naive about the united states i lived in the us for 30 years of follow the united states for the past 40 years so i know what i probably misread many of your interviews you stressed that economic benefits is one of the tenets of this deal economic benefits economic benefits are one of the tenets of the deed and the deed actually rests on 2 pillars not nonproliferation and normalization of economic relations but that does not require where united out the american participation ended with active american counteraction khania gadd the economic benefits of they still not all of the economic benefits but i believe that the international community will have to come to its senses that unless they stop this trend then the next week terms will be others we have other options we are least dependent you know into. 1008 we suffered the least from economic from the global economic crash because we fortunately or unfortunately have been. basically alienated from global economy so we are motto is a resilient economy that can withstand pressures from outside we have been the subject of pressure for 4

states i'm in favor of the united states with drawing from afghanistan but interestingly i guess i'm not in favor of negotiating with the taliban i think that the negotiations or indeed of course this is a group we have no you central trust in the agenda it's all over the table well for example oh we're pushing the notion that the trial is being should co-exist peacefully with the government but we're making all sorts of stipulations about human rights in that country none of those things are going to happen i think that the united states should talk to the tower and say if we're all were and say look we're leaving the country but if your country again is used as a safe even try to launch attacks against us we might return yeah we're going to go to max i think i said max that is based on that basically the deal but that's not that's basically the deal ok i mean the taliban are to keep isis and al qaeda out and if they don't they will suffer the consequences when we go back to daniel i mean after 20 and 18 years of the american involvement in its allies and then the decade but 2 decad

been prepared to lead us to the united states, we don't. that's not our way. we pull our weight. like you, our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor are found in our willingness to stand for what we believe. we believe, as teddy roosevelt declared that national strength is found in the ability of citizens to live out their lives with self-restraint, mastery, common sense, the power of accepting individual responsibility and the ability to act in conjunction with others and with courage and resolution. we believe in the capacity of enterprise and free markets to create wealth and to list all for free and fair trade to bring nations closer together. we believe that governments derive their power from the consent of the governed and that the ballot box and democracy is the surest foundation for peace and security. and we believe in the rule of law and freedom of association. these beliefs spurred this country to build a mighty canal, to stand up to fascism and militaryism and rebuild the world. inspired the fascination, wonder and joy of th

the united states lost 60,000 entereds after china the wto. this is happening to other countries all over the globe. the wto needs drastic change. the second largest economy in the world should not be permitted to declare itself a developing country in order to game the system that others' -- at others' expense. for years, these abuses were tolerated. ignored or even encouraged. globalism exerted a religious pull over past leaders, causing them to ignore their own national interest. but as far as america is concerned, those days are over. to confront these unfair practices, i placed massive tariffs on more than $500 billion worth of chinese-made goods. already, as a result of these tariffs, supply chains are relocating back to america and to other nations and billions of dollars are being paid to our treasury. the american people are absolutely committed to restoring balance to our relationship with china. hopefully we can reach an agreement that would be beneficial for both countries. but as i have made very clear, i will not accept a bad dea

states for the duration of immigration proceedings which take place in the united states. the government of mexico has agreed to provide them while they were were waiting in mexico we put appropriate humanitarian protections for the duration of the state. here were a couple of key points mpp, it discourages the abuse and exportation of us laws and non- meritorious or false asylum flames. mpp also helps promote a safer and more orderly process among the southwest border. bring up the limited resources and helps free up time of those in permitting this process to the boat to migrants who may legitimately have a merit-based claim. september 1st, of this year cdp has returned more than 42000 individuals to mexico under the mpp. let me emphasize the point that i made to a minute ago. even though mexico has stepped up unprecedented, they had a joint united states as well as our northern ramp both partners. they have really stepped up to true partners and we were staying this is the regional crisis and they have stepped up and unprecedented ways. we need them to do more. we need

states or from the united states of america? >> i would say that if others were willing to step up and support, they might be able to get there. >> but they are not. we're there. and so i think you've said it would be difficult for ukraine to meet that goal of defending themselves without our support. correct? >> i would say it would be a challenge, yes, congresswoman. >> this complaint outlines a scheme by the president of the united states and i'm not sure what to call rudy giuliani these days, what his role is. maybe he's the new fixer, i'm not sure. but either way, it involves a scheme to coerce ukraine, this country that you say is so very dependant on the united states to defend themselves to coerce ukraine into assisting the president's re-elections efforts in 2020. and the report from your inspector general, the memo that was sent to you, it says on july 18th, the office of management and budget official informed the departments and agencies that the president earlier that month had issued instructions to suspend all u.s

