china. principal. china strongly urges the united states to stop playing the taiwan card and using to i want to contain china. and people in taiwan itself are anxious over the u. s. house because trip members of the public told us the u. s. just wants to spread its power and influence. not help them with lucy, touch china's bottom line. she touched the red line. so both the us and china have to take actions accordingly. they just use, tie one to get our attention for domestic market flow. she's to visit with attention across the taiwan straits, which has no benefit at all for the taiwan people with it's just gone 3 o'clock in the morning here in the russian capital. it's 8 a in type pie, and we're coming to live from moscow studios. thank you so much for joining us. what china has begun military drills an area surrounding tie one that's in response to the visit of the us. how speaker nancy pelosi to type pe. he has some the latest footage shade by china is media warplanes $21.00 chinese warp

one china policy. i think that does, and the statements do contradict the one china policy do contradict official us policy statements. and i think the united states has kind of walked a type rope ever since the recognition of the people's republic of china. i believe that the recognition of the people's republic of china as the sole representative of china and the chinese people, was done less out of respect for common sense and decency. and the republic of china is so small, in comparison to the norms of international law, which dictates successive states. clearly states that the people's republic of china should be the only successor states. there is kind of this push for a new cold war. and this policy that we've been, the one china policy is kind of one of the last bastions of peace and tranquility between the united states and china and the united states and the rest of the world. earlier my colleagues always to say, discuss pelosi as a to tie one without correspondence. rachel blevins. hello. sh

government of china. so what we are doing is to, you know, make our self stronger and prosperous so that we can satisfy all our people's desire for a better life. and at the same time, you know, china can have many more to deliver for work, peace, security, and common development. and china is a force for peace and stability. but regrettably, my country is being misperceived and miscalculated. some people see china as a challenge or even a threat trying to replace united states. this is not, or it's not our intention. so we want to have a stable comparative relations with united states because we do believe that china, united states have a massive share responsibilities and common interests. you know, we have our challenges at home. i think the 1st thing to do, but each of us to manage our own affairs well. and the good relationship between china, united states will serve the interest of our 2 countries. and we also side to meet the desire of the international community for peace security and for joint ef

china. everybody knows that taiwan is part of china. this trip itself is going to be a symbolic one. only, and it's us what, it only serves her personal interest. this has consequences and has repercussions. so that's why china is, you know, making quite drastic reactions. it hurts the feeling of the chinese people. i think this incident will be marked in the history of us china relations, not as a positive one, but as a very disastrous point. this is not only a national thing for china, this us era goes this american arrogance pools, handling relations with other countries is not acceptable in this 21st century. and this is something i think the rest of the world should come to realize. the big issue on this is that the united states has an unstable in position towards china officially called it's one china policy. washington officially acknowledges beijing as the only legitimate government for the entirety of china, including taiwan, or wherever that's along with cause for the peaceful res

because china says our visit will hollow out the one china policy will be in violation of the one china policy and will really cause more damage to china us relations. so she is today and tonight she troublemaker in the whole world because she disregarded sanity judgment. and the rash analogy in pursuing her personal goals in taiwan. whether she wanted to use this visit to hide the fact or the husband is appearing cold in the united states. that's another matter. but i think people in this part of the world, people on both sides of the tower straight, do not want to see nancy pelosi because she does not have and the legitimate business in the try, not area. even the cross straight relation is what she breathes is only bad news and disaster she made really grow a big wedge in the china, us relations on the white hands and in the cross street relations. if any, sorry, sorry to interrupt, but is there any particular particular reason, do you think why nancy pelosi would want to be the chief troublemakers? you call her right now in the region? what do you really think her aims are here? wel

