now staffers run the new york times. the fact that the editors were allowing the staffers to attack the only fellow staffer who is willing to give a hearing to points of view that were outside the wild leftism of the new york times is pretty incredible. the new york times basically handed over editorship and she rules the roost over there. it's not a piece of journalism it's a piece of pseudo- history designed to paint them in the worst picture. they're tearing down statues of the founders, suggesting that ulysses s grant is a bad guy and she tweeted back that she was proud of that which kind of gives the game away. walter was the bad guy but he still had his pulitzer and not much has changed when it comes to the narrative. >> as a matter of fact, if the new york times and others were to apply their own standard to the new york times as michael goodwin pointed out in the new york post this past week, it has a very strong history of racism and strong history connection to slavery. we would have to burn down the new york t

"the new york times" has some deep financial ties to china. their biggest -- 17% investment by a person who saved the paper from bankruptcy a few years back and he has deep ties to china. also a very odd op-ed in the paper last month very pro-china actually glorifying their crackdown on hong kong. we need to look at all of this. >> trace: stay on topic of the actual -- let's put this on the screen here. cbs, zero, nbc, zero.

"the new york times". go. then shapiro outstanding book, how to destroy america in three easy steps. you cannot be more timely. my question to you was reality versus ideology. how are these soft marxist, progressive, one-party rule cities how are they doing when it comes to individual liberty and choice inequality and one creation that magnificent paradise that they keep talking about. >> they are doing horribly. the fact is when the disintegration take over an area it isn't about building anything new. in fact, the failure is the goal. you want things to fail because any success is going to be educated to the broader american system and the broader american system is bad so what you actually want is more on success. want people who aren't getting jobs and want more inequality and if markham occurs that's a good case to be made that the entire system is to blame. it's of beautiful thing about being a utopian living in someone else's system paid anything that is bad that happens can then be blamed on the sy

you read the op-ed in the new york times. besides china, biden made some news when it comes to foreign policy. the 2015 jcpoa has been hanging on by an absolute threat. biden is going to try to salvage it. he stood by what he said to cnn and that is that if iran returns to strict compliance on the nuclear deal, obviously not going ahead with this bill, the united states would rejoin the agreement. you and i both know this is not going to be nearly as easy as it was in 2015. there has been a lot that has happened. manus: if we look at the context of what biden has said on the china-u.s. relations, the assumption you and number of other people have had in interviews was, straight back into jcpoa, into resolution with the run, maybe these fast-track assumptions that have been made need to be questioned. annmarie: a lot of guests have set on this program that what is going to be forefront for the biden administration is getting domestically america back on track in terms of coronavirus, in terms of unemployment. foreign policy is

all time high prices and the new york times washington post m.s.n. b.c. c.n.n. were all pushing their rusa phobic conspiracy theories and dissuading folks from watching our show as a result many people around the world mexico latin america asia everywhere got in in the 100 countries that are to broadcast to and they have made millions we've made over a 100000 millionaires a big but not so much in the u.s. because the u.s. is blinkered by a slope of keynesian economics it's low with its low debt and it's weird because if you look at my background i've got almost 40 years all involved with wall street started on wall street been involved in markets finance and financial engineering for 40 years i invented the hollywood stock exchange i invented the current bank system for a staging speculative attacks which have now become popular in other words i'm probably the single greatest expert in the field of digital currencies and pickling in the world and that's provable and that's obvious and that the new york times. the paper of record chose to keep their p

all time high prices and the new york times washington post m.s.n. b.c. c.n.n. were all pushing their rusa phobic conspiracy theories and dissuading folks from watching our show as a result many people around the world next ago lattimer. asia everywhere got in in the 100 countries that are to broadcast it and they've made millions we've made over a 100000 millionaires and declined but not so much in the us because the us is blinkered by its love of keynesian economics it's a love of the fed it's a load of debt and it's weird because if you look at my background i've got almost 40 years on wall involved with wall street started on wall street been involved in markets finance and in the financial engineering for 40 years i invented the hollywood stock exchange i invented the current bank system for a staging speculative attacks which have now become popular in other words i'm probably the single greatest expert in the field of digital currencies and pickling in the world and that's provable and that's obvious and that the new york times the paper of re

