charles the united states. and we called out, ah, she ging pings china as being a primary focus there. and i think, you know, i'd like to push back a little bit on this concept of the united states lecturing. china. ok if you go to practically any corner of the world today, whether it's with in europe or china's neighbors in east asia, there has been a confluence, all interests, an alignment with international norms, democratic values and the like that's been pushing back on what has been an assertive and even an aggressive chinese foreign policy that is used for instance, economic coersion against countries such as australia and south korea. we last of lears lithuania, most recently. and job, as i somewhat ironic chinese lane about the united states lecturing when chinese diplomacy or a quote has brought a new york term to our lexicon that a weird overseas i would push back on that a little. and with respect to the actual meeting yesterday. and the fact that it was a virtual meeting again, i think that's a pos

states -- wants to have the united states reenter the deal. it's a profound and important role and i think one that cannot be overlooked when talking about foreign-policy. i frequently try to include legislators talking about discrete bills they have coming through congress that impacts foreign-policy. it is a very important part of the u.s. foreign policy equation. host: chris from pittsburgh, pennsylvania. good morning. caller: i'm amazed how you can keep abreast of so many things going on in the world. the things i have on my mind is what's going on in the solomon islands. when island is sparring against the other because of the change in allegiance from taiwan to china. is this an indicator of what might happen elsewhere? can the u.s. do anything politically through negotiations with the rest of the world to protect taiwan in the future? do you think that is kind of a done deal? guest: specifically on the solomon islands, you have stumped me. the broader trend in the region -- the philippines is an example of this. countries not thinking t

welcome to all of you in the united states and around the world. i'm fareed zakaria coming to you live from new york. >>> today on the program -- joe biden goes abroad for only the second time as president to the g20 in rome. >> good evening, everyone. >> -- and to cop26 in glasnow. >> we meet with the eyes of america upon us. >> is america back atop the world stage, or are we in a post-american world? i will talk to the president's national security adviser jake sullivan. >> american leadership has to have a different character. >> about that place progress on climate change, concerns over china's military buildup, and much more. >>> and a tv personality whose views veer to the far right is eyeing running for president. i'm not talking about donald trump, rather france's eric zemmour. bernard-henri levy will tell us how this french funded op-ed will help us transform politics. >>> but first "my take." believe it or not there's real good news on the climate front this week. approximately 100 countries announced an agreement to cut methane emissions

in what way should all of us outside the united states see it as a national security threat to the united states? well, again, it is the possibility of external actors interfering and exploiting it and using it for more propaganda to sow more discord, turning it back again on the united states. the other point is that it really undermines our capacity for collective action. i am speaking out because i hope i'll get the attention of people on capitol hill who have a choice to make about how far down the this path of party infighting, or whether they can step up to the plate and try to figure out ways in which we can unify ourselves again. we just had the g20 meeting, cop26, this important climate summit in glasgow and everyone is looking to the united states to lead. 0ur internal discord, our inability to actually pass legislation or to even speak to each other in civil terms also undermines our capacity for taking action on major existential issues that affect everybody. and before we end, fiona, we do not have a lot of time, but i want to tap into your expertise as a continued close obse

welcome to all of you in the united states and around the world. i'm fareed zakaria coming to you live from new york. >>> today on the program -- joe biden goes abroad for only the second time as president to the g20 in rome. >> good evening, everyone. >> -- and to cop26 in glasnow. >> we meet with the eyes of america upon us. >> is he back on stop of the world stage or or we in a post-american world? i will talk to the president's national security adviser jake sullivan. >> american leadership has to have a different character. >> about that place progress on climate change, concerns over china's military buildup, and much more. >>> and a tv personality whose views veer to the far right, and eyeing running for president. i'm not talking about donald trump, rather francis eric zemmour. he will tell us how this french funded op-ed will help us transform politics. >>> but first "my take." believe it or not there's real good news on the climate front this week. approximately 100 countries announced an agreement to cut methane emissions 20% by 2030, cl

