the store, it can be on the u. s. and e, you have agreed to a 5 year plan that would suspend terrorists connected to the air bus boeing dispute . the deal also includes the creation of a working group to negotiate subsidy limits, before disagreements get out of hand. we want of course, to expend us trade and investments, but we also want to discuss how we avoid new unjustified technical barriers and how to cooperate in areas with high potential from our economy, specially of course in the digital technology reaching a detailed chord, however, was not easy, given the long legal wrangling, the souring of relations and the negative impact the dispute has had on trade and on other sectors of the economy. in 2019 the u. s. slapped $7500000000.00 of tariffs on wine cheese and all of among other things that you struck back in 2024 1000000000 dollars worth of duties on suitcases. rum and nuts, even harley davidson motor bikes. the 2 side suspended terrorists earlier this year that suspension will now continue for the 1st the

the facing, the you and the u. s. going forward. things like that. women of steel tariffs that remain in place on you, metals that were posted to the trumpet administration, as well as the broader question of how closely the e u plans to align itself with the u. s. and their battle with china over a competition financial corresponded. chelsea delaney there, as you mentioned, there are other tariffs and dispute, including the steel levies imposed by the u. s. in 2018. those tariffs force you to introduce import quarters of steel to the top of a lot of the metal from china. but that's led to shortages and skyrocketing prices . the 2nd truck company in western germany makes stamped components for automobiles . the machine is constantly supplied with high grade rolled steel straight from the furnace. last year, tech trip paid $4900.00 euros for a relative steel. now it's $9000.00 tech and trucks. managing director blames the massive price icon. you protectionism, which is closed off the steel market here in guessing type home port quote

and the u. s. is not only concerned about iran, it's also concerned about domestic perception of engagement with iran and about re entering the nuclear deal. so i think it might be a little bit more complex. we don't know whether these are separate trucks or whether they're related. but in terms of censorship, we should, i think, be concerned when these types of approaches are taken and turning the d n as the domain name system into a tool geopolitical information warfare. because that threatens the integrity of the internet and the global network. that is the world wide web. so we want to be very careful about this. scott. i saw you nodding along somewhat. courtney was saying there, did you want to jump in? i think dr. us is absolutely spot on and that is the wider issue here beyond us in your on is the president this such ok, fine us happens to be able to trust the domain registry the us to exert pressure on iran. does it do so with other countries? not only china or russia, if they're perceived

after 17 years, the u. s. and the you have resolve the long standing battle over aircraft subsidies stemming from the dispute between air bus and boeing, our cheese alex mile of it has the story. after nearly 2 decades, things are finally taking off in the right direction. we should not underestimate this is the longest trade dispute in the history of w t o. so it's an our common interest to solve it. and i'm very, i'm very positive and convinced that together we will deliver today and deliver they did a long standing rivalry between 2 of the world's biggest airplane manufacturers, which have been fueled by the u. s. and you government's has halted for the time being the u. s, and you have agreed to suspend tariffs for 5 years in relation to the boeing air bus battle, which is that fought at the w t o. for 17 years. the rivalry has caused plenty of tension between europe and the us with things heating up during the trump administration. in 2019, the world trade organization gave us the green light to bring in

s. and u government's has been halted for the time being the u. s. and you have agreed to suspend tariffs for 5 years in relation to the boeing air bus battle, which is at bought at the w t o. ready for 17 years, the rivalry has caused plenty of tensions between europe and the us with things heating up during the trump administration. in 2019, the world trade organization gave us the greenlight to bring in tariffs worth up to $7500000000.00 on products from the u. that was in response to illegal government support of boeing's rival, european playmaker, airbus. and just last year, the w t o ruled in favor of the european union, concluding that illegal aid was given to jet plane manufacturer. boeing by the us government, the plan to impose $4000000000.00 in tariffs against the u. s. and action which the block chose to delay until after the 2020 us election after which point tensions already began to ease those. my remember very well, it started when i got my 1st phone call by president biden in february, and there we jointly decided to solve this probl

you know, the u. s. depends on the u. s. on germany a lot and especially german chancellor angle america. and we know that she will be stepping down in september and with her leaving the european union, washington are going to lose a window to the kremlin. and she's even been called the put in whisper. how can that that loss if you will be, or the gap be fil, once she's gone? well that's, that's the huge question. we have to answering the german national elections there . the problem to right now, mr. lash at the grid, democratic candidate for championship. in the past, he was a little bit unclear sometimes about his rational position with the free democrats . we think that he will be much clearer, but therefore we invest in the future coalition because we are the party of transatlantic partnership. we invest very much as we democrats, traditionally in partnership with the united states. so if we will be in accordance with him, with mr. lashley, we will make sure that her trans atlantic cars will be really on the prom page o

