states and united states. should change they are metion that they cannot. support the coup attempts by providing. allegations. unites its debts should be a result united states result that you should be greece united not ikea's together with the clinton administration and also united states also all the problems we spain you know that spain also want to buy and use if they will who let them sent the precious the us if i don't i don't mean to interrupt it's just that i'm going to come back to some of this in a bit i want to get a question in to fabrice there for bruce i want to try to take a step back for a moment could you explain to our viewers what exactly the s. 400 system does and why it causes this level of concern right now. well basically it brings a highly sophisticated russian refinery system into turkey's territorial defense and the problem here is that since 2010 nato is building a nato wide and timi size system must be reliant on the american patry out systems . and then the problem is if you injec

and here in the united states the united states has to work both within our country and also with other countries to bring it to a close hopefully with the arrival of impact seen if that happens in 2021 and the dispersal and distribution of that vaccine around the world and around the united states trying to climb out of the global recession that has been so injurious to so many americans whoever's elected and i hope is going to be vice president biden is going to have perhaps the most difficult global agenda that any president has faced since the 1930 s. global a national agenda i should say since franklin up wrote eleanor roosevelt was elected in 1932 but joe biden's up to it and he's going to have a lot of support in the country to be an activist president who tries to heal the country and unite has to combat these these major concerns how do you make that case to americans that feel that they fought in iraq they fought in afghanistan they fought in korea they fought in vietnam you know generations of military families who feel after financial crises and you know sort of tough times

the united states was still be in innovations. but another really important component of that which i think that covid-19 is pointed out as necessity between united states and are technology factor. you see the growing arrangement this between washington dc. there's number of reasons for that . [inaudible]. people also point to the culture part of it in the liberal or libertarian in the federal government and the national security imperative. but actually we argued that the deeper causes come from decades of underinvestment by the federal government in our domestic technology sector. we have fallen far far below the levels in government investment and as a result, the u.s. technology-based has gone off to chase foreign markets is a sense of our national infrastructure. as a bridging divide and changing the investments in places like ai through initiatives that lower the barriers in cooperation between tech companies and the federal government. helped to change the way that the u.s. procures these technologies can all help. because

and here in the united states the united states has to work both within our country and also with other countries to bring it to a close hopefully with the arrival of impact seen if that happens in 2021 and the dispersal and distribution of that vaccine around the world and around the united states trying to climb out of the global recession that has been so injurious to so many americans whoever's elected and i hope is going to be vice president biden is going to have perhaps the most difficult global agenda that any president has faced since the 1930 s. global a national agenda i should say since franklin up wrote eleanor roosevelt was elected in 1932 but joe biden's up to it and he's going to have a lot of support in the country to be an activist president who tries to heal the country and unite as to combat these these major concerns how do you make the case to americans that feel that they fought in iraq they fought in afghanistan they fought in korea they fought in vietnam you know generations of military families who feel after financial crises and you know sort of tough times th

then it is time for new leadership for the united states of america. [applause and cheers] [applause and cheers] thank you. my fellow americans, tonight i accept the challenge and the commitment to provide that new leadership for america. i ask you to a second accept it with me. let us accept this challenge, not as a grim duty, but as an exciting adventure and which we are polar village to help a great nation realize its destiny. let us begin by committing ourselves to the truth, to see it like it is until it like it is. to find the truth, to speak the truth, and to live the truth, that's what we will do. [applause and cheers] we've had enough of big promises and little action, the time has come for honest government in the united states of america. [applause and cheers] so tonight, i do not promise the millennium in the morning. i don't promise that we can eradicate poverty and and discrimination, eliminate all danger of war. but i do promise action, a new policy for people peace abroad, a new policy for peace and justice at home. look at our problems

in the 1960's, many americans did not believe the united states should help south vietnam, and dissent and demonstrations became to some a way of life. but in the beginning of the 1960's, the threat and the prophecy were clear. >> we face an extremely serious and intense struggle with the communist. we have talked about and heard stories of 15,000 guerrillas operating in vietnam, killing 2000 officers a year, 2000 police officers a year, 4000. there has been an election in vietnam in which 75% of the people or 80% of the people endorsed the government, and yet we read out vietnam is in danger because of guerrilla operations carried on by this small, well-disciplined, well supplied across the border group of guerrillas. how we fight that kind of they problem, which is going -- kind of a problem, which is going to be with us all through this decade, seems to be one of the great problems now before the united states. narrator: both threat and prophecy were made to a land of many gods, hardship, poverty, disease and war have never eroded the faith of the south vietnamese. their faith comin

