it is texas v. pennsylvania et al. the texas state motion to file a bill is denied for lack of standing under article three of the constitution. texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its election. all other pending motions are diss messed as moot. it goes on to say this. in my view we do not have discretion to deny the filing of the bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. see arizona versus california. i would therefore -- i would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint, but would not grant other relief, and i express no view on any other issue. so that's significant as well. that's the whole thing. that's the whole statement, a complete rejection of this texas attorney general's effort to try to undermine the outcome of the presidential election which saw joe biden win the election. jim acosta, i don't know if you are getting any reaction at the white house yet, but this is a huge slap in the face of t

from texas is recognized for one minute. i thank the ee: gentleman and the chairman of the ways and means committee for his distinguished leadership. thank our speaker for her persistent leadership and all of the democratic members and who lican members understand what this legislation is. payment urvivor cash or americans making under a certain amount, which means they're on the survivor pathway. haven't spoken to the constituents of, i believe, of ably 90% of the members this congress who have said they are on the edge and they're to go over. they can't pay their rent. food.an't buy they're in food distribution lines. before i came here sunday, i was in a place at a church and we were giving out food. i asked during the spring for $3,000. to go for $600 so that desperate americans could get enough to survive. i am supporting this. i ask my friends and colleagues aisle, sides of the recognize that when you are privileged to stand in a place ike this, where the constitutional fathers gave us he opportunity to lead this gover

if texas goes, then we are done, so, please, keep an eye on that. governor, great to see you tonight. thank you. >> governor abbott: thank you, tucker. >> mark: if texas goes, it's all over. tucker is quite right about that. and i don't believe there are people, even liberals, moving from texas to california. i want to see some video footage of that. up next, raymond arroyo is here to discuss the latest celebrity craze, adopting a foreign alter ego. that's next on this special edition of "tucker carlson tonight." ♪ welcome, today's discussion will be around sliced meat. moms want healthy... and affordable. land o' frost premium!!! no added hormones either. it's the only protein i've really melted with. land o' frost premium. fresh look. same great taste. ♪ >> mark: the past few weeks have shown that many public notables have been eager to adopt fraudulent identities. this week's example spent years pretending to be spanish. she is actually from massachusetts but took her rolew seriously enough that she pretended to forget the english word "cucum

if texas let me just read this idea of texas where a separate economy it would be the world's 10th largest ahead of color that they could go it alone if they really wanted to. you know that's true and if they did want to go it alone they could have a nice immigration system to keep all the californians out who are fleeing their destroyed states are going to start you know people hear all these california is going to texas text of the movie on meet everything's going great in texas california is obviously on the absolute verge of collapse it's hemorrhaging business hemorrhaging residents it's becoming at the real country but you know californians move to texas they vote lou they never learned that the we the reason why they got into the disastrous situation they were cliche is because they don't democrats they move to texas there so they keep voting democrat say with new york same story in their fleets a red state as well it would be a nice way to have immigration checks to preserve texas is values certainly with a wave of california is going to get it doesn't destroy our economy you know c

and we have the republic of texas. then in 1845, texas was annexed by the united states. in 1861, we had the confederacy in charge, and four years later, we were back to the united states. but probably the single factor that shaped san antonio's character and it's appearance and it's very being was its isolation on the texas frontier. we're inland, a couple hundred miles from the texas coast. and the only way to reach san antonio was by ox cart from the texas coast. and that took a couple of days when it wasn't raining. it was a very difficult city to get to. until san antonio finally got a railroad in 1877. at which point san antonio began to explode. the tourism business was one of the first that took off, because san antonio had been a familiar topic of magazines and other publications, periodicals in the united states. reporters would love to come to san antonio and report on what it looked like. this didn't please people in houston where the railroad came from. after the railroad came, one newspaper over there reported that hordes of people went to san antonio for a

rangers in the state of texas. we know he has talked about details, the problems of issues, anytime truth is important, discussion on criminal justice reform after the tragic murder of george floyd. and from jamie thompson, litzer prize-winning reporter who covered the incident in dallas in july of 2016 and she has also wrten for the magazine, and written great work in terms of the different individuals who were involved in the actual incident there whereas we know five police officers were actually killed as a result, and looks at the lives of officers, their families, humanizes them and looks at the issues relating to one of the protesters there and one of the african-american physicians involved as a lead trauma surgeon when officers were brought in after they were shot and all that has changed, she uses one of the individuals, police officer, a negotiator, with the shooter that night, extensive conversations in many ways, in having the conversation. let me start out with the order that i went through and ask ea

