>> thank you, chair haney. we don't have any updates to our report. the contract before you is the same as it was when we reported in december. >> chairman: great. thank you. supervisor mar. >> supervisor mar: thank you. and thank you so much, dr. earlich for your presentation and sharing once again the rationale for this extending this contract for registry nurses. i know the commitment to filling the vacant rn positions and that really being the priority in addressing the staffing challenges at zuckerberg general hospital and d.p.h. and i think we can all agree that the registry, the use of registry nurses is needed and um, but, yeah, the strong preference is to fill a vacant positions and utilize them permanent nurses for labor reasons, for patient care reasons, but also for fiscal and financial reasons for the city. and so in your presentation, you mentioned that the registry nurses would mostly be used for leave to help cover nurse that is are on leave and not -- and, yeah, i just want to make sure i under

>> thank you, chair haney. we don't have any updates to our report. the contract before you is the same as it was when we reported in december. >> chairman: great. thank you. supervisor mar. >> supervisor mar: thank you. and thank you so much, dr. earlich for your presentation and sharing once again the rationale for this extending this contract for registry nurses. i know the commitment to filling the vacant rn positions and that really being the priority in addressing the staffing challenges at zuckerberg general hospital and d.p.h. and i think we can all agree that the registry, the use of registry nurses is needed and um, but, yeah, the strong preference is to fill a vacant positions and utilize them permanent nurses for labor reasons, for patient care reasons, but also for fiscal and financial reasons for the city. and so in your presentation, you mentioned that the registry nurses would mostly be used for leave to help cover nurse that is are on leave and not -- and, yeah, i just want to make sure i under

i did have a question to chair haney. >> chair haney. >> aye. >> vice chair safai. >> absent. we have two ayes with vice chair safai absent. >> great. amendments accepted. before we move as amended, supervisor mar. >> i just had a question. maybe mortar the bla. what the defense between these amendments that we just accepted that were presented by the department, what the difference between those are and what i think i heard you saying a different type of amendments that should have been the combined amount of the contracts. >> so the contracts have two cost components. one is a management fee. that is based on the number of spaces in each garage. that amount is what is listed in the original resolutions to the committee today. each of the contracts require m.t.a. pay all of the operating expenses associated with the garage. which amount to a much larger amount. 4 to $5 million per year and they have been in place since 2010 or 2011. the total spending on all four contracts is $230 million. for that is why the resolution amounts are different. it accounts for the historical sp

chair haney. i want to thank supervisor peskin and emily and h.s.h. and the lower knob hill neighbor for a quick productive community engagement discussion of this project over the past weeks. i do want to say this was what very important to me when we considered this a month ago that the city really commit to real outreach and meaningful engagement with the neighbors about this important project. to me, i think this is an example of how we can do these projects right and really not just jump to the conclusion. listening to them, allowing them to voice their very legitimate concerns and in this case, really come up with a very reasonable list of requests that the city for this project, the 16 items that were in the letter that i saw that we received last night. i appreciate the h.s.h.'s response. there will be a ongoing discussion about. i think it's been very productive. i do appreciate that. i guess i look forward. i know probably have lot of folks who will share their perspective in the discuss

chair. >> chair: supervisor mar? >> supervisor mar: thank you, chair haney. i want to thank supervisor peskin and emily and h.s.h. and the lower knob hill neighbor for a quick productive community engagement discussion of this project over the past weeks. i do want to say this was what very important to me when we considered this a month ago that the city really commit to real outreach and meaningful engagement with the neighbors about this important project. to me, i think this is an example of how we can do these projects right and really not just jump to the conclusion. listening to them, allowing them to voice their very legitimate concerns and in this case, really come up with a very reasonable list of requests that the city for this project, the 16 items that were in the letter that i saw that we received last night. i appreciate the h.s.h.'s response. there will be a ongoing discussion about. i think it's been very productive. i do appreciate that. i guess i look forward. i know probably have lot of folks who will share their perspective in the discuss