the united states does not seek conflict with any other nation . we desire peace, cooperation and mutual gain when all. but i will never fail to defend america's interests. one of the greatest security threats facing peaceloving nations today is the repressive regime in iran. the regime's record of death and destruction is well-known to us all. not only is iran world's number one state sponsor of terrorism , iran's leaders are fueling the tragic wars in both syria and yemen. at the same time, the regime is squandering the nation's wealth and future in a fanatical quest for nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them. we must never allow this to happen. to stop iran's path to nuclear weapons and missiles, i withdrew the unitedstates from the terrible iran nuclear deal . which has very little time remaining, did not allow inspection of important sites . and it did not cover ballistic missiles. following our withdrawal, we have implemented severe economic sanctions on the country. hoping to free itself from sanctions, the regime has escalated its vi

against the united states. we are fighting different wars even if it's the same where we have different challenges. i'm happy to go into that in the question and answers. because deterrence required both capabilities and resolve if we have a balance of abilities, that means we don't have a deterrent. china is much more resolved. they are willing to accept higher costs in the united states and most contingencies and therefore maintain deterrence the united states actually has to have better capabilities so we would suffer less than china would. there is a difference in how to assess trends in the future. china has surpassed the united states, given certain trends in the region china will soon be able to out match the united states. as we know on the global stage china is nowhere near being a peer competitor to the united states. i have a number of recommendations in my testimony, most focus on the south china sea issue which is i think the key area of strategic competition on the military side between the two si

jr., united states navy. captain robert e dolan jr., united states navy. commander william h donovan, united states navy. lieutenant commander charles draws the third, united states navy retired. commander patrick done, united states navy. petty officer first-class edward t ehrhardt, u.s. navy. barbara g edwards. lieutenant commander robert r nelson, united states navy reserve. charles s falkenberg. and his wife, leslie a whittington. and their two children, dana and zoe falkenberg. petty officer 3rd class jamie l fallon, united states navy. jay joseph ferguson. amelia v fields. gerald p fisher. flag andhe flag -- e her husband, rear admiral will wilson f flag, retired. petty officer second-class matthew m flock oh, united states navy. sandra and foster. lieutenant richard p gabriel, united states marine corps retired. captain lawrence d get straight, united states navy. gee.z brenda c gibson. colonel ronald f galinsky, united states army retired. gray. diane hail mckenzie. stanley r hall. carolyn b hellman. michelle m heidelberger. sheila ms heinz. petty

border security is vital to the united states. border security is vital to india, we understand that. [cheers and applause] and we are further taking up precedented -- unprecedented action to finally secure our southern border and stop illegal immigration. and i want to thank the president of mexico who right now has 27,000 soldiers on our southern border. it's been incredible, what's taken place in a short period of time. illegal immigration is deeply unfair to millions of wonderful legal immigrants who work hard, pay their taxes, follow our rules and obey our laws. yet there are those in washington who would raid your health care to front free benefits -- they want to fund free benefits to those who enter our country illegally. we don't want to do that. [applause] we don't want to do that. because if we don't do it, they won't come. i will never allow politicians to take away your health care or give it to illegal immigrants. my administration believes our first duty is to the highest loyalty of all. we must always be for the am

you got a complaint involving the president of the united states and also the united states attorney general. i disagree with some of the decisions you made, but i have no doubt whatsoever that the same sense of duty that you applied in your long and illustrious career guided you as you made these decisions. so thank you for that. but i want to ask a few questions about the extraordinary document that came to your attention. the dni has jurisdiction over foreign interference in our elections, correct? >> that's correct. >> and of course you're aware, as we all are, of the mueller report and his indictments against 12 foreign nationals, russians, who actively interf e interfered in our election, correct? >> i have read the report. >> so it's just a huge responsibility that your agency has, correct? and in this case, because of the two things you mentioned, that the president is the one person that's boabove the intelligence community and your sense of executive privilege, you did not forward the complaint to us, correct? >> i did not -- yes, congressman welch, because i was still work