"the new york times" that her vengeance, it seems. was it fair for mimi groves to be forced to withdraw from the college of her team to make dreams for a racial slurs she made years ago when she was onls old? >> you just hit on it, julie. when she was 15 years old. no one is excusing the use of racial slurs here. in this case, this happened in 2016. she has since apologized for it. i imagine she has evolved from it. when you are 15, i'm sure we've all said things that we didn't understand the impact of those words. for her to go to tennessee, you have to understand, to be on that cheerleading team, their national champs. this is something she has worked for her whole life. for jimmy galligan in the situation to put out this video on snapchat and tiktok and twitter, remember, if you have a phone that's a way to broadcast to the world by the press of one button paid a lot of people saw that. how is this now a story of that video was released in june and this happened 6-7 months ago? why are we talking about it now if you are "the new yo

the new york times isn't failing. i'm a financial journalist. you look at their stock, during the trump presidency, the four years, the stock has increased five-fold. just year-to-date, up 51% for that stock. they are not failing. of course, president trump loves to put out there -- on wednesday he tweeted fox is dead. yeah, if this is his idea of being dead, just a couple hours later, the nielsen ratings were released and fox smashed all records in cable news, the highest rated year in the history of cable news. so, you know, this is all wishful thinking and he's in fantasy land if he thinks either are going away. howie: very much alive. you're right, being anti-trump has been a business model. anthony scar new yo scaramucci a fierce critic, he says that right now the media must stop giving him attention, must stop covering him, no more videos, audios, attention is trump's objection of jen and lifeblood. how do you stop covering the president of the united states who has a month to go. >> how do you ban the voice of somebody who got 74 million

the new york times' executive editor says he now believes chaudry was a con artist. ashley carman is a senior reporter at the verge. she told me how damaging this affair has been. i mean, this is definitely not an ideal situation for the new york times, or for podcasting in general. i mean, right now, podcasting is such a hot space. we're seeing so many conversations around big narrative shows and i think this just kind of is an inflection point a little bit and sort of sobering to be like 0k, many news outlets outlets do narrative podcasts great and have amazing fact—checking departments, but also a reminder that we do need to treat audio the same way we would treat print or any other medium that is narrative and journalistic. yeah, and so some of those measures, those fact checking — the problem with all that, as everyone knows, that costs a lot of money and a lot of time. for sure, yes, it's definitely not an easy endeavour. it's something that you really do have to dedicate resources to. and of course, the temptation for people — notjust the new york times,

"the new york times" being on their death bed. and here we are. we're growing. they're growing. there are enormous signs of success for news organizations like ours around the country. but now i think there will start to see some success with the local news organizations as well as long as they have the right model and particularly for the commercial enterprises, they ask people to pay for the comprehensive coverage that they provide of communities. and there will be some nonprofit models as well. >> looking toward the inauguration, what is your post mortem of the trump presidency? you famously said, we're not at war against trump, we're at work. that's the "the washington post" view of handling and covering the trump years. what is your assessment now? >> that's what i believe. i believe we did our job. we did our job to find under the first amendment, that's why we have a first amendment of the country, essentially holding government accountable. and that's what we -- that's what we have done over the last four years. that's wha

all time high prices and the new york times washington post m.s.n. b.c. c.n.n. were all pushing their rusa phobic conspiracy theories and dissuading folks from watching our show as a result many people around the world mexico latin america asia everywhere got in in the 100 countries that are to broadcast to and they have made millions we've made over a 100000 millionaires and declined but not so much in the u.s. because the u.s. is blinkered by a slope of keynesian economics it's low with its low debt and it's weird because if you look at my background i've got almost 40 years all involved with wall street started on wall street been involved in markets finance and in financial engineering for 40 years i invented the whole i was started. change i invented the current bank system for a staging speculative attacks which have now become popular in other words i'm probably the single greatest expert in the field of digital currencies and pickling in the world and that's provable and that's obvious and that the new york times the paper of record chose to

for "the new york times." and also author of the "the new york times" best-seller, donald trump versus the united states, inside the struggle to stop a president. mr. schmidt, it's nice to see you. thanks for being here tonight. >> thanks for having me. >> so, mike, can i ask you what advisers the president is talking about? is this the sort of thing the white house is handling as the appropriate actions of the president and how this might affect the presidency? or is this the sort of thing the president is calling his buddies and yapping about? >> well, the president will talk to anyone about anything and relies on a variety of advisers and lawyers, people like chris ruddy who run a television network. so it's a range of people that the president is always talking to. but specifically on this parlden if he's going to move forward with these pardons, he would have to do it through the white house counsel's office because it's truly the ultimate expression of presidential power to use the pardon, to use the pow

i mean, this is definitely not an ideal situation for the new york times orfor situation for the new york times or for podcasting in general. i mean, right now, podcasting is such a hot space. we are seeing so many conversations around big narrative shows, and i think this is kind of an inflection point a little bit and would have sobering to be like, 0k, any of these outlets do narrative podcasts great and had an amazing fact checking departments, but also a reminder we do need to treat audio the same way we treat print or any other medium that is narrative and journalistic. some of those measures, those fa ct some of those measures, those fact checking — the problem with all of that, as everyone knows, that costs a lot of money and a lot of time. for sure, yes, definitely, it's not an easy endeavour and something you really do have to dedicate resources to. and of course, the temptation for people not just the new york times, of course, but anyone putting a podcast as well, owning a good story and it sounds great with potentially lucrative opportunities not just in advertising bu

