why don't you check out the views of scott ritter at r t dot com or scott ritter is a former us intelligence officer. he says he's not buying what the tabloids are selling you can read. why right now? in the meantime, here on the program, a brits could soon have to pay double to heat their homes. that's according to u. k. fuel poverty monitor, citing a plan to increase to the energy price comp. next april. the cost of living in the u. k. is that it's highest level in a decade with household energy bills, the biggest driver, when the costs of essential services go up. those on the lower thing can get his hardest estimated at some of 4000000 british households are currently behind on their energy bills. each and every winter, roughly 10000 deaths nationally caused by cold homes. and the latest polling suggests half the country is more worried about the cost of heating than it is about anything to do with cove it? well, we spoke with james anderson, the founder of a company that provides emergency heating to the elderly, assess the u. k. government is not doing enough to help those in all those

well, why not check out that these are scott ritter is available on our website. the u. s . x intel officer isn't flying this invasion to find out why adopting dot com. we discussed the latest diplomatic spat with michael maloof, a former senior security policy analyst in the office of the you a secretary defense. he says, this is a case of double standards. i think that by this constant harassment in the black sea, in an area half way remove from from the united states and going right up against the borders of the russian federation. i think it really isn't aggressive move. the exercise in the black sea area was in response to the failures and the expulsion of the united states from afghanistan. so the united states has to show re assertiveness that it's still a leader in the so called free world. it lacks any recognition really, spheres of influence, just like if the russians were to come into the area of gulf of mexico tomorrow, you can believe that there would be a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth in washington. the united states feels that it can do it to others

well, you can check out the views of scott ritter on a website. the u. s. format intel officer isn't buying any of it on our why fi heading to r t dot com? we discussed the latest diplomatic spots with michael maloof. he's a former senior security policy analyst in the office of the u. s. secretary of defense. he says this is a case of double standards. i think that out by this constant harassment in the black sea in an area half way remove well from, from the united states and going right up against the borders of the russian federation. i think it really isn't aggressive move the exercise in the black sea area was in response to the failures and the expulsion of the united states from afghanistan. so the united states has to show re assertiveness that it's still a leader in the so called free world. it lacks any recognition really, spheres of influence. just like if the russians were to come into the area of gulf of mexico tomorrow, you can believe that there would be a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth in washington. the united states feels that it

why not check out the views of scott ritter on a website from us until officer does not by what various outlets are selling. read all about it from r t dot com. meanwhile, kia continues to push the moscow threat normative, the defense minister has no call in the u. s. the u. k. and calendar to provide military support to counter this suppose at risk of a russian invasion and he's warning of a potential migrant crisis. if war does break out, we spoke to political commented or crisp on brian why he thinks key of is raising the said. posted threats were always hysterical demands latino to join nato. and it should be supplied with high tech weapons by america in the west. so key ab is becoming more warm cervical because it's going to the situation and it's not getting what it was, the way it sounds, a nasal membership. but there are growing voices in the way. you are say, why is you create not being allowed to join nato? despite the fact wagner piece is very clear. this is a read why image russian will not want to be cross. good. simply, if you creating the joy nato, it will be what was ove

ritter on our website. the former us and tell officer doesn't by what various outlets are selling. read all about it and r t dot com in. well, he have continues to push the moscow threat nora to the defense ministers calling on the u. s. the u. k. on caliber to provide military support to counter the supposed at risk of a russian in patient, and he's warning of a potential migrant crisis. if more does break out, we spoke to political commented or crisp ambry on why he thinks kia is raising the suppose a threat. because you create is becoming more, more almost hysterical in demand if you want to join a. so i may be supplied with high tech weapons by america in the west, so it is becoming more warm cervical because it's going to the situation and not getting what he wants to weigh a membership. but there are growing voices in the way. you are say, why is you create not being allowed to join nato despite the fact was, is very clear. this is a read why image russia will not want to be cross good simply if you'r

