eisenhower's own doctors' notes are available at the eisenhower library. and his doctor said that eisenhower had retreated to his hotel room exhausted and suffering from high blood pressure. the doctor said he was emotionally upset because of the exhaustion of these days and the prospect of requirements for days to come. so although pearson had gotten some of the details wrong in the story, he had gotten the gist of it correct. he also didn't aim his fire exclusively at presidents. he made life pretty difficult for members of congress as well. he had capitol hill riddled with people willing to overhear conversations and report back to him about that. he claimed credit for having caused the indictment, imprisonment, censure, at least a half a dozen members of congress, and the political defeats of many more of them. it might not have been so bad for members of the congress if drew pearson's column had only appeared in the "washington post." but it was singled indicated in 600 newspapers which meant constituents were getting a chance to read it. among the me

eisenhower wanted something done about castro. the cia proposed covert action to stabilize the cuban economy, with economic sabotage. eisenhower said he wanted something more drastic. historians disagree over whether eisenhower meant that cia should assassinate castro. to cia officials at the time, it seemed that eisenhower, who clearly would not use words out loud like assassinate and murder, it is still clear to the cia officials that eisenhower really wanted castro removed from the scene by whatever means necessary. just as they believe that eisenhower had expressed the desire that an african leader, patrice lumumba, be removed, killed if necessary, to prevent that congo from becoming communist. there is no smoking gun on either. on whether eisenhower really wanted them assassinated. but eisenhower was concern about castro for the same reasons he had authorized the cia to topple the elected government of guatemala. in 1954. he believed that once communism was established in the western hemisphere, it would spread by soviet supp

eisenhower wanted something done about castro. cia proposed covert action to destabilize the cuban economy with economic sabotage. eisenhower said he wanted something more drastic. now, historians disagree on whether eisenhower meant that cia should assassinate castro. to cia officials at the time, it seemed clear to them that eisenhower, who clearly would not use words out loud like assassinate and murder, is still clear to the cia officials that eisenhower really wanted castro removed from the scene by whatever means necessary. just as they believed that eisenhower had expressed the desire that an african leader be removed, killed if necessary, to prevent the congo from going communist. there's no smoking gun on either, on whether eisenhower really wanted them assassinated. now, eisenhower was concerned about castro for the same reasons he had authorized cia to topple the elected government of guatemala in 1954. he believed that once communism was established in the western hemisphere it would spread by soviet supported subversi

on whether eisenhower really wanted them assassinated. now eisenhower was concerned about castro for the same reasons. he had authorized cia to topple the elected government of guatemala in 1954. he believed that once communism was established in the western hemisphere. it would spread by soviet-supported subversion and revolution and this is what as history teaches us. this is what communist governments do did my dissertation on the revolutionary government of grenada, 1979 and 1983 and there you have the communist grenadians being helped by the communist cubans in order to spread communist revolution to other island nations in the caribbean so that example from the 80 shows that in the 1950s eisenhower was on to something he was right. this was a threat so eisenhower authorized cia to plan covert action to remove castro from power now at this point. i want to remind you of our discussions in this class about covert action as an intelligence function the purpose of us covert action is to influence political economic military conditions a

as mail president eisenhower renamed after his grandson, camp david. that is how we know it today. >> you describe kempton for a lot of our viewers and listeners who i'm sure have never visited camp david in person. i'm probably will not visit camp david. when you paint a picture of what the camp is like? >> i will try. great partners of ours 1800 feet elevation, on the spring and summer months. a leafy canopy perfectly manicured yards, the road meanders to the camp. in these cabins we presidential walk-through all the cabins have this oak plank siding with the certain shade of green paint. all the roofs are cedar shake shingles. these very rustic, very leafy, very fresh. but at night i find it particularly surreal definitely quiet, no white except pathway light. no noise except for a squirrel in the tree no lights, no noises from below eerily quiet peaceful. inside the campus is called cedar just from the corner from aspen and the president's logic. >> how many cabins are in camp david, how big is the site? >> there are about four guest cabins preside