the new york times executive editor says he now believes chaudry was a con artist. ashley carman is a senior reporter at the verge. she told me how damaging this affair has been. i mean, this is definitely not an ideal situation for the new york times, or for podcasting in general. i mean, right now, podcasting is such a hot space. we're seeing so many conversations around big narrative shows and i think this just kind of is an inflection point a little bit and sort of sobering to be like 0k, many news outlets outlets do narrative podcasts great and have amazing fact—checking departments, but also a reminder that we do need to treat audio the same way we would treat print or any other medium that is narrative and journalistic. yeah, and so some of those measures, those fact checking — the problem with all that, as everyone knows, that costs a lot of money and a lot of time. for sure, yes, it's definitely not an easy endeavour. it's something that you really do have to dedicate resources to. and of course, the temptation for people — notjust the new york times,

all time high prices and the new york times washington post m.s.n. b.c. c.n.n. were all questioning their russo phobic conspiracy theories and dissuading folks from watching our show as a result many people around the world mexico allowed to marry. asia everywhere got in in the 100 countries that are to broadcast it and they've made millions we've made over a 100000 millionaires and because but not so much in the us because the us is blinkered by its love of keynesian economics it's a love of the fed it's a love of debt and it's weird because if you look at my background i've got almost 40 years on wall involved with wall street started on wall street been involved in markets finance and in the financial engineering for 40 years i invented the hollywood stock exchange i invented the current bank system for a staging speculative attacks which have now become popular in other words i'm probably the single greatest expert in the field of digital currencies and pickling in the world and that's provable and that's obvious and that the new york times the p

to a new york times reader, you would have to advertise in the new york times. now it might be you go to ilovecats.com, and it can see you went to the new york times earlier in the day and it can show you a high value, fancy advert on a cheaper website. this is creepy for us because it means we are getting way more follows than we think we are. every website indirectly is exposing you to hundreds and hundreds of different people who can track you, every, single click. it's also worrying for the people who make the contacts. you are no longer the best place to target your readers. people can try to track you, see you are someone in a desirable target market, and let's say you look at the property section of website, you might get high value property adverts. but then they can advertise in cheaper places, and so the rewards for quality are broken by the internet. but because it makes a lot of money for tech companies, is not really in their interest to fix it. >> you quote a frank eliasson as saying "let's face it, everybody's been trying to own the internet in so

you can just do that with the "new york times." the "new york times" has better d.o.j. and f.b.i. sources than all members of congress put together. but not a word. not a word. we know that their investigation is ongoing. where is this enthusiasm for oversight, for what the media claims its job is? where is the questions? other than the fox reporter, who is asking biden or remember back to russia. you couldn't walk from one committee room to another without people saying are you going to support mueller? are you going to support the investigation? you hear any of that going on, on capitol hill? i don't hear any of it. >> harris: we have not heard, have not seen it. thank you for the homework assignment between decorating butter cookies. i will do all of what you told me investigatively. the f.b.i. hours from now is set to brief house minority curve mccarthy on democratic congressman's eric swalwell's past ties with a suspected chinese spy. here is mccarthy earlier. >> what do the communist chinese have on the democrats that is so powerful? so powerful that they focused on the pers

all time high prices on the new york times washington post m.s.n. b.c. c.n.n. we're all pushing their rusa phobic conspiracy theories and dissuading folks from watching our show as a result many people around the world mexico allowed to marry. asia everywhere got in in the 100 countries that are to broadcast it and they've made millions we've made over a 100000 millionaires and because but not so much in the us because the us is blinkered by its love of keynesian economics it's lower the fed it's low debt and it's weird because if you look at my background i've got almost 40 years on wall involved with wall street started on wall street been involved in markets finance and in financial engineering for 40 years i invented the hollywood stock exchange i invented the current bank system for a staging speculative attacks which have now become popular in other words i'm probably the single greatest expert in the field of digital currencies and pickling in the world and that's provable and that's obvious and that the new york times the paper of record cho

and sandra also key contributor to this book and a new york times reporter. i will be asking questions but i encourage the panel to feel free to jump in and chat at any time and audience, please keep in mind after the conversation, you will have a chance to ask questions and you can ask them now so now let's get things started. thank you for joining me this is awesome. we will just start talking about the process and how it came together, how you want the process to reflect your goals of the book and how your effort to broaden the lens of suffrage. >> when we realized it was the h anniversary of women voting which is something like a lot of us have not thought about. suffrage is a boring word and also problematic because if you look at a lot of history books and the terms suffragist you see a lot of primarily white women in white dresses we at the story was so much more bigger and interesting and we really wanted to tell the story. so we put together a group of women writers and said about to tell as many stories as we could of women who haven't been talked a