>> thank you, chair haney. we don't have any updates to our report. the contract before you is the same as it was when we reported in december. >> chairman: great. thank you. supervisor mar. >> supervisor mar: thank you. and thank you so much, dr. earlich for your presentation and sharing once again the rationale for this extending this contract for registry nurses. i know the commitment to filling the vacant rn positions and that really being the priority in addressing the staffing challenges at zuckerberg general hospital and d.p.h. and i think we can all agree that the registry, the use of registry nurses is needed and um, but, yeah, the strong preference is to fill a vacant positions and utilize them permanent nurses for labor reasons, for patient care reasons, but also for fiscal and financial reasons for the city. and so in your presentation, you mentioned that the registry nurses would mostly be used for leave to help cover nurse that is are on leave and not -- and, yeah, i just want to make sure i under

>> thank you, chair haney. operations is checking to see if there are comments and for those already on hold, wait until the system indicates that you have been unmuted. do we have any callers? >> mr. clerk, there are no callers in the queue. >> thank you very much. public comment is now closed. and so this is the changes that have been sent to us and they were red into the record. so i want to move to amend the resolution as offered by hsa. can we have a roll call vote on that please? on the motion offered by vice chair safai. >> aye. >> member mar. aaye. [roll call vote] with the increase in the contract amount, that will be deemed substantive and we should continue the matter. >> excuse me. there is no change in the amount from the original resolution. >> just a change in the amount of time. >> correct. deputy city attorney? >> fs either a change in the contract about o or the extension of the term and this would be a substantive amendment. so what we are doing here, the original resolution to delay until oc

>> yes, chair haney. [roll call vote] through january 31 the extend for march 1, 2022 for 11 years to correct the contract and amounts and increase the contract amount by $3.5 million starting total contract amount of approximately $46.4 million. item 4, to retroactively approve contract sfmta to 11/12.9 with imperial parking llc for management of the group a with the civic center, lombard street and performing arts, pierce street, mission bartlett and 16th and hoff streets garage and the 7th and harrison parking lot with the total expenditures of $60.3 million. to extend the contract year from february 1, 2022 to 11 years from february 1, 2012 through january 1, 2023. to contract the contract amount and increase the contract by approximately $5.2 million for a total contract amount of approximately $65.5 million. item 5, retroactively approve a contract with imco parking llc for the management of the group b with st. mary's square, portsmouth square and golden gate garage and kezar stadium parking lot fo

>> yes, chair haney. [roll call vote] through january 31 the extend for march 1, 2022 for 11 years to correct the contract and amounts and increase the contract amount by $3.5 million starting total contract amount of approximately $46.4 million. item 4, to retroactively approve contract sfmta to 11/12.9 with imperial parking llc for management of the group a with the civic center, lombard street and performing arts, pierce street, mission bartlett and 16th and hoff streets garage and the 7th and harrison parking lot with the total expenditures of $60.3 million. to extend the contract year from february 1, 2022 to 11 years from february 1, 2012 through january 1, 2023. to contract the contract amount and increase the contract by approximately $5.2 million for a total contract amount of approximately $65.5 million. item 5, retroactively approve a contract with imco parking llc for the management of the group b with st. mary's square, portsmouth square and golden gate garage and kezar stadium parking lot fo

chair haney. i want to thank everyone that called in. the strong advocates for our treasured park, gardens and golden gate park amenities and to the veteran advocates on who we have been working with on expanding access to these incredible resources. yes, i am very supportive of all of the work that the department has done along with the botanical garden society to create the more unified management in operating the framework for all three gardens. it is important for san francisco residents. through the amendments expand the waiver to veterans current nonresidents of san francisco. they deserve that as well. thanks again. i would move that we adopt the amendment that i have introduced to item 5. >> roll call on the amendment please. >> clerk: on the motion. >> vice chair safai. >> aye. >> member mar. >> aye. >> chair haney. >> aye. >> we have three ayes. >> thank you. because these are substantive amendments we need to continue for one week. i will make a motion to continue 6, 7, 8, 9 to next wee