the gentlewoman from texas is recognized. ms. jackson lee: just for a want to r. speaker, i ask unanimous consent that all members may have five to slative days in which revise and extend their remarks and insert extraneous material 3884.. just for a moment, mr. speaker, marijuana is not a gateway drug. withoutker pro tempore: objection. ms. jackson lee: it's not a gateway drug. scientific le evidence demonstrating that the use of marijuana does not cause other illicit substances. according to the national abuse, the drug majority of marijuana users do not use other harder substances. not have any provision to sell marijuana to children. i'm delighted to yield one johnson, a . distinguished member of the house judiciary committee. you.ohnson: thank the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for one minute. madam nson: thank you, chair. i rise in support of the more act. targeting drugs communities of color, primarily, advent of d in the the prison industrial complex consumed theon and lives of countless individuals

, representing the state of texas. i want to thank you for your leadership. i want to thank the front-line workers i had a chance to visit with earlier and all the doctors and nurses, whether it be here more across the entire state of texas, for being on the frontlines of this word is the pandemic. they put their lives on the line, helped the lives of others. they have been at the front of the line for vaccines we have been distributing across the entire state of texas. by the end of this week, we will have distributed more than 800,000 vaccines across texas. the end of this month, there will be more than one million vaccine distributed across the state of texas and then in the coming months, in january and february, the number of vaccines will just continue to increase. there will come a time when there will be availability for everybody to have a vaccine. we want to make sure that people in the state of texas can have trust and confidence in this vaccine. along those lines, there was a report that came out recently t

you could also take it from texas' senior u.s. senator, john cornyn, who told reporters about this effort today, quote, i frankly struggle to understand the legal theory of it. why would a state, even such a great state as texas, have a say so on how other states administer their elections?" why, indeed, senator cornyn? why, indeed? utah republican senator mitt romney put a finer point on it tonight on these comments this evening to nbc news. >> madness. it's just simply madness, which is the idea of supplanting the vote of the people with partisan legislators is so completely out of our national character that it's simply mad. of course, the president has the right to challenge results in court, to have recounts, but this effort to subvert the vote of the people is dangerous and destructive to the cause of democracy. >> dangerous and destructive to the cause of democracy. it's madness. it's madness. it's mad. so, that's the texas case brought to the supreme court, which president trump is using the kamala harris birther lawyer to

that is not the signal that the great state of texas should send. thank you. [applause] >> is there any other discussion on the motion to amend? seeing none, we will now move to a vote. for mr.lectors voting pickle's motion to amend, which the motion is to remove the words "moral cowardice" from the resolution, please raise your hand. the secretary of staff -- please keep them held as the secretary of staff tallies the vote. would you please keep your hands vote?your you may all lower your hands now. 28 for the motion. the motion to amend -- ok. would all those voting against the motion to amend please raise your hand? you may lower your hands. it appears the vote is 29 for the resolution. nine against. one absent. the motion passes. mr. ramsey, you are now recognized to make a motion. >> it is kind of lonely up here. yes, mr. chairman, members. this issue had come up in some discussions over the last 24 hours. and there were some language that had been proposed to take out that "moral cowardice" term. if we simply leave it the way we just amended it, physical

[laughter] the liberals are leading texas and the conservatives coming from california to texas. >> tucker: i should say, i am from california. i would be very wary of letting people like me in, but good luck. certainly of texas goes, we are done. so please keep an eye on that. governor, great to see you tonight, thank you. >> thank you, tucker. >> mark: if texas goes, it's all over. tucker is quite right about that. and i don't believe there are people, even liberals, moving from texas to california. i want to see some video footage of that. up next, raymond arroyo is here to discuss the latest liberty praise indoctrinating a foreign alter ego. that is next on this special edition of "tucker carlson tonight." flush ♪ welcome, today's discussion will be around sliced meat. moms want healthy... and affordable. land o' frost premium!!! no added hormones either. it's the only protein i've really melted with. land o' frost premium. fresh look. same great taste. ♪ >> mark: the past few weeks have shown that many public notables have been eager to adopt foreign identities. this week, the com

