states and united states. should change they are region that they cannot. support the coup at counters that by providing. allegations. unites its debts should be a result united states result that you should be greece united not ikea's together with the clinton administration and also united states also all the problems we spain you know that spain also want to buy and use if they will who at them sent the precious the us to fight and i don't mean to interrupt it's just that i'm going to come back to some of this in a bit i want to get a question in to fabrice there for bruce i want to try to take a step back for a moment could you explain to our viewers what exactly the s. 400 system does and why it causes this level of concern right now. well basically it brings a highly sophisticated russian refinery system into turkey's territorial defense and the problem here is that since 2010 nato is building a nato wide and timi size system must be reliant on the american patry out systems . and then the problem is if

and here in the united states the united states has to work both within our country and also with other countries to bring it to a close hopefully with the arrival of it back seen if that happens in 2021 and the dispersal and distribution of that vaccine around the world and around the united states trying to climb out of the global recession that has been so injurious to so many americans whoever's elected and i hope is going to be vice president biden is going to have perhaps the most difficult global agenda that any president has faced since the 1930 s. global a national agenda i should say since franklin up wrote eleanor roosevelt was elected in 1932 but joe biden's up to it and he's going to have a lot of support in the country to be an activist president who tries to heal the country and unite has to combat these these major concerns how do you make that case to americans that feel that they fought in iraq they fought in afghanistan they fought in korea they fought in vietnam you know generations of military families who feel after financial crises and you know sort of tough times

iran continued to sell oil to the united states. i believe that it's in our interest and in the interest of israel and iran, and saudi arabia, for the united states to sell arms to those countries. it's for their security as well as ours. ms. frederick: mr. valeriani, a question for president ford. mr. valeriani: mr. president, the policy of your administration is to normalize relations with mainland china. and that means establishing at some point full diplomatic relations and obviously doing something about the mutual defense treaty with taiwan. if you are elected, will you move to establish full diplomatic relations with peking, and will you abrogate the mutual defense treaty with taiwan? and, as a corollary, would you provide mainland china with military equipment if the chinese were to ask for it? mr. ford: our relationship with the people's republic of china is based upon the shanghai communique, of 1972, and that communique, calls for the normalization of relations between the united states and the people's republic. it doesn

. >> the president of the united states! >> mister chairman, delegates to this convention, my fellow americans, four years a

united states. i look at cuba, 90 miles off the coast of united states. in 1957, i was in havana. i talked to the american ambassador there. he said he was the second most powerful man in cuba. and even though ambassador smith and ambassador gardner, both are public and ambassadors, both -- both are republican ambassadors, both castro and marxist influences, both of them have testified that in spite of their warnings to the american government, nothing was done. our security depends on latin america. any american looking at the situation in latin america pekin -- feel content with what is going on today -- content with what is going on today? in order to pick up the support of the castro supporters in brazil? at the american conference the summer, when we wanted them to join together in the denunciation of castro and the cuban communist, we couldn't even get the inter-american group to join together in denouncing castro. it was rather a vague statement they made. today, the russians broadcast 10 tim

the united states senate. the united states senate is where there will be a decision on whether we put on the floor at dell that my brother cory booker from new jersey and i wrote called the justice and policing act. a bill that says like joe biden and i say we should ban chokehold and carotid holds because george floyd would be alive today if i were the case in the bill that says let's have a national registry for people who break the law because that is the right thing to do and we can't have folks get fired one place and not get hired someplace else. we need to have a national standard for excessive use of force because it's not right that in some places when their successive use of force the question asked is was a reasonable when we all know you can reason away just about anything. the more fair and just question to ask is what is necessary? we need to change the standard. those kinds of decisions if they get made from the white house and we will make them it also gets made in the senate. that rings me to

is now an apology united states. secondly the economic growth of the soviet union is greater than us is dollars adjusted from two to three times as great as this is a great effect on the underdeveloped world problems of low income and population density and inadequate resources a gallup poll taken in february. asked people in ten countries. which country they thought would be first in one hundred seventy. both scientifically and militarily. and a majority in every country except that it would be the soviet union by nine hundred seventy votes at the u.n. particularly the vote dealing with red china. saturday. we receive the support on the position that we had taken of only two african countries. liberia. more than a century in the other union of south africa which is not a popular country in africa. every other african country either abstain or voted against us. more countries voted against asia. on this issue than voted. on the neutralised resolution which we were so much opposed to same thing happened. the candidate