welcome again. >> hi chair haney. i don't believe we have any particular update for this item for this week. this item, i think we'll use in future meetings should any kind of unexpected updates come up that are not -- we don't have a hearing previously scheduled for. nothing more to report beyond the items we have spoken to this week. >> supervisor haney: thank you. colleagues, any questions on this very broad hearing that we'll be revisiting. not seeing any, can we open for public comment please. >> clerk: the operator is checking to see if there are callers in the queue. members of the public who wish to provide comment on the item, press star 3 now. those on hold continue to wait until the system indicates you have been unmuted, that is your queue to start your comments. any members of the public who wish to speak? >> we have no callers in the queue. >> clerk: thank you. mr. chair. >> supervisor haney: public comment is closed. i am going to make a motion to continue item 5 to the call of the chair. can we have a

chair haney. item 11 authorizes the director of the mayor's office of housing to execute an amended and restated loan agreement with sunnydale infrastructure phase 1a 3 llc, for a total loan amount not to exceed 25 million to finance the second phase of infrastructure improvements and housing development related to the revitalization and master development of up to 1770 units of replacement public housing, affordable housing and market rate housing, commonly known as the sunnydale hope sf development and adopting findings that the loan agreement is consistent with the adopted mitigation monitoring and reporting program under the california environmental policy act, general plan and priority policies of the planning code. item 12 authorizes the parks department to accept and expend cash and/or in-kind grants valued at 10 million from sunnydale infrastructure llc to design and construct the hers playground recreation center for a term tocommence upon approval by the board of supervisors . members of

afternoon chair haney, commissioner gordon. this is an exercise we have to go through with our funding sources and the funding source we're looking at is called highway safety improvement program and usually those funds that we get our federal or critical street safety vision zeroconsistent projects . this particular time though we're getting funds from the state which we don't usually get, not under this highway safety program and because they are new funds, we have to go to the board ofsupervisors because the agreement is open-ended . this master agreement and it could extend over 10 years and because of that long duration , we need to approach the board ofsupervisors to get its approval . there's no net fiscal impact per se but without this master agreement in place we can't get one off brands including $2 million that we're waiting to, we've actually received sort of what we can't do anything with it until this master agreement is executed that $2 million is for traffic signal and safety improvements via market street. so i

supervisor mar. >> supervisor mar: thanks, chair haney. first of all, i wanted to thank once again the recreation and park department and the mayor's office and supervisor chan for all of your work on this ordinance that would once again make the -- access to the japanese tea garden free for san francisco residents and also free for veterans, non-resident veterans. and so this is a really important step forward to restoring full access to these world class amenities in golden gate park and we had continued this item for one more week to allow further discussion between the department and the mayor's office and supervisor chan on figuring out the details on thes flex pricing just to make sure we get the details right. i want to thank them for all their work on that and there are the amendments that were circulated to the committee members that i would like to introduce that basically just set or cast the flex pricing increased for non-resident adults at $7 and i think that's -- that would just make it clear about what the flex pricing would

welcome again. >> hi chair haney. i don't believe we have any particular update for this item for this week. this item, i think we'll use in future meetings should any kind of unexpected updates come up that are not -- we don't have a hearing previously scheduled for. nothing more to report beyond the items we have spoken to this week. >> supervisor haney: thank you. colleagues, any questions on this very broad hearing that we'll be revisiting. not seeing any, can we open for public comment please. >> clerk: the operator is checking to see if there are callers in the queue. members of the public who wish to provide comment on the item, press star 3 now. those on hold continue to wait until the system indicates you have been unmuted, that is your queue to start your comments. any members of the public who wish to speak? >> we have no callers in the queue. >> clerk: thank you. mr. chair. >> supervisor haney: public comment is closed. i am going to make a motion to continue item 5 to the call of the chair. can we have a

i'll turn it over to you, supervisor haney, to lead this item. >> supervisor haney: thank you, chair mar. and supervisor stefani for your leadership as well and your support for the legislation that led to the hearing that we're having today and also the other interventions that we're making to confront this deadly epidemic. as our city has come together to fight covid-19, we've also been in the midst of another epidemic that is taking the lives of hundreds of our residents every year. over the last two years in each of the last two years close to 700 people have died in our city from drug overdose. this is a huge increase over past years doubling or tripling in the last few years on the number of people who have died and it requires us to respond at a scale with resources, coordination and urgency to save lives. of course, we have incredible people on the front lines in our city departments, in our provider agencies, supportive housing shelters, people, the dope project, glide, health right 2360. the larger safer inside coalition who work every day to save lives, reverse overdoses.

