britain is in advance for different reasons, because britain took the decision months ago to have an emergency decision—based approach whereas the european union, the commission and the member states were more budget—conscious and had to look on the guarantees our producers were asked to provide for. we were too cautious, and britain was not cautious enough but it revealed to be the right approach. too cautious, you say. and the detail indeed backs that up because we know britain was moving to procure vaccine in the early summer of last year, while the eu didn't make the same moves until the late autumn. so there was a major time lag. the current commission president, your successor, ursula von der leyen, she has said that "we were too late and we were too optimistic "when it came to our production targets". do you think she should resign? no. somebody has to take responsibility, mrjuncker, because people are dying in europe because there is now a third wave of infection and it could be said thousands of people in europe are going to die because of these failures. these are not f

this week, we ask what is britain's role in the world? with a huge moment of change as we battle a global pandemic, and brexit has become real, there is renewed interest in what the uk's international future looks like. a new government report, called global britain, focuses on the indo—pacific — suggesting closer ties with india, japan and australia. what does this mean for the relationship with china? a question faced at the moment by president biden. meanwhile, nations all over the world continue to grapple with their vaccination programmes. what do the diplomatic skirmishes over covid tell us about where power lies today? with me are isobel hilton, founder of china dialogue, jeffrey koffman, a us—canadian journalist and formerly war correspondent for abc news, and the bbc�*s chief international correspondent, lyse doucet. welcome, and thanks so much forjoining me today. borisjohnson launched a new foreign policy direction, global britain — the integrated review this week. it was driven by professorjohn bew, a historian known

britain is in advance for different reasons, because britain took the decision months ago to have an emergency decision—based approach whereas the european union, the commission and the member states were more budget—conscious and had to look on the guarantees our producers were asked to provide for. we were too cautious, and britain was not cautious enough but it revealed to be the right approach. too cautious, you say. and the detail indeed backs that up because we know britain was moving to procure vaccine in the early summer of last year, while the eu didn't make the same moves until the late autumn. so there was a major time lag. the current commission president, your successor, ursula von der leyen, she has said that "we were too late and we were too optimistic when it came to our production targets". do you think she should resign? no. somebody has to take responsibility, mrjuncker, because people are dying in europe because there is now a third wave of infection and it could be said thousands of people in europe are going to die because of these failures. these are not fa

., britain? we looked at ten roduct britain? we looked at ten product groups. - britain? we looked at ten product groups. food, i britain? we looked at ten i product groups. food, verb fridges, alcohol, soft drink, we looked at fashion, we look at high precision tools, we looked at automobiles, homeware products and those with the main products that we looked at. also gaming products such as video games and so on. and thatis as video games and so on. and that is what the results of this survey were based on. great to talk to you and thank you very much. let's get some of the day's other news. facebook has asked a us judge to dismiss anti—trust charges against it — calling them �*nonsensical�*. the federal trade commission and 45 us states sued facebook for alleged anti—competitive behaviour in december. the lawsuit seeks the break—up of the company, which also owns instagram and whatsapp. roblox corp has seen its shares jump 43% in its new york stock exchange trading debut — valuing the company at around $42 billion. roblox is one of the world's most popular

britain looking to — science, technology, and britain looking to this _ science, technology, and britain looking to this idea _ science, technology, and britain looking to this idea of _ science, technology, and britain looking to this idea of the - looking to this idea of the indo—pacific_ looking to this idea of the indo—pacific tilt. - looking to this idea of the indo—pacific tilt. you - looking to this idea of the indo—pacific tilt. you big i looking to this idea of the - indo—pacific tilt. you big aina by asking _ indo—pacific tilt. you big aina by asking isohei— indo—pacific tilt. you big aina by asking isobel whether— indo—pacific tilt. you big aina by asking isobel whether this - indo—pacific tilt. you big aina by asking isobel whether this is - indo—pacific tilt. you big aina by asking isobel whether this is a l indo—pacific tilt. you big aina by. asking isobel whether this is a new cold war~ — asking isobel whether this is a new cold war~ i— asking isobel whether this is a new cold war. i don't _ asking isobel whether this is a new cold war. i don'