and china. yeah. so how is that going, don? just what you've said. they're the general of use, the it's i biggest, there's so many ramifications at 2 such a conflict or even an escalation here. and what's being said about policies trip there where, you know, initially there was more support for her from both sides of the aisle. but now we're starting to hear those voices that are speaking out and saying that they're concerned that they're concerned that this could lead to a direct confrontation between the u. s. and china. and they're really questioning why pull osi is embarking on such a visit in the 1st place. take, listen to what was said. nothing good will come of it. taiwan will not be more secure or more prosperous as a result of this purely symbolic visit. and a lot of bad things could happen. these include a chinese military response that could result in the u. s. being plunged into in direct conflicts with a nuclear armed russia and a nuclear armed china at the same time. this week with

but selling to china does not mean selling out to china. selling them american soybeans does not mean they are buying up american farmland. host: now we have pat on the democratic line from new york. caller: good morning. i have two questions. are there any treaties or laws that say we should defend taiwan? number two, was there anything about the semiconductor industry that was involved with nancy pelosi's visit? because of that new law were we are going to start to build semiconductors and taiwan is such a big exporter of semiconductors. guest: the united states does not have a legal or treaty obligation to defend taiwan. president biden has said several times over the past year we made a promise to do that. we did not. the taiwan relations act of 1979 says any attempt by mainland china to take taiwan by force would be a matter of grave concern, that is the language. a matter of grave concern to the united states. that is not a treaty obligation. taiwan is not a formal ally of the united states. so no, there is no treaty that binds us to

summit declaration of later to contain china could have to continue the publications of china. and of course, russia as well. the 2 countries being joined together because both represent opposition and a poll of attraction in the world to the united states. this is the moment nancy pelosi arrived at function a port in type pe, the flight tracking sight flat rate on 24 dot com for the number of people following her jet, which almost 3000000 a record figure for the service. the us house speaker said her visit has evidence of the u. s. commitment to support tie when needs democracy. pelosi has become the highest ranking american official to visit the self willed island in 25 years. the white house, meanwhile, has stated that a dialogue between washington and beijing will be kept open and that the us does not want a crisis with china. the united states will not and does not, will not seek and does not want a crisis. we are prepared to manage wellbeing chooses to do at the same time, we will not engage in sabre rattling, we will continue to operate in the seas in the skies of the we

policy the one china principle. so i don't think that china would walk away. the issue here is this. i completely agree that there are parallels between the ukraine situation, the taiwan situation in that the u. s. is looking to use both as a proxy to contain those that it sees as an adversary. the difference though is that taiwan intrinsically is also the lynchpin for american hegemony, not just in the pacific when, globally, in that whoever possesses taiwan well if, think about the 2 alternatives. if the u. s. wins, we can see an independent taiwan american military bases in taiwan. and that would constrain china dramatically. on the other hand, if taiwan were unified with china militarily peacefully, that changes the global landscape as well. so this is a very, very important, a juncture for china, us relations and the world in this way. it's a little bit different from the ukraine, but i think it is the same in that the u. s. is looking to use either ukraine or taiwan as a proxy to contain those it sees as an ad

of a one china policy, which is that there is one china, and its capital is in beijing. and taiwan is a part of that is not with united states signed onto the sean i communicate said very clearly that the united states acknowledge, is that the chinese give it did not say it agreed with china. right. and so china has been trying to shift what the united states meant and the shock i can get a k. it has in fact, been trying to shift the status quo for many years. and there is always going to be push back the 9 stage public opinion is strongly supportive of taiwan ability to determine its own future of many of your top officials. pie one, we're educated with the and in the united states. and it is very important to us not to web a democracy, which has been a good friend of the united states to come to the treatment that beijing has made it out in shin john and hong kong. ok, i'd like to cross over to you, henry, who you want to say. do you have any response to that? what you just heard there? well, i think that a communique there was saying the people cost us time on straigh

on mainland china. it's as primary export market. taiwan imports, i think something like 90 percent of its energy, 98 percent of its energy. it needs china next door to be a trading partner. and the u. s. again came in as it did with ukraine in 2014 and said, oh yeah, we're going to destroy this relationship and would you get in return? nothing you get some promises from nancy pelosi, you know, take those to the bank. right. i mean, again, trying to make sense of it is very difficult. andy, i'm going to be a little provocative right now. well, at the biden ministration is walking away from the one china policy. so china can to, i mean, it's kind of a get out of jail free card. okay. you, you don't, you want to adhere to it? why should beijing go ahead? well, this is a very complex, dangerous situation, peter. so the cornerstone of china us relations is taiwan and the taiwan policy, the one, the one trying to policy the one china principle. so i don't think that china would walk away. the issue here is t