why are we reading about that in "the new york times"? because the fbi and doj decide when to leak and when not to leak. this has been going on since 2018, and you need to tell me "t know about it or didn't ask abot it? i think the reality is they just didn't write about it. they knew about it, but they didn't want him to win, and the best way to hurt him is, number one, print his tax returns, which is a crime also, by the way, and to cover up for his family. >> martha: there was a very concerted effort on the part of the media to squash the story anyway possible. this is the cover of "the new york post." it says "censored, facebook and twitter boxed post expose and hunter biden filed." with the southern district of new york looking at hunter biden point securities fraud. here is the -- watch this. >> this was a policy around distribution of materials. we did not want twitter to be a distribution point for hacked materials. >> we try not to be arbiters of what is true ourselves, but we have partnered with fact-checkers around the world to

we've had the new york times we've had m.s.m. b.c. tell thousands millions of americans to not watch us that we are giving them misinformation and dison from ation whereas over at the new york times paul krugman said big queen is a ponzi scheme and it's inferior to the dollar because the dollar he said his words is backed by men with guns rachel maddow also she never told you about because she never told you about how to liberate yourself and she instead was telling you that we are a benevolent empire and back us we're going to invade yemen and save the women and children there we're going to invade syria and save the women and children there we're going to invade libya everywhere like it's all about violence and relentless pessimism that they sell you this whole time i think about that for a 2nd so we started talking about decline of the dollar back in 2011 we've been pushing it telling people about a 10 dollars 200 dollars 2000 dollars 10000 dollars it's still a buy at these new all time high prices and the new york times washington

absolutely, he's a kid and "the new york times," he got "the new york times" to support his insane vengeance plan. people are going to go after him, especially if "the new york times" encourages this. >> sandra: her lawyer was saying there was a rush to judgment. here she an he is. >> she worked most of her young adult life to be in this school. that was taken away from her and what can only be described as a rush to judgment. >> sandra: she says this, she is remorseful for what she said, what i said several years ago as an adolescent and a 32nd clip was wrong, irresponsible, degrading and i take full responsibility for my actions and will continue to learn and understand the true meaning. her attorney says there should have been a proper investigation, more contacts should have been provided. this was a hasty judgment made on public pressure. >> the university is just scared and they reacted as somebody afraid of outrage. part of the problem is that we don't consider intent whatsoever. that's ironic because the crime laws are not just murder. it's about, what was your intent? what did you t

i don't even go to "the new york times" anymore just go to twitter. as an activist and to run a column for forbes i love my relationship with forbes. does have some challenges but nevertheless i can publish articles more than environmental articles in "the new york times". and to have 2 million views even though don't work at "the new york times". and what polarizes society. and those that are not clearly left or right issues. and with that technology. and housing is another is a conservative or liberal because we have those not in my backyard people but those other elements of that and that things are more liberal or conservative and others. but at the beginning of that i could social media for this and like plato's discussion of medicine which is a poison our medicine and both. so we are in an interesting time and social media in is making this madness. but it can also be very creative. . . . . too long of ao care about right now and it made it more diverse. but at the same time, there was a section on the concept a very simple formula that was prov

"the new york times" has developed that story considerably this evening, and so, we're getting more flesh on the bones there from that redacted court document, in terms of what that investigation may have consisted of and who may have been in its crosshairs. we're working on that story right now, working on adding our own reporting to the extent that we can, and we'll have that for you coming up within the course of this hour. >>> but i want to start tonight by introducing you to chris rosquist, registered nurse at intermountain health care, which is in murray, utah. murray is just south of salt lake city. >> it just is, you know, day after day, these patients are here fighting, you know, some losing their lives and others, you know, regaining their freedoms and ability to, you know, care for themselves. i mean, the one thing that comes to mind is exhausting. with these people here, they're not here for three days or a week, you know. they're here for weeks and months at a time. >> well, we've noticed that covid does to our patients is they're shut out from everybody. even the care provid

here's "the new york times" in march. speak of the bookcase has emerged as a background of choice for politicians, executives, celebrities, and anyone else hoping to add a touch of authority to their amateurish video feed to. >> it tells us with they are intellectually curious about, how much they are following the trends and how much they sort of have their own pursuits. the one that really got me is cate blanchett's complete 20 volume oxford english dictiona dictionary. i think we always thought of her as a rare creature in that heightened the sense. >> mark: got to love that cate blanchett. some people are actually paying professionals to arrange and dress their bookshelves so they can look as smart as cate blanchett. they show up with rows upon rows of dusty hardcovers behind them. it's turned into something of an industry in washington, d.c. steve krakauer is an editor of the fourth watch and we always enjoy releasing the krakauer. i can't stand this. it sums up everything that's most grotesque and pompous and porten