this week, we ask what is britain's role in the world? with a huge moment of change as we battle a global pandemic, and brexit has become real, there is renewed interest in what the uk's international future looks like. a new government report, called global britain, focuses on the indo—pacific — suggesting closer ties with india, japan and australia. what does this mean for the relationship with china? a question faced at the moment by president biden. meanwhile, nations all over the world continue to grapple with their vaccination programmes. what do the diplomatic skirmishes over covid tell us about where power lies today? with me are isobel hilton, founder of china dialogue, jeffrey koffman, a us—canadian journalist and formerly war correspondent for abc news, and the bbc�*s chief international correspondent, lyse doucet. welcome, and thanks so much forjoining me today. boris johnson launched a new foreign policy direction, global britain — the integrated review this week. it was driven by professorjohn bew, a historian know

is britain an outlier. yes. i mean look if you look at the countries that did best among democracies your small distant past would be a marginal politically consensual. but terribly densely populated. and islands and you know if you have 4 of those 6 characteristics you're probably you know ahead of the game islands are easier to control the pacific i mean the small nations in the pacific ocean all shot down almost immediately and almost uniformly have had none or very few cases essent past a populated bit in the book you say population density doesn't really correlate with outcome in the year versus wade in or instance that alone of course the big megacities of china where a coronavirus outcomes are so much better than in. major countries like britain you you keep on putting words in my mouth i don't think i said the density is not related i said it's not one of the primary outcomes but obviously more densely populated places tended to have it spread more quickly new york city being an obvious example i me

is britain an outlier. yes. i mean look if you look at the countries that did best among democracies your small distant past would be a marginal politically consensual. but terribly densely populated. and islands and you know if you have for all of those 6 characteristics you're probably you know ahead of the game islands are easier to control the pacific i mean the small nations in the pacific ocean all shot down almost immediately and almost uniformly have had none or very few cases essent past a populated bit in the book you say population density doesn't really correlate with outcome india versus wade in or instance that alone of course the big megacities of china where a coronavirus comes in so much better than in. nato countries like britain you you keep on putting words in my mouth i don't think i said the density is not related i said it's not one of the primary outcomes but obviously more densely populated places tended to have it spread more quickly new york city being an obvious example i mean th

britain are doinu and hitting those targets? britain are doing very — and hitting those targets? britain are doing very well— and hitting those targets? britain are doing very well according - and hitting those targets? britain are doing very well according to l are doing very well according to some research that the times got a hold of that the government had done by the government's baseline, we are already 51% done of hitting that carbon neutral targets by 2050, which is quite impressive, really. borisjohnson will use cop26, the great climate change summit, of course britain is hosting that in glasgow in november. he is hosting it as prime minister. that's to encourage others to get to the same targets, china doesn't, they have it for 2060. although this is impressive, you could argue that it has been done largely by closing down: fire power stations, increasing renewable energy, offshore wind and solar. the next 50%, 49%, that may be a little harder, because that will have to be done more through domestic consumption. so that's cars, people who drive electric cars, that mea

and the brush and he becomes good friends with bad bradford britain and britain goes on to collect over 230 pieces of borene's work. so we're now in the britain house and this is you know, this is the original part of the institution. so for the first 50 years of the institutions history, this was the main thing to see here, but the house dates back to 1892 william moncrief and his brother malcolm billed the house and then william lives here with his wife until 1910 when he sells the biggest part of the ranch to the gallatin family and then in 1923 bradford britain buys the house. and he puts it into this shape in 1928 after a remodel it has five bedrooms in it including bradford's big bedroom down in the wing when britain remodeled it in 1927. he made sure that every bedroom had its own bath. it's just a very ideal home for for a country. gentleman is really what it was. this was the repository of his art and this is where he came to relax and have a good time. it was sheridan. and in those days was the basically the heartbeat of the dude ranch industry and so there were lots of dude r

but what will this mean for britain's relationship with china? the report says the uk should pursue a positive relationship with beijing on trade and climate change but still says it presents a systemic challenge to britain. china represents the generational threat and the reason for that is that the idea that china will become more like us as it got richer or as its economy matured is clearly for the birds. the question for any new foreign policy is not what people at the foreign office think, but whether it changes people's lives. will this new focus on asia make people safer and more prosperous or will it neglect britain's interests closer to home? the report insists britain's commitment to euro atlantic security is unequivocal with nato at its heart but there is little about cooperation with europe on regional threats. like russia, which after the salisbury poison attack the report says remains the most acute threat to britain's security. the review rightly identifies russia as the number one threat that we face, both at home and abroad, but

