so israel doesn't have to pay the donor community pays . israel doesn't have to amex and take responsibility and say all these people and out next to my territory, do i give them equal rights? do i formalize what organisations of issue rights, what should i missed? the international court system of apartheid. and then the other dynamic, of course, is what is the global geo political context in which one is operating? is it a context in which there is a very clear challenge to russia, actions in ukraine? glass is a very clear acquiescence to israel's actions in palestine and it's when you put all of those together that you begin to get a picture of okay, what can be done in this specific situation? now if i may draw one more parallel between days, rarely palestinian conflict, the or stalemate and the warning, the crane, i think ultimately both of them are about the issue of land, you know, historic land well gets to leave on that land. which language should people encourage to speak which culture or religion they are allowed to practice and so on? do you think these railey palestinian situati

we stand with israel no matter what consensus. and you see some senators like senator van hall in or you see members of the house who are speaking out more and more and starting to say that they are deeply concerned by the actions of the israeli government. however, ah, what we need to do is move past the point of deep concern. it's really good to see more and more members of congress who are speaking out and saying that they are worried about what could come down the line from this new government, whoever. what we really need are for members of congress to realize that what is already happening right now is already too late. it is already too much and we need not just statements of deep concern, but action and actually sen about holland who i mentioned before is an example of someone who is moving forward on things like pushing for an investigation of the killing of palestinian american journalists, jewelry and r block left, or you have members of the house, like congressmen, surely rashid a to leave, for example. representative

so israel doesn't have to pay the donor community pays. israel doesn't have to amex and take responsibility and say all these people are now, i'm next to my territory. do i give them equal rights? do i formalize what organisations issue rights? what should i missed? the international court system of apartheid. and then the other dynamic, of course, is what is the global geo political context in which one is operating? is it a context in which there is a very clear challenge to russia's actions in ukraine? glass is a very clear acquiescence to israel's actions in palestine. and it's when you put all of those together that you begin to get a picture of okay, what can be done in this specific situation? now if i may draw one more parallel between days, really palestinian conflict, the stalemate and the warning, the crane, i think ultimately both of them are about the issue of land, you know, historic land well gets to leave on that land. which language should people encourage to speak which culture or religion they are allowed to practice and so on? do you think these railey palestinian situat

so israel doesn't have to pay the donor community pays. israel doesn't have to amex and take responsibility and say all these people are now next to my territory. do i give them equal rights? do i formalize what organisations or tissue rights watch? and i'm just the international court system of apartheid. and then the other dynamic, of course, is, what is the global geo political context in which one is operating? is it a context in which there is a very clear challenge to russia's actions in ukraine? glass is a very clear acquiescence to israel's actions in palestine and it's when you put all of those together that you begin to get a picture of okay, what can be done in this specific situation? now if i may draw one more parallel between days, really palestinian conflict, the stalemate, and the war in the crane. i think ultimately both of them are about the issue of land, you know, historic land well gets to leave on that land. which language should people encourage to speak which culture or religion they are allowed to practice and so on . do you think these really palestinian situation

want to see a peace without israel who don't want to stay next to israel but a state instead of israel, that in effect of veto on israel's expansion of the peace, circle of peace around it. i went around them. i went directly to the arab states and forged with a new concept of peace for peace, peace through strength. i forged four historic peace agreements. >> the abraham accords. >> twice the number of peace agreements that all my predecessors in 70 years got combined. >> let me ask you about it. i know you're committed to the abraham accords which are a huge achievement by president trump and by you. i know you want to keep going. what happens when let's say the big prize is -- i know sudan is on the table. some of these southeastern asian countries are on the table, but the big prize is saudi arabia. what happens when saudi arabia gets the u.s. to go along with some of the things that they want from the u.s. in terms of security measures, but they say, look, prime minister netanyahu, they probably call you bibi, i need something for the palestinians in order to go along with this. i

the birth of israel in 1947. and since continued territorial expansion into gaza in the south and the west bank along the jordan river, 2 major wars, 194-8900. 67 displaced hundreds of thousands of palestinian arabs. those who remained in the territorial homeland say, they live in an apartheid state. and here to weigh in is heard a morry, she's the co founder of the direct action network for palestine. she's joining us from the u. k. put is israel and apartheid state. i mean, would you compare it to south africa between 1948, and 991. so i would describe all of her state practices out apartheid, apartheid. the word apartheid isn't africans, words which make means separateness. and to put it simply means a donation of one racial creep over another and to understand in the context of palestine. and we have since i'm the formation of the apartheid state which began and $948.00. and what we call the max was translates into english as the great catastrophe. and this was one zionist militia, boxed by western government

