doggett, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. doggett will vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by mr. moulton, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. moulton will vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by mr. lieu, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lieu will vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by mr. lowenthal, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lowenthal will vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by ms. barragan, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. barragan will vote yes on ordering the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina rise? mr. butterfield: as the member designated by mr. price of north carolina, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. price will vote yes, he will vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member designated b

rush, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote no on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from connecticut seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. wilson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. wilson will vote no on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from arizona seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote no on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. brown of maryland, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. brown will vote nay on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. moulton, pursuant to house resoluti

housing. and that includes to the granada hotel which is one of the city's newest tsh sites which was acquired by the state through our process, rigorous and time-consuming process but very gratefully by the state home key grant funds. those 144 placements are to a variety of permanent accidents. the vast majority are to permanent housing, some to the flexible subsidy pool which is also permanent housing and othersto problem-solving, staying with family and friends. in terms of the six rehousing opportunities hsa is continuing to identify and bring on new resources online . thesewill include project based on supportive housing so that's a place-based , a building. flexiblehousing subsidy pool, from the housing but scattered around in different departments and rapid rehousing and divergent plus which is short-term assistance . there are currently 328units available housing for adult family today. as well as 600, 679 very precise but it does change daily .units of temporary off-line combined wit

rush, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on ordering the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. deutch of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. deutch will vote yes on ordering the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. bonnie watson coleman, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. watson coleman will vote yes on ordering the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> mr. chairman, as the member designated by mr. gates of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. gates will vote no on the previous question to h.res. 147. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from arizona seek reco

that's the duck house. the dark house. this is the wash house. this one has a neat feature. a drain in the wall. that is where they would dump the water out. this is the sleeve house. we are at green hill plantation which is that campbell county, virginia. i'm here with the company -- , they're here with me for the independent project. when i was in school from a masters thesis i started to do research with the historic american buildings survey collection which is a program that started in 1936 to get architects back to work, so 1000 architects were hired to get significant historic architecture around the united states. -- not necessarily intentionally but they did have sleeve houses and a lot of times it was just you got one photograph. or you would see that eight sleep house in the back of a picture in a main house. from my masters thesis i identified all of the sites that had a sleep house in them. so the historic -- have a documented slave house. and my fieldwork of going back and doing my own documentation of the buildings, i was a intern, in the summer, -- i just did

that's a duck house. duck a duck house. this is the wash house. this is pretty high in your list. yeah. this one has a neat feature on the backside of it has a drain in the wall. where they would just dump. yeah. yep. dump the water out so this the slave house? that has fun. my name is joe b hill, and we're at green hill plantation, which is in campbell county, virginia. and i'm here with the company trimble and they are here with me for my independent project was called saving slave houses, which is doing documentation of all the known slave houses in the united states. when i was in school for my master's thesis, i surgery research with the historic american building survey collection, which is a wpa program that started in 1936 to get architects back to work and so a thousand architects were hired to go out and document historic significant historic structures all across the united states. and part of that documentation was slave houses not necessarily intentionally, but they did document slave houses and sometimes a lot of times it was just you got like one photograph or you w

democrats control the house, senate and white house. if they wanned to deliver results for the american people they could do it. but their agenda is clear they don't want to govern, they want to rule and clamp down on any dissent. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expire. the gentlewoman reserves. the gentleman is recognized. mr. deutch: i'm pleased to yield two minutes to the gentleman from missouri, representative bush. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from missouri is recognized for two minutes. ms. bush: thank you, mr. speaker. st. louis and i rise in defense of our nation's schoolchildren. i cannot sit idly by and allow white supremacy to have decision making power over our children's future. to our republican colleagues, let history remember what you did in this moment a prerequisite for these committees must mean you love and represent all people, meaning all people. we owe it to our children, to their parents to have a health, education and labor committee committed to fighting for our country where all c

