if anyone in china wants to split any part of china against china or from china, he or she becomes our public enemy. >> xi and his loyalists often respond with what aboutism. they argue, what about american human rights abuses. >> if any country has practiced genocide, it is not china. enslavery of negro americans for example, for hundreds of years, that's the real crime against humanity. >> china's abuses are mostly hidden from western eyes. >> why you are here? >> we are here to believe what -- we are here to film what we believe are camps of uyghurs. >> xi's -- is part of a larger campaign to snuff out separatist threats everywhere. from xinjiang to tibet to hong kong. it's one of the final pieces of china's revolution under xi jinping. >> for years, china had had an almost apologetic approach to its human rights abuses. xi jinping said, that's no longer how we are going to talk about it. we are not going to apologize. they were just going do it. >> for all the criticism from the west, it's important to understand that in china, which is more than 90% hahn chinese, there is not much

there is only one china, taiwan is part of china. this is acknowledged by the united nations by almost all the countries in the world, including all that you members states, including the united states, including all it's 5 i members, state your name it japan. acknowledge that this is the corner stone of china's foreign relations with all the countries in the world. with all the united nations, not the united states, cannot have the cake, i eat it back in 1979, the united states did the right thing. they sever the relations with taiwan. they cancel the defense treaty between the united states and taiwan. they withdrew all the u. s. troops, station leading taiwan. now if they want to really reverse that, be my guest, but the consequences will be there will be no more to provide the relations between china and the united states and the real legal status between channels. mainland anti one is the our finished a civil war. why taiwan ended up with his current situation. first of all, it's because of the cairo declaration pottstown declar

china was quite different. link -- english language state media highlighted xi jinping's calls for respect and cooperation. >> beijing has described the meeting as fruitful and constructive and says it opened doors to future communication. chinese state media said it was reassuring to the international community that these two superpowers were trying to manage their differences. xi jinping went into this meeting wanting to appear strong, wanting to defend china 's interests. he did that in two areas. in trade, he said he wanted to fast-track economic exchanges between the countries and warned joe biden against using security issues this oppressed companies. the second topic was in regards to taiwan, arguably the most important topic for beijing. xi jinping warned president biden that any kind of talk of taiwan independence would be playing with fire and that in turn, they promised to abide by the one china principle. if you contrast the earlier meeting we had in alaska between the two sides, a meeting for love

there is only one china, taiwan is part of china. this is acknowledged by the united nations by almost all the countries in the world, including all that you members states, including the united states, including all it's 5. i members, states your name it japan. acknowledge that this is the corner stone of china's foreign relations with all the countries in the world with all the united nations. now, the united states cannot have the cake, i eat it back in 1979, the united states did the right thing. they sever the relations with taiwan. they cancel the defense treaty between the united states and taiwan. they withdrew all the u. s. troops, station leading taiwan. now if they want to really reverse that, be my guest, but the consequences will be there will be no more to provide the relations between china and the united states and the real legal status between channels. mainland anti one is the our finished a civil war. why taiwan ended up with his current situation. first of all, it's because of the cairo declaration pottstown decla

the china of 2021 is not the china of 1971 or even the china of 2011. china today is challenging the united states and destabilizing the international community across every dimension of power. political, diplomatic, economic military and cultural. i truly believe that china today led by the communist party and from pedal by xi jinping's hypernationalism is unlike any challenge we've faced as a nation before. from its predatory economic behavior and aggressive efforts to coerce neighbors in the maritime domain. ive to the crushing and religious autonomy of tibet and campaign of genocide against the uyghur people and digital authoritarianism. china today is more emboldened thavren before. there should be little doubt that the right framework for thinking about our relationship with china today is strategic competition. not because that is necessarily what we want. but because of the choices beijing is making. therefore if confirmed you will need to be cleared eyed about beijing's intentions and actions and play a key role in calibrating this administrati

