but there is some circumstantial evidence that it would have come from an accidental escape from the wuhan institute of virology. we know from state department cable back in 2018 that the u.s. was concerned about biosafety. they lacked standards for a level 4 lab dealing with highly contagious and dangerous viruses. and the state department released a declassified stat sheet in mid-january laying out some more interesting details, data research being conducted at the wuhan lab, secret military experience -- experiments. the wuhan lab apparently collaborated with the chinese military and the lab itself also apparently was in possession of and studying covid-19's closest known genetic relative as well. so circumstantial evidence, to be sure, and certainly not proven in any way. that sort of evidence does suggest it is a plausible hypothesis worth investigating further. it is kind of an interesting and disappointing thing that the who team would say it is not worth looking into further. host: why would dr. redfield say accidental release? guest: that's a great question. the intelligence commu

, but it's right in the middle of wuhan, and that's where this disease exploded on the world. how can you not or consider this a highly plausible theory? paul: dan, what do you make of the wuhan theory, and why do you think so many in the united states just don't want to hear about it? >> well, it's a good question. i think the burden now falls on the united states government which for the past two or three years has been collecting intelligence, as you suggested, about the wuhan virology institute. and the w.h.o. apparently just did not consider the evidence that the united states had, and considering the seriousness of this, paul, i think the burden is now on the united states to release to the mix some of the intelligence -- to the public some of the intelligence it has. the stakeses are simply too high to allow the chinese to get away with this propaganda. this isn't merely about economic issues, this is about the health of the entire world. so i would hope the biden administration would release that intelligence that they have collected about the wuhan virology lab here s

institute of virology and other institutes in wuhan. they were funded by the chinese military. programs not associated with bio defense. the chinese declared they bio defense programs at the biological weapons convention in geneva. they didn't declare the coronavirus as a priority area for research in the wuhan institute was declared as a civilian institute. that sounds suspicious to me. doesn't it to you? >> martha: yeah, it does. we know that they were doing gain of function research, which is a way to make a virus more deadly, a way to make a virus easier to transmit from human to human and even redfield, the former cdc doctor said he doesn't think that this is likely anything that came from an animal. it learned how to replicate way too fast. can you explain that? >> well, i have admired what dr. redfield said publicly. i think it came from an animal through convolution. they were injecting animals with pathogens and looking for a host that would be suitable. if you look at the wuhan institute own public research, they did research

wuhan was the most severe exampl that city was locked down. people shut out from the rest of the world. after that they, closed the borders, getting in out of this country has been very tough. china has been super, super vigilant. you can do that because it has infrastructures in place, administrative infrastructures, dealing with a couple of hundred of people. it has the enforcement mechanism in place. a vast police network. also most important, -- most importantly, digital infrastructure. how caps on phones. it is successful in containing covid and has been staggering. a city on the east coast of here last year, they tested 9 million people for covid in five days. a similar outbreak in the west, they teste almost 5 million people in a . they have not had to deal with much dissent because the truth is they contained it here and things got back to normal. people are very fearful of covid coming back. much everyone is playing along. ros: one year along -- one year on, local and national media are praising the return to normal life and the econo

team peter -- has been collaborating with the wuhan lab which is looking into researching viruses that can jump different species and this guy peter puts out a statement saying it's asp conspiracy theory to say that the covid virus will leak from a lab and when that already happened in china the sars virus is already leaked from a lab in china what is this guy with peter. >> 's conflictet of interest in part because these funded by the u.s. government to do work in the wuhan laboratory he's been talking about the media the whole past year one of his main points to say he works with the doctor, he admires doctor and she could not possibly do anything wrong she would've bee the one charged if she would've done something wrong at the lab the doctor herself with peter's help put out a number of statements and what is quite fascinating, she set on new year's eve she was shown the virus, what we call the covid-19 virus and she ran into her laboratory close to him midnight on new year's eve to see if all the library viruses she had contained anything like this virus, guess what she did not ha