ritter on our website. the u. s. x intel officer is not buying any of it. she can find out why being so an article now we discuss the latest diplomatic spat with michael maloof, who's a former senior security policy analyst from the office of the you a secretary defense. he says, this is a case of double standards. i think that out by this constant harassment in the black sea in an area half way remove well from, from the united states and going right up against the borders of the russian federation. i think it really isn't aggressive move the exercise in the black sea area was in response to the failures and the expulsion of the united states from afghanistan. so the united states has to show re assertiveness that it's still a leader in the so called free world. it lacks any recognition really out spheres of influence. just like if the russians were to come into the area of gulf of mexico tomorrow, you can believe that there would be a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth in washington. the united states f

why not check out the views of scott ritter on a website. the u. s. x intel officer is not buying any of it? can you can read his thoughts and auntie don't comp now we've discussed the latest diplomatic spot with michael maloof. he's a former senior security policy analyst in the office of the u. s. secretary of defense. he says, this is a case of double standards. i think that out by this constant harassment in the black sea, in an area half way remove from from the united states and going right up against the borders of the russian federation. i think it really isn't aggressive move. the exercise in the black sea area was in response to the failures and the expulsion of the united states from afghanistan. so the united states has to show re assertiveness that it's still a leader in the so called free world. it lacks any recognition really, spheres of influence, just like if the russians were to come in to the area of gulf of mexico tomorrow, you could believe that there would be a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth in washington. the united sta

why not check out the views of scott ritter on our website. the u. s. x intel offset as my n is it reads y and r t dot com we discuss the latest diplomatic spat was michael belief, former senior security policy analyst in the office of the u. s. secretary defense . he says this is a case of double standards. i think that by this constant harassment in the black sea, in an area halfway remove from from the united states and going right up against the borders of the russian federation. i think really isn't aggressive move the exercise in the black sea area was in response to the failures and the expulsion of the united states from afghanistan. so the united states has to show re assertiveness that it's still a leader in the so called free world. it lacks any recognition really, spheres of influence, just like if the russians were to come into the area of gulf of mexico tomorrow, you can believe that there would be a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth in washington. the united states feels that it can do it the others, but it cannot be done to itself

ah, cross sucking democracy summit, i'm joined by my guest, scott ritter and dollar. he is a former intelligence officer and the united nations weapons inspector in orlando. we have fiorella, isabel. she is an independent journalist and co host of the convo couch. and here in moscow we have alexi. now i'm of, he is an expert at the russian international affairs council, or it crosses rosen effect. that means you can jump any time you want. now is appreciate scott, let me go to you 1st year. what's the point of best summit? i mean, i am really at a loss. i mean this is, it's not if it's like 1950 or 1980 and the cold war is still going on. and can you actually in a, have a, a, a principal, a union uniting principal around democracy in the world today because the u. s. has its own issues with democracy. i would imagine we have done countless numbers of programs on the democracy deficiency in the european union. and now we're doing it in 2021. what's your explanation? go ahead. scott: well, got a couple things. first of all, we have to understand that this is a campaign

ritter did tell us that. he thinks that night i was playing a very dangerous gang. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strengths. it's a very dangerous game because as president buddhist said, of russia has read lines in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real, and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated, as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if you train attacks or otherwise promotes russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous nato knows this. we need to put this into perspective of where nato and the u. s. is right now under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states, nato, was a very strange one, and it didn't get any better under biden. and nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to re

ritter on our website. the former u. s. intelligence officer doesn't by what various outlets are selling. read all about it on r t dot com in while key of continues to push the moscow threat narrative, the defense ministers calling on the u. s. u. k. and canada to provide military support against the legit risk of a russian invasion. he's also warning of a potential migrant crisis if war does actually break out. in spoke to political commentator, chris vanberry on why he thinks key of is becoming increasingly aggressive. ukraine is becoming more, more always hysterical in mind that if you like to join nato, be supplied with high tech weapons by america and west. so it is becoming more worn circle because it's sort of the situation and it's not getting what it wants. the way, nissan nasal membership. but there are growing voices in the way. you will say, why is you could not be allowed to join nato, despite the fact that this is very clear, this is a read why image russia will not allow you to be cross. good