look britain. canada france any other even russia because i'm talking about the free countries you know that they become terrorists that they claim that they support human rights and democracy i blame them more than that countries that they say doesn't support the they don't claim that they support democracy and freedom like russia or sign or because i think people are suffering in their countries also you know with democracy so i hope that you will by militia know this. i mean what i'm saying now but let me to say about that return your scale and any other countries you know that support any dictators around the world with any kind of supporting. their it is you know directly or indirectly they are participating with this dictator on his i believe missile against his way people or against any people. and in the world and india man they are supporting mohammad beside him and mohamed in killing yemenis when they sell a cell with this to them so it's very important for this country as countries that

budget day as britain's arms companies continue to benefit from the saudi war on geostrategic yemen that began 6 years ago this month the government of bars johnson was u.k. foreign secretary backed weapon sales even after atrocities against civilians is now said it wants to slash aid to one of the poorest countries in the world well joining me now from boston is someone born in the middle east and former british colony the youngest nobel peace prize winner of the time in history to our core common alcohol thank you so much for coming on the show well you know even before i get to yemen a lot of talk in the mainstream media so-called about the cia report on the killing of your friend to the washington post journalist why should we trust the cia when it says that mohamed bin selman was a mastermind of the horrific bone saw killing of your friend did you see a very porous is one of the early part of that was published by the by. turkey by your and by. his friends it's one of their most important reports talking about the death and dismembering. but it is absolutely it is a very important r

britain in terms of opinionated programming _ britain in terms of opinionated programming i— britain in terms of opinionated programming. i see _ britain in terms of opinionated programming. i see gb - britain in terms of opinionated programming. i see gb newsl britain in terms of opinionated i programming. i see gb news as britain in terms of opinionated - programming. i see gb news as this case where — programming. i see gb news as this case where you _ programming. i see gb news as this case where you would _ programming. i see gb news as this case where you would have - case where you would have opinionated _ case where you would have opinionated people - case where you would have opinionated people arguing case where you would have . opinionated people arguing at case where you would have - opinionated people arguing at length with guests — opinionated people arguing at length with guests who _ opinionated people arguing at length with guests who completely - opinionated people arguing at length with guests who completely are - opinionated people arguing at length with guest

britain with piers moraan... �* , is good morning britain with piers moraan... �*, �* ., morgan... itv's good morning britain and there was — morgan... itv's good morning britain and there was only _ morgan... itv's good morning britain and there was only topic— morgan... itv's good morning britain and there was only topic of— and there was only topic of conversation. 0n and there was only topic of conversation. on one side, piers morgan, who has been more than scathing about the duchess of sussex, and on the other, alex beresford, defending her comments on race and mental heath but things got heated. i race and mental heath but things got heated. , ., , ., ., �* race and mental heath but things got heated. , . ., �* ~' heated. i understand you don't like mechan heated. i understand you don't like meghan markle _ heated. i understand you don't like meghan markle and _ heated. i understand you don't like meghan markle and you _ heated. i understand you don't like meghan markle and you have - heated. i understand you don't like| meghan markle and you have made heated. i und

the effect of the pandemic do you believe there were deliberate lies here in britain. i don't say were deliberate lies i think most countries and look for injuring or at least not having accuracy just expressed in the beginning why would they fudge the statistics it's as you allege here in britain well obviously the british government denies it's fudging any statistics every country every nation i think fund you statistics at one point or another and you do say the islands. apart from have spread and they have tended to do better i mean imagine new zealand an island nation is it is britain an outlier. yes. i mean look if you look at the countries that did best among democracies your small distant past would be a marginal politically consensual. but terribly densely populated. and islands and you know if you have for all of those 6 characteristics you're probably you know ahead of the game islands are easier to control the pacific i mean the small nations in the pacific ocean all shot down almost immediately and almost uniformly have had none or very few cases essent pa

that entered the war was not britain that ended the war. his country was was impoverished needed funding american's power on the world stage, you know early in the speech churchill says, this is a solemn moment for democracy the united states of america is at the pinnacle of world power. and with that power comes responsibility tr. realizes that his own country is not in that position. so in many ways he's shopping for the special relationship and that alliance and to to benefit britain certainly behind the scenes in his visit. to the united states before the iron curtain speech churchill is trying to broker a deal to secure funding from the united states as opposition leader for his government, you know, he's looking to to to secure funds to help with the indebtedness of his own country from the united states. so the special relationship was one that we talk about today quite a bit, but it was also a relationship in some ways of necessity for great britain at the time. i'm into a little plug here. we have a new book that the museum just pu