up next, author discussion of race and law in texas. >> welcomeo the session of the 20 fifth annual texas book festival. today, we are pleased to address and discuss some very important books in reference to the criminal justice system. the authors being

the speaker pro tempore: the yields n from texas back. the gentleman from texas, mr. thornberry, reserves. from washington, mr. smith, is recognized. mr. smith: i thank you, mr. chairman. pleased to yield one minute to the gentlewoman from new york, mrs. maloney. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from new york is minute.ed for one mrs. maloney: mr. speaker, i ise to speak on an important aspect of this bill. my corporate transparency act is important anti-corruption, anti-money 20 years. bill in when a terrorist cell or organization wants to move or hide money, they usually right here in the united company.th a shell so the same terrorist groups the united attack states are using our own finance system to those a -- those attacks. appalling and it has to stop. y bill will end the abuse of anonymous shell companies in the u.s. by requiring companies to beneficial ir true owners to the treasury department at the time the is formed. i want to thank my negotiating crapo, , chairman ranking member brown, chairwoman waters, and ranking member congratulate the chairma

you tell us this texas lawsuit has no merit. tell us why. >> we worked with the staff and to understand the merits of it and the purpose of it. i'm not a lawyer. in my terms it's described as texas attorney general was not comfortable with the way that we operated our election here in georgia, despite the count and two additional recounts and have included us in the suit. i think it's hard to imagine that, you know, that is be taken up by the supreme court but we will let them weigh in on that. it could be at any time. another point to make as a republican, one of our standards is really state's rights and to watch this, another state trite to reach into our state and three other states is concerning and certainly i think long term would have bigger ramifications if carried through. >> what is amazing all 50 states and the district of columbia have now officially certified the count in their states and they have suggested that they have the results that are official, including georgia and biden won in your state as we know. the

i am texas secretary of state and i have the honor of serving 113th texas secretary of state and i want to thank all of you for being here. many of you have traveled a great distance to be with us here. welcome to your texas state capitol. regardless of where in our state you have come from, you have all come for the same reason and that is to fulfill your duties as a lector. the u.s. constitution, our nation's bedrock document first ratified in 1788 dictates that electors shall meet in their respective states to cast votes for president and vice president halloween the general election for federal offices in years in which it is on the ballot. each state is entitled to a number of electors likely proportional to its representation in congress. which is determined in part by the u.s. census. toas therefore is entitled 38 electoral votes. as our state electors, you are all past and entrusted with the duties with which texas has been a part of since being brought into the united states in 1845. for 175 years, collectors from our state have cast their vote on behalf of of the electorate re

we do a lot of partnerships with texas a&m university. we have exhibits that are here long-term and short-term. we do lots of children's education, and we even have some live animals. so i would like to show you a few things about our museum that we are so proud of. if you look over this direction, you will see a mural that we are incredibly proud of. it was done by a nationally recognized artist, painted on site. it has been here since about 1993, 1995, and it is the only place where you can see the brazos valley as it was 12,000 years ago and realize that some of the animals that are portrayed in the mural where the predecessors of our modern species. 12,000 years ago, we have lions, tigers, and bears in the brazos valley. that is something a lot of our visitors really enjoy, looking at the 50 different species that are portrayed in the mural. if you look hard enough, you can even see the early peoples that lived here during that time. one of the things in our collection that we are very proud of is the ice age mammal collection. this m

with the texas a.g. to tell the u.s. supreme court that the election results from four states that went for biden should just be thrown out, they should just be nullified, the electoral college vote shouldn't happen, and the vote in those four states shouldn't count. in addition to that, it's now more than 100 republican members of congress -- i believe it's 106 of them -- who have now signed on to a friend of the court brief in this supreme court case in support of what the texas attorney general and these other republican states are asking from the court, which is to throw out the election results from georgia, pennsylvania, michigan, and wisconsin, all of which were won by joe biden. the republican congressman who whipped for signatures on that brief told all the republicans in congress when he was asking them to sign onto that thing that president trump was, quote, anxiously awaiting the final list to review, meaning president trump is watching to see if he'd sign on to this brief or not. you'd bette