more interesting detail, research being conducted at the home lab, secret military experiments, the wuhan lab apparently collaborating with chinese military and the lab itself was studying covid-19 known genetic, relative as well so circumstantial evidence, to be sure certainly not moving in anyway but that evidence suggests it's a plausible hypothesis worth investigating further so it is interesting disappointing the who team would say it's not worth looking into for the. >> why would he say accidental relief? >> great question. the intelligence community weighed in on this, a rare way last may and they said the intelligence community agreed this not a man-made bio weapon but they were taking seriously the possibility it was from these you are not forthcoming from animals, they were also taking seriously the possibility that there's an accidental leak. it looks like the lab was studying some dangerous viruses, known for coronavirus research. it known for having biosafety standards and u.s. intelligence is correct on this, it's also tengaging in secret experiments with the chinese militar

almost all fingers point to wuhan, china, the epicenter the initial outbreak. some say it came from a wet market in the city. others say it originated at a lab there that studies viruses. on tuesday, the w.h.o. released the long-anticipated report on the question. the study was controversial from the start especially since as the front page of the report said it was jointly conducted with the government of china. and as the u.s. and 13 other nations complained that the team lacked access to samples among other issues. peter daszak was one of the w.h.o. investigators on that report. peter, let me -- welcome and begin by asking you, you know, what is the central question that people are asking and have charged, which is why is the report confident that the virus, coronavirus did not originate in that lab in wuhan, the institute of virology? >> well, this is a scientific report. so what we did here is look at scientific evidence, data, and information about all of the possible pathways this virus could have taken from the wildlife host, which we think is a bat, in

almost all fingers point to wuhan, china. the epicenter the initial outbreak. some say it came from a wet market in the city, others say it originated at a lab there that studies viruses. on tuesday, the w.h.o. released the long anticipated report on the question. the study was controversial from the start especially since as the front page of the report said it was jointly conducted with the government of china. and as the u.s. and 13 other nations complains that the team lacked access to samples among other issues. peter daszak was one of the w.h.o. investigators on that report. peter, let me welcome and begin by asking you, you know, what is the central question that people are asking and have charged, which is why is the report confident that the virus, coronavirus did not originate in that lab in wuhan, the institute of virology? >> well, this is a scientific report. so what we did here is look at scientific evidence, data, and information about all of the possible pathways this virus could have taken from the wildlife host which we think is a bat into wuh

i probably would be crying too. >> wuhan is the city that's massive, 11 million people. it is essentially shutdown. it is locked down. they are not letting anyone out via airport, via train station. >> how much did you trust the information coming out of china initially? >> i always had skepticism about it because of what we went through with sars. you know, people forget but in sars, the chinese were saying, it's flu, it's flew and then the next thing you know that sars was all over the world, in canada and australia, all over the place. so they are not very transparent in the past. it wasn't outright lying. they just didn't give you all the information. >> how big of a difference would it have been if our own investigators had been on the ground in china? >> i think it would have been a significant difference. >> i think we would be dealing with a different beast. they sold us this is like sars and this is like flu. well, sars and flu, you can go after symptomatic case findings, because they cause symptomatic disease. unfortunately, this virus, the majority probably of

liz: they accredited their own wuhan lab as a biosafety level four, china given that standing. the wuhan lab leaked the virus, what is happening here gives nothing short of terrified what china is doing here. we have republican congressman on foreign affairs talking to the daily caller news foundation about this, he said it's really concerning that dr. fauci and i did not notify a federal review board about this money going out the door to the wuhan lab, should dr. fauci be called in to testify, democrats probably won't allow it, what is going on here. >> this is a problem of two levels, a lot of heads should roll, how we would ever give money to this laboratory for sustained research. let's look at this from another bubble, biolab four, i've been to one when i worked at the intelligence agency this is the most dangerous biological research takes place, i don't know why china has one but there's so easily used to make biological weapons the u.s. government should have nothing to do with them and no money should go to china i see funding research like this in france and germany