you know, israel's far right cabinet. they've approved the legalization of 9 illegal settler outpost the occupied west bank. there was a statement from prime minister benjamin netanyahu. his office has said more housing units are likely to be built in separate existing, illegal settlements. the by the ministration opposes the authorization of israeli outpost. they've erred their views against new settlements. i mean the u. s. provides billions of dollars and military 8 israel does the us government not care? do they not get offended by the fact that israel essentially ignores them? on this issue because joanne is actually misguided because this is a conflict between 2 sites, not just one side. and you can ask a similar question about why ministration, quote unquote ignores the fact that the palestinian authority continues to subsidize terrorism against innocent israeli civilians. you can ask why the, by ministration, quote unquote ignores the fact the senior members of the palestinian authority cabinet and senior members

and israel is watching this. and as bibi said, bibi netanyahu said to jake, i'm not going to let this happen. in fact, but i was struck by, he said i've gotten into this job for three reasons. and number one, is iran. so, this is his number one priority as prime minister. what that means is the israelis are going to take some kind of action if they see the iranians keep entering? and the iranians are keeps going to enter for it, because their backs against the wall. they don't have an out. they don't have another option. they don't have any prospect of a deal. they're cornered, they're feeling the pressure at home domestically. so that leaves, as you put it will, u.s. policy makers looking at a very dangerous situation with an iran that has militias in iraq, militias in syria, militias in lebanon, a program that could become a nuclear weapons program. and in israel, determined to stop that. it feels to me like a pretty combustible mix. >> yeah, it's a really dangerous situation right now by all accounts. and i sp

so israel doesn't have to pay the donor community pays. israel doesn't have to amex and take responsibility and say all these people and out i next to my territory, do i give them equal rights? do i formalize what organisations issue right to watch and i'm just the international court system of apartheid. and then the other dynamic, of course, is, what is the global geo political context in which one is operating? is it a context in which there is a very clear challenge to russia's actions in ukraine? last is a very clear acquiescence to israel's actions in palestine. and it's when you put all of those together that you begin to get a picture of okay, what can be done in this specific situation? now if i may draw one more parallel between days, really palestinian conflict, the stalemate, and the war in the crane. i think ultimately both of them are about the issue of land, you know, historic land well gets to leave on that land. which language should people encourage to speak which culture or religion they are allowed to practice and so on? do you think these railey policy and situation as

not just of occupation of israel. so the fact is that the by the restoration like every american government and every reasonable person is caught between 2 sides, each one of which has extremists, the call for the political suicide, the other side, the palestinians, and israelis. and so we need to ask what it is that can be done to get out of this impasse rather than point fingers only at one side in this conflict. valid, israel says the military res, across the occupied westbank are meant to stop attacks against israelis. palestinians view this as another example of its violent occupation. prime minister netanyahu announced that his government is going to step up those nightly rates. how concerned are you that this situation is only going to get worse and what are the implications of that? yeah, i mean, i think all the trend lines are certainly very disturbing. everything looks like it's getting worse. we've heard, we've seen how the casualty figures the deaths, especially of palestinian, but also of israel is, is mu

so israel doesn't have to pay the donor community pays. israel doesn't have to amex and take responsibility and say, all these people are now next to my territory. do i give them equal rights? do i formalize what organisations of tissue rights watch, and i'm just the international court system of apartheid. and then the other dynamic, of course, is what is the global geo political context in which one is operating? is it a context in which there is a very clear challenge to russia, actions in ukraine last is a very clear acquiescence to israel's actions in palestine. and it's when you put all of those together that you begin to get a picture of okay, what can be done in this specific situation? now if i may draw one more parallel between days, really palestinian conflict, the stalemate and the warning, the crane, i think ultimately both of them are about the issue of land, you know, historic land well gets to leave on that land. which language should people encourage to speak which culture or religion they are allowed to practice and so on? do you think these railey policy and situation as

and israel is watching this. and as bibi said, bibi netanyahu said to jake, i'm not going to let this happen. in fact, but i was struck by, he said i've gotten into this job for three reasons. and number one, is iran. so, this is his number one priority as prime minister. what that means is the israelis are going to take some kind of action if they see the iranians keep entering? and the iranians are keeps going to enter for it, because their backs against the wall. they don't have an out. they don't have another option. they don't have any prospect of a deal. they're cornered, they're feeling the pressure at home domestically. so that leaves, as you put it wolf, u.s. policy makers looking at a very dangerous situation with an iran that has militias in iraq, militias in syria, militias in lebanon, a program that could become a nuclear weapons program. and an israel determined to stop that. it feels to me like a pretty combustible mix. >> yeah, it's a really dangerous situation right now, by all accounts. and i sp