i'll turn it over to you, supervisor haney, to lead this item. >> supervisor haney: thank you, chair mar. and supervisor stefani for your leadership as well and your support for the legislation that led to the hearing that we're having today and also the other interventions that we're making to confront this deadly epidemic. as our city has come together to fight covid-19, we've also been in the midst of another epidemic that is taking the lives of hundreds of our residents every year. over the last two years in each of the last two years close to 700 people have died in our city from drug overdose. this is a huge increase over past years doubling or tripling in the last few years on the number of people who have died and it requires us to respond at a scale with resources, coordination and urgency to save lives. of course, we have incredible people on the front lines in our city departments, in our provider agencies, supportive housing shelters, people, the dope project, glide, health right 2360. the larger safer inside coalition who work every day to save lives, reverse overdoses.

supervisor haney. >> chair haney: i have a question. i don't know if this is best for the deputy city or supervisor peskin. through the chair. there is currently, i see a six month prohibition at the beginning of someone's term. that would be extended to 12 months. this would add a 12 month prohibition on the submission every call petitions for the 12 months prior to the subsequent regular election. is there currently any time window connected to the regular election on the back end or are we creating new? are we extending similar to the beginning of the term or creating new prohibition for a window at the end of somebody's term that doesn't exist now? >> technically, procedurally, it is impossible to do in the last six months of somebody's term. that is not actually written but procedurally you can't. now it is written and it is written in such a way that effectively for the last year of that person's term when they are up for election you would be prohibited from recalling that individual in that seat, but the six month requirement is

supervisor haney. >> chair haney: i have a question. i don't know if this is best for the deputy city or supervisor peskin. through the chair. there is currently, i see a six month prohibition at the beginning of someone's term. that would be extended to 12 months. this would add a 12 month prohibition on the submission every call petitions for the 12 months prior to the subsequent regular election. is there currently any time window connected to the regular election on the back end or are we creating new? are we extending similar to the beginning of the term or creating new prohibition for a window at the end of somebody's term that doesn't exist now? >> technically, procedurally, it is impossible to do in the last six months of somebody's term. that is not actually written but procedurally you can't. now it is written and it is written in such a way that effectively for the last year of that person's term when they are up for election you would be prohibited from recalling that individual in that seat, but the six month requirement is

supervisor haney. >> chair haney: i have a question. i don't know if this is best for the deputy city or supervisor peskin. through the chair. there is currently, i see a six month prohibition at the beginning of someone's term. that would be extended to 12 months. this would add a 12 month prohibition on the submission every call petitions for the 12 months prior to the subsequent regular election. is there currently any time window connected to the regular election on the back end or are we creating new? are we extending similar to the beginning of the term or creating new prohibition for a window at the end of somebody's term that doesn't exist now? >> technically, procedurally, it is impossible to do in the last six months of somebody's term. that is not actually written but procedurally you can't. now it is written and it is written in such a way that effectively for the last year of that person's term when they are up for election you would be prohibited from recalling that individual in that seat, but the six month requirement is

supervisor haney. >> chair haney: i have a question. i don't know if this is best for the deputy city or supervisor peskin. through the chair. there is currently, i see a six month prohibition at the beginning of someone's term. that would be extended to 12 months. this would add a 12 month prohibition on the submission every call petitions for the 12 months prior to the subsequent regular election. is there currently any time window connected to the regular election on the back end or are we creating new? are we extending similar to the beginning of the term or creating new prohibition for a window at the end of somebody's term that doesn't exist now? >> technically, procedurally, it is impossible to do in the last six months of somebody's term. that is not actually written but procedurally you can't. now it is written and it is written in such a way that effectively for the last year of that person's term when they are up for election you would be prohibited from recalling that individual in that seat, but the six month requirement is

