this is epstein. it's her saying she been lured into a world of sexual abuse and she also had been abused by people around epstein and his closest confidantes. she talks about being abused by politicians and royalty who were not named in the document. she was paid about $500,000, about £371,000 by today's rates. in the document, the crucial bit says she releases and forever discharges, in the legal language, epstein and any other person or entity who could have been a defendant in the action she was bringing in florida, and in doing so that she agrees not to bring any damages claim against anyone from the beginning of time effectively up until the day of that settlement. now the reason why this is important is because the prince's lawyers are going to go into court tomorrow in new york and say the plain language in this document makes clear that even though we say her allegations against the duke of york are baseless, she can't even try to bring them because she has effectively signed away her rights

even the judge overseeing epstein's case demanded answers. one open question among others is whether the investigations reference, neural at all include the incident at the metropolitan correctional center involving mr. epstein on or about july, the 23rd, 2019 to my knowledge. it has never been definitely explained what the federal bureau of prisons concluded about the incident. an internal report concluded that the self mutilation charge was warranted book at theme died before an executive decision could be made. so in the absence of any inquiry into july 23rd aside from medical expertise detailing epstein's high spirits. the question to the american justice system is this, why was the report dotted and will concrete answers that have as yet proved elusive, ever be uncovered? people are going to need answers. i think there are things that a lot of the public wants answers to. but because from the very beginning, the epstein the death and, and some of the questions, the loop holes, you know, what happened with these guards? what happened with

epstein paid her $500,000. she agreed not to sue other potential defendants associated with epstein's settlement in the future. >> virginia giuffre had alleged in that lawsuit that she was trafficked by jeffrey epstein and exploited by some of his male friends. and included in that category, she did not name names, but she included businesspeople and politicians and royalty. >> reporter: attorneys for the duke of york argue that epstein's settlement with giuffre, now 38, should prevent the prince from being sued. the prince's legal team previously sought to get the case tossed out on jurisdictional grounds. >> the claim that virginia giuffre cannot sue prince andrew based on jurisdiction, specifically, that she's lived in australia for the last 17 of 19 years, is going to, for lack of a better term, fall flat on its face. so that claim, more likely than not, is going to be thrown out. >> reporter: giuffre claims she was trafficked for sex by epstein and maxwell, found guilty last week for separate trafficking c

even the judge overseeing epstein's case demanded answers. one open question among others is whether the investigations reference in your letter will include the incident at the metropolitan correctional center involving mr. epstein on or about july, the 23rd, 2019 to my knowledge. it has never been definitely explained what the federal bureau of prisons concluded about the incident. an internal report concluded that the self mutilation charge was warranted book at theme died before an executive decision could be made. so in the absence of any inquiry into july 23rd aside from medical expertise detailing epstein's high spirits the question to the american justice system. is this, why was the report doctored and will concrete answers that have as yet proved elusive, ever be uncovered? people are going to need answers. i think there are things that a lot of the public wants answers to. but because from the very beginning, the epstein the death and, and some of the questions, the loop holes. you know, what happened with these guards? what happen

just hours after epstein was found semi conscious on his cell floor, however, epstein version of events is completely redacted from any records. what's more, the report was amended exactly one week later to include the cause of the but suicide as self mutilation. a direct contradiction of the initial report which explicitly states no instances of self harm were found. epstein for his troubles was charged with violating prison rules and placed on suicide watch. if only for one day. at the was pending a code 228, tattooing or self mutilation. and i spoke with who indicates that most likely he will be found competent because he is not mentally ill pending a disciplinary process which didn't call a single witness. not even epstein cellmate, the disgrace financier was banned up in solitary confinement and subjected to several psychological assessments. the general consensus was one of a picture of optimism who denied any suicidal thoughts, a tool that is in stark contrast to later prism reports painting epstein as a solemn prisoner with a poor attitude intent on taking his own life confused

even the judge overseeing epstein's case demanded answers. one open question among others is whether the investigations reference in your letter will include the incident at the metropolitan correctional center involving mr. epstein on or about july, the 23rd, 2019 to my knowledge. it has never been definitely explained what the federal bureau of prisons concluded about the incident. an internal report concluded that the self mutilation charge was warranted book at theme died before an executive decision could be made. so in the absence of any inquiry into july 23rd aside from medical expertise detailing epstein's high spirits. the question to the american justice system is this, why was the report dotted and will concrete answers that have as yet proved elusive, ever be uncovered? people are going to need answers. i think there are things that a lot of the public wants answers to. but because from the very beginning, the epstein the death and, and some of the questions, the loop holes, you know, what happened with the guard. what happened wi

not even epstein sell me. the disgrace financier was banned up in solitary confinement and subjected to several psychological assessments. the general consensus was one of a picture of optimism who denied any suicidal thoughts, a tool that is in stark contrast to later prism reports painting epstein as a solemn prisoner with a poor attitude intent on taking his own life confused well, you'd be forgiven. even the judge overseeing epstein's case demanded answers. one open question among others is whether the investigations reference in your letter will include the incident at the metropolitan correctional center involving mr. epstein on or about july, the 23rd, 2019 to my knowledge. it has never been definitely explained what the federal bureau of prisons concluded about the incident. an internal report concluded that the self mutilation charge was warranted book at theme died before an executive decision could be made. so in the absence of any inquiry into july 23rd aside from medical expertise detailing epstei