we are the united states of america. we are being laughed at. >> donald trump ran for office saying that other countries were laughing at us and they wouldn't laugh at us anymore. >> they are laughing at us. we don't know what we're doing. they are laughing at us because they think we're stupid. >> what we saw was actually the literal exhibit of what he was talking about. how did that happen? >> i think the world doesn't know what to make of us anymore. for the first time, we have actually become frightening for people. >> diplomats and experts have come to the same judgement. >> donald trump's affect on america's standing on the world has been nothing short of disastrous. >> donald trump introduced an element of brutality and vulgarity. this is not the way we are supposed to run decent democratic societies. >> we're in very big trouble. i'm terribly worried. i feel like we need to sort of find a bench, sit down, clear our head. remember who we are, how we got here. >> it wasn't so long ago that we were the world's great

later president of the united states. he later leaves the democratic party and joins the antislavery free soil party. we will get to that in a future lecture. representing the south for the democrats, we have another legendary figure -- john c calhoun. calhoun, a rabid defender of slavery. but also a rabid opponent of the tariff. he hates the tariff so much, in fact, that calhoun calls the tariff of 1828 the tariff of abominations. he says it discriminates against the south. sure enough, that same year, calhoun offers in secret -- and he does it in secret because he is vice president of the united states -- calhoun authors in secret nsa advocating -- an nullification the idea that the states can make nolan void any law any federal law they view as unconstitutional. from the west, we have andrew jackson. there he is. no man. probably the most colorful president in united states history. i say probably i think we can state almost objectively the most colorful president in u.s. history. a giant of a figure. he stood at 6'1".

states and the first lady of the united states. this shows how important testing, tracing and quaranti quarantining and isolate is. the president does fall into a high risk of category. he's older and some what over weight. i don't know about any other preexisting conditions that he may or may not have. the important thing is he's in an age group that does have and risk for severe covid. so this is very concerning. >> we are showing picture of the key white house team going into marine one. they're sharing many debates and meetings and fundraisers during that time. none of them wore a mask and none of them social distancing. this is very concerning. this has been the issue all along. >> the cdc and dr. fauci, all said how important it is to wear a mask. the trump team has not done a good job or set an example. the number of people could be exposed of at-risk of contracting the virus is significant here. >> what are the next steps now? the cdc's guidelines quarantining for how long? >> the cdc's guidelines suggested anyone exposed t

the president of the united states the commander-in-chief of the united states. >>this is where we are today. because of a failure of leadership by this administration. >>senator harris we've seen changes in the in the role of the united states in terms of global leadership over the past 4 years. and of course times do change. sure definition which seems streams with china of course as the vice president mentioned we strange with our traditional allies in nato and elsewhere. what is your definition of the role of american leadership. in 2020. so. >>you know, joe is i love talking to joe about a lot of these issues and you know joe i think he said it quite well he says you know foreign policy might sound complicated but really it's relationships they're just think about is relationships. so we know this in our personal professional you got keep your word to your friends. at the loyalty of friends people have stood with you got to stand with them. you gotta know we're at the series are and keep them in check. but what we have seen with donald trump. is that he has

interlinked with the united states and united states. should change they are metion that they cannot at a core support the coup attempt. by providing. allegations. unites its debts should be a result united states result that you should be greece united not ikea's together with the clinton administration and also united states also all the problems with spain you know that spain also want to buy and use if they will the crew at them sent the freshest the use of it and i don't mean to interrupt it's just that i'm going to come back to some of this in a bit i want to get a question in to fabrice there for bruce i want to try to take a step back for a moment could you explain to our viewers what exactly the s. 400 system does and why it causes this level of concern right now. well basically it brings a highly sophisticated russian refinery system into turkey's territorial defense and the problem here is that since 2010 nato is building a nato wide anti me side assists them mostly reliant on the american patry out systems. and then the probl

the united states senate. the united states senate is where there will be a decision on whether we put on the floor a bill that my brother cory booker from new jersey and i wrote called the george floyd justice and policing act. says, like joe biden and i say, should ban chokeholds because george floyd would be alive today if that were the case. a bill that says, let's have a national registry of police officers who break the law because that is the right thing to do and we cannot have folks just get fired and then get hired someone out -- somewhere else. it says that we need to get a national standard for excessive use of force because it is not right that in some places, the question asked is, was it reasonable? when we all know that you can reason away just about anything and the more fair and just question is, was it necessary? we need to change the standard. yes, kind of decisions, they get made from the white house, and we will make them. it also gets made in the senate. -- you have toto send them to the