you know, israel's far right cabinet. they've approved the legalization of 9 illegal settler outpost the occupied west bank. there was a statement from prime minister benjamin netanyahu, his office, the said, more housing units are likely to be built in separate existing, illegal settlements. the by the ministration opposes the authorization of israeli outpost. they've erred their views against new settlements. i mean the u. s. provides billions of dollars and military 8 israel. does the u. s. government not care? do they not get offended by the fact that israel essentially ignores them on this issue? because joanne is actually misguided because this is a conflict between 2 sites, not just one side. and you can ask a similar question about why ministration, quote unquote ignores the fact that the palestinian authority continues to subsidize terrorism against innocent israeli civilians. you can ask why the, by ministration, quote unquote ignores the fact the senior members of the palestinian authority cabinet and senior me

with israel belongs to the jewish people. i am telling the americans and the europeans stop being worried. this is our goal. this is of you, 9 downs is nice, but this is definitely not enough. we want much more. the cabinet has also approved the building of some 10000 new units in judea and samaria. these rarely term for the west bank palestinians are outraged. the move comes as israel carries out unprecedented demolitions in the neighborhoods of east jerusalem. thousands of buildings that israel considers illegal will be turned to ruins. the settlers have their own view on how things should develop. a switzerland. it is all right to be here in the tora, god promised abraham that it is all right to be here. and it doesn't matter what all the states say will leave here. we came here after 2000 years of exile and thank god we were privileged to establish a town here more than 4 175000 israel is leaving over 140 settlements in the west bank, which is also home to almost 3000000 palestinians. all of these settlements are illegal

i don't know what happened to israel. i'm honestly in shock because i don't understand why they couldn't give us air defenses. i'm stating the facts. my conversations with israeli leadership have done nothing to help you crane. it was very honest and frank conversation. i tried to convince lippitt that i think it's a strategic mistake. and i believe that it would be in the best strategic interests of israel to cooperate fully with ukraine. politicians in israel will be ashamed in the future because they didn't stand by our side at this time. since december, eyes were on the countries, new government and 10, some of it started talking about the drastic shifting israeli policy. that's also the country's new foreign minister alley coin. had a phone conversation with russia stomped, implements that a gay la grove before his ukrainian counterpart. that but especially coin statement that he made in his inaugural speech with regard to the russia ukraine issue. we will do one thing for certain in public. we will talk less. we wil

the land of israel belongs to the people of israel. this is our mission. this is sol dock train. 9 settlements is nice, but it's still not enough. we will in much more. this statement comes as israel approves the legislation of 9. saddler outposts in the occupied west bank with more housing units likely to be billed in other existing settlements, according to prime minister benjamin netanyahu. the united nations has condemned israeli settlements in the occupied palestinian territories in multiple resolutions . and both, however, more than 200 settlements were built on palestinian land with more than half a 1000000 israelis living there. to discuss as we cross live now to washington base civil rights attorney, robert t. o. robert, welcome. we've seen a number of cases of people withdrawn from their post for criticism of israeli policy and palestinian territories. what do you make of this lady's reaction? is it status quo or is this something new? the status quo that we've seen for the last 70 plus years in foreign policy. we've created this place where the

so israel doesn't have to pay the donor community pays. israel doesn't have to amex and take responsibility and say all these people and out next to my territory. do i give them equal rights? do i formalize what organisations that issue rights? what should i missed? the international court system of a party. and then the other dynamic, of course, is what is the global geo political context in which one is operating? is it a context in which there is a very clear challenge to rush elections in ukraine? glass is a very clear acquiescence to israel's actions in palestine and it's when you put all of those together that you begin to get a picture of okay, what can be done in this specific situation? now if i may draw one more parallel between days, really palestinian conflict, the stalemate, and the war in the crane. i think ultimately both of them are about the issue of land, you know, historic land well gets to leave on that land. which language should people encourage to speak which culture or religion they are allowed to practice and so on? do you think these railey policy and situation as

so israel doesn't have to pay the donor community pays. israel doesn't have to amex and take responsibility and say all these people and now i'm next to my territory. do i give them equal rights? do i formalize what organisations on the issue? right? what should i missed? the national water system of apartheid. and then the other dynamic, of course, is what is the global geo political context in which one is operating? is it a context in which there is a very clear challenge to russia's actions in ukraine? glass is a very clear acquiescence to israel's actions in palestine. and it's when you put all of those together that you begin to get a picture of okay, what can be done in this specific situation? now if i may draw one more parallel between days, really palestinian conflict, the stalemate, and the warning, the crane, i think ultimate, that both of them are about the issue of land. you know, historic land well gets to leave on that land, which language people encourage to speak, which culture or religion they are allowed to practice and so on. do you think these railey palestinian situat

