the kids and adolescents we saw natalie bennett, appealing directly to adolescence, to get the vaccine. what, what, how big a role do adolescence play in the fight against corona, vars? we actually know that cobra is not very dangerous to offense. we know that some of the lessons that we come to saw so full of symptoms and for coffee and some complicated they were diploma for danger. the files but not very dangerous. they, they keep seeming very same number listing and therefore we have enough supply to make for $500000.00. and we think it will be very faithful them and we'll pick them against a acquiring b c. and then we implemented government and bring us to making an attempt to meet the cation campaign, to encourage the lesson, to go and get the vaccinate press election from the center for travel medicine and tropical diseases at sheep medical center in israel. thank you very much. thank you and asked her not some of the other stories making headlines for my south african president, jacob's duma is defying a court deadline to give himself up to the authorities. same. it was found gu

bennett, is claiming others are to blame for his mounting problems and forms the times of the opposition to exhaust us with a 1000 exercises infringe. and that it is okay that democracy and we know how to do both. but there are points when even in the opposition national responsibility must be shown. the security of the country is the red line. the much hilton unit in its new coalition had failed at it's very 1st attempt. the government's vote to stop that kind of civilians marry 2 ladies, getting citizenship. funk split white down the middle, 594, and 59 against as 5 members of the ruling coalition immediately broke rank. and that despite bennett early, a warning that this was important vote of confidence in his new government. so what went wrong? however, the votes in favor of the legislation and expressing confidence in the government. whatever votes against it is expressing no confidence in the government. the citizenship and internal was initially passed in 2003 at the time of the 2nd palestinian uprising following militant attacks in israel. since then, it has repeatedly received a

natalie bennett had one. those who don't would not need to show a negative test to attend public event, as well as seen a sharp rise impacts in spite $0.58. and his hope relation being fully violated. the delta various has both, the government really plays the measure and keep his attorney general says 59 people who took part in and he government protests have been prosecuted. their actions were described as disturbances and charges included public disorder and non unclosing, non serious injury or injuries. rights groups have more than 600 people were detained during and since the july 11th demonstration, that's when thousands of humans took to the street. the morning political change and protesting against for economic conditions. now thousands of people have marched in hungry, in opposition to an education law that they say discriminate against the o g b t community. the demonstration coincided with the annual pride parade of many taking part condemned nationalists, prime minister victor over the law put li

bennett, leads a government that contains left wing and palestinian israeli parties who is set against voting to extend the law. this is a trap for him because it, it's not a law which is on the books. it's emergency action that was taken in 2003 at the height of the 2nd intifada, when there was real proof that people who had used the family unification actually were engaged in terrorist activities against israel. that's not the case to day. now the new position needed benjamin netanyahu is also threatening to vote against it to deal in early defeat to the government. thing that may be if they don't want to give citizenship 215000 palestinians, they have to abstain. we never had right wing national parties voting against this law. the campaign is against the law such comments reinforced of you, that it's about demography not security. you'll hear that the law is necessary for security and to maintain israel as a jewish demo, democratic state. so that should be suspicious to everyone. you know, when you are hearing these 2 justifications, you have to call into question. is it essential

bennett, leads a government that contains left wing and palestinian israeli parties who is set against voting to extend the law. this is a trap for him because it, it's not a law which is on the books. it's emergency action that was taken in 2003 at the height of the 2nd intifada, when there was real proof that people who had use the family unification actually were engaged in terrorist activities against israel. that's not the case to date. now the new position needed benjamin netanyahu is also threatening to vote against it to deal in early defeat, to the government. all of them on the job. if they don't want to give citizenship 215000 palestinians, they have to abstain. we never had right wing national parties voting against this law. the campaign is against the law such comments reinforced of you, that it's about demography not security. you'll hear that the law is necessary for security and to maintain israel as a jewish democratic state. so that should be suspicious to everyone. you know, when you are hearing these 2 justifications, you have to call into question. is it essential

bennett, leads a government that contains left wing and palestinian israeli parties who is set against voting to extend the law. this is a trap for him because it, it's not a law which is on the books. it's emergency action that was taken in 2003 at the height of the 2nd intifada, when there was real proof that people who had use the family unification actually were engaged in terrorist activities against israel. that's not the case to the now the new position leader benjamin netanyahu is also threatening to vote against it. to deal in early defeat, to the government will appear on the job. if they don't want to give citizenship 215000 palestinians, they have to abstain. we never had right wing national parties voting against this law. the campaign is against the law such comments reinforced of you, that it's about demography not security. you'll hear that the law is necessary for security and to maintain israel as a jewish democratic state. so that should be suspicious to everyone. you know, when you are hearing these 2 justifications, you have to call into question, is it essential o