states, the commander in chief of the united states. this is where we are today, because of a failure of leadership by this administration. susan: senator harris, we have seen changes in the role of the united states in terms of global leadership over the past four years. and of course talks do change. we seem to strains with china, as the vice president mention. we seen strains with our nato allies and elsewhere. what is your definition of the role of american leadership in 2020? sen. harris: i love talking with joe about a lot of these issues. i think joe said it quite well. he said foreign policy might sound complicated, but really it's relationships. just think about it as relationships. we know this in our personal and professional relationships. you've got to keep your word to your friends. you got to be loyal with your friends. people who have stood with you, you've got to stand with them. got to know your adversaries are, and keep them in check. what we have seen with donald trump is that he has betrayed our friends, and embrace

on theissue president of the united states. on the issue of this nomination, joe andi the issue of this nomination, joe and i are very clear, as are the majority of the american people. we are 27 days before the decision about who will be the next president of the united states. before, when his conversation has come up, it has been about election time, we are literally in an election. over 4 million people have voted. 4 million people. in the process of voting right now. joe has been clear, let the american people fill that seat in the white house and then we will fill that seat on the united states supreme court. so your point, susan, theissues supreme court. so your point, susan, the issues before us couldn't be more serious, the issue of choice, andi more serious, the issue of choice, and i will always fight for a woman's right to make a decision about her own body, it should be her decision not that of trump and the vice president. can be more proud to serve as vice president for one that danced without apology for the san

states. >> more than 7 1/2 million confirmed cases in the united states. we are going to have much more news right after this. and nony days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424. when was the last time your property tawhat?l went down? never. are you kidding me? for years, the residential burden has gone up. while the corporate burden has gone down. prop 15 reverses that. it closes corporate loopholes and invests in schools, small business, and firefighters. and when the big corporations pay more, your tax bill goes down. that's right. a savings of a hundred twenty-one dollars a year for the average home. give homeowners a break. vote yes on 15. >>> a marathon interview today with the radio host rush limbaugh, president trump had some very strong and pro-fine words for one of america's fiercest adversaries, warning iran of strong retaliation if it messes with the united states. and fareed zakaria looks at president trump's relationships between the united states and its allies. here's a

and what was the world like before the united states of america? stop and think about what the world was like. there were despotic leaders trampling over other people. they have to think twice about that now. then, think about the innovation , the entrepreneurship, the hard makingat went into america into a great place. that is what makes us the kind of place that works for everybody. some people say, well, america was good some groups, but maybe not so good for other groups. again, maybe they need a history lesson. say nothing ever happened for african-americans in this country and that they didn't contribute, all you have to do is take a walked on the street, and you can start by looking at your shoes. it was a black man who invented the automatic shoe blessing machine, which revolutionized the world of shoes. the street, you look at it so clean. it was a black man who invented the automatic street sweeper. and down that street comes a refrigerated tractor truck, and it was frederick drones, a black man, who invented the system later adopted for

well no doubt the united states will remain on a course of the united states 1st but at the same time that's how the united states have always acted but what changed is that suddenly alliances longstanding commitments like with many like with europe seemed conditional they seemed transactional particularly when it came to nato that's also an undercurrent in the whole issue of the north stream pipeline which is hugely unpopular in europe as well donald trump clearly also wants to see germany take more liquid gas from the united states so their economic interests behind that but what germany would expect and could expect from dubai because he's said so that he would revisit many policy areas foreign policy areas is that the whole strategic thinking in terms of alliances and all those said values would come back into the equation rather than playing political hardball which is something that europe despite everything is still getting to grips with so is germany actually let's go back to washington is there a sense in washington that president trump has also build a loss of trust between

the united states can do that policy, all on its own. but it would work a whole lot better on this if the other countries are doing it so it is not partly undone by leakage and manufacturing your ships from the united states to other countries, hurting our economy and undoing some of what we wanted to do on climate change. that is the importance of the border adjustment that i talked about in my opening remarks and in creating a system where you don't have mutual cheerleading to get other countries on board, you also have a concrete incentive for other countries to get on board. of that, my maybe my trade colleagues here get nervous about it, i think should operate through trading. thank you. will keep this short because basically i agree with everything jason said. so, absolutely, climate change has got to be part of the agenda. a running theme in a memo i wrote was the need to invest in the future and the three types of investments i was thinking to ere children and infrastructure offending climate and technology, i had to choose two o

that the united states is serious about i want security. that there increases risk we would never do this with south korea with japan u.g.g. can't be doesn't work we know is destabilizing. and yet. we're doing that with our want. a new bill in congress aims to make big changes committing future presidents to defending taiwan in the event of an attack it's also congressman ted yoho republican on the house foreign affairs committee explained the overtime want to engage in prevention act there are several things one it delineates if there were an attack on taiwan by china that it would authorize an a u m l the united states congress to allow the president to go in and defend taiwan militarily and a u.m.s. that's an authorization for use of military force and i think the biggest thing it does is it gets rid of the strategic or political or diplomatic ambiguity that's lasted since the seventy's it's been a just. a lot of ambiguity or taiwan stance but critics say this could backfire either by provoking china or by encouraging risky behavior by t