for "the new york times." and also author of the "the new york times" best-seller, donald trump versus the united states, inside the struggle to stop a president." mr. schmidt, it's nice to see you. thanks for being here tonight. >> thanks for having me. >> so, mike, can i ask you what advisers the president is talking with this about? is this the sort of thing the white house is handling as the appropriate actions of the president and how this might affect the presidency? or is this the sort of thing the president is calling his buddies and yapping about? >> well, the president will talk to anyone about anything and relies on a range of advisers, lawyers, people inside the white house, people outside the white house, people like chris ruddy who runs a television network. so it's a range of people that the president is always talking to. but specifically on this pardon if he's going to move forward with these pardons, he would have to do it through the white house counsel's office because it's truly the ultima

all time high prices and the new york times washington post a.b.c. c.n.n. were all pushing their rusa phobic conspiracy theories and dissuading folks from watching our show as a result many people around the world mexico latin america asia everywhere got in in the 100 countries that are to broadcast to and they've made millions we've made over a 100000 millionaires a big point but not so much in the u.s. because the u.s. is blinkered by a slope of keynesian economics it's low with its low debt and it's weird because if you look at my background i've got almost 40 years all involved with wall street started on wall street been involved in markets finance and in financial engineering for 40 years i invented the hollywood stock exchange i invented the current bank system for a staging speculative attacks which have now become popular in other words i'm probably the single greatest expert in the field of digital currencies and pickling in the world and that's provable and that's obvious and that the new york times the paper of record chose to keep their

all time high prices and the new york times washington d.c. c.n.n. were all pushing their. conspiracy theories and dissuading folks from watching our show as a result many people around the world mexico latin america asia everywhere got in 100 countries that are broadcast it and they have made millions we weighed over one $100000.00 millionaires and declined but not so much in the u.s. because the u.s. is blinkered by its love of keynesian economics it's a lot of the. debt. the u.s. congress has now passed a long awaited $900000000000.00 coronavirus stimulus package the deal now just needs to be signed off by donald trump who has struck the agreement to the weekend after months of negotiations the 2nd relief and since the start of the pandemic he's kind of movement takes a look at the fine details we've got a situation where not only are people dying on a daily basis but people's jobs are in jeopardy unemployment numbers are rising however members of the u.s. congress are reassuring us that they have put together a relief package help is on th

the new york times is not reporting on it. is the media covering up because these are the guys that are leaking to them their stories. lai have been a journalist 435 years. i know how sourcing goes in washington, d.c. i know how favoritism is played. the guys giving you the information and then you go soft on them. i have seen it happen time and again. is that what is happening here? >> yes. they areg going soft on democras and they cannot say anything bad about them. there is a whole lot of money. not so much a noose, but media from china into hollywood and that curbs their ability. you do not see a lot of movies about the cultural revolution anymore and there is a reason for that. liz: sorry. i hate talking about myself. i hate doing that. it's about the security of american families across the country. i,s appreciate you coming on and tolerating what i just said. critics now blasting the media. democrats in the so-called experts for bundling and misleading you want vaccine readiness. i will show you just how badly they blew

the other one, "the new york times" has a reputation of influence in europe and new york. and there's, the editor of that paper is a huge supporter of lincoln by this time. he was working on this major book about him. down becauselow somebody had published abraham lincoln's jokes just before this. so he had to wait to publish his. so it would not crowd the market. the other one was a paper that nistvery much an abolitio paper, and more strongly than abraham lincoln himself. they were constantly saying, "it's time for you for take a stronger stand against slavery." the newboys would flood them through the streets of new york and they would go off on trains, you know, across the country. and they would go on the boats, the scotia, going overseas to spread the information of what was going on in the united states at this war time. the one other thing that i want to talk about before we get to thatctual incident of , starts the book is there had been the draft riots of 1863. abraham lincoln had been conducting a war with just volunteers but in 1863 he realized he actually need

the headline on the story just posted at "the new york times" is this. trump associates said to have been scrutinized in suspected pardon scheme. hmm. here's the lede. quote, the justice department investigated as recently as this past summer the roles of a top fund-raiser for president trump and a lawyer for his son-in-law, jared kushner, in a suspected scheme to offer a bribe in exchange for clemency for a convict, specifically a tax crimes convict. two people familiar with the inquiry said it concerned efforts by the lawyer for mr. kushner, abbe lowell, and the fund-raiser, elliott broidy, who pled guilty in october to a charge related to a different scheme, to illegally lobby the trump administration. elliott broidy is a figure who has popped up in a lot of trump-related scandals since before the inauguration. broidy pled guilty to a scheme to lobby the trump administration on behalf of undisclosed foreign clients weeks ago, not long ago. broidy was also a key part of the presidential inaugural committee, which has come under lots of legal scrutiny.

