2nd point is that you're absolutely right consent is key here there is no consent on the part of the driver there is no consent on the part of the citizen who is having their face collected as part of this and if you say well below that the state own the d.m.v. records right there are the ones who take the pictures they're the ones who issued the licenses that's true. but facial recognition is not the collection of driver's licenses facial recognition is taking bio metric data standing that processing it and placing it into a catalog system your biometric data meaning your facial imprint meaning the the 14 or 32 points on your face that are required in order to get a biometrics are actually your property it's your likeness it actually belongs to you and so you don't have the right to simply take that in collected at will there has

guardian newspaper in november of 2017 a month after my name was released and muller steam and the f.b.i. looked at me and basically started to laugh and they said this is a man meaning joseph de of many connections and if you had only worn a wire against him none of this would have happened to you so by that point by december of 2017 i knew clearly that this was a sop we can get in touch with the president as of. we don't know why he was with boris johnson particularly in that photograph he is still perceive as being a putin agent but your book appears to make clear that he noted he would do undermine the russia and the united states would arguably willed peace and detour want who is he the overwhelming evidence of joseph to which you could do a simple google search and understand what i'm saying and i'm echoing the same statements of congressman devon una's of california and other republican members of congress who i've testified in front of for 8 hours where they all believe that joseph said was either willfully or on will fully cooperating or colluding if you will with western intell

has extensive experience as a pro a federal prosecutor and at the f.b.i. where he served as my chief of staff mr is a mr sedley was responsible for the day to day oversight of the investigations conducted by our office and i also want to again say thank you to the attorneys it b i agents the analysts the professional staff who helped us conduct this investigation in a fair and independent manner these individuals who spent nearly 2 years working on this matter were of the highest integrity let me say one more thing over the course of my career i have seen a number of challenges to our democracy the russian government's effort to interfere in our election is among the most serious as i said on may 29th this deserves the attention of every american thank you mr chairman thank you we will now proceed on to the 5 minute rule with questions i would begin by recognizing myself for 5 minutes. director mueller the president has repeatedly claimed that your report found there was no obstruction and that it completely and totally exonerated him but that is not what

f.b.i. and intelligence community -- at least part of it -- to try to win an election. we hadn't had that before. now, we had -- we've known for some time now that j. edgar hoover was at the f.b.i. so long that he began to use the f.b.i., not as a political weapon to win for one party or another but just as his weapon to be able to get what he wanted from presidents, regardless of their party. f.b.i. all seeing interviewed, retired, talking about hoover sending them to watch the apartment of a woman with whom president kennedy was supposedly having an affair and they watched it be burglarized and they didn't report it, didn't file charges. in fact, they wanted to make sure -- find out exactly what was stolen during the burglary. and they never reported it because their job was to gather information for the head of the f.b.i. and the head of the f.b.i. could then use it to prevent a president from doing anything the f.b.i. director didn't want him to do. which, as i understand it, gave rise t

guardian newspaper in november of 2017 a month after my name was released and muller steam and the f.b.i. looked at me and basically started to laugh and they said this is a man meaning joseph of many connections and if you had only worn a wire against him none of this would have happened to you so by that point by december of 2017 i knew clearly that this was a sop we can get in touch with the president as of. we don't know why he was with boris johnson particularly in that photograph he is still busy of his being a putin agent but your book appears to make clear that he noted he would do undermine the russia and the united states would arguably willed peace and detour want who is the overwhelming evidence of joseph which you could do a simple google search and understand what i'm saying and i'm echoing the same statements of congressman devon una's of california and other republican members of congress who i've testified in front of for 8 hours where they all believe that joseph said was either willfully or on will fully cooperating or colluding if you will with western intelligence ag

for example i am unable to address questions about the initial opening of the f.b.i.'s russia investigation which occurred months before my appointment or matters related to the so-called steel dossier these matters are subject of ongoing review by the department any questions on these topics should therefore be directed to the f.b.i. or the justice department as i explained when we closed the special counsel's office in may our report contains our findings and analysis and the reasons for the decisions we made we conducted an extensive investigation over 2 years in writing the report we stated the results of our in investigation with precision we scrutinize every word and do not intend to summarize or describe the results of our work in a different way in the course of my testimony today as i said on may 29th the report is my testimony and i will stay within that text and as i stated in may i will not comment on the actions of the attorney general or of congress i was appointed as a prosecutor and i intend intend to adhere to that role and to the department standards