as mail president eisenhower renamed after his grandson, camp david. that is how we know it today. >> you describe kempton for a lot of our viewers and listeners who i'm sure have never visited camp david in person. i'm probably will not visit camp david. when you paint a picture of what the camp is like? >> i will try. great partners of ours 1800 feet elevation, on the spring and summer months. a leafy canopy perfectly manicured yards, the road meanders to the camp. in these cabins we presidential walk-through all the cabins have this oak plank siding with the certain shade of green paint. all the roofs are cedar shake shingles. these very rustic, very leafy, very fresh. but at night i find it particularly surreal definitely quiet, no white except pathway light. no noise except for a squirrel in the tree no lights, no noises from below eerily quiet peaceful. inside the campus is called cedar just from the corner from aspen and the president's logic. >> how many cabins are in camp david, how big is the site? >> there are about four guest cabins preside

any other reasons why truman and eisenhower's test so they wanted european stability. that was an interest of the us economically. absolutely. they wanted europeans stability. they wanted to assist in europe's post-war economic recovery. any other reasons that you can think of? well, these are all very good answers at the end of the war. there were an estimated 10 million people left homeless and in some cases stateless just in europe alone. truman wanted to accommodate a greater share of the displaced persons in order to assist europe's post-war recovery as tests pointed out. financial aid to the war-torn nations was not enough. he said the united states had a moral obligation to accept a number of the displaced persons in europe. and yet congress resisted. even after americans became more fully aware of the horrors of the nazi death camps congress resisted. can anyone venture a guest or tell me why congress would have been so resistant at this time to accommodating displaced persons and refugees? you want to venture a guess? well bear in mind that at this moment in t

his appointed by eisenhower. and he pointed him, he suffered as a moderate summary who could get to congress and i think eisenhower used to say, only made two mistakes is present both of them are on the supreme court. and so brandon, is not exactly in the same campus eisenhower. i think a better example, is like justice appointed by president bush first and he was assured by johnson who knew him quite well. that he was a republican conservative and of course the justice proved to be more moderate and perhaps closer to the justice stevens in these issues. >> is there any justices that have had a similar

would not let eisenhower win, or cheat. and he understood that when people were in the streets, he had a fundamental responsibility to make sure he did not do anything to excite violence, to incite violence, if you will. yet he saw violence occur at tiananmen. that gave him a fundamental problem, that he knew his records could reverberate, but also a fundamental problem on response and he falls back on first principles, to say he still believed in free markets. he still believed in freedom, inexhaustible spirit of students for freedom. it had been generated by engagement with the west, would continue to move on as long as we continued to allow them to engage the west. so and others around the country and around the world called for bush to isolate china, to cut off trade, remove trade relations, bush, even though he was pilloried in the polls for doing, so argued instead that we should try to re-engage. of course, we want to condemn. but if what's really got the chinese on this democratic path was exposure to the democratic

his dad was one of eisenhower's golfing buddies, because he was the only person who would not let eisenhower win or cheat, and he understood that when people are in the streets, he had a fundamental responsibility to make sure he did not do anything to excite violence, to incite violence, if you will, and yet he saw violence occur at tiananmen, giving him a fundamental problem, which he knew his words could reverberate and a fundamental problem of his response. here he falls back on first principles, which is to say he still believed in free markets, he still believed in freedom. he still believed in inexhaustible spirit of students for freedom, which has been generated by engagement with the pest, would continue to move on so long as we continue to engage them. when other around the country and the world called for bush to remove trade relations with china, diplomatic relations with china, bush, even though he was pill rated in the polls for doing so, argued instead, we should try to reengage. of course we're going to condemn, but if what really got the chinese on the democratic path was ex

and eisenhower gives a national television address where he justifies why it's important for there to be a high tax rate, which is not like republican politics in our generation. but part of the case, he says, is that 70 cents on the dollar that you are being taxed is being spent for national security. right. so we are not just doing this to make people's lives better, but doing it to protect the nation and the public good and in which you get in the period is massive expansion of national government spending if it is then tied to national security in some front and not if it is tied to other social benefit. fulbright, the senator, actually looks into this in late 1960s, and he calculates that the federal government spent something like $904 billion on military-related expenses and $904 billion on all other expenses and so it is tied to military expenditures, and this is surprisingly going to be tied to politics. so if you want to have something funded to the government, it will help to tie it to military spending. >> but in that article, isn't it that people would not be so inquisiti