even the judge overseeing epstein's case demanded answers. one open question among others is whether the investigations reference in your letter will include the incident at the metropolitan correctional center involving mr. epstein on or about july, the 23rd, 2019 to my knowledge. it has never been definitely explained what the federal bureau of prisons concluded about the incident. an internal report concluded that the self mutilation charge was warranted book epstein died before an executive decision could be made. so in the absence of any inquiry into july 23rd aside from medical expertise detailing epstein's high spirits. the question to the american justice system is this, why was the report dotted and will concrete answers that have as yet proved elusive, ever be uncovered? people are going to need answers. i think there are things that a lot of the public wants answers to. but because from the very beginning, the epstein the death and, and some of the questions, the loop holes. you know, what happened with these guards? what happened

even the judge overseeing epstein's case demanded answers. one open question among others is whether the investigations reference in your letter will include the incident at the metropolitan correctional center involving mr. epstein on or about july, the 23rd, 2019 to my knowledge. it has never been definitely explained what the federal bureau of prisons concluded about the incident. an internal report concluded that the self mutilation charge was warranted book at theme died before an executive decision could be made. so in the absence of any inquiry into july 23rd aside from medical expertise detailing epstein's high spirits. the question to the american justice system is this, why was the report dotted and will concrete answers that have as yet proved elusive, ever be uncovered? people are going to need answers. i think there are things that a lot of the public wants answers to. but because from the very beginning, the epstein the death and, and some of the questions, the loop holes, you know, what happened with these guards? what happened

even the judge overseeing epstein's case demanded answers. one open question among others, is whether the investigations reference in your letter will include the incident at the metropolitan correctional center involving mr. epstein on or about july, the 23rd, 2019 to my knowledge. it has never been definitely explained what the federal bureau of prisons concluded about the incident. an internal report concluded that the self mutilation charge was warranted book at theme died before an executive decision could be made. so in the absence of any inquiry into july 23rd aside from medical expertise detailing epstein's high spirits the question to the american justice system. is this, why was the report doctored and will concrete answers that have as yet proved elusive, ever be uncovered? people are going to need answers. i think there are things that a lot of the public wants answers to. but because from the very beginning, the epstein the death and, and some of the questions, the loop holes, you know, what happened with these guards? what happe

epstein paid her virginia giuffre $1 million. it released everybody else from further legal challenge. prince of andrew's lawyers need to persuade the judge that the 2009 deal covered the prince. it is unquestionable that prince andrew could have been sued in the 2009 florida action but was not. he was a potential defendant. the prince's lawyers demanded details of the allegation but were slapped down by the judge. that is not a dog that is going to hunt here, he said. questions were raised as to whether the prince could use the 2009 deal. he is a third party. the judge said the only people who could and foresight jeffrey epstein and virginia giuffre. >> the argument put forward by virginia giuffre's counsel were strong. that the arguments put forward by prince andrew's counsel really met with a hot edge. the set that the judge was not buying what they were selling. >> even if this case is dismissed, the prince is badly damaged. >> the monarchy is an stitution big enough to rise above what has happened, but when it comes to princ

even the judge overseeing epstein's case demanded answers. one open question among others, is whether the investigations reference in your letter will include the incident at the metropolitan correctional center involving mr. epstein on or about july, the 23rd, 2019 to my knowledge. it has never been definitely explained what the federal bureau of prisons concluded about the incident. an internal report concluded that the self mutilation charge was warranted book at theme died before an executive decision could be made. so in the absence of any inquiry into july 25th aside from medical expertise detailing epstein's high spirits. the question to the american justice system is this, why was the report dotted and will concrete and says that have as yet proved elusive ever be on cove? it people are going to need answers. i think there are things that a lot of the public wants answers to. but because from the very beginning, the epstein the death and some of the questions, the loop holes. you know, what happened with the guard? what happened with

just hours after epstein was found semi conscious on his cell floor, however, epstein version of events is completely redacted from any records. what's more, the report was amended exactly one week later to include the cause of the but suicide as self mutilation. a direct contradiction of the initial report which explicitly states no instances of self harm were found. epstein for his troubles was charged with violating prison rules and placed on suicide watch. if only for one day. that's the use pending a code to, to 8 tattooing or self mutilation. and i spoke with who indicates that most likely he will be found competent because he is not mentally ill pending a disciplinary process which didn't call a single witness. not even epstein cellmate, the disgrace financier was banged up in solitary confinement and subjected to several psychological assessments. the general consensus was one of a picture of optimism who denied any suicidal thoughts, a tool that is in stark contrast to later prism reports painting epstein as a solemn prisoner with a poor attitude intent on taking his own life c

