following the story involving prince andrew chadwick. thanks for joining us. live here nazi international. i guess my 1st question might be, what in pipes do the details of this newly released document have on the case? well, just because as the report said, prince andrew is not explicitly named in this agreement. so this is an agreement that jeffrey epstein settled with virginia roberts in 2009, you received $500000.00 to basically relinquish any sort of future responsibility into it. specifically says the associate attorneys, employees, etc. now it doesn't name prince andrew affectively, but disagreement was used by allan dirt, who it was a very famous lawyer here in united states to absolve himself of a case that, that virginia roberts brought worth a good 70 disagreement and the judge dismissed it. now it does, he may have been working reps you at the time of attorney, in which case you would be specifically protected or maybe wasn't. we're not sure. and was hoping this agreement will also absolve him. a being sued by virginia robert

>> it's better than a very royal name. >> chadwick. [laughter] >> "chadwick, could you run to whole foods?" [laughter] "get me some wine vermin? [laughter] >> take them with you. be good we are all out of rosacea! >> i wish. [laughter] dagen, isn't it weird that you cannot pick your name until you are -- obviously you cannot do it when you are a baby. maybe, that was a dumb question to begin with. [laughter] >> i think a bad name and cute baby is better than a good name and ugly baby. nobody will call kids out. rather than them picking on thin mother about the name, if they kid is ugly, tell her. wash the kids hair. "why's your kid so much smaller than all the other things question might [laughter] >> if the mother took a photo of herself -- holding the baby, and she put a filter over it.ig the baby looked like satan, plastic like damien. [laughter] >> is that the baby? >> black gloss over its eyes. don't want to be recognized. >> there was one like damien omen number 26. >> these are kind of funny. why do we have to have them? wouldn'

>> it's better than a very royal name. >> chadwick. [laughter] >> "chadwick, could you run to whole foods?" [laughter] "get me some wine vermin? [laughter] >> take them with you. be good we are all out of rosacea! >> i wish. [laughter] dagen, isn't it weird that you cannot pick your name until you are -- obviously you cannot do it when you are a baby. maybe, that was a dumb question to begin with. [laughter] >> i think a bad name and cute baby is better than a good name and ugly baby. nobody will call kids out. rather than them picking on this mother about the name, if the kid is ugly, tell her. wash the kids hair. "why's your kid so much smaller than all the other things question might [laughter] >> if the mother took a photo of herself -- holding the baby, and she put a filter over it. the baby looked like satan, plastic like damien. [laughter] >> is that the baby? >> black gloss over its eyes. don't want to be recognized. >> there was one like damien omen number 26. >> these are kind of funny. why do we have to have them? wouldn't i

we've journey to, pleasant company to chadwick, more chadwick, ringing my ears. i fly with british airways, so i know all about it. the legalese is, conditions of courage, ready by a ticket to go into play and it's a kind of a contract, isn't it? and if you know, spirit contract was, you can't wear this kind of thing. then what's the problem there or where they out of order, let me know. well, if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive? that's all subjective, that's of the beholder. you make the point that if someone wearing black lives matter mass, plenty of people, if i met offensive, they think it's a dog whistle for communism, for violence, things of this nature. the word that works would be asked to reboot the math. obviously not. there's also the other thing, this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt, us after webster, because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked, replaces math. so interesting, you know, if it depends on what the base now if a part of the contract you signed by flying th

the deep divisions and america kayla martin r t new york. jimson political commentator chadwick moore to say to the media twisted the whole narrative of the story. the media had drummed up a lot of times try to make this into some kind of racial thing and some political thinks the media from day one doesn't get the language. reporting on this. you have people who are just reminded of, obviously poisoned by the media. the media doesn't care, the media is warm ideologues as well. they see the world a certain way. they push a certain narrative for a lot of people. it's, it comes 1st thing with realizing that the media line to you, it's something small like, or one incident like this, like the written house case. and then you begin to question what also they lying about. and you know why, if you see evidence for yourself that contradicts the media narrative, you begin to wonder, you know, to look into other things that the media may be deceptive. and that is sort of as a shattering effect. and people really begin to wake up right now. it's been suggesting, ever since he was acquitted, tha

we spoke to journalist and political commentator chadwick moore, who believes freedom of speech in america is increasingly under attack. if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive? that's all subjective, that's the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, many people by medicine, they think it's the dog whistle for communism, for violence, things of this nature. what, that's where it can be asked to remove the mask. obviously there's also the other thing that this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt and us after because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's not, it's not directly probate or, or maybe what offends one person makes it other person laugh. and so we decide. censorship is a huge problem and this is the land that the 1st amendment is supposed to be the envy of the world throughout the west. and it's certainly under attack, we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech. and the 1st amendment to rein in corporations might be targeting.