bennett, leads a government that contains left wing and palestinian israeli parties who is set against voting to extend the law. this is a trap for him because it, it's not a law which is on the books. it's emergency action that was taken in 2003 at the height of the 2nd intifada, when there was real proof that people who had use the family unification actually were engaged in terrorist activities against israel. that's not the case to date. now the new position leader benjamin netanyahu is also threatening to vote against it to deal in early defeat, to the government. all of them on the job. if they don't want to give citizenship 215000 palestinians, they have to abstain. we never had right wing national parties voting against this law. the campaign is against the law such comments reinforced of you, that it's about demography not security. you'll hear that the law is necessary for security and to maintain israel as a jewish demo, democratic state. so that should be suspicious to everyone. you know, when you are hearing these 2 justifications, you have to call into question. is it ess

bennett, leads a government that contains left wing and palestinian israeli parties who is set against voting to extend the law. this is a trap for him because it, it's not a law which is on the books. it's emergency action that was taken in 2003 at the height of the 2nd intifada, when there was real proof that people who had used the family unification actually were engaged in terrorist activities against israel. that's not the case to day. now the new position needed benjamin netanyahu is also threatening to vote against it to deal in early defeat, to the government. all of them on the job. if they don't want to give citizenship 215000 palestinians, they have to abstain. we never had right wing national parties voting against this law. the campaign is against the law such comments reinforced of you, that it's about demography not security. you'll hear that the law is necessary for security and to maintain israel as a jewish demo, democratic state. so that should be suspicious to everyone. you know, when you are hearing these 2 justifications, you have to call into question. is it ess

bennett, leads a government that contains left wing and palestinian israeli parties who is set against voting to extend the law. this is a trap for him because it, it's not a law which is on the books, it's emergency action that was taken in 2003 at the height of the 2nd intifada. when there was real proof that people who had use the family unification actually were engaged in terrorist activities against israel, that's not the case to date. now the new position needed benjamin netanyahu is also threatening to vote against it. to deal in early defeat, to the government. thing on the job can be if they don't want to give citizenship 215000 palestinians, they have to abstain. we never had right wing national parties voting against this law. the campaign is against the law such comments reinforced of you, that it's about demography not security. you hear that the law is necessary for security and to maintain israel as a jewish demo, democratic state. so that should be suspicious to everyone. you know, when you are hearing these 2 justifications, you have to call into question. is it essen

bennett, leads a government that contains left wing and palestinian israeli parties who are set against voting to extend the law. this is a trap for him because it, it's not a law which is on the books, it's emergency action that was taken in 2003 at the height of the 2nd intifada. when there was real proof that people who had used the family unification actually were engaged in terrorist activities against israel, that's not the case to the now the new position needed benjamin netanyahu is also threatening to vote against it to deal in early defeat, to the government you know, the thing that may be if they don't want to give citizenship 215000 palestinians, they have to abstain. we never had right wing national parties voting against this law. the campaign is against the law such comments reinforced of you, that it's about demography not security. you hear that the law is necessary for security and to maintain israel as a jewish demo, democratic state. so that should be suspicious to everyone. you know, when you are hearing these 2 justifications, you have to call into question, is it

bennett, leads a government that contains left wing and palestinian israeli parties who is set against voting to extend the law. this is a trap for him because it, it's not a law which is on the books. it's emergency action that was taken in 2003 at the height of the 2nd intifada, when there was real proof that people who had use the family unification actually were engaged in terrorist activities against israel. that's not the case to date. now the new position needed benjamin netanyahu is also threatening to vote against it to deal in early defeat, to the government. all of them on the job. if they don't want to give citizenship 215000 palestinians, they have to abstain. we never had right wing national parties voting against this law. the campaign is against the law such comments reinforced of you, that it's about demography not security. you hear that the law is necessary for security and to maintain israel as a jewish democratic state. so that should be suspicious to everyone. you know, when you are hearing these 2 justifications, you have to call into question. is it essential on