he was born september 15th, 1860 in victoria county, texas. daniel webster wallace saw cattle being driven, et cetera, that way, and convinced his parents that he would like to join them. i don't know if you have, like, a 12, 13 or 11-year-old son or somebody that you say, well, he wants to do this and that, and i will just let him go. matter of fact, some people would be looking for you and they would not be there to give you any kind of awards. that would be very bad. this was not uncommon. especially if you knew the rancher moving the cattle and felt he would be in good hands, and again, webster made that trip. later he connects with a cattleman named clay mann. he had a great big 80 on the side of his cattle, and he is known as 80 john, and so people referred to him as 80 john. what he did, which was not the average practice, when he received his pay he had clay mann set aside a portion and not give all to it, so he could buy cattle and buy a ranch of his own. he was, again, well respected. when cattle was being moved from place to place,

with the texas a.g. to tell the u.s. supreme court that the election results from four states that went for biden should just be thrown out. they should just be nullified. the electoral college vote shouldn't happen, and the vote in those four states shouldn't count. in addition to that, it's now more than 100 republican members of congress -- i believe it's 106 of them -- who have now signed on to a friend of the court brief in this supreme court case in support of what the texas attorney general and these other republican states are asking from the court, which is to throw out the election results from georgia, pennsylvania, michigan, and wisconsin, all of which were won by joe biden. the republican congressman who whipped for signatures on that brief told all the republicans in congress when he was asking them to sign onto that thing that president trump was, quote, anxiously awaiting the final list to review, meaning president trump is watching to see if you sign onto this brief or not. you better si

does that present a challenge with texas case? >> because the state of texas is suing other states that's called original jurisdiction. the supreme court has original jurisdiction when a state is pitted against another state here in the state of texas sued those states and the 17 states are supporting that whether it's louisiana, missouri, alabama. all of us believe that the votes in our own states have been diluted. article 2 states that the legislature should be the one to set the elections, unfortunately in these states that did not happen and that's why the state of texas has asked the supreme court to take this case up. todd: you just helped everyone get one out of 300 multiple choice questions right on the bar exam. so thank you for that quickly on this last top pick go you see this affecting changing elections going forward. let's face it 2020 hasn't been a banter year for electoral integrity. >> it has not been a banner year at all. it is pair mounted to the success of the united states. americans particularly my state of

with the texas a.g. to tell the u.s. supreme court that the election results from four states that went for biden should just be thrown out. they should just be nullified. the electoral college vote shouldn't happen, and the vote in those four states shouldn't count. in addition to that, it's now more than 100 republican members of congress -- i believe it's 106 of them -- who have now signed on to a friend of the court brief in this supreme court case in support of what the texas attorney general and these other republican states are asking from the court, which is to throw out the election results from georgia, pennsylvania, michigan, and wisconsin, all of which were won by joe biden. the republican congressman who whipped for signatures on that brief told all the republicans in congress when he was asking them to sign on to that thing that president trump was, quote, anxiously awaiting the final list to review, meaning president trump is watching to see if you sign on to this brief or not. you better

the state of texas. i think -- i had a lot of problems with the way i saw voter suppression handled in texas. you didn't see either ag shapiro or myself filing lawsuits against texas. >> you put out a statement this evening that was given the moment quite conciliatory. you are hoping we go forward as the united states. the chairman of the texas gop put out a statement in which -- i will read you a sentence. perhaps law abiding states, meaning those who supported the texas lawsuit, should form a union of states that will abide by the constitution. that is a nonsense statement. i don't whether it's misinformation. we have a problem where 77% of republicans polled the other day felt there is something fraudulent about this election despite the 56 court cases in which not one instance of voter fraud has been discovered. what do we do? >> we are certainly right on the law. the law says joe biden will be sworn in as our next president on january 20th. we both agree that the problems are going to persist long a