however, the china is not the china local chains and now it's more of a direct competitor to united states. so there's more of a need, therefore, to renegotiate economic partnership as well. to also accommodate on the what format they can actually compete. level are going to leave right there because unfortunately time has come up against us. but i want to thank all i guess, victor gao, hydro clean kind. glenn decent. thank you. to course for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website. i'll just here at dot com for further discussion, go to our facebook page that facebook dot com forward slash a j inside story. you can also join the conversation on twitter. we are at a g inside story for me, robots, and our whole team here by the this is al jazeera, it's november the 15th day, one of the new era and television news. if you have known that, that was the scale of bloodshed would you have still gone to moments ago to miss all landed about a 100 meters away from us. we're on the front line, but it's on we're being all that is it on is very, really, it is coming ou

and china. coming up next, pimco's analyst joins us to talk about the outcome and the outlook for the market. this is bloomberg. - ♪ >> if china is considered un-investable, then chances are whatever risk you are thinking about bearing in china, you would be ok to take it. china has not had a recession since the mouth -- the mouth -- the mao era, which ended in 1978. these things have not been tested, but we are optimistic. >> speaking there on the opportunities in china. let's bring in the coo of global credit at pimco. it feels like investors are starting to see the pockets of opportunity as being worth the risk. how do you feel about credit in china at the moment? >> we definitely have exposure in china, and it is more of a long-term view that china's economy is going to grow relatively fast over the next 10 years, particularly relative to developed markets. if you look at the consumer, the percent of the overall economy, it still has a lot of upside. those consumers will want to take more

and the world found itself with 2 chinas. at 1st tie, one was seen as the real china. but that changed in the seventy's when the u. s. and the u. n recognized beijing as the official china and taiwan republic of china became what we have to day, a largely unrecognized don state. ah, the taiwanese means different things to different people. bid the divide between those who say taiwan is the republic of china, which is the status quo. and others who say taiwan is just well, taiwan. ah, don't judea is in the republic of china camp. this is common for families like his who arrived from china after the civil war 70 years ago. it's willoughby, does it with the bill or for doing home health aide? i mean for life high. no, i'm a high school. usually. they give me, if the way to the only thing i felt either how i got hired to run through me sir, or mental judges. mingo ne daquan ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! don't jersey lives with his wife 2 kids and his elderly father. about tyler? oh oh oh, i mean, oh oh, oh b, along grandpa was a came t soldier who fought

and china. it did not break new ground, except perhaps on china's commitment to reducing methane emissions, but a lot of people, easier knowing they could come together for a joint communiquÉ. taylor: in the past, we looked at it as u.s. versus china, and this represents a shift of u.s. and its allies pressuring china to play fair, to play by the fare rules. is that going to work better where you need the west pressuring china because the u.s. can't do it on its own? >> that is something we will see in the framework from the biden administration in which national security, a framework for asia that will work closely with allies, but again, there have been warnings from president xi about the rest of the world circling the wagons against china, and the extent to which the u.s. can cores its allies on a key issue to keep china out of the technology supply chain is certainly somewhat weak. other countries don't see china the same way completely, even though they oppose what they see as chinese bul

we are not in china. rep. castro: this is not necessarily have to be something that in flames tensions towards china. there is already in the united states, and in the congress -- [no audio] -- also have to define when they cheat. this could be a way to a greater understanding of their perspective. there are challenges that americans and congress face. i do not believe we have clearly defined what it is we should compete with china when they are competing with the united states and other nations. when they are cheating and when -- and what we need to call them out and finally when we ought to cooperate on certain issues like climate change or security in different regions of the world. jonathan: this is no small feat getting bipartisan legislation related to this center. it was introduced alongside republicans like gallagher. both of you have spent time talking about china and the challenges it represents. what you talk about it it different ways. you have characterized a challenge in different ways. you said

and the world found itself with 2 chinas. at 1st, taiwan was seen as the real china. but that changed in the seventy's when the u. s . and the u. n. recognized beijing as the official china, anti ones republic of china became what we have to day. a largely unrecognized non state ah, the taiwanese means different things to different people. there's a divide between those who say ty, one is the republic of china, which is the status quo, and others who say taiwan is just well, taiwan. ah don't judea is in the republic of china camp. this is common for families like he is who arrived from china after the civil war 70 years ago. it's willoughby does it with the hill or 14 vaughn hope aid the man for life high? no, i'm a high school usually. the good luck with the way through the all morning. both felt either how i got hired to run through me, sir, or metals out to see me and go me ha, ha ha ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha ha, i don't. ginger lives with his wife 2 kids and his elderly father about diana. oh oh oh, i mean, oh oh oh, being wrong, grandpa was a came t soldier