the u. s. c. p. intelligence and in agency coordination division, knew about social media posts calling for violence of the capital and journey of the 6, including a plot to breach the capital, the online sharing of maps of the capital complex, this tunnel systems, and other specific threats of violence. yet the i, c, d, did not convey the full scope of known information to us. c, p, leadership rank and file offices or law enforcement partners. so the secret service and police intelligence were aware of a possible but did not do anything and did not share this information. how could one be aware of the fact that a group of people was planning on storming the u. s. capital building and do nothing. looks like this report raises more questions than answers, kaleb mop and r t new york. and any stories you missed on you can always check them out of your ledger online. the website is artsy, dot com. in the meantime, thanks for joining us. we're back in about half an hour. ah, driven by jan shaped by tho

but the fact of the matter is, the u. s. has lost the war, and the u. s. is leaving, which they had to do eventually. but it's never easy for politicians or generals to take responsibility. thus the approximations by blinking and others that some how the us president will still remain. i don't think so. it just to follow. all right, on your point about the taliban. they were furious when the u. s. miss, they may 1st deadline. launching a series of deadly attacks if there was a suicide bombing cabal. it kills some 27 people. how do you think they're going to view the latest signals coming from washington? i think the taliban know full well what the real relationship of forces is on the ground in afghanistan. this kind of media generating announcements that the u. s. may be prepared to carry out the air strikes in the event that the taliban will could be seen and tell him will would be viewed by the taliban in much the same way as the vietnamese in 1975 would have viewed american proclamation that they weren't going to abandon their south vietnamese, l, y, i

the u. s. c . p. intelligence and in the agency coordination division. knew about social media posts calling for violence of the capital journey of the 6, including a plot to breach the capital, the online sharing of maps of the capital complex as tunnel systems, and other specific threats of violence. yet the i, c, d, did not convey the full scope of known information to us. c, p, leadership rank and file offices or law enforcement partners. so the secret service and police intelligence were aware of a possible but did not do anything and did not share this information. how could one be aware of the fact that a group of people is planning on storming the u. s. capital building and do nothing . looks like this report raises more questions than answers, kaleb mop and r t new york. the pentagon is warning the terrorist groups and i've gotten this. dawn could expand their reach off the u. s. pull out and pose an international threat. the issue was raised at a senate here. how would you rate the, the l

the u. s. c . p. intelligence and in the agency coordination division. knew about social media posts calling for violence of the capital and journey of the 6, including a plot to breach the capital, the online sharing of maps of the capital complex as tunnel systems, and other specific threats of violence. yet the i, c, d, did not convey the full scope of known information to us. c, p, leadership rank and file offices or law enforcement partners. so the secret service and police intelligence were aware of a possible but did not do anything and did not share this information. how could one be aware of the fact that a group of people was planning on storming the u. s. capital building and do nothing. looks like this report raises more questions than answers, kaleb mop and r t new york. the pentagon warning the terrorist groups in afghanistan could expand the reach shift to the u. s. pull out and posing international practice and issue that was raised in a senate hearing. how would you rate the, the l

and 2 in the u. s. is talking like it's a bilateral summit, but it's not, it's really, it's a rush of versus a multilateral pho, on the other side of the table. ah . driven by a dreamer shaped by those in me dares thing we dare to ask any for the boy what a 41 back to safety were at 1st offered rog, 2011. there were about 40 or 50 people there. here in miami, we got 12000 tickets, all the router, some estimates what a 45000 mat out, a sick want to get set to go global, take over the global economy and put all the circle back out of business. the. i guess we'll just add those highly anticipated talks between the russian u. s. leaders and they tow summit in brussels to set a pretty aggressive tone alliance leaders of declared that china poses a constant security challenge is working to undermine global order. while the 30 heads of state and government avoided calling, china arrival it is the 1st time the traditionally russia focused military alliance is asserted, its needs now to respond to a james growin

s. hesitates to put any real kind of strict sanctions as a result of that is because the u. s. is doing it as well. the fact that the state constantly does isn't the ca doesn't. we know they say we're talking in the angle of merkel cell phone just a couple of years ago. right. and so if you create a big deal out of punishing countries that spy on other countries, when the us would be right in the cross hairs of their own policies. but you know, to the question of creating a stable, predictable relationship. i was watching the news conferences afterwards, and there was a very interesting question that was asked about ukraine to put in about what, what about creating stability there and you've been the state life and the region. and his response, i thought, was pretty interesting. he says, it's not russia that's the stabilizing. that part of the world is the us. he says in ukraine, back in 2014, the u. s. wanted a new election. they were set to hold a new election and that wasn't good enough. so there was a, a qu, they over through the government, they replaced and installed thei