but actually what we are seeing also was the fact this was not limited to wuhan. this was spreading. we're very concerned about making sure our colleagues who were basin wuhan were safe and able to be from this to the extent possible from what we new at that time. we had to understand the impact this had not just in china but on a worldwide basis especially in regard to the ability for us to continue to produce our medicines that insights around the world and also make sure we're going to be able to take appropriate steps to address this challenge that was becoming more and more apparent it was going to be a world wide challenge we had to step up to meet. >> host: you for the argument for many americans of vaccines not safe i'm not going to get one, address that. >> guest: one of the things people are concerned about is the short period of time it took to develop the vaccine for the case with the pfizer mrna vaccine a seven half months from the time the first person received that as a vaccine candidate to the time and had emergency use authorization for that's an

it has virtually all the superfast trains go through wuhan. it has one of the most important domestic airports. and you know, 13 million people. it is a massive parade we do not have a city that large. and it is a city most americans have never heard of. and so i was monitoring it and getting increasingly anxious. my new year's eve, i was really freaked out. i thought this is it, this is the big one. at the very least this is sars comeback. it might be something worse. but, when i would tweet about it or send out a kind we get death threats. one person posted on twitter we should skin her live in torture her to which i said that is redundant. and the mountains of threats i received from scientists, from random who the heck are they i don't know, from alleged public health experts were huge. and yet, by the 30th of december i was aware of postings. and also other chinese scientists or mds actually in a wuhan posting. and i was absolutely dumbfounded i was not seeing this reflected a thing from w.h.o. so as we go into january of 2020, my life is

because part of my organization is based in wuhan. we were following it carefully. as the story emerged, we realized it was probably not safe for me to go there, so we canceled the trip. but actually what we were seeing also was the fact that this was not limited to wuhan. this was spreading. we were very concerned about making sure that our colleagues who are based in wuhan were safe and were able to be protected from this to the extent possible of what we knew at that time and then we had to understand the impact this had, not just in china, but on a worldwide basis, especially with regard to the ability for us to continue to produce our medicines insights around the world, and also to make sure we are going to be able to take appropriate steps to address this challenge that was becoming more and more apparent -- it was going to be a worldwide challenge we had to step up and meet. host: you have heard the argument from many americans, the vaccines are not safe -- i am not going to get one. address that? guest: one of the things peop

the man who subcontracted his research to the wuhan lab in the first place was the only u.s. or preventative on the investigative team. we have to get to the bottom of this, not to point fingers but to help prevent the next pandemic and as josh rogan made clear this week, one of the most disturbing aspects of this whole story is the media cover-up. >> doctor anthony fauci, hero of the pandemic, might also have had a role in the research that may have caused the pandemic. people can't get it to their heads but that's the reality but we don't have a media environment where we can have that discussion. steve: today, fauci was on all the sunday shows and guess how many times he was asked about this? zero. todd, margaret brennan, martha, none of them did their job and none of them dared go against the cult of fauci. this will not stand and we will keep going with our investigation we will keep pushing for a full independent investigation in this pandemic is killed over 2 million people and turned the world upside down. if there's even a remote possibility that it started with risk

the wuhan lab is thought to have leaked the covid-19 virus. what is happening here nothing short of terrifying what china is doing here. republican congressman scott perry of pennsylvania, he is on house foreign affairs, talking to "the daily caller" news foundation about this. he is saying it is really concerning that dr. faucis niaid did not notify a federal reserve board about the money going out the door to the wuhan lab? should dr. fauci be called in to testify? democrats probably won't allow it but what is going on here? >> this is a problem at two levels. first of all a lot of heads should roll. how we ever give money to this laboratory for dangerous research. look at this from another level. biolab fours, i've been to one, at fort detrick the defense intelligence agency this is where the most dangerous biological research takes place. i don't know why china has one but they are so easily used to make biological weapons. the u.s. government should have nothing to do with them. no money should go to china. i could see funding research in