up to the united states have imposed sanctions or we. not screamers to nice to you're on your back. and have no possibility to rightly many challenges us nancy yet here. and there was a highlight is an example of the european union has reported that for example yet ringback yet again companies so. massive write about one. and a grace formerly well being you know humanitarian he's. actually just on a practical man. what advice would you give to countries and presumably you applaud the e 3 u.k. france and germany for not following up on the sanctions what do you say to a company that may want to do business with one of these countries and may be subjected to 3rd party sanctions what are they supposed to do we had may have a contribution to health care or. indirectly what are they supposed to do should they just not do the business or risk the body sanctions from washington and no receipt from the platen purpose to protect human rights and. germany's business to grantee the basic needs of people. and. eastern accumulator and. here well being action. that they have reason the doorway ru

the united states with the growing brown key military agreement with russia most recently from the i and the but before that from the a.b.m. treaty and now so they're planning with a group of the open skies agreement. and now you know it could be that the new start treaty has also put history so that one thing well the other thing which is over real terms on russia is the level of a betrayal that is directed toward russia and of from ordinary the from the tabloid press but from the very. highest levels of the u.s. government it will not be. the people who are in the executive branch with people who are in congress. and of course you have the media stoking those so when you have. the absence of any arms agreements a possible arms race developing process that it's already a possibility yes then russia does view of britain and is obviously growing towards china now china also feels very threatened because it is gradually replacing the united states as the global they have enormous economic and financial power and never in history has one had your money quietly ceded its the role in the

the united states with the growing brown key military agreement with russia most recently from the i and the but before that from the a.b.m. treaty and now so they're planning with a group of the open skies agreement. and now you know it could be that the new start treaty has also put history so that one thing well the other thing which is over real terms on russia is the level of a betrayal that is directed toward russia and of from ordinary the from the tabloid press but from the very. highest levels of the u.s. government about the. the people who are in the executive branch with people who are in congress. and of course you have the media stoking those so when you have. the absence of any arms agreements possible arms race developing process and it's already a possibility yes then russia does view of britain and is obviously growing towards china now china also feels very threatened because it is gradually replacing the united states as the global they have enormous economic and financial power and never in history has one had your money quietly ceded its the role in the world to

i think it's in the best interest of the united states and the world as a whole that the united states negotiate rather than go back to the cold war relationship with the soviet union. i don't look at the picture as bleakly as you have indicated in your question, mr. trewhitt. i believe that the united states has had many successes in recent years, in recent months as far as the communist movement is concerned. we have been successful in portugal where a year ago it looked like there was a very great possibility that the communists would take over in portugal. it didn't happen. we have a democracy in portugal today. a few months ago -- or i should say maybe two years ago the soviet union looked like they had continued strength in the middle east. today, according to prime minister rabin, the soviet union is weaker in the middle east than they have been in many, many years. the facts are the soviet union relationship with egypt is at a low level. the soviet union relationship with syria is at a very low point. the united states today, according to prime minister rabin of israel, is at a

it is time for new leadership of the united states of america. [cheers and applause] >> thank you. my fellow americans, tonight, i accept the challenge and the commitment to provide the new leadership for america, and i ask you to accept it with me. let us accept this challenge not as a grim duty, but as an exciting adventure in which we are convinced to help a great -- privileged to help a great nation realize its destiny, and let us begin by committing ourselves to the truth, to see it like it is and tell it like it is. to find the truth, to speak the truth, and to live the truth. that is what we will do. [cheers and applause] we had enough for a little promise and little action in the united states of america. [cheers and applause] >> catch up with more past >> so tonight, i do not promise the millennium in the morning. i do not promise we can eradicate poverty and end discrimination and eliminate all danger of war. i do promise action. a new policy for peace abroad, a new policy for peace and progress and justice at home. look at our problems

any agreement signed on behalf of the united states. as far as meeting with the -- i haves concerned averaged better than one meeting a month. the secretary of state has appeared in these several years that he has been the secretary before 80 different committee hearings in the house and in the senate. the secretary of state has made better than 50 speeches explaining american foreign-policy. i have made myself at least 10 speeches in various parts of the country where i have discussed with the american people defense and foreign policy. >> present ford. -- president ford. --s. ford: shows they used to brad back end nikitaff -- khrushchev's day that they would get us? france and italy are flirting with communism. we have recognized up permanent -- a permit communist regime in east germany. we have signed an agreement in helsinki that the russians have dominance and eastern europe. we bailed out soviet agriculture , we have given them large loans, access to our best technology and of the senate had with the jackson amendment, maybe even

