the one that made me crack up is the retired employees saying that this functionally dismantled blm. i want you to talk about some of the things he did with the institution and bureaucracy of government and how you plan on taking that on. >> i would say this, first off, i fundamentally think this strengthens blm, and i think it strengthens it considerably. and what i've been fascinated by his on my travels west, i normally go to blm offices on the road, and i've been shocked about how enthusiastic they are about this change. there are folks out there that see things differently. and my view is that is what makes america great on one hand. on the other hand, the probably haven't actually analyze the problem or come up with a solution, because if they had, i would write myself in the process of trying to figure out how to make a system perform much better. >> all right. i am taking a look here at our questions from the audience. and a lot of interest on greenland. [ laughter ] [ applause ] >> well, the beauty of greenland is they do have significant critical minerals, i'm aware of that

the idea of the blm trans-locating their people from washington back to where the land actually is, that is one of those positive elements that i think we can build in the process. ben: let's get specific, congressman. to lower the emissions, what is the republican plan? the warnings have been stark for years that climate change is a severe and grim threat locally. -- globally. what do you propose be done domestically? bill policy ise an overall approach to make sure we are not dependent on foreign sources for energy, so we don't go back to the bad old days of jimmy carter, when there were actually oil embargoes, and he was telling us to simply get used to being cold and in the dark. in addition to that, there are two ways to solve this problem. and the other side is not talking about both those ways. you can either prohibit emissions from going into the air in the first place or take them out of the air. it is called carbon sequestration. if we were actually active in carbon sequestration opportunities, we could use existing processes we have, especially on public land, to pull enough c

the idea of the blm trans-locating their people from washington to where the land is, that is a positive element that can build in the process. ben: let's get specific, congressman. to lower the omissions -- emissions, what is the republican plan? the warnings are start, what do you propose we done domestically? rep. bishop: a bill policy is to state an overall approach to make sure we are not dependent on foreign sources for energy so we don't go back to the bad old days of jimmy carter where there embargoes and he was telling us to get used to being cold and in the dark. there are two ways to solve this problem and the other side is not talking about both those ways. you can either prohibit emission or do carbon sequestration. if we were active in carbon sequestration opportunities, printed use existing processes we have, specially on public land to pull enough carbon out of the air to meet the paris accord standard in that alone. there are a whole lot of opportunities and what i am trying to say is, we not having a great dialogue on what the act -- options actually are. some people ar

question, with the blm location, we hear about during the slump? is it bringing people closer to the communities being affected, making for the have steak in the community, but i have been surprised how it has run into stiff opposition. i wanted to talk about the challenges you faced when you are doing some of these with the institution and bureaucracy and how you are planning on taking that on. thisrst off, i think and what i have been fascinated by is on my travels west, i normally go to blm offices when i'm on the road and have been shocked there are folks out there that see things differently, and my view is, that is what makes america great on one hand. on the other hand, they haven't analyzed the problem or come up with a solution, because if they had, i wouldn't find myself in the process of trying to figure out how to make a system perform much better. ost: i am taking a look at questions from the audience. and there is a lot of interest on greenland. [laughter] secretary bernhardt: the beauty of greenland is that you have significant miner

the idea of the blm trans-locating their people from washington back to where the land actually is, that is one of those positive elements that i think we can build in the process. ben: let's get specific, congressman. to lower the emissions, what is the republican plan? the warnings have been stark for years that climate change is a severe and grim threat locally. what do you propose be done domestically? rep. bishop: that bill posey is to, once again state an overall , approach to make sure we are not dependent on foreign sources for energy, so we don't go back to the bad old days of jimmy carter, when there were actually oil embargoes, and he was telling us to simply get used to being cold and in the dark. in addition to that, there are two ways to solve this problem. and the other side is not talking about both those ways. you can either prohibit emissions from going into the air in the first place or take them out of the air. it is called carbon sequestration. if we were actually active in carbon sequestration opportunities, we could use existing processes we have, especially on pub

and to privatize public education about the same time blm spending his whole career trying to transfer federal land how you treat him is how you treat the adolescent as you call them out on his behavior but you don't focus on it every day but you focus on everyday lives so let's be honest job growth has been slower under trump and obama so the deficit has gone up the number of insured has gone up bankruptcies and farms have gone up and then to point out what this man has done for this country and i respect and what it has done in the every day struggle. he said that he drain the swamp but he didn't he can do this over the next year and a half without making it all about donald trump. [applause] the people that i work with were not cheering they were saying wrap it up. so one last short story when i was elected in 2012 and i moved into the governor's residence the youngest in 40 years in montana my six-year-old son kicks the soccerball and those paintings are $250,000 that i said take him down. we have to live here. so the first time i would speak to all the members of the legislature i

horton was the assistant supervisor of surveys for the blm. mr. secrest is writing him a letter saying, i have made an application for an exam for a commission in the u.s. engineers officers reserve corps, respectfully, lloyd secrest. harmless enough. here's what i have done. i'm looking for a job. help me out. a few months later, we have a much longer letter from him to the same guy. if you notice the letterhead at the top, army and navy, ymca. this is dated 1918. he just kind of goes through a few things. "it's hard for me to give you my permanent address, because i am in the army. here is my company. here is my unit. here's where i am at currently, my civilian address." it's different than the last letter. he is giving all the information. he is basically following up. he is still looking for a job. really wants to go into the surveying service after the army. he closes that letter, "this army life could be worse, but i very much prefer surveying. very respectfully, private lloyd secrest." he really wants that job. when he's out of the service.

horton was the assistant supervisor of surveys for the blm. and mr. secrest is writing him a letter saying, i have made an application for an exam for a commission in the u.s. engineers officers reserve corps, respectfully, lloyd secrest. ok, harmless enough. here's what i have done. i'm looking for a job. help me out. a few months later, we have a much longer letter from him to the same guy. if you notice the letterhead at the top, army and navy, ymca. this is dated 1918. and he just kind of goes through a few things. "it's hard for me to give you my permanent address, because i am in the army. here is my company. here is my unit. here's where i am at currently, my civilian address." it's actually different than the last letter. but he is getting all this information here. and he is basically just following up. he is still looking for a job. really wants to go into the surveying service after the army. and he closes that letter, "this army life could be worse, but i very much prefer surveying. very respectfully, private lloyd secrest." all right, so

horton was the assistant supervisor of surveys for the blm. mr. secrest is writing him a letter saying, i have made an application for an exam for a commission in the u.s. engineers officers reserve corps, respectfully, lloyd secrest. harmless enough. here's what i have done. i'm looking for a job. help me out. a few months later, we have a much longer letter from him to the same guy. if you notice the letterhead at the top, army and navy, ymca. this is dated 1918. he just kind of goes through a few things. "it's hard for me to give you my permanent address, because i am in the army. here is my company. here is my unit. , here's where i am at currently, my civilian address." it's different than the last letter. he is giving all the information. he is basically following up. he is still looking for a job. really wants to go into the surveying service after the army. he closes that letter, "this army life could be worse, but i very much prefer surveying. very respectfully, private lloyd secrest." he really wants that job. when he's out of the servic