and to remind you coronavirus was first reported in wuhan in december 2019. the city then went into a lockdown on the 23rd of january and that lockdown stayed in place for 76 days. all the way to the 8th of april 2020. china was initially criticised for its slow reaction to reports of a mystery illness circulating at a wet market in wuhan. but once china acknowleged there was a problem, authorities cracked down hard — effectively sealing wuhan off from the rest of the world. and who could forget these incredible images, when the authorities in china managed to build several brand new hospitals in literally a matter of days. official data appears to justify the measures. as you can see looking at this graph, the number of recorded covid cases in china spiked in february last year, then dropped off in march, and has stayed low since, with no second waves. the latest figures show that china has had just over 100,000 recorded infections, and only around 4,800 deaths in total. with the exception of small regional lockdowns, let's bring in cary. thanks for joinin

i mean,n, look, we just heard fm the former cdc director that the coronavirus likely came from the wuhan lab. and for months we've been hearing theav media tell us lisn to everything the cdc says. the cdc said wear a mask. no, the cdc says wear two masks. the cdc says don't go out. but as soon as the cdc says the virus came from the lab, maybe we won't listen to the cdc. >> right. that's an inconvenient truth. that's a great point, maria. it's not just the opinion of the intelligent community about things -- intelligence community about things that happened, but the cdc, the knower of everything when it relates to covid-19 and when its director comes out and says, look, i think the most likely origin of this was the wuhan institute of virology, we hear crickets from the media. they don't want to cover that because, again, that's not a political narrative that's helping to this -- helpful to this administration, the folks who have gotten rich off china and want to continue doing business with china in a way that ignores the simple truth which is that half a million americans, more america

the cluster of cases in wuhan. the responsibility of the party for suppressing intelligence. suppresses doctors and scientists, and information related to this, zero reference to closing off wuhan from the rest of china but opening it to rest of the world or propaganda campaign to blame the united states, americans want to know when a half million americans died last year, who is responsible for that? and china will be held responsible. and yet early returns are that there is no action taken by the biden administration to do that. mark: i feel certain that the chinese like the russians and iranians and north koreans are watching this administration, among other things, john, the biden administration made public its budget. a 16% growth in domestic spending. and a decline in defense spending. a slight increase but they know it is not enough to cover increase in salary or medical benefits for u.s. military. while the chinese are moving their trajectory north in terms of spending and aggressiveness, we're not only flat lining but we're worse than flat lining, does this not send

in january of 2020, to accurately describe the early days of the pandemic as people spread from wuhan through china and around the world, how does the epidemic spread. and and and all motion in china ceased. on that date the chinese saw in the virus a threat of sufficient magnitude to basically detonate a social nuclear weapon to stop it. that is how bad they thought, billion people in lockdown on january 5th. this got my attention and i was corresponding with a lot of epidemiology colleagues of mine and they were worried about the pandemic. our leaders, politicians are not saying anything to this effect. in february, italy, lapsed in northern italy and people were lackadaisical, what can i do to help? i thought i would write a book to describe basics about epidemiology for what we are experiencing in a sweep of history. that is what the book attempts to do. and what happened in our species a new pathogen was introduced, circulating among us forever and what is known in evolutionary biology is an ecological release, like an invasive species like the rack that we release on an island a

zero reference to closing off wuhan from the rest of china but opening it up to the rest of the world or the propaganda campaign to blame the united states. you know, americans want to know why when half a million americanings died last year, who is responsible for that and that china will be held responsible and yet the early returns are that there's no action going to be taken by the biden administration to do exactly that. >> i feel certain that the chinese like the russians, iranian and north koreans are all watching this administration and among other things. jon, the biden administration made public its -- its budget. a 16% growth in domestic spending and effectively a decline in defense spending what do you i mean by that a slight increase but they know it is not muff to cover increases in salary. and medical benefits for the united states military. so while the chinese are moving their trajectory north in terms of their spengsding and aggress aggressiveness we're not only flatlines but worse than flatlining does this not sending a pldges to chinese and adversaries out there? >