count six, conspiracy to murder united states citizens outside of the united states. count seven, conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists in the form of hostage taking resulting in death and murder. count eight, conspiracy to provide material support to a terrorist organization. if convicted, the defendants face a maximum penalty of life in prison for each count of conviction. pursuant to well-known protections provided by our constitutional republic in its system of criminal justice, kotey and elsheikh are presumed innocent unless and until proven otherwise. all that i'm about to recount now are allegations and can be found in the four corners of the 24-page indictment which was unsealed just a moment ago. as stated in that charging document, these alleged terrorists both grew up in the united kingdom where they became radicalized. their role within the isis terrorist organization was that of being part of a brutal hostage taking scheme by which american, european and asian citizens were taken hostage from approximately 2012 to 2015. their alleged crimin

and the united states is at peace today. what is more moral and foreign policy than for the administration to take the lead in the world food conference in rome in 1974? when the united states committed 6 million metric tons of food over 60% of the food committed for the disadvantaged and underdeveloped nations of the world, the foreign administration wants to eradicate hunger and disease you in our undeveloped countries around the world. what is more moral for the united states, under the ford administration, to take the lead in southern africa, in middle east. those are initiatives in foreign policy which are of the highest moral standards and that is indicative of the foreign policy of this country. >> yeah, can we stick with morality? for a lot of people seems to cover a bunch of sins. mr. nixon, kissinger used to tell us that instead of morality we have to worry in the world about living with and letting live all types of governments that we didn't like. north and south korean dictator 's, chilean facets, chinese commun

the united states with a growing brown key military agreement with russia most recently from the ins but before that the a.b.m. treaty and now they're planning with a group of the open skies agreement. and now you know it could be that the new start treaty has also put history so that one thing well the other thing which is over real terms on russia is the level of a bit true that is directed toward russia and of from ordinary the from the tabloid press but from the very. highest levels of the u.s. government it will be. the people who are in the executive branch with people who are in congress. and of course you have the media stoking those so when you have. the absence of any arms agreements a possible arms race developing process the sort of hostility yes then russia does view of britain and is obviously growing towards china now china also feels very threatened because it is gradually replacing the united states as the global they have enormous economic and financial power and never in history has one has your money quietly ceded its the role in the world to a rising hetman and g

if ireland rose up against the british empire and the united states had signed this, would the united states have any commitment? external aggression. it would not. okay? but i want you to look at this. this is a extremely controversial part of the versailles peace treaty. it's the shantung controversy. shantung had been an area of china which germany had taken over in 1898 and when germany took over, it applied the doctrine of extraterritoriality so if a german businessman raped and murdered a chinese woman, the chinese police couldn't touch him. only german police operating there could touch him. well, when world war i began, japan was an ally of great britain. so japan declared war on germany, occupied a bunch of german possessions in the pacific, and then took over the shantung peninsula and then at the versailles peace conference, woodrow wilson realized for a couple of reasons he needed japan's support for the treaty so he said to the japanese, what's it going to take? the japanese had a great idea. they said, we want one small little thing. we want a racial equality clause in t

the united states with a growing brown key military agreement with russia most recently from the ins but before that the a.b.m. treaty and now as though they're planning with a group of the open skies agreement. and now you know it could be that the new start treaty has also put history so that one thing well the other thing which is over real terms on russia is the level of a big true that is directed toward russia and of from ordinary the from the tabloid press but from the very. highest levels of the us government it will be. the people who are in the executive branch with people who are in congress. and of course you have the media stoking those so when you have. the absence of any arms agreements a possible arms race developing process the sort of hostility yes then russia does view of britain and is obviously growing towards china now china also feels very threatened because it is gradually replacing the united states as the global they have enormous economic and financial power and never in history has one had your money quietly ceded its the role in the world to a rising vete

to the united states senate. i serve on the senate intelligence committee where i've been in regular receipt of classified information about threats to our nation and hot spots around the world. i have travelled the world. i've met with our soldiers in war zones, and i think joe has asked me to serve with him because he knows that we share, we share a purpose which is about lifting up the american people. and after the four years that we have seen of donald trump, unifying our country around our common values and principles. >> thank you, senator harris. neither president trump nor vice president biden has released a sort of detailed health information that had become the modern norm until the 2016 election. and in recent day, president trump's doctors have given misleading answers or refused to answer basic questions about his health. and my question to each of you in turn, is this information voters deserve to know? vice president pence works you like to go first? >> well, susan, thank you. and let me say on be