_ to look beyond the eu, and therefore give britain more of a role in parts of the _ give britain more of a role in parts of the world — give britain more of a role in parts of the world that it perhaps needs to have _ of the world that it perhaps needs to have that military threat in order— to have that military threat in order to — to have that military threat in order to make its presence known and felt. certainly there are concerns about _ felt. certainly there are concerns about china and russia, and making sure the _ about china and russia, and making sure the uk— about china and russia, and making sure the uk can defend itself. but an awful— sure the uk can defend itself. but an awful lot of money is involved in this, _ an awful lot of money is involved in this, i_ an awful lot of money is involved in this, ithink— an awful lot of money is involved in this, i think £10 billion has been recommended for the nuclear warheads. and i think of few eyebrows will be raised by this, wondering if this is the best use of those _ wondering if this is the best use of those funds

when britain had vaccinated 20 million i britain had vaccinated 20 million people. — britain had vaccinated 20 million pe0pte. germans— britain had vaccinated 20 million people, germans began- britain had vaccinated 20 million people, germans began to - britain had vaccinated 20 million people, germans began to push| britain had vaccinated 20 million i people, germans began to push for astraleneca — people, germans began to push for astrazeneca. it _ people, germans began to push for astrazeneca. it is _ people, germans began to push for astrazeneca. it is quite _ people, germans began to push for astrazeneca. it is quite true, - people, germans began to push for astrazeneca. it is quite true, to- astrazeneca. it is quite true, to use baris— astrazeneca. it is quite true, to use borisjohnson's_ astrazeneca. it is quite true, to use borisjohnson's language, i astrazeneca. it is quite true, to. use borisjohnson's language, you can say— use borisjohnson's language, you can say that — use borisjohnson's language, you can say that germany _ use borisjohnson's language, you can say that

in 1807, britain resolved to abolish the transatlantic slave trade. the thing that i think also needs to be said is that this was not simple altruism on the part of great britain. in other words, it wasn't simply the humanitarianism of the abolition movement. it's the britain did not warn other imperial rivals to have the benefit of slave labor when in fact they didn't in $815.00 armed with its naval supreme, britain imposed the cessation of the slave trade on its commercial rivals. as abolition took effect among the leading european slave powers, the decision gradually shut down the northern atlantica slave trade routes. but it also set off fresh deportations too and within countries where slave ownership was still prevalent. by grouping together, the captives born on its soil, the united states was also about to enter a new era of slavery. a fairly small percentage of the people brought over to the americas in the slave trade. actually came to north america, probably 345 percent. and yet, by the time you get to 190825838 very large percentage of the

but what will this mean for britain's relationship with china? the report says the uk should pursue a positive relationship with beijing on trade and climate change but still says it presents a systemic challenge to britain. china represents the generational threat and the reason for that is that the idea that china will become more like us as it got richer or as its economy matured is clearly for the birds. the question for any new foreign policy is not what people at the foreign office think, but whether it changes people's lives. will this new focus on asia make people safer and more prosperous or will it neglect britain's interests closer to home? the report insists britain's commitment to euro atlantic security is unequivocal with nato at its heart but there is little about cooperation with europe on regional threats. like russia, which after the salisbury poison attack the report says remains the most acute threat to britain's security. the review rightly identifies russia as the number one threat that we face, both at home and abroad, but

britain took a bit of a punch, and looked _ britain took a bit of a punch, and looked at — britain took a bit of a punch, and looked at the evidence and said that it looks _ looked at the evidence and said that it looks likely to work with the 60 fives _ it looks likely to work with the 60 fives and — it looks likely to work with the 60 fives and it — it looks likely to work with the 60 fives and it seemed to be an outstanding decision by our senior scientists— outstanding decision by our senior scientists and ministers to agree with them. there were people who definitely— with them. there were people who definitely however were playing politics — definitely however were playing politics with and i am afraid macron's_ politics with and i am afraid macron's comments suggesting the vaccine _ macron's comments suggesting the vaccine did not work at all where i think— vaccine did not work at all where i think incredibly ill advised. frankly— think incredibly ill advised. franklyjust foolish at such an important public health time to be saving _ important public health time to