to take over the investigation the f.b.i. refused a repeated request for an interview referring us to their website and the history of the boston office it can be found a very brief mention of the f.b.i.'s 990 investigation. the f.b.i. concluded that the tragedy was neither a criminal know a terrorist incident. this funding was not published until 2010 about 10 years after the crash yet the n.t.s.b. did not attract its report or reconsider its conclusions. it was clear. in whatever language there was a struggle going on in the cockpit of the $76.00 but how was there a struggle what all we heard was a captain come back and say what's happening what's happening and if you read the. rest of this struck script that has been the text recording. it well you'll see it. in flight 990 s last moments the captain returned to the flight deck and gave frantic instructions to his karpov. that it was. that. he did. there's no evidence according to the that the data that was issued by the n.t.s.b. to indicate that it was a struggle in the co

to be the next prime minister here in britain how to get into a situation where you were asking an f.b.i. agents whether they had contacted boris johnson that's that's a great point and thank you very much for having me what you're referring to is the meeting i had with the muller team in december of 20172 months after my name went public regarding my guilty plea and i was in discussions with miller's team basically trying to actually understand what was happening in my case because at that point i started to have contacts by various reporters who were telling me that my story wasn't adding up the way that my status of offense was presented to the world and that it looked like there was some sort of sort of set up that occurred in my case and likely in other cases involving trump associates so i was i asked robert mueller steam why are you not arresting joseph if he's been living openly in london for the last year and he's attending parties with boris johnson there was this famous picture that had been circulating i think in the guardian newspaper in november of 2017 a month after my nam

next prime minister here in britain how on earth did you get into a situation where you were asking an f.b.i. agent whether they had contacted boris johnson that's that's a great point and thank you very much for having me what you're referring to is the meeting i had with the muller team in december of 20172 months after my name went public regarding my guilty plea and i was in discussions with miller's team basically trying to actually understand what was happening in my case because at that point i started to have contacts by various reporters who were telling me that my story wasn't adding up the way that my status of offense was presented to the world and that it looked like there was some sort of sort of set up that occurred in my case unlikely in other cases involving trump associates so i was i asked robert mueller steam why are you not arresting joseph if he's been living openly in london for the last a year and he's attending parties with boris johnson and there was this famous picture that had been circulating i think in the guardian newspaper in november of 2017 a month after my

to take over the investigation the f.b.i. refused i repeated request for an interview referring us to their website and the history of the boston office it can be found a very brief mention of the f.b.i. 990 investigation. the f.b.i. concluded that the tragedy was neither a criminal know a terrorist. incident. this funding was not published until 2010 about 10 years after the crash yet the n.t.s.b. did not attract its report or reconsider its conclusions. it was clear. in whatever language there was a struggle going on in the cockpit of the $76.00 but how was there a struggle what all we had was a captain come back and say what's happening what's happening and if you read the. rest of this struck script that has been the text recording. it well you'll see it. in flight 990 s last moments the captain returned to the flight deck and gave frantic instructions to his karpov. that it was. that. he did. there's no evidence according to the that the the data that was issued by the n.t.s.b. to indicate that it was a struggle in the c

your response should be a moral obligation to tell the f.b.i. mr. mueller, the former f.b.i. director and arguably the straightest arrow in public service, said as much this afternoon. so if the president or other members of his family or campaign can't be trusted to do the right thing and report their foreign contacts and foreign offers of assistance to their political activities, then we need to make it a legal requirement. and that's what my legislation, the fire act, is all about. the fire act is a simple, narrowly targeted bill. all it does is make sure that attempts to interfere in future presidential elections are promptly reported to the f.b.i. and the f.e.c. let me be clear, the fire act is not about prohibiting innocent contacts or the exercise of first amendment rights. contrary to some of the mistaken rhetoric we heard, it does not require reporting of contacts with foreign journalists or dreamers or official meetings with foreign governments. it is simply about preserving americans' trust in our democratic process. if a candidate is receiving or welcoming help fr