they disrespected their house, our house. and if you can't stand up for that, why are you even there? what will you stand up for? that's what america's asking tonight. this is not partisan. this is not about, oh, i've got to stand with the republicans or i've got to protect -- no, this is about our country and our government and the leaders that we charge to protect, serve, defend the constitution. they defecated outside the chamber doors. that doesn't matter to you? it's amazing. >> and they also took down american flags. alex wagner, i'm so glad michael brought it to what they were actually doing in there because there's so much lack of understanding about how this capitol campus works. all the buildings are interconnected through underground passages. it functions as one big organism. and so there's a lot of criticism of some members who were not actually in the capitol building itself. how could they possibly feel threatened? i know people who were in the heart senate office building as far away as you can get from the ca

house. -- to the floor of the house. let's be honest about what this is -- the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. mr. cole: i yield the gentleman an additional 30 seconds. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman has an-dational po seconds. mr. scott: you have a 10-vote margin in this body. this body has 20 standing committees. you created a proxy voting system to allow your members stay at home while republican members show up for work. you have another resolution which you haven't discussed yet to remove over 100 republican members of congress, including six from my home state of georgia. do you really think that we believe you are going to stop with the gentlelady from the 14th, miss marjorie taylor greene? we know better. we know better. the truth of the matter is you've got a math problem in passing your agenda. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman from oklahoma reserves. members are reminded to direct in your remarks to the chair. the gentleman from massachusett

housing. i hope you will avoid returning to the costly obama-era rule that forced cities to hire consultants and complete lengthy plans that could stretch as long as 800 pages. in my view, now was not the time to impose unfunded mandates on these communities, which will drain resources that could be used to support affordable housing and other priorities. i also believe it is local communities that should be in the drivers seat, making decisions for their communities, rather than washington. i want to learn how you will address hud's disparate impact regulations. it often seemed that defendants were guilty before proven innocent. i hope that hud, any new rule that comes from allows claims of discrimination to proceed when they are legitimate, and freeze housing providers to focus on their mission. it is also important any new rule be consistent with the supreme court decision in inclusive communities. let me make clear how i think about an important issue we are going to be wrestling with in c

as to the house deciding. it so they create a special electoral commission composed of five senators, five representatives. and lots of supreme court justices. in the results, that come back, there were three southern states. that had disputed, returns so what's shows up is two different groups, one for tilden. one for hayes. the commission comes back, and finds favor of, hayes awarding him those votes. but, as part of the political negotiation, that struck to make him president. southern states managed to -- democrats managed to push republicans to and reconstruction, formally. that happens in 1877, once that happens. which you see, over, really a decade, decade and a half is a process where, african americans are, gradually excluded from a political process, in the south. it's a combination of state laws, that go on the books. and local laws that go on the books. such as poll taxes. but our by the 1890s. both through law, and threw custom in the south, african americans largely are no longer part of the poli

this is a vote of the entire house. a simple majority will be enough to remove her from both the education and labor committee as well as the budget committee. and this vote comes after a lengthy amount of debate from both republicans and democrats, making their case as to why she should stay on those committees and why from the democrats' perspective, sheh hshould beple off those committees. the most dramatic moment happened just a few moments ago where the house majority leader steny hoyer came to the house floor with a big picture of a tweet that was once set out by marjorie taylor greene. listen to what he had to say. so, this is hoyer walking the tweet across the house floor. showing it to his colleagues on the republican side of the aisle, to emphasize the type of rhetoric that had come from marjorie taylor greene in her time leading up to becoming a member of congress. now, in that tweet is a picture of an a.r.-15 and three members of the progressive wing of the democratic party. ras rashida alexandria ocasio-cor

a question for the house manager. the clerk will report. would the president be made aware of the fbi and intelligence information of a possible attack and would the president be responsible for not preparing to protect the capitol and all elected officials of government with national guard and law enforcement as he did when he appeared in front of the st. johns episcopal church? >> it's the responsibility of the president. the president of the united states our commander-in-chief, daily briefings on what is happening in the country that he has a duty to protect. additionally, the president would have known just like the rest of us all of the reports that were out there and publicly available. tell me if he received calls saying be careful on january 6. to be careful that day. i am seeing reports. it doesn't seem safe. how much more? donald trump's art commander-in-chief and absolutely had a duty and a sworn oath to preserve, protect and defend us and to do the same for the officers under his command and he was not ju