look britain. canada france any other even russia because i'm talking about the free countries you know that they are the countries that they claim that they support human rights and democracy i blame them more than that countries that they say doesn't support the they don't claim that they support democracy and freedom like russia or signer because i think people are suffering in their countries also you know with democracy so i hope that you will by militia know this. i mean what i'm saying now but let me to say about that return your scale and any other countries you know that support any dictators around the world with any kind of supporting. the it is you know directly or indirectly they are participating with this dictator in his i believe mr against his way people or against any people of. iran in the world and india that they are supporting mohammad beside him and mohammad in killing yemenis when they sell a cell with this to them so it's very important for this country as countries that cl

britain after the war was not the britain the end of the war -- ended the war. his country was impoverished, they needed money. early in the speech churchill says, this is a solemn moment for democracy. the united states of america is at the pinnacle of world power and with that power comes responsibility. churchill realizes his own country is not in that position. in many ways he is shopping for the special relationship to benefit britain. certainly behind-the-scenes in his visit to the united states before the "iron curtain" speech he was trying to broker a deal to secure funding from the united states for his government. he is looking to secure funds to help with the indentedness of his own country. the special relationship was when we talk about today quite a bit, but it was also a relationship, in some ways, of necessity for great britain at the time. we have a new book at the museum that was just published on the subject called "the inspiring history of the special relationship." it is by one of our fellows. it is fascinating. new look at the speech and th

look britain. canada france any other even russia because i'm talking about the free countries you know that they are the countries that they claim that they support human rights and democracy i blame them more than that countries that they say doesn't support the they don't claim that they support democracy and freedom like russia or signer because i think people are suffering in their countries also you know with democracy so i hope that you will by militia know this. i mean what i'm saying now but let me to say about that return your scale and any other countries you know that support any dictators around the world with any kind of supporting. the it is you know directly or indirectly they are participating with this dictator in his i believe in missile against his way people or against any people. and in the world and india man they are supporting mohammad beside him and mohammad in killing the yemenis when they sell a cell with this to them so it's very important for this country as countries

morgan was bringing in record ratings for good morning britain, of course, but he quit on tuesday after refusing to apologise for his on—air criticism of the royal couple. so, whilst the oprah interview represents a historic moment for buckingham palace, is it also a massive deal for british media? perhaps so. does piers morgan's departure show that his brand of highly opinionated journalism is incompatible with an ofcom—regulated tv channel? and will he resurface on one of the new news channels that's coming to the uk which has promised to capitalise on that exact style of noisy journalism? let me introduce you to our guests. jane martinson is a professor ofjournalism at city university, and was the guardian's media editor. jane, just a moment ago when we were on the zoom call, you were on a phone call which terrified me slightly. who were you talking to and did it have to do with journalism? it was, i was actually talking to the guardian opinion desk, which i had written a piece about the aforementioned piers morgan and his departure from gmb. just give us a quick take. the top li

britain — europe, there are problems there, but britain is going in the right direction _ but britain is going in the right direction. ~ , ., ., direction. must have the adult imputation _ direction. must have the adult population vaccinated - direction. must have the adult population vaccinated in - direction. must have the adult population vaccinated in the i direction. must have the adult i population vaccinated in the uk, let's look at the daily telegraph, because they have the moment. the prime minister didn't take his shirt off, unlike the greek leader who did, so there you go. but, susie, you touched upon this, the kind of messaging when it came to astrazeneca and the telegraph picking up on the uk vaccines are describing that it was completely irresponsible when it came to watch angela merkel and emmanuel macron in particular was saying about the oxford astrazeneca vaccine. it got into the telegraph _ oxford astrazeneca vaccine. it got into the telegraph magazine - oxford astrazeneca vaccine. it grrt into the telegraph magazine tomorrow with the biochemist who is in charge of

the great britain that entered the war was not the great britain that left the war. power on the world stage. early in the speech, the united states of america is at the pinnacle of world power and with that power comes responsibility. churchill realizes that his own country is not in that position. in many ways he is shopping for a special relationship and alliance to benefit britain, certainly behind the scenes in his visit to the united states before the iron curtain speech, churchill is trying to broker a deal to secure funding from the united states as opposition leader for his government. he is looking to secure funds to help with the indebtedness of his own country. the relationship is one we talk about today quite a bit, but it was also a relationship in some ways essential for great britain at the time. we have a new book just published on the subject called "the aspiring history of the special relationship." it is by one of our churchill fellows. it is fascinating any new look at the speech and the history of that relationship. host: let's talk to ned who i