if the united states can do it, so can we. if the u.s. only threatens our allies and partners will look elsewhere. if we do not ban together and pool their resources, expertise and night, the united states will be ill-equipped for the future challenges. let me conclude where do we go from here. first, we need to rebuild the u.s. foreign polic foreign-polis such as the state department which suffered the loss of extraordinary talent over the past four years. restoring overseas confidence in the united states requires highly qualified to diplomats who conduct themselves in a reliable and transparent manner most relations with allies and partners. it won't be easy but it's absolutely necessary. alliances are a foundational bedrock for protecting the american people. we need partnerships that pull our and resources to counter russia and china and tackle problems we cannot solve alone. third, halting the decline of global freedom and democracy must be a critical objective to the u.s. foreign policy. driving vibrant democracies around the world

the united states withdrawing brahmans key military agreements with russia most recently from the i.n.f. treaty but before that from the a.b.m. treaty and now also they're planning to withdraw from the open skies agreement. and now you know it could be that the new start treaty is also for the history. so that's one thing but the other thing which is over real terms on russia is the level of a big true that is directed toward russia and the strong ordinary be from the tomboys press but from the very highest levels oh the u.s. government to talk about the. the people who are in the executive branch with people who are in congress. and of course you have the media stoking that so when you have. the absence of any omes agreements a bus to go all the train developing buses it's sort of possibility yes then russia does feel threatened and is obviously gone towards china not china also feels very threatened because it is gradually replacing the united states as the global head human have enormous economic and financial power and never in history has one has human quietly ceded its the role in

well the united states is still in europe and my dad fought in world war 2 back in 1940 s. the united states is still in korea and i was last days in korea in 1000 not it so i don't have any issue with having a presence that tries to make sure that we exude what ron reagan is called a peace through strength you know tactics and i know that you have countries such as poland that wants to have better u.s. relations military relations so that they can for any aggression from russia and vladimir putin so i think that is a you know a big difference from having a presence a former president then having some type of aggressive military action you mention poland you can imagine is stony at why is it given that trump tries his best to talk about joe biden's son suspicious money according to him from russia why is it the republicans can't seem to challenge the media narrative that it's trump who is the russian asset well i think it's very interesting if you want to say the president trump is russian asset because when russia i'm not in thing. 'd we're russian the paramilitary forces

i think it's in the best interest of the united states and the world as a whole that the united states negotiate rather than go back to the cold war relationship with the soviet union. i don't look at the picture as bleakly as you have indicated in your question, mr. trewhitt. i believe that the united states has had many successes in recent years, in recent months as far as the communist movement is concerned. we have been successful in portugal where a year ago it looked like there was a very great possibility that the communists would take over in portugal. it didn't happen. we have a democracy in portugal today. a few months ago -- or i should say maybe two years ago the soviet union looked like they had continued strength in the middle east. today, according to prime minister rabin, the soviet union is weaker in the middle east than they have been in many, many years. the facts are the soviet union relationship with egypt is at a low level. the soviet union relationship with syria is at a very low point. the united states today, according to prime minister rabin of israel, is at a

the coronavirus pandemic has revealed 2 important differences between the united states and germany the approach to keeping people healthy and the approach to keeping people employed if you live in the u.s. you are 6 times more likely to be infected with the virus than someone living here in germany and if you take an american worker and a german worker put them both in the pandemic the american may lose his job the german probably will not i'm bringing off in berlin this is the day. you can't fix the economy until you fix the code the crisis i think the people across this country are fed up at a time when they're kind of playing where the next meal's coming from and he has no intention of doing anything about making it better in 47 months and would then you've done it 47 years to. make it crystal clear that. it's more. important the american people if there is an additional round of stimulus then that would add 2 percentage points of growth in 2021 which then would bring us much more quickly back to create crisis that will investors are frustrated that washington can't seem to get its

giving the united states preferences because the united states was in charge of protection. this gets to the issue of nato because the way nato has been talked about is almost a protection scheme. it was set up by the protection scheme, but mutual protection. all of us working together after world war ii and during the cold war. president trump was talking about this at different times that i heard in all of us have heard like the end of the roman empire where the romans would show and second city. -- sack a city. that gives to the point about what do you do with nato? if we get back to the thought that is collective, a kind of mutual place for cooperation on the bigger problems of the day, then that will put us in a better position moving ahead. the difficulty will be of trying to come up with a new vision for nato and i think we should not do that. given everything we have talked about today the environment is not placed for this. threats are different than what they were after world war ii. they are not only in the form of countries. they are global pandemics, they are go