moreover, the united states is not a proper plaintiff. he cannot claim a sovereign interest in suing to enforce individual rights under casey, the remedy six of the complete before traditional equity. congress must create such novel remedies if there to exist at all. congress is rejected given the united states such relief while overwriting other at least indicate 14th amendment rights. like the petitioners in whole woman's health the united states ask this court to disregard all of this which deems s.b.-8 a novel solution for which -- novel problem for which this court must concoct a novel solution to even if it were and it is not such a request must be directed to congress. the united states cannot seriously assert that the constitution requires free enforcement federal judicial review. has that result in every other case. this court should reject its request for special for him, remedy and cause of action for this case alone. i welcome the court's questions. >> is there any instance in which the united states can do what it is doing no

now, in the dobbs case, which the united states supreme court is about to hear, the united states supreme court has a really rare opportunity to say, as justice scalia wrote in one of his opinions, that value judgments made on behalf of people should be voted on by those people and not dictated from washington, d.c. in the dodd case, the united states supreme court, mr. president, has the rare opportunity to say what we all know, and that is that america is this big, wide, open, diverse, sometimes messy, sometimes dysfunctional, sometimes imperfect, but always trying to get better group of good people. that's what america is. and we don't always agree. especially not on value judgments. especially not on the ultimate value judgment like when it is appropriate to take a human life that's why we get to vote. that's why we get to vote. and that's why we have elected representatives who oftentimes vote on our behalf, elected representatives who also can be unelected if we don't like how they vote. and finally, mr. president, in dodd, the united states supreme court has the rare opportunity to

charles the united states. and we called out, ah, she ging pings china as being a primary focus there. and i think, you know, i'd like to push back a little bit on this concept of the united states lecturing. china. ok if you go to practically in the corner of the world today, whether it's within europe or china's neighbors in east asia, there has been a confluence, all interests, an alignment with international norms, democratic values, the like that's been pushing back on what has been an assertive and even an aggressive chinese foreign policy that is used for instance, economic coersion against countries such as australian, south korea, velaz over the years, let the waning most recently and europe. it's, i somewhat ironic chinese lane about the united states lecturing when chinese diplomacy, quote, unquote, has brought a new york term to our lexicon that a weird overseas i would push back on that a little and with respect to the actual meeting yesterday. and the fact that it was a virtual meeting again, i th

now, the united states cannot have the cake, i eat it back in 1979, the united states did the right thing. they sever the relations with taiwan. they cancel the defense treaty between the united states and taiwan. they withdrew all the u. s. troops, station leaving taiwan. now if they want to really reverse that, be my guest, but the consequences will be there will be no more to grow by the relations, but each other and the united states and the real legal status between channels. mainland anti one is the, our finished a civil war. why taiwan ended up with his current situation. first of all, it's because of the cairo declaration pottstown declaration. secondly, it's because of the civil war in china. the nationalist of forces, fred that mainland and settled down in taiwan. so if the united states keep provoking that they probably will provoke the resumption of the civil war. and do you think the u. s. wants to shit its sons and daughters plot for a civil war between china's mainland and china as taiwan province be. ready my guest, i don't think the united states want to shed blood of the

it shows a complete lack of respect for the president of the united states and the united states of america and they're trolling the president of the united states. that's what this should concern everybody about. the president set patterns of decision making and how they cree act to crisis situations. the president showed what he did with afghanistan, what they did with criteria -- crimea, when he that was the situation room with president obama, look, he set a pattern of indecision or no decision at all and they're going to exploit that and this is one way for them to do it. they're kind of trolling the united states. that should be the biggest concern, not a defense agreement going forward. that happens all the time. what should concern americans is does this president and this administration and the national security advisor, have the will if something happens, especially if something happens with taiwan, are we going to do anything or are we going to say okay, that's going to happen and there's nothing we can do about it. that's my biggest concern. jason: well, it should be a concern.