determined to have committed what israel calls acts of terror. the new law exclusively targets palestinians of israel and palestinians in occupied east jerusalem, allowing them to be deported to the occupied west bank and gaza. legal experts say such deportations would constitute an act of forcible transfer, which is a war crime. the united nations security council is expected to vote next week on a palestinian-backed resolution demanding an immediate halt to all israeli settlement activities and condemning the annexation of illegal settlements and outposts. diplomats told reporters the u. is seekinto replace the resoluti with a weer statement. in washington, state department spokesperson vedant patel declined to say if the u.s. would veto the resolution. >> the introduction of this resolution is unhelpful in supporting the conditions necessary to advance negotiations for a two state solution. amy: in georgia, the special grand jury investigating attempts by president trump and his allies to overturn the 2020 election determined that at least one

comments made by members of this body about support for israel being all about the become minee of israel is engaging in apartheid are appalling, wrong, and disqualifying. additionally, those who dismiss 9/11 as some people who did something, are you kidding me? it was a terrorist attack. it wasn't some people doing something. or to equate the united states and israel, both democratic nations, to the taliban and hamas, and those who promote the sent see metic b.d.s. movement? you are damn right they deserve to be held accountable. as a member that represents a district that suffered greatly due to 9/11, and still has constituents grappling with the effects of that horrific tragic day, dying of 9/11 health related situations, i find those remarks jarring and alarming and insulting. to be clear, the representative can say whatever the heck she wants. but we don't have to accept it. or embrace it. individuals who hold such hateful views should rightly be barred from that type of committee. we cannot let the poisonous ideology of anti-semitism permeate into policy decisions that impact the li

ambassador to israel. since taking up his post in jerusalem, he's been a very active ambassador, very active on social media, and been at the forefront of some important developments, including dealing with the abraham accords and as well dealing with recent tensions in israel and its surrounded areas. prior to his current role, tom was managing director and vice chairman of morgan stanley. he served as u.s. state department deputy secretary of state for then-secretary clinton. and he's had other important roles in government and in the private sector. and finally, victoria nuland, ambassador nuland was confirmed in april, 2021, as under secretary of state for political affairs. making her the state department's highest ranking career diplomat. she has incredible experience, over three decades serving in various posts including assistant secretary of state for european and year asia affairs from september, 2013, until january, 2017. and as state department spokesman as well. she was the first female u.s. a

on a visit to israel, u. s. secretary of state anthony blinking called on both sides to come tensions and said a 2 state solution was the only way to end but conflict. my guess this week is the head of the palestinian mission to the u. k. or some, some lat. does he believe that's possible? we see no approach to achieve that. but does the palestinian leadership have the authority among its own people to negotiate with israel and unite the different factions? why the never ending allegations of brutality and corruption its ranks? isn't it time for a new leader who can trust of his people and the outside world for some odd welcome to public zone. thank you. where is all this violence leading? all this violence is absolutely leading to one fact that until a new palestinian generation is born free of occupation colonization and the part time. and no matter how more israeli brutality will be more brutality, more oppression, no matter international complicity, nothing will change until that is achieved. what can sto

to israel, that there are red lines. so this is why we see what we see. and i wouldn't be surprised if we surpass that 2020 to figure very soon because of the fact that this is not only given they've been given the green light. but this is now also a brightening government that has also put palestinians literally in their cross here. i'm glad you mentioned this right wing government. nota benjamin netanyahu has returned as prime minister, even though he left off is facing a corruption scandal. and in fact, even today, he's still facing corruption charges. it would seem like netanyahu had a strategy of forging strategic alliances with the far, i mean, far right in order to come back into power. but since a new government took office in december, these really public has opposed many of his policies, such as the recent move to weaken the country supreme court and abroad. several of israel's closest allies have expressed concerns about the recent moves by far right figures appointed to the highest level positions in israeli

on the israel—palestine conflict smacked notjust of being anti—israel, but being anti—semitic. and ijust wonder, again, with hindsight, now that you can sit there at harvard, what impact did that have on you? i mean, you're obviously born ofjewish parents and here you are being accused of anti—semitism. i did grow up with hitler stories. i grew up very aware of the evil that governments could do, and that's a lot of what launched me into my career. now, you know, i can put up with them calling me anti—semitic because it's just so preposterous. it doesn't stop me from continuing to report on israel. but i do worry about this growing tendency to try to silence criticism of israel by claiming that every critic is anti—semitic. and i mean, it's obviously not true. i mean, you can have some anti—semites who criticise israel, but there are many, many people who legitimately criticise israeli repression who are just labelled anti—semitic. and that is, you know, it's bad for free expression, for the defence of human rights, but it's bad foranti—semitism, because... well, if