new york journalist, a political commentator chadwick more telling us the media twisted the whole narrative of the story. the media had drummed up a lot of times try to make this into some kind of racial thing and come political thinks the media from day one. just look at the language reporting on this. you have people who are just reminded of, obviously poisoned by the media. the media doesn't care. the media is warm ideologues as well. they see the world a certain way. they push a certain narrative for a lot of people. it's, it comes 1st thing with realizing that the media line to you, it's something you know small like, or one incident like this, like the written house case. and then you get the question, what also the lying about. and you know why, if you see evidence to yourself that contradicts the media narrative, you begin to wonder, begin to look into other things of the media may be deceptive and that is sort of as a shattering effect. and people really begin to wake up right now. so been suggesting, ever since he was acquitted, that there is going to be a reckoning that he is goi

well, earlier we spoke with us journalist chadwick moore, who stated obscene legal deal with you free will it failed to absolve a defendant before. this is an agreement that jeffrey epstein settled with virginia robertson, 2009. she received $500000.00 to basically relinquish any sort of future responsibility into it specifically says the associate attorneys, employees, etc. now it doesn't name prince andrew affectively, but disagreement was used by alan dirty, which is a very famous lawyer here in united states to absolve him. so of a case that, that virginia roberts brought forth again, 70 brought up disagreement and the judge dismissed it. prince andrew is hoping this agreement will also absolve him, a being served by virginia roberts and tomorrow the judge in new york will decide whether or not the case can go forward. now, it's difficult, we don't really see all the document that's involved here. it's going to be really up to the judges discretion. this whole epstein saga has really exposed how the elite and how many will be parker people. the world have been protected for a long

t new york journalists and political commentator chadwick, moore told us the media twisted old narrative. the story the media had drummed up a lot of times try to make this into some kind of racial thing and some political thanks media from day one. this is the language that you're reporting on this. you have people who are just reminded of, obviously poisoned by the media. the media doesn't care. the media is warm ideologues as well. they see the world a certain way. they push a certain narrative for a lot of people. it's, it comes 1st thing with realizing that the media is line to you. it's something small like, or one incident like this, like the written house case. and then you begin to question what also the lying about. and you know why, if you see evidence for yourself, that contradicts the media narrative, you begin to wonder, begin to look into other things that the media may be deceptive and that is sort of as a shattering effect. and people really begin to wake up right now. it's been suggesting, ever since he was acquitted, that there is going to be a reckoning that he is goi

will earlier we spoke with us journalist chadwick, moore. you said that epstein legal deal with do free will it failed to absolve a defend defendant before this is an agreement that jeffrey epstein settled with virginia robertson, 2009. she received $500000.00 to basically relinquish any sort of future responsibility into it. specifically says epstein associates attorneys, employees, etc. now it doesn't name print then do affectively. but disagreement was used by allan dirt, who it was a very famous lawyer here in united states to absolve him. so of the case that, that virginia roberts brought forth a good 70 brought up disagreement and the judge dismissed it. prince andrew is hoping this agreement will also him a being sued by virginia roberts and tomorrow this judge in new york will decide whether or not the case can go forward. now, it's difficult, we don't really see all the document that's involved here. it's going to be really up to the judges discretion. this whole epstein saga has really exposed how beliefs and how may well be parker