one china policy has been a definitive aspect of us china relations for the past 40 year. but today's visit by nancy pelosi seems to put all of that on the brink of destruction. the one china policy is that the united states acknowledges the people's republic of china as the one chinese government on the mainland that does not have diplomatic relations with the government on time one and an advocate. taiwan being peacefully re integrated with the mainland into one giant. now it appears that despite the fact that nancy pelosi has gone to taiwan, the white house and john kirby and others, us state department are maintaining that the one china policy does in fact, remain intact with us. they are not backing away from that. however, we're seeing signals to the contrary, a lot of action by the united states and the lead up to today's big of that i have indicated that you asked the one china policy may be on the brink of being revoked . this is what we heard from a representative of the american institute in taiwan observing recent trends, the united states no longer sees taiwan

on mainland china. it's as primary export market. taiwan imports. i think something like 90 percent of its energy, 98 percent of its energy. it needs china next door to be a trading partner. and the u. s. again came in as it did with ukraine in 2014 and said, oh yeah, we're going to destroy this relationship and would you get in return? nothing you get some promises from nancy pelosi, you know, take those to the bank. right. i mean, again, trying to make sense of it is very difficult. andy, i'm going to be a little provocative right now. well, at the biden administration is walking away from the one china policy. so china can to, i mean it's kind of a get out of jail free card. okay. you, you don't, you want to adhere to it? why should beijing go ahead? well, this is a very complex, dangerous situation. peter. so the cornerstone of china us relations is taiwan. and the taiwan policy, the one, the one trying to policy the one china principle. so i don't think that china would walk away. the issue here is

-china competition. for example, china's recent sale of armed drones to saudi arabia does not mean that we should rush to provide those drones are cells that the saudis have a clear record of miss using such weapons yemen and we are right to distance ourselves from these abuses. chinese investment into the vanity projects shiny new cities for egypt president sisi and the saudi crown prince was questionable returns for investors. there's no compelling reason why the united states should be seeking to counter china's investment any projects with our own funny. there are limited areas where china at the u.s. share interest. we shouldn't ignore them. for example, both china and the united states have shared interest in securing shipping lanes in the gulf. both benefit from iranian nuclear deal to avoid proliferation. and both the united states and china benefit from stability in the region. finally, we should recognize that while china's influence in the region is increasing, it has limits. the united states

russia and china. and the provocations are going on with taiwan. this is not going to be the last. there's going to be more of this. but those are some of the possibilities, i think, long, short term, foreign and domestic. but of course the question remains, what actually is going to be china's response? because we saw a sneak of following the meeting, she had earlier with tie ones president way. she said to quote, now more than yvette america's solidarity with taiwan is crucial. and she went on to say again, another quote, america's determination to preserve democracy here in time one is iron clad. so how do you think these cummings will be perceived by basing and how are they likely to respond? well, i don't know, the chinese just track record is that, you know, they're, they're not the full share. i don't think they're going to be provoked. you know, they have to do something, no, probably step of their activities and straight in some way. but i don't think they're going to take the bait and know th

from china. the speaker of the us house of representatives, meeting the presence of taiwan despite these warnings of severe consequences from china while flows is to say the most senior us official to visit the self governing island in 25 years into bringing to via harlan the international editor. of taiwan plus and well, tennis, what do you make of this as we see this, this visit wrapping up? well, you know, it wasn't just warning from china. president joe biden had said that the u. s. military thought it would be a bad idea. and so what is she leaving in her way? get a short trip for her, but definitely taiwan is going to have to deal with the consequences of her trip for a long time to come. on the one hand, it's put taiwan a given time on what i want. recognition attention. look, i want been all the headlines, all the major new stations i've been covering. i want watching it very closely. taiwan also has suddenly seen and pouring of support by other democracies at this point. what are the sam

