applications to join nato. this is a very important vote. the nato vote is a very important vote for american security around the world. finland's and sweden's membership will strengthen nato even further and is all the more urgent given russian aggression, given putin's immoral and unjustified war in ukraine. putin is strengthening the nato alliance and nothing shows it better than the vote we will have this afternoon. with the vote, the senate will come together in a bipartisan manner and bolster the western alliance in the face of growing authoritarianism. when leader mcconnell and i met with the finnish president and the swedish prime minister back in may, we made a commitment to get done as quickly as possible before the august recess, and today we are keeping that commitment by working together. despite the differences between both sides, i've always said that when the opportunity arises, democrats would be willing to work with republicans in a bipartisan way to get things done. the past -- in the past fe

if you compare it to nato, the military capabilities of russia versus nato. i think there is nothing to be, that there is no. and this is why risks of further extension of conflict be to moldova bid to other regions, i assess them as completely non realistic at this current moment doesn't mean that it will not happen in 2356 years down the road. but at the current moment, this is the single most challenging task for the russian army military forces to stabilize and sustain the successes and gains that have in ukrain so yes, but i have to come in. a lot of these illnesses that plagued the russian army plague particularly european armies as well. there is a difference between paper and what troops actually have. there is a low state of readiness of material. some stuff is really old. it was just sort of superficially refurbished. it doesn't work the the way it was intended to be of course the big difference in nato is there is doesn't work the the way it was intended to be the u. s. army's combat proven. it's capable is high tech um, which is as long as the ame

countries are banking on nato -- banking on nato's door because of russia's behavior. as i mentioned earlier sweden and finland have long histories of neutrality. vladimir putin's balance towards his neighbors has made that neutrality untenable in their minds. a few critics of nato expansion love to quote the words of george washington's farewell address. our first president warned against permanent alliances and he recommended as little political connection as possible with other nations. that advice was well suited for a young republican in 1796 but washington didn't stop writing where these critics stopped reading. the great statesman saw a future where america would gain strength, stand up and assert itself. washington continued. with me a predominant motive has been to endeavor to gain time to our country, to settle immature its yet recent institutions and to progress without interruption to that degree of strength and consistency which is necessary to give it humanly speaking the command of its own fortunes. we have gained since washington's time the command of o

join nato. >> absolutely. >> they had been living under soviet domination, they were annexed by stolen during world war ii. and their view, they were necessarily thinking about germany or advances into germany. margaret thatcher was, and the late 1980s. she was concerned about a unified germany because world war ii, but they were concerned about an aggressive soviet union. >> hundred percent. >> but ukraine falls into a different category. maybe i'll get to ukraine and nato now. i want to talk to you about what condition u.s. russia relations were in as the yeltsin and clinton administrations got underway. because they're in pretty good shape, there are still some leftover trust and communication and some hope for cooperation in the 1990s. so, it's up to you, do you want to talk about ukraine and nato in the early 90s, or u.s. russia relations in the early 90s? this time i interviews go. >> we can build it up to ukraine. i think the 1990s is the high point of the u.s. russian relationship. you h

now we have the chance within nato. most other countries what they now in the european union and -- denmark is also participating in the european defense policy. the more countries get more places to play, to develop, and to develop a defense policy. what the nordic countries are looking to is a stronger, alliance within nato and the european union. it will have an effect and on friday, i am traveling to sweden where i will meet with my nordic colleagues to discuss things. >> i am so glad you mentioned finland and sweden and their potential membership. how do you see their pending membership as an impact on the alliance and what do they bring to the table and how do you think the alliance will benefit? >> it will be a huge benefit. both for the nordic countries and the nordic region as a whole, but also for the nato alliance. we have had for generations and especially, the last 15 years, a closer relationship when it comes to defense policy. we had different kinds of corporations and corporations with countries outside

nato laid a new foundation for lasting peace and security and through more than seven decades, nato has proved the indispensable alliance committed to europe whole, free, and at peace. today we see all too clearly that nato remains an indispensable reliance for the world of today and the world of tomorrow. our alliance is closer than ever. it is more united than ever and when finland and sweden bring the number of allies to 32, we will be stronger than ever. [applause] this will benefit all of our people. i will go over to that table and sign the ratification. communicating that it is important for membership of nato and thank you all for being here and i want to ask the ambassadors if they are willing to come up and stand with me while i sign. thank you. [applause] [applause] [applause] ♪ >> do you approve of the trump parade, mr. biden -- the trump raid, mr. biden? pres. biden: thank you all. [applause] >> this afternoon the white house monkeypox response team and health officials brief reporters on the response efforts. watch at 3:30 eastern. at 5:00 a conversation with gregory mee