will earlier we spoke with us journalist chadwick, moore, who said the epstein legal deal with jeffrey. well, it failed to absolve a defendant before this is an agreement that jeffrey epstein settled with virginia robertson, 2009. she received $500000.00 to basically relinquish any sort of future responsibility into it. specifically says the associate attorneys, employees, etc. now it doesn't name prince andrew affectively, but disagreement was used by allan durst, who it was a very famous lawyer here in united states to absolve himself about the case that, that virginia roberts brought forth to get 70 brought up disagreement. and the judge dismissed it. prince andrew is hoping this agreement will also absolve him, a being sued by virginia roberts and tomorrow the judge in new york will decide whether or not the case can go forward. now, it's difficult, we don't really see all the document that's involved here. it's going to be really up to the judges discretion. this whole epstein saga has really exposed how beliefs and how many will be parker people. the world have been protected for

new york. journalism police who commentator chadwick moore says that the media did twist the whole merits of, of this story. the media had drummed up a lot of times try to make this into some kind of racial thing and some political thinks the media from day one. just look at the language reporting on this. you have people who are just reminded of, obviously poisoned by the media. the media doesn't care. the media is warm ideologues as well. they see the world a certain way. they push a certain narrative for a lot of people. it's, it comes 1st thing with realizing that the media line to you, it's something you know small like, or one incident like this, like the written house case. and then you get the question, what also the lying about. and you know why, if you see evidence to yourself that contradicts the media narrative, you begin to wonder, begin to look into other things with the media may be deceptive and that is sort of as a shattering effect. and people really begin to wake up right now. it's been suggesting, ever since he was acquitted, that there is going to be a reckoning that

brandon, political commentator chadwick, moore told me he believes freedom of speech in the us is increasingly under attack . if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive? that's all subjective. that's of the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, many people by medicine did they get the dog whistle for communism for violence. the use of this nature, the word that's where it's gonna be asked to remove the mask. obviously there's also the other thing that this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt and he was master sweatshirt because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's not, it's not directly probate or, or, or maybe what offends one person makes it other person laugh. and so what, who is the side sensitivity that problem? and this is the land that, you know, the 1st amendment is supposed to be the envy of the world throughout the west. and it's certainly under attack, we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech. and the 1st amendment to rate in co

but as a commentator chadwick moore told me, he believes freedom of speech in the us is increasingly under attack. anyway, if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive? that's all subjective. that's of the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, many people by medicine, they think it's the dog whistle for communism, for violence, things of this nature. that's where it's gonna be asked to remove the mask. obviously there's also the other thing that this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt and he was master. or because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's not, it's not directly probate or, or, or maybe what offends one person makes it other person laugh. and so is decides to check with a huge problem in this is the land that, you know, the 1st amendment is supposed to be the envy of the world throughout the west. and it's certainly under attack. we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech, and the 1st amendment to rate in corporations mig

severely impacted and share with you another thoughts as to why this is happening in india right now. chadwick says, this is a serious sign of a dictator. it's heartless, disregarding the many people benefiting from the organizations. and then on video, we got this coming from rashid. here is rashid. if it means destroying serial society or economy of india or the prestige or india, the cancellation theories of jeremy are, are, are indian medical association or even support to literacy work. so be, it seems to be that you can the current in the g m a, you know, or t, well, what it needs means to be regulated so that your work is impacted. your child work is impacted. what does the ministry of home affairs need to do to adjust their approach to foreign funding coming into india's the question is that that is discrimination in the manner in which foreign investment in india has been. the discrimination between the hope is this is, is approached and also is this idea of the approach. and i think this discrimination has to stop. the business is managed by the finance ministry, whereas the civil so

let's bring a journalist, a political commentator chadwick lawyer. hey there. shadowing. thanks for your time today. it's not a nice world at times, never has been as it, but really the divide that this whole coven thing in the vaccine things brought up is really brought into the 4 of light, isn't it? yeah, it really has. let me, i wonder what would, if the left would say that i don't know if you were convicted felon high on that? no, you shouldn't be passing on a $20.00 bill because you might be in minnesota. this is a teachable moment. you're never hear of that. so you know that all of this kobe vaccination arguments and the sheet around it purely. what, of course, now, interesting language this california politician died. quote, a publication from coded were told sound a little bit like died risk coded, not from coded, as we know that those records all been trumped up across united states. democrats. people to the other places are now a meeting that hospital naturalization rates of employed by well over 50 percent. yeah, it is serious stuff. lots of people have lost, l