s. hesitates to put any real kind of strict sanctions as a result of that is because of the u. s. is doing it as well. the fact that the in us, they constantly does isn't the ca, doesn't we know in a say what's happening in the angle of merkel cell phone just a couple of years ago. right. and so if you create a big deal out of punishing countries that spy on other countries, when the us would be right in the cross hairs of their own policies. but you know, to the question of creating a stable, predictable relationship. i was watching the news conferences afterwards, and there was a very interesting question that was asked about ukraine to put in about what, what about creating stability there and you've been the state life and the region. and his response, i thought, was pretty interesting. he says, it's not russia that's the stabilizing that part of the world in the us. he says in ukraine, back in 2014 the u. s. one of the new election. they were set to hold a new election and that wasn't good enough. so there was a, a qu, they over through the government, they replaced and insta

s. down and the u. s. would prefer biding, would prefer, as trump preferred to spend that energy in those military forces confronting china, which the empire considers to be a greater threat right now then i'll kind of the peaceful rise of china. and china is essential, especially in asia, has been sort of unintended to as the u. s. has been preoccupied with wars either in the middle east or in just the taliban. they know control large parts of i've got to stand some reports even seeing as much as half of the country. is it no inevitable about the takeover completely wants the u. s. leaves? not necessarily. you know that the television actually does control about as much or maybe more territory than it did when it was the government of afghanistan prior to the october 7th, 2001 us invasion of the country.

because on the one hand, the u. s. is calling for open communication and fair competition with china. with that, on the other hand now wants to subsidize and grant funds and fund the us tech industry with a free $250000000000.00 steroids injection money. so it isn't really exactly practicing what it's preaching either. and now lastly, china is also passing their own logic counter for in sanctions. what do we know about that? very little right now. the national people of congress has passed law thursday to counter the sanctions and the pressure is currently facing from the e. you over trade and technology. so details have not been in the east, but it's the latest and most legal set of tools to respond. and it's intended to give chinese itala tory met with jimmy and more predictability. and it's likely this is in response to the fact that it foresees more hurdles ahead and potentially more sanctions that will be coming down. so it's designed to get china predictability since it has an acute trump of being irrational, unp

the u. s. is leading this initiative to launch something similar, a sort of rival to that because it says china's belton road program has no transparency. it says it doesn't meet environmental and labor standards. and it says the countries that have invested investment from china going to end up in china's debt. so they're coming out with something called the building back. better for the world initiative. b 3, w is what it's going to be known as it's u. s. plan but it's been back now by the g 7 leaders and they say that it's going to fill a gap of funding for infrastructure projects around the world. that is 40 trillion dollars between now and 2035. the problem with it. well, as you said, china got the head start, they've been doing this for years. the project from the u. s. and the g 7, it's still on the drawing board, but also where is the funding and come from? and there's no idea of that as a tool angular mark merkle, the german chancellor speaking area. and she said that there's no fundin

the u. s. president is keen to challenge the kremlin boss on is what the west sees as issues with human rights in russia. well, it almost looks like the nbc, corresponding to himself had a plan to take up that challenge instead of mr. biden. and it all led to quite an exchange with constant interruptions and mr. prudent, even stressing at one point, don't gag me. let me ask you about human rights, an issue that a president biden will raise mister president, and he will raise the issue of alexia, tolerated for us a nation nominal russian jail. mister president, why are you so threatened by your position? who says that i feel threatened by a position or will threaten by opposition. so who told you that i'm scared by opposition? just lawful in the united states law on foreign agents with adopted a long time ago. it's in operation and sanctions under that law. a much harsher than here up to and including imprison that you go to the other if you must, the patients and let me finish saying what i mea

you know, the u. s. depends on the u. s on germany a lots and especially german chancellor angle americans and we know that she will be stepping down in september and with her leaving the european union, washington are going to lose a window to the kremlin. and she's even been called the put in whisper. how can that that loss if you will be, or the gap be filled when she's gone? well that's, that's the huge question. we have to answering the german national elections or the front runner right now, mr. lash at the griffin democratic candidate for championship. in the past, he was a little bit unclear sometimes about his rational position with the free democrats . we think that he will be much clearer, but therefore we invest in the future coalition because we are the party of transatlantic partnership. we invest very much as we democrats, traditionally in partnership with the united states. so if we will be in accordance with him, with mr. ashlee, we will make sure better transatlantic cars will be really on the prom page

but the u. s. really wants to come to terms with ross russia nevertheless, so it doesn't consume so much energy and time that it's actually needed for other topics. and that is china in particular. ok, and we will of course, be following that story for you. d. w correspondent oliver's solid and he was always let's take a look now. are some other stories making headlines at this hour hungry? the parliament has passed a law banning content or training or promoting homosexuality or sex reassignment surgery to children. that was in protested outside parliament in budapest, prime minister victor or been conservative, party unveiled the legislation last week. fresh protests have broken out in men mar against the countries ruling. the military junta, the fight heavy rain, hundreds took to the streets in the country south to demand a return to civilian rule. the demonstration coming day after opposition leader on concert, she went on trial accused of sedition. and hundreds of far right is really protesters