the main house. for my masters thesis i looked at that collection and identified all of the sites that had a slave house in them. so historic american building survey has 485 sites that have a documented slave house and my fieldwork of going back and doing my own documentation of the buildings, i was a intern, we went out and saw some of them. they helped me get started and once we got started and visiting some of these i just didn't stop. i just and trunble is a company that makes the survey equipment i use and one of the pieces of equipment they make is 3d laser scanners and that is a piece of equipment that i currently don't use for my surveys. and takes a little bit more set up and technical skill and sometimes people, one reason i don't use it, but i would like to start using it. but it is also right now the highest level of documentation that is out there that you could do for buildings or objects is 3d scanning. so they are here to document some buildings with me so i can have the highest leve

larson, pursuant to house resolution 8. pursuant to house res. 8, i inform the house that mr. langevin will vote yes on house resolution 85. 4 the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from missouri seek recognition? >> as mr. billly long mr. long will vote nay on house res. 85. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: as ms. wasserman schultz: as the member designated by mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yes on h.res. 85. as the member designated by mr. hastings, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. hastings will also vote yea on h.res. 85. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. axne, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. axne will vote yes on h.res. 85. as the member designated by mrs. dingell, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. dingell will vote yes on

the side that is facing the white house. in another radio communication between metropolitan police officers, you can hear an officer declare that there is a riot at the capital at 1:49 p.m. >> we are going to give riot warnings. this is now a right yet. >> declaring it a riot. >> the next video as well as videos that follow have a model of the capital complex. the video is from the west front of the capital on the senate side, the side facing the white house. watch the red dot which moves up the lower steps of the capital indicating the approximate location of the rioters as they surged past the police. >> [indiscernible] >> >> while the mob that donald trump sent to stop the certification came closer and closer to breaching the capital just one flow -- just one floor below where we are now, vice president pence continued to decide over the session in the senate chamber above. at about 2:12 p.m., secret service quickly and suddenly evacuated vice president pence from the senate floor. here's the immediate reaction to that e

gwendolyn dubois shaw to white house history live. she is the national portrait gallery seniors dorian and director of history, research and scholarly programs. appointed in 2019, she is the first woman and the first african american, to hold that position. before joining the national portrait gallery, she was an associate professor of the history of art, at the university of pennsylvania. her work has focused on race, gender sexuality and class in the united states, latin america and the caribbean. in addition to the first lady's exhibit, that we will be talking about this evening, she has curated many exhibitions, and including 200 years of african american art at the university of pennsylvania at philadelphia art. the mauve clear art museum in new jersey as well. she received her ph.d. and art history from stanford university. if you'd like to ask doctor shaw the question, please write in the comments section of this life easy. we will get to as many questions as possible at the end of our program. gwendolyn dubois shaw we look for

largely a house story. and it has to do with the role of congress during the civil war, and in the decade after. during the civil war there were a group of radicals in congress, radicals, because they believed in the equality of african-americans, and wanted to create a society in the south after the war that was a multiracial society. these were radicals in the house, like thaddeus stephens, who was chairman of the ways and means committee and a very powerful leader. also people like henry winter davis. washburn. in the senate people like charles sumner and benjamin wade and they really drove the agenda and pushed the lincoln administration to not only prosecute more vigorously the war but also to have a reconstruction after the war that was one that was not so lenient towards southern states and was going to ensure that political rights were extended to african-americans. >> so the war ends in 1865. but how do you get from 1865 to the first african-american members of congress? because it's not, doesn't h

elections and the 2020 elections, the house gained, the house majority narrowed and there is again in republicans. so, the members of the house, they have to worry about these consequences because of the do not react to whatever the problem of the day is, somebody in the jurisdiction there, somebody is going to say, if you make me the congressman, i'll react to that and that means that the sitting member has to worry about it. because their terms are short. and it's notjust members of the house of representatives with their short terms, i saw on television in the last couple of days, the honourable gentleman from nebraska, i saw that he faced back lash back home because of the vote he made some weeks ago. a political party was complaining about the decision he made as the united states senator. it's interesting because i do not want to steal the thunder from the other lawyers but nebraska, you're going to hear, is quite a judicial thinking place and just maybe they are onto something. you will hear about what it is that the nebraska courts have to say about the issues that you are dec