an extremely tight lipped you know is 10 years a sorry 12 years f.b.i. director appeared many times in front of congress has never never been one of his most favorite things to do but certainly part of his job as f.b.i. director he did not want to be in the limelight did not want to be seen as politicizing the situation the report him to be viewed as a political operative or partisan and so he definitely want to be there to be used as a punching bag by either side he wants the report and the facts to stand for yourselves briefly before we go alternately this testimony today what does it mean for the current president u.s. president trump before donald trump and his spokes person is already putting out comments that this was an old image failure for democrats a waste of everyone's time shows just reinforce the fact that trump is innocent of all charges exonerated as trump lives to say that's going to be his message going forward of course democrats we pushing hard that there's a lot of inclusive evidence and maybe a case for impeachment or at least damagi

an extremely tight lipped you know 10 years 12 years as f.b.i. director appeared many times in front of congress has never never been one of his most favorite things to do but certainly part of his job as f.b.i. director he did not want to be in the limelight did not want to be seen as politicizing the situation the report him to be viewed as a political operative or partisan and so he definitely want to be there to be used as a punching bag by either side he wants the report and the facts to stand for yourself briefly before we go alternately this testimony today what does it mean for the current president u.s. president of course donald trump and his spokes person is already putting out comments that this was an old failure for democrats a waste of everyone's time shows just reinforce the fact that trump is innocent of all charges exonerated is trump likes to say that's going to be his message going forward of course democrats we pushing hard that there's a lot of inclusive evidence and maybe a case for impeachment or at least damaging his reel

senators the f.b.i. director facing questions including about the investigation into russian allegations of interference the lights go out again in venezuela so he was the government blaming this time and on the sports the minnesota twins are on their way to a legal record and they will have that story in about 20. in the drawing air over iran temperatures get pretty hard to rounds been hovering around the 4041 mark knopfler last week it's a there change there and you just drove a little bit further south into the plains of iraq and baghdad up to the high forty's we saw 50 actually just in this part around not far away from the border with kuwait again it's all repeat it was nothing but sunshine of course a fair breeze direction the breeze makes a difference i was 40 hunter on that's not making much of difference with $29.00 they would indicate something coming off the water off the east tonight but baghdad still $47.00 that breeze has been bringing the heat slowly science woods with it a slight change i

f.b.i. which is india's leading institute austin book on the campus and point. f.b.i. has all to see major pushes against the time limits and hoping that this has been the strongest and hopefully also be able to contribute some energy to that. when for that do it supposed to do a show at f.b.i. asked. well the director all to institutionalise. consular officials you know 2 days before on some bureaucratic kind of pretext but i have a feeling you just didn't really want us to play that so you went to a meeting by this organization called it from what i gather it's the 1st time i met them all it's a well it's a people's organization they're very much kind of pushing for change which is exactly the kind of people that i want to work for. they've never really heard big of music before that never really experienced based on a sound system before so you don't know if this thing is going to go kind of. a law that i or you. i mean. i know i i don't. i mean you see me as you get to. go to you because

fortunately, the f.b.i. told him from blowing up a church and slaughtering innocent american christians. unfortunately, american lives are still at risk from terrorists masquerading as refugees. mr. speaker, i ask -- how many dead americans does it take to to e open borders advocates secure our borders and protect american lives? unfortunately, no one knows because socialist democrats have shown there is no amount of american blood on their hands that will cause them to protect american lives by securing america's borders. mr. speaker, i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the chair recognizes the gentleman from pennsylvania, mr. fitzpatrick, for five minutes. mr. speaker, i rise today to recognize rose marie, an accomplished artist from bristol, pennsylvania. in addition to receiving numerous awards throughout her career, her most recent acrylic painting entitled "the passage" was recognized as best in show at the 70th festival last week. her abstract painting, combining vibrant colors and masterful stroke

just the day before yesterday, f.b.i. director christopher wray came before the judiciary committee. and he warned that the russians are actively trying to interfere in our elections right now in real time as we speak here. he has told this body that if a foreign agent or government tries to help a campaign, the f.b.i. would want to know about it. that also is a matter of simple moral duty and patriotic duty and common sense. when asked if he would accept foreign help in 2020, the president said, quote, i'd take it. this is much like what his son don, jr., said. quote, i love it, end quote, in response to russia's offer of assistance to the trump campaign in that june 9 meeting, now infamous in these halls and in the country. when mueller was asked about it yesterday he said, quote, i hope this is not the new normal, but i fear it is. well, it doesn't have to be the new normal if congress passes the duty report act. this legislation would assure that any campaign, literally any campaign offered any assistance from any for