>> yes. >> to make a comment on eisenhower's warning about the military industrial complex? >> he ends by giving a warning about the military industrial complex, right, which he argues there is too much spending going into military industrial activity and they've kind of captured the public spending process. what's interesting to me most about it is the first drafts of the speech is called the military industrial congressional complex, because he has realized that actually what defense spending does is it compartmentalizes production so that every district has one part of the plane that is being made, so that there's a congressperson who is invested in voting up as pork barrel service to their constituents, and he realizes unless you break that, congress won't make real decisions in the public good. it will have too many incentives to do rfs to industry. i think he decides, i'm not sure why, calling it the military industrial congressional speech in his farewell address would be too much of a shot across the bow to his people so he drops it. it's about the intersection betwe

eisenhower. he was a west point graduate, graduated in 1915, and then four years after he graduated, in 1919, he accompanied an army con soy that went from -- convoy that went from the west coast to the east coast. and that journey took 62 days. and it appalled eisenhower. he was really, in a lot of ways, disgusted by it. he saw army vehicles getting stuck in mud. that was the condition of roads back then, really crude, primitive pathways for vehicles to travel on. and he recognized that this was a real problem. it was a problem for the economy because it hampered economic development. when you have transportation networks that are that crude, it impedes the transportation, the movement of goods and services. he also as a military man recognized that represented a threat to national security. in case of an emergency, you couldn't move military vehicles very easily along those kinds of roadways. is so i think that experience had a formative impact on him. it stuck in the back of his mind. and then

i believe he was a democrat, appointed by president eisenhower. eisenhower appointed brennan. he saw brennan as a moderate and as somebody whocould get through congress . i think eisenhower used to say that he only made two mistakes as president and both of themwere on the supreme court . so brennan was not exactly in the same camp. i think a better example would be someone like justice souter or justice souter appointed by president bush first. he was a, but was assured by johnson who knew justice souter quite well that he was a rock red republican conservative and of course he proved to be more moderate and perhaps closer to justice stevens in his views. >> is there any justice who's had a similar impact to the chief justice marshall on the nation? can you draw any other comparisons ? the question is any justice. >> i would say that certainly justice story have an enormous impact in terms of our understanding of the law today. but justice jackson i think had a great impact in terms of defining limits on presidential power and the relationship between president andcongress .

his appointed by eisenhower. and he pointed him, he suffered as a moderate summary who could get to congress and i think eisenhower used to say, only made two mistakes is present both of them are on the supreme court. and so brandon, is not exactly in the same campus eisenhower. i think a better example, is like justice appointed by president bush first and he was assured by johnson who knew him quite well. that he was a republican conservative and of course the justice proved to be more moderate and perhaps closer to the justice stevens in these issues. >> is there any justices that have had a similar impact to the chief justice marshall on the nation. can you draw any of those pretty will the question is the justice. >> yes printed i would say this certainly justice and in the normative impact in terms of standing in the law today. and just as jackson i think had a great impact in terms of defining presidential power in the relationship to the president and congress. there's a lot of justices come to mind. and

susan eisenhower, author and granddaughter of dwight d. eisenhower, moderated the discussion. >> let me just say that it is really a thrill to talk on again, and as i had some experience as a child with what it is like to be in the company of people who wield enormous power, to observe the, both the pressures of the job along with the loneliness, you might say, of power, and obviously, it comes with privilege but also great sacrifice. lynne, you have said over time that you have carved out a remarkable career for yourself. this proximity to power probably started for you when your husband dick cheney became chief of staff to gerald ford. >> and i didn't see him for two years. >> is that right? >> that's sort of the way it is. but i was so interested in what he was doing that he learned to come home at night and tell me what he had done all day. so that's a really fascinating inside look. you and i were joking before. if you're the president of the united states, you're called potus. if you are the first lady of the united states, you are c

. >> eisenhower: good morning, ladies and gentlemen... >> whitaker: more than 60 years ago, darpa was born, after president eisenhower was caught off-guard when russia launched the first satellite, "sputnik," into orbit. >> reporter: i ask you, sir, what are we going to do about it? >> whitaker: the small defense department agency was given a single purpose: prevent surprises like that from ever happening again. so dr. hepburn finds academics, companies, inventors working in garages, and pushes them to deliver. >> hepburn: what we don't do-- we don't say, "okay, here's our problem. here's your blank check. come back to us in three to five years, we'll see how you do." >> whitaker: you're on them? >> hepburn: "active program management" is what we call it. okay? ( laughs ) >> whitaker: dr. hepburn showed us a few current projects. some sound like they're from an episode of "star trek." consider a ship like the u.s.s. "theodore roosevelt," hobbled last year when 1,271 crew members tested positive for the coronavirus. what if everyone on board had their health monitored with this subderm