thanks, "new york times." i'm sure workers everywhere this time of year are going to run to your website and pour over every twisted tale you tell. what's remarkable about this editorial is that the words "president trump" appear nowhere in it. american workers trusted him to improve conditions for them. furthermore, in the first term he succeeded. it just blows away expectations. >> this is the best i've ever seen in my life. >> you can't contradict that this is the best numbers of our lives? >> getting support from both democrats and republicans. >> how significant is this deal? not just for israel for that matter, but for the region the region. >> pretty significant. in fact, it's historic. >> a new narrative, a narrative of hope and prosperity. >> laura: the times complains a about wage stagnation. but those complaints are out of date. we've told you many times, real median household income in the united states grew by $6,00000 from 2016 to 2019. forgive me for actually dealing in facts tonight. they incre

in "the new york times" gleefully piled on to rejoice in her plight. candace owens has some thoughts aboute. the story and she joins us, always great to see candace. this is a harsh and unforgiving world. i would not want to be 15 years old again in this new world, candace. >> i couldn't agree with you more, i feel positively blessedi that i grew up without twitter and social media where these things could be captured and childrenhi are low mike no longr allowed to grow up and be children. let me just say this about the story, it really is indicative of just how far we are diving into this culture. when adults are aiding this culture beyond just trying to destroy adults,st be on "the new york times" just trying to destroy conservatives, republicans and finding tweets from 25 years c ago. now they're going after children. were talking about a girl who's 15 years old and it should be set for clarification that she used the slur not directed towards black people, that meant to be derogatory but she used it to be cool, right? so she said this in the same c

hunter biden had time for an interview with the "new york times" about his art career. he hasn't had time to answer senator johnson's questions and respond to a senate inquiry. and the "new york times" doesn't seem to have the space in its paper or online to do a single story about eric swalwell and what is going on. what is your take on this mess and the lack of the coverage from the "new york times"? and the other liberal media. >> thank you, jason. great to see you. matt had great points about the media. we are all seeing the degree of how it is affecting the national security. it's not just an irritant or we would rather have certain different kind of story. courtesy of the internet, fox news and the other elements in fair and balanced reporting we really now do know what is going on. we are able to judge what it is we are not being told. that has been the key throughout the years. this is what the media now apparently does well. it's lying by omission. so, as opposed to entity in our republic that it is supposed to hold the powerful to account, they now have thrown

biden told the new york times he wants to conduct a review of u.s. policy with beijing,. he said he would not make any immediate moves on tariffs imposed by president trump. a warning from president trump. he says he will veto the defense spending bill unless congress abolishes a law that protects tech companies from liability over most content that their users publish. president and his allies accused the tech giants of silencing conservatives. he made the accusation on twitter. global news 24 hours a day, on air and at bloomberg quicktake, powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in more than 120 countries, i'm ritika gupta. this is bloomberg. tom: thanks so much. equities, bonds, currencies, commodities. let's get right to it, a change to landscape from where we were five days ago, 10 days ago, where we were 90 days ago. it is real simple, with futures come off the record move yesterday. nasdaq 100 out to record highs yesterday. 10 year yield to four digits, .9228. john normand will join us in this hour. the dollar churning here, but nevertheless resilient. 1

"the new york times"'s sycophantic coverage of stalinist russia. the difference is you turn to a newspaper for reality, and you go to a bar to drink to forget that you ever made mistake of picking up "the new york times." but go ahead, the economy and new york and california is not yet totally destroyed. mandate, woke-media friendly theme bars, and in five years' time, i'll see you at the authentic irish pub, the potato famine, they offer you fish and chips, chips not included, the authentic french restaurant occupied byer the germans for fe years, and the authentic turkish food cart outside "the new york times" front door can"t reenact the blood he fallf constantinople f in 1453 on any passing "new york times" columnist. meanwhile, the most authentic dining experience in america can be found in those san francisco oupatio park let's we reported n yesterday, that are now full ofn derelicts and human waste, just like everywhere else in san francisco. the united kingdom and the european union have agreed to a post-brexit trading relationship. what do

a visiting professor at columbia university, featured in the new york post, new york times, addenda, links to l as far among many others. conversation, form and raise in jackson, mississippi, proposal in english and creative writing at the university, author of long division, how to slowly kill yourself and others in america. also the author of the memoir, heavy. shortlisted in the turkish rug. this book in 2018 of the undefeated new york times publisher's weekly npr the washington post, entertainment weekly, san francisco chronicle's and new york times. without further ado, join me in welcoming morgan. >> hi, everyone. >> hey, what's going on? >> i'm so excited to talk to about this book. i wish, i really wish we could have done this himself. >> i know. it is full circle for me because two he is, maybe two years ago, i was in conversation with you at the public library, now you are here with my book. >> you helped me. i mississippi through and through. i lived in new york state for like 15 years. every time i went to the city, it was always like the first time i get shaken, i don't

the professor, three democrats, the state of texas, they have problems in georgia, "the new york times," the ap. why would we use a system that everybody agreed socks or had problems is beyond me. i add and ask you today that there were people watching a internet connection in real time that they can't speak publicly and have signed affidavits to that. why? >> there's a number of reasons. some are within the government. some are possibly in different roles that require confidentiality. they are not in a position where they can come forward without certain protections in place. that's something that the government really needs to give them if they want to get to the truth of all the matters, with which we are gathering more evidence every day. >> sean: 's own, we really can't hear from them and they