of the f.b.i. china poses a more serious counterintelligence threat to the u.s. than any other country including russia now you made the comments while testifying before a hearing of the senate judiciary committee where he was asked about russian interference in the u.s. electoral process even though the hearing was not specifically about that all this comes a day before the man who led the investigation into moscow's interference in the election testifies everything we've done against russia has deterred them enough all the sanctions all the talk but they're still at it well my view is until they stop they have church and they're still doing it yes jeremy is associate professor in the scholar school of policy and government at george mason in washington he says the f.b.i. director is stuck between a rock and a hard place. well i think what's going on is democrats are going to try and score some points because ray is in a difficult position the president has been attacking the f.b.i. as have many republicans and yet ray leads that organization deeply believes tha

and pierce sallingere working for kennedy shared f.b.i. files. f.b.i. files. robert kennedy. robert kennedy agreed and agreed to order wiretaps of martin luther king. lyndon johnson, wiretapped humphrey, his vice president. this is what i want to get at. there are abuses, uses of the i.r.s., f.b.i. to go after the political opponents and go after newspapers and go after newspaper men. our president has done none of that. yet, you would think he is a dictator. if you listen to msnbc and scarborough, i don't know how many times they care him to a nazi or hitler or the words come up describing the president of the united states. you really have to be really unhinged. speaking of that, remember that period that they were bringing a professor in from yale. she and 26 others wrote a back about how the president of the united states -- they never met the president of the united states. how he was mentally unhinged. they pulled the same thing on barry goldwater in 1964. >> sean: you write about that in the book. >> i give the history. this isn't news. but the people made news. they p

as criminal division and the f.b.i. director so thank you i appreciate that and having reviewed your biography it puzzles me why you handled your duties in this case the way you did. report contradicts what you taught young attorneys at the department of justice including to ensure that every defendant is treated fairly or is just a sutherland said in the berger case a prosecutor is not the representative of an ordinary party to a controversy but of a sovereignty whose interest in a criminal prosecution is not that it's one it case but that justice shall be done and that the prosecutor may strike hard blows but he is not at liberty to strike out ones by listing the 10 factual situations and not reaching a conclusion about the merits of the case you are unfairly shifted the burden of proof to the president forcing him to prove his innocence while denying him a legal form to do so and i've never heard of a prosecutor declining a case and then holding a press conference to talk about the defendant you noted 8 times in your

would require f.b.i., d.h.s. and the national counterterrorism center to produce an annual report and join strategic stieges -- intelligence assessments on terrorism. chairman thompson's amendment would add safeguards to protect the civil liberties and privacy of individuals whose information would be contained in the report and mandate compliance with the data quality act. it also makes d.h.s. disclose information on domestic terrorism matters, enhancing oversight in this area. i'd like to recognize chairman thompson for his work and that of the house homeland security committee. all that he has done on the issue of domestic terrorism, together we'll continue our lines of effort to address this significant threat. once again, i thank my colleague for his work and i yield back time and urge support for the amendment. the chair: the gentleman from mississippi. mr. thompson: madam chair, i have closed. i yield back. the chair: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the question is on the amendment offer

to take over the investigation the f.b.i. refused a repeated request for an interview referring us to their website and the history of the boston office it can be found a very brief mention of the f.b.i. 990 investigation. the f.b.i. concluded that the tragedy was neither a criminal know what terrorist incident. this funding was not published until 2010 about 10 years after the crash yet the n.t.s.b. did not attract its report or reconsider its conclusions. it was clear. in whatever language there was a struggle going on in the cockpit of the $76.00 but how was there a struggle what all we had was a cat and come back and say what's happening what's happening and if you read the. rest of this struck script that has been the text recording. it well you'll see it. in flight 990 s last moments the captain returned to the flight deck and guy frantic instructions to his copilot. get. that night. that. he. has no evidence according to that the data that was issued by the n.t.s.b. to indicate that it was a struggle in the cockpit so