brandon. political commentator chadwick moore told us that he believes freedom of speech in the us is increasingly under attack. if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive, that's all subjective, that's of the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, many people by medicine, they think it's the dog whistle for communism, for violence. things of this nature was that person to be asked to remove their math. obviously not. there's also the other thing, this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt and he was master sweatshirt because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's not, it's not directly probate or, or, or maybe what offends one person makes it other person laugh. and so we decide to target the huge problem. and this is the land that, you know, the 1st amendment is supposed to be the envy of the world, the west, and it's certainly under attack. we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech. and the 1st amendment to rate in corporations might

that it all took off. political commentator chadwick more believes freedom of speech in the united states is increasingly under attack. if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive, that's all subjective. that's of the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, when people buy medicine, they think it's the dog whistle for communism, for violence. the use of this nature, the word that we're going to be asked to remove the mask. obviously not. there's also the other thing, this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt and he was master. or because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's not, it's not directly probate or, or maybe what offends one person makes it other person laugh. and so what is the side sensitivity, the huge problem, and this is the land that you know, the 1st amendments is supposed to be the envy of the world throughout the west. and it's certainly under attack. we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech, and the 1st amendment to rat

severely impacted and share with you another thoughts as to why this is happening in india right now . chadwick says this is a serious sign of a dictator. it's heartless, disregarding the many people benefiting from the organizations and then on video, we got this coming from rashid. here is rashid. if it means destroying civil society, or economy of india or the prestige or india, the cancellation theories of gum in the indian medical association, or even support to leprosy war. so be, it seems to be that you didn't of couldn't in the energy i mean, you know, to, well, what it needs means to be regulated so that your work is impacted. your child work is impacted. what does the ministry of home affairs need to do to adjust their approach to foreign funding? coming in to india's. the question is that that is discrimination in the manner in which foreign investment in india is being the discrimination is between. the hope is this is, is approached and also it was id the approach. and i think this discrimination has to stop. the business is managed by the finance ministry. where's the civil societ

early we spoke with us journalist chadwick moore. he says that seems legal deal with ju fray helps to absolve a defendant before this is an agreement that jeffrey epstein settled with virginia robertson, 2009. she received $500000.00 to basically relinquish any sort of future responsibility into it. specifically says the associate attorneys, employees, etc. now it doesn't, the name print then do affectively. but a disagreement was used by allan durst, who it was a very famous lawyer here in united states to absolve himself of a case that, that virginia roberts brought forth again, certainly brought up disagreement. and the judge dismissed it and was hoping this agreement will also absolve him. this judge in new york will decide whether or not the case can go forward. now, it's difficult, we don't really see all the documents. it's involved here. it's going to be really up to the judges discretion. this whole epstein saw guys really exposed how beliefs and how many will be our people. the world have been protected for a long time agai

anyway, history from then on political commented chadwick, more selling as he believes freedom of speech in the us is increasingly under its if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive. that's all subjective. that's of the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, when people buy medicine, they think it's the dog whistle for communism, for violence. things of this nature was that work can be asked to remove the mask. obviously not. there's also the other thing, this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt and he was after sweatshirt because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's not, it's not directly probate or, or maybe what offends one person makes it other person laugh. and so we decide. censorship is a huge problem and this is a land that, you know, the 1st amendment is supposed to be the envy of the world throughout the west. and it's certainly under attack. we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech, and the 1st amendment to rate in corpor

last year chadwick boseman was considered odds—on and anthony hopkins came in at the last moment to steal the trophy. so will smith is a heavy favourite for king richard but he takes nothing for granted. a lot of talk about kirsten stewart not being nominated despite being tipped for an oscar herself. what are the other surprises? this is what i mean! will smith and kirsten stewart were the heavy favourites and her performance as princess diana in spencer was not even included. the one film that seems to be running the table through award season is the power of the dog starring benedict cumberbatch and kirsten dunst. that is a dark drama about toxic masculinity in the old west and that has got three nominations at the screen actors guild. so has house of gucci, an actors favourite. lady gaga in there as well with jared leto. it's a wide—open award season. spring, summer, winter, fall, the only season that matters here in hollywood is award season and i love it! squid game makes history, the first foreign—language tv nominee. we've heard so much about squid game over the last 12 months