there is only one china, taiwan is part of china. this is acknowledged by the united nations by almost all the countries in the world, including all the u. member states, including the united states, including all it's 5 i member state your name it japan. acknowledge that this is the corner stone of china's foreign relations with all the countries in the world with all the united nations. now, the united states cannot have the cake, i eat it back in 1979, the united states did the right thing. they sever the relations with taiwan. they cancel the defense treaty between the united states and taiwan. they withdrew all the u. s. troops, station leaving taiwan. now if they want to really reverse that, be my guest, but the consequences will be there will be no more to grow by the relations, but each other and the united states and the real legal status between channels. mainland anti one is the, our finished a civil war. why taiwan ended up with his current situation. first of all, it's because of the cairo declaration pottstown declarati

[inaudible] some is a justified and the response to what china did, so you know china did fail to refuse to cooperate. it became much more assertive and cracked down on hong kong and so even though trump sort of changed because he felt politically of frontage, china was giving many reasons for the community to respond in that way and i think by the time biden came in for president biden i don't think it was obvious, but he was going to pursue a very tough on china policy, but i think when he came in the situation was such h that it was what he was presented with, that he had chinese activity in a range of areas that he felt was unjustified and he needed to push back. now, the big question is how do we get to that equilibrium where you can compete responsibly and you also have some coronation you know some boundaries on the competition and that's the big challenge i think they and china have two figure out how to get to that point. we are not there yet. it could take some time. >> i mean, i do want to ask us china questions and maybe the view as i said earlier they can post questions , bu

and china. i think in china's case we might come to this in a second, it actually reversed 17 years or so of reforms on global public health where it was being more cooperative, relatively more transparent for the most part with some bumps throughout that period, and what 2020s did was bring it to a halt and reverse it. i think it is a separate dynamic and not just a continuation of what we had previously. >> i get to the subtitle but just on the u.s.-china stuff, china's lack of cooperation with the w.h.o., trump's got a very salty, not sure what the rules are on the commonwealth -- >> in the audience, probably the -- >> trump says something very spicy about what campaign has done to him, to them personally. but talk to us a little bit about what you discovered in terms of the w.h.o. politics. >> in trump's case the shock to him of having to shut down the economy really cost him to turn reinventions on xi jinping and doors those in his administration wanted a more comprehensive continued approa

and the world found itself with 2 chinas. at 1st, taiwan was seen as the real china. but that changed in the seventy's when the u. s . and the u. n. recognized beijing as the official, china and ty, ones, republic of china became what we have to day, a largely unrecognized non state. ah, the taiwanese means different things to different people. did the divide between those who say ty, one is the republic of china, which is the status quo, and others who say taiwan is just well, taiwan? ah, don't you, dear, is in the republic of china camp. this is common for families like he is who arrived from china after the civil war 70 years ago. it's willoughby, does this bill or forging foam? obeyed the man for life high? no, i'm a hyphen usually bigger for me is the way to the only thing i felt either how i got hired to run to meet with her or mental judges. man go me. yeah, ha, ha ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha ha. dungeons ear lives with his wife, 2 kids and his elderly father. about tyler? oh, oh oh, i mean, oh oh oh, being wrong, granpa was a came t soldier who fought a

china and the u.s. thou to work together to cool down the planet in a surprise joint statement injecting fresh momentum into the last days of cap 26. and elon musk cells additional tesla shares. he's now collected more than $5 billion in just days. welcome back to london, dani burger. let's get to some of the breaking news we have coming across the bloomberg terminal. some results from merck, third quarter net adjusted sales 4.90 7 billion euros. they are talking about adjusted earnings-per-share of 2.4 euros. dani: i am back, ready for the break. the industrial giants, for them may be a little bit more positive than it was. a slight rise from 2022 margins after profit beat. seeing revenue growth at 5%-8% for next year. something analysts had expected and that definitely played through, the group was able to cope well with pressures coming from the supply chain shortages. that means their net income of 6.7 billion euros for the financial year that ended september 30, that means -- beats the consensus of