to the united states have imposed sanctions or will last 18 knots 3 mr nice to you are on your back. yet or not was it it's my humanitarian it is us nancy yet here. and there was a high representative of the european union has reported that for example yet yet again companies so. massive got one. and grace for merlin well beyond all's not humanitarian he's. actually just on a practical man. what advice would you give to countries and presumably you applaud the e 3 u.k. france and germany for not following up on the sanctions what do you say to a company that may want to do business with one of these countries and may be subjected to 3rd party sanctions what are they supposed to do it may have a contribution to health care or. indirectly what are they supposed to do should they just not do the business or risk the body sanctions from washington and will recede from the purpose to protect human rights and. journeys mr grant. and seems even accumulator and. here. being the sanction. the. reason the doorway rumpel human it's very. human rights not less than sanctions. even to the majorit

states. >> that i will support and defend the constitution of the united states. >> against all enemies, foreign and domestic. >> against all enemies, foreign and domestic. >> that i will bear full faith and allegiance to the same. >> i will bear full faith and allegiance to the same. >> that i take this obligation freely. >> i take this obligation freely. >> without any mental reservation. >> or purpose of evasion. >> or purpose of evasion. >> and that i will faithfully discharge. >> and i will vow and faithfully discharge. >> the duty of the office on which i'm about. >> the duty of the office on which i am about to enter. >> so help me god. >> so help me god. [applause] thank you. thank you so very much. thank you all for being here tonight, and thank you, president trump, for selecting me to serve as an associate justice of the united states supreme court. it is a privilege to be asked to serve my country in this office, and i stand here tonight truly honored and humbled. thanks also to the senate for giving us consent to my appointment. i am grateful for the confidence you have exp

the united states senate so now with regard to china. susan 1st and foremost china is to blame for the crime of arms in prison and trump is not happy about it he's made that very clear made it clear again today that china and the world health organization do not play straight with the american people. we did not let our personnel in the china to get information on the coronavirus until the middle of february fortunately president trump in dealing with china from the outset of the summits rouge and standing up to china that have been taking advantage of america for decades in the wake of joe biden's cheerleading for china president trump made that decision before the end of january to suspend all travel from china and again the murder people deserve no joe biden oppose president trumps to sit and suspend all travel from china he said it was a stair release it thank you nice filled with him it's a present from presidents other times i'm going to continue to stand strong q vice president we want to improve the relationship but we're going t

we have taken the incentive away to move jobs out of the united states. workers and ar win for workers all across america. [applause] it is. >> "four more years!" i with her. >> "four more years!" that sheurprised started cheering. it is a win for autoworkers, and you know it. you all in michigan deserve to know that kamala harris was one of only 10 senators to vote against the usmca. she and i had a little bit of a debate over and salt lake city a couple of weeks ago. [cheers and applause] thank you. i've tried to call her out on a lot of issues. the truth is, she said that she voted against one, there are only 10 senators who voted against this. 90 senators in washington do not agree on anything. mca.did on the usc she was rated last year as the most liberal member of the united states and actually voted against the usmca because she said it did not go far enough i climate change. you all deserve to know that she put the radical environmental agenda ahead of michigan jobs and michigan autoworkers. [booing] you, under president donald trump, we are alway

states and united states. should change they are region that they cannot. support the coup at counters that by providing. allegations. unites its debts should be a result united states result that you should be greece united not ikea's together with the clinton administration and also united states also all the problems we spain you know that spain also want to buy and use if they will who at them sent the precious the us to fight and i don't mean to interrupt it's just that i'm going to come back to some of this in a bit i want to get a question in to fabrice there for bruce i want to try to take a step back for a moment could you explain to our viewers what exactly the s. 400 system does and why it causes this level of concern right now. well basically it brings a highly sophisticated russian refinery system into turkey's territorial defense and the problem here is that since 2010 nato is building a nato wide and timi size system must be reliant on the american patry out systems . and then the problem is if

let's now go to washington, dc in the united states. what do you want to ask? hello. what effects do the trade war have on the tech, workforce and labour conditions? also, are silicon valley and china competing for the best talent? i think, absolutely, last week we heard the news that china just announced is going to build its first chip university. this university is going to do nothing, all the curriculum is going to be centred around the ict industry and not only that it is going to work closely with huawei's chip maker to bridge this gap between education and the commercialisation, so china is basically saying, the us can ban on selling chips and equipment to china, but now i am going to attract the best and the brightest of global talent, the professors, the professionals from the industry to teach in china, so as long as china has the brain capacity it is only a matter of time that china is going to have the products. so this fundamental competition, economically speaking, between china and the us is going to be centred on technology, but the core of technologic