the jeffrey epstein has taken a new turn off. he has seen us federal documents showing the reports of 1st suited them with heavenly redacted, with his own accounts of the incident. entirely blind thoughts with more details. his donny armstrong, the life and death of jeffrey epstein, billionaire and prolific peter file as a subject mired in mystery and manipulation. the official account of his apparent suicide while held in a notorious new york lock up on charges of child sex trafficking, will seemingly be forever murky with regard to his adjustment to a correctional setting. mr. epstein receive one incident report, one federal bureau, prison, custody for self mutilation. on july the 23rd, 2019. as of august, the 15th 2019, the incident report has been expunged, though it is in clear why it has been expunged. and whether mr. epstein knew this, so what exactly happened on july 23rd? a patchy paper trail provides more questions than answers. for instance, a doctor's report, officially logged and attempted suicide by asphyxiation. ju

just hours after epstein was found semi conscious on his cell floor, however, epstein's version of events is completely redacted from any records. what's more, the report was amended exactly one week later to include the cause of the but suicide as self mutilation. a direct contradiction of the initial report which explicitly states no instances of self harm were found. epstein for his troubles was charged with violating prison rules and placed on suicide watch. if only for one day. that's the use pending a code to, to 8 tattooing or self mutilation. and i spoke with who indicates that most likely he will be found competent because he is not mentally ill pending a disciplinary process which didn't call a single witness. not even epstein cellmate the disgrace, fine and sir was banged up in solitary confinement and subjected to several psychological assessments. the general consensus was one of a picture of optimism who denied any suicidal thoughts at all. that's in stark contrast to later prism reports painting epstein as a solemn prisoner with a poor attitude intent on taking his own life

the jeffrey epstein is taken a new turn. c, a u. s. federal documents showing the report of his 1st thought. it was heavily redacted with his own accounts of the incident entirely blinds out with more details. his dunney armstrong, the life and death of jeffrey epstein, billionaire and prolific peter file as a subject mired in mystery and manipulation. the official account of his apparent suicide while held in a notorious new york lock up on charges of child sex trafficking, will seemingly be forever murky with regard to his adjustment to a correctional setting. mr. epstein received one incident report, one and federal bureau, prison custody for self mutilation. on july the 23rd, 2019. as of august, the 15th 2019 incident report has been expunged, though it is in clear why it has been expunged, and whether mr. epstein knew this. so what exactly happened on july 23rd? a patchy paper trail provides more questions than answers. for instance, a doctor's report, officially logged and attempted suicide by asphyxiation, just hours after epste

specifically says epstein associates attorneys, employees, etc. now it doesn't name print then do affectively. but disagreement was used by allan dirt, who it was a very famous lawyer here in united states to absolve him. so of the case that, that virginia roberts brought forth a good 70 brought up disagreement and the judge dismissed it. prince andrew is hoping this agreement will also him a being sued by virginia roberts and tomorrow this judge in new york will decide whether or not the case can go forward. now, it's difficult, we don't really see all the document that's involved here. it's going to be really up to the judges discretion. this whole epstein saga has really exposed how beliefs and how may well be parker people. the world have been protected for a long time against things like this. i've done this done remains on the brink of a humanitarian disaster, millions of faith and starve ation. as winter temperatures plummets and the country's economy is on its knees shrinking by almost half in recent months, left them as haste, the u. s. m

i see a jeffrey epstein has taken a new turn. all tea has seen us federal documents, so in the report of his 1st suicide attempt was heavily redacted with his own account of the incident, entirely blanked out. with more details, he is donny armstrong, the life and death of jeffrey epstein, billionaire and prolific peter file is a subject mired in mystery and manipulation. the official account of his apparent suicide while held in a notorious new york lock up on charges of child sex trafficking, will seemingly be forever murky with regard to his adjustment to a correctional setting, mister epstein received one incident report, one federal bureau, prison, custody for self mutilation on july the 23rd, 2019. as of august, the 15th 2019, the incident report has been expunged, though. it is in clear why it has been expunged, and whether mr. epstein knew this. so what exactly happened on july 23rd? a patchy paper trail provides more questions than answers. for instance, a doctor's report, officially logged and attempted suicide by asphy

even the judge overseeing epstein's case demanded answers. one open question among others is whether the investigations reference your letter will include the incident at the metropolitan correctional center involving mr. epstein on or about july, the 23rd, 2019 to my knowledge. it is never been definitely explained what the federal bureau of prisons concluded about the incident. an internal report concluded that the self mutilation charge was warranted book at theme died before an executive decision could be made. so in the absence of any inquiry into july 25th, aside from the medical expertise detailing epstein's high spirits, the question to the american justice system is this. why was the report dotted and will concrete and says that have as yet proved elusive ever be on cove? it people are going to need answers. i think there are things that a lot of the public wants answers to. but because from the very beginning, the epstein the death and some of the questions, the loop holes, you know, what happened with the guard? what happened with