it is about infected, created by nato nato's business machine. because you must remember, if nato disbanded shareholders in the united states and elsewhere in lodge obs companies would lose millions and millions, they'd only have one yacht instead of 2 yards each. there. oh dear, wouldn't that be terrible? there's a simple method to put it right with the rest of the world with we'll say we were forced to seize the territory brain, older and maintained security, a dull fiddler with bring order security and democracy. the reasons used to justify molten was waged by nato and led by the u. s. b. not toys. i installment fund feelin that's been north vietnam, m deacons, toiler. emily taylor shall thus roughly show poorly to show controller. beulah pushed him to the you, one of them global to become undesirable countries and undesirable leaders become the face of the enemy and change it and manure for reuben. then mon xena, ivan and folk, i didn't find present here. does i source land the veto some fine to come up, the oddly enough to source name stuffs

nato forces are protecting there. they are also working in the enclaves, and they are very agile in avoiding any of the provocation from other side. but the thing that i know, speaking with the servant community in -- the serbian community in the north, kosovo forces in the north, there are always incidents. however, if tensions are rising, i believe these incidents could be seen as a provocation. i hope the kosovo side will not try to make any reasons for the serbian community, that is frightened at the moment, to react. so, the responsibility is shared for both sides. they are meeting in brussels in front of the community there, t he envoy, and also -- they are aware of these facts. and that everything that both serbia and kosovo will get, they will get it on the negotiating table. i believe this notion is well-placed in belgrade. i hope and this is the message that we transfer when i spoke with him in june, that the negotiating table should be the only table for solving any of the issues. luckily there is no zelens

the bigger issue of nato enlargement and nato membership, i understand, but there was no imminent threat that warranted rush and military intervention. this is a problem that should have been resolved, but the negotiating table couldn't owns this war. well, professor captain, i agree with you. 100 percent and owns this war in those just put in but also russia. we will berry this. we will carry rather this send for years, decades and perhaps even generations to come. this is a huge tragedy for all of us. we all have relatives in ukraine and they cause actually every single day we are, you know, very much connected to that conflict. no illusions about that. but at the end of the day, put in is the president of russia. and he has obligations before russia in defending its strategic security. don't you think again and we keep circling around that question that the west, who have been a little bit more accommodating, if not for the sake of russia, then for the sake of ukraine, in providing russia with the security that it asked for. and what it asked for is simply the guarantees of neutrality

it was a nato operation. it was an legal nato operation. they killed over 2000 innocent civilians and frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war any body a ah, a really good paying for the summer. like be up to still bill was then. yeah. like i'm on that single dental, but the head nozzles in formulation full and i would at last but i had that machine with a couple of c daily mother stated that my idea what i did well, that's edible. up here. let me look. it looks just let me ask with like a dealership or book store, you got the immediate z, u z. a bull supposedly with, oh, great on. you have to run it. that is almost it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia. they couldn't go too far the so this case i was mean of annual visibility or cost one. i scenario niga. others vienna illegal staying out this year? we say no good. i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, a national, he was lewinski a scenario and last night as bna with talk of the psychiatry posted the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you k

nato laid a new foundation for lasting peace and security and through more than seven decades, nato has proved the indispensable alliance committed to europe whole, free, and at peace. today we see all too clearly that nato remains an indispensable reliance for the world of today and the world of tomorrow. our alliance is closer than ever. it is more united than ever and when finland and sweden bring the number of allies to 32, we will be stronger than ever. [applause] this will benefit all of our people. i will go over to that table and sign the ratification. communicating that it is important for membership of nato and thank you all for being here and i want to ask the ambassadors if they are willing to come up and stand with me while i sign. thank you. [applause] [applause] [applause] ♪ >> do you approve of the trump parade, mr. biden -- the trump raid, mr. biden? pres. biden: thank you all. [applause] >> at least six presidents recorded conversations while in office. here many of those conversations. >> the nixon tapes, they are part private conversations, part deliberations, and

norway, already in nato, sweden joining nato, finland joining nato, right across from the three baltic countries that are much more in need of assistance than these two countries that are joining an alliance that will give them that assistance. it's an incredible day for nato. the baltic sea -- the arctic, i've heard more, mr. president, on this floor in this country on the arctic than in the past 25 years. the arctic basically becomes nato territory with the sole exception of russia, the united states, canada, norway, sweden, finland become countries that are bound not only in the neighborhood to the arctic but also in a supportive alliance. we've been hearing about how china wants to become an arctic power. i think the change in nato makes it incredibly harder for china to become an arctic power or for russia to become an arctic abuser and we're seeing that happen right here. again, great capability. the swedes have an air force, a navy. they have the best cyberoffensive and defensive capability in europe. that large industrial base, finland agreed to five 64f-35's to replace f-18's.