have joined texas. first, though, coming up for free and fair election inside trump campaign's legal battle as they take their case right to the supreme court. plus tripping over kamala harris, the california senator's name giving people a hard time, it's making a buzz this morning. you're watching mornings with maria live on fox business. maria: welcome back, the fight for election integrity president trump announcing in a tweet that he will join the texas supreme court lawsuit aimed to delay the appointment of electors in georgia, pennsylvania, michigan and wisconsin saying that the election results are fraudulent this as 18 other states have joined the state of texas filing briefs with the supreme court to support this suit. joining me right now is reason senior editor robbie suaves, robbie, great to have you this morning, thanks very much for being here. your reaction to the texas lawsuit. >> yeah, it's very interesting lawsuit. i think the difficulty with it is that the supreme court is simply very

explain it to the people of texas. i will vote for it. but all that i am asking for is the right, as a united states senator, to have the vote, and again i ask you what is your problem with members of the united states senate, including a number of republicans who have already indicated they would like to vote for this, what's your problem with bringing that up as a single stand-alone bill, not merged with corporate liability or anything else? what's your problem with that? mr. cornyn: mr. president. the presiding officer: the senator for texas. mr. cornyn: mr. president, i would say to our colleague from vermont, this money is not targeted to people who suffered financial losses. it is not targeted to people who suffered financial losses. this money would go to members of your own staff if they meet the financial requirements. other government employees who have suffered no financial loss during this pandemic. we've all suffered in different ways during the pandemic, to be sure, but financially, this money is designed to help the people

all i can say is god bless texas. >> texas attorney general paxton said this is about more than the election of donald trump and threatens future elections, had this to say. >> all voters were disenfranchised by the fact the states did not follow the constitution or their own state laws. todd: 106 house republicans filing amicus briefs. and it they write it is the form duty of this course to provide an objective review of these anomalies and determine for the people of the constitution had been followed and the rule of law maintained. the four defendant states pushing back in their filing saying the state of texas has added his voice to the cacophony of bogus claims adding nothing in the history or structure of the constitution supports texas's view that it can dictate the manner in which four other states run their elections and donald trump's campaign also joining in laying out the argument this way. >> no longer the burden of proof for odd. it is the burden on their side to prove there wasn't fraud because the statutes that were put in place to prevent fraud they deliberately violated. >>

may god bless texas. and may he continue to bless the greatest country on earth, the united states of america. in god we trust. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, i seek unanimous consent to address the house for one minute. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman from michigan is recognized for one minute. mr. kildee: thank you, mr. speaker. look, we all know this pandemic is not over. it's far from over o. congress has to do its job. families, seniors, small businesses are suffering and they need congress to act now. before we leave town. when we were all home over the thanksgiving holiday, we all saw the same thing. the hard breaking images of people, people who never have had to seek help, standing in lines for food. millions of people out of work. small businesses are closing, we are losing small businesses every single day. and now federal unemployment benefits are set to expire. look, families

and i yield to my colleague from texas. >> mr. president, senator from texas. >> mr. president said to mike colleague from vermont, i have no problem with providing assistance, whether it is to public health officials who are trying to struggle with this pandemic or to provide money for the research for therapeutics for a vaccine which being distributed around the country. two individuals who i voted forin the 1200-dollar direct payment contain the cares expert i voted for the additional money that's provided for in the most recent covid-19 legislation. but this legislation the senator from vermont is advocating, would benefit households with annual income over $350,000. they w would get this money. and i would say in one way to deal with this because of course we negotiate back-and-forth on the last, covid-19 bill, nobody got everything they wanted. but if our colleagues on the other side of the aisle once an additional financial benefit to people making up thepl three to $50000, why not couplet with liability protection for people who are acting in good faith? this

across the hall in our texas capital is the texas senate. i can't help but think of our mutual friend, the former democrat lieutenant governor bob. his love for texas, and his ability to work in a bipartisan way, continue to be a model for all of us. the spirit of cooperation i have seen in this hall is what is needed in washington d. c.. it's the challenge of our moment. after a difficult election we must put politics behind us and work together to make the promise of america available for every one of our citizens. i'm optimistic that we can change the tone in washington d. c.. i believe that things happen for a bit of a reason and the long last few will pass the business and the part doesn't ship of the last few weeks. our nation must rise above a house divided, americans sheer goals and values much more important than any political disagreements. republicans want the best for our nation. and so democrats. our votes me differ. but not our hopes. i know america wants reconciliation and unity. i know americans want progress. we must seize t