but what will this mean for britain and china? the report angered some tory mps for seeking a positive relationship with beijing on trade and climate change, while acknowledging the country still presents a systemic challenge to the uk. china represents the generational threat and the reason for that is that the idea that china would become more like us as it got richer or as its economy matured is clearly for the birds. the question for any new foreign policy is not what people here at the foreign office think, but whether it changes people's lives. will this new focus on asia make people safer and more prosperous or will it neglect britain's interests closer to home? the report insists britain's commitment to euro—atlantic security is unequivocal with nato at its heart, but there is little about cooperation with europe on regional threats. like russia, which after the salisbury poison attack the report says remains the most acute threat to britain's security. the review rightly identifies russia as the number one threat that w

~ . , ., britain. we have been having discussions. _ britain. we have been having discussions. i— britain. we have been having discussions. ijust _ britain. we have been having discussions. i just spoke - britain. we have been having discussions. i just spoke with britain. we have been having - discussions. i just spoke with the secretary for support and he has agreed to try and help us. all of these we are in the process of acquiring theirjamaican passport. west ham checker michael antonio is set to be considering the country as an option for some blackburn fonseca murray bill has already committed himself. how many rehearsals have you already done? i himself. how many rehearsals have you already done?— himself. how many rehearsals have you already done? i have done quite a bit to be fair. _ you already done? i have done quite a bit to be fair. get _ you already done? i have done quite a bit to be fair. get to _ you already done? i have done quite a bit to be fair. get to know - you already done?

britain doesn't have that, remember. their slavery was done overseas out of sight. there absolutely needs to be an education especially amongst journalists and the media. >> what do you think the prince's response to the question -- you didn't like the question, but what did you think of the response? >> i thought it was more telling

will it neglect britain's interests closer to home? britain's commitment to your atlantic security is unequivocal, with nato at its heart. but there are regional threats. after salisbury poison attack, it is an acute threat to britain'security. >> russia is the number one threat we face both at hand abroad, but there was no strategy to work with our european partners to try to do with that challenge. there was no strategy to repair our defenses at home. >> to help tackle new threats, there will be a white house staff situation room near downing street and a new counterterrorism operations center. the report says there is evolving surity environment. an old-school weapon is not supposed to be a new strategy. james lerner, bbc news. ross: in a few minutes time, we will hear former first letting michelle obama sharing her thoughts on harry and meghan's interview. the police officer accused of the kidnap and murder of a woman walking home in london has appeared at the old bailey via video link. the case of sarah everard's death two weeks a

borisjohnson unveils a new vision for britain's place in the world — less europe, more asia global britain is not a reflection of court obligations and vainglorious gesture, the necessity for the prosperity and success of the british people of the decade ahead. the duke of edinburgh returns to windsor — a month after going into hospital for an infection and having a heart procedure meanwhile a us tv presenter friend of the duke and duchess of sussex — reveals details of talks between harry and his brother prince william and their father, prince charles... talked to his brother and he has talked to his father to come at the world i was given was of those conversations were not productive. and i am glad to be of the lease started a conversation. the european medicines agency says the benefits of the astra zeneca vaccine outweigh the risks —— as here the health secretary seeks to offer reassurance: the astrazeneca jab is safe, we know that over 10 million people have had it in this country. and that is what the british regulator office and the world health organization and even the eu

morgan was bringing in record ratings for good morning britain, of course, but he quit on tuesday after refusing to apologise for his on—air criticism of the royal couple. so, whilst the oprah interview represents a historic moment for buckingham palace, is it also a massive deal for british media? perhaps so. does piers morgan's departure show that his brand of highly opinionated journalism is incompatible with an ofcom—regulated tv channel? and will he resurface on one of the new news channels that's coming to the uk which has promised to capitalise on that exact style of noisy journalism? let me introduce you to our guests. jane martinson is a professor ofjournalism at city university, and was the guardian's media editor. jane, just a moment ago when we were on the zoom call, you were on a phone call which terrified me slightly. who were you talking to and did it have to do with journalism? it was, i was actually talking to the guardian opinion desk, which i had written a piece about the aforementioned piers morgan and his departure from gmb. just give us a quick take, the top li