one, china policy has been a definitive aspect to us china relations for the past 40 year. but today's visit by nancy pelosi seems to put all of that on the brink of destruction. the one china policy is that the united states acknowledges the people's republic of china as the one chinese government on the mainland. it does not have diplomatic relations with the government on time. one then an advocate, taiwan being peaceably re integrated with the mainland into one giant. now it appears that despite the fact that nancy pelosi has gone to taiwan, the white house and john kirby and others that us state department are maintaining that the one china policy does in fact, remain intact with us. they are not backing away from that. however, we're seeing signals to the contrary, a lot of action by the united states and the lead up to today's big that i have indicated that the us, the one china policy may be on the brink of being revoked. this is what we heard from a representative of the american institute in taiwan observing recent trends, the united states no longer sees taiwan i

because china says her visit will hollow out the one china policy will be in violation on the one china policy and will really cause more damage to china. us relations. what she brings is only bad news and disaster she made really grow a big wedge in the china, us relations on the one hand and in the cross street relations. on the other hand, i think it is the aggressive nature of the united states. in this part of the world, and this is also one reason why we do not have regional stability and peace prevailing to a very large extent. that's very away from tie one for a bit here and get to some other stories on the international. as we understand it is a so called leader has been killed in american drones dry can cobble or they attack rock. the center of the african capital reported a drone fire 2 missiles at the al qaeda leader as he stepped onto the balcony of a house where he lived with family members. one taliban spokesman describe the u. s . operation as a violation of international principles, but president joe biden had said that he would promise to fight terrorists enough dennis

in july and august 2019, -- in the south china sea and the east china sea. in 2020, we saw simultaneous military on north and south of taiwan. we have seen this major ramp up over the past year and used by aircraft across the median line. we have also seen a growth and cyber capabilities try to manipulate the environment and attacked chinese government and other websites. other activity is not typical. the amount of live fire, multiple missiles potentially fight -- essentially flying over taiwan --. what this conveys, based on some research poking -- some research recently published, -- against taiwan in the region. combining with this geopolitical pressure. seeing that continue as we go forward with these grassroots efforts to shape the opinion in taiwan society. >> if you could really touch on what you saw as the initial u.s. response and we could follow-up on this more in round two. >> absolutely. i will highlight three areas. plans for a maritime transit over subsequent weeks. we haven't yet seen one of those announcements. they are typically announced a

it is a bit disingenuous to say that china has not changed. china has changed. this is clearly within precedent. the reaction this time is far above and beyond what we saw the last time around. clearly something within the ccp has changed and it's difficult to imagine a scenario where countries around the region and the u.s. are not going to respond to that. kim: june teufel dreyer, is there anything that you would add to that? guest: yes, i believe the speaker from beijing when he said that this is upsetting the status quo. china has been upsetting the status quo and the taiwan strait for quite some time now. with a lot of provocative actions and talks about timetables for unification, which they persist in calling reunification, even though taiwan has never been part of the people's republic of china . i was appalled at the effort to rewrite history here. the spokeswoman for the chinese foreign ministry saying that taiwan has always been a province of china. this is simply not true. it was declared a province in the qing dynasty for less than 10 years. less th

against china. at the same time, bill should be very concerned because for most people, her china is their largest trading nation. it is in economic superpower in this region. and that is a power which china is very well known to wield and decided to use it against many countries. it would be a real concern. so i think people watching very carefully at this stage, just to see whether this is china in sort of brief outburst of anger, this is going to be a much more sustained period of hostility stay with a said tony, you, let's go back to beijing, listen to the a replies from the press been given by the chinese foreign ministry. let's just listen lety. them respectful sovereignty into town integrity. this principle of international relations will just become empty was andr, separatists and extremists will only redouble their cane boldness, and in a peace and slippery the heat on has been hot. one in this region will be seriously jeopardize and also state council. the one you said that this incident i