trump stormed our house with the mob he incited, and is we defended our house. and he violated our constitution, and we defended the constitution, and they trashed our democracy, and we revived it. and we protected it. this was the most bipartisan presidential impeachment in the history of the united states, and we know that impeachment, for reasons that we could explore at some other time, often becomes partisan. but this was the most bipartisan presidential impeachment event in the history of the country. it was also the largest senate vote for a presidential impeachment, 57-43. and, of course, the vote to impeach was 232-197 in the house. so we have a clear and convincing members of congress that the president actually incited violent insurrection against the union and against the congress. senator mitch mcconnell just went to the floor essentially to say that we made our case on the facts, that a he believed that donald trump was practically and morally responsible for inciting the events of january 6th. he described it as we did, as a disgraceful derelictio

clerk will read it for our procedure the 'd 'd 'd house version will go 1st the house prosecutors have stated over and over again that president trump was perpetrating a big lie when he repeatedly claimed that the election was stolen from him and that he actually won the election by a landslide or the prosecutors are right when they claim that trump was telling a big lie or in your judgment did trump actually win the election. edgers have up to 2 and i have been it's. as we all know president trump did lose the election by 7000000 votes 306 electoral votes by the time of the january 6th attack the courts the justice department all 50 states across the country done agreed that the votes were counted the people had spoken and it was time for the peaceful transfer of power as our constitution and the rule of law demands. 61 courts 61 courts the president went to that's fine appropriate he lost he lost he lost the election he lost the court case as leader mccollum mcconnell recognized the day after the electors certified the votes on december 14th he said quote many millions of us had hope

in the house. the speaker pro tempore: the clerk will report the title of the bill. the clerk: h.r. 803, a bill to designate certain lands in the state of colorado as components of the national wilderness preservation system, and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to house resolution 147, an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of rules committee print 117-2 modified by the amendment printed in part a of house report 117-6 is adopted, and the bill, as amended, is considered as read. the bill, as amended, shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the committee on natural resources. the gentleman from colorado, mr. neguse, and the gentleman from arkansas, mr. westerman, each will control 30 minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from colorado. mr. neguse: thank you, madam speaker. madam speaker, i ask unanimous consent that all members may have five legislative days to revise and extend

for the sip housing and housing vulnerable people outside of that sip system. i did want to -- this is outside my lane, but i did want to share some of the things i learned from our colleagues at real estate, and i mentioned earlier. city is not sitting on perfect offer ons. there is some concern we are not moving. we have not received one offer ready to go. we are in the process of vetting interests to begin to work with property owners to put together a deal. there is no ready to go buildings that we are sitting on. i think there is also a sense that interest rates are incredibly low, there is a sense that property prices are really low. we are hearing from our colleague this is real estate that is not necessarily the case. we are balancing the ongoing financial challenges and financial with the need to acquire and expand. more from our real estate partners next month when we come together to bring in perspectives as well. i will stop there and turn it over to ann from ocd. happy to have the conversation. i would love to hear from the committee your particula

i think it is an important point that the house managers are making. the president filed an answer on paper this week. he repeated his big lie that the election results were suspect. he claimed farcically that his fighting words to his followers, that the insurrection tailgate on january 6th, were simply about election security in the future when he said if you don't fight for your democracy, you're going to lose it. told them to march on the capitol. so, if he's going to put these lies on paper, let him show up and subject himself to cross-examination under oath. i think it's smart. now, when he doesn't show, as his lawyers are saying he will not, they can point to the empty chair and say, hey, the president won't stand by his words because they are false. >> can they subpoena him? can they vote on the senate floor to issue a subpoena? >> they could issue a subpoena for the president. he'll go to court. he'll tie that up in knots. i think they've made their legal point today, the response by the president's lawyers, that the rules -- essentially, that

so a lot of this is out of the white house's hands here. that's a potentially uncomfortable place for the white house to be when they don't control all the cards. >> and seung min kim, we're going to talk in a moment about one particular cabinet pick is in trouble for the president. president biden biden knows this, just about anything important he does is going to be hard because you've got four votes in the house and no votes to give in the united states senate. you and your colleagues write about this today, the president believes he has pretty good public support, it's a plan that has $1,400 in direct payment per person. it's targeted based on your income. increases federal weekly boost to $400. that's unemployment aid. nutrition assistance, homeowner assistance, expand the trial tax credit. increase subsidies for health care. so the individual piece the white house believes is popular. but it gets hard now when the more progressive house thinks some of those proposals are absolutely essential. but then you get over to the 50/50 senate