and it appalled eisenhower. he was really in a lot of ways disgusted by it. he saw army vehicles getting stuck in mud. that was the condition of roads back then. really crude, primitive pathways for vehicles to travel on. and he recognized that this was a real problem. it was problem for the economy because it hampered economic development. when you have transportation networks that are that crude, it impedes the transportation, the movement of goods and services. he also is a military man, recognized that representative threat to national security. i mean, in case of an emergency you couldn't move military vehicles very easily along those kinds of roadways. so i think that experience had a formative impact on him. it stuck in the back of his mind. and then, during world war ii, he was in europe. and in germany, he saw the autobahn, the network of roads, the freeways in germany, along which vehicles traveled very fast and he was very impressed by that. i think those two experiences combined led him to be a big advocate of better roads in the u.s. he set up th

of the communist, if not eisenhower people high in the white house and the truman administration. traffics in the birth and death of whole world, whole political orders, systems of human values and manning the barricades of civilization and constantly lives in turning point, he expresses anxiety of those who are living through last days and sometimes disposed to set a date for the apocalypse. he's writing about political thinkers but as religious historian in particular this language really speaks out to me in the language of apocalyptic vision and when you hear people talk in american politics, they talk about a war of civilization, everything will be over and we don't have this, a border wall or something else, everything will be gone, we will be overridden, this kind of language of this is the election that if this election doesn't happen, it's all over because of some dark conspiracy, okay. we go back to our history. 1776, founded by adam, probably not real name as it translates as adam wise head. so the illuminaty is a real thing, a real organization set up that in 1775 calle

he had been vice president under eisenhower and ran against jfk. he lost a close election because the eisenhower demonstration decided to control inflation as opposed to stimulating the economy and creating more jobs. nixon as president was extremely clear to his advisers that he would allow inflation to flare that meant increasing employment. he was very clear about that. now in the other circumstances you may have had the head of the central bank has said well if you are going to do that i'm going to tighten interest rates quite dramatically. but his bid chairman was arthur burns, very complex person. burns was above all he wanted nixon's admiration. i go into this a lot to cause personality plays a major role in knowledge these decisions and burns simply wanted to be in nixon's good graces but he also was a distinguished economist and he knew something about inflation and he came to the conclusion that neither physical nor monetary policy was the right policy and in fact inflation was caused by labor unions which were negotiating ever higher wag

and then with the guns, and eisenhower never thought this was a plausible idea, and he was shocked that anybody could be that mistaken in what a strategic leader would do to perhaps put american troops 4 500 miles behind enemy lines. and eisenhower liked to play golf, and he probably didn't know that people behind him were not to excite violence. and yet, he saw violence at tiananmen, and giving him the fundamental problem of words to reverberate. and here he falls back on the first principles which says that he still believed in free market, and he still believed in freedom, and he still believed in the inexhaustible for freedom generated with i ability to move along in the west. so when others call for bush to isolate china, and remove the trade relations with china, and diplomatic trade with china, and even though bush was ob live yatliterated in the polls for doing so. but what we had was exposure to the political virus. he writes letters behind the scenes and envoys to the chinese with the following message, we condemn everything that you did, but we have to start talking at some p

tell that story of how close a call it was because even then people didn't want eisenhower to try to enforce this decision. >> it was a great decision of president eisenhower, that he would send a thousand paratroopers, 101st airborne from ft. bragg to take those children in the school. but they couldn't stay forever, and when they left, the authorities in little rock tried to end integration and go back to segregation, and the supreme court said no. all nine justices said you must integrate. now, well, those are nine people. those are nine people. there could have been 900 judges, and there were a lot of people in the south who didn't want to. so what i think happened is that was the era of martin luther king. that was the era of the freedom riders. that was the era when the north, the entire country woke up -- woke up to the injustice of segregation, and they wouldn't have gotten anywhere, the judges, if it had not been for all of the people who aren't judges to begin to decide to bring justice to the south. no more legal segregation. and i told that story to a woman who is the pre