jr., united states navy. captain robert e dolan jr., united states navy. commander william h donovan, united states navy. lieutenant commander charles draws the third, united states navy retired. commander patrick dunn, united states navy. petty officer first-class edward t ehrhardt, u.s. navy. barbara g edwards. lieutenant commander robert r nelson, united states navy reserve. charles s falkenberg. and his wife, leslie a whittington. and their two children, dana falkenberg and zoe falkenberg. petty officer 3rd class jamie l fallon, united states navy. jay joseph ferguson. amelia v fields. gerald p fisher. darlene e flag and her husband, rear admiral wilson f flag, retired. petty officer second-class matthew m flaco, united states navy. sandra and foster. first lieutenant richard p gabriel, united states marine corps retired. captain lawrence d getstred, united states navy. cortez gee. brenda c gibson. colonel ronald f galinsky, united states army retired. ian j gray. diane hail mckenzie. stanley r hall. carolyn b hellman. michelle m heidelberger. sheila m

states i am in favor of the united states with drawing from afghanistan but interestingly i guess i'm not in favor of negotiating with the taliban i think that the negotiations or indeed of course this is a group we have no you central trust in the agenda it's all over the table well for example oh we're pushing the notion that the should co-exist peacefully with the government but we're making all sorts of stipulations about human rights in that country none of those things are going to happen i think that the united states should talk to the tower and say if we're all going to work and say look we're leaving the country but if your country again is used as a safe even try to launch attacks against us we might return yeah we're going to go to max i think right now max that is basically that basically the deal but that's not that's basically the deal ok i mean the taliban are to keep isis and al qaeda out and if they don't they will suffer the consequences when we go back to daniel i mean after 20 and 18 years of the american involvement in its allies and then the decade but 2 decades

naive about the united states i lived in the us for 30 years of follow the united states for the past 40 years so i know what i'm probably missing many of your interviews you stress that economic benefits is one of the tenets of this deal the economic benefits economic benefits are one of the tenets of the deed and the deed actually rests on 2 pillars not nonproliferation and normalization of economic relations but that does not require where you laid out the american participation and with active american counteraction can you gather the economic benefits of this deal not all of the economic benefits but i believe that the international community will have to come to its senses that unless they stop this trend then the next week terms will be. others we have other options we are least dependent you know in 2008 we suffered the least from economic from the global economic it crushed out because we fortunately or unfortunately have been. basically alienated from global economy so we are motto is a resilient economy that can withstand pressures from outside we have been the subject of p

but we also need to have a conversation in the united to have a need conversation in the united states that our health care system is a disease care system. we wait until people get sick, then the pharmaceutical companies come in, the health companies come in, and they make a ton of money. if we are going to fix this issue in the united states, we need to move to a health care system that is based on prevention. [applause] rep. ryan: that is about the business of reversing chronic disease, which accounts for three quarters of the health care costs in the united states, where we use prevention of food as medicine to reverse things like type 2 diabetes in the united states. that is a modern, new health care system that uni come of that we can build together -- you and i, that we can build together. and if we are going to fix the climate, the issue of global warming, we need to move from a monopolized industrial agricultural system to a system based on regenerative backulture that puts money in the hands of the farmers of the united states of america. [applause] not left or right, a new a

the united states has done some things, interfering in other country's. there's no question about that. more recently, the united states is helping organizations how to run a campaign. it's found advisers to run. you cannot equate what the united states is doing with what russia is doing. >> right. something you mentioned, i would like you to talk more about, how the impeachment story might affect russia's aspirations with ukraine while the united states is distracted. >> that's a very interesting question. right now, the kremlin is happy with what's happening. russia is usually the one connected with the world corruption, or interference, or the election. et cetera. now it's ukraine. and ukraine and russia, are competing images for people in the former soviet union. would they like to be russia? or would they like to be a ukraine that is not corrupt. it damages ukraine and it helps russia, which can say, look. there's a country that you, united states, have been supporting and praise. they can stand back and watch the chaos unfold. they can make hay from

the policies of the united states. force and the reality is that international norms and regulations are not implemented as it should be so you cannot really rely that in fact you would be protected by the international organizations. which had been established to protect countries against the dominance of of major poverty the reality is that you should be powerful but we are not as some people believe we are not realizing that we would have nuclear weapons we don't see nuclear weapons as a protection against the country we think that we should be powerful economically we should be poverty food militarily and we should have a united unified position in the country itself so we think that this is the timing that we have a coalition a strong coalition between all forces all political forces in the country that we should resist against the policies of the united states and defend ourselves in a best manner you see britain the united states back israel ever more militarily with weapons and struck the international peace re