look, we heard from the former cdc director that the coronavirus likely came from the wuhan lab and for months we have been hearing the media tell us, listen to everything the cdc says, the cdc said wear a mask, no, the cdc said to wear two masks and the cdc said said don't go out but as soon as the former director of the cdc said the virus came from the lab, maybe we won't listen to the cdc. john: it's not just the opinion of the intelligence community about things that happened that we know happen, but the cdc, you know, the giver of freedoms, the oracle of wisdom, the nower of everything when it relates to covid-19 and when its director comes out and says, look, i think the most likely origin of this was the institute of virology, we hear crickets. it's not a political narrative for this administration. the folks who have gotten soft on china and the folks that have gotten rich on china and want to continue to do business. half a million americans died from covid-19 than died from all of world war i and world war ii. so, you know, again, we deserve answers to that. this administratio

you know, last year, tucker, we talked about the wuhan institute of virology and we talked about this idea and might have leaked from a lab, oh, that is a conspiracy theory, it's crazy -e chinese and w.h.o. actually went too far when they said this was more likely to have come from frozen food than the wuhan institute of virology, and even the biden administration had to do something about that. so, before we decide we need to inject every 16, 17, 18, 25-year-old who basically has zero risk from this virus, okay, if you are under 25, or even 30, 40, if you are in reasonable health, you are very low risk from this virus. before we decide we have to pause a mandate that, maybe we can ask a few questions about what the side effects are, and if you have this already, ml unity means you do not have to get any vaccine. >> tucker: what is the answer to that question? as someone who has read "the atlantic" most of my life, it was a journal of ideas that challenged you. now you see in "the atlantic" ideas called blindfolded into a dark room and executed. weight really is where ideas go to die,

you know, last year, tucker, we talked about the wuhan institute of virology and we talked about this idea and might have leaked from a lab, "oh, that is a conspiracy theory, it's crazy" -- well, guess what, the chinese and w.h.o. actually went too far when they said this was more likely to have come from frozen food than the wuhan institute of virology, and even the biden administration had to do something about that. so, before we decide we need to inject every 16, 17, 18, 25-year-old who basically has zero risk from this virus, okay, if you are under 25, or even 30, 40, if you are in reasonablem health, you are very low risk from this virus. before we decide we have too mandate or quasi-mandate that, maybe we can ask a few questions about what the side effects are, and if you have this already, maybe your natural unity means you do not have to get any vaccine. >> tucker: what is the answer to that question? as someone who has read "the atlantic" most of my life, it was a journal of ideas that challenged you. now you see in "the atlantic" ideas hauled blindfolded into a dark room an

that is the infamous wuhan lab. they were doing dangerous studies on bats that could transmit the coronavirus to human beings. u.s. diplomats even -- a number of years ago, raise alarms about what they were seeing at that laugh. -- at that lab. that we were sending taxpayer dollars two. they threw up the warning flag. they alerted folks in washington dc and said there are dangerous, unsecure conditions at the slab. and yet, they continued to receive our dollars. it is things like that that we are ferreting out with the other entities, like the white coast -- white coat waste project. we are out there coming up with these horrible, horrible spender chairs through the u.s. government but we are trying to put a stop to it. those are the things i have been working on with my staff. i could give you literally billions of examples of dollars that have gone to projects like that. for the life of me, i cannot believe we send millions of dollars to the commonest party of china to do those types of studies. that is what we ar