here's what they say: because the midwestern states of the united states are sparsely populated, in order to improve the killing effect, the nuclear killing of u.s. soft targets should concentrate on major cities on the west coast, such as seattle, los angeles, san francisco, and san diego. the 31 a, an earlier version is launched over the north pole, it can easily destroy a series of large cities on the east coast and in new england such as ann arbor, philadelphia, new york, boston, portland, baltimore, and norfolk. >> the f 100 this is designed only to go out to kill aircraft carriers. it's got a very special kind of guidance war head so that just in the few minutes it can be launched from china out to as far as a thousand miles, u.s. aircraft carrier. >> china is absolutely rapidly outpacing us in terms of their military development. what they have in terms of long range missiles that can reach every one of our bases in the pacific, airbases as well as naval bases, and we certainly are at risk in not having the capability to defend ourselves against that. maria: feeling much of china's

and in a sense, creating a bit of a constitutional clash with the president of the united states. it's a moving peace and those are all very prominent senators. i knew several of them and worked with them. they look much younger in these pictures. but they're really earnest about what they're saying and they were very convincing to the television audience that -- they had to fight to get that television program in the first place. and so they made the most of it. >> article 1, section 8 of the constitution reads as follows, the congress shall have power to raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years. >> our amendment to end the war fulfills the obligations that we have under the constitution. >> mcgovern/hatfield amendment, who were they and what would this really have done if it passed? >> to back up just a little bit, the president of the united states, richard nixon, had announced in november of 1969 of the program to remove american troops from vietnam. and the thought at that point was, maybe this was the end o

in a sense, creating a bit of a constitutional clash, with the president of the united states. it's a very moving piece. and there's a lot of prominence, i knew several of them, i worked with them, and they look much younger in these pictures. but they really are earn just about what they're saying, they are very convincing to the television audience that watch them. i had to watch to get that television program in the first place. so they made their most of it. >> article one, section eight of the constitution reads as follows. congress shall have power to raise and support armies. but no appropriation of money to that use shelby for a longer term, and then two years. >> our amendment to end the war fulfills the obligations that we have under the constitution. >> mick govern had fueled the summit meant, sometimes referred to who were they unaware -- what this really have done if it past? >> to back up just a little bit. the president of the united states, richard nixon, had announced in november of 1969 the vietnamization program to remove american troops from vietnam. and the

states has nothing to do with the fact that it is almost four times higher in the united states than spain or germany or canada? >> i was saying in the us many different people are negotiating and typically is paid for on the table that is the consolidation of the pbm's. >> one last question. do people turn a profit in europe quick. >> yes. >> thank you. >> ms. poirier recognize. >> thank you us euro celgene until fairlyly recently in my colleague established that you make will format a cancer drug to know the price what it was when i first hit the market in 2005? >> i remember the number. >> reclaiming my time it is $215 per one poll. turnover was in 2013? i can look it up i have in front of me. >> $412 per pill now more recent with about 2017? >> i would say $700 a. but i have been front of me. >> $719 and today the cost $764 per pill. i am curious, do the drug get substantially more effective in that time to cancer patients need to oppose? >> during that time the development of government included six additional and theions some with, nd balance of patients. >> reclaiming my time

the 38 of 50 nations to sign is the united states of america. secretary of state. >> ladies and gentlemen, we are all aware that this is an extremely historical moment. the charter for world peace has been completed. but this is not the end, and it's only the beginning. the great task lies before us and it is our sacred duty to seek to it that the united nations fulfills its promise. with face in our call, and goodwill in our hearts, and determination to work on piece for this and. i am confident, that with god's help, we shall reach our goal. (applause) >> senator connolly is next to sign for the united states. senator van drew bergh. commando former governor of minnesota. a vital and difficult job, well done. appearing the last nation of the united nations conference, president truman congratulates the 280 delegates and expresses the world hope for the new international organization. >> the charter of the united nations, which you are now signing, is a solid structure upon which we can build a better world. history will honor you. between the

today is an important victory for the united states constitution. today president donald trump delivered on one of the central promises he made to the american people, to nominate principled constitutionalists to the supreme court. today the republican majority in the united states senate delivered on one of the principal promises we made to the american people, to confirm the principled constitutionalists to the supreme court. to everyone who values and cherishes the constitution and the bill of rights, today was an important milestone. to everyone who wants to see the rights of free speech and to engage without censorship and without the government silencing you, today was an important victory. to everyone who cherishes religious liberty, the first liberty protected and the first clause in the bill of rights, the right to live according to your faith and conscience without the government getting in the way, today was an important victory. everyone who values the right to keep and bear arms and protect your home and your family and your life, today