at the house >> the house managers are recognized for up to five minutes. >> senators, this was a key quote and the key statement by the president that day, that horrific day. remember the capital had been storms, it had been attacked, people had yelled hanging mike pence, people had gone after speaker pelosi, people brought baseball bats and other weapons. many members of congress, the senate and house were fearful for their own lives. the president didn't call the national guard. his own administration didn't list him as somebody they had spoken with to activate the guard. he said remember this day forever. if he was not guilty of inciting this insurrection. if this is not what he wanted, if it wasn't what he desired, by that time the carnage had been on television for hours. he saw what was going on. everybody saw what was going on. if it wasn't what he wanted why would he have said remember this day forever? why, more rate a day like that, an attack on the us capital for god's sake? why would you do that unless you agreed it was something to praise, not condemn, something to comme

a question for the house manager. the clerk will report. would the president be made aware of the fbi and intelligence information of a possible attack and would the president be responsible for not preparing to protect the capitol and all elected officials of government with national guard and law enforcement as he did when he appeared in front of the st. johns episcopal church? >> it's the responsibility of the president. the president of the united states our commander-in-chief, daily briefings on what is happening in the country that he has a duty to protect. additionally, the president would have known just like the rest of us all of the reports that were out there and publicly available. tell me if he received calls saying be careful on january 6. to be careful that day. i am seeing reports. it doesn't seem safe. how much more? donald trump's art commander-in-chief and absolutely had a duty and a sworn oath to preserve, protect and defend us and to do the same for the officers under his command and he was not ju

house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by representative roybal-allard, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that roybal-allard will vote aye on h.r. 208. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition? ms. matsui: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on h.r. 208. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. huffman, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. huffman will vote yes on h.r. 208. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. grijalva of arizona, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yea on h.r. 208. the speaker pro

vote with the house. not democrats. vote with the house of representatives. vote with good order and peace. furthermore, senator young of indiana said, there ought to be no place in the republican party for the kind of views espoused by representative green. that's what mccarthy said when you kicked king off all of his committees. this is not something you haven't done. however, sadly, you left it to us to do your job. representative cole called her statement extraordinarily disturbing. he said that yesterday. it's an old quote. an senator thune asked his fellow republicans in the house, do they want to be the party of limited government? i think the answer to that is yes -- do they want to be the party of conspiracy theories an qanon. furthermore, senator young of indiana said, there ought to be no place in the american -- in the republican party for the kind of views espoused by representative greene. that's what your republican colleagues have said. this is not partisan. this is about principle. and you can shake your head as much as you want. this is not

if the house managers had their way they would ignore all of the constitution. does that include the 6th amendment the right to counsel they would have mr trump sitting here with our lawyers and who would be dax it could be anyone what are you or one of you. you must reject this invitation to ignore the 1st amendment it is anti american and would set dangerous precedent forever. the laws developed over the years to clearly established elected officials have the right to engage in protected speech mr trump is not just a guy on the street or a guy at a bar or a fire chief or a police officer there are a few of them and they're all analogies given by the house managers these sideways analogies are wrong mr trump was an elected official and there is an entire body of law supreme court landmark cases supporting the conclusion that mr trump actually has enhanced free speech rights because he is an elected official these cases are ignored by the house managers and the law professors and that too is total intellectual dishonesty the supreme court has long held that the

he's been in the white house. we couldn't have anything anybody more qualified to do what he's doing. he's inherited a nightmare. this president not only left us with hundreds of thousands of people dead with no plan on how to address it, but he also took a wrecking ball to democracy. so, we have two -- multiple crises we're dealing with on many levels. yes, we have to deal with the pandemic, which is ultimately about the economy. he's getting no help from the republicans. even though the vast majority of republican people in the country want what joe biden is putting forward. republican governors, republican mayors all want this covid relief package. he's doing a great job. he'll continue to do a great job. he's got his eye on the ball and he'll do what needs to be doen for the american people. and if the republicans keep resisting and keep doing what they're doing, they're going to go into the dust bin of history. they'll go the way of the wiig party. >> rob. >> yes. >> in the age of covid, you're fine, you've g