and the f.b.i., obama's f.b.i. hid the exculpatory evidence that this was opposition research. that is a crime! gregg nailed it. it's an absolute crime, abuse of power. this is when the house of cards begins to crumble for the democrats and obama's former flunkies including clapper and including brennan. >> this is why it's so important what the inspector general is doing and what the attorney general barr is doing and certainly what mr. durham, the prosecutor is doing in this. i want to talk about the other part of what catherine herridge talked about. that is this idea that they are going to issue a subpoena on don mcgahn to compel testimony in front of his committee. i have to tell you, having been a chairman, if i issued a subpoena on neil eggalston, then obama's general counsel the media would have laughed me off the planet there. would have been editorials about that. you don't have the ability to compel testimony from a general counsel to a president to appear before congress. >> you know, some applications of executive privilege are dubious. this ain't. >> right. >> thi

to take over the investigation the f.b.i. refused i repeated the request for an interview referring us to their website and the history of the boston office it can be found a very brief mention of the f.b.i. 990 investigation. the f.b.i. concluded that the tragedy was neither a criminal know what terrorist incident. this funding was not published until 2010 about 10 years after the crash yet the n.t.s.b. did not attract its report or reconsider its conclusions. it was clear. in whatever language there was a struggle going on in the cockpit of the 767 but how was there a struggle what all we had was a cat come back inside. what's happening what's happening and if you read the. rest of this struck script that has been the text recording. it well you'll see it. in flight 990 s last moments the captain returned to the flight deck and gave frantic instructions to his copilot. that night. that. he did. there's no evidence according to the that the the data that was issued by the n.t.s.b. to indicate that it was a struggle in the co

course it is quite it's quite strange that over now a number of people are missing and focused the f.b.i. and some of them are coming by some of them. and the city lost many space initially the number of people up when will the sub reach the number of 100 so that no one not 100 people among them will have to be done at least be and we have been for the johnson or even ready chief that they will see some piano as a kidnapping is becoming them a c.b.s. program in the country today is that we have an issue that has been courting the local media especially that security agent we've been a couple meant to the security and life for people in time but now because even over recent speaking one of the prominent government officials spoke in one else and that did it feel about islam it went missing some time and that the f.b.i. today went missing and then found it so did ok if they could call it that then i was missing and they were going to do a quote that is. that is by the police all this such kind of mistake. as to come in front and in court all were mistaken does this you know this guy ok as

to take over the investigation the f.b.i. refused i repeated request for an interview referring us to their website and the history of the boston office it can be found a very brief mention of the f.b.i. 990 investigation. the f.b.i. concluded that the tragedy was neither a criminal know what terrorist incident. this funding was not published until 2010 about 10 years after the crash yet the n.t.s.b. did not attract its report or reconsider its conclusions. it was clear. in whatever language there was a struggle going on in the cockpit of the 767 but how was there a struggle what all we had was a cat come back inside. what's happening what's happening and if you read the. rest of this struck script that has been the text recording. it well you'll see it. in flight 990 s last moments the captain returned to the flight deck and gave frantic instructions to his car. that night. that. he did. there's no evidence according to the that the the data that was issued by the n.t.s.b. to indicate that it was a struggle in the cockpit so

course it is quite it's quite strange that over now a number of people are missing and for that it's the f.b.i. and for some of them are coming by some of the quickest. and the city last minute i've been issued a number of people up when one that will disappear will reach the number of 100 so that no one not 100 people among them will have to be done at least be and we have been but i've been for the johnson or even chief that they will post some of the evidence that kidnapping is becoming them a c.b.s. program in the country to the extent that we had an issue that has been courting the local media specialist that security agents we've been account for men to the security and the like for people in time you know because even over recent days as the speaking one of that is permanent government officials spoke to him in one else and that did it still not islam it went missing some time and that the f.b.i. today went missing and then found that so to be ok if but they say that they then i was missing and they were going to do what productive. will that is the way that we saw this such kind of mis