and here in the united states the united states has to work both within our country and also with other countries to bring it to a close hopefully with the arrival of it back seen if that happens in 2021 and the dispersal and distribution of that vaccine around the world and around the united states trying to climb out of the global recession that has been so injurious to so many americans whoever's elected and i hope is going to be vice president biden is going to have perhaps the most difficult global agenda that any president has faced since the 1930 s. global a national agenda i should say since franklin up wrote eleanor roosevelt was elected in 1932 but joe biden's up to it and he's going to have a lot of support in the country to be an activist president who tries to heal the country and unite has to combat these these major concerns how do you make that case to americans that feel that they fought in iraq they fought in afghanistan they fought in korea they fought in vietnam you know generations of military families who feel after financial crises and you know sort of tough times

and here in the united states the united states has to work both within our country and also with other countries to bring it to a close hopefully with the arrival of impact seen if that happens in 2021 and the dispersal and distribution of that vaccine around the world and around the united states trying to climb out of the global recession that has been so injurious to so many americans whoever's elected and i hope is going to be vice president biden is going to have perhaps the most difficult global agenda that any president has faced since the 1930 s. and global a national agenda i should say since franklin up wrote eleanor roosevelt was elected in 1932 but joe biden's up to it and he's going to have a lot of support in the country to be an activist president who tries to heal the country and unite as to combat these these major concerns how do you make the case to americans that feel that they fought in iraq they fought in afghanistan they fought in korea they fought in vietnam you know generations of military families who feel after financial crises and you know sort of tough time

states congress, what is the transparency challenge now for the president of the united states? what does the public deserve to know, a, because he's the president and, b, because we're 32 days to the election. >> i think he's transparent and announcing the diagnosis is a good thing. i know that you are going to see the president hopefully, i hope he and the first lady and staffers who were infected have the same experience i did, i certainly hope it is not like your brother's and we will know what type of experience the president has because that's what happens here in this country and in the united states of america. >> my brother's fine. he did say he was knocked on his you know what for two very tough weeks and many americans are going through. grateful for your insights on this day. i hope they listen to you when you push for better testing protocols on capitol hill. >>> the president of the united states is a covid-19 patient and guess what. that gets the world's attention. e cheeseburger on ciabatta, no tomatoes.. [hard a] tonight... i'll be eating four cheese tortellini

the united states is where the drug companies are increasing their prices. much more the than in any other country. and this is where they are making billions, billions of dollars in profits. last december, the house passed hr three and renamed it in honor of elijah cummings. lower drug costs now. this legislation would authorize medicare to negotiate directly with drug companies for lower prices . president trump supported this change on the campaign trail. but unfortunately he broke his campaign promise now opposes the change . the white house issued a statement declaring that if hr three were presented to the president quote, he would veto the bill. instead of taking on the pharmaceutical industry like he promised , president trump appointed former industry executives to keep positions. these included joe brogan, the former director of the white house domestic policy council. mister grogan personally wrote an op-ed opposing hr three, one week before we passedin the house . here is the bottom line. as a result of president trump's reversal, drug prices hav

is the united states of america? this is a system designed by states. the federal government was created by states. the federal government didn't create the states. the states created the federal government it's foundational. and i, of course, you know, like you, the presiding officer, i was a state-elected official. i was never the governor, but i was probably in many respects qualified in a way today that never occurred to me at the time, and that was i was a regulator. i was a state regulator, elected by the people of my state to regulate things like rates of gas and electricity -- electric utilities, to sight things like transmission lines and power plants and wind farms, to oversee the federal communications commission act and its application in north dakota. and as a state regulator for nearly ten years, by far the greatest problem, the greatest obstacle to doing my job were the maintains coming from -- the mandates coming from washington, d.c., trying to impose their mediocrity on north dakota's excellence. so

iran continued to sell oil to the united states. i believe that it's in our interest and in the interest of israel and iran, and saudi arabia, for the united states to sell arms to those countries. it's for their security as well as ours. ms. frederick: mr. valeriani, a question for president ford. mr. valeriani: mr. president, the policy of your administration is to normalize relations with mainland china. and that means establishing at some point full diplomatic relations and obviously doing something about the mutual defense treaty with taiwan. if you are elected, will you move to establish full diplomatic relations with peking, and will you abrogate the mutual defense treaty with taiwan? and, as a corollary, would you provide mainland china with military equipment if the chinese were to ask for it? mr. ford: our relationship with the people's republic of china is based upon the shanghai communique, of 1972, and that communique, calls for the normalization of relations between the united states and the people's republic. it doesn