ah, cross sucking the democracy summit, i'm joined by my guest, scott ritter and dollar. he is a former intelligence officer and the united nations weapons inspector in orlando. we have fiorella, isabel. she is an independent journalist and co host of the convo couch. and here in moscow we have alexi. now i'm of, he is an expert at the russian international affairs council or across acros. and in fact, that means he can jump anytime you want. now he's appreciate scott, let me go to you 1st here. what's the point of best some that, i mean i am really at a loss. i mean this is, it's that it's, it's like 1950 or 1980 and the cold war is still going on. and can you actually in a, have a, a principal, i, you know, uniting principal around democracy in the world today because the u. s. has its own issues with democracy. i would imagine we, i've done countless numbers of programs on the democracy deficiency in the european union, and now we're doing it in 2021. what's your explanation? go ahead. scott. well, got a couple things. first of all, we have to understand that this is a

ritter telling us he thinks nato's playing really dangerous game. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strengths. it's a very dangerous game because as president goodness said, of russia has read lives in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real. and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated. as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if ukraine attacks or otherwise provokes russia, russia will respond with the notion of russia, just starting a war of aggression against ukraine. out of the blue is ludicrous, and nato knows this. we need to put this into perspective of where nato and the u. s. is right now, under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states, nato, was a very strained war and it didn't get any better under bind. nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble a semblance of substance. they can pick the only t

ritter on our website. the former us and tell officer doesn't by what various outlets are selling. read all about it on r t dot com. meanwhile, kia continues to push that must go threaten or it's if the defense ministers calling on the u. s. the u. k. and canada to provide military support to counter the supposed risk of a rush, an invasion, and he's warning of a potential migrant crisis. if war does break out. we spoke to political commentator, chris bum, brian why he thinks key of is offering the ukranian is becoming more, more always hysterical demands that if you like to join nato to be supplied with high tech weapons by america in the west. so it is becoming more warm cervical because it's doing sort of the situation and it's not getting what he wants, the way becomes a need to memorize it. but there are growing voices in the way. you are say, why you create not being allowed to join nato despite the fact was, is very clear. this is a read why image russia will know why it's the cross. good, simply, if

check out the views of scott ritter, r t dot com. he's a former us intelligence officer. he just, he's just not buying what the tabloids selling right now. you can read wine that auntie thought come for the bad news for brits is they could soon have to pay double to heat their homes. that's according to the u. k. fuel poverty monitor, citing a plan to increase to the energy price cap in april. the cost of living in the u. k is at its highest level in a decade with household energy bills, the biggest driver, when the costs of essential services go up. those on the lowest incomes get heads hardest. it is estimated. some $4000000.00 british households are currently behind on their energy bills and each and every winter at least $10000.00 deaths nationally are caused by cold homes. that is, polling suggests half the country is more worried about the cost of heating than it is to do with anything related to cove it well james anderson, the founder of a company that provides emergency heating to the elderly. so the u. k. government is not doing enough to help those in all those

ritter, telling us he thinks, nights us playing a really dangerous game. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strengths. it's a very dangerous game because as president goodness said, of russia has read lives in these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real, and there will be real consequences if these red lines continue to be violated, as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if you train attacks or otherwise provokes russia, russia will respond with the notion of russia, just starting a war of aggression against ukraine. out of the blue is ludicrous, and nato knows us. we need to put this in the perspective of where nato and the u. s. is right now under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states, nato, was a very strained war, and it didn't get any better under bind. nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble a semblance of substance. they can pick the only target t

ah cross sucking the democracy summit, i'm joined by my guest, scott ritter in delmar. he is a former intelligence officer and the united nations weapons inspector in orlando. we have berella, isabel, she is an independent journalist and co host of the convo couch. and here in moscow we have alexis, now i'm of, he is an expert at the russian international affairs council or across sac rosen effect. that means he can jump any time you want. now he's appreciate, scott, let me go to you 1st here. what's the point of best some that, i mean, i'm really at a loss. i mean, this is, it's not it's, it's like 950 or 1980 and the cold war is still going on. and can you actually, in a, have a, a principal, a union uniting principal around democracy in the world today because the u. s. has its own issues with democracy. i would imagine we have done countless numbers of programs on the democracy deficiency in the european union, and now we're doing it in 2021. what's your explanation? go heads gone? well, a couple things. first of all, we have to understand that this is a campaign pr