north dakota senator kramer said he would support a removal from house education committee which house democratic leaders are threatening to do this week if house republicans don't do it themselves. >> the tent can only be so big. there has to be some sort of guar guardrails. >> reporter: all that comes as house mrnt leader kevin mccarthy has yet to weigh in on greene, and the gop leader plans to meet with her one on one. greene has fired back at mcconnell, calling him the real cancer in the party, and she has begun to walk back some of her conspiratoreal views, including over the horrific school massacres. >> terrible the loss that these families go through. >> reporter: as house republicans go through one internal battle another messy fight also taking shape. this, over the future of liz cheney, the number three house republican, who joined her colleagues to impeach trump for the deadly insurrection at the capitol. house republican also meet behind closed doors wednesday in what is expected to be a tense meeting, in part focused on cheney's vote. mcconnell, another top republican suc

that actually was do the house managers a certain a memorandum that the house serves as a grand jury and prosecutor under the constitution they told you that again today if this is accurate then they highlight the complete failure to adhere to due process. one should not diminish the significance of impeachments legal aspects particularly as they relate to the formalities of the criminal justice process is a hybrid of the political and legal a political process moderated by for legal formalities this is a quote richard brought to. the 5th amendment to the united states constitution provides an relevant part that no person shall be deprived of life liberty or property without due process of law supreme court long ago recognized in matthew vs eldridge that at its core due process is about what we all want what we all have the right to demand fundamental fairness one scholar brian owsley is written that the impeachment process should and does include some of the basic safeguards for the accused that are observed in a criminal process such as fairness due process presumption of innocence

the side that is facing the white house. in another radio communication between metropolitan police officers, you can hear an officer declare that there is a riot at the capitol at 1:49 p.m. >> the next video -- as well as several videos that follow have a model of the capitol complex. the video is from the west front of the capitol on the senate side . watch the red dot that moves up the lower step of the capitol indicating the approximate location of the rioters as they surge past the police. while the mob that donald trump sent to stop the certification came closer and closer to breaching the capitol just one floor below where we are now. vice president pence continued to preside over the session in the senate chamber above. at about 2:12 p.m., secret service quitely and suddenly evacuated mike pence from the senate floor. here's the reaction. >> no audio. looks like they -- sometimes -- >> seems like that got pence out quickly. >> that's exactly what happened there. they moved pence out fast. i saw the motions, too. >> w

the certification in the house chamber. the chilling evidence shows january 6, armed and organized insurrectionist trained their sights on speaker pelosi. they sought out the speaker on the floor and in her office, publicly declaring intent to harm or kill her, ransacked her office terrorized her staff and they did it because donald trump sent them on this mission. as the insurrectionist got closer, capital police rushed the speaker from the house floor at 2:15 p.m., minutes after the capital was first breached. they recognized immediately that she was in danger. the speaker, not just rushed from the floor, the capital police deemed the threat so dangerous that they evacuated her entirely from the capital complex, brushing her to a secure off-site location. the insurrectionist intent to murder the speaker of the house is well documented and documents are now available. we know from the rioters themselves that if they had found speaker pelosi, they would have killed her. i've already discussed proud boy member, mozilla charg

her house committee assignments. the door to representative it is facing criticism for controversial statements, including suggesting violence against members of congress, and claims that school shootings are "false flag operations." the resolution passed along party lines and will be voted on by the full house on thursday. >> the rules committee will come to order. we have never had a hearing like this before. that is for two reasons -- the first reason is that we have never had a member like this before. she has encouraged violence against members of this institution. going so far as agreeing with the comment that advocated for putting a bullet in the head of the speaker of the house of representatives. that was a larger -- there was a larger pattern of endorsing violence. this is truly sick stuff. congresswoman greene has also promoted appalling things, from implying that 911 is a hoax, saying school shootings were false flag operations, and spreading anti-semitic conspiracy theories, including one about a jewish