the united states can stand it -- can withstand it a lot more than the united states -- a lot more than china can get unite states is dependent on -- a lot more than china can. demands that go back to the obama administration, by the way. the problem they have here is they cannot concede and they have to stand and take it for as long as possible, which is why everything else they are doing is secondary. david: many people would disagree with you, george, when you said the u.s. is better equipped or in better shape than the chinese policymakers to deal with their own domestic economies. what makes you say that? george: the amount we derive from our trade and exports to china. exporter, 15%,y 18% of gdp comes from exports. the united states is a minimal exporter, 12%, over half of that coming from mexico and canada. we are not that dependent. it is a political season so everybody is going to blame the administration. the math is clear. the u.s. is not dependent on exports for its economy nearly as much as china is in most of our exports are local. rishaad: is it about that or is it about

states and china will keep the peace between the united states and china you all believe that you >> i might have a less popular view. >> i'm looking at what they have to develop, as far as isr and lived hold on. i think the ambitions are quite limited in terms of military. they still think they can largely rely on political and economic tools to protect their economic interests of on a broad. one situation, with the chinese military themselves, they have the capabilities to blockade us allies and partners. a mutual vulnerability could protect them in conflict and they could protect maritime interests. japan can no longer give anything if china controls those waters. the strategy for them is more limited. but my personal view is china was more ambitious than they are i think that's how the united states wins this. we are trying to project interests all over the world china can use a defense budget for a small area that is close to home. if this were more like the cold war, i think the united states perseveres. i'm not as concerned about the desire to push out the on the pacific. i th

of the united states to israel and if netanyahu is. to be over i suspect that the american men who are working very close closely with not only are all played a big role in giving that any all the free gifts that trump administration gave them so if not then how is is do we oversaw the men who worked with him very closely in the united states most likely will be you know joining him will try and get a green light cushion and of course the israeli ambassador to london who has not time to come on the show thank you very much ambassador. after the break as hearings continue in guantanamo we go to walk about cuba to ask the lawyer of alleged $911.00 mastermind khalid sheikh muhammad whether the u.s. deep state is doing all it can to prevent this prosecution all the smoke going up about to him going on the ground. the world is driven by shaped by one person. who dares thinks. we dare to ask. they all see themselves as dying swans in their dreams. but only one in a 1000 will ever make it to the top. they're ready to give their lives for the

and we know that united states pull out. and when they pull out, they say why they want to pull out. and i think with the iranians and with their policy -- and we are talking about intelligent people in iran dealing in this matter -- it should be done differently. i think if there is worries with the united states and the ream about some of the points in this agreement, they node to extend -- they need to extend it for a few years. i think that a different approach to the iranians than the approach taken now. maria: give us -- let's put this down. you are not the prime minister of qatar anymore. >> yes. maria: but from your stance in terms of the qatari position with the united states, the qatari position throughout the middle east, what is your stance right now on the united states? >> well, as you know, we always historically have good relation with the united states. and there is some time when there is a lot of, a lot of mistakes or a lot of wrong information being given to the united states as you say about the islamic

has been prepared to leave it to the united states. we don't. that is not our way. we pull our weight. our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor are found in willingness to stand for what we believe. we believe anthony roosevelt declared the national strength is found in the ability of citizens to live out their lives with self-restraint, common sense, the power of accepting individual responsibility and the ability to act in conjunction with others, courage and resolution. we believe in the capacity of enterprise, free markets, for free and fair trade between nations together. we believe governments derive their power from the consent of the governed, the ballot box and democracy. and and these beliefs spurred this country, to rebuild the modern world. inspired the fascination, wonder and joy of the world's children through a little mouse who could whistle a tune. we took humanity to the moon and we are going back again. tore down a wall that separated liberty from oppression and engineered and built a digital world that has connec

this is the president of the united states involving the united states justice department, the government in this conversation. that is where democrats are going to say it's abuse of power. >> adam schiff there used the word depravity when talking about that aspect of this. if you're the democrats, you think this is very easy to understand. you see this phone call, adam schiff saying it was much more damage thing than he thought it would be when it came out. you hear him using phrases like reciprocity and then going into the favor. at this point in terms of where the public is in terms of impeachment, it's about 37%. it's been as high as 41%. for clinton, it was never higher than 30%. democrats aren't fully on board with impeachment. about a fifth are not where the house is right now in terms of full bore impeachment. so far they haven't been so convincing, democrats in bringing the public along. but they sure have fallen in line. if you look at the beginning of the week it was 137 or something like that and it's almost 200 now. >> we're going to take a quick break. we're waiting for chuc