the reason for this is because the eisenhower administration had not given them the go ahead to launch a satellite. you can imagine how frustrated they were less than a month later when the soviet union launches sputnik on october 4, 1957. in fact, the women i talked to are still angry about this. it's very frustrating. because they know given the opportunity they could have launched before them. it actually isn't until a second sputnik is launched that eisenhower finally gives the group the go ahead. so on december 31, 1958, the group at jpl assembles to launch explorer 1. now, there are many women who are part of this launch, but none is more important than a woman named barbara paulson. on this evening she is the one responsible for calculating the trajectory of the satellite as it leaves earth. to do this, she is sitting at a light table with paper and pencil. remember, she's doing this all by hand. standing over her shoulder are richard fineman, the famous physicist, and lee dubridge, who is then president of cal tech, and everyone in the room is waiting on her calculations to fin

the reason for this is because the eisenhower administration had not given them the go ahead to launch a satellite. and so you can imagine, how frustrating they were, less than a month later, when the soviet union launches sputnik on october 4th, 1957. the women i talk to are still angry about this. it's very frustrating. because they know, given the opportunity, they could have launched before them. and it actually isn't until a second sputnik's launch that eisenhower finally gives the group to go ahead. and so on december 31st, 1958, the group that jpl assembles to launch explorer one. there are many women who are part of this launch. but none is more important than barbara paulson. on this evening she is responsible for targeting the satellite trajectory. to do this, she is sitting at a light table with paper and pencil. remember, she is doing this all by hand and standing over her are richard fineman and lee, president of caltech. and everyone in the room is waiting on her calculations to find out if the mission will be a success. and she calculates that, yes, explore one has made

there were three recessions during the eisenhower years and the unemployment rate increased up to 7%. so i will just read you a couple of excerpts from this book and i hope that you get a flavor for what we are talking about. fortunately, we have a model for -- to follow as we seek to return our with nation to economic. growth it is the kennedy reagan. model one into areas of economic policy, fiscal and monetary policy. both kennedy and reagan identified substantially cutting in context rates and getting the dollar strong and stable as the specific policy that will lead the private sector, which is to say the real economy, thrive. we need that. we need that. most of us are well aware that reagan was a tax cut or. we he's the guy who had to deal with the high tax inflation. which came to end in the first years of his presidency. some of us are even aware that bill clinton used some of that model to foster prosperity in the decade after ronald reagan with the republican congress, clinton cut capital gains tax rates and was a proponent of free trade, which we think is part of the mix. ho

i mean, this is -- biden came in -- biden, i think, wanted to be eisenhower. he wanted to be a kind of elder statesman who was largely above politics, who was bringing the parties together. and, you know, kind of tamping down the cultural and social conflict, and focusing on kitchen-table issues, shots in the arms, checks in the pocket. what he has found at this moment of intense polarization, when so many red states are careening so far to the right on so many issues, on masks, on abortion, on voting rights, that posture is simply untenable that if you try to be kind of above the fray, you end up not being eisenhower but james buchanan who was the president before lincoln who kind of blundered into the civil war. ultimately, he i think has recognized if he is going to achieve what he is setting out to do and what the majority of the country supports, he is going to have to confront, more directly, those forces in red america that are -- that are opposing it. whether it's the unvaccinated through mandates. or whether it's the governors that he is, you know, go

there were three recessions in the eisenhower years. the unemployment rate was gradually increasing up to 7%. so i will read you a couple of excerpts from this book and i hope you get a flavor of it. fortunately we have a model to follow as we seek the return our nation to economic growth. it is the john f. kennedy-ronald reagan model. if the model of getting the government restrained and mod nest its two areas of economic policy, fiscal monetary policy. both identified substantially cutting income tax rates and getting the dollar strong and stable as the specific policy that would let the private sector, which is to stay real economy, thrive. we need that. we need that. most us are well aware that reagan was a tax cutter. he is the guy who had to dwoo he will the horrible stagflation of the '70s and '80s which came to an end in the first years of his presidency. some of us are aware that bill clinton used some of that model to foster prosperity in the decade after ronald reagan with a republican congress, clinton cut capital gains tax

tell that story of how close a call it was because even then people didn't want eisenhower to try to enforce this decision. >> it was a great decision of president eisenhower that he would send a thousand paratroopers, 101st airborne from ft. bragg to take those children in the school. but they couldn't stay forever, and when they left, the authorities in little rock tried to end integration and go back to segregation and the supreme court said no, all nine justices said you must integrate. now, well, those are nine people. those are nine people. there could have been 900 judges, and there were a lot of people in the south who didn't want to. so what i think happened is that was the era of martin luther king. that was the era of the freedom riders. that was the era where the north, the entire country woke up -- woke up to the injustice of segregation, and they wouldn't have gotten anywhere, the judges, if it had not been for all of the people who aren't judges to begin to decide to bring justice to the south. no more legal segregation. and i told that story to a woman who is the pres