can we really say, given the tight control of media in china?— media in china? that is an interesting _ media in china? that is an interesting question. - media in china? that is an interesting question. i - media in china? that is an l interesting question. i think overall, if you look at some of the achievements that will surely be highlighted in the party under his rule, the elimination and the eradication of poverty, i think is live support for that and i think there's a lot of pride in china for having watched its unremarkable growth from a royal economy to a global superpower in a matter of decades in the party rightfully takes credit for that. at the same time, we are seeing in the state of regulatory policy announcements of the last few months that china is shaping the society and economy that it wants in this new era and the growth at all costs mentality and the get rich faces over and policies would not be guided by principles of social fairness and national security. both of those are welcomed and in the prosperity campaign that you alluded and also t

with china, did you bring up some of- china, did you bring up some of those _ china, did you bring up some of those very— china, did you bring up some of those very contentious - china, did you bring up some of those very contentious issues . china, did you bring up some of. those very contentious issues such as the _ those very contentious issues such as the use — those very contentious issues such as the use of— those very contentious issues such as the use of forced _ those very contentious issues such as the use of forced labour- those very contentious issues such as the use of forced labour for- as the use of forced labour for building — as the use of forced labour for building solar— as the use of forced labour for building solar panels? - as the use of forced labour for building solar panels? how. as the use of forced labour for| building solar panels? how did as the use of forced labour for- building solar panels? how did you address— building solar panels? how did you address it — building solar panels? how did you address it and _ building solar panels? how did

however, to see a china, it is not the china needs to climb the local chains and now it's more of a direct competitor to united states. so there's more of a need, therefore, to renegotiate economic partnership as well. to also accommodate on the one format they can actually come, deep level are going to leave right there because unfortunately time has come up against us. but i want to thank all i guess, victor gao, hydro clean and glen decent. thank you to course for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website. i'll just here at dot com for further discussion. go to our facebook page that facebook dot com forward slash a j inside story. you can also join the conversation on twitter. we are at a g inside story for me, robotics and i hope to hear you bye. for now. the ah and a november 21st venezuelans head for the poles, teaches the regional and municipal representatives. after 4 years of election boycott can proposition party effect change at the ballot box and will this be a step towards progress for the rising number of those living in extreme poverty? the ve

xi jinping has not left in china -- left china in more than 600 days. whether they use facetime or skype or zoom or whatever, i am sure they have their own channels, but the biden administration, at lease the president has wanted to lift this up to face to face between the president.because lower level talks so far have not borne fruit. in that anchorage face-to-face meeting there was more acrimony than agreement. there is an area of grievances of course. to this date, the biden administration has not wound back the tariffs and some of the trade war measures from the trump administration. giving themselves some wiggle room as far as leverage. do not always want to pull it back right from the start in the first year. so i am sure that will be on the table. some of the other financial and trade issues with yellen joining the call. but there is momentum right now. there was a joint statement coming out of cop on climate change that they can build upon. there is also the putting to rest to huawei episode, with her being released from her extradition process

and china to a military conflict. find it and xi jinping asked biden and xi jinping have spoken on the phone twice this year. this is the first time the conversation is being billed as a summit. senate majority leader chuck schumer could be set to fast-track a bill aimed at competing with china by attaching it to a must pass defense bill this week. the bill would boost domestic semiconductor manufacturing with $62 billion and authorize another $190 billion to research and development. the china bill passed the senate in june but is being held up in the house. china launches the beijing stock exchange intended as a platform for small and medium-sized companies that face difficulties raising capital. about 70 companies will migrate from the existing chinese fours and an additional 10 will debut for the first time. global news on air and on bloombergquint take is powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in or than 120 countries. i am su keenan and this is bloomberg. >> more ambitious and somewhat expected. last