, as i have been, or united states attorney, as i have been also, and assistant united states attorney, know that sometimes governments are sued. state and federal governments. and settlements are in the best interest of those governments because a trial could result in even greater liability than a settlement could. am i correct in that view? >> you are, senator. and i think the american public was united in its condemnation of the family separation policy of the prior administration, and it is that that will constitute a jury in any trial. >> thank you. senator cruz. >> thank you, mr. chairman. secretary mayorkas, you told senator graham that you have released somewhere between 500,000 and 700,000 illegal aliens. you told me you don't know how many of those had covid. you told me further you don't know how many of those were sexually assaulted by the human traffickers who brought them in. when you were talking with chairman durbin, you talked about catch and release. and chairman durbin asked you whether illegal immigrants who were released under catch and release and given a court d

united states needs to step up our efforts there. there are, just from different things that i have been briefed on in the intelligence committee, nations to feel burned by the way china has -- vaccine diplomacy. it is not like it has been 100% rosy for them and people to appreciate the united states' efforts, but that big differential is something we ought to close the gap on. jonathan: you have been a voice that some have described as the progressive voice on foreign policy. someone who looks at foreign policy in a new way, breaking out bold thinking. obviously there's a lot of thought that has been put into how we have decided to depart from a post 9/11 counterterrorism posture with our foreign policy. a lot of soul-searching is happening after afghanistan as well, that the united states has spent trillions of dollars. it's counterterrorism wars, efforts to nation build in other parts of the world and there is obviously a lot of fatigue in the united states about that. but i think there is also concern that one of the ways the uni

media or on media in the united states. so this american exceptionalism, again, is a, is a break. rational thinking, in my opinion, go ahead, team. well, make an exception. wait here and the scroll is very, i mean, what would you be having tonight? states relations with china. there is, by the way. and there is, for example, need to have the last go you why the old find china important over in oil longer and you have to ride from my end, ribeiro were you while the train you or is there was, you know, it's a, it's a huge, arise you're with being that you have a chinese very core file or 100 percent. great choice. but you're right here is i know how they are out there. liberal ideology, you know, why did it take so much time for the day trying to has been growing rich in the last 40 years. right? why don't, you know, will be for us there will be 3 be represented by intellectuals and was done by some of all in the room that interest you step if you get reach, you get all of this stuff, the american demographic that we're just

states and there extraordinary deviation from the very strategy has resulted in the united states global leader over admissions. and we have testimony today popping up countries like china and saying things aen deeply troubled by the mentality of the united states approach to china and antagonistic process under posture undermining climate cooperation, let me ask you how are supposed to act with the real country that lies about what's going on with a global pandemic, in the same breath there telling the world health organization nothing is going on that they're buying billions of pieces of masks and gloves that were manufactured in china and sold to other countries and buying them back into china so their citizens have protection and they can price gouge the rest of the world on the same ppe. how are we supposed to treat a country that is gonero out there and stolen sewer cyber attacks, intellectual property, innovation of americans, how are we supposed to treat a country that is gone out there illegal practices dumping products on the u.s. economy, killing jobs and affecting millions an

. >> the united states versus texas, general. >> mr. chief justice, texas designed the primacy of federal law is open if our constitutional structure and the states are free to escort to reconsider the presidents that they are not free to place themselves above this court nullify the course decisions in their borders, and judicial review necessary to vindicate federal rights as this case comes to the core, there are three questions. first, the texas is possible for this law, second, can the united states hold texas to account and third, is the injunctive religious available in the answers is yes, down the line. texas is responsible for the constitutional violations here and in enacted a law that clearly violates his course presidents and it can enter design that lot for the judicial review by offering counties to the general public to carry out this enforcement function in a structured this system proceedings and so burdensome. insignificant liability that they chill the exercise in the constitutional rights altogether. in the united st

states brings to mind 1980 book and people sense of the united states, is that your comparison? >> i love howard zinn's book when he came on 1980 i adopted it with my introductory history class in my university immediately and it was such a gift for students to have poetic and places and books that told the truth. i loved it and i got to know howard and his other books. it's such a classic marker for a change in the teaching of u.s. history but i do feel, it opens no other book at that time not with the precolonial people there and mostly not very accurate information if at all in u.s. history what he says is genocide very moving first chapter and for the native students and others in native american history classes, it was unprecedented to have a book that started in that way. he doesn't really deal with what happened during the civil war and the u.s. military didn't miss a beat in his move across the country and they rounded up all of the people that they can round up and they marched a long walk in a concentration camp. they were left until after the civil war, the army went