it is about infected, created by nato nato's business machine. because you must remember, if nato were disbanded, shareholders in the united states and elsewhere in lodge obs companies would lose millions and millions they'd only have one year instead of 2 yards each there. oh dear, wouldn't that be a terrible with there's a simple method to put it right with the rest of the world with will say we were forced to seize the territory brain motor and maintained security for adult hitler with bring order security and democracy. the reasons used to justify molten was waged by nato and led by the u. s. b. not toys. i installment fund feelin data to the north, vietnam, m deacons, toiler, emily taylor shaw. the trust, leisure politician controller beulah pushed him to the gear, one of them global to become undesirable countries and undesirable leaders become the face of the enemy. when he gets on manure for reuben . then mon zailynn, ivan and folk, i didn't find present here. as i thought, lund, vito, some fine to come up, the ugly notice horse ashamed s

nato is one answer to that. it's been coherent for the nato member states, but you have a lot of countries that are not in nato and you have belarus to the north of ukraine and you have also moldova to the south where there's a russian military presence in part of the country and belarusa sort of been absorbed recently into russia. at least at least militarily and ukraine is is a war zone so gradually sort of year by year exactly as you suggest there was a war in georgia in 2008. it hasn't been a peaceful process. and in fact, it's been getting more bloody and more violent year by year this process of figuring out where does russia end and where does europe begin if those are the right terms? yeah. there's been a lot of debate to say the least about the nato issue to what extent can we blame nato expansion for russian aggression john meersheimer the scholar basically says the united states is responsible for the war in ukraine by pushing nato expansion we can get to him in a little bit but to your point about th

s. sr is attacked by 250 nato divisions. soviet thought so taken over by nato naval forces. the 3rd phase, annihilating the usaa, wiping it off the world map. to that end, all new weapon types that to be deployed, nuclear, chemical, radiological, and biological, as well as small items. the final phase, breaking the ussr into 4 zones and posting nato troops on its territory. ah, more than 18000000 people. the majority of the huge countries population would have died in the intense bombing and some on slicing. ah, we have a series of these cries of war plants, like kennedy briefed on them in the early 1960. he was, are by no means that we call ourselves the human race. but these plans continued for preemptive attacks against the soviet union. but this was in essence an updated version of the nazi general plan. aust, that envisaged eliminating millions of slavic people and as in world war 2, when much of europe stood united against the usaa or the u. s. plans to muster all native nations under the aegis of operation dropshot. in 1949, the soviets acquired the own nuclear weapon

it was a nato operation. it was an legal nato operation. they killed over 2000 innocent civilians and frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war any body ah, oh, in needs to come to the russians state will never be. i'm calling the sam stevenson, american house, or something up with within the fifty's babbled this middle keys on. i need to bargain speed you one else about with we will ban in the european union. the kremlin. ca, yep, machine. the state aunt rush up to date and switch r t spoke next. even our video agency, roughly all band to on youtube with political she did receive a request with oh, when i was shown seemed wrong when all through just don't hold. i mean, you have to say proud disdain, because the african and engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look so common ground. it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia. they couldn't go too far. the so viscous. i was mean of amiability authors, one i scenario niga, others vienna, illegal, staying

it was a nato operation. it was in legal natal brakes and they killed over 2000 innocent civilians and frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war any body ah, ah, ah, no nations, no nation has ever done anything like it in all history. ah news. ah, it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia that he couldn't go too far the some excuse. i was name of what amiability artist, one i scenario niga, others vienna, illegal staying up this year. we say no good. i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, a national. he was lewinski scenario and that's not as bna you with talk of the psychiatry for say the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know what i mean was not he is ashley sweeney theater. he and his in their go. yeah, tropical. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall. so treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to. but they did. nato said ha, it's ours. we move east international law exists as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it

it's simply not credible to a bigger issue of nato enlargement and nato membership. i understand, but there was no imminent threat that warranted rush to military intervention. this is a problem that should have been resolved, but the negotiating table putin owns this war. well, professor captain, i agree with you 100 percent and owns this war in those are just put in but also russia. we will bury this. we will carry rather this send for years, decades in perhaps even generations to come. this is a huge tragedy for all of us. we all have relatives in ukraine and they cause actually every single day we are, you know, very much connected to that conflict. no illusions about that. but at the end of the day, put in is the president of russia, and he has obligations before russia in defending its strategic security. don't you think again and we keep circling around the question that the west, who have been a little bit more accommodating, if not for the sake of russia, then for the sake of ukraine, in providing russia with the security that it asked for. and what it asked