as influence, and now that influence is being undermined by china and china's way of life. it's very interesting because obviously there's a lot of pressure from the business community to keep exactly what you just said going where we can export our culture to china. but obviously there have been some concerns in recent years over that now. bad is expected that in the discussion will also surround the issue of climate change. what would the, by the ministration be asking for from china in that regard? well here's, here's part of the problem with big questions about climate change, right? is that yes, essentially with the white house, the signaling in advance of it is that look, they're going to impress upon china that this isn't really something that they're asking as a bargaining chip. this is in china's best interests. but here's here, the fact they're trying to doesn't care about climate change right now. they care about energy. they care about cheap energy for their people. and so china is rapidly, as you guys know, building a large numbers of coal powered plants and ge

china does so against particular interpretation of history. china is ambitious. china is aggrieved. and it is trying to increase its influence, especially in its neighborhood, in the south china sea and the taiwan straits. the united states, for its part, is worried about its relative decline, influence, and relative wealth. the two countries have truly begun clashing in the western pacific. they have interests that are clashing. i'm afraid that for the long-term this is going to be a worldwide competition in the security, economic, technological, and international law and ideology spheres. this is going to be with us for a long time. host: where do our interests class? guest: our interests clash in the western pacific, where the united states, she has not signed the u.n. convention on the law of the sea, never act in accordance with it. do not see this enormous area as china's leg. we see it as part of the global commons through which all countries should be able to sail or fly, in accordance with international law. whereas china increasingly is trying to assert its dominance in th

this is what china doesn't want, china wants to be seen as a global player. when the globalized world says you are not, the chinese government communist party will be very upset and hopefully causes them to change their behavior when they are not part of it. kennedy: i would hold my breath but i would die. alexandra -- >> i agree with the boycott but let's face it, it's a bare minimum of what they could do and be easy thing to do because it very visual, they sort of get the accolades the community for doing so but it's really not that tough. what would be tough is holding china accountable for their role in the covid pandemic . kennedy: that's what i would like to read out president biden's on covid, would you do that to the rest of the world from a killed hundreds of thousands of americans, you are a bunch of jerks. it will probably happen in china again in 12 years because ioc is a bunch of weenies. you are all wonderful great americans might adore everyone of you. alex, richard and brad, well done. well done. coming up, closer to finally federally decrimin

and china. in china's case, we might come to this in a second, it reversed 17 years or so on global public health where it was more cooperative,e, relatively more transparent for the most part with some bumps and 2020 brought that to a halt and reverse it so i think it. is a separate dynamc is not just a continuation of what we had previously. >> in a second i'll get to the subtitle, and of the old international order but on the u.s. china, fascinating material about china's corporation with the who, i'm not sure the language was. >> the audience evidence quote. >> he said something about what xi jinping has done to him personally but talk about what you discovered in terms of who politics. >> entrance case, the shock to him of having tohe shut down the economy in turn with a vengeance and xi jinping in the administration wanted a more comprehensive continued approach but after who questioned, this is fascinating, the who finds out they have this global crisis in the dictator in china, they beli

in china, there is a process in china. if you allege someone did something to you, you can do this in multiple ways. posting ah, are writing other internet is one of the many ways. and each way of dealing with this will trigger different consequences. i'm so happy that we all know that punch, right, as a household naming chimeras is highly liked, and she is highly respected. she is no, not only in china, she is know everywhere. and i'm pretty sure once i will continue to be very famous, very well liked and very well respected throughout the world. this is what matters the most. and i hope events like this will not be a highly publicized or politicized, because that's not the most constructive way to deal with such highly personal matters to start with. and privacy need to be respected and privacy is what matters when you have, you know, very, very personal things emotional things like this. so i'm just going to share this with him later. this is from one of our viewers have been following the story on my laptop at vincent

as influence, and now that influences being undermined by china and china's way of life. it's very interesting because obviously there's a lot of pressure from the business community to keep exactly what you just said going where we can export our culture to china. but obviously there have been some concerns in recent years over that now been expected that in the discussion will also surround the issue of climate change. what would the by the ministration be asking for from china in that regard? well here's, here's part of the problem with the questions about climate change, right. is that yes, essentially what the white house, the signaling in advance of it is that look, they're going to impress upon china that this isn't really something that they're asking as a bargaining chip. this is in china's best interest. but here's here, the factor trying to doesn't care about climate change right now. they care about energy care about cheap energy for their people. and so china is rapidly, as you guys know, building a large numbers of coal powered plants and getting them online