well, it very much defines brand britain, i to brand britain? well, it very| much defines brand britain, to be honest. this family that has builtan empire be honest. this family that has built an empire and ruled and empire around the globe, it's been around for over 1000 years, so it's a core part of what defines the united kingdom, and so in the eyes of americans, the pomp and circumstance around the family, its traditions, but also the values that it upholds around what this country stands for, is quite meaningful and americans are drawn to this country, in large part, because the royal family is something that we in the us don't have, and so it's attractive, it's interesting, it's intriguing, and of course because of our own history in the us, it is something that we look at with both intrigue and great interest, and how intensely the allegations and the stories that we heard and that with 0prah that we heard and that with oprah winfrey, how impactful that will be on demand for interest in coming here is yet to be seen but it certainly will

in the women's race two sisters won two medals for great britain. cindy sember and tiffany porter finished second and third respecitively behind the gold winning nadine visser from the netherlands. sember took silver — she's porter's younger sister. and in the last half hour, britain have another silver medal — in the women's 4 by a00m relay. the british quartet of zoe clark, jodie williams, ama pipi and jessie knight came in second just behind the netherlands. the men's quartet took bronze in the same event. two golds across the week for british athletes mean they finish third in the overall medal table. in cricket, england's women have continued their run of fine form, completing a clean sweep over new zealand in the t20 series, to add to their one—day triumph last month. after setting the home side a victory target of 129, they bowled them out forjust 96. mady villiers took a career best 3—10, and nat sciver wrapped up a 32—run win in wellington. it's brilliant to be able to come out here and play as a group again. we haven't played 0di

pageantry, palaces, at the centre of what they do for britain. and i think this kind of conflict cannot be good for them. 0k. thank you so much forjoining us today. much more next week. shaun ley is here next week. from me, for now, goodbye. hello there. high pressure has brought largely fine and settled conditions to the uk during the weekend. it looks like this settled weather is going to last through monday and tuesday, but then it's all change. midweek, it's going to turn very windy with the possibility of severe gales developing through wednesday night into thursday. we'll also have some heavy rain as well, so some big changes to the weather as we move deeper on into this week. in the short term, though, we still have higher pressure to south of the uk, some weather fronts to the north of the uk, so monday is a north—south divide. it's a cold, frosty start across the midlands, wales, southern england, with some sunshine. clouds may tend to increase at times and further north, we will see some showery bursts of rain, some of thatjust pushin

will continue to criticize it a little bit not to want to watch britain unveil this review if you're sitting in beijing must be a frankly bewildering experience there is no question the trial it would pose a great challenge for a loop in society such as ours but we've also worked with china where that is consistent with our values and interests boris johnson essentially saying that his response to issues like democracy in hong kong or the plight of the week is it will be empty words because that suits britain why essentially because we have a strong trade relationship with china was a valued 1000000000 pounds trying is the 2nd largest economy in the world he's talking as if no one in china can actually hear him say he's pretty flexible on the old values thing there's a bit of money to be had some of the more confusing detail when on the one hand this review decides that britain needs. the tea to blow up the world another couple dozen times so commits to a 40 percent increase in its nuclear stockpile while at the same time we're committed to a nuclear arms reduction indeed we believe

will continue to criticize it a little bit not to want to watch britain unveil this review if you're sitting in beijing must be a frankly bewildering experience there is no question the trial that would pose a great challenge for a loop in society such as ours but we've also worked with china where that is consistent with our values and interests boris johnson essentially saying that his response to issues like democracy in hong kong or the plight of the week is it will be empty words because that suits britain why essentially because we have a strong. drive that was divided 1000000000 pounds trying to is the 2nd largest economy in the world he's talking as if no one in china can actually hear him say he's pretty flexible on the old values thing there's a bit of money to be had some of the more confusing detail when on the one hand this review decides that britain needs. the t. to blow up the world another couple dozen times commits to a 40 percent increase in its nuclear stockpile while at the same time we're committed to a nuclear arms reduction indeed we believe that china should