sol think— don't think china wants that. sol think it _ don't think china wants that. sol think it will — don't think china wants that. sol think it will finish _ don't think china wants that. sol think it will finish — _ don't think china wants that. sol think it will finish — what's- think it will finish — what's worrying _ think it will finish — what's worrying is _ think it will finish — what's worrying is that _ think it will finish — what's worrying is that forever, l think it will finish — what's- worrying is that forever, there might— worrying is that forever, there might be _ worrying is that forever, there might be a _ worrying is that forever, there might be a blockade, - worrying is that forever, there might be a blockade, and i worrying is that forever, there might be a blockade, and she| worrying is that forever, there i might be a blockade, and she can correct _ might be a blockade, and she can correct mew _ might be a blockade, and she can correct me... i’m— might be a blockade, and she can correct me- - -_ correct me... i'm not su

there is but one china in the world tie one is an inalienable part of china's territory. china strongly urges the united states to stop playing the taiwan cart and using taiwan to contain china. let's go live and learn more about this and crossing to our correspondent caleb more. find caleb, very good evening to you from moscow. where does the one china policy currently stand given? well, these latest events. well, the one china policy has been a definitive aspect to us china relations for the past 40 year. but today's visit by nancy pelosi seems to put all of that on the brink of destruction. the one china policy is that the united states acknowledges the people's republic of china as the one chinese government on the mainland. that does not have diplomatic relations with the government on time one and an advocate. taiwan being peacefully re integrated with the mainland into one giant. now it appears that despite the fact that nancy pelosi has gone to taiwan, the white house and john kirby and others, the us state department are maintaining that the one china policy does in fact, remai

summit declaration of later to contain china could, can, to continue the publications of china. and of course, russia as well. the 2 countries being joined together because both represent opposition and a pole of attraction in the world to the united states. earlier, my colleague voice in shade, discuss pelosi as a to tie one with a correspondent, rachel blevins. hello. he's finally touched down there. you know, even an, even in the face of all this rhetoric from china, hello, she apparently had to make her visit. what are your expectations now that she's here? you know, she released that statement right after she touched down in which she claimed that she was there to support were she referred to as taiwan, the vibrant democracy. she also went as far as to say that she does not believe that she is in violation of the one china policy, which is absolutely not how beijing sees it is not what they have worn again and again, when it came to the lead up to this proposed visit now it was also notable that she talked about democracy there because it makes you wonder how do the people

saying that china had -- china has messed with the status quo. they said they actually warned airlines to avoid areas near taiwan where they are conducting military exercises so we are getting the reaction from taiwan that says they are sabotaging the status quo in the taiwan state. >> absolutely. that is what is grabbing people's attention. waiting for nancy pelosi to start out this news conference in taipei. let's get to your business flash news. luber surging the most in 2020. customers kept handling rides in ordering takeout food all in the face of quickening u.s. inflation. the second quarter revenue doubling to more than $8 billion in the second order. shares are still down 30% since the start of the year. >> while trips were up 24% which is really healthy growth, gross booking happen faster than that. i think the good news for us is that surge levels are actually coming down. hca's are coming down so as the marketplace becomes more balanced, we actually see strength in terms of trip growth going forward. >> let's stay with earnings. we hav

takes this approach to china? you know, it is most in book of course, since those who are playing and just are not just to do to kids, but to be the powers ignatius you are the most mighty and capable in the world. both political and economic an end are forcing numerous times as well. so this way, there's not just just a play for the kids. it's much more serious and it poses bridge really great and tangible strapped to the region and globally, as well as the 1st. the 2nd will yes, it assumes that if china is number one in terms of. busy external trade, the world in united states definitely is number to us. china trade is more than 600000000000 years dollars less your can be even this year. and both countries are tightly konami kinda financially logical in and it's really so it's better to when i say, for systems from crash, then the fact is mutual interest in developing normal commercial freight relationships and set aside all that really coasts mood. this is the 1st or 2nd. you mentioned the elections? yes. there

so this logistic nightmare that it has two supply is china controls the south china sea.