united states needs or has his nearly 50 years in politics been emblematic of the problems that have led the country to this stage for mass incarceration and the war on drugs to imperialism a new book yesterday's man the case against joe biden looks at the veterans had his career all the way back to his days as a public defender and its author brigham architecture joins me now via skype from cancun ranker thanks so much for coming on biden favored to become president in november he supported by bernie sanders no i'm chomskyan angela davis have been on this show telling people to support biden tell me about the terrifying record of biden in your new book or the main troll biden is that he has been very conservative throughout his entire career and really kind of. created the conditions in many ways that led to trump's roys. which i think is kind of. the main worry with him is is is he going to be able to step up to the plate and meet the mormon they're not just with the pen demo can be and there is a tradition that's having that also as you say the climate crisis which is easily the t

but not the have, president of the united states. the president of the united states needs a line item veto on congress puts into appropriations bills unnecessary spending. let the president put a line through that, send it back to congress,, the congress vote again. congress has got to help out in reducing this budget deficit. brokaw, last: tom question for senator bentsen. tom brokaw: i would like to ask you about your split personality during this election year. you are running on the ticket with michael dukakis, and matt who is opposed to the death penalty, and man in favor of gun control and at the same time, you are running for the united states senate in the state of texas your position on many of those issues is well known and absolutely opposed to him. how do you explain to the people of texas how you could be a social conservative on those cutting issues and still run with michael dukakis on the national ticket? sen. bentsen: michael dukakis is when looking for a clone. i think it is the strength of this method he reaches o

defend the support, united states against all enemies foreign and domestic. that i will bear true faith and allegiance. [indiscernible] justice barrett: the duties of the office of which i am about to enter. so help me god. [applause] justice barrett: thank you. thank you so very much. thank you all for being here tonight. and thank you, president trump, for selecting me to serve as an associate justice of the united states supreme court. it is a privilege to be asked to serve my country in this office and i stand here tonight truly honored and humbled. thanks also to the senate for giving its consent to my appointment. i am grateful for the confidence you have expressed in me and i pledge to you and to the american people that i will discharge my duties to the very best of my ability. this was a rigorous confirmation process and i thank all of you, especially leader mcconnell and chairman graham for helping me to navigate it. my heartfelt thanks go to the members of the white house staff and department of justice who worked tirelessly to support me through t

of the united states. and this is the second bank of the united states. because as you recall, from earlier in the semester, there was a first bank of the united states, 1791, alexander hamilton, pushes through congress a bank of the united states, this bank, a private bank, with stockholders, and dividends, this bank, hamilton says, will benefit not only financial, private financial interests but will benefit the country, the public. how will it benefit the public? because the treasury, the u.s. treasury will deposit money in the bank, money coming in from taxes, and the treasury can also borrow money from the bank, this bank has a 20-year charter, but it has lots of opponents. you remember, that chief opponent, thomas jefferson hates the bank. the bank, jefferson believes, is an institution that imperils american liberty. by elevating to power a wealthy financial elite. an unproductive elite. jefferson opposes it. jefferson comes to power in 1800. so the bank of the united states, the first bank, the cha

i am proud of the constitution of the united states. i am proud of the vision of the voter empowerment, citizen engagement and participation as a foundation for what we do in this country. but i have really been stunned by the scope of those in the chamber that believe in voter suppressioni and intimidation. i am stunned that they do not share the view of the government of, by and for the people. that is the oath of office we took was to the constitution. i'm also stunned that it has been passed in the house and this body has sat on its hands for five l months. and now the leader of this body says mr. president, don't negotiate with speaker pelosi. we don't want to vote. on a bill that would really help america. you have the treasury secretary and the speaker ready to make a deal and the leader of the body saying don't do it. for five months, don't do it. always think of the phrase you hear growing up [inaudible] america suffers while the senati slumbers under the leadership that says no vote on a comprehensive package to help thean hea

for five weeks as korean republican and united states forces under the united states flag font to stem the tide of north korean communist aggression, while the security council took emergency steps in an effort to halt that aggression, a dovie at -- a delegate of the soviet union exempted himself from deliberations and decisions. with the heroic help of the republican fighting forces, the united nations troops fought and fell back, trading space for time until more help could arrive. a soviet delegate, for the first time since the invasion, return to take his seat in the security council. it was the turn of the soviet to preside. ignored theely north korean communist aggression and began a systematic campaign as president to block any action on the korean war by the security council. the united nations troops battled the soviet armed communist invaders. the security council tried without success to prod the soviet delegate to his responsibility. as august day followed august day, the united nations continued its fight in korea. the soviety council, delegate sat impassive, rendering imp