the united states and soviet union were competing much like the united states and china are competing today. he decided that he was going >> he decided he was going to take them middle east for america and the out of there. a pretty ambitious goal. he declared it very early on in a press conference he gave in 1969. he called for the expulsion of the soviet union from arab countries. and i asked him where they came from. he said he had discussions with nixon that basically they were -- as long as arab states were dependent on the soviet union, he could never achieve his objective, so he had to show them met on the one hand, soviet arms would never be allowed by the united states to achieve a victory for them, but if they turn to the united states, american diplomacy could give them what the soviet union could never give them through arms supports and the fact that the united states said the relationship did not do that, it gave him an advantage. he understood he had the advantage. whereas the state department was trying to work with the soviet union to advance the peace process, his wh

states for alleged malfeasance by the united states. i don't deny the harshness of the doctrine but i think that's inherent in the state secrets dock tin. >> suppose, mr. fletcher, there was overwhelming, essentially incontrovertible evidence that the acts here did take place in poland. suppose somebody had leaked videos that everybody had agreed were authentic. you know, what then? >> so again, i think the answer would be, those would be additional circumstances that the cia director or whoever was making the judgment in the first instance would want to take into account and would have to explain in the declaration, explaining why further disclosure could still harm national security. again, in that circumstance there would be concerns. the cia director talked about there being a difference between what appears to be definitive proof and formal confirmation by people with knowledge of the subject. >> i understand the argument about our relationships with our allies and it not necessarily being co-extensive on the question of whether so

having to find a human big me the and safety and refuge here in the united states. and then they come here where there's just, there was a level of unpreparedness. the evacuation that happened in august was ad hoc. it was not prepared. and that's why the other guys on this show, you know, and other so many other thousands of africans had said that military base and have a very uncomfortable stay where they had to know where to close that they fled with what day they had to not have access, for example, one of the issues that we're dealing with this access to, to when they're clothing. because they are essentially sleeping and ad hoc and tense across military bases in places like wisconsin where we understand it can get a very old and new winters. and so these are just obstacles that, that these folks are facing. and that's just the short term view. that's the issues we're dealing with in november and december of 2021. and then some of the issues that we're trying to assist as a community organization, as community members, is getting folks from settled making the mr

united states? ~ ., ., , states? well, external actors interfering — states? well, external actors interfering and _ states? well, external actors interfering and exploiting - states? well, external actors interfering and exploiting it i interfering and exploiting it and using it for more propaganda and some were discord turning it right again against the united states. but it's really undermining our means of collective action. i'm speaking out and opened by match to get the attention, particularly to the people on capitol hill on how for them to go down on this path rather than infighting, stepping up to the plate and seeing ways we can unify ourselves again. we just had the g 20 meeting, and this really important climate summit in glasgow and everyone is looking to the united states to lead. our internal discord, our inability to actually pass legislation or even speak to each other in civil terms is undermining our capacity for taking action on major existential issues that affect everybody. e

reaching the united states he says their only hope. for cubans, the doors have always been open. with or without immigration policies that favor us. it has been harder with the remaining mexico policy. in a gathering of migrants the size, a full cross-section of problems, from economic ruin, to climate change. from cuba to columbia, haiti and honduras. although the factors at home are more acute than ever, many are finding it hard to settle in mexico. in fact, a record number of people have applied for asylum in mexico this year. between january and october, there were 108,000 requests. 80% higher than during the previous president's six years in office. the asylum agency is underfunded, and struggles to cope. >> every nationality has increased. the numbers are growing. our capacity is limited. reporter: can you cope? >> with these people coming in now, we are overwhelmed. reporter: do you have the budget? >> no. that is the point. we are struggling for that budget. reporter: critics say the lack of funding shows the mexican government is not serious about helping migrants, a poi

s. forces, who are in the united states. and what they thought about afghans who had not what with the u. s. forces, and there's a very big difference there in public opinion and where the support lies. i'm sure that you will actually see that in the lab. and how made an a rush in your work and in your, your daily life. i have a look here on my laptop. this is the international rescue committee. and they ask something that you actually ask every time we do a show like this, how can i welcome afghans to my community? you can donate, you can volunteer. you can translate, you can house a refugee family. you can hire a refugee if you're a business owner, so many ways to help a rash. ha, made me laugh. thank you so much for being part of the string today. appreciate you . thanks for watching. phoenix. ah, you'll ah, with the stages say, and it's time for a different approach. one that is going to challenge the way you think from international politics, to the global pandemic, and everything in between. upfront with me, mark lamon