why not check out the views of scott ritter on our website? the former us intelligence office officer doesn't by what various outlets are selling. read all about it on r t dot com. meanwhile, kiev continues to push the moscow threat narrative. the defense ministers calling on the u. s. u. k. and canada to provide military support against the alleged risk of a russian invasion. he's also warning of a potential migrant crisis. if war does actually break out. we spoke to political commentator, chris danbury, on why he thinks keith is becoming increasingly aggressive. ukraine is becoming more, more almost hysterical in demand if you like to join nato, and it should be supplied with high tech weapons by america in the west. so it is becoming more warm cervical because it's going to the situation and not getting what he wants to weigh in something a. so membership. but there are growing voices in the way. you are say, why is you create not being allowed to join nato? despite the fact was, is very clear, this is a red wine which russian will not allo

i'm joined by my guest, scott ritter and dollar. he is a former intelligence officer and the united nations weapons inspector in orlando. we have fiorella, isabel, she is an independent journalist and co host of the convo couch. and here in moscow we have alexi. now i'm of, he is an expert at the russian international affairs council or across acros. and in fact, that means he can jump anytime you want. now he's appreciate, scott, let me go to you 1st here. what's the point of best some that, i mean i am really at a loss. i mean, this is, it's that it's, it's like 1950 or 1980 and the cold war is still going on. and can you actually, in a, have a, a, a principal, i, you know, uniting principal around democracy in the world today because the u. s. has its own issues with democracy. i would imagine we, i've done countless numbers of programs on the democracy deficiency in the european union, and now we're doing it in 2021. what's your explanation? go ahead. scott. well, got a couple things. first of all, we have to understand that thi

back in the mid ninety's, former un weapons inspector, scott ritter told us he thinks nato is playing a very dangerous game. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strengths. it's a very dangerous game because as president buddhist said, of russia has read lines in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real. and there will be real consequences if these red lines continue to be violated. as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if you train attacks or otherwise provokes russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous, and nato knows this. we need to put us in the perspective of where nato and the u. s. is right now, under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states, nato, was a very strange one, and it didn't get any better under biden. and nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble a semblance of, of subst

ritter, told us that he thinks that nice. i was playing a very dangerous game. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strengths. it's a very dangerous game because as president goodness said, of russia has read lines in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real, and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated, as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if ukraine attacks or otherwise provokes russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous and nato knows this. we need to put this in the perspective of where nato and the u. s. is right now under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states, nato, was a very strange one, and it didn't get any better under biden. and nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble assembla

for me and weapons inspector, scott ritter, telling us he thinks nato is playing a really dangerous game. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strengths. it's a very dangerous game because as a present burden is said, of russia has read lines in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real. and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated, as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if ukraine attacks or otherwise provokes russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous and nato knows this. we need to put us in the perspective of where nato in the u. s. is right now under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states data was a very strange one and it didn't get any better under bind. nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble a semblance of substance. they can pick the only targe

ritter told us that he does think that night i was playing a very dangerous game. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strength. it's a very dangerous game because as president buddhist said, of russia has read lines in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real, and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated . as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if you train attacks or otherwise provokes russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous, and nato knows this. we need to put this in the perspective of where nato and the u . s. is right now, under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states, nato, was a very strange one and it didn't get any better under bye. and nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble a semblance of substance. they can pick the

ritter told us he thinks nato's plague a very dangerous game, though. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strengths. it's a very dangerous game because as president goodness said, of russia has read lines in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real, and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated, as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if ukraine attacks or otherwise provokes russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous and nato knows this. we need to put this into perspective of where nato in the u. s. is right now under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states, nato, was a very strained war, and it didn't get any better under bind. nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble a semblance of substance. they can pick the only tar

ritter on our website. the former us intelligence officer doesn't by what various outputs are selling. and you can read all about it on r t dot com. meanwhile, t of continues to push the moscow threat, narrowed it defense ministers calling on the u. s. u. k. and canada to provide military support against the alleged risk of a russian invasion is also warning of a potential migrant crisis. if war does actually break out. we spoke to political commentator, crisp ambrey, on why he thinks kia is being, is becoming increasingly aggressive. ukraine is becoming more, more almost hysterical in demand, so they'd be allowed to join nato. and it should be supplied with high tech weapons by america in the west. so it's becoming more warm cervical because it's going to the situation and it's not getting what it was totally, something needs to membership. but there are growing voices in the way. you will say, why is you create not be allowed to join nato despite the fact was no peace is very clear. this is a read why ima