. >> bret: on china you are one of the first to send up a flare about the lab in wuhan being possibly the source of covid-19, josh rogan wrote a book about china, he was on the brian kilmeade radio show, take a listen. >> i don't know why the media is on interested in solving the pandemic. i can't figure that out, it boggles my mind, okay? my working theory is that they don't want to admit that they were wrong. >> bret: is that your theory and do you know more than what you talked about at the beginning? >> our friends in the blue media don't like to admit error, but even the biden administration is citing the possibility of an accidental leak from the lab as one of the two possible theories of origin, all the evidence points to that, but we may never know because the chinese communist party probably destroy the evidence, may be a defector or whistle-blower will tell us the truth, but we do know that china's refusal to cooperate in the early days of the pandemic to share information and allow an international team of scientists into wuhan made it down much worse, that's why china must

animales vivos para el consumo humano deben cerrar, así lo concluyó una investigación en el mercado de wuhan, donde se originó el coronavirus el reporte de la organización mundial de la salud (oms), revela que estos sitios son ideales para este tipo de transmisión viral. >> una pausa, al volver la familia de un joven latino californiade

because part of my organization is based in wuhan. we were following it carefully. as the story emerged, we realized it was probably not safe for me to go there, so we canceled the trip. but actually what we were seeing also was the fact that this was not limited to wuhan. this was spreading. we were very concerned about making sure that our colleagues who are based in wuhan were safe and were able to be protected from this to the extent possible of what we knew at that time and then we had to understand the impact this had, not just in china, but on a worldwide basis, especially with regard to the ability for us to continue to produce our medicines insights around the world, and also to make sure we are going to be able to take appropriate steps to address this challenge that was becoming more and more apparent -- it was going to be a worldwide challenge we had to step up and meet. host: you have heard the argument from many americans, the vaccines are not safe -- i am not going to get one. address that? guest: one of the things peop

and 34 members went to the wuhan lab, and why does wuhan have a virology lab? that's because that is where many viruses are present and so it is important to test and investigate viruses there. so they went to the lab and one issue was, is it possible that they were studying a virus and there was an accidental release in the community? that was the connective tissue. the report came back and said, we do not have evidence of that. but when you dig into the report, it's about 300 pages, one thing noted is there was no access to any of the raw data that china had available, blood samples and everything, so they were given a tour. there was a claim from the lab that no, we were not looking at anything in the lab that looks like this. we were not studying anything like that. so, the problem is -- and i think even the head of the w.h.o. said this -- the report is not conclusive. the chinese were not transparent . one concern is, in contrast, the chinese government said we are completely vindicated. it did not come from the lab. we suspect it did not even come from ch

the report also suggests the seafood and meat market in wuhan, china, was not where the outbreak began instead, the w.h.o. investigators point to the country's wildlife farms in southern china, here's nbc's janis mackey frayer. >> reporter: in the mystery of where the pandemic started, could the missing link be here, on the farms that long raised wild animals for food, fur and traditional medicines, like bamboo racks, deer, hedgehogs? it was a lucrative trade here. until february 2020, as the virus was spreading, virus abruptly shut down the entire industry farmers were given buy oweds to get rid of animals there were no more, he says of his porcupines they were sold or released into the mountains. china's crackdown shuttered some 20,000 wildlife farms nationwide in u nam, most clustered near the border with myanmar and laos an area also rich in bat species known to carry coronaviruses. >> particularly speaking we're very, very confident the virus came from bats the bat is without any doubt the highest risk factor. >> reporter: it is here that covid's closest known relative was identif

how does a group tied to the wuhan lab get taxpayer dollars? >> well, i mean, apparently anybody can get taxpayer dollars from a covid bailout. you know, the rules are incredibly loose as we know and set up almost to encourage, you know, waste and fraud. but, you know, this -- the good thing about this is it's another good excuse or reason to talk about what really happened in wuhan in 2019. what really happened in that lab at the wuhan institute of virology. and the fact that the w.h.o., you know, investigation was such a white wash that even the biden administration really couldn't tolerate it they said it was more likely that this had come from frozen food, you know, contamination of frozen food packaging somehow than that it had come out of china or chinese lab. and even the biden administration couldn't accept that i will remind everybody we are well over a year out from the initial, you know, emergent of sars cov 2 and nobody has come up with a way that this could have been gone from bat to humans. it hasn't been found in the wild in bat.