not just for the united states but for all of us. we're standing at an inflection point in world history. we have the ability to invest in ourselves and build an equitable clean energy future and in the process create millions of good-paying jobs and opportunities around the world. cleaner air for our children, more bountiful oceans, healthier forests and ecosystems for our planet. we can create an environment that raises the standard of living around the world. and this is a moral imperative, but it's also an economic imperative. if we fuel greater growth, new jobs, better opportunities for all our people, and as we see current volatility in energy prices rather than cast it as a reason to back off our clean energy goals, we must view it as a call to action. high energy prices only reinforce the urgent need to diversify sources, double down on clean energy development and adapt promising new clean energy technologies so we cannot only -- we don't remain overly reliant on one source of power to power our economies and our communities

good evening to everyone here in the united states, and get running to you mr. president out beijing. -- morning to you mr. president of beijing. i'm happy we have time to meet, and i look forward to a candid and forthright discussion. as i said before, our responsibility as leaders of china and the united states is to ensure that the competition between our countries does not create conflict whether intended or unintended. it seems to me we need to establish some common sense guardrails, be clear about where we disagree, and work together where our interests intersect. none of this as a favor to either of our countries, but it is responsible world leadership, and you are a major world leader, so is the united states. our bilateral relationship will have a profound impact on both our countries and the rest of the world. we have responsibility to the world as well as to our people. it's why we believe all countries have to play by the same rules of the road. and the united states is always going to stand up for our interests and values, and those of our allies an

states. >> host: several highly publicized school mass shootings in the united states. what would you suggest to prevent those? >> this is something that has concerned me for 420 years and a major focus of my research. the research center that i'm president of reported a while ago that with all the school shootings, every type of school shooting all the way up to mask public shootings from 2000 through 2003 teen and what we found was that in the states, in the schools that allow teachers and staff to be able to go and carry guns there hasn't been one attack at any level in which anybody has been wounded or killed in any of those schools. the attacks for which they occur keep on occurring in places which teachers and staff aren't allowed to carry. you may have one police officer guarding the school but it's an almost impossible job. if you have one person he is the only that's known to have a gun and he is in uniform who do you think they go after first because they know if they can take out that one officer they are going to have free reign to go after the people. the a

i am hearing deep satisfaction with the united states -- that the united states is back and reengaged. i am also hearing deep concern about some of the actions for government has taken. >> china, as it has in the past and from now on, will never accept the u.s.' winning this criticisms. must a to the u.s. drops its frequent hegemonic actions of interfering with chinese internal affairs. >> i want to ask victor about this because we had strong words from the u.s., but also strong words from china. that is unusual. i have heard under president xi, there is assessment of that policy being described as aggressive diplomacy. china was no longer going to take criticism, but essentially take the fight to those who are opposed to it. now we are seeing a change. it is a suggestion that china has become concerned that that policy has overreached the mark and brought it closer to risky confrontation with the u.s. and others, and that perhaps is why we are seeing the styling back of rhetoric? >> -- took place very special circumstances. it was very cold. and then the -- on the chinese side and th

and the united states, and an ambassador both from the united states here and from south korea, can play an important role in facilitating that focus on the future rather than any tensions that legitimately exist in the past. the goal would be to keep the private conversations moving forward so there's no sense in a public way that there have been in their own perspective, roles and responsibilities from their public are not cornered from the opportunity to make the most of the 21st century. what japan faces, south korea, the united states, i see what people refer to as either climate change, infrastructure, i.t. protection, investments in the supply chain. those aren't challenges, they're tremendous opportunities for greater integration, greater advancements of our cooperation, and strengthening a rules-based system that we all three share. so from challenges, make them opportunities for greater cooperation between the three parties. two, focus on the 21st century opportunities, not the challenges of the 20th century. and third, don't do anything that surprises people in public so they

states or what would become the united states and that's an anachronism but where the colonies would become partners with the british motherland in a world empire so i found that really really interesting and i was wondering if you could elaborate on that ache as i think that's also a very fresh approach. >> so yes i do start the story in lexington and concord in before the french and indian war because what i'm trying to get at is this question of what causes a person to turn their back on the country and take arms against it? how are these rebels created? i don't think that they are born exactly think they become rebels rev period of time and one of the point to make in the book is that all of the individuals i look at the ones that become patriots and the ones who remained loyalist were born british subjects and they all thought of themselves as englishmen and englishwomen and for the most part they were proud of this because they looked at the rights they had as englishmen and they had a right to be represented in parliament in the right not to be taxed without their consent and