it is about infected, created by, by nato nato's business machine. because you must remember if nato, what is bad shareholders in the united states and elsewhere in lodge obs companies would lose millions and millions they'd only have one year instead of 2 yards each . there. oh dear, wouldn't that be terrible? ah, there's a simple method to put it right with the rest of the world. ah, we'll say we were forced to seize the territories, bring order, and maintained security, adele fiddler with bring order security and democracy. the reasons used to justify molten was waged by nato and led by the u. s. he not toys. i installment phone feelin d, that's all the notes. he hadn't m deacons, toiler, emily taylor shaw. the trust alicia politician controller beulah pushed him to the you. one of the global to become undesirable countries and undesirable leaders become the face of the enemy. when he gets on manure for reuben, then mon xena might and, and folk i didn't find present here as iceland. the v dot some fine to command the oddly enough to source ocean i

and our nato partners, just as we are ramping up our defense spending and our capabilities, our nato partners are doing the same. so we are all interdependent upon one another, but we are investing, you know, pound for pound, the equivalent or more than most of our... but there's a bind here, isn't there? because the more you invite nato�*s forces to expand their presence here — and i believe that of all three baltic states, you now will have the largest deployment of nato forces on your territory — the more you do that, the more the russians talk of provocation. 2ajune, sergei lavrov, foreign minister, said, "the eu and nato�*s are gathering a coalition for war "with the russian federation. "we are going to look at this very carefully." does that russian language give you pause? look, russia is waging a war in ukraine. nato is not waging a war against anyone. the way to provoke russia — and this history shows that we've been arguing this for many, many years — weakness provokes russia. russia made a miscalculation that ukraine was easy, that ukraine was weak, and that pr

and our nato partners, just as we are ramping up our defence spending and our capabilities, our nato partners are doing the same. so we are all interdependent upon one another, but we are investing, you know, pound for pound, the equivalent or more than most of our... but there's a bind here, isn't there? because the more you invite nato�*s forces to expand their presence here — and i believe that of all three baltic states, you now will have the largest deployment of nato forces on your territory — the more you do that, the more the russians talk of provocation. 2ajune, sergei lavrov, foreign minister, said, "the eu and nato are gathering a coalition for war "with the russian federation. "we are going to look at this very carefully." does that russian language give you pause? look, russia is waging a war in ukraine. nato is not waging a war against anyone. the way to provoke russia — and this history shows that we've been arguing this for many, many years — weakness provokes russia. russia made a miscalculation that ukraine was easy, the ukraine was weak, and that provoked

the 2nd phase, the ussr is attacked by 250 nato divisions. soviet thought so taken over by nato naval forces. the 3rd phase annihilating the ussr, wiping it off the weld map. to that end, all new weapon types that to be deployed. nuclear, chemical, radiological, and biological, as well as small items. the final phase, breaking the ussr into full zones and posting nato troops on its territory. ah, more than 18000000 people. the majority of the huge countries population would have died in the intense bombing. and subsequent fighting we have a series of these kinds of war plants, like kennedy briefed on them in the early 1960 s. he was our of by, you know, any that we call ourselves a human race. but these clans continued for preemptive attacks against the soviet union. but this was in essence an updated version of the nazi general plan. aust, that envisaged eliminating millions of slavic people and as in world war 2, when much of europe stood united against the usaa for the us plans to muster all native nations under the aegis of operation dropshot. in 1949, the soviets acquired their o

it was a nato operation. it was a legal nato operation. they killed over 2000 innocent civilians and frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war any body ah, [000:00:00;00] a ah, ah. and when the choice by now another quite natural, the mobile blog post estimate sure i keep a twinge, quick document on the bus and then potentially for me. but i'm going to push will give you my direct line to get that up. this lab radius love. it will much blew out all the different benefits you want to get 1st and i left with gamma wolf, which doesn't feel like we are much more than enough notice on punch group or use your for holding a picture. where are you using this to hold? you go to the grill guard showing as guards the property or what is covered or is it, i've got the new park with more can i do this? kimberly put us. 5 goes oh so this is latoya e. yeah. put us on a do cross gaza. i thought if she was the last november read sima was provide alicia with me. they also what? because i get your locals. so to most of the 7 people have been in a fa