and the u. s. is not only concerned about iran, it's also concerned about domestic perception of engagement with iran and about re entering the nuclear deal. so i think it might be a little bit more complex. we don't know whether these are separate trucks or whether they're related. but in terms of censorship, we should, i think, be concerned when these types of approaches are taken and turning the d n as the domain name system into a tool geopolitical information warfare. because that threatens the integrity of the internet and the global network. that is the world wide web. so we want to be very careful about this. scott. i saw you nodding along somewhat. courtney was saying there, did you want to jump in? i think dr. rush is absolutely spot on, and that is the wider issue here beyond us in your, on is the president this such ok, fine. yours happens to be able because the domains, your registry. you asked to exert pressure on your, on. does it do so with other countries? not only china, russia, i

john, i think the u. s. tried to partner with china and there was a hope in the west that through economic development and through prosperity, china would join the family of democratic nations that there would be a hunger in the chinese society for democratic reforms. and that hasn't happened to me that exists clearly in china, but it has been snuffed out. so this is why it has become this rivalry of sin systems. and this is why biden is concerned not just by this is a bipartisan issue to and wash a bite and share that with the european needs to bring the europeans onside the united states has tried to do this, i think with some success by explaining to the europeans and convincing them of the danger that exists. and we saw this in this debate over 5 g network technology that the chinese company was way, was very eager to sell in europe, and is eager to sell in europe in the united states game. and tried to convince the european allies that if they were to take on this technology that they would be opening t

come what the u. s. has promised the people there in other countries and cow what the u. s. has delivered. we only seen countless people who died and the economies went into recessions. and on the other hand, the weakest have been living in china for hundreds of years. there are many efforts to be harmony and friendships between the weakest and han chinese. there is just solely to chance to be great. rigorous will be a will, china and the west is making the lives we get worse by separating the weakest from their countrymen. the west, the media have completely ignore the fact that many han chinese went to the desert while when senior was very poor, did han chinese start with nothing to build a currency john, where you see green and foot everywhere. there were some media also. you know, disagree with the media, allowing the west to have a strong focus on terrorism in their own countries. but i complete site and about the terrorism happened in saint john. just like many countries in china, religious rights cannot be above the law. did not emphasize. i was just going to mention

u. s. the vice president, kamala harris has concluded her 1st trip to latin america, and she visited guatemala and mexico, though not to the surprise of some the us mexico border. this is currently in the grip of a migrant crisis. something harris has been tasked with tackling. and when asked if she has any plans of going to the board or she became somewhat evasive. you have any plans to visit the board at some point, you know, we are going to the board if you haven't been to the border. and i haven't been to europe hours his visit was met with protests, both in mexico and guatemala. the us border with mexico soul, $178000.00 immigrants, stopped in april, the highest monthly total in 2 decades. during her tour, the vice president made it clear that would be migrants were not welcome, but promised investment to improve their lives in some way. that goes be looked at why not everyone is free to come to the land of the free. the white house doesn't like to use the word crisis when referring to

because on the one hand, the u. s. is calling our open communication and spare competition with china. but then on the other hand, it now wants to subsidize and grant fund and fund the u. s. tech industry with a free $250000000000.00 steroids injection money. so it isn't really exactly practicing what it's preaching either. and now lastly, china is also passing their own logic counter for and sanctions. what do we know about that? very little right now. the national people of congress has passed a law thursday to counter these sanctions, and the pressure is currently facing from the e. you over trade and technology. the details have not been in the east, but it's the latest and most legal set of tools to respond. and it's intended to give chinese retaliatory met with gibby and more predictability. and it's likely. ringback this is in response to the fact that at 4 speed more hurdles up ahead and potentially more sanctions that will be coming down. so it's designed to get china predictability since it has an acute probl

the u. s. c. p. intelligence and in the agency coordination division, knew about social media posts calling for violence of the capital on july, the 6th, including a plot to breach the capital, the online sharing of maps of the capital complex as tunnel systems, and other specific threats of violence. yet the i, c, d, did not convey the full scope of known information to us. c, p, leadership rank and file offices or law enforcement partners. so the secret service and police intelligence were aware of a possible but did not do anything and did not share this information. how could one be aware of the fact that a group of people was planning on storming the u. s. capital building and do nothing. looks like this report raises more questions than answers, kaleb mop and r t new york. the u. s. flag is supposed to be a symbol of freedom and justice, but it's falling out of grace with the walk of brigade. r and b singer macy gray wants it to be redesigned to be more inclusive and an off it gray objects t