some feared retaliation from china. and by the way, after pillows, his visit, what i want is not targeted. i think she is making trouble for us. of course i am worried about military confrontation. while others were less concerned. the hotel you. if i use the chinese threats, i feel numb. i don't feel particularly nervous, but i think that the media is exaggerating the matter. yet. here tell you that with taiwan now effectively surrounded by chinese military fears of a new crisis in the taiwan straits, arising all eyes and now on beijing i'll return as an analyst with him, a cato institute for china studies here in berlin. i asked her why china's leadership found the timing of nancy pelosi said trip. unsettling. well, this yes, particularly sensitive the heating thing because he is seeking, asked the lena and the chief chinese come it's party party stays actually. so lastly, once a week or undermined not least by the united states, and it's beyond just this year, going ahead to 2049. he has made unification with time on

yes, we could find a war with china. it's going to be extremely destructive, but we could fight it in india in the region. well, i don't know that japan. i don't know that japan and the other country and south korea that, that host are basis, want to get involved in the war in china and i, that's a really good point. let me go to martin right now that the, you know, the, the, the entangling alliances, the u. s. has, which is inherently dangerous. if there's an attack on japan, then that's one thing. if there's an attack on australia, it's another thing. but taiwan is a very different thing because even the us recognizes that taiwan is part of china. that is the very basis of establishing diplomatic relations back in 79. martin go ahead. which is why i don't, i don't think don't. i don't personally, i don't think that going for war and i'll stand aside to, to with your other committees. i think they're looking for a state of emergency and i think this is going to be a huge public relations exercise where their heart but m

then you have china growth slowing down, you have the sec cracking down, you have many china listed companies in the u.s. being taken off the u.s. listings. the government entities today announced. manus: it is like dating in dubai, littered with potholes and disappointment. you talked about the s&p at 4100. the whole growth narrative has been refused, up 50% from the lows it met in january. i am talking but the nasdaq, up 20% from the lows in june. it is hot. i'm sorry, i shouldn't be so subjective. is it difficult for you to be bullish on growth in a not finished fed hiking cycle? guest: we have never actually stopped being bullish on growth. [laughter] i don't think it is anything new. part of our equity strategy has always been around technology. we never took the overweight off technology. all we said was look at the select subsectors. we have a huge pull on electric vehicles, seeing the new bill passed in the u.s. incentive has been given in europe. while you have oil prices going up, oil supply is becoming an issue, we think focus on electric vehicles will go up more. nothing has chang

i would say, yes, we have known that equation of china and china has showed their real face. but you just admitted earlier that the intensity of chinese military drilled and the intensity of chinese belligerents has increased off of this visit. i'm just trying to understand how that helps. i want that mix us that keeps us and bring us into the awareness of the real fear of china. and i think is kit that we knew that they are tempted to us. they are going to attack us. i have known that most people like how many have known the us is the 10 m m a socket. 1989 on the 4th of july june. we know that will kill the people that we are attacked. i want if they think is necessary. that because they are straightly with us, with military and west, registering the with our democracy. so just to be clear, you think that chinese invasion of taiwan it is not a question of if but when, when yet so clearly in the less than 10 years the chinese, the chinese government has shown their real fairs not only to what i want, but also towards japan and also especially in the south china sea. that's th

some feared retaliation from china. and by the way, after pillows, his visit, our taiwan is not targeted. i think she is making trouble for us. of course i am worried about military confrontation. while others were less concerned. the hotel ye? yeah, i used to china threats my feel numb. i don't feel particularly nervous, but i think that the media is exaggerating the matter. yet yet young dog. with taiwan now effectively surrounded by chinese military fears of a new crisis in the taiwan straits, arising all eyes and now on beijing our eyes are on type. hey we're, we're joined by joyce lee joyce. give us the latest. what's the situation right now? so china regularly conducts military drew's near taiwan, but it has never tried to encircle with the island. the de facto a blockade will loss and too sunday afternoon and some target has shown up within. ty wants territorial. see including an area just 20 kilometers from the south and city college shown. it's was noting that chinese citizens have express huge disappointment a