even the judge overseeing epstein's case demanded answers. one open question among others is whether the investigations reference in your letter will include the incident at the metropolitan correctional center involving mr. epstein on or about july, the 23rd, 2019 to my knowledge. it has never been definitely explained what the federal bureau of prisons concluded about the incident. an internal report concluded that the self mutilation charge was warranted book at theme died before an executive decision could be made. so in the absence of any inquiry into july 23rd aside from medical expertise detailing epstein's high spirits. the question to the american justice system. is this, why was the report dotted and will concrete answers that have as yet proved elusive ever be on cove? it people are going to need answers. i think there are things that a lot of the public wants answers to. but because from the very beginning, the epstein the death and some of the questions, the loop holes. you know, what happened with the guard? what happened with t

even the judge overseeing epstein's case demanded answers. one open question among others, is whether the investigations reference in your letter will include the incident at the metropolitan correctional center involving mr. epstein on or about july, the 23rd, 2019 to my knowledge. it has never been definitely explained what the federal bureau of prisons concluded about the incident. an internal report concluded that the self mutilation charge was warranted book at theme died before an executive decision could be made. so in the absence of any inquiry into july 25th, aside from medical expertise detailing epstein's high spirits. the question to the american justice system. is this, why was the report dotted and will concrete answers that have as yet proved elusive ever be on cove? it people are going to need answers. i think there are things that a lot of the public wants answers to. but because from the very beginning, the epstein the death and, and some of the questions, the loop holes, you know, what happened with these guards? what happe

constitute conviction of jeffrey epstein's madam be thrown out? >> this is an absolute nightmare situation for any prosecutor. >> her lawyers calling for a new trial after a juror's shocking revelation. it's the latest twist in the saga which also includes prince andrew's civil case that has the british royal family on the defensive. >> your royal highness -- >> why the queen's second son has been banished from public life. >>> plus bob saget's legacy. his widow kelly rizzo's heartbreak, remembering the love of his life. >> he just wanted to spread love and laughter, and he did it so amazingly. >> how the comic faces his own tragedies. >> he lost his sisters, he lost his parents. >> what she now wants the world to know about her husband. >>> and "encanto." ♪ we don't talk about you no no ♪ >> with the hit song "we don't talk about bruno," the sensation overtaking hip-hop and overtaking the pop charts. if i go to sleep right now, i can get more.... four hours. that's not good. what is time? time. time is just a construct. construct. constructio

in 2009 included an agreement that ms giuffre wouldn't sue anyone connected to epstein. the agreement was made public on monday and lawyers for prince andrew say it releases the prince from liability in the civil case brought by virginia giuffre, who accuses him of sexually assaulting her when she was 17. prince andrew has consistently denied the claims. our legal correspondent dominic casciani reports. a woman seeking her day in court. the unprecedented defendant — a prince of the realm. but have his lawyers now found a way to stop virginia giuffre�*s case from ever being heard? she says she was trafficked into sexual abuse and exploited by the man on the right, jeffrey epstein. ms giuffre, then known as roberts, says epstein and his girlfriend coerced the then—teenager into abuse by prince andrew in london, new york and the caribbean. today, the release of a 12—year—old settlement in which ms giuffre, seen here at court in new york, accepted $500,000 to end her original case against epstein. that confidential deal has been made public because of its potential

we have lawyers who are representing alleged victims of epstein saying this is vague. we have those who would support prince andrew parliament perspective, saying this pretty much carries —— couple of everything. much carries -- couple of everything-— much carries -- couple of everything. much carries -- couple of eve hina. . ., everything. what would you say? thank ou everything. what would you say? thank you for— everything. what would you say? thank you for having _ everything. what would you say? thank you for having me. - everything. what would you say? thank you for having me. i - thank you for having me. i appreciate the opportunity to weigh in on this important case. in my view, generally settlement agreements would broad releases of liability are enforceable. the question, the real issue in this case, though, is going to be whether prince andrew and other potential defendants are considered intended third beneficiaries. thejudge considered intended third beneficiaries. the judge will look at all the facts that are available to be able to determine the

the closely followed settlement between deceased convicted sex offender, jeffrey epstein, and his accuser, virginia to free has been made public that the head of a critical hearing involving the british royal families, prince andrew also ahead 19 years had months and $25.00 days on this is american legacy, he looked back at one of the defining moments of last year, us withdrawal from afghanistan, which brought the country to the brink of collapse with just gone 3. i'm here in moscow york in arts international. my name is peter scott . thanks for joining. covey cases have searched in the united states with the weekly average, surpassing 360000. throughout the pandemic, the world health organization, and stress, the only way forward is 3 must vaccination and one knock on effects of that big profits. the big pharma, 3 companies, pfizer, beyond tech and modernity between them have reported the rates in over $90000000.00 a day. is ortiz saskia taylor 2021 beer we discovered that reading no cure for greed. just off, big pharma, pfizer is forecasting $15000000000.00 in revenue from its covert va