you don't call the f.b.i. "oh, let me call the f.b.i." give me a break. ( laughter ) ( cheers and applause ) goo>> stephen: good to know. it's a public service. public service announcement. today, the president welcomed his newly confirmed defense secretary, mark esper, with a special ceremony at the pentagon, and the president gushed about esper's credentials: >> mark attended the united states military academy at west point, graduated in 1986. he was awarded the bronze star and the combat infantroopen badge. ( laughter ) >> stephen: "infantroopen?" that sounds like the name of a german police unit comprised of babies. ( laughter ) "deploy das infantroopen fur dem kinderblitz!" ( laughter ) ( applause ) i should stop. i don't want to give the president ideas. trump continued... or tried to: >> he has worked in both houses of congress, advising larmarkers. ( laughter ) >> stephen: he's probably just tired from being up all night gloating about mueller's bad reviews, but if i were you mr. president, i wouldn't celebrate too early. remember

their credit scores accessed and somebody has been arrested correct yes that's right on monday the f.b.i. raided the home of a 33 year old woman her name is paige thompson although some people would know her as erratic that's the name that she uses on the internet and in software developing circles they raided a home they found devices that they searched through days devices and on them they found documents that related to capital one and indeed other companies which the f.b.i. is now looking into whether they were potential targets or maybe they've already being targets and they just don't know about it yet so she has already appeared in court she appeared in court today she's been remanded into custody she will remain in prison until thursday when she appear in court again she's been charged with. to fraud and abuse what has capital once reaction been to this attack well it shocked it's a very big organization is the 7th biggest commercial bank in the united states it says that it doesn't believe that these details have been used to commit any fraud but it's still looking into that it'

to take over the investigation the f.b.i. refused i repeated request for an interview referring us to their website and the history of the boston office it can be found a very brief mention of the f.b.i. 990 investigation. the f.b.i. concluded that the tragedy was neither a criminal know what terrorist incident. this funding was not published until 2010 about 10 years after the crash yet the n.t.s.b. did not attract its report or reconsider its conclusions. but it was clear. in whatever language there was a struggle going on in the cockpit of the $76.00 but how was there a struggle what all we had was a cat come back inside. what's happening what's happening and if you read the. rest of this struck script that has been the text recording. it well you'll see it. in flight 990 s last moments the captain returned to the flight deck and gave frantic instructions to his copilot. that night. that. he did. there's no evidence according to the that the the data that was issued by the n.t.s.b. to indicate that it was a struggle in the

to take over the investigation the f.b.i. refused i repeated the request for an interview referring us to their website and the history of the boston office it can be found a very brief mention of the f.b.i. 990 investigation. the f.b.i. concluded that the tragedy was neither a criminal know what terrorist incident. this funding was not published until 2010 about 10 years after the crash yet the n.t.s.b. did not attract its report or reconsider its conclusions. it was clear. in whatever language there was a struggle going on in the cockpit of the 767 but how was there a struggle what all we had was a cat come back inside. what's happening what's happening and if you read the. rest of this struck script that has been the text recording. it well you'll see it. in flight 990 s last moments the captain returned to the flight deck and gave frantic instructions to his car. that night. that. he did. there's no evidence according to the that the the data that was issued by the n.t.s.b. to indicate that it was a struggle in the cockpi

to take over the investigation the f.b.i. refused i repeated request for an interview referring us to their website and the history of the boston office it can be found a very brief mention of the f.b.i. 990 investigation. the f.b.i. concluded that the tragedy was neither a criminal know what terrorist incident. this funding was not published until 2010 about 10 years after the crash yet the n.t.s.b. did not attract its report or reconsider its conclusions. it was clear. in whatever language there was a struggle going on in the cockpit of the 767 but how was there a struggle what all we had was a cat come back inside. what's happening what's happening and if you read the. rest of this struck script that has been the text recording. it well you'll see it. in flight 990 s last moments the captain returned to the flight deck and gave frantic instructions to his copilot. that night. that. he did. there's no evidence according to the that the the data that was issued by the n.t.s.b. to indicate that it was a struggle in the cockpi

and the f.b.i., obama's f.b.i. hid the exculpatory evidence that this was opposition research. that is a crime! gregg nailed it. it's an absolute crime, abuse of power. this is when the house of cards begins to crumble for the democrats and obama's former flunkies including clapper and including brennan. >> this is why it's so important what the inspector general is doing and what the attorney general barr is doing and certainly what mr. durham the prosecutor is doing in this. i want to talk about the other part of what catherine herridge talked about. that is this idea that they are going to issue a subpoena on dononatpo mcgahn to compel testimony in front of his committee. iou have to tell you, having been a chairman, if i issued a subpoena on neil eggleston then obama's general counsel the media would have laughed me off the planet there. would have been editorials about that. you don't have the ability to compel testimony from a general counsel to a president to appear before congress. >> you know, some applications of executive privilege are dubious. this ain't. >> right.