will continue to criticize it a little bit not to want to watch britain unveil this review if you're sitting in beijing must be a frankly bewildering experience there is no question the trial it would pose a great challenge for a loop in society such as ours but we will also work with china where that is consistent with our values and interests boris johnson essentially saying that his response to issues like democracy in hong kong or the plight of the week is it will be empty words because that britain why essentially because we have a strong relationship with china the worth of 1000000000 pounds try. it is the 2nd largest economy in the world he's talking is known in china can actually hear him say he's pretty flexible in the old values thing there's a bit of money to be had some of the more confusing detail when on the one hand this review is that britain needs the ability to blow up the world another couple dozen times so it commits to a 40 percent increase in its nuclear stockpile while at the same time could be due to a nuclear arms reduction indeed we believe that china oh sho

will continue to criticize it a little bit not to want to watch britain unveil this review if you're sitting in beijing must be a frankly bewildering experience there is no question the trial it would pose a great challenge for a loop in society such as ours. but we've also worked with china where that is consistent with our values and interests boris johnson essentially saying that his response to issues like democracy in hong kong or the plight of the week is it will be empty words because that britain why essentially because we have a strong trade relationship with china was divided 1000000000 pounds trying is the 2nd largest economy in the world he's talking as if no one in china can actually hear him say he's pretty flexible on the old values thing sounds a bit of money to be had some of the more confusing detail when on the one hand this review decides that britain needs the ability to blow up the world another couple dozen times so it commits to a 40 percent increase in its nuclear stockpile while at the same time to be deterred a nuclear arms reduction indeed we believe that

but what will this mean for britain's relationship with china? the report says the uk should pursue a positive relationship with beijing on trade and climate change but still says it presents a systemic challenge to britain. china represents the generational threat and the reason for that is that the idea that china will become more like us as it got richer or as its economy matured is clearly for the birds. the question for any new foreign policy is not what people at the foreign office think, but whether it changes people's lives. will this new focus on asia make people safer and more prosperous or will it neglect britain's interests closer to home? the report insists britain's commitment to euro atlantic security is unequivocal with nato at its heart but there is little about cooperation with europe on regional threats. like russia, which after the salisbury poison attack the report says remains the most acute threat to britain's security. the review rightly identifies russia as the number one threat that we face, both at home and abroad, but

internal market on providers with unfettering seases to goods from great britain? >> the position within u.k. and tell market is rock solid in guaranteed. we are making sure that we underscore that with some temporary operational easings in order to protect the -- protect the market in some areas such as food supplies pending further discussions with the eu as i said i think honorable gentlemen and his colleagues we leave nothing off the table in order to ensure that we get this right. >> mr. speaker, forecast and the globe exactly what the u.k. can achieve we have a hospital -- and glendale university and with close to mid-land and northwest. with the prime minister is now is the time look at careers and in health care and it is the health that can take us forward. i thank her returning to the frontline, and actually it was -- that e met a young female scientist mr. speaker who were helping to make the vaccine that is not for our country we hope from the captivity of covid but help to liberate the entire world that was wonderful to see it happening and want to see

will continue to criticize it a little bit not to want to watch britain unveil this review if you're sitting in beijing must be a frankly bewildering experience there is no question the child with great challenge for a loop in society such as ours but we've also worked with china where that is consistent with our values and interests boris johnson essentially saying that his response to issues like democracy in hong kong or the plight of the week is it will be empty words because that britain why essentially because we have a strong relationship with china there was a value 1000000000 pounds trying as the 2nd largest economy in the world he's talking as if no one in china can actually hear him say he's pretty flexible on the old values thing sounds as a bit of money to be had some of the more confusing detail when on the one hand this review decides that britain needs. the t. to blow up the world another couple dozen times so it commits to a 40 percent increase in its nuclear stockpile while at the same time we're committed to a nuclear arms reduction indeed we believe that china oh

will continue to criticize it a little bit not to want to watch britain unveil this review if you're sitting in beijing must be a frankly bewildering experience there is no question the child with great challenge for a loop in society such as ours but we've also worked with china where that is consistent with our values and interests boris johnson essentially saying that his response to issues like democracy in hong kong or the plight of the week is it will be empty words because that suits britain why essentially because we have a strong relationship with china where the value 1000000000 pounds trying to is the 2nd largest economy in the world he's talking as if no one in china can actually hear him say he's pretty flexible on the old values thing there's a bit of money to be had some of the more confusing detail when on the one hand this review decides that britain needs. the t. to blow up the world another couple dozen times so commits to a 40 percent increase in its nuclear stockpile while at the same time we're committed to a nuclear arms reduction indeed we believe that china o