, nowjeffrey jeffrey epstein, now jeffrey epstein�*s jeffrey epstein, nowjeffrey epstein�*s estate, or virginia giuffre, that that agreement would include prince andrew. they say he has never been named in that agreement and that the claims in that case really revolve around those who would have trafficked young girls alongsidejeffrey young girls alongside jeffrey epstein. young girls alongsidejeffrey epstein. they say the claims they have now against prince andrew, which he strongly denies, is that he abused the girls that were trafficked by epstein, that he himself did not engage in any trafficking or transporting of underage girls, allegedly. so they claim the settlement is completely different and not relevant in this case. thejudge has been questioning both sides and we willjust have to see which interpretation the judge agrees with. band see which interpretation the “udge g with.— agrees with. and this really is a hu . e agrees with. and this really is a huge moment. _ agrees with. and this really is a huge moment, isn't— agrees with. and this really is a huge moment, isn't

c shed -- she said she was exploited by jeffrey epstein. ms. giuffre, then known as roberts, says epstein and his girlfriend coerced the teenager into abuse by prince andrew in london, new york, and the caribbean. today the release of a 12-year-old settlement in which ms. giuffre accepted .5 million dollars to end her case against epstein. that case has been made public because of its potential importance to prince andrew's defense. virginia giuffre agreed to release, acquit, and forever discharge epstein from further claims. the wording goes on to cover any other person who could have been a potential defendant. she promises not to bring any further case dating from the beginning of the world. prince andrew's lawyers say that means he can't be sued, but one lawyer who has represented some of epstein's alleged victims says it is too vague to be enforceable. >> this is one of the most bizarre pieces of a settlement agreement i have ever seen. i cannot believe a court would say, anyone who has wronged virgia who was associated with epstein is now

this is an agreement that jeffrey epstein settled with virginia robertson, 2009. she received $500000.00 to basically relinquish any sort of future responsibility into it specifically says the associate attorneys, employees, etc. now it doesn't name prince andrew affectively, but disagreement was used by alan dirty, which is a very famous lawyer here in united states to absolve him. so of a case that, that virginia roberts brought forth again, 70 brought up disagreement and the judge dismissed it. prince andrew is hoping this agreement will also absolve him, a being served by virginia roberts and tomorrow the judge in new york will decide whether or not the case can go forward. now, it's difficult, we don't really see all the document that's involved here. it's going to be really up to the judges discretion. this whole epstein saga has really exposed how the elite and how many will be parker people. the world have been protected for a long time against things like this still ahead in the program by major. well, how it says made a joint statement bargain to prevent

although this was not _ epstein for him to abuse. although this was not made _ epstein for him to abuse. although this was not made clear _ epstein for him to abuse. although this was not made clear on - epstein for him to abuse. although this was not made clear on air, i epstein for him to abuse. although | this was not made clear on air, alan dershowitz used to be a lawyer for jeffrey epstein and as he mentioned he has been accused of abuse by virginia, a charge he denies. many viewers expressed shock at the interview. what an amazing lapse in thejudgement that not the following day the bbc acknowledge that those criticisms had a point putting out this statement. last night's interview did not lead to the editorial standards as he was not a suitable person to interview as an impartial analyst and we did not make the relevant but as background clear to our audience. we will look into how this happened. there has been no further word yet on that but in the meantime there have been more objections to another bbc interview about this c

the closely followed settlement between defeats convicted, sex offender, jeffrey epstein and his accuser, virginia you free has been made public. that's the head of a critical hearing involving the british royal family, prince andrew, also ahead. 19 years head months and 25 days on. this is america's legacy. r. c. looks back as one of the defining moment of last year. u. s. withdraw from afghanistan, which brought the config to the brink of collapse with it just on 2 o'clock here in moscow, you're watching art international. my name is peter scott. thank you for joining covey cases, have searched in the united states with the weekly average, surpassing 360000. throughout the pandemic, the world health organization has dressed. the only way forward is to buy must vaccination, and one knock on effects of that big profits for big pharma. 3 companies, pfizer buy on take a madonna between them, reports and they've been raking in over $90000000.00 a day. is our t saskia? taylor 2021 beer we discovered does ready no cure for greed. just off big pharma, pfizer is forecasting $15000000000.00 in r

, in 2009 included an agreement that ms giuffre wouldn't sue anyone connected to epstein. the agreement was made public on monday and lawyers for prince andrew say it releases the prince from liability in the civil case brought by virginia giuffre, who accuses him of sexually assaulting her when she was 17. prince andrew has consistently denied the claims. our legal correspondent dominic casciani reports. a woman seeking her day in court. the unprecedented defendant — a prince of the realm. but have his lawyers now found a way to stop virginia giuffre's case from ever being heard? she says she was trafficked into sexual abuse and exploited by the man on the right, jeffrey epstein. ms giuffre, then known as roberts, says epstein and his girlfriend coerced the then—teenager into abuse by prince andrew in london, new york and the caribbean. today, the release of a 12—year—old settlement in which ms giuffre, seen here at court in new york, accepted $500,000 to end her original case against epstein. that confidential deal has been made public because of its potential im