united d needs the states. the united states can't succeed without the world, and these are tangible steps that can be taken in that rebuilding process. so much, jason, for someone like you, to so a case tely put forward for constructive optimism and series of purposes, great inspiration. please allow me to turn to karen, who is writing an chair of the council of economic advisors. karen is also a professor of the practice of economics at harvard university. nonresident senior fellow at the peterson institute. she served as the assistant of the treasury for economics, basically the chief economy it and forecaster of the treasury in the second term of the obama administration. prior to that she was vice economic studies at brookings and had a long distinguished career at the reserve as one of the leading researchers on savings and fiscalr behavior issues. karen, overview, please. thanks, adam. be a , am delighted to part of this. important.s policy priorities for the president's council of economic strengthen t

i think it's in the best interest of the united states, and the world as a whole that the united states negotiate rather than go back to the cold-war relationship with the soviet union. i don't look at the picture as bleakly as you have indicated in your question, mr. trewhitt. i believe that the united states has had many successes in recent years, in recent months, as far as the communist movement is concerned. we have been successful in portugal, where a year ago it looked like there was a very great possibility that the communists would take over in portugal. it didn't happen. we have a democracy in portugal today. a few months ago, or i should say, maybe two years ago, the soviet union looked like they had continued strength in the middle east. today, according to prime minister rabin, the soviet union is weaker in the middle east than they have been in many, many years. the facts are, there -- the soviet union relationship with egypt is at a low level. the soviet union relationship with syria is at a very low point. the united states today, according to prime minister rabin of isr

any agreement signed on behalf of the united states. as far as meeting with the -- i haves concerned averaged better than one meeting a month. the secretary of state has appeared in these several years that he has been the secretary before 80 different committee hearings in the house and in the senate. the secretary of state has made better than 50 speeches explaining american foreign-policy. i have made myself at least 10 speeches in various parts of the country where i have discussed with the american people defense and foreign policy. >> present ford. -- president ford. --s. ford: shows they used to brad back end nikitaff -- khrushchev's day that they would get us? france and italy are flirting with communism. we have recognized up permanent -- a permit communist regime in east germany. we have signed an agreement in helsinki that the russians have dominance and eastern europe. we bailed out soviet agriculture , we have given them large loans, access to our best technology and of the senate had with the jackson amendment, maybe even

interlinked with the united states and united states. should change they are metion that they cannot at a core support the coup attempt. by providing. allegations. unites its debts should be a result united states result that you should be greece united not ikea's together with the clinton administration and also united states also all the problems with spain you know that spain also want to buy and use if they will the crew at them sent the freshest the use of it and i don't mean to interrupt it's just that i'm going to come back to some of this in a bit i want to get a question in to fabrice there for bruce i want to try to take a step back for a moment could you explain to our viewers what exactly the s. 400 system does and why it causes this level of concern right now. well basically it brings a highly sophisticated russian refinery system into turkey's territorial defense and the problem here is that since 2010 nato is building a nato wide anti me side assists them mostly reliant on the american patry out systems. and then the probl

. >> the president of the united states! >> mister chairman, delegates to this convention, my fellow americans, four years a

that is good news, that will be beneficial to the united states citizens and hopefully to the rest of the globe. collaboration, cooperation looks very good and the early investment makes sense. pharma companies are drilling down on massive clinical trials, looking at safety results and hopefully competing to get to the starting line first but we could have a number of effective, safe vaccines in record time. a very bad news, sticking with just the vaccine development is at every point along the way this white house, this president has undercut public science, undercut confidence in the public health messages and by doing that may have discouraged a lot of americans from volunteering to get the vaccine, ever be leaving that it is safe and effective. that is really not helpful. communication strategies, clear, effective, scientifically based communication from the start is part of any public health crisis, any public health recovery, and tying the vaccine to his political election which donald trump is done for months and months suggesting there will be an october surprise, an effective

if ireland rose up against the british empire and the united states had signed this, would the united states have any commitment? external aggression. it would not. okay? but i want you to look at this. this is a extremely controversial part of the versailles peace treaty. it's the shantung controversy. shantung had been an area of china which germany had taken over in 1898 and when germany took over, it applied the doctrine of extraterritoriality so if a german businessman raped and murdered a chinese woman, the chinese police couldn't touch him. only german police operating there could touch him. well, when world war i began, japan was an ally of great britain. so japan declared war on germany, occupied a bunch of german possessions in the pacific, and then took over the shantung peninsula and then at the versailles peace conference, woodrow wilson realized for a couple of reasons he needed japan's support for the treaty so he said to the japanese, what's it going to take? the japanese had a great idea. they said, we want one small little thing. we want a racial equality clause in t