bennett, leads a government that contains left wing and palestinian israeli parties who has set against voting to extend the law. this is a trap for him because it, it's not a law which is on the books, it's emergency action that was taken in 2003 at the height of the 2nd intifada. when there was real proof that people who had used the family unification actually were engaged in terrorist activities against israel, that's not the case to date. now the new position needed benjamin netanyahu is also threatening to vote against it. to deal in early defeat, to the government will be if they don't want to give citizenship 215000 palestinians, they have to abstain. we never had right wing national parties voting against this law. the campaign is against the law such comments reinforced of you, that it's about demography not security. you hear that the law is necessary for security and to maintain israel as a jewish democratic state. so that should be suspicious to everyone. you know, when you are hearing these 2 justifications, you have to call into question. is it essential only for security

i was prime minister natalie bennett was quick to react though a warning unilever of severe consequences and possible legal action. just to put a little perspective for you about unit eva, ben and jerry itself. over here is just one of what is that 8 ice cream brands that you know, leave room has a whole lot of food brands, as well as the se, cosmetics cleaning products, personal care. it is a huge company. brands of which you will be very familiar with, and it is just this one issue with ben and jerry's which has got the israelis concerned. if you look at unit, leave his website here just to give you an idea of a size available and over a 190 countries, all those different products at 2500000000 people using their products every day. with a turnover in 2020 of 51. whoops. and drove about 51000000000 euros. so let's talk to richard levick now ceo of leather, a strategic communications firm with us from washington dc. it's just a lot to bring together here isn't here the ice cream. there's a huge multinational middle east politics and a law which prohibits anyone from disagreeing with isr

bennett, leads a government that contains left wing and palestinian israeli parties who are set against voting to extend the law. this is a trap for him because it, it's not a law which is on the books, it's emergency action that was taken in 2003 at the height of the 2nd intifada. when there was, we proof that people who had used the family unification actually were engaged in terrorist activities against israel. that's not the case to the now the new position needed benjamin netanyahu is also threatening to vote against it to deal in early defeat, to the government. all of them. if they don't want to give citizenship 215000 palestinians, they have to abstain. we never had right wing national parties voting against this law. the campaign is against the law such comments reinforced of you, that it's about demography not security. you'll hear that the law is necessary for security and to maintain israel as a jewish demo, democratic state. so that should be suspicious to everyone. you know, when you are hearing these 2 justifications, you have to call into question. is it essential only f

bennett was quick to react though warning, unilever of severe consequences and possible legal action. just to put a little perspective for you about unilever. ben and jerry's itself over here is just one of what is that 8 i screen brands that you know, leave room has a whole lot of food brands, as well as the se, cosmetics cleaning products, personal care. it is a huge company.

decision does not reflect the position of its boards and it wasn't approved. israel's prime minister natalie bennett, was quick to react warning you need leave of severe consequences and possible legal action. richard levick is ceo of leverick, a strategic communications firm. he says, been in jerry's board, probably miscalculated the repercussions of the decision. it's a very big and complex issue and it's much bigger than just texas, and texas has begun, but so has florida, and there are 28 other states in the united states that have some variation of the same type were caught laws regarding their pension investment. so they're already looking at that to you've got the whole issue of companies, particularly american companies stepping into the political realm. where we've obviously seen a great deal more of that in the united states. nike with colon cap or nick quarterback from the national football league who was blacklisted. you saw it in georgia with delta airlines, which is headquartered. they are regarding the voter restriction bill that was passed. but now you have a vermont company

israel's prime minister natalie bennett calling the decision morally wrong. company striking a deal worth at least $5 billion under the terms at&t will carry dish wireless systems for ten years, voice data and messaging services, brands that fall under dish are boost mobile and republic wireless. both stocks are higher on the news as you can see and in particularly dish that will benefit from this, 1 and a half percent, at&t up almost half percent. did you see this? close call. a man was waiting in the waters of panamÁ city beach, florida, then he gets this. a hammer head shark, the shark nearby starts to charge him as people are nearby screaming in terror, the man begins to back away and luckily so does the shark. okay, sharks in the water in washington. there always is. vice president kamala harris testing negative for covid-19 after meeting with texas house democrats who ended up six of them testing positive. harris met with them a week ago. they fled texas to avoid the republican backed voting legislation. well, the white house says the vice president's