brandon. political commentator chadwick more believe freedom of speech in the us, increasingly under attack. it's a contract says you can't wear offensive clothing then what is offensive. that's all subjective. that's of the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, many people by medicine, they think it's the dog whistle for communism, for violence, things of this nature. that's where it can be asked to remove the mask. obviously, there's also the other things this man was also wearing a let's go brandon is what? sure. and you want that because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass mass. so it's not, it's not directly probate or amber or, or maybe what if any one person makes it other person laugh. and so we decide to target the huge problem. and this is the land that, you know, the 1st amendment is supposed to be the n b, the world throughout the west. and it's certainly under attack. we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech. and the 1st amendment to rate in corporations might be targeting p

but let's go commentator chadwick more believe freedom of speech in the us is increasingly i'm the attack. it's a contract says you can't wear offensive clothing then what is offensive. that's all subjective. that's of the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, many people by medicine, they think it's the dog whistle for communism, for violence, things of this nature. the word that work can be asked to remove the mask. obviously not. there's also the other thing, this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt and he was after sweatshirt because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's not, it's not directly probate or, or maybe what offends one person makes another person laugh. and so we decide sensitivity the huge problem. and this is a, the 1st amendment is supposed to be the envy of the world throughout the west. and it's certainly under attack, we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech. and the 1st amendment to rate in corporations might be targeting. people are harassing peop

brandon. political commentator chadwick more believes the freedom of speech in the united states is increasingly under attack. if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive, that's all subjective, that's of the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, many people by medicine, they think it's the dog whistle for communism, for violence, things of this nature. that's where it can be asked to remove the mask. obviously there's also the other thing that this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt and us after because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's not, it's not directly probate or, or, or maybe what offends one person makes it other person laugh. and so what is the side sensitivity, the huge problem, and this is the land that, you know, the 1st amendment just supposed to be the envy of the world throughout the west. and it's certainly under attack, we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech and the 1st amendment to rate in corporations who might be t

severely impacted and share with you another thoughts as to why this is happening in india right now . chadwick says this is a serious sign of a dictator. it's heartless, disregarding the many people benefiting from the organizations and then on video, we got this coming from rashid. here is rashid. if it means destroying civil society, or economy of india or the prestige or india, the cancellation theories of gum in the indian medical association, or even support to leprosy war. so be, it seems to be that you didn't of couldn't in the energy. and we, you know, to, well, what it needs means to be regulated so that your work is impacted. your child work is impacted. what does the ministry of home affairs need to do to adjust their approach to foreign funding? coming in to india's, the question is that that is discrimination in the manner in which foreign investment in india is being the discrimination is between the hope is this is, is approached and also is as id the approach. and i think this discrimination has to stop. the business is managed by the finance ministry. where's the civil society

severely impacted and share with you another thoughts as to why this is happening in india right now. chadwick says this is a serious sign of a dictator. it's heartless, disregarding the many people benefiting from the organizations. and then on video, we got this coming from rashid. here is a sheet. if it means destroying civil society, or economy of india or the prestige or soft or india, the cancellation fee, or is i've done a $1000000.00 or indian medical association or even support to leprosy work. so be, it seems to be the current energy and we, you know, to, well, what it means to be regulated so that your work is impacted. your child to work is impacting. what does the ministry of home affairs need to do to adjust their approach to foreign funding? coming in to india's. the question is that that is discrimination in the manner in which foreign investment in india is being done. discrimination is between the hope this is approached and also it was id the approach. and i think this discrimination has to stop. the business is managed by the finance ministry, whereas the civil society is m

brandon, political commentator chadwick mobily, freedom of speech in the us, is increasingly under attack. if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive? that's all subjective. that's of the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, many people by medicine, they think it's the dog with will for communism, for violence, things of this nature. the word that can be asked to remove them out. obviously, there's also the other thing, this man was also wearing a let's go brandon is what? sure. and you want that because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's not, it's not directly probate or, or maybe what offends one person makes it other person laugh. and so what is the side sensitivity, a huge problem, and this is the land that, you know, the 1st amendment is supposed to be the envy of the world throughout the west. and it's certainly under attack. we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech, and the 1st amendment to rate in corporations might be targeting. people a