here's what chuck schumer says he says the f.b.i. must look into this for national security and privacy risks because millions of americans have used it and it's owned by a russia based company that seems a bit alarmist to me but when it goes all the way to congress there's something there was it says right there users are forced to provide. irrevocable what access to their photos so if you have tried the app should you be concerned i guess there's no going back is there right i mean well what the company has responded i mean 1st of all anytime anything involves your picture you should be a little bit concerned whether it's a russian app or whether it's facebook right the company has responded they say look most photos are deleted from our servers of than a couple of days users can request to get rid of those photos if they want they can do that through the app and it claims no user data is transferred to russia in fact those servers are based in the us are not based in russia i mean look i think a lot of the problem here is people a

their credit scores accessed and somebody has been arrested correct yes that's right on monday the f.b.i. raided the home of a 33 year old woman her name is paige thompson although some people would know her as erratic that's the name that she uses on the internet and in software developing circles they raided a home they found devices that they searched through days devices and on them they found documents that related to capital one and indeed other companies which the f.b.i. is now looking into whether they were potential targets or maybe they've already been targets and they just don't know about it yet so she has already appeared in court she appeared in court today she's been remanded into custody she will remain in prison until thursday when she appear in court again she's been charged with. to fraud and abuse what has capital one's reaction been to this attack well it shocked it's a very big organization is the 7th biggest commercial bank in the united states it says that it doesn't believe that these details have been used to commit any fraud but it's still looking into that it'

the f.b.i. says thompson stole likely tens of millions of credit card applications from a05 to this year, applications shat held 140,000 social security numbers and approximately 80,000 bank account numbers. nhe government says she even bragged about it in a direct message to someone on twitter, saying, "i've basically strapped myself with a bomb vest, dropping capital one's dox, and admitting it." it's just the latest breech. the world's largest at yahoo! hit nearly three billion accounts over a three-year period. 2meec equifax, affecting some 147. an yr,arriott hotel customers fell victim with up to 383 million customer records accessed. two advocacy groups advised nsday that consumers simply freeze their credit to avoid becoming a fraud victim. adam garber with the public interest research group: k you know, 10 minutes to freeze your credit, saving hours hd hours of time and potentially thousands of dollars. >> reporter: but consumer protection expert chris peterson says that's not enough. >>

their credit scores accessed and somebody has been arrested correct yes that's right on monday the f.b.i. raided the home of a 33 year old woman her name is paige thompson although some people would know her as erratic that's the name that she uses on the internet and in software developing circles they raided a home they found devices that they searched through days devices and on them they found documents that related to capital one and indeed other companies which the f.b.i. is now looking into whether they were potential targets or maybe they've already been targets and they just don't know about to get so she has already appeared in court she appeared in court today she's been remanded into custody she will remain in prison until thursday when she appear in court again she's been charged with computer fraud and abuse what has capital once reaction to this attack well it shocked it's a very big organization is the 7th biggest commercial bank in the united states it says that it doesn't believe that these details have been used to commit any fraud but it's still looking into that it's

that indeed someone has managed to get in and get access to that data and they then report it to the f.b.i. now what we now know is that 106000000 people were affected by this hack that breaks down to roughly 100 in the united states and 6 in canada most of that data was given to capital one in the 1st place through credit card applications made between 252-9000 so over a very long period which is why we're dealing with such big numbers but the sort of details they were able to get phone numbers addresses e-mail addresses we've got income if the person included that 140000 people have now had their social security numbers compromised that's the number this used to keep track of your income during the course of your life and others have had that their credit score was accessed and somebody has been arrested correct yes that's right on monday the f.b.i. raided the home of a 33 year old woman her name is paige thompson although some people would know her as erratic that's the name that she uses on the internet and in software developing circles they raided a home they found devices that they