we reflect on what it means to be a citizen of the united states of america. as part of the celebration, we welcome thousands of new u.s. citizens just like you and special naturalization ceremonies across the country. perhaps not as special as this one. in the process of becoming a united states citizen, you earned our nation's history, you studied our form of government, founding documents and the freedoms that we share because of the actions are founders took to secure the blessings of liberty for all americans. now as citizens of the great country, american history is your history. today in taking the oath of allegiance to support and defend the constitution and laws of the united states of america, you have gained important new rights and responsibilities along with ownership of america's future. i hope this day inspires you to fully exercise the rights we meet the responsibilities that accompany as united states citizens. i encourage each of you to be active and engaged citizens and members of your community. cast your vote during election, serve on a ju

naive about the united states i lived in the us for 30 years of follow the united states for the past 40 years so i know what i probably misread many of your interviews you stress that economic benefits is one of the tenets of this deal the economic benefits economic benefits are one of the tenets of the deed and the deed actually rests on 2 pillars not nonproliferation and normalization of economic relations but that does not require where you write out the american participation and with active american counteraction can you gather the economic benefits of this deal not all of the economic benefits but i believe that the international community will have to come to its senses that unless they stop this trend then the next week terms will be. others we have other options we are least dependent you know in 2008 we suffered the least from economic from the global economic crash now because we fortunately or unfortunately have been. basically alienated from global economy so we are motto is a resilient economy that can withstand pressures from outside we have been the subject of pressur

process an enemy of the united states? of course. that's obvious on its face. those who would encourage a nation to be engaged in our sspolitical process and try to p the scales one way or another are they enemies of the united states? well, they're not acting consistent with that constitutional principle. emis seems like pretty straightforward traditional interpretation could you don't need a phd or a law degree to understand that if a foreign country tries to interfere in the united states election process that foreign countries nand enemy and those who would encourage a foreign country or foreign agents -- >> the senate has been in their weekly party meetings are gaveling back into session to vote on confirming the drums nominees. colleagues, something that a lot of these senators are talking about more recently and not too soon the mexico-canada agreement with the united states, a very important trade agreement. president trump and the leaders of mexico and canada signed the usmca on november 30, 2018, which was 43 wee

you have a complaint involving the president of the united states and also the united states attorney general. i disagree with some decisions you made, but i have no doubt whatsoever that the same sense of duty that you applied in your illustrious career guided you as you made these decisions. thank you for that. i want to ask a few questions about the extraordinary document that aim to your attention -- that came to your attention. the dni has jurisdiction over foreign interference in our elections, correct? correct.maguire: welch: and you are aware of the mueller report on the russians that interfered in our elections, correct? director maguire: i have read the report. representative welch: it's a huge responsibility your agency has. in this case, because of the two things you mentioned, that the president is the one person that is about the intelligence community, and your sense about executive privilege, you did not forward the complaint to us, correct? director maguire: yes, congressman welch, because i was still working with the white house. representative congressman welch -- r

you came here to the united states as a refugee. you are deeply involved with the climate movement right now. president trump is a crowd climate -- proud, change denier. >> i was born in united states, but my parents were immigrants from somalia. i would say especially talking about the climate justice movement and climate change that our president really needs to act for us and act for the people being affected. we need presidents and lawmakers that are interested in really making change for people that are directly affected, and notot doing money laundering for people in power. amy: and your messagege to the as one of thecome most powerful people on earth, occupying the presidency of the united states, has called climate change a chinese hoax? trump,, so president your actions are actually harming people stop millions of people across this country are being impacted by the inaction you are not taking. and as young people are not going to stand down and allow this inaction to continue. we will continue to be on the streets until we

the united states. there will be many here who will desire to minimize the impact on afghan women, preserve the protections for afghan women. that at the end of the day the decision-making will be fundamentally about other issues related to the security of the united states, and not considerations for women. i don't have time to address sean's comments but a question i will address briefly, a difficult question to answer because both sides, particularly the taliban are not going to this negotiation if this negotiation already develops platforms. unlike other piece processes around the world. the zone of the possible is going to have to emerge as negotiations develop and the position has developed. the chances that pakistan stopping, well. i think the more important point is if the united states withdraws from afghanistan, starts to withdraw, the chances of pakistan ramping up its relationship with the taliban. >> laura bush never gave such a speech before 9/11. if the united states were going to invade