israel's borders. especially when there's a flare up in these railey palestinian conflict the by that and conflicting as soon as there is conflict in israel, the atmosphere here immediately becomes tougher. how far more uncomfortable for some i from resume missing. what's your, what's always been irritating for me is when i say i'm jewish and then people criticize me for israel's policy is blame me for them. i don't have an israeli passport, i can't vote there. i don't have the right to vote there and i don't have a say in the political situation and i'm not israeli or, and it's been kinase quaylon. went hard when someone asked me that, what do you think about what's going on in israel right now and, and without an accusatory under tone. and without, i know, like what are you and i people doing there again. but simply, what do you make of it? and then of course i answer them normally, but it's not what you say. it's how you say it. how about the tool? nothing was he so choose all over the world are not

ready discrimination it had nothing to do with israel or israel. ready doing what israel is doing is practicing. ready on a mission and violence and racism against another, another people by the way, for submitted. so it's, it's almost like if it was a. ready service this year, there was outraged over the deliberate killing of a renowned palestinian american journalist, sharina oakley, by the idea of the state department has effectively accepted this as a fact. it's true after a very vague and tacit admission by israeli authorities. however, despite her holding a us passport, the state department has stopped short of issuing any sort of rebuke or punishment . why do you think that is? well, let's, let's, we wasn't clear to start with what the demand has been from the family and still is the. ready as well as an increasing number of american congress, people and senators is that the demand that the united states government. ready fund or the. ready white house, authorize an f b i investigation. so even before we get to the. ready point of view in co

ready discrimination had nothing to do with israel or israel. ready doing what israel is doing is practicing on a mission and violence and racism against other people and other people by the way, for submit it. so it's, it's almost there on it. if it was a. ready service this year, there was outraged, over the deliberate killing of a renowned palestinian and american journalist, sharina oakley, by the idea of the state department has effectively accepted this as a fact. it's true after a very vague and tacit admission by israeli authorities. however, despite her holding a u. s. passport the state department has stopped short of issuing any sort of rebuke or punishment. why do you think that is? will it will be clear to start with what the demand has been from the family and still in the. ready family as well as an increasing number of american congress. people and senators is a demand that the united states government. ready ready fund or the. ready white house, authorize an f b i investigation. so even before we get to the. ready point of view

israel's borders. especially when there's a flare up in these railey palestinian conflict. but by that and conflicting, as soon as there is conflict in israel, the atmosphere here immediately becomes tougher. how far more uncomfortable mister muffin resumed? listen, it's, you know, what's always been irritating for me is when i say i'm jewish and then people criticize me for israel's policies or blame me for them. i don't have an israeli passport, i can't vote there. i don't have the right to vote there. i don't have a say in the political situation and i'm not israeli. or, and it's been kinda is, hi, ellen went far when someone asked me, what do you think about what's going on in israel right now? i'm and without an accusatory undertone, and without i know, what are you, any people doing there again, but simply what do you make of it? and then of course i answer them normally and, but it's not what you say. it's how you say it. how about even the tool? nothing was he so. busy dues all over the world a

israel's borders. especially when there's a flare up in these brailey palestinian conflict the by that and conflicting as soon as there is conflict in israel, the atmosphere here immediately becomes tougher. how far more uncomfortable? for some i from resume isn't it looks you know, what's always been irritating for me is when i say i'm jewish and then people criticize me for israel's policies or blame me for them. i don't have an israeli passport, i can't vote there. i don't have the right to vote there and i don't have a say in the political situation and i'm not israeli or, and it's been kinase quaylon. went hard when someone asked me that, what do you think about what's going on in israel right now and, and without an accusatory under tone. and without, i know, like what are you and i people doing there again. but simply, what do you make of it? and then of course, i answer them normally, but it's not what you say. it's how you say it. how about the tool? nothing was the so do's all over the world

beyond israel's borders. especially when there's a flare up in these railey palestinian conflict, but by that angle thickening, as soon as there is conflict in israel, the atmosphere here immediately becomes tougher. health, more uncomfortable? for some i for me still missing the hooks. yeah. what's always been irritating for me is when i say i'm jewish and then people criticize me for israel's policies or blame me for them. i don't have an israeli passport, i can't vote there. i don't have the right to vote there. i don't have a say in the political situation and i'm not israeli. or, and it's been kinda is, hi, ellen went far when someone asked me that, what do you think about what's going on in israel right now? i'm and without an accusatory undertone, and without knowing what are you and there are people doing there again, but simply, what do you make of it? and then of course i answer them normally, but it's not what you say. it's how you say it. how about even the tool nothing was the so. busy dues all o