united states. i look at cuba, 90 miles off the coast of united states. in 1957, i was in havana. i talked to the american ambassador there. he said he was the second most powerful man in cuba. and even though ambassador smith and ambassador gardner, both are public and ambassadors, both -- both are republican ambassadors, both castro and marxist influences, both of them have testified that in spite of their warnings to the american government, nothing was done. our security depends on latin america. any american looking at the situation in latin america pekin -- feel content with what is going on today -- content with what is going on today? in order to pick up the support of the castro supporters in brazil? at the american conference the summer, when we wanted them to join together in the denunciation of castro and the cuban communist, we couldn't even get the inter-american group to join together in denouncing castro. it was rather a vague statement they made. today, the russians broadcast 10 tim

that's a good point yeah no it was really in it were for the united states in terms of sudan not about i was english of israel because in the end of that then we all understand that the sudanese people are from anybody possible balkan scene i'm not in agreement with this and we know that this happened under pressure and we know as we heard from that up the wants to get off the better is this and so we know or understand that this is lack but this is blackmail this is not peace if any one of our viewers would like a definition of peace i would be more than happy to send it that this is not peace this is not an organization this is blackmail and in some way surrender to washington in order of course are bound to arise it's real life 1st as a country that is trying to get back on its feet and i guess the palestinians must be wondering what's going on that they are being and i suspect they would feel as abandoned by fact i think the word they use is they say that it's another stab in the back for them. well absolutely but all by whom again because when you don't know about peace we're talk

states, the chabder in chief of the united states -- do the commander in chief of the united states. this is where we are today because of a failure of leadership by this administration. >> senator harris, we've seen changes in the, in the role of the united states in terms of global leadership are over the past four years. and, of course, times do change. what's your definition -- we've seen strength with china, of course, as the vice president mentioned. what is your definition of the role of american leadership in 2020? >> so, you know, joe -- i love talking with joe about a lot of these issues and, you know, joe, i think he said it quite well. he says, you know, foreign policy might sound complicated but really it's relationships. just think about it as relationships. so we know this in our personal/professional relationship are. you've got to keep your word to your friends. you've got to be loyal to your friends. people who have stood with you, you've got to stand with them. you've got to know who your adversaries are and keep them in check. but what we have seen with donald tru

the president of the united states, the commander in chief of the united states. this is where we are today because of a failure of leadership by this administration. susan: senator harris, we have seen changes in the role of the united states in terms of global leadership over the past four years. and of course talks do change. what is your definition -- we have seen strains with china, as the vice president mentioned, and with our allies, in nato and elsewhere. what is your definition of the role of american leadership in 2020? sen. harris: i love talking with joe about a lot of these issues. i think joe said it quite well. he said foreign policy might sound complicated, but really it's relationships. just think about it as relationships. we know this in our personal and professional relationships. you've got to keep your word to your friends. you got to be loyal with your friends. people who stood with you, you've got to stand with them. got to know your adversaries are, and keep them in check. what we have seen with donald trump is that he has betrayed our fri

first, the united states will keep all of its treaty commitments. second, we shall provide a shield if a nuclear power threatens a nation allied with us or of a nation whose survival we consider vital to our security. third, in cases involving other types of aggression, we shall furnish military and economic assistance when requested in accordance with our treaty commitment, but we shall look to the nation threatened to resume the primary responsibility for providing manpower for its defense. after i announced this policy i found leaders of pile peeps, thailand, vietnam, other nations that might be threatened with communist direction welcomed this new direction in american foreign policy. the defense of freedom is everybody's business, not just america's business. and it is particularly the responsibility of the people whose freedom is threatened. in the previous administration, we americanized the war in vietnam. in this administration, we are vietnamizing peace. not only resulted in our assuming primary responsibility for fighting the war, but eve

states and general relations generally from the united states and other parts of the world trying to bring back manufacturing with a lot and a lot of these working class blue collar town that has been decimated over the last several decades the instincts are right that doesn't mean the outcomes in the way they choose to pursue those policies are very good as we saw with the trade war most american consumers and american companies that are paying the. terrace for example and they will talk about their instincts but it's their outcomes as you rightly pointed out ok you block travel from china what with all the other things you didn't do or denied ok the biden bandwagon is racing forward to victory as you could almost say at this point in time what could upset the bandwagon himself as we've seen joe biden can also often be is own worst enemy he's benefited from the coronavirus by having fewer opportunities to put his foot in his mouth if something really big happens that takes all of our attention away from the coronavirus again that's probably good for trump i mean i hope that's going