epstein paid virginia guiffre $500,000. their deal released any other person who could have been included as a potential defendant from further legal challenge by virginia guiffre. prince andrew's lawyers needed to persuade the judge that the 2009 deal covered the prince. the court heard... the prince's lawyers demanded detail of the allegations against their client but they were slapped down by thejudge. finally, questions were raised as to whether the prince could even use the 2009 deal. he is a third party, the court heard. thejudge said... the argument put forward by ms giuffre roberts' counsel, david boies, was strong. i thought the arguments put forward by prince andrew's counsel really met with what we call in america a "very hot bench." the judge was simply not buying what they were selling. even if this case is dismissed, the prince is, say veteran royal watchers, badly damaged. when it comes to the monarchy, the monarchy is obviously an institution that is big enough to rise above what has happened, but when it co

a closely followed settlement between the seas convicted, sex offender, jeffrey epstein on his accuser. virginia jeffrey has been made public about the head of a critical hearing involving the british royal families, prince, and 19 years had months and 25 days on, which is a very good legacy r t looked back at one of the defining moments of last year. the u. s. withdrawal from afghanistan, which brought the country to the brink of collapse with dr. 1 in the morning in nairobi in do her on here in moscow this tuesday, january the 4th. welcome to the news. our on our t. cobit cases have surged in the united states with the weekly average, surpassing 360000. throughout the pandemic, the world health organization, her stress, the only way forward is through loss vaccination. on one knock on effect of that big profits for big pharma, 3 companies fi shot by on tech, and the journey between them have reportedly been raking in over $90000000.00 every day. here's our teeth. sa scheduler, 2021 beer. we discovered that ready? no cure for greed, just off big pharma, pfizer is forecasting $15000000

she did settle with mr epstein. and _ with mr epstein. she did settle with mr epstein, and she _ with mr epstein. she did settle with mr epstein, and she has _ with mr epstein. she did settle with mr epstein, and she has not - mr epstein, and she has not indicated yet that she will require prince andrew to go to trial. so the door is still open for settlement talks. as well, prince andrew could file a motion for re—judgment, which is a renewed judgment where all the facts come in to have the judge determined that the facts do not meet the standard required under american law. 50 meet the standard required under american law— american law. so grateful for you settin: american law. so grateful for you setting that _ american law. so grateful for you setting that out _ american law. so grateful for you setting that out so _ american law. so grateful for you setting that out so clearly - american law. so grateful for you setting that out so clearly for - american law. so grateful for you setting that out so clearly for us. | setting that

included an agreement that ms giuffre wouldn't sue anyone connected to epstein. lawyers for prince andrew say the agreement, which has been made public in the last couple of hours, releases the prince from liability in the civil case brought by virginia giuffre, who accuses him of sexually assaulting her when she was 17. prince andrew has consistently denied the claims. our legal correspondent, dominic casciani, reports. a woman seeking her day in court. the unprecedented defendant — a prince of the realm. but have his lawyers now found a way to stop virginia giuffre�*s case from ever being heard? she says she was trafficked into sexual abuse and exploited by the man on the right, jeffrey epstein. ms giuffre, then known as roberts, says epstein and his girlfriend coerced the teenager into abuse by prince andrew in london, new york and the caribbean. today, the release of a 12—year—old settlement in which ms giuffre, seen here at court in new york, accepted half $1 million to end her original case against epstein. that confidential deal has been made publi

she says she was sexually exploited by the man on the right, jeffrey epstein. ms giuffre, then known as roberts, said epstein coerced the then teenager into abuse by prince andrew. alleged events 20 years ago, but today's new york hearing focuses on the 2009 legal document. back then, ms giuffre, seen here at court in new york, accepted $500,000 to end her original case against epstein. in the settlement, virginia giuffre agreed to release, acquit, satisfy, and forever discharge epstein from further claims. the wording goes on to cover any other person who could have been a potential defendant. it's so wide, she promises not to bring any further case dating from the beginning of the world. prince andrew's lawyers say that means he can't be sued. but one lawyer who's represented some of epstein�*s alleged victims says it's too vague to be enforceable. this is one of the most bizarre pieces of a settlement agreement i have ever seen. i just cannot believe that a court would say, well, anyone who has wronged virginia, who was associated with epstein, is now rele

she's been accused of sex trafficking, young girls for jeffrey epstein. and at this point, her defense is arguing that she may receive a lesser sentence if she comes forward and names names about who participated with jeffrey epstein. in his activities, if she were to come forward and give that information. now, virginia roberts to fray has accused prince andrew of having sex with her. when she was 17 years old, she claimed she was forced to have sex with prince andrew. now, prince andrew denied these allegations you fray has also filed a lawsuit against an american lawyer and a harvard professor who denies any wrong doings. prince andrew also denies these wrong doings, so we shall see what the judge decides. 8 as to whether or not these court proceedings will continue, but the jeffrey epstein case and his subsequent death. and now the conviction of going maxwell, i has raised a lot of questions. many are looking on this case with a lot of interest in what revelations could be coming down the pike. our teeth kill him up and taken us through the thanksgivi