i don't see the u. s. a green to anything. and there's also the issue of nato, and this is obviously going to be a big concern for russia. but again, i don't see the united states giving any consolations with regards to the advancement and the pressure which nato is putting on. this is what was happening at the g 7 the announced a new atlantic charter. i mean, this are the us and britain and their allies already spelled out that they're going to continue to posture in an aggressive fashion against russia. so it doesn't leave a lot in terms of negotiations and leverage. they are, it seems to be all take from the u. s. and no give it, doesn't it? when he, when he put it like that, but they have like what they do want to talk about. so you the environment cove, it cybersecurity say you would shane. there's been a lot of talking before they've even got close to the table on wednesday to decide you know what they can and can't do, and it's not going to look good for either lead or if they decided nothing and just argued for a few h

the u. s. had imposed as $7500000000.00 worth of terrorist on not just plains from air bus, but also a broad range of goods. everything from italian cheese to french wine. so a lot of industries have been struggling under these terrorists and especially now in the pen demik, many would see a lot of relief from having those that permanently or at least for a longer amount of time or moved, arrives. wellness views out of the way. we can focus on other trade topics, one of the most pressing issues that should be tackled today will, china is really underlying all of these conversations right now between brussels in the united states, even the removal of the air bus at boeing terrace has a china angle in the u. s. and you are very concerned about china is growing business in air and aircraft. they want to unseat the u, the u. s. u. so there's a lot of focus right now on how the u and the u. s. conform a bigger block against china, they also likely are to discuss today new efforts to come together to

the u. s. c . p. intelligence and in the agency coordination division. knew about social media posts calling for violence at the capital on july, the 6th, including a pot to breach the capital, the online sharing of maps of the capital complex as tunnel systems, and other specific threats of violence. yet the i, c, d, did not convey the full scope of known information to us. c, p, leadership rank and file offices or law enforcement partners. so the secret service and police intelligence were aware of a possible but did not do anything and did not share this information. how could one be aware of the fact that a group of people is planning on storming the u. s. capital building and do nothing . looks like this report raises more questions than answers, kaleb mop and r t new york. the pentagon is warning the terrorist groups and i've gotten us on could expand the reach off of the u. s. pull out and pose an international threat. and the issue was raised at a hearing in the senate. how would you rate t

i think the u. s. tried to partner with china and there was a hope in the west that through economic development and through prosperity, china would join the family of democratic nations that there would be a hunger in the chinese society for democratic reforms. and that hasn't happened. i mean, it exists clearly in china, but it has been snuffed out. so this is why it has become this rivalry obscene systems. and this is why biden is concerned not just by this is a bipartisan issue, bite into and washing bite and making the, with the european needs to bring the europeans onside the united states has tried to do this, i think with some success by explaining to the europeans and convincing them of the danger that exist. and we saw this in this debate over 5 g network technology that the chinese company was way, was very eager to sell in europe, and is eager to sell in europe in the united states game. and tried to convince the european allies that if they were to take on this technology, that they would

the u. s. c . p. intelligence and into agency coordination division. knew about social media posts calling for violence of the capital and journey of the 6, including a plot to breach the capital, the online sharing of maps of the capital complex as tunnel systems, and other specific threats of violence. yet the i, c, d, did not convey the full scope of known information to us. c, p, leadership rank and file offices or law enforcement partners. so the secret service and police intelligence were aware of a possible but did not do anything and did not share this information. how could one be aware of the fact that a group of people was planning on storming the u. s. capital building and do nothing. looks like this report raises more questions than answers, kaleb mop and r t new york. the pentagon, his warning terrorist groups in afghanistan could expand the reach, shift to the u. s. pull out and pose an international threat. the issue was raised in a sanitary. how would you rate the, the likelihood o

s. hesitates to put any real kind of strict sanctions as a result of that is because the u. s. is doing it as well. the fact of the inner state constantly does is in the ca doesn't we know they say we're talking into anglo merkel cell phone just a couple of years ago. right. and so if you create a big deal out of punishing countries that spy on other countries, well then the us would be right in the cross hairs of their own policies. but you know, to the question of creating a stable, predictable relationship. i was watching the news conferences afterwards and there was a very interesting question that was asked about ukraine to pollutant about what, what about creating stability there and you've been the state life in the region. and his response, i thought was pretty interesting. he says, it's not russia that's the stabilizing. that part of the world is the us. he says in ukraine, back in 2014 the u. s. one of the new election. they were set to hold a new election and that wasn't good enough. so there was a, a qu, they over through the government, they replaced and installed