in much israel related anti semitism, more often than not to political events linked to israel. also prompt, arise in antisemitic attacks, way beyond israel's borders. especially when there's a flare up in these railey palestinian conflict the by that and conflicting as soon as there is conflict in israel, the atmosphere here immediately becomes tougher. health, more uncomfortable for so muffin, resume isn't. what's your, what's always been irritating for me is when i say i'm jewish and then people criticize me for israel's policies or blame me for them. i don't have an israeli passport, i can't vote there. i don't have the right to vote there. i don't have a say in the political situation and i'm not israeli. or, and it's been kinda is hi, ellen montague, when someone asked me that, what do you think about what's going on in israel right now? i'm and without an accusatory undertone, and without i know, what are you and there are people doing there again, but simply, what do you make of it? and then of course i answer them normally. but it's not what you say. it's how you say it

the birth of israel in 1947. and since continued territorial expansion into gaza in the south and the west bank along the jordan river, 2 major wars, 194-8900. 67 displaced hundreds of thousands of palestinian arabs. those who remained in the territorial homeland say, they live in an apartheid state. and here to weigh in is heard a morry, she's the co founder of the direct action network for palestine. she's joining us from the u. k. product is israel and apartheid state. i mean, would you compare it to south africa between 1948, and 991. so i would describe as all of her state practices out apartheid, apartheid the word apartheid season. afrikaans words which make means separateness . and to put it simply means a donation of one racial creep over another and to understand in the context of palestine. and we have since i'm the formation of the apartheid state which began and $948.00. and what we called the maxima was translates into english as the great catastrophe. and this was when zionist militia boxed by west

will be quoted being anti israel will be equated to be anti american policy. i don't see how that opposed to relatives in the united states of america. and finally, the f. b, i has opened an investigation into 2 inmate deaths in the texas jail. now this comes amid allegations from a former employee of that jail, that those in custody were mistreated at ritual a witness correctional staff miss st. detainees, because they were in need of insulins for diabetes or other medical issues. there have been for prisoner death since the beginning of the year in harris county jail . but in the neighboring states of arkansas, the family of immensely ill man who started at ha, filed a lawsuit against the county. kelly moping has more the details of the law suit or not for the squeamish. we have a mentally ill, disabled homeless man who is arrested for pointing his finger at police officers. he can't afford to pay $100.00 to get out of jail. so he's held awaiting trial during that time and he's put in solitary confinement and he eventually dies from malnutrition. as larry eu

to stay next to israel, but instead of israel. they had an effective veto on israel's expansion of the peace circle, the piece around it. i went around them. and we directly to the arab states, and forged with a new concept of peace for peace, peace through strength, i forged for historic -- >> the abraham accords. >> that's twice the amount of peace agreements that all of my predecessors in 20 years got combined. >> i know you are so committed to the abraham accords, which is a huge achievement. that was by president trump, and by you. i know you want to keep going. what happens when the big prize is -- i mean, i know that sudan is on the table, some of the southeastern countries around the table. the big rise in saudi arabia obviously. what happens when saudi arabiata obviously. what happens when saudi arabia gets the u.s. to go along with some of the things that go along with the u.s., including security measures that they say, look, prime minister netanyahu, but i need something for the palestinians. in order to go along with

when it comes to ezra and, and compare that to ukraine, by the way, when it comes to israel, israel is always shielded by the west, shielded by the u. s. and the okay from our i don't know that mr. or mrs. are only accountability. this is the hot exam lot. there haven't been any meaningful peace talks for almost 10 years. how do you emerge from this un ending cycle of blame and violence? jewish israelis think they are the exclusive victims in this conflict. palestinians say they're the victims. you're a diplomat. how can you help move the discussion on from this point me principal, by a stop wasting time by really addressing the real suffering of the people. our people has been under aggression for a 100 years softer than this. i don't, i concrete term, a new president mahmoud abbas said last year. he had no choice but to deal with benjamin netanyahu. is that still the case? and if so, what kind of dealings is he going to have with mr. newton? yeah, or talk concrete contract can get mr. nathan here who will not be with us. we have no part not in this early site mister netanyahu. that's

will be quoted being anti israel will be equated to be anti american policy. i don't see how that opposed to relatives in the united states of america. and western media are starting to admit the failure of sanctions against the russian energy sector. as reports say, last year, russian companies did the most drilling and oil fields. and more than a decade with little sign that international sanctions actually work. the total number of new wells rose by nearly 7 percent with most key oil companies beating the previous year's results. it comes amid a russian energy band by the g 7 states and e u. countries with moscow redirecting its supplies to the east, making china and india, the largest importers of russian oil and gas on the continents. the russian energy sector hasn't been hit as hard by western sanctions as other companies which have stayed on the russian market. despite pledges to leave multinational oil and gas company, british petroleum is also keeping its stake and major russian oil company rows. nest. abandoning plans to wind up operations that's acc