the united states and soviet union were competing, much like the united states and china are competing today. he decided that he was going to take the middle east for america and push the soviet union out. it was pretty ambitious. he declared it very early on in a press conference he gave in 1969. he called for the expulsion of the soviet union from air of countries. i --- from arab countries. he said that was from discussion with nixon and that was their objective. as long as arab states were dependent on the soviet union, he could never achieve this. he had to show them that on the one hand, soviet arms would ne ver be allowed by the united states to achieve a victory, but a fate turned to the united states, american diplomacy could give them what the soviet union could never give them. the fact the united states had the relationship with israel gave him an advantage. he understood he had the advantage. whereas the state department was constantly trying to work with the soviet union, to advance the peace process, his whole approach was the opposite. no. it is clear the soviet union h

now, the united states cannot have the cake, i eat it back in 1979, the united states did the right thing. they sever the relations with taiwan. they cancel the defense treaty between the united states and taiwan. they withdrew all the u. s. troops, station leading taiwan. now if they want to really reverse that, be my guest, but the consequences will be there will be no more to provide the relations between china and the united states and the real legal status between channels. mainland anti one is the our finished a civil war. why taiwan ended up with his current situation. first of all, it's because of the cairo declaration pottstown declaration. secondly, it's because of the civil war in china, the nationalist of forces, fred, the mainland, and settled down in taiwan. so if the united states keep provoking that they probably will provoke the resumption of the civil war. and do you think the u. s. wants to shit its sons and daughters plot for a civil war between china's mainland and china's taiwan provings. be. ready my guest, i don't think the united states want to ship blood of the a

energy and produce more oil for the united states to buy. this is going to bring europe's energy shortages to the united states and as you talked about in your opening remarks, it's going to make it worse for us. historically americans have benefited from the lowest energy prices in the industrialized world. in 2020 households in europe and japan paid between 85 to 215% more for electricity's than those in the united states. for natural gas, households in europe paid between 49 to 177% more than a families in the united states. if the house democrats get their way, many american families will have to decide whether they can pay their utility bills or put food on the table. one or the other, heat or eat. people will have to decide where their money goes. american businesses have also benefited from some of the lowest energy prices in the industrialized world. european businesses paid as much as 160% for electricity than those in the united states. same year european businesses paid much more for natural gas than businesses in the united state

factories to the united states government. these were contractual modifications that were made with the government emma moderna. i question, for dr. kessler is how could moderna have supplied more doses to covax under these conditions? >> moderna has the ability to supply united states and covax with the doses that are needed. moderna has that capacity, and we hope that they use it. >> it appears they are trying to do that, but given the contractual modifications they were faced with, you would agree that did place additional constraints on them? >> early on, you are exactly right. the president's position was that it was important to get americans the vaccine. and to do that, also the world. we have done that, we have plenty of vaccine year, we are donating that. now it is up to moderna. we will see over the next couple of weeks. we have enough vaccine in the united states, but moderna has sufficient capacity, i hope the deal between covax and moderna get signed. >> i appreciate your response. i think united states can be pro

in 2020 nafta was replaced by the united states texico canada agreement, or usmca. the usmca liberalizes digital trade, strengthens intellectual-property protections and establishes more than 26 separate committees to coordinate implication of the agreement by all those involved. our usmca working group which includes government representatives and other stakeholders is closely tracking the implementation of usmca. we're excited that president biden and prime minister trudeau have launched a roadmap to a renewed u.s.-canada partnership with commitments to work together on urgent challenges from rebuilding our infrastructure to fighting covid. through our unique candidate institute, wilson is closely following the progress of the roadmap and other important matters between our two great countries. we're looking forward to hearing more about these initiatives during today's discussion. with that, prime minister trudeau, welcome. and again, the floor is open to you for some comments, thank you. >> thank you very much, chris. thank you all for being here today. [applaus