china does so against particular interpretation of history. china is ambitious. china is aggrieved. and it is trying to increase its influence, especially in its neighborhood, in the south china sea and the taiwan straits. the united states, for its part, is worried about its relative decline, influence, and relative wealth. the two countries have truly begun clashing in the western pacific. they have interests that are clashing. i'm afraid that for the long-term this is going to be a worldwide competition in the security, economic, technological, and international law and ideology spheres. this is going to be with us for a long time. host: where do our interests class? guest: our interests clash in the western pacific, where the united states, she has not signed the u.n. convention on the law of the sea, never act in accordance with it. do not see this enormous area as china's leg. we see it as part of the global commons through which all countries should be able to sail or fly, in accordance with international law. whereas china increasingly is trying to assert its dominance in th

into china. the world needs china, china needs the world and we have henry kissinger talking about improvement, and optimism about the relationship. so it does seem that there's a continuing -- tinge of positive moving between china and relations with the world. mark: you're right, the narrative at the moment is definitely continuinged more -- tinged more positively. and the xi-biden summit or virtual summit where there was a positive takeaway. not a massive one. and they'll need to distinguish between the fact that it was definitely positive. jut very incrementally so. the fact that they met at all and as you say that's encouraged or furthered by some of the sounds we're hearing of the new economy forum here. we're hearing some generally very positive statements. but i wouldn't want to run too far. and i'm thankful you didn't ask me to explain that bit and crypto because i can never explain that asset class. dani: i don't know if anyone really can or we're taking a stab in the dark. really inter

us and china, and that was a very nice - china, and that was a very nice surprise. — china, and that was a very nice surprise. but _ china, and that was a very nice surprise, but we _ china, and that was a very nice surprise, but we need - china, and that was a very nice surprise, but we need to - china, and that was a very nice i surprise, but we need to remain lucid _ surprise, but we need to remain lucid and — surprise, but we need to remain lucid and i_ surprise, but we need to remain lucid. and i think— surprise, but we need to remain lucid. and i think the _ surprise, but we need to remain lucid. and i think the architectsl surprise, but we need to remain i lucid. and i think the architects of the paris — lucid. and i think the architects of the paris agreement _ lucid. and i think the architects of the paris agreement is _ lucid. and i think the architects of the paris agreement is about - the paris agreement is about lucidity~ _ the paris agreement is about lucidity. basically, _ the paris agreement is about lucidity. basically, new- the paris agreement is about lucidit

that means there's one china. taiwan and china. not china turns it one way. other countries interpret it another way. we maintained the illusion of one china. so this is a pretty big deal. i think it's dangerous because the more we push on taiwan to china, the more we risk a con in grags in the taiwan straits. >> there may have been semantic differences there in the president biden, what he's said, for example, at a town hall versus for example the summit he had with the leader of china last week. senior administration officials says biden was clearly reaffirming the one china policy. but ambassador, it's interesting. so china is threatened or upset by the united states' democracy inviting taiwan, a democracy, to a meeting about democracy. what's the threat for china? >> well, china sees taiwan not as a separate country. and china sees taiwan as an island over there that is democratic, but from china's perspective is chinese. and that's the main reason why china feels taiwan should not be invited separately to this summit. >> right. it's kind of like what it

as influence and now that influences being undermined by china and china's way of life . it's very interesting because obviously there's a lot of pressure from the business community to keep exactly what you just said going where we can export our culture to china. but obviously there have been some concerns in recent years over that now bed is expected. the discussion will also surround the issue of climate change. what would the, by the ministration be asking for from china in that regard? well, here's, here's part of the problem with the questions about climate change, right? is that yes, essentially with the white house, the signaling in advance of it is that look, they're going to impress upon china that this isn't really something that they're asking as a bargaining chip. this is in china's best interests. but here's here, the factor, china doesn't care about climate change right now. they care about energy. they care about cheap energy for their people. and so china is rapidly, as you guys know, building a large numbers of coal powered plants and getting them onlin

so if you want to the fuel situation, just the found china, if we will stick by the one china policy. and this is where the implicitly comes in, because it's a button that he calls china explains. we're fully committed to one china policy just combo. but they don't repeat the rich rhetoric towards the national community in days after getting off the call with china america begin suggesting i one must have an independence or presentation in the room which isn't just a stepping stone, but it's like the last 4 sessions. so in this, no, it's a little bit like you're going to have both ways to say we're going to live by the agreements. but at the same time that you throw them away, you know how to strategic advantage. so it's very, how can you have diplomacy or, or is it must be very frustrating. well, in it but georgia, me, where's the, where's the gray hairs in the professional isabel this? i mean, anyone that knows anything about american policy in the pacific is so preaching, ambiguous, that that's the corners, the corner stone of it. ok. and that is before the quote unquote rise of ch