because the u. s. is also uniquely one of the most geographically diverse countries that you will ever see. and with 50 different states, all with different sets of politics, different sets of approaches to this pandemic. this is not a one size fits all by any means, especially in the south where you still see the vaccination rates well below 30 to 20 and 30 percent. i've seen in other countries around the world, of course the variance do develop the can development anytime under any circumstances. in new york, it's lifting measures, but 70 percent of i don't have only received one vaccine dose. and if i understand correctly the, the, the general accepted and rationale, if you like, is that to is essentially the minimum to be able to protect people. are people going to be complacent using i think it's been a long year. and so what we're seeing is some people not really understanding how important it is to follow the exact exact science that we studied during the clinical trials for these vaccines. espe

and then the u. s. is going to collaborate in building hope. it home when it's exactly the opposite, any u. s. official or diplomat who arrives in central america should arrive 1st leading with apologies, in leading with talks of reparations for the enormous damage. the u. s. foreign policy in neil colonialism have done this, is it crisis for a situation the why the house prefers to call it? that was entirely avoidable biden. and the democrats used my good, the g political tool to attack trump to win the election, but somehow lose city refugees got into their heads the go biden. and alan t harris actually give a damn about them. the austrian police say they've arrested 81 people as part of a global sting operation led by america the f. b. i is claiming to have court more than $800.00 criminals worldwide including alms and drug dealers by tricking them into using an encrypted app. the u. s agency apparently was alongside australia, it's federal police and he's pictures. you can see some of those arrests happening in australia and in europe. the

the u. s. c . p. intelligence and in agency coordination division. knew about social media posts calling for violence of the capital and journey of the 6, including a plot to breach the capital, the online sharing of maps of the capital complex, this tunnel systems, and other specific threats of violence. yet the i, c, d, did not convey the full scope of known information to us. c, p, leadership rank and file offices or law enforcement partners. so the secret service and police intelligence were aware of a possible but did not do anything and did not share this information. how could one be aware of the fact that a group of people was planning on storming the u. s. capital building and do nothing. looks like this report raises more questions than answers, kaleb mop and r t new york. the american flag is supposed to be a symbol of freedom and justice, but it's falling out of grace with the wolf brigade. r and b singer macy gray wants it to be redesigned to be more inclusive in opposite gray objects

the u. s. plan called build back better as part of president jo bivens efforts to form a more unified front to compete economically with china. preventing another pandemic is also a main point of discussion today. it's understood that the leaders will pledge to work out ways to stamp out future outbreaks within the 1st $100.00 days. let's go live now to what you're going to counsel. and so i've not far from the summit video diplomatic editor james base is there, sir. james? china is belton, wrote initiative, is to get some competition. how's that going to work? and why g 7 lead us? so concerned about the resurgence of china deeply worried about china and china's influence in the world and whether that is good for the world and good for their own countries. it's the u. s. initiative that is being proposed, but it seems now to be backed by all of the g 7 and will be reflected in the final communique, a rival to the belts and road initiative, which now has spokes all over the world in latin americ

the u. s. c. p. intelligence and in the agency coordination division, knew about social media posts calling for violence of the capital and journey of the 6, including a plot to breach the capital, the online sharing of maps of the capital complex as tunnel systems, and other specific threats of violence. yet the i, c, d, did not convey the full scope of known information to us. c, p, leadership rank and file offices or law enforcement partners. so the secret service and police intelligence were aware of a possible but did not do anything and did not share this information. how could one be aware of the fact that a group of people was planning on storming the u. s. capital building and do nothing. looks like this report raises more questions than answers, kaleb mop and r t new york. there are some of you or something they headlines for you this program live for moscow. thanks for joining us off your international program returns. let's top of the me ah, with the the, the the ah, me the imax kaiser

and he's not getting that answer from the u. s. so perhaps we are to expect the what should leader to bring these things up during the summit, and possibly, he will be looking for that stability and predictability. but we know that joe biden wants to same, but he's talking about something completely different. that's human rights that cyber attacks. well, i guess we can move on to the cyber attacks and because it's been in the news again, hasn't it? has peyton responded to those us claims of russian cyber attacks? i can quote here, cure simon said that he's got a weight of evidence that rushes behind cyber attacks on us institutions, an infrastructure, and then began listing them. he said, let me give you 5. in particular, he mentioned the cyber attacks on the selection system in the year 2016. then in 2020, he mentioned the colonial pipeline hack and so on and so forth. but then a lot of our prudent almost instantly responded by saying, well, these are the political statements that are being made by us politicians and us governmen

they were killed in monday's u. s. s. like in car m district near the iraqi border with syria and met. but i mean, what i did was, i don't have that, that, how much the rifles and drones of the resistance will mobilize now the time has come to events, the death of our heroes, including costume, still a money and i must deal more hon this and you know, there was a heavy security presence in the area. the, with the tree took songs and then themes, the protests to the 3, the banners, what they call resistance military commanders of the popular mobilization forces. and political leaders say they want to convey a message to the international community about the law in parliament passed a resolution in the presence of foreign troops in the country is unlawful. they've been here since 2014 and they have nothing to offer a rocking but destruction. pentagon accuses those are targeted of launching drone attacks against us personnel and facilities and iraq. the popular mobilization horse, the united killed the members were part of i