when were you and weapons inspector scott ritter told us that he thinks that night i was playing a very dangerous gang. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strength. it's a very dangerous game because as a prison, buddhist said, of russia has read lives in these red lines aren't just figurative, they're real. and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated. as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if you train attacks or otherwise promotes russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous and nato knows this. we need to put this in the perspective of where nato and the u. s. is right now, under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states, nato, was a very strange one, and it didn't get any better under biden. and nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble assemblage of substance. they ca

ritter told us that he does think that nato is playing a very dangerous game. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strengths. it's a very dangerous game because as president goodness said, of russia has read lines in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated. as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if ukraine attacks or otherwise provokes russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous and nato knows this. we need to put this into perspective of where nato and the u. s. is right now, under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states, nato, was a very strange one and it didn't get any better under bye. and nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble a semblance of, of substance. they can pick the on

ritter telling us he thinks natives by the really dangerous game. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strengths. it's a very dangerous game because as president goodness said, russia has read lines in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real, and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated, as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if you train attacks or otherwise provokes russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous and nato knows us. we need to put this in the perspective of where nato in the u. s. is right now under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states navy was a very strange one and it didn't get any better under buying. and nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble assemblage of substance. they can pick the only tar

ritter on our website. he's an ex u. s. intelligence officer. he's not buying what the tabloids is selling. going to read about it a lot, c u dot com right now. now on the program here on our t, brits could soon have to pay double to heat their homes. that's according to the u . k. fuel poverty monitor, citing a planned increase to the energy price cap. next april. the cost of living in the u. k is at its highest level in a decade with household energy bills, the biggest driver, when the costs of essential services go up. those on the lowest incomes get hit hardest. it's estimated some 4000000 british households are currently behind on their energy bills and each and every winter, 10000 deaths nationally caused by cold homes. the latest polling suggests half of the country is more worried about the cost of heating than it is about cove it by james madison. the founder of a company that provides emergency heating to the elderly says the u. k. government simply put is not doing enough to help those in or faci

ah, ah, cross sucking democracy summit, i'm joined by my guest, scott ritter and dollar. he is a former intelligence officer and the united nations weapons inspector in orlando. we have berella, isabel, she is an independent journalist and co host of the convo couch. and here in moscow we have alexis, now i'm of, he is an expert at the russian international affairs council across like rules and effect. that means you can jump any time you want. now is appreciate, scott, let me go to you 1st here. what's the point of best some that, i mean, i'm really at a loss. i mean, this is, it's not, it's if it's like 950 or 1980 and the cold war is still going on. and can you actually in a, have a, a principal, a union uniting principal around democracy in the world today because the u. s. has its own issues with democracy. i would imagine we have done countless numbers of programs on the democracy deficiency in the european union, and now we're doing it in 2021. what's your explanation? go ahead. scott. well, got a couple things. first of all, we have to understand that this is a ca

ritter telling us he thinks nato's playing a really dangerous game. and there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strengths. it's a very dangerous game because as president buddhist said, of russia has read lines in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real, and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated, as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if ukraine attacks or otherwise provokes russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous and nato knows this. we need to put this into perspective of where nato in the u. s. is right now under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states data was a very strange one and it didn't get any better under bind. nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble a semblance of substance. they can pick the only tar

ritter to tell us that he thinks that nighttime is playing a very dangerous game. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strength. it's a very dangerous game because as president goodness said, of russia has read lives in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real. and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated. as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if ukraine attacks or otherwise provoked russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous and nato knows this. we need to put this into perspective of where nato and the u. s. is right now, under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states, nato, was a very strained war, and it didn't get any better under bye. and nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble assemblies of substance. they can pick the only