-china. it comes to taiwan, though, the world has a different view of taiwan than it does of hong kong. there is great anxiety. the potential of a clash between the two is real as far as he is concerned. so we will have to watch what they do. shery: it was one virtual summit that really doesn't change the long-term picture. you need to have a better strategy for both sides to come together. this coming at a time when we continue to have all of these other issues in the background as well as supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures as well. haslinda: communications need to be kept open. they talked about how they want janet yellen to keep talking, communication has to be open. today there will be a discussion on emerging power. we have a minister of india who will be weighing in on the issue, coming as the backdrop of tensions between india and china as a border going on, and the clashes remained. shery: what to expect the rest of the day as we are wrapping up the final day of the b

so if you want to the fuel situation, just the found china, you know, we will stick by the one china policy. and this is where the implicitly comes in because it's a button that he calls china explains, we're fully committed to one china policy just combo. well, they don't repeat the rich rhetoric international community. one days after getting off the call with china, america begin suggesting pie one must have an independence or presentation in the room, which isn't just a stepping stone, but it's like the last that before the session. so it's know, it's a little bit like you're going to want to have both ways to say we're going to live by the agreements. but at the same time that you throw them away, you know how to strategic advantage. so it's very, how can you have diplomacy or, or is it must be very frustrating? well, in it but georgia, me, where's the, where's the gray hairs in the professionalism? well this, i mean, anyone that knows anything about american policy in the pacific is so preaching ambiguity that that's the corners the corner stone of it. ok. and that is before th

one china policy. and this is where the implicitly comes in because that's what it calls, trying to explain. we're fully committed to one china policy just combo, but they don't repeat these rhetoric towards the international community. after getting off the call with china, america begin suggesting by one must have an independent representation in the urine, which isn't just a stepping stone, but it's like the last that before secession. so this know if a little bit like your brand new on both ways. you say we're going to live by the agreements, but at the same time a throw them away in order to how's your strategic advantage? so, it's very how can you have diplomacy or is it must be very frustrated. well, in each but georgia, me, where's the, where's the gray hairs in the professional isabel this? i mean, anyone that knows anything about american policy in the pacific is so preaching ambiguity. that's, that's the corners. that's a cornerstone of it. ok. and that is before the quote unquote rise of ch

as i've said before the china of 2021 is not the china of 1971 or even the china of 2011. china today is challenging the united states and destabilizing the international community across every dimension of power. political, diplomatic, economic, military, and even cultural, with an alternative and deeply disturbing model for global governance. i truly believe that china today led by the communist party and propelled by xi jinping's hypernationalism is unlike any challenge we have faced as a nation before. for decades, we failed to comprehensively address china's growing reach of its predatory economic behavior and aggressive efforts to coerce its neighbors in a maritime domain. its dangerous flexing of military muscle against taiwan, and its campaign of genocide against the uyghur people as well as the imposition of the chilling system of digital authoritarianism to suppress its own people. they are more active and more emboldened than ever before. the right basic framework for thinking about our relationship with china today is strategic competition. not because that is

should china attack it or invade it? okay, well, so since this was causing them, the chinese, this great anxiety about similar tenuously while that's happening in the south china sea or the indo pacific as, as we now call it the all because we'll the pull out of get this done. i mean the obviously the we their easton took his turn is that make the movement has been taken off the u. s. terrorist list and china is putting $2000000.00 of bond leave investment to have this done. one f. b, i whistle blow, sybil. edwin said, need to see is jin chang is the next day. one is actually it happening simultaneously? is that credible that neo is a little bit? i think this is very credible because me and part of sullivan's talk. he said, part of setting the part of setting this new global order in the c n n interview. he said, well, he said also it would be based on enshrining the text of the declaration, the universal declaration of human rights into every international institution as well as into the order. and i think it's very cle