that isjeffrey epstein and ghislaine maxwell, who was clearly a friend. andrew brought ghislaine maxwell and jeffrey epstein to windsor, to balmoral and so on. i think this has done, whatever the outcome, considerable damage to his reputation. if the case is dismissed, i suspect that many people would feel he's kind of emerged on a technicality. i think it would be difficult for him to find a route back to public life. we know, for example, that many of the military regiments and other organisations with which he's associated really don't want to have anything more to do with him. that is the reality. omicron cases are continuing to surge in the us and parts of europe. millions of pupils across england and northern ireland are going back to school this week. in england, secondary school students will have to take tests on—site before they return to the classroom, and masks are being re—introduced. our correspondent jayne mccubbin reports. bell rings this is bethany. this is kian. and this is what the start of a new term in england looks like. how was

although this was not made clear on air, alan dershowitz used to be a lawyer forjeffrey epstein, and as he mentioned there, he has, along with epstein, been accused of abuse by virginia giuffre, a charge he denies. many viewers expressed shock at the interview, with michael mcelfresh contacting us to say: and john moyes added: well, the following day, the bbc acknowledged that those criticisms had a point, putting out this statement. there has been no further word yet on that, but in the meantime they have been more objections to another bbc interview about this case, and it took place on new year's eve on radio 4's today programme, and clips of it were shown during the day on the news channel. the guest: ghislaine maxwell's brother ian, who challenged the version of events set out in court by her accusers.

. >>> today, a hearing may resolve the latest turn in the jeffrey epstein sex trafficking saga. we could find out whether a lawsuit claiming britain's prince andrew raped a woman when she was a teenager will be thrown out. this morning a secret settlement between jeffrey epstein and one of his accusers has been revealed, just hours before a critical hearing in the sexual abuse lawsuit filed against britain's prince andrew, andrew's accuser, virginia giuffre claims she was one of his sex trafficking victims. she accuses the royal of having sex with her on several occasions beginning when she was 17, which the royal denies. >> i've said consistently and frequently that we never had any sort of sexual contact. >> on monday, a judge released unsealed documents, showing giuffre agreed to end a previous lawsuit against epstein, settling for $500,000 and agreeing she would not sue anyone who could be identified as a potential defendant in the case. in that 2009 lawsuit, giuffre claimed she was forced into sexual contact with epstein's associates including royalty, academics and busines

previously with jeffrey epstein. and i— settled previously with jeffrey epstein, and i think— settled previously with jeffrey epstein, and i think she - settled previously with jeffreyj epstein, and i think she wants settled previously with jeffrey i epstein, and i think she wants to settled previously with jeffrey - epstein, and i think she wants to go forward _ epstein, and i think she wants to go forward she — epstein, and i think she wants to go forward. she want _ epstein, and i think she wants to go forward. she want to _ epstein, and i think she wants to go forward. she want to have - epstein, and i think she wants to go forward. she want to have her- epstein, and i think she wants to go forward. she want to have her day l epstein, and i think she wants to go| forward. she want to have her day in court _ forward. she want to have her day in court and _ forward. she want to have her day in court and an— forward. she want to have her day in court. and an apology _ forward. she want to have her day in court. and an apology from - forward. she want to have her day in court. and

included an agreement that ms giuffre wouldn't sue anyone connected to epstein. lawyers for prince andrew say the agreement, which has been made public in the last couple of hours, releases the prince from liability in the civil case brought by virginia giuffre, who accuses him of sexually assaulting her when she was 17. prince andrew has consistently denied the claims. our legal correspondent, dominic casciani, reports. a woman seeking her day in court. the unprecedented defendant — a prince of the realm. but have his lawyers now found a way to stop virginia giuffre�*s case from ever being heard? she say she was trafficked for sexual abuse and exploited she says she was trafficked for sexual abuse and exploited by the man on the right, jeffrey epstein. ms giuffre, then known as roberts, says epstein and his girlfriend coerced the teenager into abuse by prince andrew in london, new york and the caribbean. today, the release of a 12—year—old settlement in which ms giuffre, seen here at court in new york, accepted half $1 million to end her original case ag

epstein-— jeffrey epstein. and then what happened? — jeffrey epstein. and then what happened? we _ jeffrey epstein. and then what happened? we spoke. - jeffrey epstein. and then what happened? we spoke. we i jeffrey epstein. and then what i happened? we spoke. we ordered drinks. we talked _ happened? we spoke. we ordered drinks. we talked for— happened? we spoke. we ordered drinks. we talked for a _ happened? we spoke. we ordered drinks. we talked for a few - happened? we spoke. we ordered i drinks. we talked for a few minutes. it wasn't soon after that someone from the hotel came to our table and let them know the room was ready. i was a little bit confused because although i had just met her, it was my understanding that they lived close by. i was a little bit taken aback that they would be staying in and hotel so close to their home. when i asked that question they explained there were renovations going on at the residence. and they could not be there during renovations and say they were staying at a loc