states in the pacific even 5 years ago the ability of the united states to come to taiwan's defense was greater than it is today. and with the balance of power shifts china's favor the prospect looms larger that it will decide to watch james final says there's even a kind of historical deadline on the horizon the 100th anniversary of communist china in 2049 i believe that whoever is the leader of the people's republic of china on 1 october 20. second to stand up and turn of the propensity to give a speech to the people who are trying to a 1000000000 plus people and that person is going to have to say we have achieved a great rejuvenation of china and we are now completely restored and all in the race the shame of the century of humiliation fell argues than any invasion would have to take place within the next decade for the dust to settle in time for that momentous date my theory is if you could take 20 years is the time that the world would forget anything then you back that up from 2049 you're basically at 2030 and so i've characterized what we're in right now it's just begun it's

not the president of the united states. the president of the united states needs a line item veto, when congress goes ahead to put in procreation bills, and unprecedented spending. let the president put a line through that, let the congress vote on it again. congress has to help out in reducing this budget deficit, as much as the executive branch. >> last question for senator brendan. >> senator pence and i like to ask you about your split personality during this electioneer. you're running a ticket with michael dukakis, a man who is opposed to the death penalty. a man in favor of gun control, at the same time you are running for the united states senate in the state of texas, where your position on many of the same issues as well known and absolutely opposed to him. how do you explain to the people of texas how you can be a social conservatives on those cutting issues and still run with michael dukakis on the national ticket? >> michael dukakis was not looking for a clone, it is part of the strength and character of this m

for five weeks, as korean republican and united states forces under the united nations flag fought to stem the tide of north korean communist aggression, while the security council took emergency steps in an effort to halt that aggression, a delegate of the soviet union exempted himself -- pointedly absented himself from deliberations and decisions. with the heroic help of the republican fighting forces, the united nations troops fought and fell back, trading space for time until more help could arrive. on august 1, a soviet delegate, for the first time since the invasion, returned to take his seat in the security council. it was the turn of the soviet to preside. he deliberately ignored the north korean communist aggression and began a systematic campaign as president to block any action on the korean war by the security council. the united nations troops battled the soviet armed communist invaders. the security council tried without success to prod the soviet delegate to his responsibility. as august day followed august day, the united nations continued its fight in korea. on the se

. >> the president of the united states! >> mister chairman, delegates to this convention, my fellow americans, four years ago, standing in this very place, i proudly accepted your nomination for president of the united states. and with your help and with the votes of millions of americans, we won a great victory in 1968. tonight, i again proudly accept your nomination for president of the united states. and let us pledge ourselves to win an even greater victory this november, in 1972. [applause] i congratulate chairman ford, i congratulate chairman dole, and armstrong and the hundreds of others who have laid the foundation for that victory by their work at this great convention. our platform is a dynamic program for peace in the world. and speaking in a very personal sense, i express my deep gratitude and this convention for the tributes you have paid to the best campaigner in the nixon family, my wife pat. in honoring her, you have honored millions of women in america who have contributed in the past, and will contribute i

we have taken the incentive away to move jobs out of the united states. it is a win for workers and a -- workers in michigan and a win for workers all across america. [applause] it is. >> "four more years!" withpres. pence: i'm her. >> "four more years!" pence: i'm not surprised a woman with the veteran sweatshirt was cheering for the usmca. it is a win for autoworkers, and you know it. you all in michigan deserve to know that kamala harris was one of only 10 senators to vote against the usmca. she and i had a little bit of a debate over in salt lake city a couple of weeks ago. [cheers and applause] thank you. i've tried to call her out on a lot of issues. the truth is, she said that she voted against 1 -- only 10 senators who voted against this. 90 senators in washington do not agree on anything. they did on the usmca. she was rated last year as the most liberal member of the united states senate and actually voted against the usmca because she said it did not go far enough on climate change. you all deserve to know that she put her radical, environmenta