the house managers accused mr. trump of using his words to incite the horrific events at the capitol on january 6th. yesterday, they gave you a new and novel standard of incitement with an element of forseeability. they cite zero case law. they made it up. this task of applying a complete ly made up legal standard of incitement to an impeachment proceeding is truly an unprecedented task for the senate. that's something the senate must seriously consider when deciding the issue. do you want do create a precedent where the senate will be tasked with sitting in judgment as to the meaning and implied intent of a president's words. or words of any elected official. will that allow and maybe encourage a majority party to weaponize the awesome power of impeachment against the minority to suppress a point of view. will the senate have to deal with constant articles of impeachment by a majority party accusing minority presidents or other elected officials of so called inciteful or false speeches. you can see where this coul

it is -- house? guest: it is a good thing we had a strong family discussion and came to a decision. host: in arkansas, republican. caller: this is kotten country -- cotten country. i have a suggestion, the spending at the current levels, no increases. next year, 1% lower, next year, 1% lower. act like you are a regular people. you cannot keep printing money. it is a funny situation we have. you guys borrow money and in debt me, my kids and grandkids, and give it away to foreign countries as if it is plain money, monopoly money -- play money, monopoly money. my seven-year-old grandson, we were playing monopoly, and he landed on pay $75 income tax. he said, what is that? i said, it means if you work hard, the government will take it and give it to somebody else. he said, darn, i just earned that money. he said, do i have to pay? i said, yes, or they will come get you. you guys explained too much money, and you have too many people -- guest: before you go, who won the game? caller: hated did, he was the

he raced to the white house and resigned but the house impeached him anyway and the senate decided that it had the authority to try him and it did draw him, although a majority sought to remove them to convict him, they didn't get the two-thirds, but isn't that the 1876 case of william a solid precedent? >> senator paul: no, because we never impeached the president. it would tear up the country and divide us thursday. the thing is, when you look at impeaching a president the constitution has some very specific requirements. it says on the president's impeached, the chief justice shall preside into me, this is one of the shocking things. when we showed up and we found out that yes, chuck schumer had called justice roberts and this hasn't been reported widely, but he did and justice roberts said heck no i'm not going to cross the street because you're not impeaching the president. this was a strong signal to all of us that this was going to be a partisan hearing with a democrat in the chair who was already voted for impeachment. to get any fair rulings out of a democrat that's already exp

house. they had to be rescued by police. for months, our federal courthouse in portland was placed under seat by violence in our chris who attacked while enforcement officers daily and repeatedly and try to set fire to the building. speaker pelosi did not call the violence siege of the federal building an insurrection. she called the federal agents protecting the courthouse, storm troopers . the white house complex was besieged by mobs that through bricks and bottles and secret service agents. they set fire to an historic structure and breached the security and infiltrate the treasury grounds. when my clients administrations sent in the national guard to secure the nation's capitol. the city violent democrat leaders demanded that the forces be withdrawn of targeted the washington dc mayor said the presence of the national guards was the front of the safety of the district. it must be fully investigated whether political leadership here in washington dc, took an inadequate and irresponsible f

the house starts there recitation of what president trump said. in the aftermath of when the capital was breached at roughly 6:00 p.m. what they don't tell you and what you probably don't know that at 238 president trump urge protesters at the us capital to stay peaceful , please support our capital police and law enforcement they are truly on the side of our country. sta peaceful.l. and before we run a graphic i just want to point out to president trumps speech ended at 1:11 p.m. aty 2:30 p.m. by the time word reaches the president there is a problem down here, he is not one —-dash now urging people to support capital place and law c enforcement they are on the side of the country. stay peaceful. at 3:13 p.m. the president approach the us capital one - - urge them to remain peaceful the violence. we are the party of law and order respect for the great men and women in blue. 3:13 p.m. president trumps words cannot have been cited the capital it makes it clear. let's walk through the actual timeline. 11:15 a.m. police security showe crowds formin