to a new york times reader, you would have to advertise in the new york times. you go toht be ilovecats.com, and it can see you went to the new york times earlier in the day and it can show you a high value, fancy advert on a cheaper website. this is creepy for us because it means we are getting way more follows than we think we are. every website indirectly is exposing you to hundreds and hundreds of different people who can track you, every, single click. it's also worrying for the people who make the contacts. you are no longer the best place to target your readers. people can try to track you, see in a desirable target market, and let's say you look at the property section of website, you might get high value property adverts. but then they can advertise in cheaper places, and so the rewards for quality are broken by the internet. but because it makes a lot of money for tech companies, is not really in their interest to fix it. eliasson quote a frank as saying "let's face it, everybody's been trying to own the internet in some way." james: yes, frank was a c

york times when i went all over the new iraq you could probably go anywhere near about the best the gate you know have provided for 2 years and i know i am very big then i really think at least i have a time there i don't there much time jeffrey miron and grumpy sharyl attkisson recently in that barrack agree there had to be many such reporters who knew about this and decided to do nothing with it for 2 years beyond strategic leaking and that's what it's all but came to joe you know it's interesting from what we have heard from all of you the media is in the service of media and people that pay him and pay them and they're donors here but what about the public because the public is not as dumb as it is these people think i mean they feel so superior intellectually superior morally superior that they think it about who they're talking to and and i think that they will they are ruining the day because. as you know we look at this election which is not the topic of this program here but there's a lot of disillusion people here because of the role of the media go ahead joe there's no qu

york times"? that is why "the new york times" is now covering it. here is how serious the issue is. swalwell may have been going into so-called scifs, secure compartmentalized facilities that are heavily securitize. he is not allowed to bring his phone in there. this fang fang reportedly put an intern inside of his democrat office on the hill. that intern, who knows, could have been recording things down eric swalwell was hearing right when china was going full bore, full steam ahead on its belt and road push, christian. there is still a lot of questions. how come eric swalwell and democrats are saying, swalwell, you have to answer them? >> that's right. they should do it. this is typical of the coverup where democrats, liberals, progressives and lying media will accuse the other side of exactly what they're doing, accusing donald trump and republicans colluding with russia when in fact they're the ones colluding in the bedroom with chinese agents. you know, this is, this is very deadly serious. t

i'm glad that they are calling at "the new york times" and the university. as a culture we need to start to end this kind of scenario. none of us want to live in a world like this. >> julie: tomi, it makes sense to punish an adult who uses these kinds of words, but the girl was 15 years old at the time. this video was old. tomi, obviously the school caved to public pressure, which goes back to what the hell are the schools thinking? >> tomi: it's a failed attempt to cancel the cancel culture. i'm an absolutist, but this girl was 15 years old, she is more than what she said in a 3-second video, and i think it's important to understand the intent of her video. it wasn't to be racist, it wasn't to offend anyone. she said something stupid when she was 15 years old and that is her bad for doing so, are bad for posting it. reminding all young people, do not post things if you don't want it to live on the internet forever. at the end of the day, she's not racist. she doesn't deserve to have this brought up yet again, her life destroyed. this is enough. shame on "th

york times." a lot of people hadn't seen the attorney general for a matter of weeks. some just assumed he had entered witness protection. so at minimum today's interview with the associated press is proof of life. why do you reckon he said what he said today, was instantly branded an attempt at reputation repair having thoroughly trashed his reputation thus far in office? >> i don't know that attorney general barr really cares about his reputation at this point. i do think what you saw was a really carefully -- a carefully set of messages on the same day related on the one hand push back on the messaging that the election was stolen. i do think there are republicans and friends of bill barr who have said to him quietly and privately why can't you put a stop to this? you're one of the very few people who can come out and say as the chief law enforcement officer in the land this is wrong. but at the same time he came out with other messaging that helps him thread the needle to continue to be part of