strain the south africa can strain the brazilian strain wuhan is off limits. we have to ask ourselves why. the answer is crystal clear to me. it is that china has mastered the art of using wokeness as a geopolitical tool back against the united states. and if there is any doubt about that, just look at the comments of xi jinping when european he cites black lives matter as a way of saying the u.s. is no better. top diplomat in alaska last month falsely claiming that black americans are being slaughtered and he hopes the u.s. does better on human rights. they have mastered this game and they are using americans here as pawns by now deflecting accountability for covid-19 by claiming that any allusion to china is now racist and that's laughable. brian: vivek i hear you. what about chinese virus the kung fu or whatever you want to do that insights americans to take out anger on asian americans. >> i think the rising tide of asian violence in the united states is an issue and needs to be addressed. that is separate. i personally believe that it is more racist to co

the first known cases of the coronavirus and china were linked to a food market in wuhan or wild animals were sold. the who said animals at the source of 70% of new infectious diseases in humans. you're watching al jazeera live from london. still ahead on the program, to minnesota police resigned over the shooting of 20-year-old daunte wright as the defense begins its case for the death of george floyd. a resounding victory for the election that critics say was stacked in their favor. ♪ >> say goodbye to the tropical cycle that came down from indonesia. that hit western australia south. the next thing to watch is a fairly active cold air. it's not particularly cold but it is windy, particularly in south australia. for the next few months he will see this sort of thing. whether coming up, strong winds through tasmania and victoria heading to west new zealand. it's still 20 in melbourne. it's warm and sunny through the coast of new south wales, and even tropical queens will barely see this in the next day or so. a seasonal change in east asia is one of rain. it's this system that wonders

long way to planning what needs to be done did any of the authorities in china say you shouldn't be in wuhan you should be in italy given their code without bodies were circulating in italy in september of 2019 way before december i mean there's no doubt the virus exploded in with them there's no question about that now the issue is was a virus circulating out of the parts of the world around that time or even a bit before and yes there is evidence mutually it's a bit from spain and some from france or some from the united kingdom and what did you feel when reportedly you weren't given some of the data you wanted i mean have you got this rule patient going to 174 covert patients from december 21000 the you are requesting. sort of do a number of things. to do before we go through including going back to looking through the last couple of months before december trying to identify potential traces of mist and we insisted on that and then they didn't and they presume to know we were of course only there for a short period of time so no although we would normally asked for in this sort of built f

the chinese communist party released a virus out of wuhan and covered it up. but biden didn't find the time to confront the chinese president about that. >> did you ask if the reports are true that china maybe misled the world at the beginning? >> no, i have not had that conversation with president xi. thank you. jesse: two hours, didn't come up. the democrats in the media can't place the blame on china. they have to place the blame for the virus on donald trump. the perception of the pandemic were shaped by democrat donors who had big business in chain a and project veritas' hidden cameras uncovered cnn's mind control techniques here. >> it alters the perception on anything. like ... forcing a story. in coal is the future of energy. jesse: later in the video the cnn director said the network will be pivoting to going green. for cnn's parent company at&t who just a few years ago bought a jienld amount of wind power and hopes to cash in with biden's ask green blowout for infrastructure. politicians turn their backs on the chinese slave labor camps. you remember

long way to planning what needs to be done did any of the authorities in china say you shouldn't mean wuhan you should be in italy given their deco without bodies were circulating in italy in september of 2019 way before. i mean there's no doubt the virus exploded in with them there's no question about that now the issue is was a virus circulating out of the parts of the world 'd around that time or even a bit before and yes there is evidence mutually it's a bit from spain and some from france or some from the united kingdom and what did you feel when reportedly you weren't given some of the data you wanted i mean have you got this rule patient into 174 covert patients from december 21000 the you were requesting. that's true i sort of do a number of things we chinese to do before we got there including going back looking through the last couple of months before december trying to identify potential cases not of missed and we insisted on that being done and they did a search and they presented no we're of course only there for a short period of time so know all that we would normally ask for