and our nato partners, just as we are ramping up our defense spending and our capabilities, our nato partners are doing the same. so we are all interdependent upon one another, but we are investing, you know, pound for pound, the equivalent or more than most of our... but there's a bind here, isn't there? because the more you invite nato�*s forces to expand their presence here — and i believe that of all three baltic states, you now will have the largest deployment of nato forces on your territory — the more you do that, the more the russians talk of provocation. 2ajune, sergei lavrov, foreign minister, said, "the eu and nato�*s are gathering a coalition for war with the russian federation. we are going to look at this very carefully." does that russian language give you pause? look, russia is waging a war in ukraine. nato is not waging a war against anyone. the way to provoke russia — and this history shows that we've been arguing this for many, many years — weakness provokes russia. russia made a miscalculation that ukraine was easy, the ukraine was weak, and that provo

given the fact that old decisions in nato require consensus couldn't turkey seriously blunt nato's edge. not nature's edge, but can blantan lodgement clearly because you need an unlimited. you say the turkey is involved in a very bloody and difficult syrian civil war. and remember the cause. this faction is also a factor in internal turkish politics, including in, in the current campaign, in turkey. so issues to do with a courtesy parties, all the formations are very serious turkey and finland and sweden. i have to engage in a series dialogue with talk your budget, but i can assure you that the great majority of members, poland, included, we'll see finland and sweden as enhancements of our security. and i'd be very happy to have the freedom to fin alongside me in the trench. let's talk a bit about america if we may. joe biden has spent the time since he took office, telling your opinions. america is back. but the holy, legitimate question that the pins and throw back at him was for how long is that question still valid? has the us become intrinsically unreliable for europe? wellington y

it was a nato operation. it was in legal nato operation. they killed over 2000 innocent civilians and frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war any body. ah ah, although sure doubly new industry to restock and just look up some of novels only a muscle is onion noon. she kitty doesn't being in the green shield on another swimming as close to mamma cook as goose creek summary tamika. but i put a, his ashley of a decent, wanted with wonder. no 3 3rd of cool jason, the tea leaves but not, not, but the key for the chino drawings to network for phones that arrive something like that. and then we go with that voice id that might be more effective. i had some little grain lisa with it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia that he couldn't go too far the so this case i was mean of what amiability auth last one. i scenario niga. others vienna, illegal. staying on this, you know, i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, a national. he was lewinski scenarios, not be any with talk other psychiatry or say the one. ye

the bigger issue of nato enlargement and nato membership, i understand, but there was no imminent threat that warranted rush and military intervention. this is a problem that should have been resolved, but the negotiating table putin owns this war. well, professor captain, i agree with you. 100 percent of which in owns this war in those just put in, but also russia. we will, berry this. we will carry rather this send for years, decades and perhaps even generations to come. this is a huge tragedy for all of us. we all have relatives in ukraine and they cause actually every single day we are, you know, very much connected to that conflict. no illusions about that. but at the end of the day, put in is the president of russia. and he has obligations before russia in defending its strategic security. don't you think again and we keep circling around that question that the west, who have been a little bit more accommodating, if not for the sake of russia, then for the sake of ukraine, in providing russia with the security that it asked for. and what it asked for is simply the guarantees of neu

it was a nato operation. it was in legal nato operation. they killed over 2000 innocent civilians and frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war anybody a a ah ah mm. a news media was cards and that if you speak russian, keep your voice down while out and about a couple of don't put your human symbols on display. yeah. a guy so you guys don't talk to strangers. 7 i avoid noisy gatherings with what she won't get them in and what actually eaten your colleagues and perhaps also your friends think you're guilty because you'll russian, you much now a a a, a glad to with being a by mutual evidence. i'm sure you've specific struggle with oh, with the russian state will never be tied up on the most i'm seeing with this is tabitha keystone. i used to faddle stevie when else call was about with greville van in the european union. the kremlin media machine, the state on russia today, and split or t sputnik given our video agency, roughly all band on youtube and pinterest, and we could push a digital electricity with me. it was also of the carr

and our nato partners, just as we are ramping up our defence spending and our capabilities, our nato partners are doing the same. so we are all interdependent upon one another, but we are investing, you know, pound for pound, the equivalent or more than most of our... but there's a bind here, isn't there? because the more you invite nato�*s forces to expand their presence here — and i believe that of all three baltic states, you now will have the largest deployment of nato forces on your territory — the more you do that, the more the russians talk of provocation. 2athjune, sergei lavrov, foreign minister, said, "the eu and nato are gathering a coalition for war with the russian federation. we are going to look at this very carefully." does that russian language give you pause? look, russia is waging a war in ukraine. nato is not waging a war against anyone. the way to provoke russia — and this history shows that we've been arguing this for many, many years — weakness provokes russia. russia made a miscalculation that ukraine was easy, that ukraine was weak, and that provoke