i am matt haney, chair of the budget and finance committee, joined by committee members safai and mar. our clerk is mr. brent and i want to thank sfgovtv for broadcasting the meeting. >> the minutes will reflect that committee members participated in this remote meeting through video conference. the board recognizes that public access to city services is essential and invites public participation in the following ways. public comment will be available on each item on the agenda. we're streaming the call-in number across the

i am matt haney, chair of the budget and finance committee, joined by committee members safai and mar. our clerk is mr. brent and i want to thank sfgovtv for broadcasting the meeting. >> the minutes will reflect that committee members participated in this remote meeting through video conference. the board recognizes that public access to city services is essential and invites public participation in the following ways. public comment will be available on each item on the agenda.

i am matt haney, chair of the budget and finance committee, joined by committee members safai and mar. our clerk is mr. brent and i want to thank sfgovtv for broadcasting the meeting. >> the minutes will reflect that committee members participated in this remote meeting through video conference. the board recognizes that public access to city services is essential and invites public participation in the following ways. public comment will be available on each item on the agenda. we're streaming the call-in num

of the budget and finance committee supervisor matt haney in eviction defense attorney states. his goals include building more affordable housing , reducing street homelessness, getting renewable energy and green transit. elections director john art says more than 250,000 san franciscans will be eligible to vote in the runoff election about half the city but aren't says something he's never seen before, is that people in the assembly district will need to vote for times in just one year. following this week's special election. there's the runoff election in april just to fill the seat through the end of this year. then two months later , comes the june primary to fill the next term, which will be decided by november's general election. when you have these multiple elections of the year, the last people are really paying attention and engaged. yeah i do worry about them being uncertain about the process that could lead to turn out burn out just trying to get people to the polls or post their mail in ballots. we expect more phone calls. trying to answer people's questions about w

and the chair of the board and the vice chair is peskin. the clerk is angela sow. commissioner haney has a conflict in scheduling and cannot attend today's meeting so i am excusing him. and i understand that a couple of our commissioners are going to be absent between 10:30 and 1 is:00 and i will excuse commissioners melgar and ronen for that period. >> motion to require a vote to take without objection if nobody objects. >> is that correct? >> a you may take it without objection if no one objects to the vote. >> great. thank you. so i will move we excuse commissioner haney and melgar and ronen so long as they need to be absent and will take that without objection. will you please call the roll? [roll call] commissioner chan? >> present. commissioner mar. >> present. >> commissioner melgar. >> present. commissioner preston? >> present. >> commissioner peskin? >> a present. >> commissioner ronen? >> present. president safai. commissioner walton? >> a present. >> we have quorum. >> thank you, madam clerk. i will make a motion to excuse commissioner haney for the meet

and the chair of the board and the vice chair is peskin. the clerk is angela sow. commissioner haney has a conflict in scheduling and cannot attend today's meeting so i am excusing him. and i understand that a couple of our commissioners are going to be absent between 10:30 and 1 is:00 and i will excuse commissioners melgar and ronen for that period. >> motion to require a vote to take without objection if nobody objects. >> is that correct? >> a you may take it without objection if no one objects to the vote. >> great. thank you. so i will move we excuse commissioner haney and melgar and ronen so long as they need to be absent and will take that without objection. will you please call the roll? [roll call] commissioner chan? >> present. commissioner mar. >> present. >> commissioner melgar. >> present. commissioner preston? >> present. >> commissioner peskin? >> a present. >> commissioner ronen? >> present. president safai. commissioner walton? >> a present. >> we have quorum. >> thank you, madam clerk. i will make a motion to excuse commissioner haney for the meet