there are a lot of pressures in the united states at the time, not very many privy to these pressures and he had to face those headlines and he was constantly pressing the system when nativism into this huge movement could keep us out of the entanglements led by demagogues like a lindbergh and those were forces he had to contend with many of which were tinged with darrell and anti-feminism and he tried to resist that and to try to allow specialty jewish refugees into the united states and especially children. children. it didn'didn't always succeed ot as forcefully as maybe we would have liked in retrospect but this is a portrait of his efforts and the difficulties faced at the time and well-done by the topic that's always going to be a very sensitive one in terms of our history. that is sort of my account of what i've been reading lately. >> we want to hear what you are reading. send your list on facebook, twitter and tv. good afternoon -- [applause] a

states and the united states has shown nothing for all its presence in the region they the united states is only creating instability and you will believe you me that if the war in iraq there had to be all morning outside well you do want to come to that house and he said well i'm not going to have to stop you there this is a once again all about the politics of this is sanctions it's about the regional players saudi arabia it's about iran it's about the u.s. role saudi arabia seems to be reliant on the u.s. often it's been said that saudi arabia will fight anymore and he will to the last american is not a bad policy is that a failed. should things change for saudi arabia well saudi arabia the house of saud they're not getting much sleep these days because they were hoping that donald trump would be their savior so they're in a state of shock right now that on 2 occasions when trump had the opportunity to strike at iran that they haven't so there's going to be a lot of soul searching in saudi arabia about his relationship with the united states i don't think they have many good options b

well of course the united states and iran sami have not had any sort of diplomatic ties for about 40 years now the swiss embassy acts as a go between for those 2 countries and in a letter a very strongly worded letter to the united states iran made it clear that it was not involved in the attack on saudi aramco facilities last week which who the rebel fighters claimed and what they also said is that they condemned the allegation by american officials that iran had anything to do with it now iranian leaders in this letter also said that if the attack on the radical facilities which would be used as an excuse to launch any sort of attack on iran then retaliation would be immediate and iranian military would not limit themselves to simply the source of any potential attack on its targets now this is standing policy and what it means is that iran every time anything like this happens any time there's an uptick intentions iran reminds the united states and its allies in the region that any attack against iran will make will will be a course for all out conflict in iran will then retaliate

major events in the united is one of 15lo cities to host a world's fair in the united states. the next world's fair is going to be -- anyone know? probably not. the united states is not slated to participate in that world's fair. it was a big deal for buffalo to host the world's fair. margaret, talk about that. buffalo at mean for that time to host the world's fair. so buffalo was a big deal at the turn-of-the-century. we are seeing that same type of optimism now, but it was very proud of its accomplishments and its state-of-the-art the finest asphalt streets in the country, electric streetcars, electric lights. , 300 50,000 people at the turn-of-the-century. it had fathered two presidents and it had big dreams. one of the things that hope to do was to become bigger and raise its profile, so one of the ways that cities do this is to host a huge exposition, and buffalo had big ideas that it's pan-american exhibition would be even more grand than the world spare the took place in chicago 1893. so. mark: electricity was still new and played a big part. the fairalk about how looke

states because the united states of let's not forget is the biggest donor of the afghan government it has been its remained so it has been the biggest donor to the military expenditure and it has been at the forefront of supporting the afghan security forces fighting the taliban with the drone operations and all of this so of course all of these regional equiv rim's are important but the americans central remains and i just listened very well for her on the early. if i can make a quick clip quick version if you please very briefly. yeah i just wanted to say i just wanted to say that what regards to what happens the day after the peace deal what with all due respect i think nobody really knows even the taliban have not had had the opportunity to to i think think about this in the i'm going to lead certainly don't know what happens the following day and because we don't know what happens after the deal is signed this deal with the united states and the between the isis and the taliban or even the final agreement you know there is not a lot of anticipation about the clarity of how americ

the united states, though, accuses iran. a u.s. source with knowledge of the incident says the attack may have been launched from inside iraq. here's more of what we know. iran-backed houthi militants in yemen have claimed responsibility. they used 10 drones to carry out the strikes. u.s. secretary of state mike pompeo rejects that and says there is no evidence the strikes came from yemen. on twitter he said that iran is responsible but offered no evidence. iran's foreign ministry is dismissing the allegations altogether. regardless of who is responsible, the attacks have crippled saudi oil production. the kingdom's capacity has been cut roughly by half. with a look at what we can expect right now with the markets, let's bring in our emerging markets editor john in abu dhabi. john, to get a sense, and also we have nick paton walsh live in tehran. nick, let's start with you. the united states blaming iran despite houthi rebels claiming responsibility. what reaction are you hearing there? >> reporter: well, in the last hours or so we