as you know there's already in the united states and the united states congress -- also how to compete with china, define when they cheat and so forth. so this could be a way to achieve greater understanding. and again there are challenges as americans and those of us in congress we face. for example, i don't believe we've clearly defined when it is we should compete with china and when they're fairly competing with the united states and other nations, when they're cheating and when we need to call them out on it and finally when we ought to cooperate with them on certain issues like climate change or security in different regions of the world. >> you know, this is -- this is no small feat getting bipartisan legislation that is happening related to just to your center. it was introduced alongside republican mike gallagher, and both of you have spent time talking about china and what the challenge it represents. but you talked about it in very different ways. and you've characterized the challenge in very different ways. he had said china is a genocidal communist regime that now threate

on a plane from the united states, he sat next to a united states citizen, catherine clair too much ankle. they were soon married. catherine cleared human jenko. she was born in 1961 in the united states. from the age of 14, she was a member of the ultra nationalist union of ukrainian youth. she worked as director of the ukrainian national information service of the washington bureau of the ukrainian committee of the american congress. and also as an assistant to the under secretary of state for human rights and humanitarian affairs. and she worked in the us treasury and the u. s congress. the u. s. attention to the upcoming presidential elections was side by side with direct pressure on the ukranian establishment. major forces were engaged in the struggle, including george soros or wishing login credentials like lead me mission, last decisions, good love. so sorta sorta for some, yes. not a simple thing. there was 3 or will it was hit, natalie and i knew, well, what's going on? there were lemma yosh or i'm finance my map. she is in the mirror for the day, but yes to me of me and i mean t

what exactly the united states is doing here in provoking china. and at the same time, they're trying to provoke russia. so, you know, the, there are times when they thinking, well, what we need to do is to do a kissinger and reverse. we need to align ourselves and shine. they get separate the 2 great powers. and then they go back to no, no, no, we would prefer to confront russia and china together. let's have a global democracy summit which we can go about. also, we are a democratic and i mean, it is a policy that is guaranteed to create a doubts in the mind of the chinese leaders. and therefore, it is extremely dangerous. and that goes along with milly's famous or infamous, a telephone call to the chinese leaders during the days of the trumpet ministration, telling them, well, don't worry, we're not about to attack you. but if we do attack you, i promise, i'll give you a phone call ahead of time. so the chinese leaders really don't know what washington is doing, and i think that's why there is furious as they are. you know, glenn, what i find rea

you geographic discrepancies in the united states too.— united states too. you do talk about that _ united states too. you do talk about that but _ united states too. you do talk about that but let's _ united states too. you do talk about that but let's park - united states too. you do talk about that but let's park that i about that but let's park that now for a minute and get back to the course of your career inside the nsc in the trump white house stopper you've already said to me you could see there were some pretty fundamental problems with trump's attitude even when you took the job in 2017 but as things unfolded, both with his reaction to the allegations that russia had intervened massively or tried to in the 2016 election, but also his reaction to certain events that occurred, like for example the poisoning of the former russian spy poisoning of the former russian spy circus grip all in salisbury england, surely you could see a pattern where trump was trying to avoid the reality of what putin's russia was and you were in the nsc and you were trying t

national commander jewish war veterans of the united states of america. the secretary of veterans affairs. ♪ announcer: ladies and gentlemen, the president of the united states. playing] [hail to the chief playing] ♪ announcer: please remain standing for the invocation given by the chaplain, national director of chaplain service for the department of veterans affairs. >> let us pray. almighty and loving god, we come before you this day to honor our nation's veterans. those men and women who have bravely given of the cells -- themselves. throughout our nations history, you god created our nations veterans with unique if, abilities, talents, and values which would guide them to a unified calling and mission, the defense of our nation's freedoms. we are ever so grateful for those men and women who sacrificially chose to leave the comforts of family, friends, home, and security to use their god-given gifts and abilities for the most noble mission of the preservation of our nation. our nations veterans have faced horrific challenges on land, sea, and air.