, i'm glad to see mister cohen, israel's new foreign minister is prioritizing the us israel strategic relationship and supports continued him in terry and aid to ukraine. however, the idea that israel should speak less about russia criminal invasion of ukraine is a bit unnerving. it's really a rock and a hard place for months now with kids alleged ultimately with these roles seems to be left without room for maneuvers. and definitely the countries for ministers with 2 kids will be at tasks not only for israel ukraine relations, but also for you guys with both russia and the us. what's the outcome will be? well report say the court is meeting with the current president zaleski is not confirmed, but will happen if kid is that is fine with israel's response. even if promises are made behind closed doors, this is how we will know where does israel's tend you is persisting on its road to renewable energy as brussels has now named africa as a key partner in these efforts, however, the vice president of the commission has admitted that they have an especially vested interest in africa resour

to israel, that there are red lines. so this is why we see what we see. and i wouldn't be surprised if we surpassed that 2020 to figure very soon because of the fact that this is not only given they've been given the green light. but this is now also a brightening government that has also put palestinians literally in their cross here. i'm glad you mentioned this right wing government. nota benjamin netanyahu has returned as prime minister, even though he left off is facing a corruption scandal. and in fact, even today, he's still facing corruption charges. it would seem like netanyahu had a strategy of forging strategic alliances with the far, i mean, far right in order to come back into power. but since a new government took office in december, these really public has opposed many of his policies, such as the recent move to weaken the country supreme court and abroad. several of israel's closest allies have expressed concerns about the recent moves by far right figures appointed to the highest level positions in israel

ambassador to israel. since taking up hos active ambassador, very active on social media, and been at the forefront of some important developments, including dealing with the abraham accords and as well dealing with recent tensions in israel and its surrounded areas. prior to his current role, tom was managing director and vice chairman of morgan stanley. he served as u.s. state department deputy secretary of state for then-secretary clinton. and he's had other important roles in government and in the private sector. and finally, victoria nuland, ambassador nuland was confirmed in april, 2021, as under secretary of state for political affairs. making her the state department's highest ranking career diplomat. she has incredible experience, over three decades serving in various posts including assistant secretary of state for european and year asia affairs from september, 2013, until january, 2017. and as state department spokesman as well. she was the first female u.s. ambassador to nato during george bush

they were captured by israel in a war in 1967. israel still occupies the west bank. and has settlements built in parts of it. even though they old out of guards that they control guards that and the borders. and they occupied the territory. lately political tensions have been high and palestinian authority which contls part of the west bank. anchor: tre's been a lot of criticism of the palestinian authority in recent days. that is because it drops its demand up -- for a resolution from the un security council after a vote after israel made a big announcement on expanding settlements and legalizing previously unauthorized settlement outposts. there was a lot of u.s. pressure for it to do that. but what we understand is that there was a deal that was done in the background trying to calm the situation by washington. >> so there's been a collapse control by the palestinian authority's and security forces. militant groups have emerged in nearby cities. they used tiktok and telegram to's bread a message of the israeli occupation. israel has carried out to raids -- raids i

ready discrimination had nothing to do with israel or israel was doing what israel is doing is practicing a form of discrimination and violence. and. ready racism against other people and other people by the way, for submitted. so it's, it's almost there on it. if it was a. ready service this year, there was outraged over the deliberate killing of a renowned palestinian american journalist, sharina oakley, by the idea of the state department has effectively accepted this as a fact. it's true after a very vague and tacit admission by israeli authorities. however, despite her holding a u. s. passport the state department has stopped short of issuing any sort of rebuke or punishment. why do you think that is? well let's, let's make was been clear to start with what the demand has been from assembly and still is the message from the. ready family as well as an increasing number of american congress. people, senators, is it the demand that the united states government. ready fund. ready or the white house authorize an f b i investigation. so even before we get to the. ready point of view in co

on a visit to israel, u. s. secretary of state anthony, blinking called on both sides to come tensions and said a 2 state solution was the only way to end the conflict. my guest this week is the head of the palestinian mission to the u. k. or some som lot. does he believe that's possible? we see no approach to achieve that, but does the palestinian leadership have the authority among its own people to negotiate with israel and unite the different factions? why the never ending allegations of brutality and corruption it's rags? isn't it time for a new leader who can the trust of his people and the outside world for some dobler? welcome to communism. thank you. where is all this violence leading? all this violence is absolutely leading to one fact that until a new palestinian generation is born free of occupation colonization and the part time. and no matter how more is there any possibility we'll be more brutality, moral pressure, no matter international complicity, nothing will change until that is achieved.