"the new york times" cover of stalinist russia. return to a newspaper for reality and you go to a bar to drink to forget that you ever made the mistake of picking up "the new york times," but go ahead, the economy in new york and california is not yet totally destroyed, woke friendly feeding bars and in five years' time, i will see you at the authentic irish pub where the bar menu offers fish and chips, chips not included, the authentic french restaurant that's been occupied by the germans were five years and all you can smell as the sauerkraut and the authentic turkish food cart outside "the new york times" front door to reenact the bloody fall of constantinople in 1453 on any passing "new york times" columnist. meanwhile, the most authentic dining experience in america can be found in those san francisco patio parks that are now full of needles and sleeping derelicts and human waste just like everywhere else in san francis san francisco. the united kingdom and the european union have agreed that post brexit training relationship,

thanks, "new york times." i'm sure workers everywhere this time of year are going to run to your website and pour over every twisted tale you tell. what's more mark about this editorial is that the words "president trump" appear nowhere in it. american workers trusted him to improve conditions for them. furthermore, and the first term, he succeeded. it just blows away expectations. speak of this is the best i've ever seen in my life. >> you can't contradict that this is the best numbers of our lives? >> getting support from both democrats and republicans. >> how significant is this deal? not just for israel for that matter, buter f, but for the ree region. >> pretty significant. in fact, it's historic. >> a new narrative, a narrative hope and prosperity. >> laura: the times complains about wage stagnation. but those completes are out of date. we've told you many times, real median household income in the united states grew by $6,000 from 2016 to 2019. forgive me for actually dealing in facts tonight. they incr

and most of us take in naming go to the new york times emerges the new twitter. and as an activist and a journalist, have taken part rent this column for forbes. eleven a relationship with. but it has challenges there . good unless i'm able to publish articles that are much more widely read in environmental articles new york times. and i know is a seen traffic on them. if i can get 2 million views even though i don't work at the new york times just because i'm writing about things that people care about . similarly the one hand it's incredibly polarized society we live in . and on the other hand is just a bunch of things are not clearly left or right issues right now. i think the nuclear this one of them. not clear that that is a traditionally, traditionally bipartisan technology then republican and now democrats supported. housing is another issue i don't know if it's conservative or liberal. because the company we have with liberal and conservative. i think there's other elements of that . very interested in them. ... ... >> and with that initiative had you mak

the new york times' executive editor says he now believes he was a con artist. ashley carman is a senior reporter at the verge. i asked her how damaging it is for such a high profile podcast to be exposed as fraudulent. i mean, this is definitely not an ideal situation for the new york times, or for podcasting in general. i mean, right now, podcasting is such a hot space. we're seeing so many conversations around big narrative shows and i think this just kind of is an inflection point a little bit and sort of sobering to be like 0k, many news outlets outlets do narrative podcasts great and have an amazing fact—checking department, but also a reminder that we do need to treat audio the same way we would treat print or any other medium that is narrative and journalistic. yeah, and so some of those measures, those fact checking — the problem with all of that, as everyone knows, that costs a lot of money and a lot of time. for sure, yes, it's definitely not an easy endeavour. it's something that you really do have to dedicate resources to. and of course, the tem

all time high prices and the new york times washington d.c. c.n.n. were all pushing their. conspiracy theories and dissuading quotes from watching our show as a result many people around the world mexico latin america asia everywhere got it in 100 countries that are broadcasted and they have made millions we've made all rounder 1000 millionaires a big point but not so much in the u.s. because the u.s. is blinkered by its love of keynesian economics. is dead. welcome back russia has expend the list of e.u. representatives banned from entering the country the move is a response to european sanctions against russian government figures which were imposed over the alleged poisoning of opposition figurehead i mix in a volley are to seal it turn go picks up the story. the russian diplomats have called the punitive measures taken by europe against individuals that the e.u. is blaming for links to the alexina volly case unlawful and unacceptable besides this moscow is stressing that the european nations behind these sanctions have not shown anything to

the new york times, one hundred 30 pulitzers. the wall street journal, 37 pulitzers. the washington times, zero. host: we will go to alexandria, louisiana. a republican. do you have a question for bill gertz? caller: i just wanted to say, that guy was nothing. look, i wish you would put on a show about the pardon board. this is my question for the times, because he's doing a fine job. i was a military police officer. i had top-secret clearance. in the 1980's, the russians tried something like this. weapon,e with this bio with this covid-19, to essentially destroyed president trump and the u.s. i would like to know, does he think this is a bio weapon engineered simply to destroy the west and stuff? have written extensively on this. i have interviewed senior officials with access to a lot of the most sensitive intelligence information. and i can tell you there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that this does link covid-19 outbreak to the chinese military. the problem is, the chinese government as it stonewalled the international community for nine months now, trying t

a contributor to the book and a new york times reporter. while he'll ask questions, i ask the panelists to feel free to jump in and chat with one another at anytime and audience, please keep in mind after the conversation, you have a chance to ask some questions and you can actually ask the questions now, just drop them into the-- drop them into the ask question feature you'll all be seeing in the stream. okay. let's get things started. thank you, panelists for joining me, this is awesome. so, i think we'll just start with talking about, you know, what the process for "finish the fight" was wanting to reflect your goals of the book and how they reflect your effort to broaden the lens of suffrage. veronica, if you want to take that. we'll get started. >> so when we realized it was the 100th anniversary of women voting, which is something a lot of us hadn't thought about. i mean, i think suffrage is kind of a boring word and it's also a kind of problematic word because if you look at a lot of history books and you look at it, you see a lot of