there's going to be a role back on the u. s. and you financial sanctions that have really served to isolate russia in the financial community. and so what we expect is that there is just going to be a restoration of basic channels of communication. in other words, nothing big could come out of this, but instead it will be that sort of framework for the lower level diplomats to kind of try and build. but again, a lot of criticism that many people are saying why hold this at all? yeah, just a reminder, we just look at the scene here at the airport at geneva, that's the russian president's plane. we're waiting for him to the symbolic. you can see the, the mass ranks of his security detail there and are his bodyguards station to awaiting his arrival. for his departure then to the shores of lake geneva, where he'll hold that summit with the us president, president joe biden. it says that something is expected last summer and can be and what areas do you think they may find some kind of common ground? well, i, you know, the problem is

and so also an acknowledgement that the u. s. has lost the war. if the u. s. has been bombing taliban positions while it was occupied with large numbers of military forces and u. s. military bases in afghanistan for 2 decades. and that did not defeat the taliban. why would the resumption of air strike after the u. s. is gone? why would that be effective militarily? so what's happening is, the pentagon and the bi ministration are now pointing fingers and debating and trying to provide some semblance of a plan b when they leave. and should the country fall to the taliban? if in fact, the afghan military can sustain itself, which is very likely, the fact of the matter is the u. s. has lost the war, and the u. s. is leaving, which they had to do eventually. but it's never easy for politicians or generals to take responsibility. thus the proclamations by blinking and others that somehow the us present will still remain. i don't think so. is rarely police used to stun grenades on thursday to disperse hundreds of palestinians who gathered in jerusalem's old city to p

you know, in recent decades the u. s. is really shy away from providing government support for certain industries. is this era now at an end? it definitely marks a big shift. i mean, we have to wait also for the house of representatives to approve, but it seems to be pretty likely that we actually might for change the, this bipartisan support. if you look what happened in the past couple of years of federal spending for research and development was less than one percent of the grid to mystic product. and that was the lowest federal spending for the industry if you want to put it that way. basically since the moon landing, so since the 16th, and it's not just this plan that the biden administration announced that we also have those $2000000.00 infrastructure packages that are also set on the sidelines. so yes, so the button administration really seems to make a big step and make a big change when it comes to government involvement in the industry and in the economy overall. you know, the ideal of globalized trade was that

you know, the u. s. no one in the international community interfered and came to, to help the people of china and china was a poor country. they didn't have any high technology. they didn't have any scientific innovation at the time. people were leaving china, you know, in, in the millions we have a huge chinese diaspora around the world. and no one asked why there's so many cheap chinese people around the world. i don't think that biden is as cynical in his approach to china. i think he really has a deep seated believe the human. why do matter that this is? and he mentioned that the press conference that this is a part of u. s. foreign policy. so i think he does not only see it in terms of great power. do you politically competition with china, but he sees it as a competition of systems, especially since of chinese system has become more and more autocratic in the last .

and so also an acknowledgement that the u. s. has lost the war. if the u. s. has been bombing taliban positions while it was occupied with large numbers of military forces and u. s. military bases in afghanistan for 2 decades. and that did not defeat the taliban. why would the resumption of air strike after the u. s. is gone? why would that be effective militarily? so what's happening is, the pentagon and the bi ministration are now pointing fingers and debating and trying to provide some semblance of a plan b when they leave. and should the country fall to the taliban? if in fact, the afghan military can sustain itself, which is very likely, fact of the matter is the u. s. s. last, the war, and the u. s. is leaving, which they had to do eventually. but it's never easy for politicians or generals to take responsibility. thus the approximations by blinking and others that some how the us present will still remain. i don't think so. revenues are railey police used stun grenades on thursday to disperse hundreds of palestinians who gathered in jerusalem's old city

because on the one hand, the u. s. is calling our open communication and spare competition with china. but then on the other hand now wants to subsidize and grant fund and fund the u. s. tech industry with a free $250000000000.00 steroids injection money. so it isn't really exactly practicing what it's preaching either. and now lastly, china is also passing their own logic counter for and sanctions. what do we know about that? very little right now. the national people of congress has passed law thursday to counter these sanctions, and the pressure is currently facing from the e. you over trade and technology. the details have not been in the east, but it's the latest and most legal set of tools to respond. and it's intended to give chinese itala tory met with jimmy and more predictability. and it's likely. ringback this is in response to the fact that at 4 speed more hurdles up ahead and potentially more sanctions that will be coming down. so it's designed to get china predictability since it has an acute trump of bei