but martin, this is china. it's not phantom bother does not bring me to go to john, get new york, just go in just jump in, john. i mean the one common thread i'm seeing throughout. busy all this is that the democrats of the party of chaos domestic. they were behind the insurrection, the violent insurrection in summer 2020, when our city is burned for 2 months. and now. busy abroad we see that the party of chaos ignited this war, reagan reignite in this war and ukraine. another person for war in china. so i get the fuel, they just want more chaos. more chaos brings that more power, more conscious. they can justify more contracts, whether it's spending at home or spending for defense, well, defense spending for war abroad. and that's the only common courtesy, the part of a chaos, of course. as in other respects respectable guest said they, the democrats are also very much interested in provoking china, provoke in russia. i think they do want the 2 front war because this is their moment in history, where they are

it's not just china's backyard, it's china, it's territorially china. they are a handful of small countries that recognize taiwan as a separate country. the usa itself does not. this is an incursion, a military incursion into china. and that's why the chinese are taking it very seriously. who your policy right now is playing with fire us? seems to free years ago have been doing anything up to the point of really violating or clearly rejecting one trying to principle for example, the u. s. has invited taiwan to the democracy some some meet last year which the chinese cy has repeatedly warned against. and said that a violation of the one on the principle, the u. s. seems to be, you know, force in china to concede in trade use to and it's position of russia about the tension of bush and so on. it looks like that. china has not conceded during the last few talks and the u. s. we have the 2 options, but to escalate the matter further. just align with the regional and age tie ones. presidential office website was reportedly hit by a cyber attack on choose the

china has chosen to overreact what china is defending his own sovereignty and territorial integrity. the fact is, the speaker's visit was peaceful. i was still very scared with you. of course, i hope there won't be any more, but taiwan is ours. also coming up, europe's largest nuclear power plant is a battlefield. u ends. nuclear chief says they're fighting between russia and ukraine around the site could lead to disaster sublease yet is completely out of control being controlled. me tell you, speaking by russia, whilst the ukrainian local operators continue to work every day, they're leaving to inevitable moments of the friction if not actual violence. ah, welcome to the day. china is continuing as blockade of taiwan with live fire military drills around the island. as tensions rise following the visit of u. s. how speak nancy pelosi. chinese military is 5 ballistic missiles into the waters off taiwan government in taipei says, it scrambled jets to warn off chinese aircraft that entered its air defense zone. and a number of taiwanese government websites have come under cyber attack.

from china's standpoint they see the united states we his commitment to the one china policy which has created the framework for u.s. china and taiwan relations. there is a need to underscore their resolve for u.s. china policy and taiwan policy. i suspect this will only be the first movehat they take. they can undertake exercises for several weeks or even months to come, there can be an economic component to this, most likely focusing on taiwan. i do not think these exercises will be the sum total of china's response. >> does this visit and the response to the visit, how does this shift has relationship between china and the united states which is already pretty fraught? >> thi it confirms the worst case assessment on both sides. that they are drifting from a competitive relationship, the white house often talks about being in competition with china which will be a part of a much more direct confrontation. i think we are witnessing the start of this process. it will unfold over a period of time, it is not inevitable. it appears as if that is the direction of travel we are heading. >>

my role is trying to distract united states from a fear of china and the from china phobia. and the word is big enough to accommodate china and united states. let me give you a story. the 1st secretary of treasury hamilton. and there is a musical code and no hamilton, and he had a political enemy that is elenbird. at that time he was a widespread them in the united states. yes. and the, and the result was not happy to man. just say the lead had to do and at the end of the do vice president but lamented that the word is big enough for me and the mr. help me at that. so let's look at the work today and let's look at china us relation. i want to borrow mr. birth remarks that the word is big enough for china and united states. and we don't need to have the tragic incident more than 200 years to repeat herself today. will ambassador chin gong, chinese ambassador united states. i really appreciate your candor and for your joining us today and talking us through these issues. thank you so much. thank you . so what's the bottom line today? we talked about the future of us china rela