as bad as viner's troubles worse than actually every issue now obviously the united states has been watching the supreme court of the united states at hearings for a a macone barack i mean as as a supreme court nominations and joe biden why is no one ever talking about his support for clarence thomas even after the anything else sex allegations little known his support for judge scalia. has in my opinion been a bit of a unofficial can in a lot of the mainstream press the united states on reporting. very critically about biden or scrutinizing him a mean. he's really use the coronavirus and demick to hide away from the press to not take questions to avoid interviews it's something that people are now starting to talk about a lot more than lida for a long time because the mention of this is that this is a very smart strategy it's very clever the way he's avoiding us for his and what inspired me and i think it's a matter of that just. he about i'm not packing the court not about his history why you're not taking the call but there's a lot of stuff there's a lot of things in this record

you know an understanding between the united states and europe that they will work together on these issues especially because they have a more proximate threat to europe iran is closer to europe its missiles are closer to you're a russian missiles are closer to europe so you know in terms of how devastating these things are it does have an effect and it does wake people up and make them think and i wouldn't be surprised if as a result europeans are more willing and open to hearing about the frustrations that underlie the keep the n.w. and trying to find ways to compliment that effort if not just join it and support it fully all right we are out of times we're going to have to leave it there thanks so much to all our guests sahil shah beatrice finn and shouted joshi and thank you too for watching because he the program again any time of visiting our website al jazeera dot com and for further discussion go to our facebook page that's facebook dot com forward slash a.j. inside story you can also join the conversation on twitter our handle is at a.j. inside story for me and the entire t

states and general relations the generalists in the united states and other parts of the world trying to bring back manufacturing with a lot in a lot of these working class blue collar towns that has been decimated over the last several decades the instincts are right that doesn't mean the outcomes in the way they choose to pursue those policies are very good as we saw with the trade war most american consumers and american companies that are paying the. terrace for example and they will talk about their instincts but if their outcomes as you rightly pointed out ok you block travel from china would all the other things you didn't do or denied ok the biden bandwagon is racing forward to victory as you could almost say at this point in time what could upset the bandwagon himself as we see joe biden can also often be is own worst enemy yeah he's benefited from the coronavirus by having fewer opportunities put his foot in his mouth if something really big happens that takes all of our attention away from the coronavirus again that's probably good for trump i mean i hope that's going to ha

public opinion in the united states, in the united states congress, in the united states press, and also in europe by 1913 and certainly by 1916, europe had ceded any rejection of american hegemony in this -- at least north of the amazon. the war in europe expanded the opportunity for the united states to tighten its hegemony, and also made the united states even more -- the u.s. government even more eager to assert -- to establish stability in the region. when there was so much turmoil in europe, it became even more desirable to try to impose state -- what americans considered stable governments in the countries of central america and the caribbean. when the election of 1916 occurred, and wilson said that he wanted to keep the united he wanted to keep the united states out of war of course the words u.s. troops and haiti in the dominican republic. and in nicaragua. he didn't need the united states to intervene and every country. in the caribbean, and central america. and away it's a little bit like lynching. you don't need to lynch everybody. you lynch some people, and that is the lesso

and the united states is at peace today. what is more moral and foreign policy than for the administration to take the lead in the world food conference in rome in 1974? when the united states committed 6 million metric tons of food over 60% of the food committed for the disadvantaged and underdeveloped nations of the world, the foreign administration wants to eradicate hunger and disease you in our undeveloped countries around the world. what is more moral for the united states, under the ford administration, to take the lead in southern africa, in middle east. those are initiatives in foreign policy which are of the highest moral standards and that is indicative of the foreign policy of this country. >> yeah, can we stick with morality? for a lot of people seems to cover a bunch of sins. mr. nixon, kissinger used to tell us that instead of morality we have to worry in the world about living with and letting live all types of governments that we didn't like. north and south korean dictator 's, chilean facets, chinese commun

of the united states.e president of the united states. and the speech was a dud. it was too high, it was too flowery. but what's really interesting is you're going to see more in "the new york times" first-page coverage of the president's speech. they give the basics of the speech, but you start to see down here some really interesting salvos that are already being waged. the new majority leader of the senate, henry cabbott lodge, is saying, don't forget, we have the right to amend this treaty. and we may have to amend it by two-thirds, but don't forget, we republicans are now the majority because of the elections of 1918. you'll also see that the president greets callers in the special room set aside for the president of the united states at the u.s. capitol, 30 democrats went to see the president, one republican. it was the first sign that very serious trouble was brewing on the fate of the treaty. now to skip ahead, here are the votes. so 100 years ago tonight, and they closed at about 11:00 p.m. washin