assigned to the public safety and neighborhood services in replace of supervisor haney today. please let us know if there are any callers ready to speak on this item. call (415) 655-0001. enter the meeting id of 24808404683. for those already in the queue, please continue to wait until the system indicates that you have been unmuted and that will be your cue to begin your comments. can we have the first caller, please. >> caller: good morning. this is patrick. while i appreciate supervisor safai bringing a first draft to this legislation forward, it needs massive amendments or complete re-write to broaden the scope of the data to be reported and which facilities must report the data and the types of facilities patients are being discharged to out of county. so i look forward to supervisor mar's leadership in crafting replacement legislation on this topic. i recently won a sunshine ordinance complaint against the department of public health which had been providing me with out of county discharge data dating back to july 2006, but then claimed in september, 2020 that its replac

reporter: we've got for really competitive candidates, matt haney, david c. they've been joining the sunny weather, hosting election drives, trying to call voters, really getting out the vote for tomorrow's election. some of those candidates have held political office in the past but others are relative newcomers, who have never held office in san francisco before. kristen: shared with us of them hitting the san francisco chinatown neighborhood hard. that was a community thought as being less politically engaged. >> definitely permit our report has been focusing extensively on this. sort of the efforts to get chinese-americans to vote in this election. he told me today that it's been an organic movement of chinese-americans just feeling a little bit more engaged in the selection. one of the big issues on the ballot as the school board recall. a lot of chinese-american parents feel like this is their chance to get their voice heard for the future voice of their kids. who may be concerned about the future of san francisco schools. with enclosures due to covid,

and the chair of the board and the vice chair is peskin. the clerk is angela sow. commissioner haney has a conflict in scheduling and cannot attend today's meeting so i am excusing him. and i understand that a couple of our commissioners are going to be absent between 10:30 and 1 is:00 and i will excuse commissioners melgar and ronen for that period. >> motion to require a vote to

>> i am going to say vice chair peskin moved that. i will say seconded by commissioner preston. please call the roll. >> commissioner chan. >> aye. >> commissioner haney. >> aye. >> commissioner mandelman. >> aye. >> commissioner moore. >> aye. >> commission melgar. >> aye. >> commissioner peskin. >> aye. >> commissioner preston. >> aye. >> commissioner safai. >> absent. commissioner stefani. >> aye. >> commissioner walton. >> aye. >> we have 10 ayes. the minutes are approved. >> thank you, madam clerk. is it possible for monaco barnett to turn her camera off. thank you. now, madam clerk, can you call the concept be agenda items 4-8. >> concept agenda for approved as january 11th board meeting. staff is not planning to present but is available for questions. >> thank you, madam clerk. no comments or questions. consent agenda. >> so moved. >> moved by commissioner walton. >> seconded by commissioner chan. madam clerk, please call the roll. >> commissioner chan. >> aye. >> commissioner haney. >> aye. >> commissioner mandelman. >> aye. >> commissioner moore. >> aye. >> commissioner

haney. madam clerk, do you have any announcements? >> clerk: yes. comments and opportunities to speak during public comment period are available via phone by calling 415-655-0001. again, 415-655-0001. the meeting i.d. is 2481-775-8861, then press pound and then press pound again. when connected, you will hear the meeting discussion but will be in listening mode only. when you hear the item called you want to comment on, press star, nine. best practices are to speak slowly and clearly and turn down your television or radio. alternatively, you may submit written comments to alisa.somero@sfg.org or you can sent your written comments to city hall, room 204, carlton b. goodlett place, san francisco, california, 94102. finally, items on today's agenda are expected to appear on the board of supervisors agenda of february 8, 2022 unless otherwise stated. mr. chair? >> chair mar: thank you. i'm going to call item 2 out of order at the request of the district attorney. madam clerk? >> clerk: yes. item

haney. madam cl

and the chair of the board and the vice chair is peskin. the clerk is angela sow. commissioner haney has a conflict in scheduling and cannot attend today's meeting so i am excusing him. and i understand that a couple of our commissioners are going to be absent between 10:30 and 1 is:00 and i will excuse commissioners melgar and ronen for that period. >> motion to require a vote to take without objection if nobody objects. >> is