chuck jones, the union president had told me, it's life and death. somebody is losing their house and then they lose their truck, lose their life, their wife will leave them and eventually they're going to lose their life. that's what he told me. he has been through eight plant closings at that point and i couldn't wrap my head around it. what are you talking about? and by the end he was out of about 300 workers there were laid off, three of them died within a year. one drank himself to death as it appears. another seem to have, died of liver disease and then the one i followed who i was deeply close to passed away because he had chest pains and didn't go to hospital because he didn't have health insurance. as jobs become more precarious and his idea of staying for life with one company, it disappears. westermann ask ourselves as a country should we be time healthcare to employment? it's crazy that this worker who i loved and followed closely in the book died because of lack of health insurance. it's crazy that when you lose your job you lose your he

legal analyst, melissa murray, chuck rosenberg, brittany cunningham and natasha brown. thank you all for being melissa, let me start with you. we heard from the head of the naacp, the attorney for wanda cooper jones, the family attorney, reacting to this. it was nearly unanimous. that what we heard was celebration of relief, you could call it, and as we talked about earlier, the difference between being relieved and rejoicing. but the need for this to catalyze next steps moving forward. from a legal perative here, can you talk about the way the rhetoric we heard from the defense teams might have played into what we're seeing today and the way that the need for those next steps has been highlighted. >> sure. i think most lawyers looking at the defense lawyers would have been rightly appalled. i am someone who believes firmly in the right to counsel, but some of the tropes that were advanced by the defense team were frankly, deeply concerning. i think what we saw here was the jury being forced to confront whether or not they would be complicit is in advancing this narrati

and then he gives it to mother jones. and mother jones starts it and they blow it up. do you believe this guy, keep your eye on chuck dolan jr. so morgan ortagus had a chance to fill in on "the view" and worked for state department spokesperson under mike pompeo. great friend of this show. who knows this information and knows how distracted the trump team had to be because of this russian probe. listen to how he confronts adam schiff who just wants to sell a book. see if adam schiff blinks at all. watch at home. >> you defended, promoted, you even read into the congressional record the steele dossier. we know last week the main source of the dossier was indicted by the fbi for lying about most of the key claims in a dossier. >> first of all, whoever lied to the fbi or lied to christopher steele should be prosecuted. >> but you made of this information yourself for years by promoting this i think that's what republicans and people who entrusted you as the intel committee chair are so confused about your culpability in all of. this i completely disagree with your premise