8000000 united states dollars. in the amount of $10500.00 mortar shells how they were then exported how they were . transported to the middle east are now there and ended up in the hands of isis and we challenge her on her confidence in these findings if. there are one or. then where. either or are the claims you've made extremely damaging of course is true for the u.s. government that based on these documents that you got ahold of how hard was it to get them and how certain are you that they are genuine. i was there i have had from the beginning of this. i don't know for the people or of the world some will send this word or was i 85 and i verify and you. are of course this they are of thanks in the shipping government. and on the labor . market or show this there is the name of the company are there for the us government or birth to birth the weapons on behalf of the arm and there is also the shipping of that so it's not a 0 to track. kids like he back to the us government also there is indication that informatio

states, the president calling for a free trade relationship between brazil, and the united states. i sat down with brazilian foreign minister to talk about the possibilities that president trump has put forward and he and president shared vision for the two countries. >> we're joined now by the foreign minister of brazil is ernesto great to have you with us and welcome to fox business. we want to start with first the relationship between the united states and brazil. the two largest countries in this hemisphere. it's an extraordinary opportunity the president says he wants to see a strong significant relationship with brazil your thoughts. >> great to be here, lou. that's a moment to build the relationship we always wanted to all we wanted to do to the united states, brazil and for a long had time denied that possibility. they assumed it anti-american and the natural thing was to have a trump partnership. our diplomatic tradition, the good diplomatic tradition is that brazil wants to be the player in the world and for that, you need a strong relationship with the united states or w

naive about the united states i've lived in the us for 30 years of followed the united states for the past 40 years so i know what i'm probably missing many of your interviews you stress that economic benefits is one of the tenets of this deal the economic benefits economic benefits are one of the tenets of the deed and the deed actually rests on 2 pillars not nonproliferation and normalization of economic relations but that does not require where united out the american participation ended with active american counteraction khania gadd the economic benefits of this deal not all of the economic benefits but i believe that the international community will have to come to its senses that unless they stop this trend then the next week terms will be others we have other options we are least dependent you know in 2008 we suffered the least from economic from the global economic crash because we fortunately or unfortunately have been. basically alienated from global economy so we are multiple. it is a resilient economy that can withstand pressures from outside we have been the subject of pr

iran has lived without the united states for 40 years iran has lived in spite of the united states for 40 years in order to remove security council resolutions the presence of the 5 permanent members of the security council required so we were not eager to negotiate with the united states it was a necessity once. that. objective was achieved for us the presence of the united states was not a major plus as you said from the very beginning even during the obama administration the united states was more interested in keeping the sanctions that it had not lifted than observing its obligations to lift the sanctions so this has been the case and we were never we were never. naive about the united states i've lived in the us for 30 years of follow the united states for the past 40 years so i know what i probably misread many of your interviews you stress that economic benefits is one of the tenets of the stealthy economic benefits economic benefits are one of the tenets of the deed and the deed actually rests on 2 pillars not nonproliferation and normalization of economic relations but that d

the united states. we also need to have a conversation in the united states that our health care system is a disease care system. we wait until people get sick and then the pharmaceutical companies come in, the health companies come in, and they make a ton of money. if we are going to fix this issue in the united states, we need to move to a health care system that is based on prevention. [applause] business oft the reversing chronic disease, which accounts for three quarters of the health care costs in the united states, where we use prevention, we use food as medicine to reverse things like type two diabetes in the united states. that is a modern, new health care system that we can build together. [applause] and if we are going to fix climate, if we are going to fix the issue of global warming, we need to move from a monopolized industrial agriculture system to a system based on regenerative agriculture that sequesters carbon and can put money back in the hands of the farmers of the united states of a