it was a nato operation. it was in legal nato brakes and they killed over 2000 innocent civilians and frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war anybody a no nation, no nation has ever done anything like it in all the history with it was also a vicarious walk. it was intended to show russia the new russia that he couldn't go too far. the so his case i was mean of amy visibility across one i scenario yoga. others vienna illegal staying up this year? we say no good. i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, a national you was lewinski scenarios, not be any with talk other psychiatry posted the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know what i mean was not he is actually to swear in the theater he has in there go. yeah, that's not that cool. mm. hm, after the collapse of the wall. so treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to. but they did. nato said ha, it's ours. we move east. international law exist as long as it serves the american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exis

s. sr is attacked by 250 nato divisions, so via phone, so taken over by nato naval forces. the 3rd phase, annihilating the usaa, wiping it off the world map. to that end, all new weapon types that to be deployed, nuclear, chemical, radiological, and biological, as well as small items. the final phase breaking the ussr into full zones and posting nato troops on its territory. ah, more than 18000000 people. the majority of the huge countries population would have died in the intense bombing and subsequent fighting. ah, we have a series of these cries of war plans with kennedy briefed on them in the early 19. 60. he was, are of by no means that a we call ourselves the human race. but these plans continued for preemptive attacks against the soviet union. but this was, in essence, an updated version of the nazi general plan. aust, that envisaged eliminating millions of slavic people and as in world war 2, when much of europe stood united against the u. s. l or the u. s. plans to muster own nato nations under the aegis of operation dropshot. in 1949, the soviets acquired their ow

it is about infected, created by, by nato nato's business machine. because you must remember, if nato, what is bad shareholders in united states and elsewhere in lodge obs companies would lose millions and millions they'd only have one year instead of 2 yards each there. oh dear, wouldn't that be a terrible with there's a simple method to put it right with the rest of the world. ah, we'll say we were forced to seize the territory, bring motor and maintained security, a dell fiddler bring order security and democracy. the reasons used to justify molten was waged by nato and led by the u. s. b, not toys. i installment fund feelin d, that's all the notes, the addon, m, d controller, emily taylor shaw, the trust leisure politician controller. beulah pushed him to the you. one of them global to become undesirable countries and undesirable leaders become the face of the enemy when she gets on manure for reuben, then mon xena, my in and folk i didn't find present here as iceland. the v dot some fine to command the oddly enough to source ocean im stuffs thes

the bigger issue of nato enlargement and nato membership, i understand, but there was no imminent threat that warranted rush and military intervention. this is a problem that should have been resolved, but the negotiating table couldn't owns this war. well, professor captain, i agree with you 100 percent and owns this war in those just put in, but also russia. we will, berry this. we will carry rather this send for years, decades and perhaps even generations to come. this is a huge tragedy for all of us. we all have relatives in ukraine and they cause actually every single day we are, you know, very much connected to that conflict. no illusions about that, but at the end of the day, put in is the president of russia, and he has obligations before russia in defending its strategic security. don't you think again and we keep circling around that question that the west, who have been a little bit more accommodating, if not for the sake of russia, then for the sake of ukraine, in providing russia with the security that it asked for. and what it asked for is simply the guarantees of neutralit

the bigger issue of nato enlargement and nato membership, i understand, but there was no imminent threat that warranted rush and military intervention. this is the problem that should have been resolved, but the negotiating table couldn't owns this war. well, professor captain, i agree with you. 100 percent and owns this war in those and just put in, but also russia. we will bury this. we will carry rather this send for years, decades and perhaps even generations to come. this is a huge tragedy for all of us. we all have relatives in ukraine and they call us actually every single day we are, you know, very much connected to that conflict. no illusions about that. but at the end of the day, put in is the president of russia. and he has obligations before russia in defending its strategic security. don't you think again and we keep circling around that question that the west, who have been a little bit more accommodating, if not for the sake of russia, then for the sake of ukraine, in providing russia with the security that it asked for. and what it asked for is simply the guarantees of ne