you know, the u. s. depends on the u. s. on germany a lots and especially german chancellor angle america. and we know that she will be stepping down in september and with her leaving the european union, washington are going to lose a window to the kremlin. and she's even been called the put in whisper. how can that, that last if you will be, or the gap be filled once she's gone? well that's, that's the huge question. we have to answering the german national elections at the front runner right now. and the last, it's a big written democratic candidate transfer ship. in the past, he was a little bit unclear sometimes about his rational position with the free democrats . we think that he will be much clearer, but therefore we invest in the future coalition because we are the party of transatlantic partnership. we invest very much as we democrats, traditionally in partnership with the united states. so if we will be in accordance with him, with mr. lasha, we will make sure better transatlantic cars will be really on the prom pa

the u. s. c . p. intelligence and in the agency coordination division. knew about social media posts calling for violence of the capital and journey of the 6, including a plot to breach the capital, the online sharing of maps of the capital complex as tunnel systems, and other specific threats of violence. yet the i, c, d, did not convey the full scope of known information to us. c, p, leadership rank and file offices or law enforcement partners. so the secret service and police intelligence were aware of a possible but did not do anything and did not share this information. how could one be aware of the fact that a group of people was planning on storming the u. s. capital building and do nothing. looks like this report raises more questions than answers, kaleb mop and r t new york. for now, we're developing situation right here at moscow. we understand a fireworks warehouse is on fire near the city center and several explosions have been heard. the burning building is near lucian, the key stadium

ok if the u. s. you know, once to say it owns all the marbles on the playground, you know, and walks off with them fine, there's a world beyond the united states. okay. and the d dollarization that's going on left and right across the world it's, it's again, self inflicted here. let me, let me go to the glen here, glen, i mean, why should russia care really? i mean, you know, there are alternatives to the swiss system, right now. they have burgeoning relationships in asia. that's where global growth is. 20 percent of the global growth immediately after the pandemic is all in asia. i mean, is it really worth it? i mean, to be part of their little clubs where, you know, they discuss critical race theory and woke ism and all of it isn't really worth it . i mean, i don't really understand most of it. i don't even, i don't even want to engage in it. i mean, it's their own self demise. okay. that they're tied up in. why should russia care? go ahead? well, it used to care more because again, since at least

the u. s. leaving the abm treaty in 2002 with absolutely unpredictable. what were they doing it for that undermine the basis of international stability in the area of strategic security. then withdrew from the i n f treaty in 2019. there's nothing stable about that's the open sky treaty withdrawal. there's nothing stable about it and almost nothing left. thank god, in the field of strategic stability. mr. biden has taken a completely adequate decision to prolong the new start treaty for 5 years. if you take the situation with ukraine with crimea, that's where this all starts, right? what stable about endorsing the coup d'etat when the ex president the cove each agreed with all. ready the demands of the opposition, he was basically ready to abandon power, declared new elections in about 3 months. no, the blood filled qu was needed that lead to known consequences the southeast of the country than crimea. and do you think it's us who predictably, no, i don't think so. we just listed the president

and so also an acknowledgement that the u. s. has lost the war. if the u. s. has been bombing taliban positions while it was occupied with large numbers of military forces and u. s. military bases in afghanistan for 2 decades. and that did not defeat the taliban. why would the resumption of air strikes after the u. s. is gone? why would that be effective militarily? so what's happening is, the pentagon and the by the ministration are now pointing fingers and debating and trying to provide some semblance of a plan b when they leave. and should the country fall to the taliban? if in fact, the afghan military can't sustain itself, which is very likely, the fact of the matter is the u. s. has lost the war, and the u. s. is leaving, which they had to do eventually. but it's never easy for politicians or generals to take responsibility. thus the proclamations by blinking and others that somehow us present will still remain. i don't think so. just a reminder, if you'd like to delve deeper into any of this, our stories, our website is a solid jumping off point check a

so we are waiting for clarification from the u. s. department of justice. we're also waiting to hear any statement from the islamic republic of iran at the moment. these 3 websites bear this. notice i'm not clear yet what has gone on. could this be the work of hackers? could this actually be an official move from the u. s. government could this indeed have been ordered directly from joe biden, as the statement of the website seems to hand. we don't yet know. honda, most savvy professor of political science at the university of tehran, says washington can have no justification if it is indeed behind the moves. we have to remember that even if the laws that are being cited in the actual announcement on the web page, even if the reason cited would be in the gym in which actually isn't. we have to remember that the, these are us internal laws and apps. what you would be ridiculous to sees an international new size based on domestic us thought. it's like the other situation would be, i pathetically, if iran would come and see the c n n news website, based on int