check out the views of scott ritter on our website. he's an ex u. s. intelligence officer. he's not buying or the tabloids are selling a lot more at auntie dot com or that one of the latest spots nato spy, plane endangered to civilian airline is a long rush of southern but coastline. a former pentagon analyst michael maloof believes it's a clear case of double standards. i think that by this constant harassment in the black sea, in an area half way removed from from the united states and going right up against the borders of the russian federation. i think really isn't aggressive move the exercise in the black sea area was in response to the failures. and the expulsion of the united states from afghanistan to the united states has to show re assertiveness that it's still a leader in the so called free world. it lacks any recognition really, spheres of influence, just like if the russians were to come into the area of gulf of mexico tomorrow, you can believe that there would be a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth in washington. the united states feels that it can do it to

why not check out the use of scott ritter on our website the former us and tell officer doesn't by what various outlets are silly. read all about it. a marquee dot com, the law. ukraine is also flushing the moscow threat normative. the defense ministers calling in the u. s. u. k. and canada to provide military support to counter this suppose at risk of a russian invasion and see is warning of a potential migrant crisis. if war does break out, we spoke to chris bambridge journalist and political analyst on why he thinks key has, is raising this. suppose the threats ukraine is becoming more, more almost hysterical demands that it be allowed to join nato. and it should be supplied with high tech weapons by america in the west. so kiev is becoming more and more cervical because it's going to the situation. it's not getting what it was, the way it's anthony. so membership, but there are growing voices in the way. you are say, why is you create not be allowed to join nato despite the fact was not, this is very clear. this is a read why english russian will not allow it to be cross. good, simp

why don't check out the views of scott ritter on our website. that's called richer as an x u. s. intelligence officer. he says he's not buying what the tabloids is selling right now. you can read why it r t dot com. well, meanwhile, ukraine is also pushing the moscow threat narrative or the defense ministers calling on the u. s. u. k. and canada to provide military support to counter the suppose at risk of a russian invasion, and his warning of a potential migrant crisis. if war does break out, that might seem like a bit of a threat to some people. let's learn more about this now. crossing live to crick, i'm very, a journalist and political analyst joining us a live here when he international chris a very good evening to you. you've heard the reports. you've seen the tabloids. russia has repeatedly denied any plans, the military action against ukraine. why is key of right now raising the supposed to threat, do you thing? so this is still on here. i think there's the restaurant for joe biden. i'm a grown for this service you encounter with you. korean is becoming more, more alm

back in the mid ninety's, former un weapons inspector scott ritter told us that he thinks nato is playing a very dangerous game. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strengths. it's a very dangerous game because as president buddhist said, of russia has read lines in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real, and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated, as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if you train attacks or otherwise provokes russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous and nato knows us. we need to put this in the perspective of where nato and the u. s. is right now under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states, nato, was a very strange one and it didn't get any better under bind. nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble assemblage of substance. the

why not check out the views of scott ritter on our website? the former u. s. intelligence officer doesn't by what various outlets are selling. read all about it on r t dot com. meanwhile, key as continues to push the moscow threat narrative, the defense ministers calling on the u. s. u. k. and canada to provide military support against the legit risk of a russian invasion is also warning of a potential migrant crisis. if war does actually break out. we spoke to political commentator, crisp ambry on why he thinks key f is becoming increasingly aggressive. ukraine is becoming more, more almost hysterical in demand if you like to join a. so i should be supplied with high tech weapons by america in the west. so it is becoming more warm cervical because it's going to the situation. it's not getting what it wants to weigh a membership. but there are growing voices in the way. you want to say why you could not be allowed to join nato despite the fact was, is very clear. this is a read why image russian will not want to be cross. good, simply, if your credit was to

back in the mid ninety's, former un weapons inspector, scott ritter told us he thinks nato is playing a very dangerous game. there's nothing about what nato is doing right now. that makes any sense whatsoever. at the end of the day, they're only playing to russian strengths. it's a very dangerous game because as president buddhist said, of russia has read lines in that these red lines aren't just figurative. they're real, and there will be real consequences if these red lines are continue to be violated . as far as anybody can tell, is not prepared to invade ukraine unprovoked. if ukraine attacks or otherwise provokes russia, russia will respond. but the notion of russia just starting a war of aggression against ukraine, out of the blue, is ludicrous and nato knows us. we need to put this in the perspective of where nato in the u. s. is right now, under the trump administration, the relationship between the united states, nato, was a very strange one, and it didn't get any better under biden. and nato right now is looking for relevance and looking to reassemble a semblance of substanc