it shows that china is aware _ left. it shows that china is aware of _ left. it shows that china is aware of the power dynamics and wants _ aware of the power dynamics and wants to — aware of the power dynamics and wants to make sure that it's punishment against what infuses an acceptable activity is mainly— an acceptable activity is mainly directed towards taiwan. i mainly directed towards taiwan. i expect— mainly directed towards taiwan. i expect bistros to put a lot of pressure on taiwan and whatever china is doing in these _ whatever china is doing in these drills in the next couple of days, — these drills in the next couple of days, it _ these drills in the next couple of days, it would not be the first — of days, it would not be the first and _ of days, it would not be the first and only time that china does — first and only time that china does them. china is trying to normalise _ does them. china is trying to normalise a pattern of more aggressive behaviour against taiwan _ let's take a look at some other stories in the headlines. managing

to contain china. and people in taiwan itself are anxious over the u. s. health because trip members of the public told us the us just wants to spread its pro and influence not help them for them to lucy touch china's bottom line. she touched the red line. so both the u. s. and china have to take actions accordingly. they just to use tie one to get our attention for domestic market place he's visit will add tension to cross the taiwan strait, which has no benefit at all for the taiwan people. with hello and welcome to our international book coming to live for my headquarters here in moscow for me and the team. thank you very much for joining us. china has begun military drills and areas surrounding ty, one that's in response to the visit of the u. s. how speaker nancy pelosi to tie pe . he has some of the latest footage shade by chinese media. 21 chinese warplanes passed through ty, one's a defense identification zone. and according to beijing, military sources drills will include a non nuclear missile

we agree with one china policy. we signed onto it and all the attendance agreements made from there. but the idea that can be taken by force just taken by force, is just not just not appropriate. when the president made that statement, it seemed to be really quite different from what our stated policy on taiwan is, which is one of strategic ambiguity, ambiguity that it, that, that we, either except that taiwan can be taken by force. nor do we give, i guess, current to the notion that taiwan can be independent from china. can you tell me what you think us policy is? with regard to what the president said, what henry kissinger crafted and what nancy pelosi is doing today? right, well, ever since henry kissinger crafted this shanghai communicate back in the early 1970 united states has had a rather, as you said, ambiguous policy, we wanted to that issue to be somewhat fuzzy. we recognize that there is one china . but we also say that we don't believe the status between china and taiwan should be resolved unilaterally b

and i say, afraid of china. yes. the straits mean a text of china is for a to mean some of us. but it's wolfy is worth you that pelosi make these visitor and we were coming in from the part of a hard because it was as sign of some bowl. a signed off. so did they're ready, but you had those are similar signs before me. my question to you is what just i wanna know now after nancy pelosi is visit about us commitment to taiwan that it didn't know earlier. the accretion of china has had already already been there before the visit, the pelosi, maybe people here didn't know that much, but we experience that. that's the reason why parents said i came here. may that is the visit because i want to support our friends. it not democracy who ass it under this rating of china. so is that the christian is not to so correctly. i would say, yes, we have known that the creation of china and china has showed their real face. but you just admitted earlier that the intensity of chinese military drilled and the intensity of chinese belligerents has increased off of this visit. i'm just trying to und

already said that china needs to sto - ? ,, already said that china needs tosto? ., already said that china needs tosto? to stop? the risks of accident ou can to stop? the risks of accident you can never _ to stop? the risks of accident you can never truly _ to stop? the risks of accidentl you can never truly completely rule them out despite the nature of the accident. that is what there. at this point i think it is almost a cliche to say that a war is in nobody�*s interest in what we see a lot of fiery rhetoric from the chinese side it is important to pay attention to the opinion of the leaders in china whose leaders that make his opinions count. so last week, even though nancy pelosi was intending, she still took —— president xi still took a phone call with president biden and i think that tells something. president xi also set the tone as well in the readout afterwards. president xi said he described the president biden that it is wrong to characterise the relations is primarily one of competition. it should be one of cooperation on many issues. so that t