across the hall in our texas capital is the state senate. i cannot help but think of our mutual friends, the former democrat lieutenant governor bob bullock. his love for texas and his ability to work in a bipartisan way continue to be a model for all of us. [applause] the spirit of cooperation i have seen in this hall is what is needed in washington dc. it is the challenge of our moment. after a difficult election, we must put politics behind us. work together to make the promise of america available for every one of our citizens. i am optimistic that we can change the tone in washington dc. i believe things happen for a reason. and i hope along the way, the last five weeks will heighten a desire to move beyond the bitterness and partisanship of the recent past. our nation must rise above a house divided. americans share hopes and goals and values far more important than any clinical disagreements. republicans want the best for our nation. and so do democrats. our votes may differ, but not our hopes. i know america wants reconciliation and

in addition to causing great concern for slaveholders in texas and louisiana the promise of freedom in mexico also posed a threat at the very heart of the union. in 1846 the united states provoked a war with mexico that two years later delivered what is now the american southwest to the united states. this included california, nevada, arizona, new mexico, part of utah and colorado and most historians accept this acquisition caused controversies that would lead to civil war. but historians have been debating why exactly the conquest of territory was so controversial but it isn't that complicated when you take into account the fact mexico had abolished slavery in 1837. nor did the congressman of both political parties and even some from slaveholding states like thomas hart of missouri refuse to reestablish slavery where it had been abolished as it had been in the former mexican territories. southern politicians on the other hand were quick to recognize that if that territory became a free state, the balance of power between north and south would be tilted in favor of the north. politicia

the state of texas. i think -- i had a lot of problems with the way i saw voter suppression handled in texas. you didn't see either ag shapiro or myself phiing l infiling law against texas. >> you put out a statement this evening that was given the moment quite conciliatory. you are hoping we go forward as the united states. the chairman of the texas gop put out a statement in which -- i will read you a sentence. perhaps law abiding states, meaning those who supported the texas lawsuit, should form a union of states that will abide by the constitution. that is a nonsense statement. i don't whether it's misinformation. we have a problem where 77% of republicans polled the other day felt there is something fraudulent about this election despite the 56 court cases in which not one instance of voter fraud has been discovered. what do we do? >> we are certainly right on the law. the law says joe biden will be sworn in as our next president on january 20th. we both agree that the problems are going to persist

texas is hitting back. they filed a response saying texas ag is wrong here. he says they are ignoring his arguments. this as more and more states are picking sides. the supreme court could rule at any moment. we've got this new serious border problem. what mexico is now doing that could cause border crimes to spike. also tonight we are awaiting development the fda may approvek at any time the pfizer covid-19 vaccine. thank you for joining us. i am elizabeth mcdonald. "the evening edit" starts right now. ♪ thank you for joining us. welcome to the show. you are watching a foxbusiness network. let's get it with guy. congressman, democrat senator chuck schumer andit ron wyden, should they be called out for putting political pressure on the fbi saying fbi do not investigate the hunter biden case. they did that before the t election. they sent a letter to christopher wray saying do not do it when there was already an active criminal investigation going on. did they metal here? >> of course a metal. thank you for having me on. just call me guy. these are republica

texas boosters say a company like oracle can save 32% on operating costs by making the move. >> texas has a great story to tell and a lot of very positive assets, from our talent pool, a reasonable regulatory climate. >> reporter: none of that lost on silicon valley. >> i do think it's a wake-up call. >> reporter: for now, it seems, texas has more swagger than ever. >> well, we'll say texas is the new frontier >> reporter: now, it's worth pointing out that a lot of these big companies -- oracle, hpe, they're not leaving silicon valley, not at all, not cutting jobs or anything like that it's just that the headquarters are going elsewhere. and that's a key point, as california tries to figure its way out of this. and oracle's founder, billionaire ceo larry ellison, he is leaving california, but he's going to a state that leads for quality of life -- hawaii. shep >> and scott, you measure the states every year for cnbc's top states for business report by the numbers, does texas live up to all the swagger? >> reporter: to some degree, it does, shep we know that it has a big and diverse ec