despite nato membership, turkey rejected calls to boycott russia. and instead they say they want to deepen their ties. but turkey also has a good relationship with ukraine, even supplying turkish made drones for use in the war. talks between ukraine and russia have since stalled. let's bring in our guest, maximilian is a fellow foreign policy institute and an expert in affairs. he judges from london. they are a specialist in the contemporary history of the middle east and a fellow in international relations she joins us from moscow. they are a former diplomat and director of a think tank that focuses on turkeys or in security, economic into digital policy. and he joins us from istanbul. thank you very much, all of you for joining us on inside story. i would like to begin with you. how have russia and turkey gotten to this point of cooperation, this point of closeness? >> well, this all began approximately in 2000. and they have been fortunate. and it is still partially based on the anti-western stance. in the beginning of the 2000, both russia and t

it is about infected, created by, by nato nato's business machine. because you must remember, if nato were disbanded, shareholders in the united states and elsewhere in lodge obs companies would lose millions and millions they'd only have one year instead of 2 yards each. there. oh dear, wouldn't that be a terrible food? there's a simple method to put it right with the rest of the world with will say we were forced to seize the territory brain, older, and maintained security. a del fiddler bring order security and democracy. the reasons used to justify molten was waged by nato and led by the u. s. he not toys. i installment fund fealand data to the north, vietnam m. deacons colo, emily taylor shaw. the trust leisure politician controller beulah pushed him to the gear. one of them globus, to become undesirable countries and undesirable leaders become the face of the enemy. when he gets on manure for reuben, then mon xena might and, and folk i didn't find, present here. those eyes, those land the veto, some fine to come up. the up leon, notice horsesho

it was a nato operation. it was an legal nato operation. they killed over 2000 innocent civilians and frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war anybody ah, ah, ah, ah ah, so this is also a vicarious war. it is intended to show russia the new russia that he couldn't go too far. the some excuse. i was mean of what amiability artist, one i scenario niga, others vienna, illegal, staying out this year. we say no, i'm here in the grocery, visio. well, a national, he was lewinski scenario and last night was bna with eat, talk of the psychiatry for say the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know, you know what i mean was not, he is actually to swear in the paper. he has in go. yeah, tropical. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall. so treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to them. but they did. nato said, ha, it's ours. we moved east international law exists as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist. so, truthfully, there is no such thing as international law. since the s

it was a nato operation. it was in legal nato operation. they killed over 2000 innocent civilians and frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war any body a ah mm. with us all started. i'm really glad i paid for the whole spot at the summer's flooring with crystal balls then. yeah. camilla come on, sing with donald, but the head nozzles in formulation full and i would add last but i had mentioned with our policy daily mother style. my idea what i did well, that's edible up. it's like let me love it. but she for fun loving national circumvention issue for the little farm edema like gosh, her good little place for dealership there must or would look. sonya told me to see you live up, upgrade your bathroom or go to school supposedly with mission with us. they did, you must be a little brighter. oh, grave on your car run, it must be it is also a vicarious walk. it was intended to show russia the new russia that he couldn't go too far. the sofa ski, so his name of amy will visibility. arthur asked one i scenario yoga others vienna you lea

it was a nato operation. it was in legal nato brakes. and they killed over 2000 innocent civilians and frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war anybody ah, ah ah, what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy confrontation, let it be an arms race is an offense, very dramatic development. only personally and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very difficult time time to sit down and talk with it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia that he couldn't go too far the so his case i was mean of what amiability artist, one i scenario niga, others vienna. you leave of stana this year. we say no, i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, a national you was lewinski scenario and last night was bna with the talk of the psychiatry. mostly the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know what i mean was not v, as ashley sweeney pay it yet. mm hm. they go. yeah. tropical. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall, so treaty organization, nato expanded east,

it was a nato operation. it was in legal nato operation. they killed over 2000 innocent civilians and frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war and anybody ah with oh, seemed wrong when all right. just don't hold any you have to fill out these days because the advocate and engagement, it was the trail. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look for common ground. it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia. we couldn't go too far the service cuz i was mean lever, amiability, artist, one i scenario, you google us, vienna, you leave the stana this year. we say no, but i'm here in the grocery, visio, or a national. you was lewinski scenario and last notice be any with the talk at the psychiatry. mostly the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know, you know, what i mean was not v as ashley sweeney theater. here as in there, go, yeah. touch article. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall, so treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to them. but they did.