we in the house think of it sort of it as a house of wars attitude. why don't we just pass what we can pass without having it being determined by one person as to what can be contained in there, let's put it on there, vote it up or vote it down? in any event, we're very proud of the legislation. again, it's not the last bill we'll pass. this is the republican -- this is the rescue package. this is the rescue package. we must pass this bill to crush the virus, to save the lives and livelihoods of the american people, to put children back in school and people back to work. that is its purpose. we want to do it in a way that is fair, that addresses the disparities, as they existed. do you know in the native american community, two times as many people, percentagewide, has died than whites. the disparity in the african-american community and in the hispanic community is sinful. so as we do this bill, we want to do it in a way that's fair and equitable and continue to do testing, etc., distribution of the virus, but keeping a record of how this has been di

peter, you know this white house well. i talked to multiple sources that the mike pence chief of staff, and mark meadows to tell them what was going on. we know that typically security protocols will be triggered if there is a security incident involving the vice president, the white house would know about it, you have the line from senator tuberville. peter, the defense team still said at no point donald trump knew that mike pence was potentially in danger. how can that be? >> well, it doesn't seem possible. that seems contradicted by all the evidence we have. as you point out directly, the secret service which was rushing the vice president out of the chamber first and then later out of the office he had taken shelter into a basement secure area and was clearly in touch with the secret service colleagues back at the white house and would have made sure that everybody at the white house knew what was going on and the point that the president didn't know that was implausible. >> and the president's first public reaction wa

house. against a president elected no better than a member of the mob by inciting those people and in any ways he was worse. he named to date, the time, and he brought them here and now he must pay the price. thank you mr. president. >> mr. raskin. >> mr. president, the majority leaders recognized barnett. >> mr. president, the senate is now ready to vote on the article of impeachment per unit and after that is done, we will adorn the course of impeachment. >> the court will read the article of impeachment. [inaudible]. >> incitement of insurrection. >> the senate will be in order. it. >> the constitution provides that the house of representatives you all have the sole power of impeachment per unit and the president shall be renewed removed from office and convicted of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. further, section three of the 14th amendment to the constitution prohibits any 4tperson that is engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the united states from holdi

specifically help fund the municipal social housing, public housing that fulfills the promise of housing that is good for all that is integrated but focused on low-income tenants. this is a rare moment for housing in the united states. this is something san francisco can lead on and prove for the rest of the state, and so i hope that you will vote yes on this item, and i hope that the mayor's office of housing will also take that opportunity. thank you. >> clerk: thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> hello. this is tim from aft 2021, representing the city college of san francisco, and we are in strong support of supervisor preston's resolution. we think that the funds from prop i definitely need to go toward rent relief. it is so critical under this current housing crisis circumstances that people stay in the places where they currently are. as a teacher, i know that about 10% of the college students out there don't have homes, and it's so heartbreaking to see it, and i just don't want to see more of people who i work with and just in our society become homeless, so reall

the senate and the white house. they say, we are not playing those reindeer games again. we learned that lesson. the country definitely and desperately needs relief. we're not going to interfere with that. we're not going to step that down and give the country less of what they need in order to keep you happy. when you're not negotiating in good faith, anyway. we've seen you do this before, we're not doing it again. democrats are all on the same page. republicans today are still trying to -- they want to try this one neat trick. once again, ten republican senators led by susan collins have proposed a covid relief bill that is very, very small. quite undersized given the state the economy is in right now. for the state -- the battle against coronavirus is in right now. what they're proposing is less than a third of what president biden has proposed as what the country needs. and, again, the reason for proposing this tiny little bill is the same argument they made with the last time democrats had to rescue the country

and if you think -- secondly, think axios has bugged the white house. sourcing they have is incredible. so i recommend everybody read it to believe it, and you still won't believe it. but it strikes me, if you had medical equivalent of lawyers, you had medical physicians in the white house saying you're going to die, so trump refuses to believe that, brings in another physician, give me a second opinion, third opinion. then add these legal freaks come in, basically say, just inject a bunch of chlorine in your veins. or put light in your eyeballs or something, so he would bring in anyone to tell him whatever he wanted to hear, no matter how crazy it was, in order to overturn the election. >> michael steele, i don't remember much about high school psych class, i do remember cognitive dissonance. think of it. republican members of congress some sitting at desks that were ransacked and in chambers that were ransacked are going to tell themselves not to buy the case that democratic impeachment managers are making. what if trump faces no consequences? >> that