guest: in texas we have a saying which is "don't california my texas." a large part of my book looks at that trend exactly which is people moving from blue states to red states because of the cost of living in the quality of life and continuing to vote in favor of the policies that cause the problems in states they fled. when people make these moves, they're not thinking about politics. they're thinking my rent will be lower, the crime rate is lower, i got a new job in this city. time toeople all the live in texas for north carolina or florida you have got to reach out to your new neighbors and explain to them why your home state has flourished, why jobs -- why you to have jobs and still live pleasant lives. you need to reach out and explain these things because i fear if we don't and if these new domestic migrants do continue to vote in favor of the states they fled, these red states could go permanently blue. i am from new hampshire and it used to be a purple state. as bostonians moved to new hampshire, the whole bottom half became blue and now the sta

supreme court rejects i texas law suit to overturn america's presidential election president donald trump had called the suit the big one that would have kept him in office the question now being does the decision put an end to his hopes. held welcome the drug regulator the f.d.a. has approved the biotech pfizer corona virus vaccine as the u.s. readies itself to introduce mass immunization the vaccine was shown to be 95 percent effective in preventing. 19 in a light stage trial health care workers and elderly people in long term care are expected to be the 1st recipients vaccine gives cause for hope made the struggles with soaring in fiction rights and fatalities. president donald trump announced the decision in a video released light on friday he neglected however to mention by and take the german company that played a key role in developing the vaccine. i have really good news today our nation has achieved a medical miracle we have delivered a safe and effective vaccine in just 9 months this is one of the greatest scientific accomplishments in history it will save millions of lives and

the court ruled texas didn't have standing. i know a lot of people have been frustrat frustrated over that term standing. like, we've been harmed by this. >> standing means that you haven't been harmed. so, you don't have a right to sue. that's what it means. >> well, there hasn't been the opportunity to show the harm. >> you did have an opportunity. you submitted briefs. they looked at them, and said this does not support a claim of harm. that's what it means. and i think you know this. so, my question now becomes will you start doing the job? and act on getting relief money? at least get the vaccine money out the door. or are you going to hold on to try to take care of trump, even after he has lost? >> well, chris, it is possible for us around here to walk and chew gum, at the same time. >> but you haven't. >> well, we have the senate, which i am standing in their room, and the house trying to come together on these. we want to get the relief funding done. so we got to get mrs. p and, you know, our side, to agree with the sen

>> joe rogan left for texas earlier this year. kanye west has headquarters in wyoming, elon musk and tesla out as well but why wouldn't you want to stay in california? you have high taxes, wildfires, earthquakes, smog, no seasons, pollution, poor education, represented by nancy pelosi and gavin newsom, how could you not want to live in a place like california when you have that going? you can't beat it. >> where are you fleeing off to after this? >> very interesting concept which is i should not be up at 5:00 in the morning after this. nothing exciting today. todd: appreciate your time. carley: check out this magical winter wonderland, a couple transforming their home into a christmas castle featuring dazzling lights, check that out. they started building it in october. funds are going to several charities including frontline workers. >> in the next hour of "fox and friends first" marsha blackburn on the push for relief for main street. carley: a group of veterans making sure no weekend of natural disasters is left behind this hol

efforts by texas to overturn the u.s. presidential election or shall by the supreme court's senior g.o.p. officials call for a discussion on the state's continued place within the united states. 247 news live from moscow this is your r.t. international pleasure that your company my names you know me well our top story today. the french capital has been engulfed in renewed already a stove or a security bill police use water. fire tear gas as the situation really spiraled audit of control on saturday it's part of a wave of public anger over government plans to protect police officers by giving them extra powers and boosting surveillance. been covering the protests for us throughout the day. we've had huge tension sale in paris in the last hour where we have seen a number of what i would describe as smash and grab spy the police it's obviously much more organized not that you'll have a. members of the security forces going in to the crowds and crapping out individuals that they think of causing trouble or perhaps likely to c

the supreme court lawsuit brought by the texas attorney general seeking on behalf of the people of texas to flip the election results in a whole bunch of other states, in just enough swing states that voted for joe biden that donald trump should be declared the winner instead of biden. the kamala harris birther guy who newsweek magazine had to apologize for is now the lawyer representing donald trump seeking to join the lawsuit in the united states court. president trump is telling his supporters that this is the big one. the one that is go to get him the presidency and overturn the election. this is brought by the attorney general of the state of texas who might be doing this because he reportedly is under fbi investigation for abusing his office in texas. the whole lawsuit may be ken paxton's effort to get trump's attention so he can get himself a pardon because he believes he is under fbi investigation. the lawsuit is patently insane. this is texas suing pennsylvania, georgia, wisconsin and michigan over how the other states conducted their elections. why does texas have anything to s