brandon, political commentator chadwick more believe freedom of speech in the us is increasingly under a time. if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive? that's all subjective. that's of the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter mass, plenty of people by medicine, they think it's the dog whistle for communism, for violence, things of this nature would that work can be asked to remove the mask. obviously not. there's also the other thing, this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt and he was after sweatshirt because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's not directly probate or, or maybe what offends one person makes it other person laugh and we decide sensitivity. the huge problem in this is the land that, you know, the 1st of is supposed to be the envy of the world throughout the west. and it's certainly under attack, we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech. and the 1st amendment to rate in corporations might be targeting. people are hara

brandon. political commentator chadwick mobily, freedom of speech in the united states is increasingly under attack. if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive? that's all subjective, that's of the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, when people buy medicine, they think it's the dog whistle for communism, for violence, things of this nature. where is that, where it can be asked to remove the mask? obviously there's also the other thing that this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt. us. that because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's not, it's not directly probate or, or maybe what offends one person makes it other person laugh. and we decide censorship is a huge problem and this is the land that, you know, the 1st amendment is supposed to be of the world throughout the west. and it's certainly under attack. we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech, and the 1st amendment to rate in corporations might be targeting. people are har

the rest is history, political compensated chadwick. moore told me he believes freedom of speech in the us is increasingly under attack anyway. if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive? that's all subjective, that's the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, when people buy medicine, they think it's the dog whistle for communism, for violence. things of this nature was that where it's gonna be asked to remove the mask. obviously not. there's also the other thing that this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt and he was after sweatshirt because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's not, it's not directly probate or, or maybe what if any one person makes it other didn't last. and so what, who is the side? since a trip is a huge problem and this is the land that the 1st amendment is supposed to be. the envy of the world throughout the west, and it's certainly under attack. we don't have congress doing

the rest is history. political commentator chadwick moore told me he believed freedom of speech in the us either which way is increasingly under attack. if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive, that's all subjective, that's of the beholder. he makes the point that if someone wearing black lives matter math, when people buy medicine, they think it's a dog whistle for communism, for violence, things of this nature. that's where it's gonna be asked to remove the mask. obviously there's also the other thing that this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt and he was master because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked to replace the mass. so it's a direct probate or, or, or better, maybe what ends one person makes it other person land. so who's decide to check with a huge problem. this is the land that, you know, the 1st amendment is supposed to be the envy of the world throughout the west, and it's certainly under attack. we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech. and the 1st amendment to rate in corpora

last year chadwick roseman was considered odds—on and anthony hopkins came in at the last moment to steal the trophy. so will smith is a heavy favourite for making richard but he takes nothing for granted. aha, richard but he takes nothing for granted-— for granted. a lot of talk about kirsten _ for granted. a lot of talk about kirsten stewart i for granted. a lot of talkl about kirsten stewart not for granted. a lot of talk - about kirsten stewart not being nominated despite being tipped for an oscar herself. what are the other surprises? will for an oscar herself. what are the other surprises? will smith and kristin _ the other surprises? will smith and kristin stewart _ the other surprises? will smith and kristin stewart were - the other surprises? will smith and kristin stewart were the i and kristin stewart were the heavy favourites and her performance as princess diana income expense are not even included. the one film that seems to be running the table through award season is the power of the dog and that is a dark drama about toxic masculinity in the old west and that has got th

sue chadwick says my husband and i, in inverted, is, celebrated our70th birthday is that same week, just the two others, nobody could sing happy birthday to us. make it says i lost a brother, a sister and a marriage while partners were in full swing, he says borisjohnson has to be held accountable. —— mick says. there are many more in a very similar vein of people following rules, let me read one more from jez harris, my dad puts my birthday is the 21st of april, minus the 29th, his 76th in 2020 was his last, we could me to my parents' front drive, his birthday in the sunshine, mine in the rain, i couldn't even hug him. sebastian payne is the whitehall editor at the financial times. hello, just bring us up to date with your understanding about sue gray's report, when that might be released, vis—a—vis the investigation the metropolitan police are now carrying out? ,, , ._ , . , out? the sue gray inquiry which is not 'ust out? the sue gray inquiry which is notjust looking _ out? the sue gray inquiry which is notjust looking at _ out? the sue gray inquiry which is notjust looking at