there was no admission of liability from epstein. it adds that the document is a general release by virginia giuffre for any other personal entity who could have been included as a potential defendant for all legal actions including lawsuits, both state-level and federal level. the agreement was overseen by the laws of frida, where it was signed by ms. giuffre, who gave her address is being new south wales, australia. the bbc's legal correspondent came into the studio and explained to ben brown what the document said. >> this is a 12-page document signed in november 2009 which seems a whole world away, but the allegations of virginia giuffre against jeffrey epstein and people around him including prince andrew date back 20 years. she was suing him in a cot in florida -- epstein -- saying she had been lured into a world of sexual abuse and had been accused by people around epstein, his closest confidants, she talks about being abused by politicians and royalty, but they are not named in the document. when she settled the case, paid $5

included an agreement that ms giuffrre wouldn't sue anyone connected to epstein. lawyers for prince andrew say the agreement, which has been made public in the last couple of hours, releases the prince from liability in the civil case brought by virginia giuffre, who accuses him of sexually assaulting her when she was 17. prince andrew has consistently denied the claims. our legal correspondent dominic casciani reports. a woman seeking her day in court. the unprecedented defendant, a prince of the realm. but have his lawyers now found a way to stop virginia giuffre's case from ever being heard? she says she was trafficked into sexual abuse and exploited by the man the right, jeffrey epstein. ms giuffre, then known as roberts, said epstein and his girlfriend coerced than teenager into abuse by prince andrew in london, new york and the caribbean. today, the release of a 12—year—old settlement in which ms giuffre accepted half $1 million to end her original case against epstein. the confidential deal has been made public because of its potential importance to pri

true civil lawyers suing the epstein compensation victims' fund and they got paid money. that was the defense's argument that this was all about money and manipulation. the problem ultimately with that was that there was still this great question mark left really about two main things, why had jeffrey epstein or accounts in his name wired ghislaine maxwell a staggering $30 million in total, thereabouts, and why had ghislaine maxwell stayed with a man who we heard through various testimony hadn't always treated her particularly well and yet she stayed in some sort of capacity. it was never quite clear what, over ten years. prosecutors in the end told the jury to use their common sense. they said why would these four women have come up here, faced this brutal cross-examination, told stories that were eerily similar just for the heck of it. use your common sense. and i think that's what the jury did. >> and, deborah, you know, you wrote in the "new york times" this week that maxwell's conviction represents a new front in the me too era, holding enablers accountable as well a

jeffery epstein could not have done this alone. he had a whole orbit of people who helped him with this. ghislaine was not the only person. she stepped out of the picture in the early 2000s. other people stepped in her role of trying to recruit and schedule these massages which were excuses to sexually assault young girls. >> one of the victims tweeted this after maxwell's conviction. my soul yearned for justice for years. today, the jury gave me that. i hope today is not the end, but another step injustice. maxwell did not act an alone. i have faith that they will be. she launched a civil suit against prince andrew. he denies the accusations. have you talked to her since maxwell's conviction? >> i haven't spoken with virginia, but i have spoken with other victims. i believe the same as she does. that they believe more people should be held accountable. this was a big, you know, conviction for them. she really was at the top of this conspiracy and to have her be held accountable was a big step. >> it was a big step. we can only hop

prince andrew is protected by this settlement agreement that was reached by virginia giuffre and jeffrey epstein in 2009 in florida. remember, this had been a confidential settlement agreement. it wasjust had been a confidential settlement agreement. it was just publicly released after a request through the courts over the last few days. and prince andrew's lawyer essentially said that the duke of york could have been served at that time under virginia giuffre's allegations to do with jeffrey epstein, virginia giuffre's allegations to do withjeffrey epstein, and therefore he will qualify under a phrase in that agreement about any potential other defendants. he says because at the prince could have been a potential defendant in that case, that he is protected from any future legal action. that essentially, virginia giuffre signed away her right to sue him or anyone else that she alleged sexual abuse by. they judge at one point said if the sultan of brunei had allegations against virginia giuffre, the settlement would protect him, and prince andrew's lawyers said he contends that it would. on the

what was jeffrey epstein like? magnetic, the were was jeffrey epstein like? magnetic, they were almost _ was jeffrey epstein like? magnetic, they were almost the _ was jeffrey epstein like? magnetic, they were almost the perfect - was jeffrey epstein like? magnetic, i they were almost the perfect couple. they had an electricity that emanated from them. they were charming and gracious and captivating and inviting. it was really hard to not want to be around them. is really hard to not want to be around them. . . really hard to not want to be around them. , ., ., i. ., , them. is that how you felt at times, but ou them. is that how you felt at times, but you wanted _ them. is that how you felt at times, but you wanted to _ them. is that how you felt at times, but you wanted to be around - them. is that how you felt at times, but you wanted to be around them? initially, they were very interesting. they were intellectuals, they were... they thought differently and they were a fountain of knowledge. i felt like almost any topic that i could think of to talk about