certainly brewster and bradford and myles standish and some of the clergyman and so forth. >> thank you. we have a question from stephen who asks, why is it that only bradford history remains when the other person, i guess is referring to winslow, has more detailed accounts of their experiences? i suppose it would help to clarify that and say how winslow's accounts are available. >> right. winslow -- and feel free to add anything to this -- but winslow's published his first account in 1622-1624. they are more detailed because they're dealing with the farm work and compressed period of time. some of his later works like his attack on samuel and such are addressing specific issues. wenzel never set out to write an entire history of the experience of the pilgrims. he was writing about certain events, and as a result he could go into a great deal more detail, whereas bradford was trying to give us a much broader picture. >> i think that's right. going back to the shakespeare point, barbara has an interesting point. shakespeare was believed to have performed near the church that bradford att