texas talk about this for a very long time though it's sort of in the texas soul to see itself as going into you know the lone star state it's a it's a state slogan to threaten to leave and god bless them and they did good luck to them and god bless them as well but i'm not sure that we see that happening it does seem to be a sort of emotional response at this point however it does express how alienated feeling right now how washington is too big how a couple major cities way too much political control in the supreme court refused to your most people believe because different because the media declared the winner of this election not the electoral process but the media and the people of the media the corporate interests the control media announced the president and the supreme court many people believe simply said that they don't want to step in on this. u.s. food and drug agency has approved the prize a covert vaccine for emergency use this comes amid reports the white house chief of staff pressured the watch tokes commissioner into giving the green light to the job on the threat of lo

we'll speak to a california assemblyman who also left the state of texas, left for the state of texas next. you can check your glucose with a painless, one-second scan. and now with optional alarms, you can choose to be notified if you go too high or too low. and for those who qualify, the freestyle libre 2 system is now covered by medicare. ask your doctor for a prescription. you can do it without fingersticks. learn more at freestyle libre 2 dot u.s. ♪ who invented we're car vending machines and buying a car 100% online. now we've created a brand-new way for you to sell your car. whether it's a year old or a few years old. we wanna buy your car. so go to carvana and enter your license plate answer a few questions. and our techno wizardry calculates your car's value and gives you a real offer in seconds. when you're ready, we'll come to you, pay you on the spot and pick up your car, that's it. so ditch the old way of selling your car, and say hello to the new way at carvana. introducing the new sleep number 360 smart bed. now temperature balancing, so you can sleep better together.

texas talk about this program one time though it's sort of in the texas soul to see itself as going it alone star state it's a it's a state slogan to threaten to leave and god bless them and if they did good luck to them and god bless them as well but i'm not sure that we see that happening it does seem to be a sort of emotional response at this point however it does express how alienated people are feeling right now how washington is too big how a couple major cities way too much political control and the supreme court refused to your most people believe because they're frightened because the media declared the winner of this election not the electoral process but the media and the people to all the media look were it interesting control media announced the president and the supreme court many people believe simply said that they don't want to be donors . the u.s. the u.k. kellen they have all already approved covert vaccines but the european union is exercising caution with the head of its medicines agency saying safety must come 1st though the block is seeking ways to encourage peop

that's the senior senator from the state of texas. now, the president has asked, if it ever does get to arguments before the supreme court, which it almost definitely won't. every legal expert will tell you, the court is not going to take this up, but if it does, the president has asked the junior senator from texas, ted cruz, to argue the case for him before the court and senator cruz has agreed. so we now provide for you ted cruz for the defense. listen. >> i'll tell you what i really think of donald trump. this man is a pathological liar. he doesn't know the difference between truth and lies. he lies practically every word that comes out of his mouth. the man cannot tell the truth, but he combines it with being a narcissist. a narcissist at a level i don't think this country has ever seen. >> are you sure he's for the defense? >> i don't know. what are the signs there? that was in 2016. but it's representative, john, i don't think the moral gymnastics that ted cruz has done over the last four years has spruced anyone anymore. cruz

well the us supreme court has rejected an attempt by president donald trump and the state of texas to overturn results in the presidential election the challenge to president elect joe biden's victories in michigan georgia pennsylvania and wisconsin justices ruled that takes this didn't have the right to challenge how other states run their elections to defeat a huge setback for trump in his bid to seize electoral victory from biden. from all that's go to orlando and speak to professor michael t. morley and election and constitutional law expert from florida state university professor welcome it seemed to be widely expected that this challenge by texas would fail which turned out to be correct why did the supreme court dismiss it. the supreme court held that texas lacked standing to challenge the results of the other states elections the presidential election in the united states we often think of it as a single nationwide unitary event when in reality it's conducted as a series of $51.00 separate elections within each of the 50 states as well as the district of columbia and so the su