israel's -- israel had -- just had 250,000 ammunition shells that we have for prepositioning taken out by the u.s. it's an american decision. it's their decision. it's fine. i have no problem with that. and in fact, didn't raise any objection. it's not our decision. but it's a point that people have to understand. we just took -- the u.s. just took a huge chunk of israel's munitions and passed it on to ukraine. israel also frankly act in ways i will not itemize here against iran's weapons productions, which are used against ukraine. >> yeah, russia has partnered with iran to kill ukrainian civilians. >> yeah. >> you're trying to take them out. you're saying you're taking out some of those arms? >> i'm saying that we are attacking iran's -- not only

well as z a secretary of state, of course it showed his close ties to israel. a he met with the prime minister, the minister of the fans dead. there had this kind of like very close sailing on security issues. and also all the issues connected to these early society. but what was really a striking where his says statement that he made in ramallah the kind of sympathy that he expressed towards the palestinians. and also if it condemning our or criticizing the kind of policies that the exact israeli government has decided on the last few days, he said that he is opposing the expanding of the supplement project. he's opposing the m legalization of outpost. he is opposing the demolition of palestinian homes. he opposes evictions. these are the kinds of things that we heard saturday night from the israeli government. these are the kinds of it policies that this government wants to promote. semi sa convert. well, how tangled and complicated the israeli palestinian conflict is at grassroots level can be seen in the example of a tiny bit of wind village in the west ban

. thousands of buildings that israel considers illegal will be turned to ruins. the settlers have their own view on how things should develop. she us hotel and it is all right to be here in the torah god promise abraham, that it is all right to be here and it doesn't matter what all the states say will leave here. we came here also 2000 years of exile and thank god we were privileged to establish a town here more than 475000 israelis leaving over 140 settlements in the west bank, which is also home to almost 3000000 palestinians. all of these settlements are illegal and international law. the palestinian authority has called the latest decision and open war against its people and is now pushing for you and security resolution to block the move israel on his part. he's working hard to convince the u. s. and it's western partners to veto this tap. the victory the stand off will determine whether the place i'm standing in now will become a new settlement, or if it will remain an illegal outpost reef notion or artie from bait hoglan. meanwhile, the u. s. has withdraw

is israel is doing is very huge. and i think that, you know, that we have a committee that is following up with the international court for, for such and abuses. i think there should be much presser pressure, especially with this government because of changing their policies to be heard of dollars. that what's the existing? i think we are in the, in the 21st century and the central should be more democratic, more humanitarian. and, and the policy knows we have the right to look for our freedom and it got right there for, we should be faced by like link. this is, this is basic. and the, all the documents of their not admissions is with their freedom. and with, with the freedom of the people on, on its own territory, we accepted as well as to not the twisted solution for for peace. and the trusted solution is not respected by israel. neither is peace is given for us. so this tuition is really hard. our people are going to continue building such aggression and looking for the international law to to, to be abided by isr

has been israel is a democratic ally. israel is our most important democratic ally. it has never been true and right now it is blatantly not true. if this government continues down this path, this is the thing when secretary lincoln visited israel, this was the only thing he wanted to talk about. he wanted to talk about judiciary reforms, concerns that if israel looked undemocratic, it would make it difficult for the biden administration to keep supporting it. it seems pretty clear to anyone paying attention that this government doesn't really care about that. if they continue down this path where they are increasingly exposing themselves and taking off the mask and showing israel is just a violent apartheid regime and not a democratic ally, what should be happening is countries should be responding in kind. the biden administration should respond to israel as it would with a country that is undemocratic and violently oppressing the people who live under its rule and that should mean using the pieces of leverage it has that matters most. for example, the 3.8 billion

way beyond israel's borders. especially when there's a flare up in these railey palestinian conflict the by that and conflicting as soon as there is conflict in israel, the atmosphere here immediately becomes tougher. how far more uncomfortable for some i from resume within the next year. what's always been irritating for me is when i say i'm jewish and then people criticize me for israel's policies or blame me for them. i don't have an israeli passport, i can't vote there. i don't have the right to vote there. i don't have a say in the political situation and i'm not israeli. or, and it's been kinda is ellen went hard when someone asked me that, what do you think about what's going on in israel right now? i'm and without an accusatory undertone, and without i know, like what are you in people doing there again, but simply, what do you make of it? then of course i answer them normally, but it's not what you say. it's how you say it. how about even the tool? nothing. was he so jews all over the world are not respo