states or who have been radicalized or attempting to leave the united states to join terrorist organizations. that would help identify if there are deficiencies in the system and do what we can to make sure we are protect the american people. we must remain vigilant. while we have not had an attack on american soil in many years we've seen the resurgence of al qaeda. the organization carried out these attacks. we see they are reorganizing and continuing to grow, that they now have approximately 40,000 members worldwide as a part of the organization. they have not turn themselves. cyber techs that occur against our country from any location around the globe we must make sure we are prepared to handle things such as a biological attack, the organization in any of our major metropolitan cities , that would have been biological in nature and we must remain vigilant each and every day even though we have been very blessed. >> to training exercise go to read described and looking on all of those things. >> one, as we would determine and make sure and as part of the exercise we make sure that we wi

for this reason the united states has taken steps to better screen. foreign technology and investments and to protect our data and our security. we're each every nation president to do this a. freedom and democracy must. be constantly guarded in protected or at the broad and from within. we must always be skeptical of those who want conformity and control. even in free nations we see alarming signs and new challenges to liberty. a small number of social media platforms are acquiring immense power. over what we can see and over what we are allowed to say. a permanent political class is openly distain full. dismissive and defiant of the will of the people a faceless bureaucracy operates in secret and weekends. democratic rule. media and academic institutions push flat out assaults on our histories traditions and values. in the united states my administration has made clear through social media companies that we will uphold the right of free speech a free society cannot allow. social media giants to silence the voices of the people and a free people was

sablan of guam to be united states marshal for the district of guam and concurrently united states marshal for the district of the mariana islands. mr. mcconnell: i ask consent the senate vote on the nominations en bloc with no intervening action or debate, that if confirmed, the motions to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table en bloc, that the president be immediately notified of the senate's action, that no further motions be in order, and that any statements related to the nominations be printed in the record. the presiding officer: without objection. the question is on the nominations en bloc. all in favor say aye. all opposed no. the ayes appear to have it. the ayes do have it. the nominations are confirmed en bloc. mr. mcconnell: i ask unanimous consent the senate proceed to consideration of the following nomination -- executive calendar 423. the presiding officer: without objection. the clerk: department of defense, brian mccarthy of illinois to be secretary of the army. mr. mcconnell: i ask consent the senate vote on the nomination with no intervening action or deb

every country needs something from the united states, especially the ukraine. when that call took place on july 25th of this year, ukraine wanted three things specifically from us. they needed that $250 million in aid that had been suspended under review twehe week before. for months they were seeking an oval office meeting between the ukraine president who was elected in april, months before july, and who had yet to get it. even though president trump's top advisers were advocating for an oval office meeting, president trump for some reason pushed back on that. third, they needed the show of solidarity. the ukrainians need us more than most countries need us because they are vulnerable. they have been violated by the russians. they need this show of alliance and a united force. so there isn't a country that doesn't need something from us, and ukraine needs more than most countries do from us. >> i want to read a quote from a former senior administration official in "the washington post." whenever i see former senior administration official these days, i think

>> and here in the united states, 50,000 general motors workers are now on strike. we'll be live in detroit to find out what is happening behind the nationwide standoff. >>> and also the maker he of oxycontin is filing for bankruptcy protection. what it means for the thousands of lawsuits against purdue phrma and the founding family the sacklers. >>> and climate change is a threat to our national security and we'll hear from al roker on his reporting from the glaciers of green land. but oil prices have spiked after drone attacks on saudi arabia's oil facilities which could mean likely will mean higher prices at the pump. the attacks on saturday knocked out more than 5 million barrels of daily crude production. that is half of saudi arabia's daily export capacity. that caused brent crude futures to jump more than 19% at the open today. that is the biggest jump in history. almost $72 a barrel. take a look at west texas intermediate, this is light sweet crude which we use in the united states, different from brent crude which is the global standard. but our oil prices

i'm stating it as a policy reality in the united states. there will be many here who will desire to minimize the impact on afghan women, preserve the protections for afghan women. at the end of the day, the decision-making will be fundamentally about other issues related to this security of the united states and not considerations related to women. i'm sorry, i don't really have time to address sean's comment but i would just say very briefly that, it's a difficult question to answer in large part because both sides but more particularly the taliban are not going into this negotiation, if this negotiation happens. we've already developed political platforms unlike other peace process around the world . the zone of the possible is going to have to emerge as the negotiations develop in the positions as they develop, confront each other. and chances of pakistan stopping, well slim. but, i think the more important point is if the united states simply withdrawals from afghanistan, starts to withdraw, abandons the peace process, the chances of pa