. >>> welcome to our viewers here in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer in washington. this is special edition of "the situation room." and we begin tonight with two numbers that really matter. as of tonight there's only ten days until election day here in the united states, until voters choose whether to keep donald trump as president or to vote him out and elect former vice president joe biden. but the second number is also so powerful. the johnson & johnson hop kns university reported that 83,757 new cases of the coronavirus in the united states occurred just yesterday. that's the highest number of new confirmed cases reported in a single day here in the united states since the pandemic began so many months ago. a truly staggering number. and nearly 1,000 americans died from the virus just yesterday. this is a pandemic that now seems to be spiraling out of control. not that you would necessarily know that if you were listening today to the president out there on the campaign trail. right now let's go to wisconsin where the president wi

i think that the united states and russia both are hearing from europeans who are caught in the middle on why the treaty should not just be extended for one year, but for five years, and why this should be the basis from which further discussions happen, not just between the u.s. and russia, but also the wider p5, which includes the u.k., france, and china. while the u.k., france, and china have far less nuclear weapons, the five of them do need to continue forward in a united way and come up with some proposals that all five of them can contribute towards, ahead of the conference that will happen next year. on the iran front, this is a giant wake-up call to europeans. the u.s. withdrawal from the jcpoa can be seen as a sacrificial lamb of something much bigger. this withdrawal has generated conversations in europe about the need for europeans -- european strategic autonomy, i need to move away from the dollar and increase the salience of the euro. it's also led europeans to think hard about whether they can trust the united states in dealings on further arms control measures with othe

we look to federal judges to toe united states -- and the united states supreme court to tell us what reasonable and unreasonable means. but in all cases, our federal judges and the united states supreme court is supposed to demonstrate judicial restraint. when it's a close question, when it's a matter of social -- major social or economic policy, then the federal judiciary is supposed to show deference to the united states congress, but more and more, it's not. and some americans like that. some of my colleagues in this chamber like that. they think that the united states supreme court ought to be a mini congress. they think that the united states supreme court should be a political body. they like the fact that if they can't pass a law changing social and economic policy through the united states congress, they get a second bite at the apple and can go to the united states supreme court. i don't believe that is constitutional. nor does judge barrett, i concluded, after 30 hours of testimony, and that's why her confirming will not be unanimous in this body. let me tell you what i bel

states in the pacific even 5 years ago the ability of the united states to come to taiwan's defense was greater than it is today. and with the balance of power shifts china's favor the prospect looms larger that it will decide to act james final says there's even a kind of historical deadline on the horizon the 100th anniversary of communist china in 2049 i believe that whoever is the leader of the people's republic of china on 1 october 20. second of stand up and turn of the propensity to give a speech to the people who are trying a 1000000000 plus people and that person is going to have to say we have achieved a great rejuvenation of china and we are now greatly restored in all the races the shame of the century of humiliation for belloc used in any invasion would have to take place within the next decade for the dust to settle in time for that never meant state my theory is if you could take 20 years as the time that the world war forget anything then you back that up from 2049 you're basically a 2030 and so i've characterized what we're in right now it's just begun it's the deca

let's now go to washington, dc in the united states. what do you want to ask? hello. what effects do the trade war have on the tech, workforce and labour conditions? also, are silicon valley and china competing for the best talent? shirley yu. i think, absolutely, last week we heard the news that china just announced it is going to build its first chip university. this university is going to do nothing, the curriculum is going to be centred around the ict industry and not only that it is going to work closely with huawei's chip maker to bridge this gap between education and the commercialisation, so china is basically saying, the us can ban selling chips and equipment to china, but now i am going to attract the best and the brightest of global talent, the professors, the professionals from the industry to teach in china, so as long as china has the brain capacity, it is only a matter of time that china is going to have the products, so this fundamental competition, economically speaking, between china and the us is going to be centred on technology, but the core of te

and in a sense, creating a bit of a constitutional clash with the president of the united states. it's a moving peace and those are all very prominent senators. i knew several of them and worked with them. they look much younger in these pictures. but they're really earnest about what they're saying and they were very convincing to the television audience that -- they had to fight to get that television program in the first place. and so they made the most of it. >> article 1, section 8 of the constitution reads as follows, the congress shall have power to raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years. >> our amendment to end the war fulfills the obligations that we have under the constitution. >> mcgovern/hatfield amendment, who were they and what would this really have done if it passed? >> to back up just a little bit, the president of the united states, richard nixon, had announced in november of 1969 of the program to remove american troops from vietnam. and the thought at that point was, maybe this was the end o

in a sense, creating a bit of a constitutional clash, with the president of the united states. it's a very moving piece. and there's a lot of prominence, i knew several of them, i worked with them, and they look much younger in these pictures. but they really are earn just about what they're saying, they are very convincing to the television audience that watch them. i had to watch to get that television program in the first place. so they made their most of it. >> article one, section eight of the constitution reads as follows. congress shall have power to raise and support armies. but no appropriation of money to that use shelby for a longer term, and then two years. >> our amendment to end the war fulfills the obligations that we have under the constitution. >> mick govern had fueled the summit meant, sometimes referred to who were they unaware -- what this really have done if it past? >> to back up just a little bit. the president of the united states, richard nixon, had announced in november of 1969 the vietnamization program to remove american troops from vietnam. and the