if not eisenhower, then certainly people high up in the white house in the truman administration. he traffics in the birth and death of whole worlds, whole political orders, whole systems of human values. he's also manning the barricades of civilization. he constantly lives at a turning point. he expresses the anxiety of those who are living through the last days and need sometimes to set a date for the apocalypse. so he's writing about political think terse, but as a religious historian in particular, this language really speaks out to me, an apocalyptic vision. and also when you hear people talk in american politics, they talk about civilization, everything will be over if we don't have this, a border wall or something else, everything will be gone, will be overridden, that this kind of language that this is the election that if it doesn't happen, it's all over because of some dark conspiracy, okay? the illuminati, we go back into our history, the illumined ones established in bavaria in 1776 founded by adam -- probably not a real name as it translate toss adam whitehead. so the

>> look, as you were discussing in the last segment, biden came in -- biden i think wanted to be eisenhower. he wanted to be an elder statesman largely above politics bringing the parties together and kind of tamping down the cultural and social conflict and focussing on kitchen table issues, shots in the arms, checks in the pocket, shovels in the ground. what he found is this moment of intense polarization when so many red states are kareeming so far to the right on so many issues on masks, on abortion, on voting rights, that that posture is simply untenable if you try to be above the fray, you end up not being eisenhower but james buchanan who is the president before lincoln who kind of blundered into the civil war. ultimately, he, i think, recognized that if he's going to achieve what he is setting out to do and which majority of the country supports, he is going to have to confront more directly those forces in red america that are opposing it, whether the unvaccinated through mandates or whether it's the governors that he is going after on a variety of fronts from education department

we didn't tell eisenhower. >> he didn't do it. that's the difference. both lbj and fdr did this in pieces, and they had bigger majorities. >> they had much bigger majorities. this is realpolitik. you know what it looks like for the next congress to move this big. people elected the president of the united states to do bold, big things that will change america. this is our moment, we should seize it. >> during the presidential primaries, which you with part of, didn't the democratic voters essentially send the message, do what's possible, they didn't pick the progressive candidates? >> they picked a moderate guy who has a great track record for getting things done in the senate. that's why joe biden was joking with us in the white house. this isn't a progressive wish list. when you poll the parts with republicans, what he's doing is wildly popular are republican americans who want affordable college and day care. they want to make sure we're meeting the challenge of climate change. to characterize this as some -- remember, bernie sanders' first wish list

and so brandon, is not exactly in the same campus eisenhower. i think a better example, is like justice appointed by president bush first and he was assured by johnson who knew him quite well. that he was a republican conservative and of course the justice proved to be more moderate and perhaps closer to the justice stevens in these issues. >> is there any justices that have had a similar impact to the chief justice marshall on the nation. can you draw any of those pretty will the question is the justice. >> yes printed i would say this certainly justice and in the normative impact in terms of standing in the law today. and just as jackson i think had a great impact in terms of defining presidential power in the relationship to the president and congress. there's a lot of justices come to mind. and the justice brandeis so far was certainly, transformed a lot of our thinking about the law in terms of he practiced law in the way he introduced social science to the law. >> next question we have is well with the justice marshall have thought either

. >> general eisenhower. >> reporter: ...glorious victory, and vandalism during street protests in 2018. when the french president emmanuel macron visited the project, he said, "this is what we believe in-- crazy dreams must come true." holly williams, cbs news, paris. >> barnett: and that is a triumphant wrap for the "cbs weekend news" this saturday. i'm errol barnett in chicago. good night. captioning sponsored by cbs captioned by media access group at wgbh access.wgbh.or >>> this is kpix5 news. >>> keeping an eye on high def doppler. the light showers have arrived in the north bay. what this means for your part of the bay area rain wise, coming up. >>> in san francisco. inside one of the new vaccine clinics at the schools. >> the subject of picking up, well things are picking up. a big effort to clean up the bay. a >> and it is not usually where we see illegal sideshows. the stunts that woke up neighbors in the wee hours of the morning. thanks for joining us. i'm juliette goodrich. >> and in the past 60 minutes an earthquake shook up a remote area, as remote as things get out there.