long way to planning what needs to be done did any of the authorities in china say you shouldn't mean wuhan you should be in italy given their code without the bodies were circulating in italy in september of 2019 way before december i mean there's no doubt the virus exploded in with them there's no question about that now the issue is was the virus circulating in other parts of the world around that time or even a bit before and yes there is evidence mutually it's a bit from spain and some from france or some from the united kingdom and what did you feel when reportedly you weren't given some of the data you wanted i mean have you got this rule patient into 174 covert patients from december 21000 the who are requesting. that's true i sort of do a number of things the chinese to do before we got there including going back looking through the last couple of months before december trying to identify potential traces not of mist and we insisted on that being done and they did a search and they presented that there were of course only there for a short period of time so no all that we would nor

long way to planning what needs to be done did any of the authorities in china say you shouldn't mean wuhan you should be in italy given their code without bodies were circulating in italy in september of 2019 way before december i mean there's no doubt the virus exploded in with them there's no question about that now the issue is was a virus circulating out of the parts of the world around that time or even a bit before and yes there is evidence mutually it's a bit from spain and some from france or some from the united kingdom and what did you feel when reportedly you weren't given some of the data you wanted i mean have you got this rule patient into 174 covert patients from december 21000 the who are requesting. that's trying to sort of do a number of things. to do before we got there including going back looking through the last couple of months before december trying to identify potential traces mart of mist and we insisted on that and then they did and they presented no we were of course only there for a short period of time so no although we would normally i asked for in the sort o

long way to planning what needs to be done did any of the authorities in china say you shouldn't mean wuhan you should be in italy given their code without the bodies were circulating in italy in september of 2019 way before december i mean there's no doubt the virus exploded in with them there's no question about that now the issue is was a virus circulating out of the parts of the world around that time or even a bit before and yes there is evidence mutually there's a bit from spain and some from france or some from the united kingdom and what did you feel when reportedly you weren't given some of the data you wanted i mean have you got this rule patient into 174 covert patients from december 21000 the you were requesting. that's true i sort of do a number of things the chinese to do before we got there including going back looking through the last couple of months before december trying to identify potential traces not of mist and we insisted on that being done and they did a search and they presented that there were of course only there for a short period of time so no all that we would

long way to planning what needs to be done did any of the authorities in china say you shouldn't mean wuhan you should be in italy given their code without the bodies were circulating in italy in september of 2019 way before december i mean there's no doubt the virus exploded in with them there's no question about that now the issue is was a virus circulating out of the parts of the world 'd around that time or even a bit before and yes there is evidence mutually it's a bit from spain and some from france or some from the united kingdom and what did you feel when reportedly you weren't given some of the data you wanted i mean have you got this rule patient into 174 covert patients from december 21000 the who are requesting. that's true i sort of do a number of things chinese to do before we got there including going back to looking through the last couple of months before december trying to identify potential traces the amount of mist and we insisted on that being done and they did it and they presented no were of course only there for a short period of time so not all the darter that we wo

long way to planning what needs to be done did any of the authorities in china say you shouldn't mean wuhan you should be in italy given their code without the bodies were circulating in italy in september of 2019 way before december i mean there's no doubt the virus exploded in with them there's no question about that now the issue is was the virus circulating in other parts of the world 'd around that time or even a bit before and yes there is evidence mutually it's a bit from spain as some from france to some from the united kingdom and what did you feel when reportedly you weren't given some of the data you wanted i mean have you got this rule patient into 174 covert patients from december 21000 the who are requesting. that's true i sort of do a number of things chinese sought to do before we got there including going back to looking through the last couple of months before december trying to identify potential traces the amount of mist and we insisted on that being done and they did it and they presented were no were of course only there for a short period of time so not all the darter