arndt: i do think racing is important. the picture behind me is lamonde, the dna of the porsche brand. they have never really tried formula one, except in the early 1990's. it was a failure then. i don't think f1 is a necessity. it is truly a scenario for porsche. there have been press articles that the brand might come back. i think it's very interesting scenario. amanda: great to have you with us. arndt ellinghorst, bernstein's managing director and senior research analyst. coming up, omicron throws another wrench into company plans to retur to office. we will talk about what workers are thinking right now. stay with us. ♪ amanda: this is "bloomberg markets." perhaps unsurprisingly the push to bring people back to the office as a new foe, omicron. how is it affecting businesses that had returned to work plans in place for months and the employees he will be returning? rebecca ray, vice president of workforce research with new data on this. great to heavy with us. what you seeing in terms of the current sentiment around

thank you for being here, director arndt. i do just want to say, i think we should be clear that this is really a false choice. this is not a real choice for this body, because i don't really understand how funding a recall election supports our school district. it doesn't go toward any programming. it doesn't go toward any strategies to address the achievement gap that exists for our young people. it doesn't increase pay for educators. it doesn't do any of the things that we need resources for our schools, so for us to pretend like we're doing something great for the school district, i would have to disagree with anybody who thinks that is the case. so it's a real false choice. however, the district should not be paying for a recall. the city should not be paying for a recall. and trying to remove all people of color from their elected posts. that's not something that the district or the city should be charged with and the people who call for the recall should have to pay for this themselves. so we're at a point where we're

thank you for being here, director arndt. i do just want to say, i think we should be clear that this is really a false choice. this is not a real choice for this body, because i don't really understand how funding a recall election supports our school district. it doesn't go toward any programming. it doesn't go toward any strategies to address the achievement gap that exists for our young people. it doesn't increase pay for educators. it doesn't do any of the things that we need resources for our schools, so for us to pretend like we're doing something great for the school district, i would have to disagree with anybody who thinks that is the case. so it's a real false choice. however, the district should not be paying for a recall. the city should not be paying for a recall. and trying to remove all people of color from their elected posts. that's not something that the district or the city should be charged with and the people who call for the recall should have to pay for this themselves. so we're at a point where we're

. >> president walton: i think we heard from the controller earlier and also from director arndt that there is no time line, particularly no immediate timeline for the 3.25 to be allocated. and so i'm -- i just want to state that for the record that we're not under a gun here in terms of the 3.25 having to be allocated any time. -- soon. so i just wanted to state that. so we have a motion on the floor to continue. it was seconded by supervisor chan. i don't see anyone else in the roster. madame clerk? >> clerk: on the motion to continue the $3.25 million to january 4, 2022, supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: aye. >> supervisor preston: aye. >> supervisor ronen: no. >> supervisor safai: no. >> supervisor stefani: no. >> supervisor walton: aye. >> supervisor chan: aye. >> supervisor haney: no. >> supervisor mandelman: no. >> supervisor mar: aye. >> supervisor melgar: no. >> there are five ayes and six nos with supervisorses ronen, safai, haney, melgar in the consent. >> motion to continue fails. supervisor safai? >> supervisor safai: just before us -- >> president walton: madame c