of you threatened by the united states. they have grown increasingly goes together. so nice. it's kind of finds it. so someone isolated when we're facing this are very substantial long and demon b again, you know that we can bring up a new cold war paradigm. but on china is a, nominally a communist country. it's run by a communist party, but it doesn't want to export its ideology unlike during the 1st cold war. russia, well, it's just a conservative country out there interested in its own self interest here. but how, how do account is american exceptionalism play in this? because i'm the one hand, you know, if you're just said, you know, there's a finally, a reckoning, a recognition. finally, it took a long time that there are other great powers. ok. but the, there they're not this, these 3 great powers are not the same for the u. s. is very and tend to export ideology rules based order and all that other nonsense here. and that's what for me, makes it dangerous because the, that we're russia, basically, it's a status quo p

>> the united states versus texas, general. >> mr. chief justice, texas designed the primacy of federal law is open if our constitutional structure and the states are free to escort to reconsider the presidents that they are not free to place themselves above this court nullify the course decisions in their borders, and judicial review necessary to vindicate federal rights as this case comes to the core, there are three questions. first, the texas is possible for this law, second, can the united states hold texas to account and third, is the injunctive religious available in the answers is yes, down the line. texas is responsible for the constitutional violations here and in enacted a law that clearly violates his course presidents and it can enter design that lot for the judicial review by offering counties to the general public to carry out this enforcement function in a structured this system proceedings and so burdensome. insignificant liability that they chill the exercise in the constitutional rights altogether. in the united st

of you threatened by the united states. they have grown increasingly goes together. so nice. it's kind of finds it. so someone isolated with facing this are very substantial long and demon b. again, you know that we can bring up a new cold war paradigm. but on china's and nominally a communist country, it's run by a communist party. but it doesn't want to export its ideology. unlike during the 1st cold war, russia, well, it's just a conservative country out there interested in its own self interest here. but how, how do account is american exceptionalism play in this? because i'm the one hand, you know, if you're just said, you know, there's a finally, a reckoning, a recognition. finally, it took a long time that there are other great powers. ok. but the, there they're not this, these 3 great powers are not the same for the u. s. is very and tend to export. it's ivy ology rules based order and all that other nonsense here. and that's what for me, makes it dangerous because the, that russia, basically it's a status quo power

that is threats of punishment of united states citizens. understand what that is, then develop the algorithms and supporting technologies needed. narrowly focus at, let's have it as a just break glass initiative. on a day-to-day basis these would be used, but when there is an intense crisis -- over ukraine or whenever the crisis is going to be -- then we would have something to fall back on. we would have some operational capabilities. above all, let's exercise those capabilities, because they are not real unless you exercise them first. mr. ferrari: one of the points made by the proponents of operations in russia and china is that there is no time period between war and peace. we live in this constant gray zone, and both of you have made this point. first off, how would you exercise in case of emergency break glass, when really we are in this constant fight? second, to elisabeth point attack --'s point on these ceos, i believe a lot of them view their role as global in nature. if you look at microsoft and amazon and twitter and instagram,

in the united states, but around the world. if you think back to the 2017 women's march which was not only here in d.c., it was on every continent and it was organized transnationally and digitally in only 10 weeks because of this rising activism and as a counsel of a foreign relations team began to track this rising activism and we started to see not only an increase in the number of women raising their voices starting with the women's march moving to the me too movement which glows globally starting october, 2017th to an incredible rise in a broad range of countries from afghanistan to brazil to places in the middle east that would surprise you and women were struck by this incredible wave and actually had the opportunity to host iraqi women activists as survivor of sexual slavery at the hands of isis at the council where she was advocating against discrimination and sexual abuse against women and met with many activists at the meeting and began treating stories about this rise we were seeing around the world that the stories

on a plane from the united states, he sat next to a united states citizen, catherine clair too much ankle. they were soon married. catherine clara too much jenko. she was born in 1961 in the united states. from the age of 14, she was a member of the ultra nationalist union of ukrainian youth. she worked as director of the ukrainian national information service of the washington bureau of the ukrainian committee of the american congress and also as an assistant to the under secretary of state for human rights and humanitarian affairs. and she worked in the us treasury and the u. s congress. the u. s. attention to the upcoming presidential elections was side by side with direct pressure on the ukranian establishment. major forces were engaged in the struggle, including george soros or wishing login credentials, a good evening mission last decision. good love. so tourist florida. so awesome, yes, no problem in to put on there was prior, when they would have to sit naturally and i knew, well, what's going on? they were like, my windows are on the now rosalind map, houston and mirror for the i