the bigger issue of nato enlargement and nato membership, i understand, but there was no imminent threat that warranted rush to military intervention. this is a problem that should have been resolved at the negotiating table. brewton owns this war. well, professor captain, i agree with you 100 percent and owns this war in those just future, but also russia. we will barry this. we will carry rather this send for years, decades and perhaps even generations to come. this is a huge tragedy for all of us. we all have relatives in ukraine and they cause actually every single day we are, you know, very much connected to that conflict. no illusions about that, but at the end of the day, put in is the president of russia, and he has obligations before russia in defending its strategic security. don't you think again and we keep circling around the question that the wes who have been a little bit more accommodating, if not for the sake of russia, then for the sake of ukraine in providing russia with the security that it asked for. and what it asked for is simply the guarantees of neutrality and uk

the 2nd phase, the ussr is attacked by $250.00 nato divisions, so via phone, so taken over by nato naval force is the 3rd phase, annihilating the ussr, wiping it off the world map to that end, all new weapon types that to be deployed, nuclear chemical, radiological, and biological, as well as small on the final phase. breaking the ussr into full zones and posting nato troops on its territory. ah, more than 80000000 people. the majority of the huge countries population would have died in the intense bombing. and subsequent fighting we have a series of these kinds of war plants like kennedy that briefed on them in the early 1960. he was our of by, you know, any that we call ourselves a human race. but these clans continued for preemptive attacks against the soviet union. but this was in essence an updated version of the nazi general plan. aust, that envisaged eliminating millions of slavic people and as in world war to when much of europe still united against the usaa or the us plans to muster own nato nations under the aegis of operation dropshot. in 1949, the soviets acquired their own n

it was a nato operation, came to us in legal nato operation. they killed over 2000 innocent civilians. i'm frankly innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war anybody a ah, adelcia, doubly knew initially to restock and just look up from literally a muscle onion noon. she kitty doesn't being in the green shield on nash domingos place you mamma cook, go through sit critic somebody to look up to his ashley of this one. it was a peep into pieces goes down to come your proposals. wonder no, pre if this sort of cool zation did, did you? but not, not, but the key for the chino grimes to network post owns arrive, something like that. and then we got that was it that might be worth a 1000000 residential grain. lisa it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia. they couldn't go too far the so this case i was nina. what amiability auto squan i scenario yoga. others vienna you leave or stana this year? we say no good. i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, a national. he was lewinski scenario and lets not be any with talk other psy

should russia dare to step into nato territory, and exactly as russia did not want nato has now determined that it will keep many of these resources and troops in these places, long term, perhaps even permanently, to defend against whatever russia may have in store. now that moscow has turned out to be so unpredictable and so brutal. now the head of natal. yes. stoughton back told ukraine, it could rely on nato. nate to support for quote, as long as it takes, but how long member says realistically, keep up public support in their own countries. this is a big question. nan, of course, is being watched in every capital but a very closely in keith as well with ukranian officials warning or warning daily that in europe i cannot experience fatigue that the united states must keep up his support. and in fact, that is more difficult to say as gas prices rise as citizens start looking at where the money is going and wondering if, if military support for ukraine is in their interest. and in fact, there was some concern in july as european governments did not make any new military commitments of equ

the 2nd phase, the ussr is attacked by 250 nato divisions. soviet thought so taken over by nato naval forces. the 3rd phase, annihilating the usaa, wiping it off the world map. to that end, all new weapon types that to be deployed, nuclear, chemical, radiological, and biological, as well as small of the final phase. breaking the ussr into full zones and posting nato troops on its territory. ah, more than 18000000 people. the majority of the huge countries population would have died in the intense bombing and subsequent fighting. we have a series of these kinds of war plants, like kennedy briefed on them in the early 1960 s. he was our of by, you know, instead of we call ourselves a human race. but these clans continued for preemptive attacks against the soviet union. but this was, in essence an updated version of the nazi general plan. aust, that envisaged eliminating eons of slavic people and as in world war 2, when much of europe stood united against the usaa for the u. s. plans to muster own native nations under the aegis of operation dropshot. in 1949, the soviets acquired their o

the bigger issue of nato enlargement and nato membership, i understand, but there was no imminent threat that warranted rush and military intervention. this is a problem that should have been resolved, that the negotiating table couldn't owns this war. well, professor captain, i agree with you. 100 percent and owns this war in those and just put in but also russia. we will, berry this. we will carry rather this send for years, decades and perhaps even generations to come. this is a huge tragedy for all of us. we all have relatives in ukraine and they cause actually every single day we are, you know, very much connected to that conflict. no illusions about that. but at the end of the day, put in is the president of russia. and he has obligations before russia in defending its strategic security. don't you think again and we keep circling around that question that the west, who have been a little bit more accommodating, if not for the sake of russia, then for the sake of ukraine, in providing russia with the security that it asked for. and what it asked for is simply the guarantees of neut