indeed, and china is offerin: technologies. indeed, and china is offering green _ technologies. indeed, and china is offering green technologies - technologies. indeed, and china is offering green technologies as - technologies. indeed, and china is| offering green technologies as part offering green technologies as part of its one belt one road initiative. some critics say is try to use it for commercial and global influences well what would you say to that? i well what would you say to that? i would say that we need to see how the competition in the markets that urgently— the competition in the markets that urgently need to new technologies, and need _ urgently need to new technologies, and need the infrastructure that will power our carbon constrained future _ will power our carbon constrained future and — will power our carbon constrained future. and i would welcome competition between china and other nations— competition between china and other nations given that that willjust continue — nations given that that willjust continue to bring down the cost and bring _ co

is great because china is on our side against the soviet union, even though china was then in the midst of this cultural revolution. but all great and good guys because outside and that went on from why to why? because it was still a grade below that it was russian. and you can see that manifested in the expansion of nato. and then i think, you know, right, you know, with trauma and weight, china is now a serious economic rival. i mean, you know, it will be the number one economy in the world, but trump made this into a known media, logical conflict. i mean, he was taking on everybody who's of economic interest class and those of the united states when buying is done, he said, going back to the cold war aspect to it, which is china's e d. a logical rival, chinese amount waging some sort of a flight project. they've got an american idea that waging a flight of b r a. and we're going to go, we're going to go to a short break, but george's right. that's why they got rid of for those reasons. exactly. all right, we're going to go to a short breaking up about your break. we'll continue our d

however, the china is not the china global change, and now it's more of a direct competitor to united states. so there's more of a need, therefore, to renegotiate economic partnership as well. to also accommodate on the what format they can actually come. deep level are going to leave out there because unfortunately time has come up against us. but i want to thank all august to go hydro clean and glen d. c. thank you. to course for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website. i'll just here at dot com for further discussion. go to our facebook page, that's facebook dot com, forward slash a j inside story. you can also join the conversation on twitter. we are at a inside story for me, robots, and i hope to hear you bye. for now. the ah. a war in afghanistan is now told will non taliban figures make up a part of them that american youth can report within the caliber believe it. there will be a powerful itala baldessari inside story parker, a frank assessment of the days headlines subscribe. now, however you listened to podcast with the world's pollinators ar

s. continuously runs warships through the south china sea, key word being china. you know, the u. s. is still fighting world war 2, a world war one. this idea of territorial warfare is gone. nobody has it. china isn't taking over places. russia isn't taking over places. they're actually doing business overseas, especially the chinese in africa and elsewhere in latin america and elsewhere. the was still obsessed with this idea of taking territory. it's so antiquated, nobody does it any war any more. and again, you have to look back to why it's what we call the deep state is what we call washington. i mean, as much as i'd hate and who here war will be nice to see washington media relevant again and revert to the swamp from whence it came. well, a men on that, peter, you mentioned august 1914 and a perfect historical parallel. but i think as we look at ukraine right now, august of 2008 seems very appropriate given the, you know, you have this demetrius yarborough's, a fanatic nazi like figure. all he wants is a conflict in the dom bass. he wants to kill people, he's recently been bro

the m relations with china. there is by the way, and there is, for example, need to have the last go, you buy the, find china important, very an oil one good shoot. and you have your right from my end ribeiro you while you or you there? oh, you do more watch, you know, it's a, it's a huge variety of being that you haven't had to chinese either very cool style or great choice. but you're quite right here. if i know how they are out there liberal ideology. oh did you, why did it take so much time for the night of the day trying to has been growing reach in the last 40 years. right. why don't, you know, will be us. there will be 3 be represented by intellectuals and then by some wall in the room that interest you step. if you get reach it, you get all that stuff. the american demographic that we're just arguing what they, when they get 5000 goals. and one was, it was, it was, you know, because you have maybe reached which to accept american values. and you have made just the way to see, you know, and that spoke to